Connect with us

Movie Reviews

1984 Movie Reviews – Exterminator 2, Ninja III: The Domination, and A Soldier's Story | The Nerdy

Published

on

1984 Movie Reviews – Exterminator 2, Ninja III: The Domination, and A Soldier's Story | The Nerdy
by Sean P. Aune | September 14, 2024September 14, 2024 10:30 am EDT

Welcome to an exciting year-long project here at The Nerdy. 1984 was an exciting year for films giving us a lot of films that would go on to be beloved favorites and cult classics. Imagine a world where This is Spinal Tap and Repo Man hit theaters on the same day. That is the world of 1984.

We’re going to pick and choose which movies we hit, but right now the list stands at nearly three dozen.

Yes, we’re insane, but 1984 was that great of a year for film.

The articles will come out on the same day the films hit theaters in 1984 so that it is their true 40th anniversaries. All films are also watched again for the purposes of these reviews and are not being done from memory.

Advertisement

This time around, it’s Sept. 14, 1984, and we’re off to see Exterminator 2, Ninja III: The Domination, and A Soldier’s Story.

 

Exterminator 2

When I watched Exterminator back in 1980/2020, I did not think four years later I would be reviewing a sequel.

John Eastland (Robert Ginty) has still been making his way around New York City from time to time with his flamethrower, dishing out his own form of justice. As the sequel kicks off, Eastland finds four men robbing a store and kills two of them, unaware they worked for X (Mario Van Peebles), and one of them was his brother. X vows revenge while also putting together a deal for a huge shipment of cocaine that he feels will let him take control of the city. Along the way, X kills an old friend of Eastland’s as well as his girlfriend, setting up the Exterminator to have plenty of reasons for taking down his budding criminal empire.

Advertisement

I was unaware they could make a worse film in the Exterminator series, but they succeeded.

There are massive leaps in logic throughout the film of people just seemingly figuring things out. But, by far, the funniest part comes when John and Caroline (Deborah Geffner) go through Central Park on a date, and stop to watch some break dancers… and continue to watch them. One has to remember this film was released by Cannon Film Distributors, which also released Breakin’ and Breakin’ 2: Electric Boogaloo in this year. Cannon really went all-in on break dancing in 1984.

The film isn’t entertaining in the “it’s so bad, it’s good” way. It’s just bad. The script is laughable and you spend most of the movie wondering how X thinks $500,000 worth of cocaine – which fits in just one duffle bag – is going to be enough for him to take over the city. A plan he states multiple times.

This is a definite pass.

 

Advertisement

Ninja III: The Domination

I lived in Phoenix, Arizona, from 1971 to 1978. Both my parents were raised there.

We had no idea the Valley of the Sun had many issues with ninjas.

Christie Ryder (Lucinda Diskey) is a telephone linewoman, and while working she spots a ninja dying in the desert who had just engaged in a lengthy fight on a golf course. (It actually makes sense in the film despite making no sense here) She runs over to check on him, and his spirit possesses her, making her into his vessel of vengeance against those who killed him. She ends up falling for a policeman who was involved in the death of the ninja and later has to try to fight the ninja spirit from killing him as well.

This movie tries hard to cash in on the ninja crazy of the early 1980s, but it is just so off-the-wall that it is distracting. You have the fact the ninjas are all running around Phoenix – which, even if you never lived there, it’s distracting as the desert setting makes no sense – horrible special effects, and a very odd sex scene involving V8. Yes, as in the juice. And it is more of a cringe-inducing moment than anything sexy.

Once again, this is a film from Cannon Film Distributors, and while there is no breakdancing, Diskey is the woman in both Breakin’ films. In other words, she starred in three Cannon films in one year. You have to respect her grind.

Advertisement

This film is, once again, bad, but it’s good for some laughs such as the incredibly bad floating sword scene. It’s worth checking out as part of several 80s trends, but don’t expect to walk away loving it.

And just think of the poor residents of Phoenix who have had to put up so many ninjas.

A Soldier’s Story

After watching two films by Cannon Film Distributors, it was nice to see something completely different.

Based on a play, CPT. Richard Davenport (Howard E. Rollins Jr.) is sent to Fort Neal in Louisiana to investigate the murder of Master Sergeant Vernon Waters (Adolph Caesar). Davenport uncovers many secrets of the segregated base operating in the Jim Crow South during the time of World War II.

The film is engaging from start to finish, although there are times when you wish for a bit less of the murder mystery and more of just the soldiers’ lives. They are fully fleshed-out characters; you want to learn more about them, but there is insufficient time.

Advertisement

It’s not a cheerful watch as you hear about what everyone is going through, or what the ultimate reason is for the murder, but it’s a worthwhile use of your time for some amazing perfomances.

1984 Movie Reviews will return on Sept. 19 with Amadeus!


Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

KCR Movie Review

Published

on

KCR Movie Review

KCR, a political drama set against a Telangana backdrop, features comedian-turned-actor Rakesh in the lead role. Known for his appearances in the popular TV show Jabardasth, Rakesh not only stars as the protagonist but also produces the film under his home banner. Directed by Garudavega Anji, the movie released in theaters on November 22 and is now streaming on Aha. Despite its ambitious concept, KCR struggles to deliver a gripping experience.

Plot
The story begins in Rangabai Tanda, a village in Kesavaravupally, Warangal district. The protagonist, Keshavachandra Ramavath (Rakesh), is a middle-class youth who idolizes Telangana Chief Minister K. Chandrashekar Rao (KCR). His unwavering admiration earns him the nickname “Chota KCR.” Keshava is romantically pursued by Manju (Ananya Krishnan), a girl from the same village, who dreams of marrying him.

However, Keshava’s joy over his village’s agricultural prosperity is short-lived when he learns that their land is marked for acquisition to construct a ring road. Shocked and determined to protect his community, Keshava refuses his arranged marriage with Manju and instead declares that he will marry a city girl. During a heated family discussion, he challenges his elders, vowing to bring KCR himself to his wedding or cancel it altogether.

The second half chronicles Keshava’s journey to Hyderabad to fulfill this promise. What happens next? Does Keshava succeed in inviting KCR to his wedding? The answers form the crux of the narrative.

Analysis
The story unfolds during two key periods: the time leading up to the formation of Telangana and its aftermath. It highlights the struggles of K. Chandrashekar Rao (KCR) in achieving statehood and his subsequent governance. The first half focuses on the protagonist’s deep admiration for KCR, while the second half revolves around his determination to invite the leader to his wedding, setting the stage for his journey to the city.

Advertisement

The director ensures that equal importance is given to the roles of both the hero and heroine, as well as their families. The integration of the village as a significant element in the story is commendable. However, the characterization falters as the hero, initially portrayed as a proud and content village youth, suddenly declares his preference for a city girl and urban life, creating inconsistencies in his arc.

The comedy scenes involving the hero and his friends fail to land effectively, feeling forced and uninspired. While the film attempts to convey emotional depth, many sequences come across as overacted, especially those featuring Rakesh. Furthermore, the minor characters, portraying villagers, lack impactful performances, leaving the narrative underwhelming.

Although Rakesh’s intent in crafting the content is evident, the lack of thorough preparation and rushed execution diminishes the film’s overall potential.

Performances
Rakesh: As both actor and producer, Rakesh demonstrates sincerity, but his comedic strengths don’t translate well into this film. Emotional scenes feel overacted, detracting from the film’s impact.
Ananya Krishnan: Delivers a decent performance as Manju but is limited by her character’s development.
Supporting Cast: Notable names like Thanikella Bharani and Thagubothu Ramesh make brief appearances but fail to elevate the narrative.

Technical Aspects
Direction: Garudavega Anji captures the rural essence of Telangana through impressive visuals but struggles to weave a compelling story.
Music: Charan Arjun’s compositions and background score are average, lacking memorable tunes.
Cinematography: Rural settings are beautifully depicted, thanks to Anji’s expertise behind the camera.
Editing: Madhu ensures a decent pace, but the screenplay limits the overall experience.

Advertisement

Verdict
KCR aims to tell a heartfelt story about a village youth’s passion for his community and hero-worship for KCR. While the intent is commendable, the execution falls short in connecting with audiences. The narrative lacks the emotional depth and comedic charm necessary to make it engaging. With better writing and stronger characterization, this film could have been more impactful.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: A Tale Trapped at “The Crossroads,” Never Going Anywhere

Published

on

Movie Review: A Tale Trapped at “The Crossroads,” Never Going Anywhere

“The Crossroads” is the sort of movie you get when you park two attractive but bland young actors on a modestly scenic piece of real estate and take romance pretty much off the table.

A stunningly dull chat-a-thon of silences, evasive question-and-answer conversations, abrupt, contrived arguments, literary name dropping and cliched third act “diagnoses” explaining much of what’s come before, it’s as good an argument as any against “keeping things simple,” tuning out the outside world and such.

You’d die of boredom.

Emily Coupe arrives at the titular filling station/convenience store/diner on the border between Arizona and New Mexico, jumps out of a car with her backpack, guitar, torn tight jeans and pink hair extensions, only to be “rescued” by “a cowboy” played by Nick Ballard.

“Star” is her name. She wants to be a singer-songwriter. But she’s fled LA, heading for “Dubuque.” Not that she gives this away any time soon.

Logan isn’t especially friendly, but he offers her a lift in his ancient Ford pickup, talks about “weather comin’” (We can see the skies. Nope.) and takes her to his remote farmhouse.

Advertisement

Don’t get your hopes up. This isn’t a horror movie.

Star is closed-off, working out some things. Logan is shut-down, dealing with his own issues. The script has them spend 95 minutes doling out even the tiniest hint of information about their names, their backgrounds, the time setting we’re dealing with and the problems they’re struggling to overcome.

Director Douglas A. Raine and screenwriter Ginia Desmond break that fundamental convenant they’re honor bound to take with the audience. Tell us what your movie is about, tell us who the characters are and don’t bore us to death waiting around for something — ANYthing — to happen.

Only somebody who thinks leaving LA for Dubuque is a fun idea could conjure up a leading lady dense enough to say “A clothesline? I’ve never used one.” Even if you haven’t, honey, there’s no danged sense admitting it.

Only a “cowboy” who hides his rodeo trophies in haystacks, who actually farms “hemp” now (not that we see “work” of any sort) when he isn’t reading “The Invisible Man” (H.G. Wells, 1897), with the Quran and select works of Carl Jung on his DIY bookshelves, could offer up this as a comeback.

Advertisement

“You’ll have to figure it out.”

Rating: profanity, adult subject matter

Cast: Nick Ballard, Emily Coupe

Credits: Directed by Douglas A. Raine, scripted by Ginia Desmond. A Desktop Entertainment release on FreeVee, Amazon Prime, etc.

Running time: 1:35

Advertisement

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Mura Movie Review

Published

on

Mura Movie Review

Mura is a Malayalam action thriller directed by Muhammad Musthafa and produced by Rhea Shibu under the HR Pictures banner. Featuring Hridu Haroon, Anujith, Yedu Krishna, and Jobin Das in lead roles, the film released in theaters on November 8, garnering a positive response. It became available for streaming on Amazon Prime from December 25, 2024. Let’s dive into the plot and analysis of this gripping thriller.

Plot Summary:
The story revolves around four close friends – Anand (Hridu Haroon), Shaji (Jobin Das), Manu (Yedu Krishna), and Manav (Anujith). Anand comes from a middle-class family, while the rest hail from lower-middle-class backgrounds. Struggling with studies and responsibilities, the group often resorts to reckless escapades. To meet their financial needs, they ally with local gangsters.

Their association leads them to Ane (Suraj Venjaramoodu), a trusted henchman of gangster Ramadevi (Mala Parvathi). Impressed by their fearlessness, Ane assigns them a high-stakes mission to retrieve hidden black money from Madurai. What happens during this mission and how it changes their lives forms the crux of the story.

Analysis:
Mura captures the essence of youthful recklessness and camaraderie. Suresh Babu’s story brings to life the struggles of four young men navigating life’s challenges with misplaced priorities. The screenplay keeps the narrative tight, seamlessly blending action and emotion without overdramatizing.

The first half establishes the boys’ bonding and their initial forays into the gangster world, while the second half delves into their confrontation with larger forces. The transitions feel organic, and the film maintains a naturalistic tone throughout, drawing audiences into the emotional journey of its protagonists.

Advertisement

Performances:
The four lead actors excel in portraying their characters, embodying the mannerisms and attitudes of rebellious youth with authenticity. Their performances feel spontaneous and genuine, enhancing the film’s realism.

Suraj Venjaramoodu and Mala Parvathi deliver solid performances, effortlessly adding gravitas to their roles as seasoned criminals.

Technical Aspects:
Cinematography: Fazil Nazar’s visuals stand out, particularly in action and chase sequences, elevating the overall tension.
Music and Background Score: Christy Joby’s background score is a significant strength, with the theme music being a notable highlight.
Editing: Chaman Chacko’s crisp editing ensures there’s no room for unnecessary scenes, maintaining a steady pace throughout.

Final Verdict:
Mura is an engaging action thriller that combines raw emotion with edge-of-the-seat moments. It successfully delivers a message about the importance of making the right choices in life and the consequences of veering off the moral path. Despite minor flaws, the film’s grounded approach and impactful storytelling make it a worthwhile watch.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending