Entertainment
A rom-com veteran and a newbie director, Amanda Peet and Matthew Shear found ‘Fantasy Life’ together
Though Amanda Peet has worked steadily in television in recent years, the sincere and urbane comedy “Fantasy Life” marks her first role in a movie since 2015. Her performance as a woman struggling to get back in touch with her true self easily rates among the finest work of her career, alongside turns in such films as “Something’s Gotta Give” and “The Whole Nine Yards.”
She says she never particularly noticed her absence.
“I wasn’t thinking about it at all,” Peet, 54, says in a recent interview. “I think part of it is because the landscape has changed and it’s a little bit more of a mish-mosh [between movies and TV]. You’re getting a lot of nuanced, middle-aged women characters now in both. I’ve always just based everything on the writing for the last however long.”
In the new film, Peet plays Dianne, who stepped away from an acting career and now lives in Brooklyn with her self-involved musician husband (Alessandro Nivola). She finds herself emotionally entangled with Sam (Matthew Shear), the troubled young man they hire to help look after their three daughters. Warm and insightful, “Fantasy Life” is a low-key throwback to the talky city-dweller comedies of Nicole Holofcener and Noah Baumbach.
The film is the first as writer-director for Shear, best known as an actor in numerous Baumbach films including “Mistress America” and “Marriage Story” and for his role on the TNT series “The Alienist.” When it premiered at last year’s South by Southwest Film & TV Festival, “Fantasy Life” garnered a special jury prize for Peet’s performance and an audience award.
Peet says that from the first time she looked at the script, with its world of therapy sessions and chaotic family dinners, she knew she wanted to be a part of it.
“I almost did a spit-take,” Peet remembers of her first read. “I was like, ‘Oh, I wanna do this movie.’ Matthew’s sense of humor was very special and reminded of the kind of New York Jewish humor that I love. I wanted to do right by him.”
Matthew Shear and Amanda Peet in the movie “Fantasy Life.”
(Greenwich Entertainment)
Peet connected to the unease of not knowing how to recognize when one has become a has-been and staying open to whatever life still has to offer. That some of her deepest insecurities were being conveyed by someone like Shear, 41, seemed even more remarkable.
“I thought it was weird that the writer was a man writing this character — that’s true,” says Peet. “Those are things that I feel all the time, anxiety about whether it’s over, when it’s going to be over, should it be over? People who are in the creative world feel this precarity all the time.
“I’ve gotten much better in my old age, weirdly,” says Peet, “even though being an older actress is not easy, I feel more like I have such a better perspective about Hollywood and about the business and have more peace about it.“
Catching herself, she adds, “If my husband reads this, he’ll be like, ‘I’m sorry, what? What peace are you referring to?’”
“I’ve gotten much better in my old age, weirdly,” says Peet, “even though being an older actress is not easy, I feel more like I have such a better perspective about Hollywood and about the business and have more peace about it.“
(Justin Jun Lee / For The Times)
For our interview, Peet is in a hotel room in Los Angeles, in the middle of a press day for the second season of the Apple TV series “Your Friends & Neighbors,” while Shear is in the law office of his father-in-law on the Upper West Side of New York City, down the street from his apartment.
In conversation, Peet and Shear have an easy, playful chemistry even on a video call from opposite coasts, with Peet often finishing or clarifying Shear’s thoughts, while humbly deflecting credit whenever he wants to say she was responsible for something turning out as well as it did.
In the time since the movie premiered last year, Peet saw both her parents go through hospice care before dying and had her own battle with breast cancer. (She recently chronicled those events in an essay for the New Yorker.)
She describes her personal experiences with an insight, vulnerability and openness that is reminiscent of the raw emotions of Peet’s recent performances, which traffic in an understated, unassuming power.
Peet, who says her own health is currently “doing great,” recalls she was actually with Shear at a film festival in Miami earlier this year when she received news her mother’s condition had taken a turn for the worse and she had to leave to go to her.
“It’s been a part of my life for a while, what’s gone on with my mom,” she says. “It was harder when it was a secret. It’s been more calming to have people I love, like Matthew, who I can talk about work and get on with it, but they also know what’s going on.”
Shear says he first began his original screenplay with an image of a young man having a panic attack in the self-help section of a bookshop and grew the script from there. He had worked as a babysitter for Upper East Side families in his 20s and was able to draw on the ways he often felt himself inserted too deeply into the dynamics of the families he was working for.
When a friend from outside of show business suggested Peet, the idea just clicked. And then after she read the script and agreed to participate, also getting involved as a producer, things gained momentum, adding cast members like Nivola based on her involvement.
Sheer remembers a collaboration with Peet that extended to all aspects of the story — even to other characters. “Which is not the cliché about an actor who gives notes,” he says. “Amanda was so resilient on the journey.”
(Justin Jun Lee / For The Times)
“It was completely game-changing,” says Shear. “On paper, having Amanda attached to the movie just helped us get other people interested. But from our first conversation on Zoom, when I was blabbering and trying to make excuses for the fact that I was a first-time director, she just said to me, ‘You’re fine. Let’s talk about the script.’ And so that’s what we did. “
Peet brought a fresh perspective to the characters and story beyond just her own part.
“She had really sharp, thoughtful things to say about the script and helped me develop things that had nothing to do with her character,” Shear says. “Which is not the cliché about an actor who gives notes.
“And then it was just off to the races,” Shear says. “Amanda was so resilient on the journey. She just never lost confidence in the project.”
Peet did also have thoughts on how to expand upon her character’s growth and the nature of her burgeoning relationship with Sam. Though they do share a meaningful kiss, the stakes of their relationship remain more emotional than physical.
“One thing I can share,” says Shear with obvious relish, “was that one of Amanda’s first notes was that I had to turn up the sexual chemistry between us. I mean, you weren’t weird about it.“
“I was definitely weird about it,” Peet shoots back.
It was Peet who suggested a scene in which Shear’s Sam helps Peet’s character Dianne with creating a self-tape audition, a very specific indignity suffered by many working actors, as a way of seeing their growing affection for one another and how deeply he is falling for her.
“I remember thinking that it does have to be a love story of sorts,” says Peet. “And so it does have to go from like, ‘Oh, you’re the manny’ to waking up to each other as something other than this transactional thing with you babysitting. And just slowly turning up the dial.”
“Matthew’s sense of humor was very special and reminded of the kind of New York Jewish humor that I love,” says Peet. “I wanted to do right by him.”
(Justin Jun Lee / For The Times)
The film’s perspective on mental health, including Sam being open about his use of antidepressants, is quietly refreshing.
“I have a pet peeve about mental-health narratives in a lot of movies,” says Shear. “They’re usually either people in the mental hospital, hysterical suicide narratives or like the Joker not taking his meds. You don’t see what it’s like to be a normal-enough person and manage some very common mental-health issues and have some specifics about what that experience is like. I wanted to make something that had that.”
“I liked that the script was handling a more relatable kind of mental illness,” Peet says. “The script had a nonjudgmental view of that, but it’s not an issue movie. It’s not trying to get on any soapbox or anything like that. If you’re going to talk about hard issues, [it’s important] that you’re not constantly pointing to your own profundity as a writer, but instead making things funny and entertaining. I think that’s where I like to be.”
In another scene, Peet’s character is asked for an autograph by a young woman who mistakes her for the actor Lake Bell. This has actually happened to Peet “like a million times,” she admits, including once on a red carpet when photographers started shouting Bell’s name at her.
“It’s a weird thing because you’re like, what do I do here?” says Peet with a laugh. “What’s the least douchey way to get out of this?”
The scene originally had Peet’s character being recognized by someone who awkwardly can’t quite place her. When Peet told Shear she is often mistaken for Bell, they reconfigured the moment. (Peet and Bell have texted about the phenomenon and Peet only recently learned that sometimes Bell is mistaken for her.)
“Fantasy Life” has played a handful of other festivals, including L.A.’s AFI Fest last fall, since its 2025 premiere at SXSW. Shear is happy and relieved to see the film finally come to theaters, in part so that he can better focus on writing his next script.
Peet perks up at the mention of Shear’s new writing project.
“Is there a part for me in it?” she asks earnestly.
“We’ll talk later,” says Shear. Reading her face and realizing that he might have sounded dismissive, he adds, “It’s a conversation. A really creative conversation.”
Entertainment
When, unlike our upcoming 250th anniversary, a bicentennial mattered to orchestras
A century and a half ago, Richard Wagner was running out of cash as he was preparing to stage his four momentous nights of opera known as the “Ring Cycle” when he got a message from the Women’s Centennial Executive Committee in Philadelphia. It offered him a princely $5,000 (around $150,000 today) to write a triumphant 12-minute orchestral score to open the Centennial Exposition in Fairmont Park celebrating the 100th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.
On May 10, 1876, Theodore Thomas, perhaps America’s most famous conductor at the time (he would go on to head the New York Philharmonic and help found the Chicago Symphony), led the premiere of Wagner’s “Grosse Festmarsch” with a 150-member orchestra, its brass and percussion so impressive that the addition of cannon fire Wagner suggested was not needed. The crowd was said to number well over 100,000. President Ulysses S. Grant attended and invited Emperor Dom Pedro II of Brazil to join him along with members of Congress and Supreme Court justices for what remains a unique Declaration of Independence spectacle and debacle.
The “Centennial March,” as it came to be known, turned out to be dreck. Even Wagner, who carelessly tossed it off in a couple of weeks, said the best thing about the score was the fee, which he had demanded to be paid in gold. But what sounds like something AI might come up with if asked to write a pompous march in the style of Wagner began the American obsession with celebrating the Declaration of Independence, the words and deeds of our presidents, our very democracy with the assist of the symphony orchestra and opera.
One hundred years later, the country was awash with federal, state, city and philanthropic funding for a music-happy bicentennial of exceptional ambition. “With millions available in hand and more money to come,” Time Magazine wrote in 1975, “the Bicentennial is the biggest bonanza for the American composer since Hollywood discovered the musical.”
And so it was. The centerpiece was the National Endowment for the Arts Bicentennial Orchestra Commissioning Project. That funded America’s six top orchestras to each commission a major work that all six would play. In addition, the NEA offered further support to 34 American orchestras for dozens more new scores.
Everyone got into the act. The New York State Council of the Arts alone sponsored 68 commissions. Orchestras everywhere came up with striking projects. The Pittsburgh Symphony, for instance, premiered L.A. composer John LaMontaine’s opera/oratorio “Be Glad Then America” that featured the folk singer Odetta as the Muse of Liberty and enlisted ROTC students to reenact the Battle of Lexington overhead the orchestra.
The National Symphony commissioned symphonies from Roy Harris and William Schuman as well as Alan Hovhaness’ “Ode to Freedom,” a lovely short violin concerto written for Yehudi Menuhin. The list goes on.
We are obviously not seeing or hearing much like that in a semiquincentennial year when our government’s green gets the most attention for promoting algae. Even so, the NEA does indeed have an “America250” project (though it does little to publicize it, let alone fund it on the scale of 50 years ago) that is promoting more than 50 artworks. In music, they range from the Montgomery Symphony’s premiere in February of Nkeiru Okoye’s oratorio “A Time for Jubilee,” commemorating the 60th anniversary of the 1965 Selma-to-Montgomery civil rights marches, to a New West Symphony premiere last weekend of Michael Christie’s “A Ronald Reagan Portrait” at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum.
The major East Coast orchestras are paying some attention. The New York Philharmonic premiered David Lang’s luminous “the wealth of nations.” The National Symphony got the most attention in its attempt to commission Philip Glass’ “Lincoln” Symphony, which the composer pulled in opposition to an un-Lincoln-like presidential takeover of the Kennedy Center. Glass then gave the rights to the Boston Symphony for a July 5 first performance.
The National Symphony did pull off the premiere of Peter Boyer’s “American Mosaic,” and it was to the Altadena composer that Philadelphia, this time around, entrusted its Declaration of Independence commemoration. Boyer’s multimedia oratorio, “A Hundred Years On,” was given its premiere by the Philadelphia Orchestra last month at the orchestra’s outdoor summer home, the Mann Center.
Upcoming will be a few repeat performances. Next month, “the wealth of nations” lands at the Aspen Festival, as does the “Lincoln” Symphony at the Cabrillo festival (with an L.A. Phil performance next season). “American Mosaic,” of which the Pacific Symphony was a co-commissioner, had its West Coast premiere in Costa Mesa last month and was scheduled to be performed at the Hollywood Bowl by the National Symphony in August, but that has now been replaced by Dvorak’s commonplace “New World Symphony.”
None of this comes close to comparing with the attempted civic zest of 1976. The NEA made it a matter of admirable policy that commissioned new works get multiple performances. Yet despite several of these being substantial works by some of our most noted and venturesome composers, few bicentennial commissions have survived. Even odder is that many of the composers did not necessarily feel compelled to explore nationalist themes. For them, American liberty implied freedom to simply write the kind of music they cared about.
The six works for the six orchestras were David del Tredici’s irresistibly over-the-top “Final Alice” (Chicago Symphony), Elliott Carter’s arrestingly impenetrable-on-first-hearing “Symphony for Three Orchestras” (New York Philharmonic), John Cage’s irrepressibly come-what-may “Renga” (Boston Symphony), Morton Subotnick’s brilliant electronic-landscaped “Before the Butterfly” (Los Angeles Philharmonic), Leslie Bassett’s introspective “Echoes From an Invisible World” and Jacob Druckman’s abstract-modernist “Chiaroscuro” (Cleveland Orchestra).
No orchestra has brought back its commission over the last half century, and only Chicago and New York recorded their commissions. No recording at all exists of L.A.’s, although Subotnick’s inventive uses of electronic music with a standard symphony orchestra went on to have considerable influence. None of these works, it appears, are likely to be heard anywhere in America this year, with one sort-of exception.
An explanation for that may be that, while 1976 was a fraught time for America — the country was recovering from the Vietnam War, we had a president and vice president who were not elected, there was runaway inflation, etc. — the music of the time represented optimism. Many works around the country explored new electronic music technology. It was the year Glass wrote “Einstein on the Beach” and Steve Reich created “Music for 18 Musicians” — the composers’ first masterpieces — demonstrating that Minimalism mattered.
That sense of liberation is clearly behind Del Tredici’s “Final Alice,” an hourlong romp around the ending of “Alice in Wonderland” for superhuman soprano and orchestra. It is so obsessively and addictively wild that its tamest moments sound like Richard Strauss on LSD. It does have a cult following although performances are few and far between.
Cage’s score is an abstract work based on the Japanese form of collective poetry known as renga, in which each poet attempts to write a line that is as distant as possible in meaning from the preceding line. Cage translates that to an independence of instrumental parts. While “Renga” can be performed alone Cage further suggests it be played along with an actual bicentennial work he wrote separately, “Apartment House 1776.” That is what Boston and the other orchestras did.
Indeed, “Apartment House” got the lion’s share of bicentennial attention and ridicule. When Zubin Mehta conducted it at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, the L.A. Philharmonic did not take it seriously and many walked out on it.
The work features four vocal soloists who represent Native American, Sephardic, African American and Protestant religious traditions, along with instrumental music based on early American hymn tunes. Everything is cut up and put together through chance operations into what Cage called a Musicircus. Under the circumstances “Renga” was hardly noticed, although two decades later, “Renga” came into its own when Michael Tilson Thomas famously conducted it with the San Francisco Symphony and the surviving members of the Grateful Dead.
Still the idea that “Apartment House” need not stand alone, that our traditions and those of long-ago Japan belong together, represented for Cage a future for America. We need not act like a superpower, he noted, but merely be one nation, no more and no less, among many.
We are obviously not that nation. A half-century later, “Apartment House” tends to exist mainly in its own right. An excellent London new music ensemble calls itself Apartment House. Detroit Opera recently staged it with a 2026 need to give the singers the opportunity to select their own music rather than reflect on our heritage. If American music in 1976 represented a collective, inquisitive, inventive American spirit of discovery, the semiquincentennial in the age of social media has become more about the individual identity.
As a sign of how we think about ourselves, the Los Angeles Philharmonic begins its Hollywood Bowl season five days after the 4th with a program of American music conducted by Thomas Wilkins that opens with Valery Coleman’s “Fanfare for Uncommon Times,” which was written five years ago.
But for now, the work that stands out is Lang’s “the wealth of nations.” It balances harsh thoughts of how the promise of capitalism has failed society and how racism remains with music of stunning beauty and glory, to gently but forcefully show us, in our age of American dissatisfaction, the direction in which we might go to make us proud again. It needs many performances.
Movie Reviews
Sender
In Sender, writer-director Russell Goldman’s high-anxiety debut, the filmmaker expands on his 2022 short Return to Sender, in which Allison Tolman starred as a woman who receives packages she didn’t order. That may not sound like a premise that would result in a paranoid, darkly comedic thriller, much less a feature. But in extending his story from 18 minutes to just over 90, Goldman follows a maddening scenario involving an online retailer called Smirk, a fictionalized Amazon counterpart. More significantly, he captures the frenzied mindset of his protagonist, who grapples with staying sober and several other major life changes—all compounded by a layer of justifiable paranoia brought on by the endless packages. Goldman’s tweaky style and elusive scripting create a peculiar, out-of-whack presentation that destabilizes the viewer, firmly placing us in his main character’s perspective. However, by the end, the journey through this cine-manic headspace doesn’t add up to much, and the potential character study at the center feels somewhat lost in the mechanics of the conspiracy.
Britt Lower (AppleTV’s Severance) stars as Julia, who has just lost her job and moved into a rental home to get her life on track. She is backed financially by her overbearing sister Tatiana (Anna Baryshnikov), who occasionally comes nosing around to verify that Julia doesn’t backslide. And she doesn’t. Julia attends regular Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, where she meets the steely Whitney (Rhea Seehorn), who isn’t interested in being her sponsor. But at home, Julia receives a Smirk package with her brand of lipstick. The problem? She didn’t order it. She calls customer service, and the representative doesn’t help much before telling her, “Be sure to stay alert and aware.” Wait, what? Sender is loaded with nagging, unplaceable details like this. They’re often amusing, intriguing, and exasperating in the same moment. But these pieces don’t complete a whole picture, at least not a narratively satisfying one.
The Smirk packages, delivered by the outwardly helpful, nice-guy driver Charlie (David Dastmalchian), contain a random assortment of objects, from drum kits to protein powder. The squirrelly Julia, already coming apart at the seams from her recent drama, doesn’t know what to make of it. She’s convinced there’s some plot against her, perhaps by someone at Smirk. To what end, she doesn’t know. But Goldman gives us a glimpse of the long-term consequences of her ordeal in the prologue, which features Jamie Lee Curtis (also a producer) as Lisa, a woman in circumstances similar to Julia’s. Lisa’s response to receiving a box of soil with a broken shin pad (with “Can’t Can’t Can” scrawled on it) entails an attempt to suffocate herself with the bubble wrap, only to do far worse with a sharp edge of the shin pad. To show Lisa’s fate, Goldman’s imagery becomes twisted and surreal but also cryptic.
Sender’s disorienting mood is matched by a skewed formal presentation. Cinematographer Gemma Doll-Grossman’s wide-angle lenses and arch angles might feel at home in a Ken Russell or Terry Gilliam feature such as The Devils (1971) or 12 Monkeys (1996). Julia’s half-remembered drinking binges, accented by blurry close-ups, suggest she may have slept with any number of coworkers. She can’t remember, and it embarrasses her. Her rental is dressed in simple if shabby décor, which gives way to Julia’s erratic collage-like overhaul. Melisa Myers’ stuffed production design makes the most of heightened colors and banal, cluttered rooms that lend a normality to the bizarre, ever more disturbing predicament. Nathan Ruyle’s erratic music delivers what must be described as a soundscape rather than a traditional score, with collusive sound effects and tones driving our certainty that Julia is onto something. Along with Marco Rosas’ discordant editing, Goldman’s technical approach effectively reflects Julia’s fragmented, sleep-deprived mind. But his work as a writer hasn’t done enough to justify this level of technique.
After Julia makes a revelatory discovery that small cameras have been embedded in the products from those mysterious packages, the eventual explanation about what has been happening and why strains logic and underwhelms. It also raises even more unanswered questions. Although well-made and acted—Lower and Seehorn should be on track to movie stardom—Goldman’s script could have used another draft to better work through what unfolds. Sender doesn’t give us enough of its characters’ inner lives beyond the situation at hand, so Julia, Charlie, Tatiana, and Whitney feel like devices in a scenario rather than well-drawn human beings. Even so, Goldman fills his film with deeply broken people who try to gain control of their lives by controlling others, exposing and preying on their weaknesses. Despite the material’s potential resonance, Goldman’s style is overpowering. Still, his kernel of an idea and the way he explores it demonstrate his clear skill, and for much of Sender, its sheer oddball energy earns admiration.
Entertainment
Danny Glover reveals Alzheimer’s diagnosis, says family has his back
“Lethal Weapon” star Danny Glover has revealed he has been living with Alzheimer’s disease for years.
In an interview with NBC’s Lester Holt that aired on the “Today” show on Wednesday, the 79-year-old actor and activist opened up about living with the disease. According to People, he received his diagnosis in 2023, which was not long after he was awarded an honorary Oscar in 2022.
“I could live with it, in a sense,” Glover says of his condition, which has been affecting his movement, speech and memory. “I’m sure as it advances, things are going to be different and changing.”
A neurodegenerative disease, Alzheimer’s is a type of dementia that affects memory, thinking and behavior and worsens over time, according to the Alzheimer’s Assn. Holt reports that more than 7 million Americans over 65 are living with Alzheimer’s, with Black men suffering at a rate double the national average.
Glover and his family say the Hollywood icon is sharing his story now to “have ownership of his life” and to help remove the stigma around the disease.
“They’ve got my back,” Glover says of his family’s support.
Besides his portrayal of L.A. police Det. Roger Murtaugh in the “Lethal Weapon” film series, Glover is known for roles in movies including “Places in the Heart” (1984), “The Color Purple” (1985), “To Sleep With Anger” (1990), “Angels in the Outfield” (1994), “Dreamgirls” (2006) and “The Last Black Man in San Francisco” (2019). He’s also been a vocal advocate for social justice and humanitarian causes both in the U.S. and abroad.
He was the recipient of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences’ Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award in 2022.
“I don’t feel like it’s the end of my life,” he said in his interview with People about living with Alzheimer’s. “There’s work to do.”
-
Entertainment4 minutes agoWhen, unlike our upcoming 250th anniversary, a bicentennial mattered to orchestras
-
Lifestyle11 minutes agoDLTA’s former Ace Hotel is reborn as a ‘creative hub’ — and yes, you can still sleep there
-
Politics14 minutes agoTrump wants to show off D.C. for the Fourth. His construction is in the way
-
Science19 minutes agoBoyle Heights blaze choked L.A. with astronomical soot pollution
-
Sports26 minutes agoLakers announce summer league schedule, roster
-
World34 minutes ago
How the Entry-Exit System is becoming a nightmare for Europe's summer travellers
-
News59 minutes agoNewsom’s office responds to SCOTUS ruling on women’s sports as California faces ongoing trans athlete wave
-
Los Angeles, Ca2 hours agoFamily of boy, 8, killed by falling tree branch at Calabasas park to get $14.6M