Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Adopting Audrey’ Review: Jena Malone Puts Herself Up for Adoption

Published

on

‘Adopting Audrey’ Review: Jena Malone Puts Herself Up for Adoption

Malone’s outstanding means to make an totally mediocre character sparkle cannot save this unusual movie.

For so long as there was impartial cinema, there have been protagonists who aren’t fairly prepared for maturity. From “Slacker” to “Frances Ha” to roughly 78 % of rejected Sundance submissions in any given yr, there’s a time honored custom of filmmakers discovering inspiration in these trying to squeeze just a few extra years out of their adolescence.

However with every passing movie about an artsy kind who can’t get their shit collectively, the strain on the subsequent filmmaker to justify the existence of their belated coming-of-age story will increase. When your viewers has seen these tropes as typically as we’ve got, you need to provide one thing greater than “wow, seems adulting is de facto arduous!” Sadly, “Adopting Audrey” falls wanting that normal. M. Cahill’s new movie a few lady who places herself up for adoption in her early thirties is just too unintentionally unusual to be an efficient drama, however too decided to be one to succeed as a comedy. The result’s a colorless retreading of well-worn beats with out a lot fascinating substance to point out for the hassle.

Once we meet Audrey, it’s instantly clear that her existence leaves so much to be desired. Floating via life in upstate New York, she works a depressing job at a name heart (that she’s quickly fired from), lives in a tragic condominium (that she’s quickly pressured to vacate), and will get most of her human contact from an totally unremarkable fuckbuddy (who quickly breaks up together with her). Estranged from her household and uninterested in the vagabond life that led her to carry seven jobs prior to now two years, she finds herself at a crossroads, armed with nothing greater than the conclusion that her present strategy isn’t working.

Audrey’s one supply of pleasure is watching cute animal YouTube movies on her cellphone every evening, and the algorithm ultimately exhibits her an advert for one thing known as grownup adoption. The pattern permits younger adults to hunt a second set of oldsters to assist information them via the challenges of maturity. Considering she has nothing to lose, Audrey throws her hat into the ring.

Advertisement

After just a few unsuccessful interviews, she meets Sunny (Emily Kuroda) and Otto (Robert Starvation-Bühler), two remarried widows trying to develop their household. Or not less than, that’s what Sunny is searching for. She meets with Audrey with out telling her stereotypically gruff German husband that she desires to undertake an grownup, assuming that he’ll come round as soon as she introduces them.

It might be a stretch to say the plan “works,” but it surely goes much better than it ought to have. Otto doesn’t fairly perceive the thought, however can’t discover a purpose to object to it both. They comply with “undertake” Audrey for a six-month take a look at run, although it’s by no means fairly clear how anybody (together with the viewers) is meant to profit from the association.

Audrey doesn’t stay together with her new “dad and mom,” however steadily exhibits up for dinner with Sunny and Otto (and his getting old mom) and helps with some family chores. Finally, she and Otto make plans to construct a yard treehouse for his grandchildren. The undertaking results in a number of allegedly humorous scenes that resemble a scrapped CBS sitcom pilot with the snort tracks eliminated, in addition to some father-daughter bonding between Otto and Audrey.

When Otto isn’t going comically apeshit about steaks being undercooked at a barbecue or doing a bizarre Chevy Chase impression as he will get sawdust in his face, he finds time to take heed to Audrey’s issues and provide some knowledge. We be taught that Audrey blames her failure to launch on the truth that her pet hen was run over by a automotive when she was eight years previous, and Otto offers some robust love as he encourages her to maneuver on from her twenty years of poultry trauma. She additionally loses a finger and will get it reattached sooner or later, however that’s neither right here nor there. Few issues are actually resolved, however each Audrey and her dad and mom find yourself discovering their lives barely improved by the experiment.

In a meandering, character-driven movie, a compelling protagonist can cowl a large number of structural sins. Sadly, “Adopting Audrey” doesn’t have one. Not solely are Audrey’s profession and private life going nowhere, however she’s not devoting the misplaced power to anything both. She exhibits no ambition (her answer to dropping her job is discovering a second set of oldsters!), demonstrates few actual abilities, and principally squanders the alternatives that she does get. She doesn’t have sufficient of a persona to make her aimless wandering appear entertaining, nor has she confronted a severe sufficient problem to generate a lot sympathy. In the long run, you’d be forgiven for questioning why anybody felt compelled to provide this slice of her life the cinematic therapy.

Advertisement

None of which is to say that Jena Malone is unhealthy within the titular function. Fairly the other! The actress finds a strategy to inject some film star sparkle into an totally unremarkable character, elevating the movie into one thing that usually borders on watchable. Her efficiency is each a testomony to her charisma and a chilling reminder of what the film might have was with a much less competent star. 

Very similar to its eponymous protagonist, “Adopting Audrey” makes no makes an attempt to set the world on hearth. Cahill demonstrates minimal storytelling ambition, filling the 90 minutes with normal shot-reverse shot dialogue and sitcom-esque establishing pictures. And the movie by no means fairly figures out what story it desires to inform, fluctuating between makes an attempt at severe drama and one thing that, for lack of a greater phrase, might in all probability be described as comedy. In its greatest moments, “Adopting Audrey” acknowledges how arduous it may be to suit all the items of your life collectively to type one thing coherent. Sadly, the movie suffers from the very same downside.

Grade: C-

Vertical Leisure will launch “Adopting Audrey” in theaters and on VOD on Friday, August 26.

Signal Up: Keep on prime of the most recent breaking movie and TV information! Join our E-mail Newsletters right here.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Film offers 'Hard Truths' about why some people are happy — and others are miserable

Published

on

Film offers 'Hard Truths' about why some people are happy — and others are miserable

Marianne Jean-Baptiste, left, and Michele Austin play sisters in Hard Truths.

Bleecker Street


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Bleecker Street

In the many beautifully observed working-class dramedies he’s made over the past five decades, the British writer and director Mike Leigh has returned again and again to one simple yet endlessly resonant question: Why are some people happy, while others are not? Why does Nicola, the sullen 20-something in Leigh’s 1990 film, Life Is Sweet, seem incapable of even a moment’s peace or pleasure? By contrast, how does Poppy, the upbeat heroine of Leigh’s 2008 comedy, Happy-Go-Lucky, manage to greet every misfortune with a smile?

Leigh’s new movie, Hard Truths, could have been titled Unhappy-Go-Lucky. It follows a middle-aged North London misanthrope named Pansy, who’s played, in the single greatest performance I saw in 2024, by Marianne Jean-Baptiste.

You might know Jean-Baptiste from Leigh’s wonderful 1996 film, Secrets & Lies, in which she played a shy, unassuming London optometrist seeking out her birth mother. But there’s nothing unassuming about Pansy, who leads a life of seething, unrelenting misery. She spends most of her time indoors, barking orders and insults at her solemn husband, Curtley, and their 22-year-old son, Moses.

Advertisement

Pansy keeps a spotless home, but the blank walls and sparse furnishings are noticeably devoid of warmth, cheer or personality. When she isn’t cleaning, she’s trying to catch up on sleep, complaining about aches, pains and exhaustion. Sometimes she goes out to shop or run errands, only to wind up picking fights with the people she meets: a dentist, a salesperson, a stranger in a parking lot.

Back at home, she unloads on Curtley and Moses about all the indignities she’s been subjected to and the general idiocy of the world around her. Pansy has an insult comedian’s ferocious wit and killer timing. While you wouldn’t necessarily want to bump into her on the street, she makes for mesmerizing, even captivating on-screen company.

Leigh is often described as a Dickensian filmmaker, and for good reason; he’s a committed realist with a gift for comic exaggeration. Like nearly all Leigh’s films, Hard Truths emerged from a rigorous months-long workshop process, in which the director worked closely with his actors to create their characters from scratch. As a result, Jean-Baptiste’s performance, electrifying as it is, is also steeped in emotional complexity; the more time we spend with Pansy, the more we see that her rage against the world arises from deep loneliness and pain.

Leigh has little use for plot; he builds his stories from the details and detritus of everyday life, drifting from one character to the next. Tuwaine Barrett is quietly heartbreaking as Pansy’s son, Moses, who isolates himself and spends his time either playing video games or going on long neighborhood walks. Pansy’s husband, Curtley, is harder to parse; he’s played by the terrific David Webber, with a passivity that’s both sympathetic and infuriating.

The most significant supporting character is Pansy’s younger sister, Chantelle, played by the luminous Michele Austin, another Secrets & Lies alumn. Chantelle could scarcely be more different from her sister: She’s a joyous, contented woman with two adult daughters of her own, and she does everything she can to break through to Pansy. In the movie’s most affecting scene, Chantelle drags her sister to a cemetery to pay their respects to their mother, whose sudden death five years ago, we sense, is at the core of Pansy’s unhappiness.

Advertisement

At the same time, Leigh doesn’t fill in every blank; he’s too honest a filmmaker to offer up easy explanations for why people feel the way they feel. His attitude toward Pansy — and toward all the prickly, outspoken, altogether marvelous characters he’s given us — is best expressed in that graveside scene, when Chantelle wraps her sister in a tight hug and tells her, with equal parts exasperation and affection: “I don’t understand you, but I love you.”

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Almodóvar Ponders Death and the Lives Preceding it from “The Room Next Door”

Published

on

Movie Review:  Almodóvar Ponders Death and the Lives Preceding it from “The Room Next Door”

In his mid ’70s, it’s only natural that the great Spanish filmmaker Pedro Almodóvar should turn his attentions to reflecting on lives lived, and questions of how one wants life to end with his latest film.

But in boiling down and adapting the Sigrid Nunez novel “What Are You Going Through” into “The Room Next Door,” Almodóvar has conjured up the blithe, arid banalities of Woody Allen at his most pretentious. He squanders two Oscar winners and an Emmy winner in a drab, lifeless story in which characters recite passages from poetry and James Joyce from memory and watch Buster Keaton’s silent classic “Seven Chances” as they ponder a planned suicide and melodramatic strings drone on in the score.

All that’s missing are a few mentions of “Mahler”and you’d have yourself a companion piece to any one of a dozen later Allen films, the ones without a laugh or a light moment to recommend them.

Julianne Moore plays Ingrid, a busy, best-selling author of “fictionalized” biographies and non-fiction who learns of an old friend’s cancerous decline from a mutual acquaintance who comes to a book signing.

Martha (Tilda Swinton) was once a combat correspondant. Now she’s in a New York hospital, longing to go home. As booked-up Ingrid — not a “close” friend — sets aside bigger and bigger chunks of her days to take Martha’s calls and visit her once she comes home to her roomy Manhattan flat to recover from her latest treatment, they reminisce over their careers — especially Martha’s.

Advertisement

They talk about “New York in the ’80s,” Martha’s daughter, flashing back to the troubled Vietnam vet father the child never knew and joke about a “shared lover,” and chuckle as they compare “enthusiastic” notes.

Martha also lets on as to how she’s prepped herself for “the end,” and how her “experimental treatment…survival feels almost disappointing.”

When things take a turn, Ingrid is who Martha confides in. She figures that her life of fame won through risk in war zones means “I deserve a good death.” Ingrid’s involvement drifts towards “the ask.” Martha wants to take a “suicide pill.” She wants to do it in Woodstock, in a posher-than-posh AirBnB. And she wants Ingrid in “The Room Next Door” when she does it — for companionship, and for dealing with the legal complexity of what comes after.

Whatever life there was in the Nunez novel seems bleached out of this meandering, claustrophobic melodrama that that Ingrid finds herself trapped in. That “shared lover” (John Turturro) is still in her life, a friend she can confide in and get advice from.

But this extraordinary situation barely takes on the gravitas demanded. Some anecdotes do nothing to illuminate character or this predicament. And the comic possibilities — this is like asking a casual acquaintance of long standing to oh, babysit, dogsit, help you move, co-sign a loan or the like.

Advertisement

Why didn’t Larry David and Jerry Seinfeld ever get around to assisted suicide as an “inconvenience?”

Moore is too good an actress to not let us feel the gut-punch of this turn of events. Swinton, who takes on a cadaverous in the later acts, easily fits our mental picture of a famous female war reporter — flinty, a little butch, blunt about her success and her failings and pragmatic about her goals.

Ingrid’s last goal is to die with dignity, with a writer she trusts perhaps taking an interest in her journals and by extension, her life story. That’s cynical, but letting Ingrid (and the viewer) figure that out had all sorts of dramatic possibilities.

It’s all perfectly high-minded and polished, but all of this could have been treated with more spark than comes across here. The epilogue that comes after a disappointing third act feels like both a stunt and one last let down that a legendary filmmaker delivers in adapting a novel he was either too serious about, or that he didn’t take seriously enough.

Rating: PG-13, suicide, profanity

Advertisement

Cast: Julianne Moore, Tilda Swinton, Alessandro Nivola and John Turturro

Credits: Scripted and directed by Pedro Almodóvar, based on a novel by Sigrid Nunez. A Sony Pictures Classics release.

Running time: 1:43

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Pravinkoodu Shappu movie review: This Basil Joseph, Soubin Shahir flick is deceptive, comical but doesn’t pack a punch

Published

on

Pravinkoodu Shappu movie review: This Basil Joseph, Soubin Shahir flick is deceptive, comical but doesn’t pack a punch

Pravinkoodu Shappu movie review: When we think of the perfect whodunit mystery, the names that automatically spring to mind are Agatha Christie and Hercule Poirot. And Malayalam cinema has been serving up some neat murder mysteries in recent times. (Also Read – Malaikottai Vaaliban producer says Mohanlal is hurt by Barroz’s failure: ‘Audience tore apart the film’)

Pravinkoodu Shappu movie review: Basil Joseph stars in a new thriller.

Joining this list is director Sreeraj Sreenivasan’s film, Pravinkoodu Shappu (Pravinkoodu toddy shop), starring Basil Joseph, Soubin Shahir and Chandini Sreedharan. Set in Thrissur, the movie revolves around a small toddy shop and a murder that occurs there.

What’s it about?

One night, as rain beats down relentlessly, a group of men, including the wealthy and goonish toddy shop owner ‘Komban’ Babu and the toddy shop worker Kannan (Soubin Shahir), sit inside the toddy shop busy playing cards once the regular customers go home. Suddenly, one of the men finds Babu hanging from the ceiling and mayhem ensues. Former military man Sunil takes charge of the situation in the shop. As they wait for the police to arrive, the group of men start discussing what could have happened to Babu.

They ascertain that it’s murder. Sunil announces that one of them could be the culprit and prevents anyone from leaving the shop. Police inspector Santhosh (Basil Jodeph) lands up at the toddy shop with his team and it’s now up to him to investigate and find the murderer in 10 days. What happens next and who is responsible for the murder of Sunil forms the rest of the story.

Advertisement

The director uses the first half of the film to narrate the backstories of some of the main characters like Babu, real estate agent Sunil and worker Kannan using Santhosh and his investigative technique as the catalyst. As Santhosh questions each of the men present on that night, the audience discovers that Babu was a thug and his unpopularity in the village was based on numerous incidents. Sreeraj Sreenivasan gives us insight into not only each of the men in the toddy shop, but also into Kannan’s wife, Merinda (Chandini Sreedharan) and eccentric Santhosh as well, who seems to have a troubled past.

Should you watch it?

The first half of the movie proceeds really slowly and does test your patience, but the scenes are made more engaging by the antics of the characters and their witty remarks and dark humour. If you think it’s going to be a straightforward murder mystery, the director, using a non-linear approach, suddenly throws a curveball as the second half proceeds. As Basil Joseph digs deeper into this murder, there are more red herrings and the climax ends up being convoluted, thanks to the loose threads and many subplots (for instance, the stories of some characters were unnecessary and didn’t add too much value; and the suspicious behaviour of some of them to throw us off track). Thus, the climax felt a little underwhelming.

Director Sreeraj Sreenivasan, who has also written the story, has tried to give us a dark comic murder mystery in which every character infuses humour into the story through dialogues and/or their behaviour. However, the story itself and how it is narrated is a tad flawed, which at times is quite frustrating. The whodunnit is held together and engages you, thanks largely to the talented Basil Joseph who, with his sharp dialogue delivery and innocent yet comical expressions, elicits laughs as well as appreciation. He effortlessly carries the film on his shoulders. Soubin Shahir and Chandini Sreedharan are great value additions with their performances.

On the whole, Pravinkoodu Shappu has good performances and is a decent watch, but for a whodunit, just lacks the big punch one expects.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending