Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Iravin Nizhal Movie Review: Iravin Nizhal’s impressive filmmaking overcomes ineffective writing

Published

on

Iravin Nizhal Movie Review: Iravin Nizhal’s impressive filmmaking overcomes ineffective writing
Iravin Nizhal Film Synopsis: A person on the run seems to be again on his crime-filled life, the individuals who have formed it up, his sins and his one final hope at redemption.

Iravin Nizhal Film Evaluation: If there may be one factor you’ll be able to all the time make sure of with a Parthiban movie is that it’s going to by no means be a lazy, inconsiderate effort. The truth is, too many concepts is a defining attribute of his movies. His fixed quest to present his viewers a special expertise is what makes his movies one thing to look ahead to (and barely dread, as a result of his failed experiments, like Koditta Idangalai Nirappuga, have that what-was-he-even-smoking high quality).

Iravin Nizhal, like the perfect of Parthiban’s movies, is not a movie you’ll be able to ever fault for lack of effort. The filmmaker truly makes us see this effort with a making-of characteristic that’s performed earlier than the precise movie. The movie is alleged to be ‘the world’s first single-shot non-linear movie’, and on this nearly 30-minute characteristic, we see the blood, sweat and tears (each actually and figuratively) that had gone into making this movie in a single 96-minute-long unbroken shot. You typically hear filmmakers speak about how a lot onerous work they’ve put into their movies, however right here, we see it – the inventiveness in constructing the world of this movie, the heartbreaks when minor errors end result within the staff having to shoot the movie throughout (one crane error on the 92nd minute would have positively been soul-crushing), and the jubilation once they lastly handle to get all of it proper within the twenty third take.

Transferring on to the movie, it opens with Nandu (Parthiban), a movie financier, studying that the cops are about to arrest him, and making a run, with a gun, which he hopes to make use of on Patamananda (Robo Shankar), a faux godman, who’s a kind of to have out him on this precarious place. As he lays ready for his goal at a dilapidated ashram, he recounts his eventful life, the individuals who pushed him into darkness, his sins and the one flicker of sunshine that is nonetheless a part of his life.

When it comes to content material, Iravin Nizhal is an too acquainted story of the rise and fall of a person. We see how a toddler orphaned at beginning is formed up the societal forces, pressured right into a world of crime for survival, how love helps him to get out of it and the way he’s pushed again into the ceaseless pit of darkness. We see the ladies who stroll into his life – Lakshmi (Sneha Kumar), Chilakamma (Brigida Saga), Parvathi (Sai Priyanka Ruth), and Premakumari (Varalaxmi Sarathkumar) – shaping it up positively and negatively. We get the Parthibanisms (there may be even a nod to his first movie Pudhiya Paadhai). On the entire, it’s previous wine in a brand new, quirkily designed bottle.

Advertisement

However it’s the kind that makes the movie really attention-grabbing and distinctive. Like his earlier movie Oththa Seruppu Measurement 7, which experimented with only one actor within the solid, this movie additionally looks like one thing that will have labored as a stage play. Regardless of the flowery units, the movie is targeted on one character, who additionally occurs to be the narrator. Despite the fact that we now have 5 actors (Chandru and Anandha Krishnan get the utmost display time) taking part in this character at completely different levels of his life, the voice belongs to Parthiban, which makes it onerous to shake off the Oththa Seruppu vibe.

However to his credit score, the filmmaker would not make the movie static. Arthur Wilson’s digicam is consistently on the transfer, and the impact that the movie give us is that of flitting inside an individual’s recollections. One second we’re in 1971, when he’s simply an toddler, and the following we now have him as a person counting his (ill-gotten) riches. On the draw back, this steady motion additionally makes it onerous for us to get into the character’s footwear and expertise his feelings. Many a time, we want for the narration and the digicam to decelerate. Due to the way in which it’s designed, the movie (and the digicam) appears to be solely in shifting on to the following scene, and would not allow us to to totally soak up these feelings, even when a personality is sexually abused or dies.

This strategy actually robs the movie of being an emotionally impactful one. In single-shot movies like Victoria or 1917 (which technically has a number of photographs stitched to make it seem to be a one-shot movie), the character of the content material dictated their kind. An evening of partying takes a darkish flip.. A younger soldier has to ship a message within the midst of a struggle.. These premises lend themselves to such methods as a result of they’re primarily in regards to the what-next. However right here, it’s primarily in regards to the how – how did Nandu end up the way in which he did and the way will he discover redemption – which requires deeper writing and immersive filmmaking.

That mentioned, Parthiban has clearly talked about in his pre-release interviews that his solely intention behind doing this movie was to search out out if a non-linear story could possibly be filmed as a single-shot movie. Just like the makers of the early silent movies, who had been extra concerned with exploring the brand new know-how that was cinema and discovering out the way it could possibly be used, which got here in useful for those who got here after them, Parthiban has, with this movie, damaged a path for future filmmakers to experiment with unconventional storytelling utilizing the single-shot approach. There are a number of moments while you marvel on the smoothness with which the scenes transition from one time interval to the following. Parthiban additionally makes use of music (AR Rahman, whose stirring rating is sort of a ray of sunshine on this movie’s darkish world) sound results cleverly to make us overlook that whole movie has been shot in a single place, inside the massive set that we’re proven within the making-of video. In that sense, this ‘undertaking’ is unquestionably successful as Parthiban achieves what he got down to do.

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Wicked movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

Wicked movie review & film summary (2024) | Roger Ebert

The razzle-dazzle that’s Jon M. Chu’s bread and butter is on glorious display in “Wicked,” the big-screen version of the beloved Broadway musical.  

When it’s all about the spectacle of big, splashy production numbers, this prequel to “The Wizard of Oz” is thrilling, whether we’re in Munchkinland, the Emerald City or the campus of Shiz University, where a young Wicked Witch of the West and Glinda the Good Witch of the North first cross paths. As we’ve seen from the director’s previous films including “Crazy Rich Asians” and “In the Heights,” Chu is uniquely adept at presenting an enormous song-and-dance extravaganza without getting lost in it. His sense of pacing and perspective draw us in and center us within the swirling fantasy. 

It helps greatly that he has deeply talented stars in Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande: magnetic multi-hyphenates who can meet every physical and emotional challenge of these iconic characters. Following in the footsteps of Idina Menzel and Kristin Chenoweth would seem like a daunting task, but Erivo and Grande bring their own vocal power and dramatic interpretation to the roles of Elphaba and Glinda, respectively. You truly feel the friendship between these opposites, particularly in one beautiful, wordless dance sequence where they forge their unlikely bond, which is moving in its understatement. That’s the foundation of this story, so it’s crucial that we know their connection is true for its destruction to be meaningful. 

Far less effective is the way Chu, working from a script by Winnie Holzman and Dana Fox, based on the novel by Gregory Maguire, wedges in the movie’s heavier themes of authoritarianism. Yes, they are baked into the story: We know from watching 1939’s “The Wizard of Oz” countless times that the wizard is a con artist who rules by fear. His deception is literally one of smoke and mirrors. That’s all in the source material of the “Wicked” stage production, as well, for which Holzman wrote the book and Stephen Schwartz wrote the music and lyrics. Here, in film form, the tone swings awkwardly between upbeat wonder and dark oppression. This is a world in which minorities are hunted, placed in cages and prevented from speaking, where a charismatic leader (a playfully evil Jeff Goldblum) persecutes a woman of color. It is not subtle, and it feels all-too relevant to our times, despite originating decades ago. It also drags down the energy of this epic tale. 

And yet, overstuffed as the film is at 2 hours and 40 minutes, this is only part one: “Wicked” ends where the intermission occurs in the stage show, with part two coming in November 2025. It’s a lot to ask of an audience. Still, people who love this story and these characters will be delighted, and there’s much here for people who aren’t familiar with the musical but are looking for a cinematic escape around the holidays. 

Advertisement

“Wicked” begins with Grande’s Glinda descending majestically into Munchkinland to inform her enthusiastic fans that the rumors are true: The witch really is dead. Then it flashes back to how she and the green-hued Elphaba (the Wicked Witch’s first name) became unlikely allies in college. Elphaba has always been bullied and ostracized because of the color of her skin; Glinda—or Galinda, as she’s known at this point—is a pretty, pampered mean girl who’s always gotten her way. (Bowen Yang is a hoot as one of her loyal sycophants.) 

But once they’re forced to room together, they eventually realize, to their surprise, that they genuinely see each other in a way no one ever has before. Galinda’s makeover anthem “Popular”—one of the most popular songs from the show—is among the film’s highlights, and a great example of the technical prowess “Wicked” offers. The costume design from Paul Tazewell (“West Side Story”) and production design from longtime Christopher Nolan collaborator Nathan Crowley are exquisite throughout but especially here. Alice Brooks’ cinematography is consistently wondrous, but her use of hot pink lighting as Galinda’s at the height of her power is really evocative.  

Chu’s usual choreographer, Christopher Scott, delivers again with vibrant, inspired moves, particularly in the elaborate “Dancing Through Life,” which takes place in the school’s rotating, multilevel library. “Bridgerton” star Jonathan Bailey gets a chance to show off his musical theater background here, and he’s terrifically charming as the glib Prince Fiyero, the object of both Elphaba and Galinda’s romantic interests. Michelle Yeoh brings elegance and just a hint of danger to her role as Madame Morrible, the university’s sorcery professor. And Peter Dinklage lends gravitas as the resonant voice of Dr. Dillamond, a goat instructor who, like other talking animals in Oz, finds himself increasingly in peril. 

But it’s that connection between Erivo and Grande that gives the film its emotional heft. Erivo does do much with her eyes to convey Elphaba’s sadness and loneliness and, eventually, her hope and determination. There’s a directness about her screen presence that’s immediate and engaging, and of course she can sing the hell out of these demanding songs. Grande meets her note for note and once again displays her comic chops, but it’s the little choices that make her portrayal of the perfect Galinda feel human: a jerky perkiness that’s slightly dorky. The blonde tresses and array of pink dresses scream confidence, but deep down she’s a try-hard whose desire to be liked is her driving motivation. 

As undeniably crowd-pleasing as “Wicked” is in its big moments, these smaller and more intimate details are just as magical. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Kishkindha Kaandam Movie Review

Published

on

Kishkindha Kaandam Movie Review

The Malayalam film Kishkindha Kaandam, directed by Dinjith Ayyathan, hit theaters on September 12, 2024, and quickly became a box office success, earning over ₹70 crore on a modest ₹7 crore budget. With a stellar cast including Asif Ali, Aparna Balamurali, and Vijayaraghavan, this movie has now begun streaming on OTT platform Disney plus Hotstar. Let’s dive into the Kishkindha Kaandam Movie Review to see what makes it stand out.

Plot Overview
Set in a village bordering a forest, the story revolves around Appu Pillai (Vijayaraghavan), a retired army officer living with his son Ajay Chandra (Asif Ali), daughter-in-law Praveena (Vaishnavi Raj), and grandson Chachu (Aarav). Tragedy strikes when Praveena passes away, and Chachu mysteriously disappears.

While the investigation into Chachu’s disappearance forms a crucial part of the narrative, the police station instructs Appu to surrender his licensed gun due to the upcoming elections. However, the gun has been missing for a long time, complicating matters further. The police warn that even a single missing bullet could lead to serious consequences.

As Ajay remarries Aparna (Aparna Balamurali), she moves into the family home and learns that Appu suffers from memory loss. Aparna grows suspicious of Appu’s behavior, particularly his reluctance to let anyone enter his room and his habit of burning items in a secluded area. Her investigation into Chachu’s disappearance and the missing gun forms the crux of the film.

Analysis
Kishkindha Kaandam revolves around three key characters: the father, the son, and the daughter-in-law. Aparna’s desire to find Chachu and bring happiness back to her family drives the first half of the movie. As she uncovers clues linking Appu to Chachu’s disappearance and the missing gun, the tension escalates in the second half.

Advertisement

The narrative cleverly intertwines memory loss, a missing gun, and a child’s disappearance, keeping the audience guessing until the very end. The film’s strength lies in its minimalist approach, focusing on a small cast and localized settings. The title, Kishkindha Kaandam, reflects the village’s unique connection to monkeys, adding a symbolic layer to the plot.

Director Dinjith Ayyathan skillfully maintains suspense without relying on exaggerated drama, keeping the story grounded in realism. This approach makes the twists and turns feel natural and engaging.

Performances
Vijayaraghavan delivers a standout performance as the enigmatic and suspicious Appu Pillai. His portrayal of a man struggling with memory loss while harboring secrets is both compelling and nuanced. Asif Ali shines as Ajay, caught between family responsibilities and professional duties. Aparna Balamurali impresses with her natural acting, convincingly portraying a new bride navigating the complexities of her new family while trying to uncover the truth.

Technical Aspects
Cinematography: Ramesh’s visuals beautifully capture the lush, forested village, enhancing the story’s atmosphere.
Music: Mujeeb Majeed’s haunting background score elevates the suspense.
Editing: Suraj’s crisp editing ensures a tight narrative, particularly in the second half.
Malayalam cinema continues its tradition of seamlessly integrating stories with authentic locations, making the events on screen feel believable and immersive.

Verdict
Kishkindha Kaandam is a captivating mystery thriller with strong performances, a well-crafted screenplay, and stunning visuals. It’s a testament to the power of storytelling and naturalistic filmmaking. This is a movie that can be enjoyed with the whole family.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Stella Stevens: The Last Starlet’ Review: A Loving, Insightful Documentary Tribute to an Underrated Actress

Published

on

‘Stella Stevens: The Last Starlet’ Review: A Loving, Insightful Documentary Tribute to an Underrated Actress

Andrew Stevens pays loving but not hagiographic tribute to his late mother, famed actress Stella Stevens, in his documentary recently showcased at the Fort Lauderdale International Film Festival. The film convincingly makes the case that its subject, best known for her performances in such pictures as The Poseidon Adventure and The Nutty Professor, is severely underrated, both as an actress and social activist. Stella Stevens: The Last Starlet aims to rectify that perception and, thanks to numerous clips of her work and effusive commentary by the likes of Quentin Tarantino and Vivica A. Fox, it succeeds beautifully.

The filmmaker (who appears frequently) admits that his relationship with his mother was rocky, to say the least, in the early years. Born in Yazoo City, Mississippi, Stevens got married at age 16 and had Andrew, her first and only child, six months later. The marriage soon dissolved, and when she moved to Hollywood to pursue an acting career, she took Andrew to California with her illegally. His father and grandfather later showed up and spirited him away, resulting in an ugly custody battle and Andrew not having a real relationship with his mother until he turned 16.

Stella Stevens: The Last Starlet

The Bottom Line

A well-deserved and long overdue cinematic portrait.

Advertisement

Venue: Fort Lauderdale International Film Festival (American Indie)
Director-screenwriter: Andrew Stevens

1 hour 39 minutes

Stevens was soon signed to 20th Century Fox, where she was groomed to be a starlet in the mold of Marilyn Monroe and Mamie Van Doren. Her sexpot image was further confirmed when she appeared as a Playboy centerfold, though she had desperately tried to purchase the nude images back from Hugh Hefner, who refused.

Her career quickly took off thanks to such films as Li’l Abner, in which she played the wonderfully named “Appasionata Von Climax,” and the musical Say One for Me with Bing Crosby, for which she received a Golden Globe award for New Star of the Year.

Advertisement

“Some of the most fun parts I’ve played are nymphomaniacs,” Stevens amusingly points out in one of many interviews featured here. Some of them are shown via archival clips from various talk show appearances, while others are recreated using a lookalike actress (Lindsie Kongsore). While the device is jarring at first, it admittedly breathes life into Stevens’ words. But the filmmaker gets too carried away with it at times, as when he unnecessarily uses an actor to play a film critic reading an excerpt from a review.

There are plenty of juicy anecdotes and revelations in the documentary, one of the most priceless being Stevens’ account of co-star Bobby Darin getting a much noticeable erection while they shot a kissing scene. She also reveals that she had no desire to appear with Elvis Presley in Girls! Girls! Girls! and only agreed to do it after she was promised that she would get to play opposite Montgomery Clift in her next film. The Clift project never materialized, and she could never bring herself to watch the Presley one.

We learn of her many romances, including an affair with the notorious and very much married Hollywood fixer Sidney Korshak and a lengthy relationship with actor Skip Ward, who took financial advantage of her and was frequently unfaithful.

The documentary makes a strong case for Stevens’ talent — particularly her formidable comic chops, as illustrated in numerous clips of her work, including from an episode of Bonanza for which she won acclaim. She held her own opposite Jerry Lewis in The Nutty Professor and sparkled in the old-fashioned comedy How to Save a Marriage and Ruin Your Life opposite Dean Martin, with whom she had previously appeared in the Matt Helm spy spoof The Silencers. She received critical acclaim for her exuberant turn in Sam Peckinpah’s 1970 The Ballad of Cable Hogue, though the film was a flop. When she did appear in hits, such as the hugely popular disaster pic The Poseidon Adventure, it didn’t give her career much traction.  

She later became an iconic figure for Black audiences, thanks to her groundbreaking interracial love scene with Jim Brown in the blaxploitation hit Slaughter and her campy villainous turn in Cleopatra Jones and the Casino of Gold. But what she really wanted to do, as they say, was direct. She finally got her chance in 1989 with an indie feature called The Ranch, starring her son Andrew (he later returned the favor, directing her in the 1991 B-movie The Terror Within II), and a feminist-themed documentary, The American Heroine, which was never released.

Advertisement

Besides the ample clips from her roles and television appearances, the documentary includes fascinating home movies, personal photographs, and insightful commentary from various figures including film historians Leonard Maltin and Courtney Joyner. But it’s Tarantino who unsurprisingly proves the highlight, articulately gushing about Stevens’ performances with the passion of a true fan. (Introducing The Last Starlet at the festival, Andrew admitted that he basically handed the ball to Tarantino and let him run with it.)

While Stevens’ big-screen career eventually fizzled, she never stopped working, appearing in dozens of direct-to-video movies and TV series until her final appearance in something called Megaconda in 2010. “If the idea of being an actress is to work, she worked. She worked a lot,” Tarantino points out.

Her final days were sad ones, as she slowly succumbed to Alzheimer’s disease until her death at 84 in 2023. Much to the consternation of her son and her many fans, she was not included in the Academy Awards’ annual “In Memoriam” segment and never received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. The latter is a rebuff that should be corrected — especially if Stella Stevens: The Last Starlet gets the exposure it deserves.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending