Movie Reviews
‘In the Summers’ Review: A Quiet Debut Poetically Explores Forgiveness Between Parent and Child
In the relationship between parents and children, memories can be ravaged battlefields. The validity of certain experiences is tested and accusations of wrongdoing are negotiated. It’s within this charged arena that Alessandra Lacorazza sets her quiet debut film, In the Summers. The feature is a visual poem, an enveloping four-stanza ode to experiences shared by a man and his daughters.
It starts in the summer when Violeta (Dreya Renae Castillo) and Eva (Luciana Quinonez) visit their father, Vincente (René Pérez Joglar) in Las Cruces, New Mexico. Their first encounter, in the parking lot of the tiny town airport, is thick with the stilted awkwardness of distance. Lacorazza, who also wrote the screenplay, avoids specifying why Vincente hasn’t seen his kids, but some information can be gleaned from their bilingual conversations. We know it’s been a minute — so long that Vincente can’t remember what year of school his kids have just finished, among other milestones.
In the Summers
The Bottom Line An enveloping ode to fractious parent-child relationships.
Venue: Sundance Film Festival (U.S. Dramatic Competition)
Cast: René Pérez Joglar, Sasha Calle, Lío Mehiel, Leslie Grace, Emma Ramos, Sharlene Cruz
Director-screenwriter: Alessandra Lacorazza
1 hour 38 minutes
But the children are forgiving, as children tend to be when they are young. As Vincente drives Violeta and Eva around New Mexico, he regales them with stories of his own youth. He’s inherited a house from his mother, a gorgeous Spanish Adobe-style home with a pool in the backyard. Inside are the ephemera of generations: worn photos preserved in inherited frames, furniture so old it has its own secrets, and various containers, each with a story. Lacorazza and DP Alejandro Mejía tour the home. The details are important because later they will serve as evidence.
Of what, exactly, Lacorazza takes her time to reveal. In the Summer moves at the speed of a July afternoon or an August morning — an unhurried and languorous pace. Like last year’s Sundance stunner All Dirt Roads Taste of Salt, In the Summer sways to its own rhythm. The story unfolds slowly and depends on the impressive cast assembled. It’s the subtleties of their performances — nervous exchanges, slight moments when a body recoils — that clue us in to the latent danger of this vacation.
Vincente is a smart man who struggles to be a good father. He is an addict. His temper gets the best of him, and his thirst for thrill lands him in dangerous situations. Vincente wants to be better and, because of Joglar’s protective performance, you want that for him too. He buys the girls gifts, takes them stargazing and teaches them to play pool at his best friend Carmen’s bar. Played by Emma Ramos, Carmen becomes an immediate role model for Violeta, who can’t stop staring at her tapered cut. The next summer, when Violeta returns to New Mexico, she wears her own hair short.
Lacorazza introduces each section of the film with a long take of ritual altars, filled with objects we’ll come to recognize. When Vincente challenges his daughters to a no-utensils pasta eating contest, we remember the mass of red sauce and noodles from the first chapter opener.
The differences between Violeta and Eva become more apparent each summer, and there’s a charm to seeing the shot of the siblings waiting at the airport replicated every couple of years. Unlike Eva, Violeta doesn’t crave Vincente’s attention. She doesn’t even expect it. In this second summer, she’s preoccupied by Camila (Gabriella Elizabeth Surodjawan), the girl her father tutors for extra money. Violeta wonders if the curly haired New Mexico native has a boyfriend or if she has a real chance. Meanwhile, Eva pines for Vincente’s attention, which seems to be reserved for Violeta. At one point, he snarlingly demands why Eva can’t be smart like her sister.
Allison Salinas, who plays teenage Eva, captivates. After a traumatic incident during the second summer, her character comes to New Mexico alone for summer number three. These are a painful couple of months for Eva, who experiences the full heartbreak of unmet expectations from parents. Salinas communicates that pain with her eyes, which slightly tear up whenever Vincente directs his cruelty toward her.
By now we understand that Vincente is an alcoholic, frustrated by his inability to find work and anxious about proving himself. Eva also understands this, and spends most of her third summer wandering Las Crucas alone or helping her father’s new wife (Leslie Grace) care for their newborn. Against these disappointments, the house, so full of promise that first summer, falls into disrepair. With each reunion between father and children, Lacorazza gently guides our attention to the pool, clogged with leaves and dirt, the cluttered porch or the beer bottles accumulating on each surface.
In the Summers closes with a fourth chapter that, despite its stirring moments and brisker pacing, feels less assured than the previous three. Violeta (Mutt star Lio Mehiel) and Eva (Sasha Calle) are adults when they return to New Mexico. Violeta has transitioned, and will be starting graduate school in the fall. Eva’s fate is more obscure, but from the sunglasses she refuses to take off, you can sense the pain of that lonely summer hasn’t left her. Vincente is also different; his changes are marked by no alcohol in the house, a revived pool and an endearing shyness around his kids.
As Vincente tries to atone through insistent invitations, Violeta and Eva maintain firm boundaries with their father. They rent a place instead of staying at his house and a strained politeness blights their interactions with him. The presence of Vincente’s other child, Natalia (Indigo Montez), reveals the chasm between who Vincente was and who he is now. Some plotlines in this section — like the one between adult Violeta and Camila (now played by Sharlene Cruz) — are dogged by a lack of resolution.
But when Lacorazza focuses on the relationship between Violeta, Eva and Vincente, In the Summers feels steadier. In this space, Lacorazza considers the realities of forgiveness and wonders if healing is more about moving forward than it is about letting go.
Full credits
Venue: Sundance Film Festival (U.S. Narrative Competition)
Production companies: Lexicon, Bluestone Entertainment, Exile Content Studio, Assembly Line Entertainment, 1868 Studios, Arci Films, Cinema Maquina, Luz Films
Cast: René Pérez Joglar, Sasha Calle, Lío Mehiel, Leslie Grace, Emma Ramos, Sharlene Cruz
Director-screenwriter: Alessandra Lacorazza
Producers: Alexander Dinelaris, Rob Quadrino, Fernando Rodriguez-Vila, Jan Suter, Daniel Tantalean, Janek Ambros, Lynette Coll, Sergio Alberto Lira, Cristóbal Güell, Cynthia Fernandez De La Cruz, Slava Vladimirov, Stephanie Yankwitt
Executive producers: Isaac Lee, Henry R. Muñoz III, Jules Buenabenta, Richard Saperstein, Brooke Saperstein, Erick Douat, Arturo Sampson, Alexandra Mishaan, Bradley Feig, Justin Brown
Director of photography: Alejandro Mejía, A.M.C.
Production designer: Estefania Larrain De La Cerda
Costume designer: Fernando A. Rodriguez
Editor: Adam Dicterow
Music: Eduardo Cabra
Casting director: Stephanie Yankwitt, C.S.A.
Sales: CAA, XYZ
In English, Spanish
1 hour 38 minutes
Movie Reviews
Jeremy Schuetze’s ‘ANACORETA’ (2022) – Movie Review – PopHorror
PopHorror had the chance to check out Anacoreta (2022) ahead of its streaming release! Does this meta-horror flick provide interesting story telling or is it a confusing mess.
Let’s have a look…
Synopsis
A group of friends heads to a secluded woodland cabin for a weekend getaway, planning to film an experimental horror movie. As the shoot progresses, the project begins to fall apart—until a real and terrifying presence emerges from the darkness.
Anacoreta is directed by Jeremy Schuetze. It was written by Jeremy Schuetze and Matt Visser. The film stars Antonia Thomas (Bagman 2024), Jesse Stanley (Raf 2019), Jeremy Schuetze (Jennifer’s Body 2009), and Matt Visser (A Lot Like Christmas 2021)
My Thoughts
Antonia Thomas delivered an outstanding performance as the female lead in Anacoreta. It was remarkable to watch her convey such a wide range of emotions with authenticity and depth. I was continually impressed by her ability to switch seamlessly between different dialects. I absolutely loved her delivery of the dialogue of telling The Scorpion and the Frog fable.
Anacoreta employs a distinctive, meta-horror style of storytelling. The narrative follows a group of friends creating a “scripted reality” horror film, and as the plot unfolds, the boundary between their staged production and their actual lives becomes increasingly blurred. This was interesting, but at the same time frustrating as a viewer.

