Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Movie review: ‘Women Talking’ illuminates fascinating arguments

Published

on

Movie review: ‘Women Talking’ illuminates fascinating arguments

1/5

From left to proper, Rooney Mara, Claire Foy, Judith Ivey, Sheila McCarthy, Michelle McLeod and Jessie Buckley are “Ladies Speaking.” Photograph courtesy of Orion Photos

LOS ANGELES, Dec. 14 (UPI) — Ladies Speaking, in choose theaters Dec. 23, is an instance of what is attainable when individuals actually hear each choice in a dialogue and contemplate each nuance. It is a utopian notion, however hopefully could be a optimistic instance.

The ladies in a farming colony uncover a number of the males have been raping them at evening. They solely simply found it as a result of for years the lads had been drugging them and blaming their wounds on ghosts.

So, the ladies focus on their choices. At first, it seems to be a selection between staying to combat the lads or simply leaving for good, however it would not take lengthy earlier than the dialogue reveals extra questions.

Advertisement

Salome (Claire Foy) is for preventing. Different ladies, who’re towards leaving, concern they will not be allowed into heaven if they don’t seem to be within the colony. One girl exclaims, “Jesus Christ,” so that is possible a Christian colony (and he or she simply blasphemed).

Ona (Rooney Mara) is the primary to ask a query that shatters the binary thought course of. She means that they decide what they need their new colony to be earlier than they resolve whether or not to depart the present one.

Ought to they abandon all the lads who did not commit rape? Or are these males nonetheless responsible of not stopping the rapists or making a society through which the rapists may get away with it for therefore lengthy? What in regards to the moms of younger sons?

August (Ben Whishaw) is the schoolteacher who agreed to take minutes of the ladies’s assembly. He represents the potential of an excellent man, one who is not excellent however acknowledges his personal blind spots.

The colony is a microcosm of the world at massive. The varied factors of view can get heated or can go off on tangents, and most real-world arguments will not be as articulate as writer-director Sarah Polley’s adaptation of Miriam Toews’ 2019 e-book, however we are able to aspire to it.

Advertisement

The ladies within the colony have complicated relationships, and people come out throughout this dialogue.

Mariche (Jessie Buckley) has resentments towards most of the arguments for or towards leaving the colony. She’s already in an abusive marriage and has endured violence to maintain the peace for the group.

The delicate worth of forgiveness can also be explored. Everybody agrees it is improper for the lads to count on the ladies to forgive the rapists, however with a bit of distance, Ona begins to see a chance of forgiveness on her personal phrases.

The power to reframe unstable ideas modifications individuals’s choices. By the halfway level, one realizes there are exponentially greater than two sides to any either-or choice.

There’s even a trans character within the colony to characterize that facet of the broader world. There aren’t any individuals of coloration, however it’s unlikely a contained colony like that might be inclusive from its origin.

Advertisement

For a film actually about speaking, because the title guarantees, Polley retains the movie dynamic by staging and pairing off sure characters. Polley doesn’t present the assaults on display screen, though their aftermath is violent sufficient.

Ladies Speaking is an enchanting thought train, however one that’s possible actual to many individuals. By the ability of filmmaking and performances, it has the power to problem viewers’ common biases and display compassionate methods to impress vital considering.

Ladies Speaking expands its launch Jan. 10.

Fred Topel, who attended movie college at Ithaca Faculty, is a UPI leisure author based mostly in Los Angeles. He has been an expert movie critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001 and a member of the Tv Critics Affiliation since 2012. Learn extra of his work in Leisure.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Screen Grabs: Zut alors! The Count of Monte Cristo rides again – 48 hills

Published

on

Screen Grabs: Zut alors! The Count of Monte Cristo rides again – 48 hills

Historical fiction is what’s happening at the movies this week, with a side serving of current events in two more features. The big, plush beach-read epic among them is The Count of Monte Cristo, Alexandre Dumas’ adventure classic being given an extravagant new three-hour visualization by the French writing-directing team of Matthieu Delaporte and Alexandre de La Patelliere. Pierre Niney of Frantz and Yves Saint Laurent plays Edmond Dantes, a sailor of humble origin made good, until a jealous rival has him framed as an agent of the exiled Napoleon. Years later, he escapes an island prison and poses as a wealthy foreigner to insinuate himself into the worlds of the three men (Bastien Bouillon, Laurent Lafitte, Patrick Mille) who’d orchestrated his fate—and have profited from more crimes since.

Even with its narrative somewhat altered and compacted from Dumas’ sprawling original (which was first published as a serial between 1844-46), this remains a flamboyantly old-fashioned tale of credulity-stretching intrigue and coincidence. We seldom see its like on the big screen anymore—or maybe we do, but these days it’s more likely to take the overtly fantastical form of a Batman movie or the like. This lavish production does not shy from going over-the-top in its ostentatious settings, flashy drone shots or bombastic orchestral score. Still, it all pretty much works, particularly once the elaborate revenge scheme kicks in around mid-point.

It’s period popcorn entertainment on a grand scale, no less enjoyable for being more than a bit theatrically shameless. The Count of Monte Cristo begins opening around the Bay Area on January 3; likely SF venues (not yet confirmed at presstime) were the AMC Kabuki and Metreon.

Advertisement

As strikingly bleak in its handsome B&W austerity as The Count is eye-candy colorful, The Girl With the Needle from Danish director Magnus von Horn (whose prior Sweat we reviewed here) weaves fictional elements around a shocking criminal case from a century ago. In 1919 Copenhagen, Karoline (Vic Carmen Sonne) is a clothing-factory seamstress whose husband hasn’t come back from WWI service, and may well be dead. She is seduced by her wealthy boss (Jorgen Fjelstrup), but any dreams of a wealthy, stable future with him get squelched by a first/last meeting with his imperious mother.

Now pregnant and desperate, with legal abortion not an option, Karoline finds herself aided by a stranger met by chance. Middle-aged Dagmar (Trine Dyrholm) seems to be in the business of helping just such poor young women, and placing their unwanted children in “good homes.” But it is not until she’s become an integral part of Dagmar’s ongoing operation that Karoline realizes her benefactress is secretly a monster—a sort of matricidal equivalent to Sweeney Todd. It is that figure who’s based on a real-life one, her trial leading to major changes in child-protective laws; and the formidable Dyrholm is impressive as always in the role.

But primary focus here is on fictive Karoline, who is not very interesting or even terribly sympathetic. The facts on record are so much more powerful than what von Horn chooses to portray, his choices end up seeming rather inscrutable, despite the film’s compelling atmosphere and aesthetics. It’s an arresting exercise in many respects that nonetheless proves somewhat frustrating. Girl opens Fri/3 at SF’s Roxie, with other Bay Area venues to follow.

Taking place a few years earlier on the far opposite ends of Eurasia is Harbin from South Korean writer-director Woo Min-ho, of prior hit political thrillers Inside Men and The Man Standing Next. It’s set in 1909, four years after a multinational treaty forced Korea to basically become a colony of Japan following the latter’s winning the Russo-Japanese War. Abandoned by allies (including the US), nationalists formed resistance groups to combat the encroachment of further Japanese imperialism, among them the Korean Independence Army. Ahn (Hyun Bin) is fighting in their ranks when they score a combat victory over some surprised Nippon troops. But he insists on honoring international war-crimes rules by not executing some captured personnel, despite his own men’s objections. That turns out to be a bitterly regretted decision, because spared high-ranking officer Mori (Park Hoon) soon seizes an opportunity to massacre nearly all Ahn’s comrades.

Advertisement

To redeem himself, Ahn decides he’ll make it his mission to assassinate Japan’s Prime Minister as he travels across China to meet with Russian diplomats, orchestrating deals that will secure Korea’s subjugation. This involves a labyrinth of undercover intrigue, arms acquisition, betrayal, shootouts, and so forth, with a mole conveying most of these planned guerrilla actions to the relentless Mori before they can occur.

Dense with background details and explication that may be somewhat daunting to non-Korean audiences, Harbin nonetheless maintains interest with a somber, tense mood spiked by occasional outbursts of violence. It’s handsomely produced on impressive locations, from spectacular mountain and desert landscapes to myriad interiors whose dark look amplifies the surreptitious nature of the characters’ activities. A history lesson framed as heroic action-suspense tale, Harbin may for Western viewers recall starry big-budget WW2 espionage epics of the 1960s like Where Eagles Dare and Von Ryan’s Express—though it’s a bit less heavy on the swaggering machismo. It opens in Bay Area theaters Fri/3.

Another fact-inspired new drama has gotten a divisive response, with raves and awards from some quarters, while others have found it curiously alienating. I’m sorry to say I landed on the debit side of that divide—sorrier still because the source material seemed such a natural for the screen. Colson Whitehead’s Pulitzer-winning 2019 novel The Nickel Boys provided a succinctly powerful portrait of slavery long after the official end of slavery, via abuses visited on boys at a very long-running fictive Florida boys’ reform school (in real life the now-shuttered Dozier School). Its protagonist gets sent there unjustly as a juvenile in the early 1960s, and is lucky to survive the experience. Much later, he lives to see the institution investigated, uncovering decades of brutality including rape, beatings, and the unmarked graves of former wards who supposedly “ran away” or simply “disappeared.”

Nickel Boys (the “the” has been dropped) is a first narrative feature for RaMell Ross, who previously had turned his sojourn teaching photography in rural Alabama into a fine poetical documentary of life there. Hale County This Morning, This Evening was oblique but evocative, offering little in the way of concrete storytelling yet providing heady, lyrical insight into a place and culture.

Advertisement

But Whitehead’s book is full of vivid incident, character dynamics, and historical context; it’s not the sort of thing that lends itself to flavorful abstraction. Whatever led Ross to make the decisions he makes, they didn’t work for me: He has shot this intensely dramatic story entirely in the first-person, initially limited to the perspective of teenaged Elmwood (Ethan Herisse), then also that of Turner (Brandon Wilson), who becomes his only real friend at the dreaded “Nickel Academy.”

Their travails rendered murky by a POV in which we see the abuser, but not the abused (Ross and Joslyn Barnes’ screenplay tends to leave those acts to our imagination anyway), this is a movie whose high-minded experimentalism ends up only muffling the impact of its material. The effect is rather like reading a novel entirely written in the second person: It’s a gimmick that can be pulled off, yes, but why would you want to? The performers (also including Daveed Diggs, Hamish Linklater, and Jimmie Fails) are good, albeit handicapped by the alienating technique. Some, like Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor as Elwood’s grandmother, succumb to overstatement when repeatedly asked to play entire scenes directly to the camera, rather than a fellow actor.

The external threads Ross weaves in (often utilizing archival footage) involving the concurrent Civil Rights movement, “space race” etc. do ultimately pay off in making this long sit achieve a kind of complex, essayistic dimensionality. But those 15 minutes or so of Chris Marker-like montage succeed at the cost of The Nickel Boys, which will have to wait for a more straightforward future translation to realize the impact that fairly leapt off Whitehead’s pages, and which should have provided no obstacle to replication in this medium. It opens in Bay Area theaters Fri/3.

More direct depictions of grave present-tense injustices are on display in two more new films. Brendan Bellomo and Slava Leontyev’s Porcelain War centers on three Ukrainian artists living in the vicinity of devastated Kharkiv, very near the Russian border. Originally they’d all lived in Crimea, yet another “life stolen from us by Russia’s occupation.” Finding themselves in a new war zone, they maintain their disciplines as a form of protest: Cinematographer Andrey Stefanov keeps filming, including the mines and IUD’s now littering their countryside, while married couple Leontyev and Anya Stasenko continue creating ceramic miniatures that now offer commentary on this nation’s appalling day-to-day reality.

Advertisement

Occasionally bringing those whimsical figures to “life” via animation, Porcelain Nation can seem a bit twee, particularly when compared to the many more bluntly powerful documentaries about Ukraine the last couple years. But in its second half, the film acquires some power of its own, as we watch Slava train as a weapons expert for the Ukrainian Special Forces, and Andrey must cope with sending his children into exile for their own safety. There’s even gritty you-are-there footage of combat missions. Ultimately, the film’s strength lies in showing how art can retain its relevance, and artists their artistry, under the most antagonistic circumstances.

Likewise, From Ground Zero: Stories From Gaza is not the most hard-hitting of recent features about Palestinians’ plight, but it benefits from a diversity of approach to a grim subject. Conceived by Rashid Masharawi, the project brings together 22 filmmakers for as many individual contributions to a nearly two-hour omnibus reflecting everyday life in Gaza. As amply demonstrated here, that life is to a large degree now spent in refugee camps, or combing through the debris of homes newly bombed to rubble—sometimes still hoping to find survivors buried beneath.

There are sequences that are straight documentary reportage, others more in the realm of personal essay, plus a fair number of dramatized vignettes. In lighter moments, we see a standup comedian provide some escapist relief for refugees; animation and marionettes are utilized elsewhere.

Not everything here is good, with a wince-worthy moment or two, as during a bit that’s like a tacky amateur music video on YouTube. But the immediacy of so many voices in front of and behind the cameras does generate considerable insight. It would take a heart of stone not to be moved when at one point various children are interviewed, and one notes that her baby brother hasn’t yet acquired the power of speech—his experience to date has only taught him to imitate the sound of an ambulance siren.

Advertisement

Porcelain War and From Ground Zero both open Fri/3 at SF’s Roxie Theater, the former also at the Rafael Film Center in Marin.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

A look back at movie reviews of 2024

Published

on

A look back at movie reviews of 2024

Throughout the year, I took a look at quite a few new releases that were shown at the Dietrich Theater. Some of these new releases also consist of a few films that were shown during the seasonal film festivals. And, some of the new releases that I checked out were really good.

In fact, my top films of the year list is slightly bigger than usual. So, let’s get things started and here’s my top picks of 2024.

20. Remembering Gene Wilder

19. Civil War

18. Arthur the King

Advertisement

17. Anyone But You

16. The Holdovers

15. Inside Out 2

14. Ordinary Angels

13. Transformers One

Advertisement

12. The Wild Robot

11. It Ends With Us

10. Alien: Romulus

9. Twisters

8. Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga

Advertisement

7. Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes

6. Sonic the Hedgehog 3

5. Smile 2

4. The First Omen

3. Deadpool & Wolverine

Advertisement

2. The Wild Robot

And my number one pick of the year is … (definitely not Madame Web!) … Wicked.

As usual, there are some honorable mentions that were kind of close to making it to the top list! Migration; Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire; The Beekeeper; Moana 2; Kung Fu Panda 4; Abigail; IF; A Quiet Place: Day One; Gladiator II; The Bikeriders; Speak No Evil; Beetlejuice Beetlejuice; Horizon: An American Saga – Chapter 1; Reagan; Bad Boys: Ride or Die; My Penguin Friend; Saturday Night

For the first time, I will reveal a few selections that didn’t come close to making it to either the top list or the honorable mentions: Joker: Folie A Deux; Argylle; Lisa Frankenstein; The Watchers; Trap; The Crow

I plan on working on quite a few fun reviews through 2025! Besides the new releases and the film festival selections I generally work on, I will also be planning on some throwback reviews. Make sure to keep on checking my Wyoming County Examiner reviews page on Facebook for future reviews that I will be working on.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Marco Review: You Will Bathe in Blood

Published

on

Marco Review: You Will Bathe in Blood

BOTTOM LINE
You Will Bathe in Blood

RATING
2.75/5

CENSOR
A, 2h 24m


What Is the Film About?

When Victor, the younger brother of a powerful mafia family is killed inhumanly by a rival family, his step-brother Marco (Unni Mukundan) promises to take revenge. The movie’s basic story is the way Marco goes about the vengeance and the setbacks he faces.

Advertisement

Performances

Unni Mukundan goes for a complete makeover with Marco. The character is designed as a beast-like personality who is raw and untamed and will go to any extent to protect his loved ones. The physical transformation and the attitude on display make the part believable. But, that is only half the job done as there is a lot of action to do.

Unni Mukundan does extremely well in the action blocks. The ferocity and energy needed for the part are adequately presented in the performance. Believability is the main thing here and the effort makes it convincing from the start to the end. But once he sets the tone and mood for his character, there is hardly any variation he brings.


Analysis

Haneef Adeni writes and directs Marco. It is an out-and-out action film made for genre lovers with a very thin storyline.

Advertisement

The Raid, followed by Hollywood flick John Wick, and series like The Punisher etc. have provided a feast for action movie lovers globally in the last decade and a half. Many have tried to replicate the formula across the industries and here we are now in the same space with Marco.

The movie’s opening segment sets the basic premise neatly without much drag. The principal characters among whom the narrative takes place are given some expository dialogues to establish the world and the editing sets up the tone perfectly.

The hero doesn’t arrive immediately and comes after a lot of buildup, the kind we see in KGF and the like. It raises the expectations and meets them comfortably. The hero’s introduction makes it clear that the movie would be a no-holds-barred action romp with lots of stomach-curdling gore, violence and blood spilling.

The film’s first half is about the build-up to the intro and then to the interval. Everything else happening in between works in tandem with taking the narrative towards those blocks.

The interval block raises the stakes further after the intro in terms of the action. It does remind one of the climax sequence of a recently released Telugu flick, though.

Advertisement

Again, the small twists and turns the proceedings take to reach the interval are on expected lines, and nothing is frankly surprising. These scenes additionally contain brief emotional moments between the brothers to justify all the violence that follows.

Post the bang of an interval, the expectations only increase as to what could come next to top it. However, we don’t immediately get to the ‘action’ and there is some drama. It is typical of the genre, which again feels like a set-up to the next big bang.

We get that bang, but in an unexpected fashion during the pre-climax. It justifies the promotional tagline of the film as ‘The Most Violent Flick’ of the season. It is also emotional and most importantly not for the weak-hearted. Some moments in it might be too much to take for a normal viewer.

The climax is on expected lines after that mayhem seen previously. But, it doesn’t just go through the motions, it delivers a satisfying experience after all things are done. It’s this full contentment experience after the whole ordeal is where Marco succeeds. The joy of making it seeps through amidst all the bloodshed.

Overall, Marco is a violent action thriller with slick execution. It delivers on what it promises without holding back on anything. It is a treat, for action movie lovers who don’t mind the gore. If you like the genre, go ahead.

Advertisement

Performances by Others Actors

We have many artists playing bits and pieces roles in the movie. To those who follow Malayalam cinema, a few faces are instantly recognisable like Siddique, Jagadish etc. They fit into any character given to them effortlessly. We see the same here as they play gangsters.

The rest of the actors are relatively unknown from an outsider’s perspective. However, it doesn’t matter as when it comes to the performances, they all do an adequate job. They generate the right emotion conveying ruthlessness or disgust. Abhimanyu Thilakan and Kabir Duhan Singh impress playing the antagonists. The latter gets a short, but powerful part sure to leave an impact.

Among the female characters, only Yukti Thareja and Durva Thaker have crucial parts. The screen time is small, but they add emotional appeal in their own way.


Music and Other Departments?

Advertisement

Ravi Basrur of KGF fame composes the music. The songs are serviceable to the genre, but the background score is excellent in his typical style. It leans more on the techno side and parts of it are repeated throughout, but it doesn’t get monotonous, though. Technically the movie is slick with excellent cinematography and editing. The action choreography is top-notch and a major highlight of the flick. The writing is okay.


Highlights?

Action Blocks

Unni Mukundan

Editing

Advertisement

Drawbacks?

Thin Storyline

Too Much Gore (Not For Everyone)

Mechanical Drama


Did I Enjoy It?

Advertisement

Yes

Will You Recommend It?

Yes, to those who love action movies in all its bloody glory

Marco Telugu Movie Review by M9

Advertisement
This Week Releases on OTT – Check ‘Rating’ Filter
Continue Reading

Trending