Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Movie review: ‘The Creator’ can’t create an original story

Published

on

Movie review: ‘The Creator’ can’t create an original story

A robot monk gazes skyward at an American military space installation called Nomad in a scene from “The Creator.” (20th Century Studios/TNS)

When the first trailer for Gareth Edwards’ “The Creator” dropped, it seemingly promised a breath of fresh air into the sci-fi genre.

Manned by the director of “Rogue One, “The Creator” teased glimpses of stunning visuals most moviegoers would expect only of the biggest franchises, while also hinting at an original storyline.

While the movie does deliver with masterful cinematography, its hints of originality are nothing more than red herrings, as its story feels recycled and ultimately falls flat.

“The Creator” follows Joshua (John David Washington), a retired U.S. undercover operative who fought against rebellious, advanced and hyper-realistic artificial intelligence beings called Simulants.

Advertisement

Upon learning of a secret weapon the AI army has finished building with the potential to change the course of the ongoing war, Joshua — with his prior knowledge of the enemy’s defenses — is called back to action to help find and destroy the weapon.

The “twist” — if it can be called that, considering it was revealed in the film’s trailer — is that the weapon is actually a Simulant child (Madeleine Yuna Voyles) who has the ability to control electronic devices. The morals of the war become increasingly ambiguous as the movie progresses, and viewers learn more about the motivations of both sides.

“The Creator” looks stunning, and should be a favorite to win both Best Cinematography and Best Production Design at the next Oscars. What makes this feat even more impressive is that the film’s budget was only $80 million and was shot using an affordable Sony FX3. .

In comparison, recent MCU releases “Thor: Love and Thunder” and “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania” both had budgets of over $200 million, but nevertheless received immense criticism for poor CGI and unappealing visuals. By contrast, Edwards and cinematographer Greig Fraser (“Dune”), create a beautifully balanced, grounded world at a fraction of the cost.

Maybe the truly innovative triumph of “The Creator” lies not in some groundbreaking story, but rather in its ability to show studios that passion for a project beats out funding when it comes to CGI art and cinematography.

Advertisement

Though the visuals in “The Creator” impress, the plot falls flat on its face. For a movie that’s centered around AI, it’s ironic that ChatGPT probably could have written a better story.

The dialogue is at best clunky and at worst viscerally cringeworthy; it feels like there was no thought given to how lines would sound when actually spoken out loud, and instead screenwriters just went with whatever sounded interesting on paper.

The narrative borrows heavily from films like “Blade Runner,” “Avatar” and “Star Wars,” but “The Creator” doesn’t create anything new with the aspects it adopts and doesn’t seem to understand what made the elements of these franchises successful in the first place.

In particular, the main conflict of humans-vs-humanoids seems ripped directly from “Blade Runner,” but all of the philosophical questions it tries to raise were already posed in more nuanced and interesting ways 40 years ago. It’s also frustratingly familiar to “Star Wars,” even having a Death Star rip-off in the form of the Nomad, a massive ship that fires a death beam that the AI rebels seek to destroy.

“The Creator” seeks to prove a lot of points, whether about AI or the value of attention to detail in cinematography. But the biggest point it ends up proving is that no matter how beautiful a film looks, if the story doesn’t resonate with watchers, it’ll leave them feeling hollow.

Advertisement

“The Creator” steals more than it creates and will ultimately end up as just another forgettable sci-fi movie.

Rating: 3/5

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie review: “The Watchers”

Published

on

Movie review: “The Watchers”
“The Watchers” is a horror/thriller movie that is Isha Night Shyamalan’s directorial debut, released in 2024. It is based on the book The Watchers by A.M. Shine. There is a hint of fantastical elements throughout the movie and lore that would have made for a great overall story, but unfortunately,…
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘Summer Camp’ is an entertaining disappointment

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘Summer Camp’ is an entertaining disappointment

Nothing forges a friendship like treating an arrow wound. For Ginny, Mary and Nora, an ill-fated archery lesson and an injured classmate are just the beginning of the lifetime of trouble they’re about to start.

Ginny is a year above the other two, more experienced in both summer camp and girlhood, and takes it upon herself to somewhat forcefully guide her younger friends. Mary cowers in the bathroom away from her bunkmates, spouting medical facts, while Nora hangs back, out of place. When their camp counselor plucks them out of their cabin groups to place them in the new “Sassafras” cabin, they feel like they fit in somewhere for the first time.

50 years later, “Summer Camp” sees the three girls, now women, reunite for the anniversary reunion of the very same camp at which they met. Although they’ve been in touch on-and-off in the preceding decades, this will be the first time the women have seen each other in 15 years.

Between old camp crushes, childhood nemeses and the newer trials of adulthood, the three learn to understand each other, and themselves, in a way that has eluded them the entirety of their friendship.

I really wanted to like “Summer Camp.”

Advertisement

The opening scene, a glimpse at the girls’ first year together at Camp Pinnacle, does a good job at establishing Ginny, Mary and Nora’s dynamic. It’s sweet, funny and feels true to the experience of many adolescent girls’ friendships.

On top of that, this movie’s star-studded cast and heartwarming concept endeared me to it the moment I saw the trailer. Unfortunately, an enticing trailer is about the most “Summer Camp” has to offer.

As soon as we meet our trio as adults, things start to fall apart. It really feels like the whole movie was made to be cut into a trailer — the music is generic, shots cut abruptly between poses, places and scenes, and at one point two of the three separate shots of each woman exiting Ginny’s tour bus are repeated.

The main character and sometimes narrator, Ginny Moon, is a self-help writer who uses “therapy speak” liberally and preaches a tough-love approach to self improvement. This sometimes works perfectly for the movie’s themes but is often used to thwop the viewer over the head with a mallet labeled “WHAT THE CHARACTERS ARE THINKING” rather than letting us figure it out for ourselves.

There are glimpses of a better script — like when Mary’s husband asks her whether she was actually having fun or just being bullied, presumably by Ginny. This added some depth to her relationship with him, implying he actually does listen to her sometimes, and acknowledged the nagging feeling I’d been getting in the back of my head: “Hey, isn’t Ginny kind of mean?”

Advertisement

Despite all my annoyance with “Summer Camp,” there were a few things I really liked about it. I’m a lot younger than the main characters of this movie, but there were multiple points where I found myself thinking, “Hey, my aunt talks like that!” or, “Wow, he sounds just like my dad.”

The dynamic of the three main characters felt very true to life, I’ve known and been each of them at one point or another. It felt especially accurate to the relationships of girls and women, and seeing our protagonists reconcile at the end was, for me, genuinely heartwarming.

“Summer Camp” is not a movie I can recommend for quality, but if you’re looking for a lighthearted, somewhat silly romp to help you get into the summer spirit, this one will do just fine.

Other stories by Caroline

Advertisement

Caroline Julstrom, intern, may be reached at 218-855-5851 or cjulstrom@brainerddispatch.com.

Caroline Julstrom finished her second year at the University of Minnesota in May 2024, and started working as a summer intern for the Brainerd Dispatch in June.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

The Garfield Movie

Published

on

The Garfield Movie

⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ( out of 5)

He looks pretty good for being 45 years old and having a solid diet of the four basic food groups: lasagna, lasagna, lasagna, and lasagna. Garfield (Chris Pratt) has graced newspapers, cinemas, toy stores and has been a window ornament in cars worldwide. As one of the world’s most recognised cats, it is no wonder that he would get a new animated franchise to honour his four decades of lounging around in our lives.

This unlikely adventure takes audiences back to the origins of his life with Odie the beagle and their owner, Jon Arbuckle (Nicholas Hoult). As he does all he can to avoid Mondays and any form of exercise and finds new levels of leisure, the orange cat is suddenly confronted by his past as he is reintroduced to his long-lost father, Vic (Samuel L. Jackson). Their sudden family reunion is tainted by the unexpected need for his father to rectify a wrong with one of his former feline friends, the Persian cat – Vinx (Hannah Waddingham). The two cats and a friendly beagle must reacquaint themselves with one another as they work with Odie to fulfil the order from the criminal kitty who needs them to deliver a milk order that would rub any cat the wrong way. Along the way, they must befriend a wise bull named Otto (Ving Rhames) to stay ahead of dairy security officer Marge (Cecily Strong) as they hope to achieve their mission and get home to their life of lasagna and leisure.

When reviewing a film about a lazy, pasta-eating cat, one must manage expectations. To expect this to be groundbreaking cinema might be a bit of a stretch. Also, considering that there is little for families to enjoy in cinemas, The Garfield Movie might be the best snack food option for parents for the season. The tone goes from ridiculous to sentimental and back to farcical as if the source material is based on a classic cartoon, which, of course, it is. A consideration as you continue with this review and realise that the film will do exactly what it is meant to do, entertain families with the fun, ridiculous actions of the cat with little motivation to do much with his life except eat his favourite Italian food and spend time with his owner. Chris Pratt and the rest of the cast come along for the ride to complement this tale of friendship, family and food.

What should parents know about The Garfield Movie? Suppose your children loved the antics of the Super Mario Brothers or liked the humour delivered by the Minions. In that case, this film will provide laughs and a hankering for Italian food afterwards. Most of the laughs for parents will fly over the heads of the little ones and will provide something for the adults in the audience. There is little to object to outside the gluttonous tendencies of this legendary cat. The discussion opportunities after the film include the three Fs of family, friendship and forgiveness.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending