Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Deadpool & Wolverine Movie Review: Ryan Reynolds brings the house down in this bloody spectacle

Published

on

Deadpool & Wolverine Movie Review: Ryan Reynolds brings the house down in this bloody spectacle
Story: Deadpool, aka Wade Wilson (Ryan Reynolds), pulls Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) back from the dead to save his own world from a powerful and diabolical enemy. But before they can save the world, will they end up killing each other?

Review: Deadpool has always been known for his wisecracks and witty comebacks, but this time, Ryan Reynolds (also a co-writer) takes it up several notches, making this Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) tentpole a riotous affair. His comedic punches are even more impactful than the physical ones, both of which land with an impact.

Director Shawn Levy, hailed by many as the saviour of the MCU’s troubled fortunes, delivers a self-aware, self-deprecating gag fest from the very first scene. This franchise outing spares no one, poking fun at everything – from Disney’s takeover of Fox to Hugh Jackman’s seemingly eternal association with the franchise as Wolverine. Even Captain America and Mad Max aren’t safe from Deadpool’s relentless jabs. It’s a no-holds-barred chaotic comedy that pulls out all the stops, and we are definitely not complaining.

The plot is straightforward yet engaging: one insanely powerful enemy against two superheroes, one of whom is desperate to become an Avenger. Deadpool’s world, consisting of the nine people he truly cares about, is in danger, and to save it, he ropes in a variant of the late James ‘Logan’ Howlett or the Wolverine. Logan, now stuck with Deadpool’s incessant chatter, finds himself in the Void, facing the formidable villain Cassandra Nova (Emma-Louise Corrin) alongside a slew of other superheroes, leading to bloody battles and relentless action.

Ryan Reynolds is the heartbeat of this movie. We expect Deadpool to be unfiltered and offensive, but Reynolds elevates it to another level. His relentless banter fuels the madness of this installment, making it clear that Deadpool is an equal-opportunity offender. Reynolds’ unhinged portrayal of Deadpool is a testament to the franchise’s desperate need for a course correction. The film shatters the fourth wall and even takes on the fans, with Deadpool addressing them as nerds and making cheeky comments about their “special sock” for the most anticipated fight scenes. This back-to-basics approach reminds us that at its core, this franchise is based on a comic book after all and should never have been more complicated.

Advertisement

Hugh Jackman plays it cool as Wolverine, but his character shows signs of weariness, which Deadpool humorously addresses by suggesting the MCU will keep Jackman in the role until he’s 90. Jackman takes the joke in his stride, and their on-screen chemistry flows organically. The mindless banter, sexual innuendos, and tension amid the bromance are complemented by intense action and bloodshed. There’s enough and more of it, but one wonders when to really feel worried about any of the characters because almost everyone is always immortal. Well almost. The film boasts spectacular visuals typical of a big-screen outing, and at just over two hours, it seldom feels like a drag. There are many noteworthy cameos, but we aren’t the ones to give spoilers of any kind. Emma Corrin stands out as the evil Cassandra Nova, her petite frame belying the raw power she wields.

Whether you’re a fan or not, ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ keeps you engaged with its constant stream of action and humor. It helps to be familiar with the legacy characters and storyline (as messy and complicated as it may be) to fully appreciate the experience, especially when watching it with an enthusiastic audience. ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ breaks barriers and goes where other MCU films haven’t, capturing nostalgia, humour, and most importantly, delivering oodles of entertainment. This is exactly what the franchise needs to stay relevant and enjoyable.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Kenda’ movie review: A sharp observation on the nexus between crime and politics

Published

on

‘Kenda’ movie review: A sharp observation on the nexus between crime and politics

Bharath B V in ‘Kenda’
| Photo Credit: Special Arrangement

In director Sahadev Kelvadi’s Kenda, the protagonist Keshava (B V Bharath) is playing cricket on the road with his neighbour, a school-going boy. He instructs the boy facing his deliveries to focus on the ball and not look at his hand. In the scene, the film’s aimless protagonist and a child with dreams find purpose in the game of cricket; this scene best describes the tone of the narrative. Kenda is intentionally minimalistic and consistently realistic, with scenes from the movie playing out exactly how you would see them happen in the real world.

From the makers of Gantumoote, the plotis set in a much simpler time. Back then, playing cricket matches on the roads passionately fuelled dreams of representing the country.

The film doesn’t reveal its timeline, but gives you enough clues to guess the period in which its story unfolds. A cricket match on TV shows Debasis Mohanty, the Indian pacer who caught attention for his open-chested action in the late 90s. A mobster in a dingy bar swoons over a poster of Urmila Matondkar in her heyday after Rangeela; it becomes evident that the film is set between the late 90s and early 2000s.

Kenda (Kannada)

Director: Sahadev Kelvadi

Cast: Bharath B V, Gopalkrishna Deshpande, Rekha Kudligi, Deepti Nagendra, Vinod Ravindran

Advertisement

Runtime: 135 minutes

Storyline: A young man’s journey through a web of crime and politics while he struggles to come to terms with his deep and dark desires

Keshava, who works in a factory, lives a mundane life until he gets caught up in the web of politics and crime due to Narasimha Shastry (Vinod Ravindran), a politically ambitious person who runs a small newspaper. Narasimha Shastry believes in “making news” and hires young men to stage protests and bandhs. His speeches have false promises, and he rattles off lines from the Bhagavad Gita, especially on death.

ALSO READ:Sahadev Kelvadi on turning director with ‘Kenda’

The film attempts to be a political satire, but Kenda’s triumph lies in its sharp observation of how the young walk onto the wrong path, without a point of return. Right from the starting point of hooliganism (being lured into the field) to showcasing the different aspects of the world, the story steadfastly proves how this nexus of crime and politics is carefully established by people in power using young men in need of financial support. 

Advertisement
A still from ‘Kenda’

A still from ‘Kenda’
| Photo Credit:
DBeatsMusicWorld/YouTube

For instance, it all begins with Keshava getting asked a simple question: How much does he make from his job in the factory? Money becomes a deciding factor for several youngsters, who are perhaps denied opportunities, to opt for jobs that put them on the list of miscreants.

The film also portrays the rise of electronic media. It feels like watching a different era as we see television journalists covering important issues (one being farmers’ protests), unlike now, where they run (literally) behind TRP-worthy news. However, the film shows the beginning of the downfall of TV reporting too when one of the news readers proudly claims “first on our channel” while displaying exclusive footage.

However, the film’s absurdist element makes Kenda less comprehensible towards the end. It’s as if the director wants to elevate the drama, but something holds him back from going for the final punch; his indulgence is evident in the philosophical portions involving a sex worker, as Kenda tends to get lost a bit with plenty of things in the mix.

Despite the complications, Kenda is more or less a solid outing which doesn’t resemble your typical heroic bloodshed film, as it doesn’t succumb to broad strokes. Simply put, it is about an innocent getting drawn to rowdyism, and the protagonist of Kenda looks and behaves like one of us. This practicality in writing is rare in Kannada cinema.

Kenda will hit the screens on July 26.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Frankie Freako’ Is a Fun Ode to ’90s Puppet Mayhem Movies [Fantasia Review]

Published

on

‘Frankie Freako’ Is a Fun Ode to ’90s Puppet Mayhem Movies [Fantasia Review]

Seeing isn’t always believing in The Chapel, the latest film from Piggy writer/director Carlota Pereda. Written by Pereda, as well as Albert Bertran Bas and Carmelo Viera, The Chapel is a supernatural drama about intergenerational trauma between mothers and their daughters.

The film opens in 1631 in a small Spanish town that is besieged by the Black Plague. Men in plague masks gather up sick individuals to lock them in the titular chapel to preserve the health of the community and, as the crowd watches, a young, infected Uxoa (Alba Hernández) is separated from her mother, who refuses to help.

The moment of familial discomfort is upended, however, when a member of the crowd raises a smartphone to shoot video of the event, shattering the authenticity of the moment. It turns out what we’re seeing is a historical reenactment: these are actors who are playing a part in an annual five day festival. Once a year the haunted church is opened up and the town becomes a debauchery-laden tourist destination.

A similar instance of visual questioning occurs only a few moments later when characters walk through town and arrive at a painted facade two-stories tall that mimics the real street behind it.

Because these moments are so close together – and occur so early in the film – it is clear that it’s a larger part of Pereda, Bas and Viera’s subtle agenda. The Chapel is clearly interested in exploring notions of life after death, spiritualism, and belief, but the screenwriters also seemingly want the audience to evaluate what we’re seeing and what constitutes truth.

Advertisement

The heroine of the film is young eight year old Emma (Maia Zaitegi), an aspiring medium who is bullied at school because it’s a well known fact that her mother (Loreto Mauleón) is dying of cancer. Although the woman is effectively in hospice, Emma can’t bear to be separated from her mother, so instead of being sent away to relatives or into foster care, Emma is regularly babysat by well-intentioned neighbors, Edurne (Elena Irureta) and Asier (Jon Olivares).

The kindly adults are no match for Emma’s strong will and her tendency to sneak out, however, so her de facto surrogate parent becomes police officer Jon Elorza (Josean Bengoetxea). He’s the one who typically finds Emma in the middle of the night, unaccompanied, and performing spells to try and speak with the spirit of Uxoa, who haunts the chapel.

The plot kicks in when Ivana Peralta (Nagore Aranburu), the old “witch” Emma was studying under, dies of natural causes on the eve of the festival. Concerned that if her mother dies during the five days, her spirit will be imprisoned inside the religious site, Emma befriends the witch’s daughter, Carol (Belén Rueda) who arrives in town to settle the estate and manage the funeral.

Rueda is eminently watchable as the scowling disbeliever with a tortured backstory. Carol makes a living as a fraudster mystic, she actively tells Emma she hates children, and she stalks through town in her mother’s fur coat like a fury. She also wears her history, quite literally, on her face: the entire left side is badly burned, a detail The Chapel mines for a narrative reveal in the last act.

Advertisement

The skeptical adult/precocious child partnership isn’t new, but it works exceptionally well here because both actors are great. Zaitegi is especially revelatory: the rare child actor who negotiates the fine line between cloying, annoying, and dangerously mature for their age. It’s the centerpiece performance of the film and it only works because Emma is inherently worth rooting for, even when she repeatedly sneaks out after dark, engages in risky spiritualist activities, and actively courts the attention of violent ghosts.

Alas the film loses its way roughly halfway through. While The Chapel makes a clear throughline between Uxoa, Carol, and Emma’s “abandonment” by their respective mothers, when it comes time to confront the literal ghosts of their past, there’s nothing else to explore. The climax is particularly muddled, as the aforementioned “question what you see” element comes roaring back in a poorly shot sequence featuring a fiery pyre. 

It’s even more disappointing considering the spectacle that Pereda creates only moments before: a mountain of mutilated plague bodies piled on top of each other. This is easily the most haunting visual in the entire film, but it stands out in stark contrast to earlier unconvincing CGI on the Plague Mask ghost that regularly attacks Emma.

Alas, it is the horror elements where The Chapel falls down. There’s more mood and tension in a scene when Carol stumbles drunk through the town in the middle of night than most of the overly familiar monster attack sequences. 

The film works best when it is investigating the nature of female relationships between Emma, her mother, and Carol or when it explores Emma’s inability to process her mother’s impending death (fans of J.A. Bayona’s A Monster Calls will find this to be a suitable companion piece). 

Advertisement

As a female-centric drama with genre-adjacent tones, this is a strong calling card for Pereda’s talent. As a horror film, though? The Chapel is muddled.

3 skulls out of 5

The Chapel made its North American debut at the Fantasia International Film Festival.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

DEADPOOL & WOLVERINE Review

Published

on

DEADPOOL & WOLVERINE Review
(PaPa, C, B, H, LLL, VVV, SS, N, A, DD, M):

Dominant Worldview and Other Worldview Content/Elements:

Strong pagan, slightly mixed, irreverent, often lawless worldview, but the movie’s premise has a solid redemptive, moral aspect to it where the main character wants to make a difference, save his friends, be a hero, and defeat two power-mad villains, and sacrifice ultimately solves the movie’s plot problem, and this is overtly referred to in the dialogue, plus the movie takes place in a humanist multiverse, though the movie appears to acknowledge the monotheistic idea that there are ultimate values that transcend the individual multiverses (thus, for example, Deadpool truly does want to be the kind of hero that his girlfriend wants him to be);

Foul Language:

At least 139 obscenities (including many “f” and “s” words), one possible Jesus profanity, seven GD profanities, and 13 light profanities;

Advertisement

Violence:

Lots of extreme and even bloody and well as strong violence includes Wolverine gets really mad at Deadpool two or three times, and they fight and try to kill each other even though the bodies of both men have regenerative power, lots of stabbing from Wolverine’s claws and Deadpool’s swords against each other and against bad guys, Deadpool decimates a bunch of Time Variance Authority soldiers with bones from a skeleton that have been infused with unbreakable adamantine steel, some explosions, a villain is able to infiltrate and control the minds of other people (this is depicted as if one of the villain’s hands is poking through the person’s head – there’s no blood, the action seems to be more metaphorical or taking place on a non-physical plane), explosions, gunfights, people are shot multiple times (for example, both Deadpool and another character shoot Wolverine multiple times in two plot twists), and-to-hand combat, villain with telekinetic powers kills one character by ripping his skin away, and people go flying during the movie’s many fight scenes;

Sex:

No sex scenes but the dialogue has a smattering of crude sex jokes, including a joke about a Boy Scout leader exposing himself;

Nudity:

Advertisement

Brief upper male nudity;

Alcohol Use:

Some alcohol use;

Smoking and/or Drug Use and Abuse:

No smoking, but an older side character enjoys cocaine, and there are jokes about her cocaine use, though it’s never depicted; and,

Advertisement

Miscellaneous Immorality:

Deadpool lies to Wolverine about an important matter, but Wolverine eventually forgives him and accepts Deadpool’s perspective on why his lie wasn’t really a lie.

In DEADPOOL & WOLVERINE, Deadpool wants to make a positive difference in the universe to regain the love of Vanessa and teams up with a reluctant Wolverine to stop a power-mad bureaucrat from the Time Variance Authority who’s trying to destroy Deadpool’s universe. DEADPOOL & WOLVERINE takes the crude language and extreme violence in the first two Deadpool movies to new depths of degradation, which ultimately overwhelms the movie’s redemptive heroic premise and dilutes the movie’s enjoyment level.

In the story, Wade Wilson aka wants to regain the love of his girlfriend, Vanessa, to become a true hero. However, The Avengers turn him down, so he stops using his Deadpool identity altogether and just enjoys being with his friends, including Vanessa. He still wants to get back with her though, but she nixes the idea.

Two years later or so, a power-mad bureaucrat from the Time Variance Authority (TVA), calling himself Mr. Paradox, picks up Wade. Paradox thinks Wade has matured enough to be a hero. He wants Wade’s help for a special assignment. Wade is gung ho and gets Paradox to build him a new Deadpool suit. However, he rebels against Paradox when he discovers that Paradox is trying to destroy Wade’s universe, including Vanessa and his friends. Apparently, the death of Logan, aka Wolverine of the X-Men, in Wade’s universe has set off a chain of events that will lead to the universe’s destruction sometime in the future anyway. So, Paradox decides why wait for all that pain and misery to develop? Why not just destroy Wade’s universe now?

Advertisement

A fight occurs Paradox’s offices. Wearing his Deadpool suit, Wade manages to escape in one of the TVA’s multiverse time travel portals. Deadpool travels back to Wolverine’s burial place to revive him. Things don’t go according to plan, and Deadpool finds a seemingly insurmountable obstacle. He eventually figures a way around it, but only to find another obstacle. Wolverine is not interested in stopping Mr. Paradox, and certainly not to work with Deadpool, whom he loathes.

Even when Wolverine finally reluctantly agrees to help, he and Deadpool encounter the biggest obstacle of all, a new, even more powerful villain. This villain wants to destroy the whole multiverse except for one area.

Can Deadpool and Wolverine stop this new villain and Mr. Paradox too? Can Deadpool save his own universe? Will Deadpool stop his incessant talking?

Except for some exposition, the jokes and action in DEADPOOL & WOLVERINE don’t stop. The movie also has some surprising, funny cameos. However, the movie takes the crude language and extreme violence in the first two Deadpool movies to new levels, or depths.

For example, Wolverine gets really mad at Deadpool at least twice. They fight and try to kill each other, with Wolverine stabbing Deadpool repeatedly with his claws, and Deadpool stabbing Wolverine repeatedly with his samurai swords. As fans of the two characters know, the bodies of both men have regenerative powers, so these scenes seem to go on forever with no resolution. In another long scene, Deadpool slices and dices multiple TVA policemen. Also, in a third long scene, Deadpool and Wolverine wade through a horde of assailants together. The brutality of the violence is clearly too extreme.

Advertisement

The number of obscenities in DEADPOOL & WOLVERINE has also sunk to new “heights,” going well over 100 to about 140 or more. There’s also some strong lewd dialogue, including a joke about a Boy Scout leader exposing himself. Unlike the first DEADPOOL movie, however, this third movie has no explicit sex scenes or nudity.

Ultimately, the brutality of the violence and the amount of obscene language in DEADPOOL & WOLVERINE dilutes the enjoyment of the story. It also overwhelms the movie’s redemptive ending. Shock for shock’s sake is a flawed concept that ultimately turns off more people than it attracts.

Continue Reading

Trending