Check out Anacoreta on Prime Video and let us know your thoughts!
Movie Reviews
‘Hoppers’ review: Pixar’s best original movie in years
“So it’s like Avatar?” one character quips in Disney and Pixar’s “Hoppers,” bluntly translating the film’s high-concept premise for the sugar-fueled kids in the audience. And yes, the comparison is apt. The story follows a nature-obsessed teenage girl who manages to quite literally “hop” her consciousness into the body of a robotic beaver in order to spark an animal rebellion against a greedy mayor determined to bulldoze their forest for a freeway.
It’s a clever hook. The kind of big, elastic idea Pixar used to make look effortless. “Hoppers” does not reach the rarified air of “Up,” “Wall-E,” or “Inside Out,” but after a stretch of uneven originals like “Turning Red” and “Luca,” and outright misfires such as “Elemental” and “Elio,” this feels like a genuine course correction. The environmental messaging is clear without being preachy, the animals are irresistibly anthropomorphized, and the studio’s once-signature emotional sincerity is back in sturdy form.
Pixar can afford to gamble on originals when it has a guaranteed cash cow like this summer’s “Toy Story 5” waiting in the wings, but “Hoppers” earns its place in the catalogue. Director Daniel Chong crafts a warm, heartfelt film that occasionally strains under the weight of its own ambition, yet remains grounded by character and theme. Its meditation on conservation and animal displacement feels timely in a way that never tips into after-school-special territory.
We meet Mabel, voiced with bright conviction by Piper Curda, as a child liberating her classroom pets and returning them to the wild. Her moral compass is shaped by her grandmother, voiced by Karen Huie, who imparts wisdom about nature’s sanctity. True to both Pixar tradition and the broader Disney playbook, this beacon of guidance does not survive past the opening act. Loss, after all, is Pixar’s favorite inciting incident.
Years later, Mabel is still fighting the good fight, squaring off against the smarmy Mayor Jerry, voiced with slick menace by Jon Hamm. He plans to flatten the glade where Mabel and her grandmother once found solace. Mabel’s resistance feels noble but futile. The animals have already mysteriously vanished, the machinery is coming, and her last-ditch plan involves luring a beaver back to the abandoned forest in hopes of jumpstarting the ecosystem.
That’s when the film gleefully pivots into mad-scientist territory. At Beaverton University, Mabel discovers her professor, voiced by Kathy Najimy, has developed a device that can project human consciousness into synthetic animals. The process, dubbed “hopping,” allows Mabel to inhabit a robotic beaver and infiltrate the forest from within. It’s an inspired escalation that keeps the film buoyant even when the plotting grows predictable.
Her new posse includes King George, a lovably beaver voiced by Bobby Moynihan with distinct Bing Bong energy; a sharp-tongued bear voiced by Melissa Villaseñor; a regal bird king voiced by the late Isiah Whitlock Jr.; and a fish queen voiced by Ego Nwodim. As is often the case with Pixar, even in its lesser efforts, the world-building is meticulous. The animal hierarchy, complete with titles like “paw of the king,” is layered with jokes that play for kids while slyly winking at adults.
The plot ultimately follows a familiar template. Scrappy underdog rallies community. Corporate villain twirls metaphorical mustache. Emotional third-act sacrifice looms. At times, you can feel the machinery working a little too cleanly. Pixar, and Disney at large, has grown increasingly reliant on sequels and established IP, and “Hoppers” does not radically reinvent the wheel. In an animated landscape where films like “K-Pop: Demon Hunters,” “Across the Spider-Verse,” and “Goat” are pushing stylistic and narrative boundaries, being safe and sturdy may not always be enough.
And yet, there is something refreshing about a Pixar original that remembers how to tug at the heart without squeezing it dry. “Hoppers” is playful, peppered with cheeky needle drops, and builds to a sweet emotional catharsis that may or may not have left this critic a little misty-eyed. It feels earnest and engaged.
“Hoppers” may not be top-tier Pixar. But it is a welcome return to form, a reminder that the studio still knows how to marry big ideas with a bigger heart.
HOPPERS opens in theaters Friday, March 6th.
Movie Reviews
‘Hoppers’ review: Who can argue with hilarious talking animals?
Just when you think Pixar’s petting-zoo cute new movie “Hoppers” is flagrantly ripping off James Cameron, the characters come clean.
movie review
HOPPERS
Running time: 105 minutes. Rated PG (action/peril, some scary images and mild language). In theaters March 6.
“You guys, this is like ‘Avatar’!,” squeals 19-year-old Mabel (Piper Curda), the studio’s rare college-age heroine.
Shoots back her nutty professor, Dr. Fairfax (Kathy Kajimy): “This is nothing like ‘Avatar!’”
Sorry, Doc, it definitely is. And that’s fine. Placing the smart sci-fi story atop an animated family film feels right for Pixar, which has long fused the technological, the fantastical and the natural into a warm signature blend. Also, come on, “Avatar” is “Dances With Wolves” via “E.T.”
What separates “Hoppers” from the pack of recent Pix flix, which have been wholesome as a church bake sale, is its comic irreverence.
Director Daniel Chong’s original movie is terribly funny, and often in an unfamiliar, warped way for the cerebral and mushy studio. For example, I’ve never witnessed so many speaking characters be killed off in a Pixar movie — and laughed heartily at their offings to boot.
What’s the parallel to Pandora? Mabel, a budding environmental activist, has stumbled on a secret laboratory where her kooky teachers can beam their minds into realistic robot animals in order to study them. They call the devices “hoppers.”
Bold and fiery Mabel — PETA, but palatable — sees an opportunity.
The mayor of Beaverton, Jerry (Jon Hamm), plans to destroy her beloved local pond that’s teeming with wildlife to build an expressway. And the only thing stopping the egomaniacal pol — a more upbeat version of President Business from “The Lego Movie” — is the water’s critters, who have all mysteriously disappeared.
So, Mabel avatars into beaver-bot, and sets off in search of the lost creatures to discover why they’ve left.
From there, the movie written by Jesse Andrews (“Luca”) toys with “Toy Story.” Here’s what mischief fuzzy mammals, birds, reptiles and insects get up to when humans aren’t snooping around. Dance aerobics, it turns out.
Per the usual, “Hoppers” goes deep inside their intricate society. The beasts have a formal political system of antagonistic “Game of Thrones”-like royal houses. The most menacing are the Insect Queen (Meryl Streep — I’d call her a chameleon, but she’s playing a bug), a staunch monarch butterfly and her conniving caterpillar kid (Dave Franco). They’re scheming for power.
Perfectly content with his station is Mabel’s new best furry friend King George (Bobby Moynihan), a gullible beaver who ascended to the throne unexpectedly. He happily enforces “pond rules,” such as, “When you gotta eat, eat.”
That means predators have free rein to nosh on prey, and everybody’s cool with it. Because of bone-dry deliveries, like exhausted office drones, the four-legged cast members are hilarious as they go about their Animal Planet activities.
No surprise — talking lizards, sharks, bears, geese and frogs are the real stars here. They far outshine Mabel, even when she dons beaver attire. Much like a 19-year-old in a job interview, she doesn’t leave much of an impression.
Yes, the teen has a heartfelt motivation: The embattled pond was her late grandma’s favorite place. Mabel promised her that she’d protect it.
But in personality she doesn’t rank as one of Pixar’s most engaging leads, perhaps because she’s past voting age. Mabel is nestled in a nebulous phase between teenage rebellion and adulthood that’s pretty blasé, even if a touch of tension comes from her hiding her Homo sapien identity from her new diminutive pals. When animated, kids make better adventurers, plain and simple.
“Hoppers” continues Pixar’s run of humble, charming originals (“Luca,” “Elio”) in between billion-dollar-grossing, idea-starved sequels (“Inside Out 2,” probably “Toy Story 5”). The Disney-owned studio’s days of irrepressible innovation and unmatched imagination are well behind it. No one’s awed by anything anymore. “Coco,” almost 10 years ago, was their last new property to wow on the scale of peak Pixar.
Look, the new movie is likable and has a brain, heart and ample laughs. That’s more than I can say for most family fare. “A Minecraft Movie” made me wanna hop right out of the theater.
-
World6 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts7 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO7 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Oregon5 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Florida3 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Maryland3 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Culture1 week agoTry This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies