Movie Reviews
Movie Review – Dune: Part Two
Read Time:4 Minute, 32 Second
I have read all of Frank Herbert’s DUNE books many times, and a few that were written by his son Brian. I can unequivocally say that the DUNE is my favorite science fiction series. The depth of the universe that Herbert creates is rivaled only by Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings. This is why it is so hard to recreate DUNE for the screen. If I had a choice, I would have preferred that DUNE were created as a streaming mini-series that could have taken as much time as needed to tell the story. The visuals and music may not have been as spectacular as what Denis Villeneuve was able to pull off, but the story could have explored the depths of the characters and plot much more deeply.
What I love about the movie
What I love most about Denis Villeneuve’s DUNE is the visuals. The mood Villeneuve creates with his cinematic eye provides hints into the depth of the story that cannot be told through dialog or acting. Arrakis, the planet DUNE, is a character in the book, and Villeneuve treats it as such. I think I might agree with someone who said that Arrakis is the best-developed character in the movie.
—–Content continues below——
Every actor performs magnificently. Of course, the actors deserve credit for their talent, but I believe that the only way to get great acting from an entire cast is through great script and great direction.
What I dislike about the movie
I’m not one who thinks that any movie based on a book should try to be completely faithful to the source material. Each medium should stand on its own. That being said, there are things that are changed in the movie that I don’t think transfer. The most glaring is that Gurney Halleck was convinced that Lady Jessica was the traitor and not Dr. Yueh. That was instrumental to the motivation for Paul to take the water of life. Speaking of which, in the book, Lady Jessica did not want her son to take the water of life. For that matter, neither did Paul. It was only done after much trepidation. This plot line is completely removed from the movie. The Harkonnens launch an attack on Sietch Tabr and destroy it; Paul says, “Well, I didn’t see that coming. I guess I should take the water of life so that I can see the future more clearly.” That’s about how glibbly the movie treats it whereas in the book it’s a crucial decision that has enormous repercussions.
Also, Alia is born in the book and she’s the one who kills the Baron. The events in the movie are massively compressed as compared to the book. The events in the book span about four years. The events in the movie are compressed into less than nine months since Jessica is pregnant when she arrives on Arrakis and Alia is yet to be born by the end.
I’m also not sure what to think of the changes made to Chani and the relationship between Paul and Chani. On the one hand I like that Chani has more agency in the book. That works well for the story, but now I’m unsure how they will make amends without diminishing Chani’s agency. Villeneuve has said that he is already working on the script for Children of Dune and so Paul and Chani will have to have a reconciliation before they can actually have children. I’m going to guess that the third movie will pick up a number of years into the future, just as the book does. But to have Paul and Chani fix things off-screen now would be weak sauce.
I wish more details were given to the motivations of the characters. As I mentioned earlier, Frank Herbert created a detailed universe filled with conflict and did a masterful job of putting his characters in situations where they were forced to make sacrifices. Paul did not want to be the Kwisatz Haderach. He only chose that path as a last resort. The movie expressed his fear of taking the water of life, but the motivation for taking that risk wasn’t sufficiently expressed in the movie.
Conclusion
I’m glad that Villeneuve took on the daunting task of making DUNE. It’s hard to be critical given the constraints of cramming twenty hours of material into the five hours of DUNE 1&2. The visuals and music are masterpieces. With any hope this will inspire someone else to tackle the source material someday and give it the proper attention to detail it requires.
Grade: B
About The Peetimes: I think the first two Peetimes are the best, but none of them are bad. The only issue is with the forth Peetime, there is an important scene that begins as the Peetime ends that you don’t want to miss.
There are no extra scenes during, or after, the end credits of Dune: Part Two.
| Rated: | (PG-13) Sequences of Strong Violence | Brief Strong Language | Some Suggestive Material |
| Genres: | Action, Adventure, Drama |
| Starring: | Florence Pugh, Timothée Chalamet, Rebecca Ferguson |
| Director: | Denis Villeneuve |
| Writer(s): | Denis Villeneuve, Jon Spaihts, Frank Herbert |
| Language: | English |
| Country: | United States, Canada |
Plot
Duke Paul Atreides joins the Fremen and begins a spiritual and martial journey to become Muad’dib, while trying to prevent the horrible but inevitable future he’s witnessed: a Holy War in his name, spreading throughout the known universe.
Don’t miss your favorite movie moments because you have to pee or need a snack. Use the RunPee app (Androidor iPhone) when you go to the movies. We have Peetimes for all wide release films every week, including DUNE part II, Drive Away Dolls, and coming soon King Fu Pana, The American Society of Magical Negroes, Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire, and Godzilla x Kong: The new Empire and many others. We have literally thousands of Peetimes—from classic movies through today’s blockbusters. You can also keep up with movie news and reviews on our blog, or by following us on Twitter @RunPee.
If there’s a new film out there, we’ve got your bladder covered.
Creator and developer of the RunPee app. When something doesn’t work right in the app it’s pretty much his fault. 🙂
Aspiring author. Would like to finish his “Zombie Revelations” trilogy if he could break away for working on RunPee and the cottage he’s building for RunPee Mom.
Movie Reviews
Sisu: Road to Revenge
The lethal and tenacious Aatami Korpi returns in this sequel to 2022’s Sisu. Like its predecessor, Sisu: Road to Revenge offers up nonstop, gory hyper-violence as the old soldier shoots and stabs his way through the Soviet Union’s Red Army to avenge his family’s murder. Paired with all the bloodshed is a handful of f-words and some drinking, as well.
Movie Reviews
Movie Review: “Sisu: Road to Revenge” takes a Wrong Turn or Three

I am an audience of one at a late afternoon “preview” matinee of “Sisu 2,” aka “Sisu: Road to Revenge,” the sequel to the savage sleeper hit by Finnish carnage Jalmari Helander.
Do the locals know something I don’t? Or are the good folks in “The Last Capital of the Confederacy” showing their red ball cap displeasure at a movie about mowing down Russians by staying home?
I’m guessing it’s the fact that Screen Gems’ marketing didn’t spend enough to move the needle even a centimeter that dampened enthusiasm, as nobody knows about it.
That’s no big deal, because this sequel is inferior in pretty much every way to the original “Sisu,” which came out of nowhere back in 2023 and which takes its title from a Finnish word that more of less means unfettered rage. It’s not on a par with Helander’s “Rare Exports” Santa-horror splatter film either. He’s due for a misstep. Here it is.
“Road to Revenge” brings back our non-speaking, unstoppable and unkillable Finnish commando Korpi (Jorma Tommila), this time out to haul the pieces to his house across the Russian border after the end of World War II.
When your anti-hero is “unstoppable” and “unkillable,” that lowers the stakes. A lot.
Throw in feeble pacing and thus no urgency to its story of driving, shooting, stabbing and missle-launching his way through legions of belligerant Russians, fresh from their triumph in “The Great Patriotic War,” and you’ve got a thriller whose only creative bits are random moments of Russian-mutilating and murdering.
Remember, the vodka/borscht-folk and their dictator sided with the Nazis at the beginning of WWII, only to F-around and find out you can never trust a Nazi. And the Russians further earned their history’s bad-guys status by invading Finland at the start of the war, and paying dearly for their miscalculation, at least for a time.
The Soviet Russians annexed Finnish territory at war’s end, and that’s where Korpi lived. So he’s got his passport and his battered, oversized military truck and he’s aiming to move the logs of his old homestead, where his family was slaughtered, to a new location across the new border.
Ivan doesn’t want him to get away with it.
The stages of his quest are broken into superfluous “chapters” like “Old Enemies,” “Motor Mayhem:” and “Incoming.” The dialogue, almost all of it by a Russian tormentor (Stephen Lang) who commanded the troops who failed to finish off the Finn in the first film, is every bit as pointless.
“Unleash Hell,” like they haven’t already. “Keep your eyes open,” the most worthless command cliche of them all. And “Look at me,” served up as if he isn’t looking at you.
Duels against armored commandos on motorcycles (!?), airborne fighter bombers and the like ensue. Our hero takes another licking and keeps on ticking. The Russians? Let the body count commence, Comrades!
I laughed at a few of the more audacious butcherings, but that was early on. The narrative settles into a slog in the middle acts and no pull-out-the-stops train ride finale could drag it out of the mud.
Rating: R, graphic violence, pretty much start to finish, profanity
Cast: Jorma Tommila, Richard Brake and Stephen Lang.
Credits: Scripted and directed by Jalmari Helander. A Screen Gems release.
Running time: 1:29
Movie Reviews
Wicked: For Good Movie Review: Ariana Grande Shines In A Solid But Weaker-Than-The-Original Finale!
Star Cast: Ariana Grande, Cynthia Erivo, Jeff Goldblum, Jonathan Bailey, and Michelle Yeoh.
Director: Jon M. Chu
What’s Good: Wicked: For Good is definitely a showpiece when it comes to production values, and so, every single frame is beautiful to look at and the ultimate Wizard of Oz experience when it comes to visuals.
What’s Bad: The film is slower than the first, and it feels, especially when the new songs don’t hit like the ones in the previous instalment ,and dialogue feels like a lot of filler.
Loo Break: Anywhere in the first act, as the film moves so slowly that you can probably go and come back and not miss anything.
Watch or Not?: If you loved the first one, then yes, you need to see this and close the cycle.
Language: English (with subtitles).
Available On: Theaters
Runtime: 137 Minutes
User Rating:
Opening:
Wicked: For Good Movie Review: Script Analysis
Wicked: For Good is a solid film, there is no doubt about that, you just have to look at the powerful visuals, and the entire production value, but the script might be the weakest aspect of the film, especially when it comes to structure and dialogue, which affects the pacing, making the first two acts of this musical epic feel like it could do with a couple more drafts to make the story tighter, and the flow a lot more natural.
As it is, the first two acts move a snail’s pace, and the songs simply don’t match the quality and catchiness of the songs in the first two acts of the first film, here, the songs feel like they are there just to make the film longer, and it is hard to remember one that is simply memorable enough to sing along. Fans of the original musical will probably have a lot more fun with this aspect of the film, but as a newcomer, I did feel a drop in quality on the musical side.
The dialogue also does a lot of damage to the film, as it feels like everything is delivered in two or three lines that are too long, when it could have been conveyed in a simpler and more efficient way. It just doesn’t work, and while the actors do their best, the material doesn’t hold up. Nevertheless, some jokes here and there truly land, and the film does tell a compelling, complete story, which is a lot more than many other films do today.
The third act also feels quite rushed, and the connections to the original Wizard of Oz film, and the characters from that story deserved a lot more, because they are so legendary and iconic, that for some reason this movie feels like it should just move away from them as fast as it can, hurting the overall impact of the story, and the character growth.
Wicked: For Good Movie Review: Star Performance
Cynthia Erivo is quite solid in here, and she is plotwise, the main character, but let’s be real, this is the Ariana Grande show, who basically steals the show in every single scenes she is in, not only with her powerful voice but also with her solid acting abilities, she just has it, when it comes to presence, delivery and charisma.
The rest of the cast is quite good. Bailey does some terrifying things in the film and effectively creates all the darkness it needs, while Goldblum’s Oz is just right – nothing to talk about, but definitely his performance, along with the rest from all the other actors, doesn’t hurt the film; it elevates it.
Wicked: For Good Movie Review: Direction, Music
Jon M. Chu started as a relatively standard director. Still, he has definitely graduated to the big leagues with these two films, as the scale of everything just goes out of the window when it comes to the visuals and the camera’s placement, which is always in the perfect spot to show it. Really, the world-building that Chu and his team have created here is outstanding.
The music, as we said before isn’t as good or memorable as the first film which really hurts the experience because this is a musical and I thought the best was being safe for last in the song department, of course, it will be a matter of taste, as it is everything but this is definitely one of the biggest negative points for the film. Nevertheless, the performers are truly going out of their way to create something extraordinary, so there is really nothing to criticize regarding the actors, dancers and singers themselves.
Wicked: For Good Movie Review: The Last Word
Wicked: For Good closes this adventure in a solid manner, although the overall package feels weaker than the first film, which is disappointing. However, Jon. M. Chu, his team, and his cast demonstrate that they truly care about the project, and it shows on the screen as the film finally delivers on being entertaining, grandiose, and visually stunning. It could have been better, but what is there is truly remarkable.
Wicked: For Good Trailer
Wicked: For Good releases on 21 November, 2025.
Share with us your experience of watching Wicked: For Good.
Must Read: Now You See Me: Now You Don’t Movie Review: The Strange Case Of A Sequel That Nobody Wanted & Many Had Already Forgotten!
Follow Us: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | Google News
-
Business1 week agoDeveloper plans to add a hotel and hundreds of residences to L.A. Live
-
Southwest1 week agoFury erupts after accused teen sex predator dodges prison; families swarm courthouse demanding judge’s head
-
Business5 days ago
Fire survivors can use this new portal to rebuild faster and save money
-
World1 week agoVideo: Russia’s First A.I. Humanoid Robot Crashes Into the Tech Scene
-
Politics1 week agoMajor Pentagon contractor executive caught in child sex sting operation
-
World4 days agoFrance and Germany support simplification push for digital rules
-
Technology1 week agoAI-powered scams target kids while parents stay silent
-
World1 week agoEuropean Commission unveils its big plan to save democracy





