Connect with us

Entertainment

John Aniston, ‘Days of Our Lives’ actor and Jennifer Aniston’s father, dead at 89 | CNN

Published

on

John Aniston, ‘Days of Our Lives’ actor and Jennifer Aniston’s father, dead at 89 | CNN



CNN
 — 

John Aniston, a veteran actor identified for his work on the daytime drama “Days of Our Lives,” has died, his daughter, actress Jennifer Aniston, shared on Monday.

He was 89.

“You had been probably the most lovely people I ever knew. I’m so grateful that you just went hovering into the heavens in peace – and with out ache. And on 11/11 no much less! You at all times had good timing,” Jennifer Aniston wrote in an announcement shared on Instagram. “That quantity will ceaselessly maintain a good better which means for me now.”

Advertisement

The “Pals” star started her publish by writing “Candy papa…⁣ John Anthony Aniston.”⁣

The actor appeared in quite a few TV collection and almost three thousand episodes of “Days of Our Lives” over the course of his lengthy profession.

“I’ll love you until the tip of time,” Aniston concluded her caption. “Don’t neglect to go to.”

Aniston was born John Anastassakis on the Greek island of Crete in 1933. He emigrated to the US when he was 10, and his household shortened their surname to Aniston.

Earlier than he turned a cleaning soap star, Aniston served within the US Navy and appeared in an off-Broadway musical, Cleaning soap Opera Digest reported.

Advertisement

He acquired his huge break when he was forged within the long-running cleaning soap “Love of Life” and later “Seek for Tomorrow.” However he didn’t grow to be a family title till he joined “Days of our Lives” in 1985 as “romantic villain” Victor Kiriakis, a legal with a penchant for charming the ladies of Salem, Illinois.

Kirakis, like Aniston, hailed from Greece however was rather more sinister: He was a mobster who ran a prostitution ring on the town. Over the course of the collection, Kiriakis skilled a number of adjustments of coronary heart and bounced forwards and backwards between his lawbreaking gangster persona and loving household man hoping to win again his grownup youngsters. All advised, Aniston appeared on the collection on and off for 37 years.

Throughout his stints on soaps, Aniston opened a restaurant in New York, divorced his first spouse, Nancy Dow, and married costar Sherry Rooney and moved to Los Angeles, in accordance with a 1986 Cleaning soap Opera Digest profile of Aniston.

Aniston was stunned his daughter deliberate to observe him into present enterprise. In a 2019 interview with the Tv Academy Basis, Aniston mentioned he discovered his daughter had been calling his agent to ask for auditions whereas he was showing on “Seek for Tomorrow.”

“I advised her, ‘You don’t wish to be in present enterprise. Present enterprise stinks,’” he mentioned. “I inform everyone who desires to be an actor, don’t be an actor, be one thing else. As a result of if my telling (them) to remain out of present enterprise is gonna preserve them out, they shouldn’t be in it within the first place.”

Advertisement

After all, Aniston’s daughter didn’t pay attention, and went on to star in probably the most profitable sitcoms of all time, and grow to be probably the most well-known actresses on the planet.

In a 1990 interview with E! Information alongside his daughter, Aniston provided each fatherly reward and sobering steering: “Jennifer is a pure expertise,” he mentioned to his daughter’s embarrassment, however reminded her that expertise doesn’t at all times lead to an extended profession.

However Aniston’s personal profession in soaps lasted greater than 50 years, and in June, he was awarded a Lifetime Achievement Emmy on the Daytime Emmy Awards. He didn’t attend the ceremony, however his daughter toasted him in a transferring speech.

“For over 30 years, his dedication to (“Days”) has gained him respect and admiration of his fellow actors, deep friendships and thrilled hundreds of thousands of followers all over the world,” she mentioned. “His profession is actually the definition of lifetime achievement.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Nightbitch’ Movie Review: Amy Adams Leads Uneven Body Horror Comedy

Published

on

‘Nightbitch’ Movie Review: Amy Adams Leads Uneven Body Horror Comedy

‘Body horror’ may not be the most accurate descriptor to qualify Marielle Heller’s Nightbitch, but the movie undoubtedly adopts many tropes when it focuses on Mother’s (Amy Adams) transformation from a human to a dog. Indeed, when a cyst appears on her back and reveals a large tail full of pus, one may be inclined to say that this dark comedy veers into such territory, and rightfully so. 

The ‘body horror’ itself is appropriately gross and immediately destabilizes both the audience and the protagonist, who discovers a side of her she didn’t realize she had until now. ‘Mother’ (both parent and kid characters are unnamed because it could be you, me, or anyone else) has been living absolute hell parenting her Son (played with an impeccable sense of comedic timing by twins Arleigh and Emmett Snowden). Like any mom at this stage in her life, she attempts to set unattainable goals for her child to be tended to, whether going to the library for a torturous ‘Book Babies’ session or taking her son to the park with almost certain death waiting for him if she doesn’t always pay close attention to what he is doing. 

Of course, it doesn’t help that her son is ineffably cute but incredibly chaotic (the innocent charm they have at this time is deadly for many parents who want to teach them the right way to do things patiently but are unable to do it because of how cute their child looks at all times). From saying the F-word in public to purposefully breaking dishes and then crying about it, he’s certainly not helping her mother have an easygoing time with him, as lovable as he may be. However, Mother’s life isn’t going the way she wants to. She is forced to do everything for her son and absent Husband (Scoot McNairy), which leads her to sacrifice the promising career she had in art to be a stay-at-home mom. At that moment, her sense of smell begins to develop, and she starts experiencing profound physical changes in her body that lead her to believe she is slowly transforming into a dog. 

Advertisement

In its opening scene, Heller, cinematographer Brandon Trost, and editor Anne McCabe intelligently represent Mother’s chaotic, overwhelming life through aesthetic choices reminiscent of Monia Chokri’s Babysitter. Extreme close-ups of Mother’s routine acts (putting butter in the pan and frying hash browns while attempting to subdue her son’s deafening cries), quickly edited together, pervert what the idealized ‘joys’ of being a mother are. In this case, Son acts more like a burden than the boy she unconditionally loves. Heller then directs her audience to Mother’s ragged hair, tired eyes, and wrinkles on her face that seem more apparent than they should, not because of her age but due to her constant sleeplessness and heightened stress levels. 

This immediately pulls us into the on-screen adaptation of Rachel Yoder’s book of the same name, to which Heller then takes an immediate dark turn (a bold swing for some who may not know what this film is about). The attentive filmmaker she has always been (see her masterpiece, A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood), Heller still ensures there’s a profound bond between Mother and Son, either through fleeting moments of love as she reads him a bedtime story or as they hold their hands together while running after dogs in a park. 

There’s a sweetness buried inside their relationship that has unfortunately been lost when Mother has been tasked to do everything to please him and her neglectful husband, who would rather fly away from familial problems than face them head-on. In fact, in one of the film’s most powerful scenes, Husband asks Mother, “What happened to my wife?” as he wonders how she became so depressed, bitter, and angry at herself, the world, and her husband. She bluntly responds: “She died in childbirth.” 

This seems to be Nightbitch’s central thesis, illustrated by an unexpected transformation into a fierce canine, which helps her reclaim the story she wants to make for herself. The metaphor is apt and sounds rich enough to be pushed to its fullest extent. But just as it’s about to go all in on its kooky, almost otherworldly storytelling, Heller decides to stop the movie dead in its tracks and not develop any of its ideas, nor the characters who seem rife with potential. For no reason whatsoever, the editorial (and thematic) choices begin to squander any attempt at fleshing anything out of its characters and central story. 

Advertisement

The end result seems more confounding than anything else because it feels like the movie is trying to do far too much in such a short time (98 minutes). As it moves away from the thrilling, almost unique body horror, Heller also loses her aesthetic impulses that made the movie’s first half so compelling and often funny to watch. 

The original source material may be too ambitious to transpose on screen. However, when so much of the movie does work in its opening section, it seems baffling that Nightbitch would lose its most interesting parts in favor of absolute nothingness. But it also seems afraid to commit to one genre or a thematic throughline,to keep us invested. Had it fully leaned into body horror, it could’ve gone in a completely different direction than its massively unconfident script allows. 

Thankfully, Adams always seems to give a damn and represents Mother’s psychological torment intelligently with enough empathy and compassion for the audience to attach themselves to her plight. Her most nail-biting line deliveries are expressed with the energy of a thousand flames (and how her eyes shift in key scenes exacerbates this feeling), alongside voiceover narration that solidifies all of the emotions she can’t express physically. But she’s also frequently outshined by the Snowden twins, who literally steal the spotlight from her and run away with it. 

Advertisement

They have no shame in doing so, either, with note-perfect comedic timing that balances out their charming, lovable exterior. The cutest kids are usually the most troublesome. Heller understands this inextricable fact and displays it to us for all the world to see. However, she shows an insatiable chemistry between the two that makes it instantly believable that Mother will do anything for her Son, even if it mentally and physically exhausts her. 

All of this is finely presented and depicted with thunderous energy during Nightbitch’s opening half. It’s why it feels so disappointing that Heller never fully commits to either her premise or the themes she lays out, concluding Nightbitch with an admittedly funny coda to an otherwise middling and disappointing affair. It may not be as bad as Heller’s feature directorial debut, but it certainly won’t be remembered as her finest effort, either, especially coming off the heels of her best-ever film. 

Nightbitch releases exclusively in theatres on December 6. 

Advertisement

About Post Author

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Talent agency Gersh acquires sports representation firm You First in major expansion

Published

on

Talent agency Gersh acquires sports representation firm You First in major expansion

Beverly Hills-based talent agency Gersh is acquiring Madrid-based sports representation firm You First in a major expansion that marks the firm’s entry into the highly competitive business of working with athletes.

The deal, announced Tuesday, doubles the agency’s staff to more than 600 people.

Additionally, the pact expands Gersh’s footprint to 22 offices in 14 countries. You First has more than 1,000 clients, including Spanish soccer player Fabián Ruiz and NBA player Jarrett Allen. Prior to the acquisition, Gersh did not represent athletes, but rather focused on actors, directors, writers and other talent.

“It felt essential for the agency to grow, change and evolve, and growth into the sports representation vertical was a central pillar and focus of where we felt we wanted to take the agency,” said managing partner Steve Gersh in an interview. “The area that we were where we felt there were the strongest tailwinds and biggest opportunity for growth, not only domestically but globally, was in sports and sports representation.”

Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

Advertisement

You First Chief Executive Juan Aísa said the Gersh partnership allows his business to offer “greater support for clients.” Aísa will join Gersh’s board and continue to run You First, while Steve Gersh will lead Gersh Sports, the agency said.

“Together, we’re building an ecosystem that goes beyond sports and entertainment representation to foster innovation and create new opportunities for global expansion,” Aísa said in a statement.

The deal comes after many agencies and management firms were impacted by last year’s dual Hollywood strikes. Those same companies are adapting to an entertainment industry in which athletes, actors and other celebrities are embarking on various business endeavors, which span social media videos, sports, music, TV and film.

Agencies, including WME owner Endeavor and Creative Artists Agency, evolved by growing and diversifying.

Gersh said that his agency is profitable and is looking at other potential acquisition opportunities.

Advertisement

“This is the start of the journey, not the end,” Gersh said.

Last year, the Gersh agency took on an investment from private equity firm Crestview Partners in an effort to grow the representation business. Crestview has a 45% ownership stake in Gersh, which was founded in 1949.

The You First acquisition is the second purchase in Gersh’s recent expansion. In January, the agency bought A3 Artists Agency’s digital and alternative content departments.

In addition to representing athletes, You First works with sports leagues and major brands such as Formula 1 and Starbucks on marketing campaigns.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Tamil film producers file petition seeking ban on movie reviews for three days

Published

on

Tamil film producers file petition seeking ban on movie reviews for three days

Tamil Film Active Producers Association (TFAPA) filed a writ petition in Madras High Court seeking a ban on movie reviews for three days from release on social media platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and X. According to The Hindu, the film body sought direction from the Centre and State government. The case will be heard on Tuesday, December 3.

The film body requested the Centre and State government to come up with guidelines to be followed by online film critics while reviewing movies on their YouTube Channels, X, Facebook and other social media platforms.

On November 20, another association, Tamil Nadu Producers Council (TNPC) issued a statement asking theatre owners to ban YouTube channels from recording video reviews and opinions inside the theatre premises after the film screenings.

After the issuance of the statement, some of the theatres stopped allowing YouTube channels from entering the theatre premises.

The TNPC’s statement mentioned that the reviewers should stop personal attacks and ‘incitement of hatred under the guise of film reviews’. They mentioned such reviews affected Indian 2, Vettaiyan and Kanguva.

The statements from Tamil Film Active Producers Association (TFAPA) and Tamil Nadu Film Producers Council (TNPC) indicate that Suriya’s Kanguva is the latest film that was affected by harsh reviews that personally attacked the makers and actor.

Published On:

Dec 3, 2024

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending