Entertainment
Director Andrea Arnold on not trying to please anyone and reconnecting with nature
“I’m not attempting to please anybody,” British filmmaker Andrea Arnold explains, talking about her work. “I’m attempting to only determine one thing out. And I at all times have this concept that when you try to determine one thing out that’s your personal factor and that it’s an trustworthy endeavor that individuals will at all times reply to that, reasonably than one thing that’s formulaic.”
Whereas Arnold is referencing her movies extra usually, the sentiment particularly applies to her most up-to-date mission, a quiet, introspective documentary known as “Cow.” Shot over the course of 4 years in between different work, together with directing the second season of HBO’s “Massive Little Lies,” “Cow” is an intimate portrait of a dairy cow named Luma. It follows Luma from the start of one among her calves to her dying at Park Farm in Kent, England, and the filmmaker tapped cinematographer Magda Kowalczyk to assist reveal Luma’s inside world. Whereas Arnold wasn’t at all times positive the place the footage would lead, she did have one purpose in thoughts because the mission unfolded.
“It was about displaying her aliveness,” explains Arnold, whose different movies embody “American Honey” and “Fish Tank.” “Like, ‘Are we going to have the ability to see that? Are we going to have the ability to see the soul?’ Some individuals would argue, ‘Do we have now a soul? What’s the soul?’ In all probability when you Google it there are 1,000,000 explanations and a few individuals will say there isn’t one. However there’s little doubt that all of us have one thing that isn’t simply our bodily self. We’ve want, we have now emotions, we have now ideas — and all of us have our personal. John O’Donohue, the Irish poet, says ‘the wild and visual magnificence.’ I used to be attempting to indicate her wild and visual magnificence.”
Right here Arnold discusses the making of “Cow,” its inevitable ending and the way the documentary pertains to her earlier movies.
Did the concept for this movie come to you from one thing particular or did it develop over time?
I feel the will to make it comes from fairly a great distance again. I’ve at all times had a extremely huge relationship with nature, since I used to be a child. I used to be born on a housing property [in Dartford, England] and my mother was 16 when she had me — she had 4 children by the point she was 22 and my dad was not round. So nobody actually stopped me from going out, and throughout me was this sort of wilderness. And so I roamed from actually early on. I feel all of us have, left to our personal units, an instinctive relationship with nature.
Residing in London — I labored in TV after I first began — I received increasingly more disconnected from issues as a result of, after all, I’m not that child working round anymore. I spotted that dwelling within the metropolis you simply get very disconnected, so this movie was at all times form of brewing. I wasn’t fairly positive which type it will take. However then I simply thought someday, “Nicely, I’ll simply attempt to see if I can put a actuality to that — the consciousness of 1 animal. What about if I did that?” That’s the place it began with me. I feel after I first talked about it to somebody, it was like 9 years in the past.
What number of hours of footage did you shoot?
We filmed for about 30 days a 12 months, over 4 years. Not daily or something, however about 30 days every year. So I truly can’t bear in mind how a lot footage we had. However I went by way of the whole lot. And we had extra as a result of we needed to movie one other cow as insurance coverage in case Luma died immediately. All that footage was of one other cow, God bless her, however we didn’t have to make use of it. I at all times had a factor for Luma. And the opposite cow was beautiful. However we did put most of our vitality into Luma.
How do you solid a cow?
Once we had been wanting, the farmers would inform me in regards to the cows and so they mentioned at the start Luma was very feisty. And I assumed, “Oh, I like that. She’s feisty, that in all probability reveals some spirit and character.” I appreciated that she was feisty in that setting as a result of it was nearly like a remark. Prefer it was her spirit coming by way of. And she or he had this very beautiful, lovely white head [and] I assumed which may make it simpler to shoot her and comply with her.
There’s a extremely distinct emotional response that occurs once you spend 90 minutes that near an animal’s face. Was that intentional?
When you consider animals, we use them for his or her meat or their skins or their bones, or all of the issues that they bodily are. And I wished to make a film in regards to the bits you possibly can’t see, you possibly can’t contact — the emotions, the ideas, the need, the will. All this stuff which might be within the eyes which might be occurring, which might be a part of the aliveness of a being. What I attempted to do is to indicate you one thing we don’t bodily contact or see.
Was that difficult?
The factor is, I feel that we will’t know what she’s truly feeling or considering. However you will get an thought by wanting on the eyes. And you too can get an thought by her habits and the way in which she responds to issues. So I feel that’s the way you learn it: You learn it in the way in which she responds, the way in which she appears to be like and the way in which she behaves to her setting and the issues that occur.
We are able to’t know, in any respect, what she’s considering. We don’t even know what one another is considering. We are able to’t get inside one other particular person’s head. We are able to’t get inside a beetle’s head. We are able to’t get inside a cow’s head. So after I talked to Magda, the cinematographer, I mentioned, “Look, we’re simply going to indicate her in her setting, staying along with her head, specializing in her, and the way in which she responds to what occurs.” As a result of I don’t clarify something, and even attempt to, it leaves issues as much as [the viewer’s] creativeness about what she is likely to be feeling or considering or wanting. And I feel individuals’s life experiences will probably be completely different and they’ll in all probability interpret some issues otherwise.
Did Luma know you once you would arrive to movie her?
I didn’t wish to fake that we weren’t there. They’re used to having people round as a result of their lives are very managed. However we’re clearly proper in her face. And I at all times mentioned to Magda, “Look, if she does something, keep there. If one thing occurs and he or she’s reacting to the digital camera, preserve it working. Let that be a part of the movie as a result of that’s trustworthy about us being there.” And I feel at the start she did have quite a lot of responses to the digital camera. Generally she stared proper at us. I felt like her look modified over the time. In the beginning it felt a bit suspicious, a bit extra quizzical.
After which in direction of the tip, I felt like she felt seen by us. She felt accepted. Like she was used to it and he or she felt seen. And I don’t know whether or not I’m proper in that. However I do really feel prefer it’s fairly a profound factor, on some degree. As a result of to be seen, what does that truly imply? I don’t assume all people really feel seen. Clearly she didn’t know she was being filmed. However we had been standing there her and responding to her, having a connection and relationship the place when she does one thing we reply. There’s a connection and an change, a form of consciousness of one another’s existence. I ponder if her being seen and feeling seen meant that she felt her existence extra.
While you took this on, had been you conscious of Luma’s life trajectory and the way this story would finish?
Nicely, all dairy cows, as soon as they don’t give milk, are slaughtered. So I didn’t know however that was extremely doubtless the place it will finish as a result of that’s livestock’ existences after they’re not helpful anymore.
How do you are feeling “Cow” matches in with the remainder of your work?
I made a brief [film] known as “Milk,” which is a couple of mother who loses a child. And I really feel prefer it’s linked to this. Like, all of it feels linked. It actually does really feel a part of the whole lot I do. It’s clearly a really completely different manner of constructing one thing, however it feels completely linked by way of what it’s and the way it’s and what it’s about. Any individual at the moment mentioned to me they felt it was weirdly life-affirming but in addition powerful. And I really feel like [that] about all my movies. Hopefully, they’re a little bit of each of these. They cowl each — the truth that life will be wonderful and joyous, and it can be fairly powerful.
What’s tougher: directing a cow or directing a Hollywood actor?
Cows are simply what they’re, aren’t they? I feel that’s why persons are moved by Luma, as a result of she is what she is. And actors, they’re typically bringing quite a lot of private issues to what they do however they’re there representing one thing. They’re bringing their expertise to indicate you some emotion. And generally they go there with the emotion. However Luma is simply what she is. When you’re truly making movies you’re simply across the digital camera with individuals attempting to inform a narrative. Whether or not or not it’s with a cow or with Hollywood actors, it’s sort of the identical factor.
Entertainment
For TV reporters covering fires in L.A., the tragedy gets personal
Jacob Soboroff, a national correspondent for NBC News with deep roots in the community, showed viewers the remains of his family’s former home on Frontera Drive in Pacific Palisades.
This week, Soboroff visited the site of a nearby playground where he romped as a child. His father, longtime civic leader Steve Soboroff, had led the effort to renovate the recreation facility after it fell into disrepair. It was gone. The home of his pregnant sister’s in-laws, where she was staying during her own home’s renovation, was also leveled.
Soboroff no longer lives in Pacific Palisades. But he knows its now-unrecognizable streets as well as if he had a Google map in his head, he told The Times.
“The pictures don’t match the muscle memories,” he said. “I grew up here and we’d do … drills in school for an earthquake. It looks like what the city would look like after the Big One, not after a wildfire.”
Those feelings are now all too familiar. The world watched as large parts of the Los Angeles area burned this week, giving ample TV time to the national correspondents based in the city.
The stunning devastation that engulfed Pacific Palisades, Altadena and other neighborhoods entered the national consciousness through wall-to-wall TV news coverage, overshadowing major news events such as the funeral of former President Carter and the sentencing of Donald Trump in his New York hush money case. The unprecedented inferno filled screens with shocking images since Tuesday.
Often the biggest challenge for the L.A.-based journalists, who worked around the clock since the blazes broke out, was coping with their own emotions, fears and feelings of loss as they reported on their home city’s transformation into scenes that resembled war zones.
Fox News correspondent Jonathan Hunt reported on the flames that encroached Palisades Charter High School, where his 17-year-old daughter is a student. While informing viewers about the threat, he privately worried she would be back to remote learning after losing a year in the classroom during the pandemic.
Hunt was relieved that the school “was largely OK,” but local landmarks where he spent time with his children were wiped out.
“I was just wandering around the village area just now and much of the retail is gone,” he said. “The Starbucks we used to stop at so many days after school is just gone.”
Longtime CNN correspondent Nick Watt told viewers on Wednesday how after he finished his reporting he was headed to his home in Santa Monica to hose it down, hoping it would deter embers from starting a blaze.
“It’s extraordinary to cover something like this in your own community,” he said. “I’ve been covering fires for a long time. You have sympathy for people. Now I have empathy.”
Correspondents said they were deluged by West Coast-based colleagues, friends and strangers asking them to check if their homes were still standing.
Soboroff noted that having his reports stream on NBC News Now and social media sites such as TikTok brought in requests from around the world. In some cases, he didn’t have to check, knowing that whole blocks in Pacific Palisades were in ruins.
Hunt received inquiries as well, and went a step further for Kennedy, a former MTV host who is now a contributor at Fox News.
Kennedy, who was in New York, asked Hunt to enter her Palisades home, located less than 100 yards from structures that were gutted by the flames. She wanted him to gather certain framed family photographs and drawings made by her children. Hunt entered the undamaged structure, where he also retrieved a sword one of Kennedy’s relatives saved from World War I.
“I was dreading the idea of going to this friend’s house and having to send a photo of rubble,” Hunt said. “Thank God that I didn’t.”
Nancy Loo, a veteran Los Angeles-based reporter for NewsNation, was on the case Tuesday morning as she and her camera operator Nathan Fiery had covered numerous wildfires along the West Coast since she joined the network in 2020. They started traveling toward the blaze when they saw smoke in the direction of Culver City.
Loo joined NewsNation so she could be closer to family members, who she said were spared from the danger and destruction. But Fiery had been evacuated from his Hollywood Hills home and worked with the fear that it would be gone. (It was spared.)
Loo made her bones as a local New York anchor who reported for eight hours straight during the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. She moved on to become a reporter on Chicago’s WGN, where she frequently started her day covering a homicide that occurred overnight.
The destruction of Pacific Palisades is yet another traumatic scene she has to process, one of many over a long career.
“I’ve learned to compartmentalize because it does take an emotional toll,” Loo said.
Movie Reviews
Daaku Maharaaj Review – Gulte
2.75/5
2 Hr 27 Mins | Action | 12-01-2025
Cast – Nandamuri Balakrishna, Bobby Deol, Pragya Jaiswal, Shraddha Srinath, Urvashi Rautela, Chandini Chowdary, Shine Tom Chacko, Makarand Deshpande, Sachin Khedekar, Ravi Kishan, VTV Ganesh and others.
Director – Bobby Kolli
Producer – Suryadevara Naga Vamsi & Sai Soujanya
Banner – Sithara Entertainments & Fortune Four Cinemas
Music – Thaman S
Akhanda, Veera Simha Reddy & Bhagavanth Kesari, after delivering three back-to-back successful films, Nandamuri Balakrishna teamed up with Bobby Kolli, who delivered a blockbuster hit with his previous film, Waltair Veerayya and the production house, Sithara Entertainments. After grabbing the attention of the audience with its slick and stylish visuals in the teaser and trailer, the film was released in theatres today. Did Balakrishna deliver his fourth consecutive successful film? Did Bobby deliver another blockbuster after Waltair Veerayya? Did Sithara Entertainments continue its success streak after a memorable film like Lucky Baskhar? More importantly, did the slick and stylish visuals have the substance? Let’s find out with a detailed analysis.
What is it about?
Govind Gujjar(Makarand Deshpande) requests Nanaji to protect a little girl, Baby Vaishnavi and her family from the local MLA, Thrimurthulu Naidu and his brother(Sandeep Raj). Nanaji, while doing his job as the caretaker to the family, comes across a gang of Thakurs from Madhya Pradesh who runs Cocaine cultivation in the name of Tea Estate. During their first confrontation with the Thakurs gang, one of the gang members reveals that Nanaji’s real name is Daaku Maharaj. Who is Daaku Maharaj? What is Daaku Maharaj’s relationship with Baby Vaishnavi? What is the enmity between the Daaku Maharaj and Thakur brothers? Forms the rest of the story.
Performances:
Nandamuri Balakrishna delivered a subtle and impactful performance yet again right after ‘Bhagavanth Kesari’. His energy during the confrontation sequences with multiple antagonist characters & his energy during action sequences deserve appreciation. He looked good in the role of Nanaji and civil engineer Seetharam as well as ‘Daaku Maharaj’.
Pragya Jaiswal & Shraddha Srinath got limited but crucial roles. Both the actresses made their presence felt. The little girl who played the role of ‘Baby Vaishnavi’ delivered a good & confident performance. Ravi Kishan as Thrimurthulu Naidu did his role well and looked menacing.
Bobby Deol as the main antagonist and the younger brother in deadly Thakur’s family got a very good entry sequence. He did his part well in a not-so-well-written role. Shine Tom Chacko, Makarand Deshpande, VTV Ganesh, etc., the film had many notable actors. All of them made their presence felt but most of these characters were not written well.
Technicalities:
The cinematography by Vijay Kartik Kannan is undoubtedly the best thing that happened to the film. His visuals throughout the film are slick, stylish and very refreshing. Daaku Maharaaj is without a doubt one of the best Balakrishna film to date in terms of visuals. Especially, the visuals during the pre-interval sequence are top-notch. After the cinematography, the second-best thing that happened in the film was Thaman’s background score. His background score elevated and enhanced many sequences to the next level in the film. The ‘Chinni Chinni’ song is pleasant to hear and looks very good on screen. There are three other songs in the film including a mass number & two montage songs but none of these three songs leave any lasting impact.
Dialogues by Nandu Savirigana & Bhanu Bogavarapu are largely written keeping Balakrishna’s image in mind and are aimed to please the fans of Balakrishna & mass audience. There are quite a few dialogues in the film which are likely to draw whistles & cheers from the fans in theatres. Editing by Ruben & Niranjan Devaramane is a mixed bag. Their work is slick at places and would have been better at places. Especially, the editing during pre-climax and climax episodes would have been better.
Production values by Sithara Entertainments are very good as usual. Producer, Naga Vamsi and team spent enough money to give the film a very stylish and grand look. Kudos to the producers for hiring notable actors across multiple film industries even for small & not so significant roles. Bobby, the director took a routine script and mixed enough commercial elements to make the film a decent commercial entertainer. Let’s talk more about his work in the analysis section.
Positives:
- Balakrishna’s Subtle & Yet Impactful Performance
- Excellent Visuals
- Superb Background Score
- A Couple of Action Sequences
- Fans & Mass Audience Friendly Dialogues
- Pre-Interval Sequence
Negatives:
- Routine Storyline
- Predictable Screenplay
- Dragged Out Pre-Climax & Climax
- ‘Dabidi Dibidi’ Song Choreography
Analysis:
Kamal Hassan’s Vikram & Rajinikanth’s Jailer are now textbook references for any filmmaker who wants to make a film with a senior star hero in India across the film industry. The one thing that filmmakers have to keep in mind is that both Vikram and Jailer became a phenomenon for their innovative screenplay but not ‘Just’ because of their stylish presentation. The slick and stylish visuals along with terrific music only enhanced the impact of those films to another level but are not the ‘Only’ reasons for their phenomenal success.
For Daaku Maharaj, the director, Bobby, selected a very routine story and wrote a predictable screenplay around it but made sure to include enough adrenaline-pumping moments at regular intervals. The pre-interval sequence and transformation sequence of Seetharam into Daaku Maharaaj stands out. Both these sequences along with the dialogues used for the lead character will be liked immensely by the fans and mass audience.
The cinematography by Vijay Kartik Kannan & background score by Thaman are undoubtedly the major highlights of the film. However, the impact of cinematography and background score was brought down by routine execution. Barring an interesting twist related to the character, Baby Vaishnavi, right from the opening sequence to the climax, the film runs on a very predictable note. Especially, the last thirty minutes of the film would have been better with better writing for Bobby Deol’s character. Also, the choreography in the ‘Dabidi Dibidi’ song should have been better.
Overall, Daaku Maharaaj is a decent commercial entertainer and it can be watched easily once in theatres for Balakrishna’s subtle & yet impactful performance, slick & stylish visuals, Thaman’s background score and a few very well-executed sequences. With a bit of extra care in writing, this film would have become a memorable film in Nandamuri Balakrishna’s career.
Daaku Maharaaj – Stylish Maharaaj
Rating: 2.75/5
Related
Tags Daaku Maharaaj Daaku Maharaaj Review
Entertainment
Column: For Angelenos suffering fire fatigue, ace water drop videos are sweet revenge
Look, up in the sky. It’s a bird, it’s a plane, it’s a Super Scooper water drop!
The most memorable battle scenes exist in the pivot — the moment when all appears to be lost and then, out of nowhere, the cavalry arrives. The fishing boats at Dunkirk. Union reinforcements at Gettysburg. Or, fictionally, the Riders of Rohan sweeping down on the besieged city of Gondor.
For Angelenos, the cavalry has arrived in the form of water drop videos.
For days, images from the horrendous series of wildfires that continue to consume huge swaths of Los Angeles have been devastating. People forced to flee their cars on Sunset Boulevard; sparks whipped by 80-mph winds igniting entire streets; firefighters hastening evacuations and confronting literal walls of flame; the smoking shells of homes and businesses.
These images shocked, terrified and aggrieved us. It was difficult not to feel helpless, hopeless, as the fires grew in size and number.
Then, as the ferocious winds began to die down on Wednesday, firefighters were once again able to take to the air, scooping up water from the ocean and reservoirs and dumping it on the fires. TV journalists caught some of the maneuvers on camera. Citizens filmed others on their phones. Everyone began posting and sharing them on social media.
Whether in Altadena, West Hills or Hollywood, the videos — call them firefighting fancams — depict firefighting pilots angling planes over flames that appear uncontrollable and releasing, with remarkable precision, gallons of water that douse raging infernos in a matter of seconds.
It is impossible not to cheer. And at this moment, Los Angeles needs something to cheer about.
For days, fire has been our worst enemy. Randomly killing and arbitrarily destroying, it has taken on near-supernatural dimensions, appearing at times to be laughing as it sped through brush and buildings, forcing thousands to flee.
Watching it be squashed into nothing but smoke and steam is an exhilarating thing. Thought you were unstoppable? Take that. Thought you were too big to be beaten? Yippee-ki-yay, motherf—!
To a city reeling with loss, water drop videos are “Battle of Britain” and Snoopy beating the Red Baron. They’re rebel pilots taking down the Death Star, Bill Pullman’s speech in “Independence Day,” LeBron James hitting a final-second three. Gloria Gaynor’s “I Will Survive” and the Weather Girls’ “It’s Raining Men.”
The precision of the drops is astonishing, the impact heart-lifting, their moments of victory obvious and unquestionable.
The only thing missing are the job-done figures of the pilots walking away from their aircraft in vivid silhouette to a pounding bass accompaniment. For the simple reason that they are still hard at work.
But a grateful city sees them and has been offering viral shout-outs and admiration by posting water drop videos with the “Top Gun” soundtrack, sportscaster commentary and many, many applause emojis.
Two yellow Canadian Super Scoopers have been especially well-documented dropping water over the Palisades. One of them was grounded on Thursday after colliding with a civilian drone, and whoever was idiotic enough to illegally send one up during a firefight better hope the internet doesn’t find them before the feds do. These planes, helicopters and Super Scoopers are our heroes, providing support for the fearless, stretched-thin firefighters on the ground, helping to quench the Sunset fire before it claimed more homes and offering hope that at some point Los Angeles will cease to burn.
More important, the water drop videos have returned a feeling of control to the populace — and given us all something to root for.
Firefighters have been working nonstop since the Palisades fire exploded, and their efforts amid the smoke and flames have been lifesaving and heroic. It’s satisfying to watch the fruits of that hard work in the form of a fire all but extinguished before it claims yet another acre or snakes its way toward any more homes.
In fact, it’s the best thing any of us has seen in days.
-
Politics1 week ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics1 week ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics1 week ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health7 days ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World1 week ago
South Korea extends Boeing 737-800 inspections as Jeju Air wreckage lifted
-
Technology3 days ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
World1 week ago
Weather warnings as freezing temperatures hit United Kingdom
-
News1 week ago
Seeking to heal the country, Jimmy Carter pardoned men who evaded the Vietnam War draft