Connect with us

Education

Nation’s First Religious Charter School Could Be Coming to Oklahoma

Published

on

Nation’s First Religious Charter School Could Be Coming to Oklahoma

An Oklahoma state schooling board might vote as early as Tuesday on whether or not to approve the nation’s first non secular constitution college, doubtlessly establishing a high-profile nationwide authorized battle over whether or not taxpayer cash can be utilized to immediately fund non secular colleges.

The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma Metropolis and the Diocese of Tulsa are in search of approval for the St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Digital Faculty, a web-based program supposed to serve college students in primarily rural areas throughout the state who in any other case have little alternative past their native public colleges.

The college’s organizers are in search of authorization as a constitution college, a sort of public college that’s paid for with taxpayer {dollars} however is independently run and managed. Although a small variety of constitution colleges could also be affiliated with non secular organizations, St. Isidore could be the primary to be explicitly non secular in its curriculum and operations.

The St. Isidore software has the assist of Oklahoma’s governor, Kevin Stitt, a Republican, who has argued that excluding non secular constitution colleges is a violation of the First Modification’s prohibition on non secular discrimination.

With conservative justices now dominating the Supreme Court docket, St. Isidore’s organizers hope the constitution college might be the following step in a broader motion to permit authorities cash to be spent on non secular colleges. About 7 p.c of public college college students in the US attend constitution colleges.

Advertisement

“We try to encourage the courts to take up this query and provides us a closing reply,” stated Brett Farley, government director of the Catholic Convention of Oklahoma, which represents the Catholic Church on coverage points and is behind the proposal.

Many Republican-led states are more and more pushing for households to have the choice to make use of taxpayer cash for personal schooling, together with using common college vouchers, which have been authorised in 5 states previously 12 months. And in a collection of current rulings, the Supreme Court docket, which now has a 6-to-3 conservative majority, has signaled its assist for the directing of taxpayer cash to non secular colleges amid its broader embrace of the position of faith in public life.

In key instances in 2020 and 2022, the Supreme Court docket dominated that Montana and Maine, respectively, couldn’t exclude non secular colleges from state packages that allowed dad and mom to make use of government-financed scholarship or tuition packages to ship their kids to non-public colleges. In each instances, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote that the rulings didn’t require states to assist non secular schooling, but when a state chooses to subsidize any non-public colleges, it could not discriminate in opposition to non secular ones.

The proposal in Oklahoma might open a brand new line of litigation, shifting the query from whether or not dad and mom can select to make use of state cash to pay for personal non secular colleges as to whether the federal government can immediately finance a non secular constitution college.

Lori Allen Walke, the senior minister of Mayflower Congregational UCC Church, a Protestant neighborhood in Oklahoma Metropolis, described the concept of non secular constitution colleges as a violation of non secular freedom, which “protects our proper to follow the faith of our alternative and to not follow a faith of anybody else’s alternative.”

Advertisement

Ms. Walke, who works with People United for Separation of Church and State, a authorized advocacy group, was alarmed by the St. Isidore’s software, which describes Catholic colleges as collaborating in “the evangelizing mission of the Church.”

“They’re being very clear about what they’re making an attempt to do there,” she stated.

Constitution colleges symbolize a hybrid — and rising — mannequin of schooling. Like common public colleges, they’re funded with taxpayer cash and don’t cost tuition. However in contrast to conventional colleges, they aren’t zoned to explicit neighborhoods, are independently managed and are sometimes designed for innovation and adaptability. For instance, they might have longer college days, or middle on a tutorial theme.

The variety of college students enrolled in constitution colleges in the US greater than doubled between 2009 and 2019, in keeping with federal knowledge. Oklahoma has about 60 constitution colleges, together with a number of digital colleges.

The nationwide growth of constitution colleges has at occasions been extremely contentious, as colleges pulled college students — and their funding — away from neighborhood public colleges. On the similar time, constitution colleges have usually been well-liked amongst Black and Latino dad and mom in search of a substitute for failing public colleges, and have been embraced by some Democrats as a substitute for taxpayer-funded vouchers supported by Republicans.

Advertisement

Nicole Stelle Garnett, a legislation professor on the College of Notre Dame who has argued for non secular constitution colleges and has suggested the St. Isidore organizers, stated that the “underlying query” was whether or not constitution colleges had been “state actors” or “non-public actors,” regardless of being publicly funded.

“Are they actually authorities brokers, or are they extra like a authorities contractor?” she requested, utilizing the instance of Lockheed Martin, a personal firm that contracts for the U.S. army.

If they’re non-public actors, there may be room for them to be expressly non secular, Ms. Garnett stated.

However the constitution college motion sees itself as squarely within the sphere of public schooling, stated Nina Rees, president and chief government of the Nationwide Alliance for Public Constitution Colleges. She famous that constitution colleges should comply with the identical necessities as common public colleges, reminiscent of hiring employees members and accepting college students no matter non secular background or sexual identification — protections she fears would go away if non secular charters had been to be authorised.

The authorized query — whether or not constitution colleges are “state actors” or “non-public actors” — is central to a different case, from North Carolina, which the Supreme Court docket is weighing whether or not to take up.

Advertisement

Ought to the query make its strategy to the Supreme Court docket, Preston Inexperienced, a professor on the College of Connecticut who research academic legislation, believes that the court docket’s conservative majority could be more likely to embrace constitution colleges as “non-public actors,” opening the door to non secular charters.

“I simply can’t see them saying no to this in the event that they get an opportunity,” he stated.

In its software, St. Isidore stated that it will be open to college students of all faiths or no religion. If authorised, the college, named for the patron saint of the web, would settle for an preliminary batch of 500 college students in kindergarten by twelfth grade, beginning no before the autumn of 2024.

“We’re taking what we’ve been doing in Catholic colleges for over a century in Oklahoma and placing that on-line, in order that we are able to carry this content material to the parents out within the rural areas,” stated Mr. Farley, of the Catholic Convention of Oklahoma, who argued that whereas the proposal represented an “innovation,” it was “by no means distinctive.”

“We do that in lots of walks of life,” he stated. “We’ve obtained Medicaid going to Catholic hospitals. We’ve obtained FEMA reduction funds going to Catholic Charities.”

Advertisement

When requested about admitting L.G.B.T.Q. college students or employees members, Mr. Farley stated that he couldn’t touch upon hypotheticals. He stated the college supposed to abide by state rules, whereas additionally sustaining its proper to function in keeping with its non secular beliefs.

Although approval of non secular constitution colleges would open the door to religions of every kind — Jewish and Muslim constitution colleges, for instance — Rachel Laser, president and chief government of People United for Separation of Church and State, stated she frightened that the Oklahoma case “clears a path for the federal government to favor the bulk faith.”

The nation as a complete has grown extra secular in current many years.

There are actually extra folks in the US who establish as religiously unaffiliated than establish as Catholic. In Oklahoma, Catholics make up simply 8 p.c of the inhabitants, lower than half the nationwide determine, in keeping with a 2014 survey by the Pew Analysis Middle.

The proposed Catholic constitution college has led to debate amongst prime Oklahoma Republicans. The state’s new lawyer normal this 12 months disagreed along with his predecessor that there was sufficient authorized precedent to assist a non secular constitution college — and Governor Stitt ended up weighing in with a strongly worded letter in assist of non secular constitution colleges and the St. Isidore software.

Advertisement

The Oklahoma Statewide Digital Constitution Faculty Board, which is contemplating the appliance, contains members appointed by the governor and leaders of the Republican-controlled State Legislature.

Charlie Savage contributed reporting

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Education

Video: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

Published

on

Video: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

new video loaded: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

transcript

transcript

Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

Police officers arrested 33 pro-Palestinian protesters and cleared a tent encampment on the campus of George Washingon University.

“The Metropolitan Police Department. If you are currently on George Washington University property, you are in violation of D.C. Code 22-3302, unlawful entry on property.” “Back up, dude, back up. You’re going to get locked up tonight — back up.” “Free, free Palestine.” “What the [expletive] are you doing?” [expletives] “I can’t stop — [expletives].”

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Israel-Hamas War

Continue Reading

Education

How Counterprotesters at U.C.L.A. Provoked Violence, Unchecked for Hours

Published

on

How Counterprotesters at U.C.L.A. Provoked Violence, Unchecked for Hours

A satellite image of the UCLA campus.

On Tuesday night, violence erupted at an encampment that pro-Palestinian protesters had set up on April 25.

The image is annotated to show the extent of the pro-Palestinian encampment, which takes up the width of the plaza between Powell Library and Royce Hall.

Advertisement

The clashes began after counterprotesters tried to dismantle the encampment’s barricade. Pro-Palestinian protesters rushed to rebuild it, and violence ensued.

Arrows denote pro-Israeli counterprotesters moving towards the barricade at the edge of the encampment. Arrows show pro-Palestinian counterprotesters moving up against the same barricade.

Police arrived hours later, but they did not intervene immediately.

Advertisement

An arrow denotes police arriving from the same direction as the counterprotesters and moving towards the barricade.

A New York Times examination of more than 100 videos from clashes at the University of California, Los Angeles, found that violence ebbed and flowed for nearly five hours, mostly with little or no police intervention. The violence had been instigated by dozens of people who are seen in videos counterprotesting the encampment.

Advertisement

The videos showed counterprotesters attacking students in the pro-Palestinian encampment for several hours, including beating them with sticks, using chemical sprays and launching fireworks as weapons. As of Friday, no arrests had been made in connection with the attack.

To build a timeline of the events that night, The Times analyzed two livestreams, along with social media videos captured by journalists and witnesses.

The melee began when a group of counterprotesters started tearing away metal barriers that had been in place to cordon off pro-Palestinian protesters. Hours earlier, U.C.L.A. officials had declared the encampment illegal.

Security personnel hired by the university are seen in yellow vests standing to the side throughout the incident. A university spokesperson declined to comment on the security staff’s response.

Mel Buer/The Real News Network

Advertisement

It is not clear how the counterprotest was organized or what allegiances people committing the violence had. The videos show many of the counterprotesters were wearing pro-Israel slogans on their clothing. Some counterprotesters blared music, including Israel’s national anthem, a Hebrew children’s song and “Harbu Darbu,” an Israeli song about the Israel Defense Forces’ campaign in Gaza.

As counterprotesters tossed away metal barricades, one of them was seen trying to strike a person near the encampment, and another threw a piece of wood into it — some of the first signs of violence.

Attacks on the encampment continued for nearly three hours before police arrived.

Counterprotesters shot fireworks toward the encampment at least six times, according to videos analyzed by The Times. One of them went off inside, causing protesters to scream. Another exploded at the edge of the encampment. One was thrown in the direction of a group of protesters who were carrying an injured person out of the encampment.

Advertisement

Mel Buer/The Real News Network

Some counterprotesters sprayed chemicals both into the encampment and directly at people’s faces.

Sean Beckner-Carmitchel via Reuters

Advertisement

At times, counterprotesters swarmed individuals — sometimes a group descended on a single person. They could be seen punching, kicking and attacking people with makeshift weapons, including sticks, traffic cones and wooden boards.

StringersHub via Associated Press, Sergio Olmos/Calmatters

In one video, protesters sheltering inside the encampment can be heard yelling, “Do not engage! Hold the line!”

In some instances, protesters in the encampment are seen fighting back, using chemical spray on counterprotesters trying to tear down barricades or swiping at them with sticks.

Advertisement

Except for a brief attempt to capture a loudspeaker used by counterprotesters, and water bottles being tossed out of the encampment, none of the videos analyzed by The Times show any clear instance of encampment protesters initiating confrontations with counterprotesters beyond defending the barricades.

Shortly before 1 a.m. — more than two hours after the violence erupted — a spokesperson with the mayor’s office posted a statement that said U.C.L.A officials had called the Los Angeles Police Department for help and they were responding “immediately.”

Officers from a separate law enforcement agency — the California Highway Patrol — began assembling nearby, at about 1:45 a.m. Riot police with the L.A.P.D. joined them a few minutes later. Counterprotesters applauded their arrival, chanting “U.S.A., U.S.A., U.S.A.!”

Just four minutes after the officers arrived, counterprotesters attacked a man standing dozens of feet from the officers.

Twenty minutes after police arrive, a video shows a counterprotester spraying a chemical toward the encampment during a scuffle over a metal barricade. Another counterprotester can be seen punching someone in the head near the encampment after swinging a plank at barricades.

Advertisement

Fifteen minutes later, while those in the encampment chanted “Free, free Palestine,” counterprotesters organized a rush toward the barricades. During the rush, a counterprotester pulls away a metal barricade from a woman, yelling “You stand no chance, old lady.”

Throughout the intermittent violence, officers were captured on video standing about 300 feet away from the area for roughly an hour, without stepping in.

It was not until 2:42 a.m. that officers began to move toward the encampment, after which counterprotesters dispersed and the night’s violence between the two camps mostly subsided.

The L.A.P.D. and the California Highway Patrol did not answer questions from The Times about their responses on Tuesday night, deferring to U.C.L.A.

While declining to answer specific questions, a university spokesperson provided a statement to The Times from Mary Osako, U.C.L.A.’s vice chancellor of strategic communications: “We are carefully examining our security processes from that night and are grateful to U.C. President Michael Drake for also calling for an investigation. We are grateful that the fire department and medical personnel were on the scene that night.”

Advertisement

L.A.P.D. officers were seen putting on protective gear and walking toward the barricade around 2:50 a.m. They stood in between the encampment and the counterprotest group, and the counterprotesters began dispersing.

While police continued to stand outside the encampment, a video filmed at 3:32 a.m. shows a man who was walking away from the scene being attacked by a counterprotester, then dragged and pummeled by others. An editor at the U.C.L.A. student newspaper, the Daily Bruin, told The Times the man was a journalist at the paper, and that they were walking with other student journalists who had been covering the violence. The editor said she had also been punched and sprayed in the eyes with a chemical.

On Wednesday, U.C.L.A.’s chancellor, Gene Block, issued a statement calling the actions by “instigators” who attacked the encampment unacceptable. A spokesperson for California Gov. Gavin Newsom criticized campus law enforcement’s delayed response and said it demands answers.

Los Angeles Jewish and Muslim organizations also condemned the attacks. Hussam Ayloush, the director of the Greater Los Angeles Area office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, called on the California attorney general to investigate the lack of police response. The Jewish Federation Los Angeles blamed U.C.L.A. officials for creating an unsafe environment over months and said the officials had “been systemically slow to respond when law enforcement is desperately needed.”

Fifteen people were reportedly injured in the attack, according to a letter sent by the president of the University of California system to the board of regents.

Advertisement

The night after the attack began, law enforcement warned pro-Palestinian demonstrators to leave the encampment or be arrested. By early Thursday morning, police had dismantled the encampment and arrested more than 200 people from the encampment.

Continue Reading

Education

Video: President Biden Addresses Campus Protests

Published

on

Video: President Biden Addresses Campus Protests

new video loaded: President Biden Addresses Campus Protests

transcript

transcript

President Biden Addresses Campus Protests

President Biden defended the right of demonstrators to protest peacefully, but condemned the “chaos” that has prevailed at many colleges nationwide.

Violent protest is not protected. Peaceful protest is. It’s against the law when violence occurs. Destroying property is not a peaceful protest. It’s against the law. Vandalism, trespassing, breaking windows, shutting down campuses, forcing the cancellation of classes and graduations — none of this is a peaceful protest. Threatening people, intimidating people, instilling fear in people is not peaceful protest. It’s against the law. Dissent is essential to democracy, but dissent must never lead to disorder or to denying the rights of others, so students can finish the semester and their college education. There’s the right to protest, but not the right to cause chaos. People have the right to get an education, the right to get a degree, the right to walk across the campus safely without fear of being attacked. But let’s be clear about this as well. There should be no place on any campus — no place in America — for antisemitism or threats of violence against Jewish students. There is no place for hate speech or violence of any kind, whether it’s antisemitism, Islamophobia or discrimination against Arab Americans or Palestinian Americans. It’s simply wrong. There’s no place for racism in America.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Politics

Continue Reading

Trending