Connect with us

Culture

The road to Ford’s F1 return with Red Bull: ‘I’m a great believer in fate’

Published

on

The road to Ford’s F1 return with Red Bull: ‘I’m a great believer in fate’

This article is part of our Origin Stories series, an inside look at the backstories of the clubs, drivers, and people fueling the sport.


En route to Brazil, near the end of the 2022 season, Red Bull Formula One boss Christian Horner stopped off in the United States for a meeting that could be decisive for his team’s future.

Months earlier, talks to enter a partnership with Porsche had broken down. Red Bull was eager to find a new manufacturer partner to support its in-house engine program, Red Bull Powertrains, formed after Honda quit F1 at the end of 2021.

Horner sat in an office at Ford Motor Company’s headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan, for an important meeting. Discussions about an F1 project started with Mark Rushbrook, Ford’s motorsport boss, and appeared to be going well.

But this meeting also involved Bill Ford, the company chairman and great-grandson of its legendary founder, Henry Ford, and Jim Farley, its president and CEO. The stakes were that much higher.

Advertisement

Horner’s positive feeling was quickly confirmed. “I thought we were in good shape when Jim walked into the meeting in a Sergio Pérez cap,” he recalled in July this year. “(I thought) ‘OK, we’re looking pretty good here!’”

It paved the way for Red Bull and Ford to agree on a partnership that will start in 2026 when F1’s new engine regulations are introduced. The link-up will bring the American automotive giant back to the F1 grid after more than two decades away. Ford’s most recent involvement ended in 2004 when it sold its Jaguar team to Red Bull.

While 2026 is a couple of years away, the Red Bull Ford partnership is already working at pace, conscious of the significance of the new regulations and the scale of the project.

“Together with Ford, we have to succeed,” Horner said. “We can’t afford for this project not to succeed.”


Red Bull and Honda’s successful partnership ends after the 2025 season. (Mark Thompson / Getty Images)

Controlling its destiny

In October 2020, just 18 months after its first race as Red Bull’s engine partner, Honda announced that it would exit F1 at the end of the 2021 season.

Advertisement

The shock decision, taken to cut costs and shift toward electrification — and ultimately reversed three years later, when it signed a deal with Aston Martin starting in 2026 — left Red Bull at a crossroads. Trying to buy engines from its primary F1 rivals Ferrari or Mercedes would be awkward. Going back to previous partner Renault was not a viable move. Renault’s underperformance since 2014 sparked very public frustration from Red Bull.

So why not go it alone? Red Bull started exploring what it would take to make its own F1 engine. It would be a significant investment, but one that would give Red Bull control over its destiny instead of relying on a partner that, as Honda proved, could dip out of F1 at any moment.

“In the end, we decided that, actually, if we’re going to do it, we may as well do the whole thing,” Horner said.

While successful as an F1 team, Red Bull did not have the technical might or the existing knowledge base of its manufacturer rivals for making power units. Horner said it quickly became clear it was better strategically to partner with a car maker. “Because as an independent manufacturer, you miss out on the advantages that a Ferrari or a Mercedes or a Honda — who changed their mind — technically have.”

Porsche looked set to be Red Bull’s F1 partner of choice. The Volkswagen Group wanted to get the brand back into F1 by 2026, to enhance its rich motorsport heritage, including dominating F1 with McLaren in the mid-1980s. The talks approached a successful conclusion in the summer of 2022, but negotiations eventually broke down. Porsche had sought an ownership stake which Horner said Red Bull concluded “wasn’t the right route for the business.”

Advertisement

It left Red Bull back at square one, looking for a manufacturer partner. Then Horner, who said he is “a great believer in fate,” received an email from Rushbrook that changed everything. Ford wanted to come back to F1. Would Red Bull be interested in a conversation?

“It happened very, very quickly,” Horner said.


Jim Farley, CEO of Ford, Mark Rushbrook of Ford and Max Verstappen talk in the garage prior to the 2023 Miami GP. (Mark Thompson / Getty Images)

Right place, right time

F1’s appeal to manufacturers grew significantly for 2026. Its proposed power unit regulations aligned closer with global automotive trends through a greater focus on electrification and fully sustainable fuels. At the same time, the off-track boom in popularity made its marketing appeal greater than ever.

Mercedes and Ferrari were already on the grid. Honda planned to return with Aston Martin. Audi had announced a 2026 entry. Now, Ford also wanted to join the fray.

“When we saw what was happening in Formula One with the technical regulations, it was very aligned, giving us more of an opportunity to contribute and learn the innovation and tech transfer part of it,” Rushbrook said. “But certainly also the health of the sport, and the popularity globally and the diversity of the audience.”

Advertisement

It then became a question of how Ford would enter F1. It explored multiple options, including buying a team, as Audi did with Sauber, or developing a power unit division from scratch. Both would be very costly undertakings, and Ford’s previous struggles with owning Jaguar proved running an F1 operation had not been its strong suit. In five seasons, the team scored just two podium finishes before being sold to Red Bull at the end of 2004.

Nor did buying a team fit with Ford’s wider motorsport model.

“Yes, we’re in motorsports, but nowhere do we own or run the team,” Rushbrook said. “We always go with partners, whether it’s Dick Johnson Racing in Australia (Supercars), or Penske in NASCAR, or M-Sport in rally.”

The timing worked perfectly to commence talks with Red Bull. Upon hearing the Porsche deal was off, Rushbrook got a hold of Horner’s email address and sent an email mid-flight, setting the ball rolling toward a swift conclusion.

“We’d been through six months of discussion with Porsche. It didn’t play out,” Horner said. “I think from start to finish, it was literally 12 weeks to signing a contract (with Ford). The initial discussions with Mark, then Jim Farley and Bill Ford, basically there was a decision by the end of ’22 that this was the route forward.”

Advertisement

The new partnership, announced in February 2023 to coincide with Red Bull’s season launch, confirmed Ford’s commitment through the next cycle of power unit regulations, from 2026 to 2030.

The deal works for both sides. Ford returns to F1 after 22 years with a championship-winning team, benefitting from the technology transfer — F1 serves as a high-speed laboratory for future road car innovations — as well as the marketing might of F1, without the liability of a team or a total engine program. It will also be the only American manufacturer on the F1 grid in a boom period for the sport in the United States.

And in Ford, Red Bull would get a partner with the expertise and resources that could help its nascent engine program try to compete with the experience of Ferrari and Mercedes from the outset.

Christian Horner and Jim Farley

Red Bull’s Christian Horner and Ford’s Jim Farley speak at Red Bull’s 2023 season launch in New York. (Arturo Holmes / Getty Images for Oracle Red Bull Racing)

A partnership already in motion

The first Red Bull Ford powertrain won’t race in F1 for another 18 months, but that has not stopped both sides from accelerating the partnership.

The importance of the 2026 regulation overhaul, when the integration of the power unit into the car should have a huge impact on a team’s performance, means it is already a priority for F1’s manufacturers.

Advertisement

“Whilst ’26, probably to the fans, seems quite a way away, you’re going to be locking in decisions for your race engines within the next months,” Horner said. “For the design teams, it’s literally tomorrow.”

Red Bull Powertrains has been growing rapidly as a result, with a significant recruitment drive, including a number of personnel from rival F1 engine programs, and the construction of two new buildings on its Milton Keynes campus fully dedicated to the 2026 program. The initial Red Bull Ford power unit supply will be for the two Red Bull teams, Red Bull and RB, but the facility is built with the capability to provide a further two customer teams. Besides Ferrari, Red Bull is the only other team in F1 with its team and engine operation on the same site.

Although there isn’t any Ford branding on the Red Bull F1 car — the current engines are still Honda intellectual property, and a technical agreement remains in place until the end of 2025 — their marketing efforts are already underway. Max Verstappen and Sergio Pérez have already taken part in demonstration events driving Ford cars. Pérez took the Ford Red Bull SuperVan, an all-electric van producing the equivalent of over 1,400 bhp, up the famous Goodwood hill climb in July. Ford also supports one of Red Bull’s entries to F1 Academy, the all-women support series, and named Chloe Chambers as its driver for 2025 earlier this month. Even the road cars used by Red Bull team members on race weekends are Fords.

The true success of Red Bull and Ford’s partnership will be defined come 2026, when an early engine advantage could be crucial. Mercedes proved that at the start of the V6 hybrid power unit era in 2014 when it went on a record eight-season streak of constructors’ titles and dominated that era of F1.

Horner said he had “no illusions” that Red Bull and Ford will face anything but a big challenge for 2026, noting the “decades of experience” the likes of Mercedes and Ferrari have with their F1 engine projects.

Advertisement

“We’ve got three years of experience,” Horner said. “But we’ve got a huge amount of passion, we’ve got some great people, we’ve got great facilities, we’ve got great partners, and we’ve got all the attitude that has served us so well in the 120 race wins that we’ve achieved so far.

“It’ll be so rewarding when we add to that number with an engine that’s been designed, built, and manufactured here in Milton Keynes.”

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Lando Norris talks F1 title bid: Pressure, mistakes and Max Verstappen’s friendship

(Top photo of Christian Horner: Seth Wenig / AP)

Advertisement

Culture

I Think This Poem Is Kind of Into You

Published

on

I Think This Poem Is Kind of Into You

Advertisement

A famous poet once observed that it is difficult to get the news from poems. The weather is a different story. April showers, summer sunshine and — maybe especially — the chill of winter provide an endless supply of moods and metaphors. Poets like to practice a double meteorology, looking out at the water and up at the sky for evidence of interior conditions of feeling.

The inner and outer forecasts don’t always match up. This short poem by Louise Glück starts out cold and stays that way for most of its 11 lines.

And then it bursts into flame.

Advertisement

“Early December in Croton-on-Hudson” comes from Glück’s debut collection, “Firstborn,” which was published in 1968. She wrote the poems in it between the ages of 18 and 23, but they bear many of the hallmarks of her mature style, including an approach to personal matters — sex, love, illness, family life — that is at once uncompromising and elusive. She doesn’t flinch. She also doesn’t explain.

Here, for example, Glück assembles fragments of experience that imply — but also obscure — a larger narrative. It’s almost as if a short story, or even a novel, had been smashed like a glass Christmas ornament, leaving the reader to infer the sphere from the shards.

Advertisement

We know there was a couple with a flat tire, and that a year later at least one of them still has feelings for the other. It’s hard not to wonder if they’re still together, or where they were going with those Christmas presents.

To some extent, those questions can be addressed with the help of biographical clues. The version of “Early December in Croton-on-Hudson” that appeared in The Atlantic in 1967 was dedicated to Charles Hertz, a Columbia University graduate student who was Glück’s first husband. They divorced a few years later. Glück, who died in 2023, was never shy about putting her life into her work.

Advertisement

Louise Glück in 1975.

Gerard Malanga

Advertisement

But the poem we are reading now is not just the record of a passion that has long since cooled. More than 50 years after “Firstborn,” on the occasion of receiving the Nobel Prize for literature, Glück celebrated the “intimate, seductive, often furtive or clandestine” relations between poets and their readers. Recalling her childhood discovery of William Blake and Emily Dickinson, she declared her lifelong ardor for “poems to which the listener or reader makes an essential contribution, as recipient of a confidence or an outcry, sometimes as co-conspirator.”

That’s the kind of poem she wrote.

Advertisement

“Confidence” can have two meanings, both of which apply to “Early December in Croton-on-Hudson.” Reading it, you are privy to a secret, something meant for your ears only. You are also in the presence of an assertive, self-possessed voice.

Where there is power, there’s also risk. To give voice to desire — to whisper or cry “I want you” — is to issue a challenge and admit vulnerability. It’s a declaration of conquest and a promise of surrender.

What happens next? That’s up to you.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Culture

Can You Identify Where the Winter Scenes in These Novels Took Place?

Published

on

Can You Identify Where the Winter Scenes in These Novels Took Place?

Cold weather can serve as a plot point or emphasize the mood of a scene, and this week’s literary geography quiz highlights the locations of recent novels that work winter conditions right into the story. Even if you aren’t familiar with the book, the questions offer an additional hint about the setting. To play, just make your selection in the multiple-choice list and the correct answer will be revealed. At the end of the quiz, you’ll find links to the books if you’d like to do further reading.

Continue Reading

Culture

From NYT’s 10 Best Books of 2025: A.O. Scott on Kiran Desai’s New Novel

Published

on

From NYT’s 10 Best Books of 2025: A.O. Scott on Kiran Desai’s New Novel

Inge Morath/Magnum Photos

Advertisement

Advertisement

When a writer is praised for having a sense of place, it usually means one specific place — a postage stamp of familiar ground rendered in loving, knowing detail. But Kiran Desai, in her latest novel, “The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny,” has a sense of places.

This 670-page book, about the star-crossed lovers of the title and several dozen of their friends, relatives, exes and servants (there’s a chart in the front to help you keep track), does anything but stay put. If “The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny” were an old-fashioned steamer trunk, it would be papered with shipping labels: from Allahabad (now known as Prayagraj), Goa and Delhi; from Queens, Kansas and Vermont; from Mexico City and, perhaps most delightfully, from Venice.

There, in Marco Polo’s hometown, the titular travelers alight for two chapters, enduring one of several crises in their passionate, complicated, on-again, off-again relationship. One of Venice’s nicknames is La Serenissima — “the most serene” — but in Desai’s hands it’s the opposite: a gloriously hectic backdrop for Sonia and Sunny’s romantic confusion.

Advertisement

Their first impressions fill a nearly page-long paragraph. Here’s how it begins.

Sonia is a (struggling) fiction writer. Sunny is a (struggling) journalist. It’s notable that, of the two of them, it is she who is better able to perceive the immediate reality of things, while he tends to read facts through screens of theory and ideology, finding sociological meaning in everyday occurrences. He isn’t exactly wrong, and Desai is hardly oblivious to the larger narratives that shape the fates of Sunny, Sonia and their families — including the economic and political changes affecting young Indians of their generation.

Advertisement

But “The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny” is about more than that. It’s a defense of the very idea of more, and thus a rebuke to the austerity that defines so much recent literary fiction. Many of Desai’s peers favor careful, restricted third-person narration, or else a measured, low-affect “I.” The bookstores are full of skinny novels about the emotional and psychological thinness of contemporary life. This book is an antidote: thick, sloppy, fleshy, all over the place.

It also takes exception to the postmodern dogma that we only know reality through representations of it, through pre-existing concepts of the kind to which intellectuals like Sunny are attached. The point of fiction is to assert that the world is true, and to remind us that it is vast, strange and astonishing.

Advertisement

See the full list of the 10 Best Books of 2025 here.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending