Connect with us

Business

Trump’s Return to Fox News Gets a Cool Reception … on Fox News

Published

on

Trump’s Return to Fox News Gets a Cool Reception … on Fox News

Reunions might be awkward.

Former President Donald J. Trump lastly returned this week to his previous stomping floor, Fox Information, after a number of months away. The chilly reception from a few of his one-time media allies underscored his uneasy place for the time being in Republican politics.

Sure, Sean Hannity, the Fox Information anchor who performed the interview, listened patiently as Mr. Trump reeled off his regular speaking factors concerning the “faux information media” and “horrible” Democrats. The previous president stated Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, a possible rival for the Republican presidential nomination, can be toiling “at a pizza parlor” with out his endorsement. And he concluded with the grim evaluation that “our nation is lifeless.”

However whereas Fox Information and Mr. Trump existed for years in a type of symbiosis — with on-air personalities effusively praising Mr. Trump, and benefiting from large scores for his frequent appearances — the community is not the all-encompassing Trump secure area it was.

Rupert Murdoch has used media properties like Fox Information to advertise Mr. DeSantis as a possible savior of the Republican Social gathering. Till this week, Mr. Trump had not appeared on a Fox Information broadcast since declaring his candidacy in November. And minutes after Mr. Trump’s interview aired, community personalities had been taking the previous president to activity.

Advertisement

Laura Ingraham, whose prime-time program instantly follows “Hannity,” was as soon as so near Mr. Trump that she attended his election evening occasion in November 2020. On her Monday present, she allowed the New York Put up columnist Miranda Devine to criticize Mr. Trump for “complaining endlessly concerning the previous” and “continuously dwelling on grievance.”

When her different visitor, the Trump loyalist Stephen Miller, loudly interjected that the previous president “has put ahead a brand new coverage plan each week,” Ms. Ingraham sounded skeptical of his argument. “Why isn’t he speaking about them?” she requested Mr. Miller.

The following morning, Jason Chaffetz, a former Republican congressman turned Fox Information contributor, denounced Mr. Trump’s efficiency as “completely horrific.”

“I voted for Donald Trump twice, I’ve defended him numerous occasions; I believed he was horrific,” Mr. Chaffetz stated. “I believe that was the worst interview I’ve seen the president do.” He went on to criticize the previous president for “whining,” “complaining” and enjoying “the sufferer card.” Steve Doocy and Brian Kilmeade, two of the co-hosts of the morning present “Fox & Associates,” additionally knocked Mr. Trump’s efficiency.

Nielsen scores — one in every of Mr. Trump’s most well-liked metrics — supplied their very own type of robust evaluation. In previous years, a Trump interview would nearly all the time ship Fox Information’s largest viewers of the day. On Monday, Mr. Trump drew 3.04 million viewers, greater than the common episode of “Hannity,” however properly under that day’s viewership for “The 5” and “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”

Advertisement

With a defamation go well with towards Fox Information filed by Dominion Voting Techniques hurtling towards a trial, it was notable that Mr. Hannity’s interview with Mr. Trump was pretaped. Mr. Trump’s baseless claims a couple of “rigged” 2020 election are central to the Dominion case; a dwell look by Mr. Trump through which he repeats these claims could possibly be hazardous for the community. It may additionally put a Fox Information anchor within the awkward place of getting to contradict Mr. Trump on-air, the type of change that might simply go viral and switch off a number of the community’s viewers.

Mr. DeSantis, in the meantime, continues to depend on Fox Information and different Murdoch properties for his main media appearances, whilst his absence from different conservative-friendly shops like Breitbart Information has come underneath new scrutiny.

Megyn Kelly, the previous Fox Information star who now hosts a profitable podcast, revealed to listeners this week that Mr. DeSantis has been ducking her invites.

“I really like Piers Morgan, he’s a pal of mine, however why would you go sit with the British man and never come on this present?” Ms. Kelly said on her program, referring to Mr. DeSantis’s current interview with the London-based Mr. Morgan.

“I’ll enterprise to say he’s afraid,” Ms. Kelly added. “I’m simply going to place it on the market: he’s afraid as a result of he is aware of the type of interview that I’d give him. He’s not going to get a go.”

Advertisement

The Florida governor avoids most one-on-one interactions with the mainstream media. Apart from a current look on Eric Bolling’s Newsmax program, Mr. DeSantis has leaned extensively on venues managed by Mr. Murdoch, even these based mostly abroad. He gave an interview to The Instances of London. Mr. Morgan relies at TalkTV, a British community owned by Mr. Murdoch, though his DeSantis interview aired on the streaming channel Fox Nation and was excerpted by The New York Put up.

It has not been misplaced on Mr. Trump’s allies that Mr. DeSantis’s ballot numbers have softened at a second when he’s having fun with principally sympathetic protection from Fox Information.

And there are refined indicators that Mr. DeSantis could not all the time have the ability to financial institution on the community’s good graces. On Tuesday, Jesse Watters, a co-host of “The 5,” supplied some recommendation to the Florida governor within the wake of Mr. Trump’s assaults.

“DeSantis is taking a bruising,” Mr. Watters stated. “If I had been Ron, I’d begin speaking. As a result of every single day that goes by, Trump attracts blood.” He added: “What number of extra weeks and months is that this going to maintain itself? Ron’s bought to come back out and say one thing, or else he’s simply going to limp into this main.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Business

Fast food chains launch 'value menu' war after cost complaints. Will it last?

Published

on

Fast food chains launch 'value menu' war after cost complaints. Will it last?

Millions of American families are hitting the road to start summer vacation, and ordering food on the run tends to be par for the course. It couldn’t come at a better time. Fast food joints are in the midst of a budget-meal war, offering promotions to lure customers back to their restaurants despite inflation woes and a minimum-wage increase in California and other states.

Starting June 25, McDonald’s will offer a month-long deal featuring a combo meal —either a McChicken, a McDouble or four-piece chicken nuggets, small fries and a small drink — for $5.

After McDonald’s announcement last month, other fast food restaurants followed suit. Wendy’s announced its $3 limited-time breakfast combo meal and Burger King trumpeted that it planned to bring back its $5 Your Way Meal.

In addition, fast food mobile apps continue to offer deep discounts.

App relief

Earlier this week, a Big Mac with medium fries and medium drink cost $11.79 before tax at a McDonald’s in Santa Ana. That same meal ordered via a mobile app for pickup at the same location cost $6.50 before tax, a savings of $5.29.

Advertisement

But the prices and deals tend to vary depending on the user.

Diners have taken to complaining on Reddit about the McDonald’s mobile app. Some say the deals decrease with use. Others say their friends or partners were getting a better deal on the app than they were getting. A few mentioned that they could find better deals by just walking in and ordering at their local McDonald’s.

The plethora of promotional deals come after diners blasted fast food companies on social media earlier this year for rising prices.

In response, Joe Erlinger, president of McDonald’s USA, said in an open letter last month that the average price of McDonald’s menu items is up an estimated 40% since 2019.

The McDonald’s restaurant logo and golden arch is lit up in Chicago. McDonald’s plans to introduce a $5 meal deal in the U.S. in June 2024 to counter slowing sales and customers’ frustration with high prices.

Advertisement

(Jeff Roberson / Associated Press)

“Recently, we have seen viral social posts and poorly sourced reports that McDonald’s has raised prices significantly beyond inflationary rates. This is inaccurate,” Erlinger wrote.

“The average price of a Big Mac in the U.S. was $4.39 in 2019,” he said. “Despite a global pandemic and historic rises in supply chain costs, wages and other inflationary pressures in the years that followed, the average cost is now $5.29. That’s an increase of 21% (not 100%),” as unsubstantiated claims allege on social media.

Quick-service restaurants said the increases were in response to rising inflation and labor costs — partly due to hikes in minimum wage not just in California but throughout the country.

Advertisement

It’s true that quick-service restaurants such as McDonalds have had to contend with increased costs, but they are by no means hurting, said Shubhranshu Singh, an associate professor at Johns Hopkins University who specializes in quick-service marketing.

“They are not struggling,” Singh said. “Inflation is going up. Wage rates are going up. But profit for McDonald’s is also going up.”

Global comparable sales for McDonald’s grew nearly 2% in the first quarter of the year, according to the latest statistics made available by the company. The fast-food giant described this profit increase as having “benefited from average check growth driven by strategic menu price increases.”

Price-weary diners have taken notice and become fed up with the price hikes, choosing to eat less fast food and protesting on social media that their go-to budget meals were no longer wallet-friendly, Singh said.

Several diners took aim at McDonald’s, griping on TikTok about the company charging more for food that’s supposed to be affordable.

Advertisement

“This is $3 worth of food,” said a customer who held up a hash brown. “Something doesn’t seem right here.”

“McDonald’s has gotten too cocky,” said another customer. “Y’all not supposed to be expensive.”

One diner called it “absurd” that she’d paid $4.59 for a medium order of french fries.

And then there was the uproar over a McDonald’s location in Connecticut charging $18 for a Big Mac combo meal. The photo sparked a nationwide debate on soaring fast-food prices.

Making choices

Most McDonald’s in the United States are independently franchised, so prices vary depending on where one visits.

Advertisement

Increased fast food prices ultimately led to slower-than-expected sales at various quick-service restaurants, such as McDonald’s, Starbucks and Pizza Hut.

“Consumers are always making choices,” said restaurant analyst Sara Senatore at Bank of America. “When the value proposition starts to diminish, consumers will make other choices.”

Up until fairly recently, consumers were willing to pay more for quick-service food. When fast food prices started to soar in 2022, consumers just went along because prices everywhere had surged due to inflation, Senatore said.

But now inflation has lessened. Grocery prices have fallen and budget-conscious consumers may no longer see fast food as the clear-cut affordable choice, she said.

Enter the value meals.

Advertisement
People carrying red and yellow flags rally outside Los Angeles City Hall.

Fast food workers rally in favor of a proposed minimum wage increase outside Los Angeles City Hall in 2022. The approved increase went into effect on April 1 and was considered a victory for organized labor.

(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times)

Budget meals aren’t new. In the 1980s, McDonald’s, Wendy’s and Burger King engaged in a series of advertising campaigns known as the Burger Wars competing for customers in the then-flourishing fast food market.

“The hope is that the consumer will go there and maybe buy something additional to the value meal and then want to return even when there is no deal,” Singh said.

But the promotions, analysts warned, can’t last forever.

Advertisement

“It’s not sustainable,” Singh said. “I don’t expect any of these deals to stay.”

Continue Reading

Business

Dominic Ng: Philanthropist banker, inclusion practitioner

Published

on

Dominic Ng: Philanthropist banker, inclusion practitioner

The year 2023 was especially cruel to regional banks in California. Repeated interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve exposed the poor bets and hubris of regional highfliers like Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic. Those banks capsized, which sparked bank runs, which wiped shareholders out.

One regional bank, however, smoothly sailed on: East West Bank, helmed for more than 30 years by Dominic Ng, who champions the durable power of steady growth. “We’re prudent and cautious, but very entrepreneurial,” he said from his office at East West headquarters in Pasadena. “The way you win in banking is not through shortcuts. It’s a long game.”

‘His leadership has transformed the bank, transformed philanthropy and what business leadership looks like in L.A.’

— Elise Buik, United Way of Greater Los Angeles’ chief executive

Advertisement

The result has been accolades: No. 1 best-performing bank in its size category last year from S&P Global Market Intelligence and No. 1 performing bank in 2023 by trade publication Bank Director. The diversity of its board of directors — Latino, Asian, Black, female and LGBTQ+ all represented — has also won acclaim.

Steady profits enabled East West to become one of Los Angeles’ top civic benefactors. Ng has been especially active with the United Way of Greater Los Angeles for more than 25 years and is credited with championing a strategic change in direction to more effectively serve the city’s desperately poor, while persuading more of the city’s richest residents to pitch in.

Discover the changemakers who are shaping every cultural corner of Los Angeles. This week we bring you The Money, a collection of bankers, political bundlers, philanthropists and others whose deep pockets give them their juice. Come back each Sunday for another installment.

Advertisement

“His leadership has transformed the bank, transformed philanthropy and what business leadership looks like in L.A.,” said Elise Buik, the United Way chapter’s chief executive.

Born to Chinese parents in Hong Kong in 1959, the youngest of six children, Ng has been chief executive of East West Bank since 1992 and expanded on the bank’s original mission of financing Chinese immigrants who in the 1970s found it difficult to qualify for loans through the usual channels. It’s now the largest publicly traded independent bank based in Southern California, serving an economically and ethnically diverse clientele. On the world stage, Ng serves as co-chair of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Business Advisory Council.

Ng, 65, worries about the future of philanthropy in Los Angeles. He longs for the “good old days” when business chiefs didn’t think twice about pitching in to help the city’s less fortunate.

Dominic Ng

“Today, the pressure is on for [immediate] return to shareholders,” and people running companies have to respond to shareholders who seem to “care less every year” about civic responsibility.

More young, monied tech and finance hotshots would do well to take some cues from business leaders like Ng.

Advertisement

More from L.A. Influential

Continue Reading

Business

Mark Suster: The face of L.A. venture capital

Published

on

Mark Suster: The face of L.A. venture capital

Mark Suster, photographed at the Los Angeles Times in El Segundo on Sept. 8.

Cancer-fighting robots. AI-powered baby monitors. The future of American shipbuilding.

These are the kinds of startup ideas that get Mark Suster out of bed in the morning, into his Tesla, and down to the Santa Monica offices of Upfront, the venture capital firm he joined 16 years ago.

“There’s that old saying — the future is already here, it’s just unevenly distributed,” Suster said. “My job lets me see where the world’s going five years before the general population.”

Advertisement
L.A. Influential

Discover the changemakers who are shaping every cultural corner of Los Angeles. This week we bring you The Money, a collection of bankers, political bundlers, philanthropists and others whose deep pockets give them their juice. Come back each Sunday for another installment.

But Suster, 56, didn’t become the face of the L.A. venture capital scene thanks to his day-to-day investing. He got there by throwing a party called the Upfront Summit.

Every year, Suster’s splashy tech conference takes over an iconic L.A. location. One year, it’s at the Rose Bowl. Another year, it’s at a retreat center high in the Santa Monica Mountains. There are zip lines, hot air balloons, and, among the talks with tech founders about software and product development, fireside chats with celebrities, politicians and authors (Lady Gaga, Katy Perry and Novak Djokovic graced the stage this year).

The razzle-dazzle is part of the draw, and Suster clearly relishes his role as emcee (“I was a theater kid — I still love going to the theater,” he said.)

Advertisement

‘My job lets me see where the world’s going five years before the general population.’

— Mark Suster

But the real appeal comes down to cash. Suster’s strategic move was to invite not just venture capital investors, but the people who invest in venture capital investors. Called limited partners, these are the managers of pensions, sovereign wealth funds and other giant pools of money that want to tap into the tech market. By making sure they’re on the guest list, Suster has made the summit one of the easiest places in America for fellow venture capitalists to raise a new fund.

Mark Suster

The summit loses Upfront money. When Suster started it in 2012, it cost around $300,000. In 2022, costs hit $2.3 million, Suster said, with a handful of sponsors chipping in to cut the losses. But throwing the premiere professional party in California comes with intangible benefits, like bringing in deals that would otherwise leave out Upfront and other L.A. funds and founders.

Advertisement

The 2024 party was a little scaled back, now that higher interest rates have throttled the fire hose of money that went into venture capital during the last decade. But Suster says that he welcomes the less frothy environment. “I’m having a lot more fun now,” he said, investing in founders “looking to build real businesses.”

More from L.A. Influential

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending