Connect with us

Culture

Alexi Lalas and Stu Holden – bold, opinionated but never just 'fine'

Published

on

Alexi Lalas and Stu Holden – bold, opinionated but never just 'fine'

“I’ve worked with Alexi for 10 years,” says Stu Holden, Fox Sports analyst and former United States men’s national team midfielder. “He’s one of the first people that I am asked about. They say: ‘What’s that guy like off-camera?’.”

It is a thought many may share while watching Alexi Lalas, the formerly goatee-bearded U.S. central defender who rose to prominence at the 1994 World Cup, now best known for his tinderbox contributions on American soccer television.

He comes with a significant soccer pedigree, recording almost a century of caps for his country and playing in Italy’s Serie A and Major League Soccer. A signpost of his influencer status came in 2021 when the world governing body, FIFA, undertook a feasibility study as part of a failed attempt to introduce a biennial World Cup. Lalas was invited along to a seminar hosted by former Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger as part of a cohort that included Brazilians Ronaldo and Roberto Carlos, former Denmark and Manchester United goalkeeper Peter Schmeichel and Australia’s Tim Cahill.

On U.S. television, Lalas, 54, a studio analyst for Fox during the European Championship and Copa America this summer, is bold and direct in his opinions. This week, he has already compared the England national team to the Dallas Cowboys, saying the English are as “insufferable as they are talented”.

Advertisement

And over 40 minutes in a Manhattan coffee shop, he is no different. Topics cut across the future of Gregg Berhalter as coach of the U.S. men’s national team (“We’re letting the players off the hook”, he insists), or his “video game” approach to social media. This is a dose of pure, undiluted Lalas. Sitting beside him, ordering a piccolo coffee (“Don’t encourage him,” Lalas says, when I ask what a piccolo involves), is the more reserved Holden, 38, who also packs a punch in his analysis.

I tell Lalas that some people took a deep breath when I mentioned I was due to interview him. He smiles. First and foremost, Lalas says he sees his studio role as “hopefully having an interesting and informative take, and doing it in an entertaining way”.

He stirs. “But I’m in the entertainment business. I am a performer. When you say that, sometimes people cringe. By no means am I saying that I can’t be authentic and genuine. But I recognise the way I say something is as important as what I say.

“When I go on TV, I put on a costume and when that red light goes on, I don’t want people changing the channel. I don’t care if you like me or you don’t. I am as human as I possibly can be with the recognition that, on television, things have to be bigger and bolder.”

Holden interjects: “He’s one of my good friends. People ask me: ‘Does he believe everything he says?’. And I say, ‘We have the same conversations at the bar that we have on air’.

Advertisement

“I’ve learned from Alexi that you have to be interesting in this business to have longevity. Whether that’s the role that he plays, still authentic to who he is and the opinions he carries — but maybe a little bit of juice on there to fire it up — you never want to be in between. You never want to be in the middle of it, where people are just like, ‘Ah, that guy’s fine’. So be on one side, be bold, don’t care about opinions, but be authentic to who you are. And that’s who he is — on and off camera.”

Holden made 25 appearances for the USMNT but a career that included Premier League spells at Sunderland and Bolton Wanderers was cruelly cut short by injury. He and Lalas apply diligence to their output, often meeting with coaches, players or front-office staff the day before the match to explain to viewers what the team is seeking to achieve.


Lalas on the US team at 1994 home World Cup (Photo: Michael Kunkel/Bongarts/Getty Images)

As time passes, they are more distant from a modern locker room but Holden says it’s important “to take people inside the tent”.

“It’s not as common in England,” he adds, “but it is ingrained in American sports television where they will go to NFL practice, sit with the coaches, get exclusive breakdowns of play. Europeans have a hard time understanding this when they come here. Patrick Vieira (when he was manager of New York City FC) didn’t want to meet with us. Frank de Boer (at Atlanta United), too. Often the European or South American coaches are like, ‘Why are you guys in here?’.”

go-deeper

They believe that being that little bit detached, in terms of age, allows them to come down harder, when appropriate, on those they analyse. I suggest that many within the sports industry police themselves carefully when on television or radio these days, cautious about a public backlash.

“Life’s too short and f*** them,” Lalas says, bluntly.

Advertisement

“Ultimately, I’m talking about soccer. I know we get incredibly passionate and emotional about these things — something I love about sports. I try to be honest and sometimes it comes off in different ways and people perceive it differently. It’s one thing over a keyboard but it’s a very different type of interaction in normal life. There are people that come up to me who disagree with me but we have a cordial, civil and respectful conversation, even if we vehemently disagree about things on and off the soccer field.”

His on-screen character, he says, takes inspiration beyond sports broadcasting. “It is an element of a shock jock, an element of political commentary, an element of late-night television host. And then when it came to actual sports, I grew up in the ESPN age where the hot take was happening, but then I also like Gary Lineker (the former England international striker and long-time presenter of the BBC’s football coverage in the UK).

“The way he talks about things, you almost forget that he was a player — and not just a player, but a f***ing great player. When I hear him talk about the game and life, even if I agree or disagree with the way he does it, it makes me forget that he was once this great player because it’s interesting, informative and entertaining in the way he does it. And so I have a lot of respect for what he’s carved out.”

Lineker and Lalas share another thing in common, in that both men appear to be in a love-hate relationship with social media. Lineker’s show Match of the Day, the BBC’s Premier League highlights programme, was plunged into crisis last year after the corporation took a dim view of his political commentary on Twitter, now known as X.

If Lineker is on the centre-left, Lalas appears to be a political antidote, recently announcing on Twitter that he will be attending the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee. Like Lineker, he seems unable to resist being sucked into the vortex of culture war politics. He shared posts recently that appear sympathetic to Donald Trump and is in regular playful combat with his social media detractors. Yet he has already said that he places so much more value on in-person interactions. So why bother with X?

“I’m sure there’s an element of addiction that I will cop to,” he acknowledges. “It’s just the world in which we live. There is an element of ego. But I’m also under no delusions that I’m not solving the world’s problems. Nobody gives a s*** what the hell I have to say about most of this stuff. First off, Twitter is an information machine.”

Advertisement

But it can also be a misinformation machine.

“At times,” he laughs. “It depends on who you ask or where you look. I look at it almost as a video game that I play.

“There’s an element of poking the bear and being provocative that I enjoy. When it comes to things off the field, like politics, there is a cathartic release to being honest, especially in this day and age. There was a time we were all so bold. And now we live at times, unfortunately, in fear of the real backlash that can come from just saying something people disagree with. Whether it’s politics or sports, I don’t want to live in a world like that. Maybe this is just the way I retaliate.

“I’m not saying that it’s smart or prudent, especially if it can be alienating to people. When it comes to separating the sports and the personal, sometimes they blur and sometimes they infect or affect the other side. But I will only live once and I’d rather just be as honest as I possibly can, regardless of whether anybody listens or cares.”

During this summer’s Copa America, with the USMNT looking for signs of substantial progress under Berhalter, Lalas will be as direct as ever. Holden, too, makes clear the expectations.

Advertisement

How to follow Euro 2024 and Copa America on The Athletic


“Passing the group stage is not negotiable,” Holden insists. “If we don’t get out of a group containing Panama and Bolivia, then what are we doing? That becomes the time to make a change.”

Lalas cuts in: “Is it untenable? Maybe from the outside and how we look at it. But ultimately it’s (U.S. Soccer’s technical director) Matt Crocker who will make that decision. And he had the opportunity (Berhalter was reappointed as USMNT coach in June 2023).

“Nobody would have begrudged cleaning house and getting rid of everybody. And yet he (Crocker) didn’t. So something really bad has to happen for U.S. Soccer to make a change.

“But there are a lot of people sitting with their arms folded saying, ‘All right, Gregg, you got a long leash, you got a second opportunity, we need to see something different, we need to see something that makes us believe that come the World Cup 2026, there’s the possibility for the first time ever, that a U.S. men’s national team could win a World Cup.’ And we haven’t had those moments. He needs a statement type of game and statement type of summer to mollify some of that.”

Advertisement

Holden points out the USMNT, who exited the last World Cup in the round of 16 against the Netherlands, had the second-youngest team in Qatar and cites the draw against England, where he says the USMNT went “toe-to-toe”, as evidence of what might be possible.

Lalas says: “We’re letting the players off the hook a bit when we constantly talk about the coach. They have been given every benefit, every resource. Nothing has been spared from an early age. It is fair for us to expect more out of them individually and collectively. They’re no longer teenagers. Some of them play for the best teams and in the best leagues in the world. It’s time to put up or shut up.

“We put a lot of emphasis on coaching — and I’m not saying they can’t have an effect — but this is a players’ game. When that whistle blows, you get to decide what happens and the onus is on you. And if you want it, that’s great. If you don’t, then don’t blame the coach.”

Holden grins: “If the U.S. wins the Copa America, it’s the greatest thing they’ve ever done as a soccer nation on the men’s side — hands down.”

(Top image: Amy Sussman/Getty Images)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Culture

MLB’s Strange But True 2024: The team, game, inning and homer of the year — plus The Ohtani Game

Published

on

MLB’s Strange But True 2024: The team, game, inning and homer of the year — plus The Ohtani Game

I swear this all happened in the Strange But True baseball year of 2024:

A man played for both teams in the same game. … Another guy made an out on his own intentional walk. … And history was made at Coors Field, all because a pitcher did not throw a pitch.

I mention all that because it’s time once again for the end-of-year extravaganza you’ve been waiting for — and we have enough material for three parts. Happy Strange But True Feats of the Year column to all who celebrate!


Clonehead of the Year — Danny Jansen


Danny Jansen takes the field with the Red Sox on Aug. 26 after starting the game — on June 26 — as a member of the Blue Jays. (Paul Rutherford / Getty Images)

Cloning technology isn’t roaring along at the same furious rate as, say, TikTok video technology. But in baseball, we have the next best thing to cloning — the suspended-game rule.

And how great is that rule — baseball’s special little world of suspended animation? So great that it gifted us with one of my favorite Strange But True Games of all time.

Advertisement

Presenting … The Danny Jansen Game.

Do we need to refresh your memory of what The Danny Jansen Game was? Let’s do that. On Aug. 26, the Red Sox and Blue Jays resumed a June 26 game at Fenway Park that had been suspended by many, many raindrops in the second inning.

What made that The Strange But True Game of the Year was this: When it was halted in June, Jansen was batting for the Blue Jays. And when it resumed (one awesome Sox-Jays trade-deadline extravaganza later), Jansen was catching for the Red Sox.

So what’s so Strange But True about that? Oh, only about a billion things like this:

Wanna play catch? It makes no logical sense that a player could get taken out of a game, and then, at the same exact moment, get subbed into that game for the other team — allowing him to start an actual big-league at-bat as the hitter and then finish it as the catcher. But hey, the suspended-game rule is inventive like that.

Advertisement

So who else has ever batted and caught in the same at-bat in a big-league game? Nobody. Obviously. But also …

The guy who was on first base when Jansen came to bat for the Blue Jays (Davis Schneider) then stole second base … on Danny Jansen the catcher!

All in the same at-bat, Jansen swung at a pitch as a Blue Jay and caught a pitch for the Red Sox!

As the brilliant multitasker he is, Jansen managed to come to bat for both teams in the top and bottom of the same inning (the second). If you’re wondering who else in history has done that, you should know that answer would also be: Nobody!

And don’t check the video, because while we have plenty of video evidence that Jansen set foot in the batter’s box for the Blue Jays in this game … and was stuck there for the next seven weeks (not literally!) … he did not get credit for a plate appearance for the Blue Jays. What do you mean, you saw it with your own eyes? Who cares? It’s baseball!

Advertisement

And don’t do the math, because that’s also a problem. Jansen got credited with a game played for Toronto that day. He also got credited with a game played for Boston. But he did not get credited with two games played in the same game. Because that’s not possible. So when does one plus one equal one? Only in … baseball!

And because the baseball gods are awesome, the last batter of this game could only have been one man: Danny Jansen, who caught the first pitch of the game for one team and then made the last out of the same game for the other team.

Well, there you go. All of that happened. In real life. We saw it. Danny Jansen lived it. It was real, and it was sensational.

So how, I asked him, would he explain to his grandkids someday that it was possible to play for both teams in the same game … in the major leagues?

“Baseball is incredible,” he said. “It’s always incredible. You can’t expect that anything in baseball can’t happen. Anything’s possible.

Advertisement

“This game,” said Jansen, “is nuts.”

Strangest But Truest Inning of the Year


Jazz Chisholm Jr. can’t handle Anthony Volpe’s throw as Kiké Hernández is safe at third in a nightmare fifth inning for New York. (Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

Speaking of nuts, what do you say we relive the fifth inning of Game 5 of the World Series. (All you Yankees fans out there … you’re not eligible to reply to that question!) Of course, we need to relive it. It’s in the running for the Strangest But Truest postseason inning ever.

To refresh your memory …

• When that inning began, the Yankees were leading the Dodgers in this game, 5-0 …

• And their starting pitcher, a literally unhittable dude named Gerrit Cole, was out there launching Formula 1 speedballs clocked at 99 mph …

Advertisement

• And the Dodgers had used many more pitchers (four) than they had hits (none) …

Whereupon … stuff began happening … by which I mean stuff like this, which involved the Yankees making baseball look so much harder than we’d like to think it is …

• There was Aaron Judge clanking a routine fly ball in center field. That was one error — by a guy who has committed zero errors on any of the other 538 fly balls hit to him in the center-field portion of his career.

• There was the shortstop, Gold Glove finalist Anthony Volpe, making an unfortunate throw to third on an attempted forceout. That was two errors.

• And then, with Cole one pitch away from escaping a bases-loaded, no-out disaster, he forgot one slight detail after Mookie Betts bounced a spinning five-hopper to Anthony Rizzo at first — the detail that involves a pitcher’s brain reminding him he’s supposed to cover first base on balls like that.

Technically, there was no “error” charged to Cole for that gaffe. But the magic word there is “technically,” because a zero-run inning became a five-run inning after Cole neglected to cover first.

So an inning that started with a Gerrit Cole no-hitter watch turned into an almost incomprehensible five-run inning for that team he was no-hitting. And not just any five-run inning. A five-run inning in which all five runs were unearned.

Which meant the Dodgers would go on to win the World Series … by winning a game in which they trailed by five runsAnd just so we’re clear, that’s a sentence that has never before been typed in the history of the World Series. But that’s not all, because …

How many other teams have ever had a game in which they …

Advertisement

• Blew a five-run lead (or larger)?

• Coughed up at least five unearned runs?

• Stuffed three errors into the box score?

• And included both a balk and catcher’s interference in those festivities?

How many teams have ever done that, you ask? According to our friends from STATS Perform, exactly one team has ever done that … at least since earned (and unearned) runs became an official stat in both leagues in 1913. And that team was …

Advertisement

The 2024 Yankees … in the game that ended this World Series.

But you should also know that … we’re not just talking about postseason games. The Yankees are the first team ever to do that in any game — postseason or regular season — in the past 112 seasons.

In other words, before that fateful evening on Oct. 30, you could have told us it was impossible to lose a World Series in a game like that, and who could have disputed it? But now … uh, never mind!

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Inside the Yankees’ grisly fifth inning that proved one of the most costly in World Series history

Special Game 5 bonus note 

What’s it like to be me, the unofficial curator of Baseball Strange But Trueness, after a World Series game like that? Hey, it’s awesome, because Strange But True Max Chaos had just busted out. But also … it can take a little time to sort out just how Strange But True something actually was.

Advertisement

It takes so much time, in fact, that I didn’t send in my column on that game until 7:05 the next morning!

But that’s because it literally took all night for me — plus the great Sam Hovland and my friends from STATS — to research all that wackiness. There were so many wild research projects going on, it wasn’t until the next day — when my brain fog lifted — that I remembered something.

I forgot to include one of STATS’ best notes of the whole night! But thanks to the Strange But True Feats of the Year column, we can present that tidbit now. Here it comes.

It turns out that it’s not just hard for a team to lose a World Series game in which it took a no-hitter and a five-run lead (or larger) into the fifth inning. It’s hard to do that in any kind of game. It’s so hard, in fact, that the Yankees hadn’t even lost a regular-season game like that since …

Oct. 1, 1988!

Advertisement

A Tommy John no-hit bid went up in smoke that day. And that was nearly 6,000 games ago!

It was so long ago that 177 different pitchers have started a game for the Yankees since then … so long ago that 441 different Yankees have grabbed a bat and headed for the batter’s box since then … and so long ago that Derek Jeter, Bernie Williams and Jorge Posada alone combined to bat almost 30,000 times in between — and then spent another decade in retirement.

In other words, a loss like that never happened to Jeter, Posada or Bernie in any October baseball game, or any other kind of baseball game. But it somehow happened to the Yankees, in the last game of this World Series, because, as John Sterling would tell you — Susan, that’s …

Baseball!

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Why Dodgers’ Game 5 win over Yankees was the craziest World Series clincher ever

Advertisement

Sneaky Pete’s Strangest But Truest Homer of the Year

Did you know that thanks to that Game 5 Yankees meltdown, this October set the all-time record for most lead changes in one postseason (with 30 of them)? My friend Katie Sharp of Baseball Reference went to way too much trouble to calculate that little nugget. So thanks, Katie!

That tidbit tells us there were far too many epic Strange But True October comebacks to fit into this column. But if I had to pick the Strangest But Truest of them all, I’m going with this one.

So what made that stunning swing of the bat by Pete Alonso so Strange But True? Thanks for asking!

Advertisement

Did that really happen? As the Mets came to bat in the ninth inning that night, in a winner-take-all Game 3 of their Wild Card Series in Milwaukee …

• They were trailing that game, 2-0, and were three outs from making tee-time reservations.

• None of their previous 17 hitters had gotten a hit! (They were 0-for-16, with one hit batter!)

• No Met but Francisco Lindor had gotten a hit since the seventh inning of Game 2! (His teammates were 0 for their last 29!)

• 105 Mets hitters had dug into the batter’s box in this series. They’d combined to hit zero home runs!

Advertisement

• Pete Alonso, who was about to bash that life-changing home run, was 5 for his past 41 (a .122 average) … and hadn’t had an extra-base hit since Sept. 19!

• The man on the mound, normally untouchable Brewers closer Devin Williams, hadn’t allowed a home run, to anyone, in 57 days — spanning 78 consecutive hitters. So since that last home run, the unfortunate humans who had to face him were batting .097, and “slugging” .153. And 36 of those 78 (46.2 percent) had struck out!

And then that closer served up a homer to that hitter in the ninth inning of that game, a winner-take-all October special? Whoa. But wait. It was even more improbable than that. Let’s talk more about …

The Devin Williams Factor — October is quite a month, isn’t it? You watch baseball, day after day, month after month, from April to September. You start to think you have a rough idea of what to expect. But if you’d spent any time watching Devin Williams, you would never have expected that.

• How many runs did the Brewers closer allow all season? That would be three, in 22 appearances. How many runs did he allow in the ninth inning of this game? That would be four. Granted, he was hurt for the first four months. But think about it. He gave up more runs in that inning than he’d given up all season? How Strange But True is that?

Advertisement

• This was the 116th time Williams had thrown a pitch in the ninth inning of any game, regular season or postseason, in his career. Want to guess how many times he’d allowed a lead-flipping (i.e., leading to trailing) home run in the ninth of any of those other 115 games? If you guessed “none,” you’re thinking right along with us here.

• Then there was that pitch. Until that wave of Alonso’s bat, Williams had thrown 190 of his killer changeups this season, according to Statcast. So how many of those 190 changeups had landed on the other side of the fence? Once again, “none” would be a great guess.

• And finally, there’s this: Think about how many pitchers have gone to the mound at least 150 times in the live-ball era. You know which of those pitchers had allowed the lowest slugging percentage in their whole career, when pitching with a lead? I think you do.

The answer, according to Baseball Reference/Stathead, was Devin Williams! Opposing hitters who found themselves in the position the Mets were in had “slugged” .254 against him. And then that happened.


With the odds stacked against him, Pete Alonso powered the Mets to a series-clinching win. (John Fisher / Getty Images)

Hey, but one more thing. Before we move on, you need to contemplate …

Advertisement

Where this fits on the list of iconic October moments – In Tim Britton’s sensational piece on this game in The Athletic, this Pete Alonso passage jumped out at me:

Did he understand Thursday night the magnitude of what he’d just achieved?

“Not right now,” he said with a smile, before a pause. “I don’t think I ever will.”

Or maybe he’ll stumble upon this edition of the Strange But True Feats of the Year column. What was the magnitude of this moment? Let’s fill him in on just how magnitudinous it really was.

A lead-flipping home run in the ninth inning of a winner-take-all game? OK, Pete. Take this in. The complete list of men who have ever hit one of those consists of … just you!

Advertisement

Yes, you read that right. No one in history had ever hit a home run, in the ninth inning of a winner-take-all postseason game, that turned a series loss into a series win until …

Pete Alonso hit That Homer off That Closer to leave Mets fans — and Strange But True fans — everywhere That Moment to remember him by. Amazin’.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Pete Alonso’s amazin’, improbable October home run and a Mets comeback for the ages

Strangest But Truest Team of the Year — the White Sox


Andrew Vaughn holds his head as the White Sox finish the final week of a brutal season. (Michael Reaves / Getty Images)

They lost more games than Choo Choo Coleman’s fabled 1962 Mets. Their fans tried to avoid recognition by hiding their faces under paper bags.

Their manager, Pedro Grifol, made it to 100 games under .500 (in less than two years), then got fired. They went nearly four weeks without winning a game. And when they finally won one, their stadium ran out of beer to wash it down with.

Advertisement

These were just the “highlights” of the Strange But True season of those 2024 Chicago White Sox. I promise I didn’t root for them to do any of this stuff. But I must admit that because they did, this portion of the column practically wrote itself.

How can there not be a major motion picture about this team? Out of the Money-ball. I’d watch it! Now here’s just some of what you’d see.

They knocked Casey Stengel out of the history books! Who said a team couldn’t lose more games than Stengel’s illustrious ’62 Mets (40-120), the longtime gold standard for futility? These White Sox proved it was totally possible. They even won five of their last six and still went 41-121.

How nuts was that? The Phillies won their 41st game on May 31. The White Sox won their 41st on the last day of the season … 121 days later!

They finished 41 games out of next-to-last place! Was 41 the ultimate White Sox magic number? The next-closest team in the AL Central (the Twins) finished 41 games ahead of them. And there was never a day all season when the White Sox were ahead of any team in their division.

Advertisement

The ’62 Mets only finished 18 games out of next-to-last place. The 119-loss 2003 Tigers only finished 20 games out of next-to-last. The worst team in the history of the planet, the 134-loss 1899 Cleveland Spiders, only finished 35 games out of next-to-last place. No team in the modern era had ever even finished 40 games out of next-to-last. But the White Sox were already 38 out of next-to-last before they even made it to September.

You didn’t need a web browser to find them in the standings. You needed a submarine.

They fell to 84 under .500! If you looked at the standings on Sept. 22, with a week to go in the season, I hope you wore your eclipse glasses — because the White Sox were an eyeball-shocking 84 games under .500 (36-120).

So how many other teams since 1900 have ever been 84 under at any point? None would be a good guess.

Only three other teams in the history of this sport reached 84 under — and it’s been a while: Those 1899 Spiders finished 114 under (20-134). … Kirtley Baker’s 1890 Pittsburgh Alleghenys finished 90 under (23-113). … And Toad Ramsey’s 1889 Louisville Colonels finished at exactly 84 under (27-111). Always great to walk with legends like those outfits.

Advertisement

They even caught Jeff Stone’s illustrious ’88 Orioles! What group of legendary losers didn’t the White Sox bring back to life this year? They even ran down the team with the longest losing streak in American League history, Jumpin’ Jeff Stone’s 1988 Orioles.

Those Orioles lost their first 21 games of the season, then spent the next three and a half decades in an orbit of their own. But here came the 2024 White Sox, to dredge up their own brand of 21-game losing-streak fun from July 10 to Aug. 5.

• You know how hard it is to go that long without winning? It’s so hard that 197 different pitchers won a game for the other 29 teams in that time when the White Sox were winning zero games. Yep, 197!

• It also takes a while to lose that many games. It took the White Sox so long that they used 38 different players during the streak. Yep, 38!

• One of those 38 was a rookie infielder named Brooks Baldwin. The really cool news was, he made his big-league debut for the White Sox on July 19. The not quite that cool news was, of the first 16 games he played in, his team lost all 16 of them.

Advertisement

• Oh, and one more thing: According to the Baseball Reference transactions page, since the trade deadline was going on during this run of ineptitude, an incredible 171 players got traded — all in that stretch when the White Sox never won a single freaking baseball game.

In other news, they also did all this!

• Would you believe the White Sox started the season by going 0-14 on games played on a Monday? Of course, they were 66 games under .500 on the other six days of the week, too.

• Would you believe they had a streak in the second half in which they went 1-27 at home? The Phillies only lost 26 games in Philadelphia the whole darned season. The White Sox lost 27 in their town in eight weeks.

• Would you believe that, in a related development, on Aug. 28-29, the Rangers won more games at Guaranteed Rate Field in 24 hours (three) than the White Sox had won in the previous 61 days and 13,660 hours (two)?

Advertisement

• Would you believe this team piled up so many losses, it was eliminated from any kind of playoff race on Aug. 17? That was Game 124, but who’s counting?

• Would you believe the White Sox were so good at losing, they lost more games before the end of August (106) than Michael Jordan’s Bulls lost in their six championship seasons combined (104)?

• And, finally, would you believe these White Sox went more than four months — from May 11 to Sept. 15 — without winning a series against a team from their own league? But what the heck? They only got to play 23 of those series in between!

These were your 2024 Chicago White Sox, chasing history — kind of in the way that “Daddy Day Camp” (Rotten Tomatoes score: 1) chased cinematic history.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

An owner who ‘thinks he knows everything’ led the White Sox to historic disaster

Advertisement

The man from the Planet Ohtanus


Shohei Ohtani had 17 total bases on his historic night in Miami. (Chris Arjoon / Getty Images)

I got to spend a few weeks this October watching Shohei Ohtani play. Here was the best part about doing that: I learned something about this guy.

There are many things in life — and also in baseball — that we’ve always described as “impossible.” But the man from Planet Ohtanus has no idea why the rest of us even use that word.

The stuff we think of as impossible is stuff he looks at and thinks: Hey, maybe I’ll wake up tomorrow and try to do that.

So that brings us to a performance we’ll dare to call The Ohtani Game. It might go down as the greatest game any baseball player has ever had. It’s also the game that most defied our ability to imagine what a human, a member of our species, could do over nine innings.

This was Sept. 19 in Miami — when Ohtani laid out this unfathomable Mission (Not) Impossible:

Advertisement

6-for-6

3 home runs

5 extra-base hits

2 stolen bases

10 RBIs …

Advertisement

And this box-score line never before witnessed in a major-league game:

6-4-6-10

Oh, yeah. And one more thing: It was in this game that he dropped all those feats on the day he became the first man ever to join the 50-Homer, 50-Steal Club.

Seriously!

So what are we to make of this performance of the Greatest Shoh on Earth? I’ve been thinking about that for three months. Here’s what:

Three homers, 10 RBIs and two stolen bases! Steven Kwan led off for the AL in the All-Star Game — and he never had a calendar month this year with three homers, 10 RBIs and two stolen bases. Neither did Bo Bichette. Neither did Javy Báez. But that was one day in the life of Shohei Ohtani. Unreal.

Six hits in one game. Does that seem like a lot? Let’s go with yes. Here are just some of the guys who never had a six-hit game: Ted Williams … Stan Musial … Derek Jeter … and the hit king, Pete Rose, who never did that once along the road to 4,256 hits.

Five extra-base hits in one game. Did you know that Babe Freaking Ruth never got five extra-base hits in one game? Neither did Albert Pujols. How ’bout Barry Bonds? Nope. Not him, either. And remember the artist formerly known as José Abreu? He didn’t even get five extra-base hits all season. But the amazing Shohei got five in three hours, because why the heck not?

Three homers in one game. I know it seems like lots of random dudes are running around hitting three bombs in a game these days. But just for perspective, you want to hear the names of a few guys who never had a three-homer game? Well, David Ortiz for one. And Fred McGriff. Not to mention Vladimir Guerrero — both of them.

Advertisement

10 RBIs in one game. I could go on for hours spitting out the names of guys who never drove in 10 runs in one game. But here are a few you may be familiar with: Willie Mays. Mickey Mantle. Henry Aaron. Ted Williams. And Miguel Cabrera.

10 RBIs and two stolen bases in one game. So … do you think anybody else ever had a game with that many RBIs and that many steals? Get a grip. Before Ohtani, only 15 players had ever had a game with just the 10-RBI part of that daily double. You know how many stolen bases those 15 men combined for in those games? That would be exactly … zero!

10 RBIs from the leadoff hitter? Richie Ashburn was a Hall of Fame leadoff man for the Phillies. In 1959, he got to the plate 427 times in the leadoff hole – and drove in a total of eight runs. Sixty-five years later, along came this superhero from Planet Ohtanus — and drove in 10 out of the leadoff hole in six trips to the plate? Yeah, he did. So how many other leadoff hitters have ever had a 10-RBI game in the 105 seasons since RBIs became an official stat? Once again, that answer would be … zero!

Yeah, but he did all of that! Let’s sum it all up. As my friends from STATS reminded us, in those same 105 seasons, only one player has had, during his entire career …

• A game with 10+ RBIs

Advertisement

A game with 6+ hits

A game with 5+ extra-base hits

A game with 3+ home runs

A game with 2+ stolen bases

 (That’s not necessarily in the same game. That’s in any combination of games.)

Advertisement

That one player? Shohei Ohtani.

Who did all of it in The Ohtani Game.

Welcome to one afternoon in the life of Shohei Ohtani, who ohbytheway also once started the All-Star Game as a pitcher and was the closer in the championship game of the World Baseball Classic. But as I was saying, nothing is impossible on Planet Ohtanus.


The Year in Strange But True

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

MLB’s most mind-blowing hitting, pitching feats of the year — plus the 5 most ridiculous games

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

MLB’s weirdest injuries of 2024: Beware of water bottles, heating pads and walls

Advertisement

(Top photo of Shohei Ohtani hitting his 50th home run of the season: Megan Briggs / Getty Images)

Continue Reading

Culture

What has gotten into Kirby Smart? ‘I just want to fight for my team and fight for our program’

Published

on

What has gotten into Kirby Smart? ‘I just want to fight for my team and fight for our program’

ATHENS, Ga. — In the nine years Paul Finebaum had been interviewing Kirby Smart, this was as animated as Finebaum had seen Smart. They were on set together last month on Georgia’s campus, a day before the Dawgs’ game against Tennessee. It was three days after the College Football Playoff committee had dropped Smart’s team out of the projected field, and Smart was not hiding his disgust.

“He was great on the air. Off the air, he was out of this world. I mean he was genuinely angry,” Finebaum recalled last week. “I appreciated his candor. But it was a remarkable shift, especially to the last two years.”

And Smart wasn’t done. A night later, he went off on the selection committee again during his ABC postgame interview. And Smart still wasn’t done: A few weeks later, Smart took an unprompted shot — maybe playful, maybe not — at SEC commissioner Greg Sankey, who was standing a few feet away.

It has been refreshing for those who want good content. For those who have watched Smart and his sideline antics from afar, it may seem natural. But for those who have watched Smart closely through the years, it’s a stark change, and it says a lot about where Smart and No. 2 Georgia are as they get ready for their CFP quarterfinal.

The Pulse Newsletter
Advertisement

Free, daily sports updates direct to your inbox.

Free, daily sports updates direct to your inbox.

Sign UpBuy The Pulse Newsletter

Smart usually has tried to avoid making headlines, a trait he took from Nick Saban: Do your job, worry about your team, ignore the critics and outside noise. The tone was set the summer of Smart’s first year when then-Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh took a shot at Smart on Twitter about satellite camps. When he asked about it, Smart replied, “What tweet?” with a wry, knowing smile. He was ready to diffuse the story.

This season, Smart has been willing to light the fuse.


Georgia coach Kirby Smart’s Bulldogs will play Notre Dame in the Sugar Bowl. (Joshua L. Jones / USA Today Network via Imagn Images)

After Georgia’s win at Texas, Smart didn’t hold back in his ESPN postgame interview after officials reversed a call in Texas’ favor when fans threw debris on the field: “You know, these players get the best out of me. And I’m so proud of these guys. Because nobody believed. Nobody gave us a chance. Your whole network doubted us. Nobody believed us. And then they try to rob us, with calls, in this place.”

The shot at the “College GameDay” analysts who picked against Georgia wasn’t new. Smart did that after his team’s second national championship win. But “they try to rob us” was uncharacteristic. Smart, a member of the NCAA rules committee, rarely criticized officiating and didn’t join in with Georgia fans belaboring calls after the 2018 national championship game. Now he was jumping in, despite actually winning the game.

Advertisement

After his team’s win over Tennessee, Smart vented his frustration at the CFP committee, once again in his ESPN postgame interview: “I don’t know what they look for. I really don’t know what they look for anymore. I would welcome anybody in that committee to come down to this league and play in this environment.”

And finally, in the interview after the SEC Championship Game win, Smart was asked what getting a first-round bye meant: “It means rest for a team that Greg Sankey and his staff sent on the road … all … year … long!”

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Who does Georgia want to play: Notre Dame or Indiana?

Sankey stood stone-faced a few feet away but only because he couldn’t hear what Smart was saying amid audio issues on stage, according to people who were there. Not that Sankey and his staff could have been particularly thrilled with it; Georgia had just navigated that schedule to a conference championship, so Finebaum on his SEC Network show called Smart “out of line.” (The SEC championship in Atlanta came after three straight home games, so Georgia had been in its home state for almost a month.)

“I probably reacted a little quickly on that, not knowing how convoluted the story (on the stage) was,” Finebaum said. “But it was still a pretty dramatic moment for him.”

Advertisement

Smart was asked last month, after the Tennessee game, why he had been more outspoken this year. He shrugged and said it just has more to do with having more things to be outspoken about.

“The two years previous, I mean, there wasn’t a lot there,” he said. “The year that, we were 14-1 and 15-0, there’s not a lot of complaints. There’s not a lot to fight for. You take care of business on the field and handle your business. You don’t have to say a lot of things.

“That was a pretty unique situation if you’re referring to Texas. I don’t know that I’ve ever been a part of anything like that, and I’m not … I wasn’t upset with them. I just didn’t understand, like, never seen that happen, but I would have said that any year.”

But the next thing Smart said got to the heart of the matter: “I just want to fight for my team and fight for our program because I think we’ve got a deserving group of young men who work really hard, and I’m sure every coach would fight for their guys.”

But this has come amid two years of bad publicity about his program. Ten Georgia players and one staff member have been arrested for driving-related offenses since a January 2023 car crash that killed a player and staff member. There have been arrests for non-driving issues. Given all that, you almost would expect Smart to take the opposite approach and be Mr. Nice Guy as the face of the program.

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Is Kirby Smart ready to sit on Nick Saban’s vacated college football throne?

Finebaum, however, pointed out that Smart has chosen his words much more carefully when it comes to off-field issues.

“The one thing I’ll give him credit for is despite all the bad news in the offseason I think he navigated it very well,” Finebaum said. “And it didn’t seem to become a constant theme, like situations like that at other schools.”

Finebaum has another theory for Smart’s newfound candor: The pressure is gone. There’s no push for a three-peat or before that a repeat or before that trying to get the first national championship.

“Everything felt more tense (before). You could sense the gravity of the moment,” Finebaum said. “That was all gone a couple weeks ago in Athens. It was me against the world, and he seemed to like it very much.”

Advertisement

Smart has used that Georgia-against-the-world narrative before, especially en route to the second championship. It became such a punch line that Smart backed off it a bit. It was harder to play the disrespect card when Georgia was the consensus No. 1 team, even after not three-peating last year.

Then came this season’s run of on-field adversity. Smart took to calling his team the “never say die Dawgs.” They made things hard for themselves and played down to their competition, but there they still hoisted the SEC championship trophy.

Now it’s on to the Playoff where Georgia may be in the perfect position, at least to Smart’s liking: It’s not the favorite, especially having to go to its backup quarterback, so there are plenty of picks out there for the Bulldogs to be one-and-done in the tournament.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

An expert on Carson Beck timeline: ‘I wouldn’t think he’s playing anytime soon’

Somehow, it could be argued that Georgia is playing with house money.

Advertisement

“Ultimately how the season ends is going to help frame the narrative,” Finebaum said. “If somehow Georgia wins the title with everything they’ve overcome, with the schedule, with the Carson Beck injury, I think it will elevate Georgia to an even higher status. And right now, I think they are at the very top shelf of college football. … But I think if (Georgia) can pull this thing off, it won’t make up for not winning a three-peat, but it’s going to put Georgia into a completely different stratosphere.”

(Top photo: Butch Dill / Getty Images)

Continue Reading

Culture

The tennis stories of 2024, from doping bans and Grand Slam titles to a bee invasion

Published

on

The tennis stories of 2024, from doping bans and Grand Slam titles to a bee invasion

Happy holidays, and prepare for the greatest gift: tennis returns tomorrow, December 27.

In the spirit of looking back on the previous season and remembering all the moments big and small that defined it, here is a compendium of tennis stories of all kinds from The Athletic’s tennis writers, Matt Futterman and Charlie Eccleshare, with a few guest appearances. This is not a “best of,” but rather a “remember when?” and a “did that really happen?” as well as an opportunity to revisit the stories you may have missed.

Matt will hold up the front end of the year given Charlie’s joining for the full launch of tennis coverage in May. See you next season, or rather, tomorrow.  — James Hansen


“There is nothing quite like a comeback in tennis, a game that essentially punishes players for time away.

Ranking points disappear. There is no job protection the way there might be for an athlete in a team sport, with an organization committed to managing a rehabilitation, if only to salvage value from a contract. There are no practice starts without consequences in the minor leagues to ease the transition back to top-tier competition.

Advertisement

For older players, the game, the practice sessions, the matches, they all hurt more.”

Matt Futterman

“Mirra Andreeva showed up to tennis in the middle of last season, like the new kid at school whose mother or father has just been transferred into the local branch office.

One day, no one had ever heard of her, the next, she’s all anyone is talking about: 16 years old, three days into the online version of her junior year in high school, complaining about the homework and taking over this Australian Open.”

Matt Futterman

Advertisement

“There was Andy Murray (or was it an actor named Fraser McKnight?) looking very serious, sitting for a tell-all interview.

“The players, the matches, it’s all just made up,” he said. “Let’s face it, people are stupid, so they’ll buy anything.”

There was Novak Djokovic coming clean about his true identity as the actor Bert Critchley, practising ripping his shirt in front of a bathroom mirror and discussing his process of getting into character.

“I want to bring truth to Novak,” he said. “What is he thinking, what is he feeling, what would motivate him, if he was a real person?””

Matt Futterman

Advertisement

“Maybe one day his name will become household. Or maybe not. Tennis is a difficult business; only a tiny sample size of its athletes achieve enough to become part of the vernacular. But what Top Nidunjianzan already has done is extraordinary. In the 50 years since the ATP Tour started its singles ranking system, not a single player from Tibet had earned a single ranking point. Nidunjianzan has 20 of them and ranks 869th in the world.”

Dana O’Neil


Fnu (Top) Nidunjianzan in Tibet. (Courtesy of Princeton Athletics)

“For several minutes, Alcaraz stood in the center of the court in his warm-up jacket, conveying his fears to Davis and a tournament supervisor. They assured him the random flying bee he might still see was harmless.

“If I see the bee, I cannot concentrate on the ball,” he told them.

Both are yellow after all.

Advertisement

Matt Futterman

“No one will ever know whether tennis would have experienced a surge in popularity had more of the best players let in the cameras the way some of the biggest stars in F1 and golf have in recent years for Drive to Survive and Full Swing, the golf equivalent. Still, in many ways, the failure of Break Point revealed some of the long-running fractures and countervailing interests throughout tennis, especially at a time when the best players treat access to their lives as their intellectual property.”

Matt Futterman

“We do compete in many countries that certainly reflect different cultures and value systems,” said Steve Simon, the chief executive of the WTA Tour. “We certainly understand and respect that Saudi is something that provokes some very strong views.”

Matt Futterman

Advertisement

Challengers, Tashi and the film’s director Luca Guadagnino have plenty to say about that metaphysical quandary. They have plenty to say about the aggression-filled flow state two players enter when they are in the middle of a high-octane match, rhythmically pounding and pattering a ball back and forth across a net.

Challengers may not really be a tennis movie — but it has plenty to say about the quintessence of the sport.

Matt Futterman

“One normal day of Corentin Moutet, that’s all we ask. It will never happen.”

James Hansen

Advertisement

“Initially, it was thought that the bottle might have been thrown deliberately because footage of the incident obscured where the bottle had come from. However, video shows the bottle slipping out of a spectactor’s backpack as they bend over to attempt to get the attention of the 24-time Grand Slam champion.”

Charlie Eccleshare

“The knee-jerk reaction is that women don’t bring in as much money as the men and if they did, they wouldn’t be second-class citizens. Yet consider a counter-narrative: during the 55-year history of the sport’s modern era, if women had received the same exposure and investment as men and didn’t have to confront countless barriers and aggressions, maybe they would be bringing in the same amount of money.”

Matt Futterman

“The dominance becomes self-fulfilling once she wins a few games and she and her opponent both feel like they know what’s coming next, so the starts and ends of points become more inevitable; what happens in between is less important.”

Advertisement

Charlie Eccleshare

“The world of invention is full of products and gadgets intended for one purpose that found their groove with another.

Bubble wrap was supposed to be three-dimensional wallpaper. Viagra was a new blood pressure medication. The slinky was a surefire way to secure naval instruments in rough seas.

Umpire-Head-Camera, welcome to the ranks of unintended consequences.”

Matt Futterman

Advertisement

Corentin Moutet was just one of the players to fall victim. (Eurosport)

“The weeks before the French Open had been filled with doubts. He had barely been able to practice. It seemed like what he had experienced during the previous year, and even for some months before that, was coming for him all over again.

Back then, Alcaraz was starting to gain a reputation as a beautiful but possibly brittle player. His young body, so fast and so strong, way beyond the level of most 20/21-year-olds, somehow kept betraying him.”

Matt Futterman

“All the pent-up emotion that Murray must have been feeling for days, weeks, months, even the seven years since he limped off this court with a hip injury against Sam Querrey and was never the same again, could pour out.”

Charlie Eccleshare

Advertisement

“For the second time in five weeks, Paolini, the diminutive Italian, has forced everyone in the sport to forget everything they thought they knew about the modern version of tennis. She has reminded them of one of the things, maybe even the thing, that makes tennis special.”

Matt Futterman

“After Krejcikova left the court, she saw her name next to Novotna’s on the board that lists the champions on a wall inside the All England Club. Emotion overcame her then.

Afterwards, she said she had been dreaming of Novotna lately. In the dreams, they are talking. She didn’t want to say about what.

“It’s a little personal,” she said.”

Advertisement

Matt Futterman


Barbora Krejcikova’s Wimbledon title stretched back into her tennis youth. (Clive Brunskill / Getty Images)

“Andy Murray made you care.

That was his superpower. There were better players in his era; there were more stylish ones. But none possessed the ability to make you invest emotionally in their matches as much as Murray did.”

Charlie Eccleshare

“I have no cartilage in my knees,” Bopanna repeated several times during a recent interview, emphasizing the absurdity of what he has accomplished despite all that. He shook his head. He shrugged his shoulders. Then he recalled asking a relative, a yoga teacher, if she could help.

Advertisement

At the time, it was not a particularly serious question. The answer ended up changing his life.

Matt Futterman

Aged seven, Zheng went to Wuhan with her father to play in front of a coach. She impressed so much that she would stay there to train — alone.

“Now I can tell him I made history,” she said, beaming with the brightest of smiles.

Matt Futterman

Advertisement

“Djokovic went to the center of the court and knelt in prayer, crossing his chest, his closed eyes looking skyward with his arms raised in the air. He crouched on the clay, crying more, his hands trembling.”

Matt Futterman

“All of these processes follow the Tennis Anti-Doping Program (TADP) regulations. But that hasn’t stopped the fury from Sinner’s fellow players.”

Charlie Eccleshare

“Gauff knows this isn’t about just about her. During her lifetime, Black Americans have become some of the biggest stars in tennis and in some cases have transcended the sport, especially in the U.S.”

Advertisement

Matt Futterman

“Most people can envisage dating someone who does the same job or works for the same company. But most people’s jobs don’t involve travelling the world to play a very selfish sport in front of thousands of people, sometimes with — or even against — your partner.”

Charlie Eccleshare


It was a summer of love in tennis in 2024. (Getty Images; design: Meech Robinson)

“How did that chirpy teenager suddenly get to this middle-age existence, wife and kids and in-law dinners, wearing the status of millennial tennis wise man?

Where does life, his and ours, go?”

Advertisement

Matt Futterman

“Muchova has come from a place that no tennis player wants to go. After that surgery in February, on the area of the body tennis players most dread becoming damaged, Muchova worried she might not play the sport again.”

Charlie Eccleshare

“Something about the human backboard nature of her play, the hard (but not too hard), flat power of ball after ball after ball opposing off her racket. The beauty of her game, her economic and elegant movement, and the subtle scything of her forehand almost go unnoticed.

She is plenty steady, sure, but that doesn’t begin to describe her. Stealthy is more like it.”

Advertisement

Matt Futterman

“Sabalenka can be funny and bubbly off the court but has a temper to match her athletic gifts on it, and an obduracy that follows her out of the tramlines too. When the stress ramped up, she would get so hot she could barely breathe or function, let alone serve.

That is when it helps to have someone with a background in martial arts: a discipline in controlling your breathing and your emotions when you are facing someone beating the crap out of you.”

Matt Futterman

“Both are so quick that they look like they could be Olympic sprinters, and where Alcaraz lunges and bends like his limbs are putty, Sinner dives and twirls like a superhero escaping from a burning building.”

Advertisement

Charlie Eccleshare

“Forlan expected to spend much of his retirement honing his golf game, but instead has found himself drawn back to tennis. Nothing else gives him the same satisfaction as the sport that, along with football, he excelled at in his youth.”


Diego Forlan’s professional debut was one of the less likely stories of the year. (Kevin Santamaria / Tenis al Maximo)

“When the WTA go to Saudi, I would say they should adopt a political prisoner’s case and take it on and say ‘OK, we’re going, but we are also advocating for them. And Manahel al-Otaibi (the jailed fitness instructor) is the closest case you could have to sports. Say, ‘We are happy to be in Saudi. We’re happy that Saudi women are to now play tennis. But what about Manahel al-Otaibi?’”

Charlie Eccleshare

“Jannik Sinner is trying to speak, but his own name is resounding too loudly across the Inalpi Arena in Turin. Lit up on billboards, written on placards, chanted across the aisles. Sinner, the first Italian to achieve the men’s world No. 1 ranking, isn’t just the featured attraction of the ATP Tour Finals tournament in his home country: He is the tournament, on the court and off it.”

Advertisement

Matt Futterman

“Instead of letting her serve become a complete albatross, Errani has used her ground skills, tactical nous and the shock factor of a serve that regularly registers around 60mph (96.5kph) on the speed gun to reach the very top of tennis in singles and doubles.”

Charlie Eccleshare

“For two decades, whatever outrageous fortune controls tennis injuries kept slinging arrows at Rafael Nadal.

When the Spaniard finally raised his white flag last month, he admitted defeat to an opponent he had vanquished not just in his later years but for two decades, until he couldn’t win the battle any more.”

Advertisement

Matt Futterman


Rafael Nadal’s retirement was one of many that defined the year. (Julian Finney / Getty Images)

“Both Swiatek’s one-month suspension and the decision not to ban Jannik Sinner for his two positive tests for clostebol, an anabolic steroid, have been conducted according to ITIA protocol. Both cases have also revealed deep wells of mistrust and anger within tennis from fans and players alike, confused at players being allowed to play while under investigation. Everything has been done by the book. The book appears in need of a rewrite.”

Matt Futterman

“I wasn’t alone,” she said. “It wasn’t something wrong with me.”

Matt Futterman

Advertisement

“I was like, ‘Oh my god, it’s my boyfriend’s birthday. Like happy birthday. I love you.’ And then, boom!

“It was so normal for me that I didn’t think about it.”

Charlie Eccleshare and Matt Futterman

(Top photo: Mark J. Terrill / Associated Press)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending