Business
Striking truck drivers in South Korea snarl supply chains.

A truck-driver strike in South Korea has stretched right into a seventh day, forcing the nation’s producers to reduce manufacturing and slowing site visitors at its ports.
On Monday, the nation’s Ministry of Commerce, Business and Vitality mentioned the strike had resulted in manufacturing and cargo disruptions for cars, metal and petrochemicals value 1.6 trillion received, or about $1.25 billion, over the primary six days.
The truckers’ strike is the most recent headache for a worldwide provide chain already reeling from Covid lockdowns in China and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, particularly as a result of Korean corporations are main suppliers for important elements and supplies like semiconductors and metal.
Hyundai Motors mentioned it was compelled to chop manufacturing at one among its home vegetation due to the strike. Posco, Korea’s greatest metal maker, mentioned it halted operations at some amenities as a result of it had run out of house to retailer merchandise. Hankook Tire mentioned it needed to lower day by day shipments.
The Cargo Truckers’ Solidarity Union has mentioned it requested repeatedly for safer circumstances and affordable fares however it had “no selection” however to strike when its calls for weren’t met.
Korea’s transport ministry, which is continuous to barter with the union, urged the truckers to return to work in an announcement. The federal government mentioned it will enact emergency measures together with consigning 100 cargo vans from the army and 21 autos from different native authorities businesses to hold items into main ports.
On Sunday, the Korea Enterprises Federation launched a joint assertion with 30 different enterprise business teams, together with semiconductor producers, carmakers and others demanding that the truckers name off the strike as a result of it was “inflicting huge injury to manufacturing and commerce, the spine of our economic system.”

Business
‘This is Not Normal’: Trump’s Tariffs Upend the Bond Market

The bedrock of the financial system trembled on Friday, with government bond yields rising sharply as the chaotic rollout of tariffs shook investors’ faith in the pivotal role played by the United States in the financial system.
U.S. government bonds, known as Treasuries because they are issued by the U.S. Treasury, are backed by the full faith of the American government, and the market for Treasuries has long been deemed one of the safest and most stable in the world.
But the Treasury market’s erratic behavior all week has raised fears that investors are turning against U.S. assets as President Trump’s trade war escalates.
The yield on a 10-year Treasury, which underpins corporate and consumer borrowing and is arguably the most important interest rate in the world, rose roughly 0.1 percentage points on Friday. Friday’s rise added to sharp moves throughout the week that have taken the yield on the 10-year Treasury from less than 4 percent at the end of last week to around 4.5 percent this week.
These increases may seem small, but they are large moves in the Treasury market, prompting investors to warn that Mr. Trump’s tariff policies are causing serious turmoil. It matters to consumers as well. If you have a mortgage or car loan, for example, then the interest rate you pay is related to the 10-year yield.
Ten-year treasuries are also considered a safe haven for investors during time of volatility in the stock market, but this week’s sharp rise in yields have made this market unusually perilous.
Yields move in the opposite direction to prices. So as yields have been rising unexpectedly, investors around the world that hold trillions of dollars of Treasuries are seeing their value suddenly decline.
Rising yields on the 30-year long bond have also been historic, analysts said. This bond is considered a particular refuge for pension funds and insurance companies, because they have liabilities that stretch into the future, so they need assets that match that.
“This is not normal,” Ajay Rajadhyaksha, global chairman of research at Barclays, wrote in a report on Friday. Grappling for an explanation, Mr. Rajadhyaksha pointed to speculation by Asian investors who are selling in response to tariffs, as well as the possible unwinding of highly leveraged bets in the Treasury market. “Whatever the reason, right now, bond markets are in trouble,” he said.
The yield on the 30-year Treasury bond rose 0.44 percentage points this week, trading roughly flat on Friday. The movement signaled a sharp shift in demand for the long bond. The Federal Reserve fixes a few very short-dated interest rates that then ripple out across financial markets. But the further away from the Fed’s rates you go, the less impact the central bank has.
“Once you get to the long end, they aren’t really in the picture,” said Matt Eagan, a portfolio manager at fund manager Loomis, Sayles & Company. “There are fewer natural buyers in that market. Small changes to supply and demand can lead to big swings.”
Another worrying sign this week has been the decline in the U.S. dollar, which tumbled 0.8 percent against a basket of currencies representing its major trading partners on Friday. Every currency of the group of 10 nations rose against the dollar, further pointing to a move away from U.S. assets.
A weaker dollar at the same time as government bonds and stocks are selling off is a rare combination, given the dollar’s role as the global financial system’s safe haven.
Despite the monthslong slump in the stock market, which is approaching a bear market, it was the bond market looking “queasy” that Mr. Trump said prompted him on Wednesday to pause the worst of his tariffs for most countries.
“The big risk elephant in the room is the Treasury market,” Mr. Eagan said.
For investors, the moves echoed the wild price swings from the pandemic-induced sell-off in March 2020 and before that, a bout of volatility in September 2019. Those events spooked investors and prompted rapid intervention from the Federal Reserve to stabilize the market.
This time, the Fed is in a trickier position. The inflationary effect of tariffs warrants the central bank keeping interest rates high. But it would be more supportive to financial markets and economic growth to lower interest rates, something the central bank has so far resisted doing.
On Friday, a widely watched measure of consumer sentiment fell to its lowest level in roughly three years. Expectations for where inflation will be in 12 months time soared, underscoring the Fed’s challenge.
In the meantime, this week’s chaotic implementation, then partial reprieve, on global tariffs, followed up by an escalating trade war between the U.S. and China, has left global investors unsure of relying on the Treasury market, or even the U.S. dollar, as a source of safety and stability.
Foreign investors are among the biggest holders of U.S. government debt. Japan is the largest, based on official data, with more than $1 trillion worth of U.S. Treasury debt. The next largest in China, which holds $760 billion of Treasuries, having already reduced its holdings by more than a quarter of a trillion dollars since 2021.
“WAKE UP PEOPLE,” Andrew Brenner, a veteran bond trader and head of international fixed income at National Alliance Securities, wrote in a brief email. “THIS IS FOREIGN MONEY EXITING THE TREASURY MARKET DUE TO TARIFF POLICIES.”
Some analysts and investors fear that a more rapid pace of selling by foreign investors could push U.S. Treasury yields, and with them U.S. interest rates, even higher.
“Picking fights with major trading partners who also finance your debt becomes especially risky with a wide fiscal deficit and no credible plan to rein it in,” Mr. Eagan said.
Alternatives around the world are also benefiting. Germany has recently announced plans to invest in its military, financed through new debt. The country’s bond market is seen as Europe’s benchmark and is often compared to the Treasury market. As concerns about tariffs initially took hold last week, the spread, or difference, between the yield on 10-year German bunds and 10-year Treasuries shrank, as investors sought out the U.S. haven.
That has quickly reversed.
Business
Job seekers turn to AI tools to gain a competitive edge. It can also backfire

Dani Schlarmann, a recruiter, noticed something fishy about the job applicants.
Cover letters and resumes sounded identical. Candidates embellished their experience to match the job description. On top of that, engineers were caught using artificial intelligence tools to “cheat” on live coding tests.
The California resident, who works for blockchain technology company Ava Labs, vented about his frustrations with AI on social network LinkedIn. To address the issue, Ava Labs started asking some candidates to sign an agreement that they will not use AI assistance during their interviews, he said.
“We’ve had a few people fight us back on it and say ‘we should be able to use any tool at our disposal.’ Honestly, this is not the company for you, then,” said Schlarmann, who lives in Corona. “For engineers, we pride ourselves on coding prowess and there are going to be times when the AI can’t solve something for you.”
Job seekers use AI-powered tools to help them improve their resumes, find jobs, auto apply to hundreds of roles and even provide answers on the spot during video interviews. Fueled by the popularity of AI-powered tools like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, tech giants and startups are racing ahead to release more AI features that can spit out text, code and images within seconds.
But the AI frenzy has also sparked a debate about when technology goes too far, distorting a job candidate’s true skills and experience. Faced with more competition as companies slash thousands of workers, job seekers are weighing whether to pay for AI tools that might help them land a role more quickly. Employers and recruiters are also grappling with whether job candidates should be allowed to use AI even as they embrace the technology themselves.
Julie Schweber, senior HR knowledge advisor at the Society for Human Resource Management, said employers know that job candidates could be using AI to enhance their resume or cover letter — but they don’t want people misrepresenting themselves.
“It certainly makes sense because you want a candidate that is evolving with the technology and not afraid of technology,” she said.
Some companies don’t specify whether job candidates can use AI and others do. Anthropic, a San Francisco AI startup, asks job applicants to agree they won’t use AI assistance to answer certain questions because the company wants “to be able to assess people’s genuine interest and motivations for working at Anthropic.” Amazon said that when applicable, it will ask candidates to acknowledge that they won’t use generative AI during an interview or test.
Jeremy Pihl, who became unemployed last year for the first time at 51 years old, said he has used AI tools such as ChatGPT, Swooped and 6Figr during his job search.
“If you are not leveraging AI, I promise it’s being leveraged on you,” he said.
Recruiters use AI to generate job descriptions, review or screen candidate searches, automate candidate searches and other tasks, according to SHRM.
Pihl, who previously worked as a customer success manager at Coda and a solutions engineer at Apple, is still trying to land his next role despite already applying to roughly 1,500 jobs.
AI has helped him research a potential employer and improve cover letters, but using the tools to auto apply to jobs hasn’t yielded much success, he said. Pihl, who secured a contract role but is still job hunting, said the progress he has made has been through referrals or reaching out to a hiring manager who viewed his LinkedIn profile.
“I don’t know that I would lean on it to the extent that I leaned on it in the beginning,” he said. “There’s an aspect of it where it is really helpful.”
Meanwhile, the job search is only getting more fierce. Nearly 60% of people globally will be looking for a new job in 2025 and 37% are applying to more jobs than ever before but hearing back less, according to LinkedIn research.
In March, the unemployment rate rose slightly to 4.2 % with 7.1 million people out of work, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. In February, the number of job openings reached 7.6 million, down from 8.4 million compared with the same month in 2024.
As California tech companies continue to slash payrolls, the state’s unemployment rate has been higher than the national average. In February, California’s unemployment rate was 5.4 % with more than 1 million people unemployed in the state.
Sunnyvale, Calif.-based LinkedIn has been testing AI-powered tools on its platform, including one to match candidates with jobs that are a better fit. Rohan Rajiv, head of careers products at LinkedIn, said there’s no doubt it’s taking more interviews for people to land jobs, but both recruiters and job candidates want to spend as little time as possible in the process.
“We are finally at a point where it has become realistic for us to not play the volume game, for us to actually play a really focused game,” he said.
Nearly 40% of LinkedIn Premium subscribers use AI features to improve their profile and stand out and nearly a third have used the platform’s AI-powered job search features. Most have found it helpful, according to LinkedIn.
But there are some controversial uses of AI as well. One such example: a teleprompter that provides AI-generated answers to job interview questions.
Final Round AI, which offers an AI-powered interview assistant and other tools for a subscription fee, makes the bold claim that candidates can land their next job in 30 days or less.
In some of the startup’s viral videos on social media, people are reading AI-generated answers verbatim displayed on a screen during remote mock job interviews.
Founded in 2023, the San Francisco firm said it had more than 1 million users from January to February.
Using an AI interview or coding assistant could rub some employers the wrong way, but the entrepreneurs who created the tools say they’re just trying to support job seekers who are navigating a terrible job market.
Michael Guan, chief executive and co-founder of Final Round AI, said people’s perception of AI is changing and whoever understands how to use the technology will get an edge. Inspired by the superhero Iron Man, who has an AI assistant known as J.A.R.V.I.S., Guan envisions a future where these tools will be even more intuitive.
“Imagine I have a teleprompter on my eyeglasses …,” he said. “Everybody can become Iron Man.”
Kaivan Dave, who heads marketing at Final Round AI, said that using an AI interview assistant can help candidates, some who might have language barriers, better articulate their thoughts. Even the president, he said, has used a teleprompter.
The venture capital-backed company created a billboard in San Francisco with an image of President Trump that read “Interview Confidently Like Our President. Helping America Get Back to Work 10x Faster with Final Round AI.”
“I don’t think that this is going against any type of unethical norms,” Dave said.
Using an AI interview assistant still doesn’t fly with some recruiters.
Lyndsi Okh, a San Diego resident who recruits for tech nonprofits, said she suspected a candidate interviewing for a relationship building role was reading AI-generated answers because of their speech patterns and pauses.
“Using AI to help prepare for interview questions is fine, but reading off a screen with interview responses is a total breach of trust and a big no-no for me,” she said.
Although she has nothing against the use of AI, Okh said the ones who are using it successfully are not relying on technology to replace critical thinking.
“We’re in the Wild West of AI, where it’s like no one knows what to do, and everyone’s just doing anything,” she said. “I think that it will eventually be refined.”
For now, nothing beats a response that feels personal.
Business
Autoworkers Union Chief Gives Trump’s Tariffs a Mixed Review

The head of the United Automobile Workers union voiced partial support on Thursday for the Trump administration’s tariffs, saying targeted duties on other countries could help bring some manufacturing jobs back to the United States.
But the union’s president, Shawn Fain, described President Trump’s across-the-board global tariffs as “reckless.” In an address to U.A.W. members that was streamed on YouTube and other social media, he also strongly criticized the administration for firing federal workers and slashing key government agencies, and accused it of violating the civil rights of students and others.
“We support use of some tariffs on automotive manufacturing and similar industries. We do not support tariffs for political games about immigration or fentanyl,” Mr. Fain said. “We do not support reckless tariffs on all countries at crazy rates.”
The address appeared aimed at distancing the union leader from Mr. Trump. In previous weeks, Mr. Fain praised the White House’s tariff plans and faced some criticism for moving closer to an administration that often shows hostility to organized labor. He campaigned frequently and enthusiastically last year for former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, often rousing crowds by referring to Mr. Trump as a “scab.”
“We are not aligning everything we do with the Trump administration,” Mr. Fain said on Thursday. “We are negotiating with the Trump administration.”
Mr. Fain used the address to repeat familiar claims that free trade agreements — in particular, the North American Free Trade Agreement — allowed corporations to move U.S. factories and jobs to low-wage countries. He said some 90,000 factories in the United States closed in the last 30 years, hollowing out once thriving manufacturing cities like Flint, Mich., and Gary, Ind.
While he blamed both Democrats and Republicans for supporting policies that have hurt U.S. manufacturing, Mr. Fain said the resulting “pain and anger” had led many workers who traditionally supported Democrats to gravitate toward Mr. Trump.
“We have to end this free trade disaster, and we don’t care whether it’s a Republican or Democrat who does it,” he said.
Mr. Fain said that General Motors, Ford Motor and Stellantis had excess manufacturing capacity in their U.S. plants and could create thousands of auto assembly jobs by making full use of them.
He added that he disagreed with “90 percent of what the Trump administration is doing,” especially the cuts at the National Institutes of Health that have disrupted research into cancer and other diseases.
“We’ve seen the destruction of bargaining rights for one million federal workers. We’ve seen an attack on the National Labor Relations Board and the illegal firing of a board member,” he said. “We’ve seen the attacks on Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid, programs that millions in the working class depending on.”
Mr. Fain did not mention Elon Musk, who as an adviser to Mr. Trump has been leading efforts to fire tens of thousands of federal workers and to make deep cuts at agencies including the Department of Education and Department of Veterans Affairs. Mr. Musk, the chief executive of Tesla, has strongly opposed U.A.W. efforts to organize Tesla’s workers in the United States.
Mr. Fain noted that Mahmoud Khalil, the recent Columbia University graduate who was arrested by federal immigration agents last month, had once been a student instructor represented by the U.A.W. Grant Miner, a graduate student who was expelled by the university last month, is president of U.A.W. Local 2710, which represents Columbia student workers.
-
News1 week ago
Supreme Court Rules Against Makers of Flavored Vapes Popular With Teens
-
News1 week ago
NYC Mayor Eric Adams' corruption case is dismissed
-
Technology1 week ago
Here’s how you can preorder the Nintendo Switch 2 (or try to)
-
News1 week ago
Trump to Pick Ohio Solicitor General, T. Elliot Gaiser, for Justice Dept. Legal Post
-
Politics1 week ago
FBI flooded with record number of new agent applications in Kash Patel's first month leading bureau
-
World1 week ago
‘A historic moment’: Donald Trump unveils sweeping ‘reciprocal’ tariffs
-
Sports1 week ago
Deion Sanders defied doubters and returns to Colorado with a $10M per year deal. What’s next?
-
World1 week ago
Commission denies singling out NGOs in green funding row