Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Doin’ It’ Review: Lilly Singh’s High-School Sex-Ed Comedy Gets an Incomplete

Published

on

‘Doin’ It’ Review: Lilly Singh’s High-School Sex-Ed Comedy Gets an Incomplete

Doin’ It revolves around surely the most literal interpretation imaginable of the old saying “those who can, do; those who can’t, teach.” Lilly Singh stars as Maya, who stumbles almost by accident into a job teaching sex ed, despite still being a virgin. As she schools her kids on everything from consent to gender identity to orgasms, Maya sets out to unlearn the shame that she herself internalized at that age — and maybe even to get laid for the first time.

Good intentions practically drip off the premise, which makes a convincing case for dismantling the fear and ignorance around adolescent sex ed. And Doin’ It puts its money where its mouth is — its jokes eschew pearl-clutching or coyness in favor of in-your-face crassness. But the comedy never quite settles into a comfortable rhythm, and eventually backs itself into a corner so far away from any recognizable reality that it threatens to undermine the very message it wants to send.

Doin’ It

The Bottom Line

Good intentions, uneven execution.

Advertisement

Venue: SXSW Film Festival (Narrative Spotlight)
Cast: Lilly Singh, Ana Gasteyer, Sabrina Jalees, Trevor Salter, Sonia Dhillon Tully, Stephanie Beatriz, Mary Holland, Utkarsh Ambudkar
Director: Sarah Zandieh
Screenwriters: Lilly Singh, Sara Zandieh, Neel Patel

1 hour 30 minutes

Doin’ It‘s NSFW sensibility is front and center from the very first scene, in which a 15-year-old Maya has semen squirted in her face twice in five minutes by a friend who cannot control his excitement at getting to see her boobs. Her curiosity turns to humiliation, however, when a mishap involving a stage curtain reveals the moment to an entire auditorium of students and parents. Horrified, Maya’s mother (Sonia Dhillon Tully’s Veena) sends her packing to India, where her urges are further disciplined out of her: When she’s caught playing MASH in class, she’s made to stand outside in the heat “until all your dirty thoughts melt away.” By the time Maya returns to the States as a 30something software engineer shilling for a teen-oriented app, she’s hardly more experienced than she was as a teen. But in an effort to research her target demo, she picks up the teaching job and simultaneously tries to catch up on all the adolescent experiences she missed way back then.

Doin’ It is at its brightest in Maya’s personal journey of self-liberation, which yields one comically mortifying situation after another. While the actual gags are hit or miss (running bits frequently overstay their welcome, and too many jokes are built on formats so hoary we can see the punchline coming from three miles away), the frankness with which they’re presented is refreshing: Maya may blush at seeing her first vibrator, but her movie has no qualms about showing us that same vibrator messy with recent use. Its playful attitude toward sex is most fully embodied by Sabrina Jalees as Maya’s BFF Jess, a scene-stealer whether she’s fingerbanging papayas at the grocery store or crowing about how her DJ girlfriend “remixes my pussy like fucking Tiësto.”

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the film extends sincere empathy toward Maya’s struggle to internalize in private the sex-positive values she espouses in public. “I’m confident with everything else but when it comes to this stuff, it’s like I’m broken,” she cries after a date with a cute fellow teacher (Trevor Salter) ends with her cruelly projecting her own fears about being “weak” and “prudish” onto him.

Her arc is neatly complemented by her mother’s. When Veena insists she couldn’t possibly date because she’s not that kind of woman — even while she laps up storylines about middle-aged romance on Never Have I Ever — we see how repression gets handed down the generations. In that light, Maya’s determination to break the cycle with her own students feels all the more noble.

The problem is that Doin’ It‘s idea of Maya’s work is so underbaked, it’s practically raw. “Maybe I have an opportunity here,” she muses when Jess mentions that half the schools in the state don’t even have sex ed, and that’s all it takes for Maya to decide to throw out the abstinence-only curriculum mandated by the district. On her first day, she’s so green she doesn’t know the difference between an IUD and a UTI. Seemingly overnight, she’s playing Betty Dodson videos and breaking down the best woman-on-top sex positions without so much as batting an eye. In doing so, she’s framed as an inspirational teacher in the Dead Poets Society mold, meeting her students at their own level in defiance of the oppressive standards that define the world around them. But the script, by Singh, director Sara Zandieh and Neel Patel, is never very clear about the challenges or the stakes she faces.

The opposition to her teachings is strangely toothless — none of the other parents or teachers even notice how drastically she’s strayed from the lesson plan for weeks, and once they do, the ensuing pushback plays out with more confusion than venom. It’s outside the scope of any one movie, let alone a lighthearted comedy like this one, to fix the state of sex ed in America. But as high-school students in the real world deal with book bans, limited contraception access and parental notification bills, Doin’ It‘s reluctance to touch on those weightier topics has the effect of minimizing the problem. In this fantasy, all you need to transform an entire generation’s relationship with sex is for a single teacher to decide that she wants to do it.

“We need a sexual revolution, and it starts in this place, today,” Maya declares in a dramatic speech, and she’s not wrong — her own storyline in Doin’ It serves as a warning of how the damage wrought by shame can take years or decades or entire lifetimes to move past. But if today’s youth indeed deserve honesty, the film might start by being a bit more candid about what the sex-positivity movement is really up against.

Advertisement

Full credits

Venue: SXSW Film Festival (Narrative Spotlight)
Production companies: Likely Story, Unicorn Island Productions, Camelback Productions
Cast: Lilly Singh, Ana Gasteyer, Sabrina Jalees, Trevor Salter, Sonia Dhillon Tully, Stephanie Beatriz, Mary Holland, Utkarsh Ambudkar
Director: Sara Zandieh
Screenwriters: Lilly Singh, Sara Zandieh, Neel Patel
Producers: Anthony Bregman, Erica Matlin, Polly Auritt, Lilly Singh, Anita Verma-Lallian
Executive producers: Sara Zandieh, Neel Patel, Jawad Ahsan
Cinematographer: Jason Oldak
Production designer: Peter Cosco
Costume designer: Georgia Yarhi
Editor: Jon Philpot
Composer: Tom Westin, Zachary Greer
Casting directors: Jeanne McCarthy, Nicole Abellera Hallman, John Buchan, Jason Knight
Sales: WME

1 hour 30 minutes

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Ella McCay

Published

on

Ella McCay

Other Noteworthy Elements

Ryan and Ella’s marriage appears to be on the rocks. Ella wonders if Ryan only married her for the perks of her career (even when they were young, it was clear Ella had a big future in store). And Ryan’s foul behavior suggests this is true.

When Ella forgets to thank Ryan for his support during a speech (because she gets flustered by unexpected interruptions from Governor Bill), Ryan essentially throws a temper tantrum. He uses the incident to try to convince Ella to get him a political position (egged on by his mother, who belittles her own husband). He then resorts to unscrupulous means to manipulate and embarrass Ella, holding the threat of divorce over her head.

We’re told that other politicians despise Ella. Her very presence reminds them of their own inadequacies as policymakers and compromises they’ve made as politicians. (At one point, Ella criticizes the majority of her fellow politicians for spending more time campaigning than they do reading proposed legislation.) Even Bill, when Ella asks him for advice, is hesitant to openly support Ella, since it could hurt his own career. As such, the film seems to serve as a commentary on the political state at large: Ella literally says, “You can’t be popular and fix anything.”

Not long after Eddie’s affairs come out, Helen hugs him and tells him she loves him but that she’ll never forgive him for cheating on his wife. Years later, Eddie seemingly tries to make amends with his children, but it’s fueled by a selfish desire, since his current girlfriend told him she wouldn’t marry him unless he made up with his kids. And when Helen tells Eddie that he needs to stop messing up long enough for his kids to forgive him and do the work required to fix his relationships, he retorts that his kids will “be better” once they forgive him.

We learn that Ella’s mom passed away young, though we’re not given the details of what caused her death. Eddie admits that he sent Casey to military school after her death because he “didn’t want the responsibility” and that he avoided Ella because he was scared of how she’d react to that decision. (At the film’s start, he and Ella haven’t spoken in 13 years.)

Advertisement

A politician uses a cheat sheet of sorts while calling donors to make it seem like he cares about them. People lie, scheme and manipulate others. We hear about political blackmail and bribery. Casey’s job involves advising people on sports betting. A trooper assigned to Ella’s protection unit purposely goes into overtime in spite of a budget crisis because he’s tight on cash and apparently going through an expensive divorce.

Casey is described as agoraphobic because he hasn’t left his house in 13 months. However, he insists that his reclusiveness is a choice—that he can leave whenever he wants. But he does seem to have some severe anxiety about leaving, and we learn that his self-imposed solitary confinement followed an embarrassing romantic mishap. His house is littered with dirty dishes and bags of trash.

A woman gets petty revenge against someone by calling the health department on his pizzeria and getting it shut down.

[Spoiler warning] Ryan, in a strange grab for attention, starts a political scandal for Ella involving blackmail and bribery. He gives Ella an ultimatum, and Ella responds that if he loved her—if he even liked her—he wouldn’t be doing this to her. Because Ryan doesn’t get what he wants, he blames the blackmail and bribery on Ella, telling the press that he’s divorcing her. And the scandal, though completely fabricated, is bad enough for her party to remove her from office.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: In Scarlet, transplanting Hamlet to an anime dreamworld | Mint

Published

on

Movie Review: In Scarlet, transplanting Hamlet to an anime dreamworld | Mint

The Japanese writer-director Mamoru Hosoda has made some amazing films that take profound leaps into dreamlike worlds.

Hosoda’s “Mirai” (2018) is about a 4-year-old boy who’s resentful of his newborn sister. But in his backyard garden, he meets his sister as a teenager. This is just the first of many domestic time travels, as the boy meets other relatives from other points in their lives. A new understanding begins to dawn.

In “Belle” (2022), a teenager who’s lived through tragedy finds a soaring catharsis in a virtual realm. I thought it was one of the best films of that year, and I still think it might be the best movie ever made about the internet. Either way, its song-and-soul-shattering climax is unforgettable.

Yet in Hosoda’s latest, “Scarlet,” the director’s enviable reach exceeds his grasp. In it, his female protagonist is a medieval princess who, after seeing her king father killed by her uncle, and dying herself, awakes in an expansive purgatory. In this strange afterlife, peopled by the dead from all time periods, she seeks revenge for her father.

Anyone, I think, would grant that a Japanese anime that transplants “Hamlet” to a surreal netherworld is a touch more ambitious than your average animated movie. Unlike the wide majority of cartoons, or even live-action movies, the problem with “Scarlet” isn’t a lack of imagination. It’s too much.

Advertisement

Hosoda, a former Studio Ghibli animator whose other films include “Wolf Children” and “Summer Wars,” has an extraordinary knack for crafting anime worlds of visual complexity while pursuing existential ideas with a childlike sincerity. But an excess of baroque design, of emotion, of scope, sinks Hosoda’s “Scarlet.” It’s the kind of misfire you can forgive. If you’re going to fail by overreach, it might as well be with a wildly ambitious rendering of “Hamlet.”

In the thrilling prologue, set in 16th century Denmark, Scarlet (Ashida Mana) watches as her uncle Claudius (Kôji Yakusho) frames her father as a traitor and has him executed. Enraged, Scarlet — without any visitation from her father’s ghost — goes to kill Claudius. Only he poisons her first, and Scarlet awakes in what she learns is called the Otherlands.

It’s a kind of infinite wasteland, full of wandering souls and marauding bandits. People are there for a time, and then they pass into nothingness. A stairway to heaven is rumored to exist somewhere. As she seeks Claudius, Scarlet is joined by a stranger she encounters named Hijiri (Okada Masaki). A paramedic from modern day, he spends most of his time in the Otherworld trying to heal the wounds of others, including Scarlet’s foes.

“Scarlet” can be meandering and tedious. Even Rosencrantz and Guildenstern turn up. If the Otherworld is laid out like Scarlet’s troubled conscience, the ensuing battle between vengeance and forgiveness feels dully simplified. It’s all a sea of troubles. Hosoda tries to build some interiority to the story (not a small aspect of “Hamlet”) through Hijiri’s backstory, telescoping Shakespeare’s quandaries to contemporary times.

Hosoda grafted “Beauty and the Beast” into “Belle,” to sometimes awkward, sometimes illuminating effect. But in “Scarlet,” he struggles to bridge “Hamlet” to today. It’s a big swing, the kind filmmakers as talented as Hosoda should be taking, but it doesn’t pay off. Still, it’s often dazzling to look at it and it’s never not impassioned. Hosoda remains a director capable of reaching trembling, operatic heights. In “Scarlet,” for instance, Claudius gets a spectacular death scene, a remarkable accomplishment considering he’s already dead.

Advertisement

“Scarlet,” a Sony Pictures Classics release, opens in limited release Friday and in wider theatrical release Feb. 6. Rated PG-13 by the Motion Picture Association for violence/bloody image. Playing in both Japanese with subtitles and English dubbed versions. Running time: 112 minutes. Two stars out of four.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘No Other Choice’ Review: Park Chan-wook’s Timely, Dark, Hilarious Comedic Satire That Slays with Style

Published

on

‘No Other Choice’ Review: Park Chan-wook’s Timely, Dark, Hilarious Comedic Satire That Slays with Style

Most people who have seen a few director Park movies will agree that he has one of the most creative and crazy minds out there. I’m happy to join the choir. This marks the 55-year-old filmmaker’s inaugural foray into the Black comedy subgenre, although we are cognizant of his cheekiness. 

Director Park’s examination of the economic class structures in South Korea, as evidenced by Man-soo’s dismissal, is as bleak as it is in any other urbanized capitalist nation. It is, after all, based on an American novel, but it exploits this premise to build a powerful Black comedy. With No Other Choice‘s straightforward plot, he deconstructs the conventions of masculinity under a capitalistic umbrella through a kooky but always funny atmosphere. One equally funny and depressing recurring gag is post-firing affirmations that many of the unemployed former breadwinners use as an excuse to continue their self-pity wallowing. Man-soo’s dubious scheme reflects himself in his fellow compatriots, who share the same ill fate. They all neglect their loving families, becoming real-time losers to the significant impact of the capitalist culture on the common man. As the plot develops, Park explores the twisted but captivating development of this man regaining his sense of self and spine… You know, through murder. 

As this social satire unfolds in dark, humorous ways, No Other Choice is a rare example of style and substance working together. Director Park throws every stylistic option he can at the wall, and almost everything sticks. Mainly because his imaginative lens – crossfades, dissolves, and memorable feats – is both visually captivating and enriching to Man-soo’s mission. The film encroaches on noir-thriller sensibilities, especially with its modern setting. Man-soo’s choices become more engrossing and inventive, proving timely even in its most familiar beats while personalizing every supporting character. 

Director Park and his reunion with director of photography Kim Woo-hyung from The Little Drummer Girl execute a distinctive vision that flawlessly captures the screwball comedy archetype with its own rhythmic precision and stunning visuals, particularly in contrast to the picturesque autumnal backdrop. Compared to Decision to Leave, it’s more maximalist, but it still makes you think, “Wow, this is how movies should look.” Nevertheless, the meticulous framework and blocking in the numerous chaotic sequences impart a unique dark-comedic tone that evokes a classic comedy from the height of silent era cinema, albeit in stunning Technicolor. 

In an exceptional leading performance, Lee Byung-hun channels his inner Chaplin.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending