Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Is Nope a Yup? Critics Can’t Decide

Published

on

Is Nope a Yup? Critics Can’t Decide

Photograph: Common Footage/YouTube

The primary reactions to Jordan Peele’s newest horror flick are in, and thus far not one in every of them is a thirsty ode to stars Daniel Kaluuya and Steven Yeun? Okay, okay, let’s get severe for a second. Nope is Peele’s extremely anticipated third function — his first 2017 social thriller, Get Out, was a runaway hit, whereas the horror film Us, although extra divisive, managed to keep away from a sophomore stoop two years later — and critics are divided. Based mostly on the primary evaluations, Nope delves into the scams of illustration, the risks of Hollywood’s glimmer, and our nation’s growing numbness to violence. Whereas critics overwhelmingly reward the movie’s eerie and expansive cinematography from IMAX grasp Hoyte van Hoytema, some evaluations discover the plotting oversaturated but thinly sketched. Others discover the sibling dynamic between Kaluuya and Keke Palmer’s characters missing chemistry, whereas Yeun’s Ricky “Jupe” Park deserves a separate film to rigorously discover his psyche. It’s both Peele’s Jaws or an satisfying entry to an in any other case sensible profession. Listed here are the early takeaways.

Nope is a piece of sly devastation from writer-director Jordan Peele that, like his earlier movies Get Out and Us, is a horror comedy with a speculative premise — on this case, by the use of the saucer-shaped UFO lurking within the clouds concerning the Haywood Ranch in Agua Dulce. Not like in Get Out, the place Kaluuya’s character Chris discovers he’s been lured right into a lure by a cabal of body-snatching white liberals, or Us, the place malevolent doppelgängers swarm out of the earth like collectors coming for a long-overdue invoice, in Nope, the hazard is, to a sure diploma, opt-in. The title is a slasher-movie joke, a sentiment to be howled at characters who traipse obliviously to their doom by venturing into unlit basements or following mysterious sounds into the woods.” — Alison Willmore, Vulture

Advertisement

“Even when elements of it don’t gel, Nope is a rapturous watch. This movie, a couple of pair of sibling horse wranglers who encounter an uncanny power on their ranch, covers a variety of themes: Hollywood’s obsession with and dependancy to spectacle, the USA’ inurement to violence, the siren name of capitalism, the legacy of the Black cowboy, and the parable of the American West. Aided by a robust forged, led impressively by Daniel Kaluuya, Keke Palmer, Steven Yeun, and Brandon Perea, Peele plunges us right into a cavernous, twisted actuality.” — Lovia Gyarkye, The Hollywood Reporter

“This bizarre and wild Californian expanse is the thrillingly charged setting of Nope, a movie that does for open skies what Jaws did for the seaside, and The Wicker Man for Hebridean getaways. The third function from Jordan Peele, the director of Get Out and Us, it repeats the successful recipe of these very good earlier works: a massively entertaining floor with wealthy and troubling substance effervescent beneath. It’s a summer season blockbuster which hauls the style proper again to its Nineteen Seventies New Hollywood roots — a Shut Encounters of the Third Form with the Spielbergian heat and surprise swapped for skin-prickling disquiet and mordant satirical wit.” — Robbie Collin, the Telegraph

“There are many daring and riveting photographs in Nope; weird dreamlike iterations. Kaluuya and Palmer have, singly, a cool self-possession and tackle to the digicam, however no actually compelling chemistry as siblings or the rest. There’s something clotted and heavy about this movie, with sadly not sufficient of the humour for which Peele justly grew to become celebrated in his double-act days with Keegan-Michael Key. It’s not the optimistic response I needed to have.” — Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian

Nope appears to need to name out the failures of recent media whereas additionally reveling in its capability. No less than Peele’s model will not be empty maximalism, not like a lot different leisure and manipulated actuality dashing at us always. There are actual concepts in Nope, albeit ones that incessantly circle again on themselves, that exist in complicated contradiction to 1 one other. Such confusion is actually the prerogative of — and even welcomed in — a movie as dense as this one. However Nope’s concluding minutes don’t deliver the movie to any satisfying place; it hurries to an ending in a manner that implies many minutes, if not hours, of film left on the cutting-room flooring.” — Richard Lawson, Vainness Truthful

“Whereas Jordan Peele has quick grow to be probably the most related and worthwhile of recent American filmmakers, Nope is the primary time that he’s been afforded a finances match for a real blockbuster spectacle, and that’s precisely what he’s created with it. But when this sensible, muscular, and massively entertaining flying saucer freak-out is such an old-school delight that it begins with a shout-out to early cinema pioneer Eadweard Muybridge (earlier than paying homage to extra direct influences like Shut Encounters of the Third Form), it’s additionally a totally fashionable popcorn film for and about viewers who’ve been inundated with — and hooked on — Twenty first-century visions of real-life terror.” — David Ehrlich, IndieWire

Advertisement

Nope itself begins flying off in several instructions. It’s a part of the movie’s design — and, in a manner, its racial consciousness — that OJ and Emerald are too mistrustful of mainstream white society to get any authorities concerned. So we’re spared the kind of meddlesome-U.S.-government boilerplate plot that weighed down a film like Arrival. But Nope doesn’t have a plot a lot as a collection of happenings that spill out in an impressionistic and arbitrary manner. Logic usually takes a again seat, and that has the unlucky impact of lessening our involvement.” — Owen Gleiberman, Selection

“In Jordan Peele’s Nope, a UFO sighting supplies an exploration of the predatory facet of the leisure trade, whereas changing into one thing else completely in Peele’s arms. Nope is Peele at his most imaginative, a narrative of two characters who refuse to be pinned down from a director who refuses the identical. It’s a giant, shocking evolution of the traditional Hollywood UFO story in correctly cosmic dimensions. It’s nice, and no matter you’re anticipating, you’ll seemingly be mistaken.” — Jeff Ewing, Forbes

Nope isn’t a very scary UFO movie however is successfully unnerving. Peele performs together with his viewers in devilish methods earlier than going massive and daring with the visuals (significantly Hoyte van Hoytema’s dazzling cinematography) in addition to the white-knuckle rigidity. Simply don’t go in anticipating Get Out or Us: Peele’s first two standouts are targeted in human explorations, whereas Nope is extra scattershot with its storytelling. The filmmaker touches on an array of subplots and intriguing concepts (the damaging indifference of present enterprise, mankind’s disparate reactions to a life-altering state of affairs) however makes an attempt too many between a visceral, gripping first half and the extra typical and rousing second.” — Mind Truitt, USA Right this moment

“Whereas Nope may not be as overt in its messaging as Get Out or Us, Peele explores concepts about the great thing about filmmaking and sensible results, trauma, and the way Hollywood can simply get rid of its artists. However Peele does all this with a subtlety that he’s by no means proven at this stage earlier than, making these components important to the story, however with out being too overt with the purpose he’s making an attempt to make. Whereas this is perhaps his most bombastic movie when it comes to what he’s making an attempt, it’s additionally could also be his most understated in its messaging.” — Ross Bonaime, Collider

“Peele has not often been so blunt in his social commentary.” — Caryn James, BBC

Advertisement

Nope will not be involved with explaining a lot. As a substitute, the main focus is on spectacle and the herculean emotional and bodily tolls that come from witnessing it, or, even worse, making an attempt to seize it on-camera. The central object of fascination for Nope’s ensemble is a saucer-shaped ufo that’s tooling across the hills outdoors Los Angeles. And but Peele isn’t just making an ingenious sci-fi thriller. Nope is tinged with the acidic satire that suffused his final two motion pictures, as Peele examines why the simplest strategy to course of horror as of late is to show it into breathtaking leisure.” — David Sims, The Atlantic

“By way of all of this, Nope sees Peele distinguish between the making of leisure for an viewers — a ravenous, uncaring beast, bloodying its enamel with the spectacle of different individuals’s lives — and the act of filmmaking for your self, capturing one thing unimaginable on-camera, making a dream actual. Within the exploration of those concepts, the mythmaking of the Haywood ranch dovetails with Peele tearing away traditional cinematic imagery from white-supremacist, manifest-destiny roots. The director repurposes it as a spectacle of the extra triumphant sort, framing Kaluuya as a cowboy in a bright-orange The Scorpion King crew hoodie. In defining such liberation he wrangles movie and tv manufacturing historical past because the Haywoods do horses, pulling in all of his favorite cinema and lovingly demolishing and rebuilding it. Nope is as a lot a celebration of what’s nice about movie as it’s a parody of its monstrous tendencies.” — Kambole Campbell, Empire

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

The Smile Man review: Sarath Kumar's film fails to realise its full potential

Published

on

The Smile Man review: Sarath Kumar's film fails to realise its full potential

A serial killer on the loose. The killer has a pattern – he/she brutally maims the target, leaving them with a gory smiling face. Enter a high-ranking police officer diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, who has only one year before his memory fades forever. Now, this is a story that has the potential to be developed into a high-octane thriller with twists and turns. But, does Sarath Kumar’s 150th film, The Smile Man, live up to expectations? Let’s find out!

Chidambaram Nedumaran (Sarath Kumar), a CBCID officer, is recuperating from an injury. To make matters worse, he’s been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s and has just one year left to preserve his memories. Before his injury, he was involved in the investigation of The Smile Man case. While he is trying to adapt to his new lifestyle with memory loss, a series of similar killings take place, forcing Chidambaram to reopen the case.

This time, however, Chidambaram must battle his declining health while investigating the case to unmask the killer. Why was the Smile Man case closed before his injury? Is there anything more than what meets the eye? Who is the killer, and what is their motive?

Director duo Syam and Praveen’s The Smile Man has a solid story at its core, though it might remind you of thrillers, Ratsasan and Por Thozhil. A serial killer story has a predictable template, but a film can stand out from the crowd because of the way the story and screenplay are treated. That way, The Smile Man is an illogical thriller that reeks of amateur making. The killer leaves a smiling scarred face on the victims and the pattern should ideally shock the audience. But, the poor prosthetic makeup hardly makes it look menacing.

Here’s the trailer:

Advertisement

The portrayal of journalists in The Smile Man is poor, anf the dialogue is one of the film’s biggest drawbacks. For example, the CBCID officer casually throws around words like ‘copycat killer’ without any solid basis. The reasons given are so futile that it forces you to not take the characters seriously.

The killer’s face is hidden for half of the film, and when it is eventually revealed, it fails to deliver any excitement. Similarly, the killer’s motive and his backstory are told and not shown. The justification hardly makes sense and one could spot a lot of logical loopholes.

TThe film’s music tries to evoke emotions but falls flat. Before each murder, a growl indicates what’s coming, and before the killer strikes, the music warns you. This removes the element of surprise, which is crucial to a good thriller.

Sarath Kumar is the only actor who gives his all in an attempt to salvage this poorly executed story. The rest of the performances, except for those by George Maryan and Kalaiyarasan, make little impact.

Advertisement

The Smile Man is a lost opportunity considering the potential it showed. If only the screenplay had been handled better, the film could have had a much stronger impact.

2 out of 5 stars for The Smile Man.

Published On:

Dec 27, 2024

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: “Mufasa,” everything we didn’t need to know about “The Lion King”

Published

on

Movie Review: “Mufasa,” everything we didn’t need to know about “The Lion King”

The CGI animated savannahs, rivers and rock formations of Africa are photo-real, and the animals populating it have never been more realistically rendered than they are in “Mufasa: The Lion King.”

Disney felt the need to have the lions, warthog and meercat’s lips move when they sing, which is saying something.

But let’s keep this review short and not-exactly-sweet, unlike this boardroom-ordered prequel to one of Disney’s most popular intellectual properties. “Mufasa: The Lion King” never makes the case that it’s a story that needed to be told or a movie that needed to be made.

It’s about how Mufasa got separated from his birth-parents’ pride of lions, and joined another, becoming “brothers” with the lion cub who “saved” him, but who will come to be called “Scar.”

So the object of this prequel is to show how Mufasa became Lion King and how Scar got his scar and became the bitter rival in their pride.

The “story” is framed as a “story” Rafiki the ape (John Sani) tells Simba’s cub, and that cub’s protectors/babysitters, Timon (Billy Eichner) and Pumbaa (Seth Rogen).

Advertisement

The tale is of another coming-of-age quest, with two young-lions on their own this time, paired-up, depending on each other, on the run from a pride of albino lions led by the killer Kiros (Mads Mikkelsen).

There are new songs of a far more forgettable nature than those from the animated classic “The Lion King.”

“The circle is broken,” he growls, and we believe him.

There are harrowing moments of drama in their quest, but there’s precious little humor to the movie, all of it provided by the same duo who have always been the comic relief, Timon and Pumbaa.

“We’ve been singing ‘Hakuna Matata’ since forever!”

Advertisement

“Who hasn’t?

The messaging, about taking in “strays,” and that “To be lost is to learn the way,” is weak tea.

Story failings aside, it’s not a bad movie. But “Mufasa” never lets us forget the limited-entertainment-value of the entire undertaking. Oscar winner Barry Jenkins (“Moonlight”) was hired to direct, but aside from a few voice casting decisions (Keith David, Anika Noni Rose, with Aaron Pierre and Kelvin Harrison, Jr. as Mufasa and Taka/Scar), he brings nothing to this that makes a difference.

Disney’s tech/animators telling their bosses that “Yes, we can make it look like a movie with real singing lions and bathing hippos on the veldt without using real animals or shooting on location” is no justification for showcasing that technology.

Story matters, and this one didn’t need to be told.

Advertisement

Rating: PG, some violence

Cast: The voices of Aaron Pierre, Kelvin Harrison, Jr., Tiffany Boone, John Kani, Mads Mikkelsen, Thandiwe Newton, Keith David, Billy Eichner and Seth Rogen.

Credits: Directed by Barry Jenkins, scripted by Jeff Nathanson, based on characters from Disney’s “The Lion King.” A Walt Disney release.

Running time: 1:58

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Better Man (2024) – Movie Review

Published

on

Better Man (2024) – Movie Review

Better Man, 2024.

Directed by Michael Gracey.
Starring Robbie Williams, Jonno Davies, Steve Pemberton, Damon Herriman, Raechelle Banno, Alison Steadman, Kate Mulvany, Frazer Hadfield, Tom Budge, Anthony Hayes, Jake Simmance, Jesse Hyde, Liam Head, Chase Vollenweider, Rose Flanagan, Jack Sherran, Karina Banno, Asmara Feik, Leo Harvey-Elledge, Elyssia Koulouris, Frazer Hadfield, Chris Gun, Ben Hall, Kaela Daffara, and Chase Vollenweider.

SYNOPSIS:

Follow Robbie Williams’ journey from childhood, to being the youngest member of chart-topping boyband Take That, through to his unparalleled achievements as a record-breaking solo artist – all the while confronting the challenges that stratospheric fame and success can bring.

Advertisement

During a conversation exploring the possibility of a biopic, British popstar Robbie Williams told well-regarded musical director Michael Gracey that he saw himself as a monkey performing for others. That became the window into telling the story of this singer/songwriter with Better Man, a film that, as the title implies, also shows that Robbie Williams is self-aware of his flaws, mistakes, and shortcomings without being afraid to put them front and center. Yes, rather than go through the arduous casting process, Michael Gracey ran with that comment literally, making the creative choice to have the pop star played by a CGI monkey (voiced by Jonno Davies, with Robbie Williams lending his vocals.)

It’s a smart move to roll a short clip of subject and filmmaker conversing before the film starts proper, not just because other parts of the world might not be familiar with Robbie Williamss music (consistently accidentally reading it as a biopic about musician Robin Williams if you’re anything like me), but also since this is such a bold concept for a biopic that it’s helpful to get an idea of what this man looks like and the personality he puts out there before it’s all monkey business.

Going one step further, this turns out to not fall into the trappings of a flailing gimmick but ties into themes of pressures of the music industry, fame causing stunted behavior, family drama, and an unflinching portrayal of self that doesn’t smooth over any rough edges. Better Man is an invigorating biopic; a shot of adrenaline to the most overplayed, clichéd genre. After this, no one should be allowed to make biopics (at least ones about musicians) unless they have an equally creative angle or some compelling X factor behind it. Simply put, this film puts most recent offerings from the genre to shame, especially the ones that get trotted out at the end of every year as familiar awards bait.

Even though the life trajectory and story beats aren’t anything new to anyone who has ever seen a biopic about a musician before, it gets to be told with boundless imagination, typically coming from several dazzling musical sequences. Not only are they dynamic in presentation (whether it be jubilantly unfolding across the streets of London or something more melancholy regarding fatherly abandonment), but they are sometimes highwire concepts themselves; Better Man has one of the most thrilling, fantastically clever, visually stunning, and exciting takes on battling one’s demons.

The characters (including Robbie’s family, friends, lover, hell, and even Oasis) don’t interact or react to Robbie Williams as a monkey. It’s a visual treat for us (this film would fall apart without the astonishingly expressive technical wizardry from Weta, who already have proven themselves as outstanding in this field when it comes to the recent Planet of the Apes movies) but another personal, self-deprecating, honest interpretation of how Robbie saw himself during these life stages. Initially, this feels like it will end up as a missed opportunity for further creativity or humor. One of the more surprising elements here is that the filmmakers (with Michael Gracey co-writing alongside Oliver Cole and Simon Gleeson) are playing this material straight and not going for laughs. That confidence pays off, allowing a maximalist, melodramatic side to come out with sincere, absorbing emotional heft.

Advertisement

That story follows a standard rise and fall structure, with Robbie Williams finding inspiration from his initially supportive singing father (Steve Pemberton), exhibiting a relatable drive to make his grandmother (Alison Steadman proud, getting his start in boy band Take That before his insecurities and worsening substance abuse and egocentric behavior gets him kicked out, stumbling into a rocky relationship with Nicole Appleton (Raechelle Banno), and then not only finding the courage to put some meaningful lyrics out into the world through a successful solo career but managing the anxieties that come with performing in front of humongous crowds while constantly struggling with drug addiction. 

Some of those aspects feel glossed over and aren’t as explored as they possibly could have been (the film is already 135 minutes, but some of it is given a broad strokes treatment), but it’s affecting anyway due to the creativity, artistry, musical numbers, and blunt honesty enhancing those character dynamics. Better Man is a biopic that starts with a confessional about being a narcissist and having a punchable face and ends up somewhere beautifully moving that perfectly captures the essence of that title. There is also a healthy dose of Frank Sinatra here, given that he was a major source of inspiration for Robbie Williams, so let’s say he and Michael Gracey did this biopic their way, and the result is something no one should want any other way.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association and the Critics Choice Association. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews, follow my Twitter or Letterboxd, or email me at MetalGearSolid719@gmail.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading

Trending