News-Tribune, June 22, 1926

More Duluthians cast votes in yesterday’s primary election than in any primary in the city’s history. Statewide, the “wets” had their day, with M.J. Maas of St. Paul, a “light wine and beer” candidate, appearing victorious in the 4th Congressional District, and W.A. Pittenger of Duluth, similarly regarded as a “wet,” taking a commanding lead in the 8th.

News-Tribune, June 22, 1956

Following the deaths of a pilot and eight civilians in a crash in a residential area near Wold Chamberlain Field in Minneapolis, Duluth Mayor Eugene Lambert filed a request with the U.S. Air Force and Navy that jet training operations be transferred to Duluth, where congestion is less of a problem.

News-Tribune, June 22, 1976

Ralph Nader named Duluth environmentalist Arlene Lehto one of America’s five “unsung heroines” for her contributions to pollution abatement. Lehto in 1969 organized the Save Lake Superior Association to fight pollution in the lake.

News Tribune, June 22, 2006

Duluth City Councilor Russ Stewart will present an ordinance to the council that extends the city’s existing standards for adult bookstores to adult entertainment. The move would allow the 62-year-old Club Saratoga to continue operation in the face of a state law prohibiting strip clubs within 500 feet of a residence or within 2,800 feet of churches and schools.

Barrett Chase has been web editor for the News Tribune since 2015. You can email him at bchase@duluthnews.com or call him at 218-723-5310.

Federal prosecutors are continuing to dismiss charges initially brought against people in Minnesota for allegedly assaulting federal officers during the winter. 

WCCO dug through court filings and identified at least 18 people whose cases are now dropped. A federal judge officially dismissed the charges for 15 of them; three are pending a judge’s approval after prosecutors filed motions to dismiss the charges. At least 17 cases are still pending, with judges denying defense dismissal motions in several of them. 

Richard Painter, a legal expert with the University of Minnesota and former chief White House ethics lawyer for President George W. Bush, said that it’s clear to him that federal prosecutors brought several cases forward without sufficient evidence. 

“It appears that the United States Attorney’s Office in Minnesota is bringing some weak cases against protestors,” Painter said, adding that he believes that there was pressure from the Trump administration to charge people. 

According to court records, defense and government attorneys alike asked for case dismissals for a variety of reasons. 

Juan Carlos Rodriguez Romero was accused in December of ramming into ICE vehicles in St. Paul, prompting an ICE agent to fire his weapon, hitting no one. On June 8, United States Attorney Daniel Rosen signed off on a dismissal motion based in part because prosecutors “thoroughly reassessed the evidence” and concluded that they were not confident that they could obtain and sustain a conviction against Rodriguez Romero. 

In January, ICE leadership acknowledged that ICE agent Christian Castro may have lied under oath about what happened the night he shot Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis in north Minneapolis. This led to the assault charges against Sosa-Celis and another man being dropped; Castro is now facing charges in Hennepin County for the shooting and for falsely reporting a crime.

Just a week after that incident, federal officers said Paul Johnson violently resisted arrest in north Minneapolis. On Thursday, Rosen signed a motion to dismiss the charges against Johnson. The U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota acknowledged issues raised by Johnson and his legal team, including allegations that agents shackled him to a bed at HCMC without access to his phone for days. 

“Based on newly received discovery, the government intends to pursue an investigation into allegations raised in Mr. Johnson’s filings; therefore the interests of justice support dismissal of this case,” Rosen’s motion reads in Johnson’s case. 

In the more than 30 cases WCCO reviewed, one name appeared across a variety of different cases. HSI Special Agent Richard Berger submitted sworn affidavits prompting probable cause for the arrest of Johnson and nine others, whose charges were ultimately dismissed. Berger submitted affidavits in at least 12 cases that are still ongoing. 

In a hearing in Gillian Etherington’s case in April, which is still ongoing, U.S. District Court Magistrate David Schultz said that he became “concerned with the veracity” of multiple affidavits related to federal officer assault cases that came from Berger. Schultz said that in multiple instances, Berger “did not have any personal knowledge of the events described in the affidavits that he has submitted to this court as sworn affidavits.”

A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security ignored questions from WCCO about whether there has been an internal review of incident reports or legal filings. The spokesperson instead provided a statement describing Johnson, who prosecutors are dropping the federal case against, as an “anti-ICE rioter.” 

U.S. prosecutors in Minnesota on Tuesday announced charges against 15 people they say conspired to “violently oppose immigration law enforcement,” though Rosen failed to describe a single example of injuries to federal agents when repeatedly questioned.

When asked what makes the latest slate of indictments different than other cases that have been dropped, Rosen said he doesn’t think any cases have “failed in any way.”

“Read the indictment and you’ll understand the magnitude of this case,” Rosen said. “You watch how this case plays out, you watch how the evidence plays out and the evidence will prove it all out.”

Minnesota is banning crypto ATMs after scammers reportedly used the machines to drain nearly $1 million from residents over the past few years. The machines, also called cryptocurrency kiosks, let people turn cash into digital currency quickly. That speed has made them a favorite tool for criminals who pressure victims during fake emergencies, legal threats and romance scams.

The ban takes effect Aug. 1, 2026. Operators must remove publicly accessible machines by the end of the year. State officials say scammers have used these kiosks to turn panic into payments. A victim gets a frightening call, heads to a machine and sends cash before anyone has time to step in. That quick window is exactly what criminals count on and what Minnesota wants to stop.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

• Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
• For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
• Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join. 

TEXT JOB SCAM COST HIM $10K IN CRYPTO

Minnesota crypto ATM ban targets fast-moving scams

Between 2023 and 2025, Minnesota logged 134 complaints involving crypto kiosk scams. Reported losses came close to $1 million. In 2025 alone, the state reportedly saw 70 cases and more than $540,000 in losses. Those numbers likely tell only part of the story. Many victims never report what happened. Some feel embarrassed. Others worry their family will judge them. Scammers know that silence helps them move on to the next target.

Minnesota had already tried adding safeguards to these machines. The state required warnings, limits and consumer protections. Yet law enforcement officials said scammers adjusted. They stayed on the phone with victims, coached them through the screens and told them what to say if anyone asked questions. Now, Minnesota is taking a much stronger step by removing the machines from public use.

Why crypto ATM scams are so hard to undo

Crypto kiosks create a dangerous mix for scam victims. They accept cash, move money quickly and usually leave very little room for recovery once the transaction goes through. With a bank transfer or credit card payment, there may be some chance to pause, dispute or trace the money. Crypto works differently. Once the digital currency leaves the wallet, the transfer can move across borders or through multiple wallets before anyone knows what happened.

That leaves victims in a brutal position. They may realize the call was fake only minutes after sending the money. By then, the cash has already been converted to crypto, and the scammer has likely moved it again. That is why scammers love these machines. They do not need to hack your bank account. They only need to scare you enough to follow their instructions. 

HOW FLORIDA RETIREE LOST $200K IN FAKE PAYPAL REFUND SCAM

How crypto ATM scams trap victims

Most crypto ATM scams begin with pressure. The caller may claim you missed jury duty and face arrest. Another scammer may pretend your grandchild caused an accident and needs bail money. Someone posing as a bank employee may say your account is under attack and your money needs to be “protected.” The story changes, but the pressure feels the same. The scammer wants you scared, rushed and alone.

Then comes the payment demand. You may be told to withdraw cash and drive to a nearby crypto kiosk. The scammer may text you a QR code or wallet address. They may stay on the phone the entire time and tell you to ignore warnings on the screen. That last part is key. Many victims do see alerts. They still move forward because the scammer has created fear and urgency. In that moment, the warning on the machine has to compete with someone shouting that a loved one is in trouble or that police are on the way.

Real crypto scam cases show how fast money can disappear

We have seen this pattern before. The scam starts with a believable story, then the pressure builds until the victim feels there is no time to think.

Gail Barr lost $9,260 after scammers convinced her she had missed jury duty. They sent her to a Bitcoin ATM inside a convenience store and kept her on the phone while she followed their instructions. Thankfully, a bank manager later helped stop the scam from getting worse.

Then there was the 85-year-old man who lost $200,000 after a fake PayPal refund scheme pulled him into a much bigger trap. What began as a $10,000 crypto ATM transfer eventually turned into gold coins handed to a courier.

And in another scam, Joe Allen, a disabled man from Connecticut, shared how he lost more than $300,000 in a cryptocurrency investment scam. His story shows how criminals keep working someone once they sense fear, trust or isolation.

That is what makes these scams so dangerous. Most victims do not start out thinking they are sending money to a criminal. They believe they are solving a crisis, protecting their account or helping someone they care about. By the time the truth sinks in, the money may already be gone.

Crypto ATM scam losses are rising nationwide

Minnesota is hardly alone. The FBI says its Internet Crime Complaint Center received more than 13,400 complaints in 2025 involving cryptocurrency kiosks. Reported losses topped $388 million. More than half of those complaints involved people over 50, with losses above $302 million.

That age pattern should make every family pay attention. Older adults may have savings. They may answer calls from unknown numbers more often. They may also have a deep instinct to help a child or grandchild in trouble. Scammers weaponize that instinct.

The machine is only one part of the scam. The real attack happens in the victim’s head. Once fear takes over, even careful people can make a decision they would never make on a calm day.

1 CLICK COST A FATHER $4 MILLION IN BITCOIN TO VISHING SCAMMERS

Minnesota’s crypto ATM ban could influence other states

Minnesota is drawing a line in the sand around one part of the crypto world that has become a real problem for scam victims: the public kiosk. People in the state will still be able to use regulated online platforms to buy and sell cryptocurrency. What is going away are the machines that let a frightened person walk into a store, feed in cash and send crypto while a scammer talks them through every tap.

Other states will likely be watching what happens next. If Minnesota’s ban cuts down on reported losses, lawmakers elsewhere may face more pressure to take a closer look at crypto kiosks in gas stations, convenience stores and shopping centers.

Supporters of the ban say that matters because these kiosks have become too easy for criminals to abuse. Critics say the machines have legitimate uses, and scammers will simply move to another payment method. That may be true. Scammers always look for the next opening. But Minnesota is betting that removing one of the fastest cash-to-crypto routes will slow the scam down enough for some victims to stop, question the story and keep their money.

Tips to avoid crypto ATM scams

The best way to protect yourself is to slow the moment down before fear turns into a payment you cannot easily reverse.

1) Hang up when someone demands crypto

No real police department, court, government agency or bank will demand payment through a crypto ATM. A legitimate company will not tell you to protect your account by feeding cash into a kiosk. If someone demands crypto, end the call. Do not debate. Do not explain. Hang up and contact the person or agency through a number you find yourself.

2) Verify the emergency before sending money

Scammers often claim a loved one is hurt, arrested or stranded. That story is designed to short-circuit your judgment. Call the person directly. If they do not answer, call another family member. A few minutes of checking can save thousands of dollars. A family code word can also help. Pick a phrase that would never appear on social media. If someone claims to be a loved one in trouble, ask for the code word before you do anything.

3) Reduce the personal info scammers can use against you

Scammers often sound convincing because they already know something about you or your family. That information can come from people-search sites, data brokers, old breaches or public records. Consider using a data removal service to reduce how much personal information is floating around online. Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting Cyberguy.com

4) Watch for coaching at the machine

If someone tells you what to tap, what to ignore or what to say if a clerk asks questions, you are likely in the middle of a scam. That coaching is a major red flag. Scammers know store employees and bank workers may spot the danger. So they prepare victims with cover stories before anyone can intervene.

 5) Use strong antivirus software to block scam links

Some crypto scams start with a fake support page, phishing link or malicious download. Strong antivirus software can help block dangerous sites and files before they pull you into a scam. Get my picks for the best 2026 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android & iOS devices at Cyberguy.com

6) Talk to your bank before withdrawing cash

Large cash withdrawals should trigger a pause. Tell your bank what happened before you leave with the money. Bank employees see these scams often. In some cases, one question from a teller or manager can break through the fear and stop the loss.

7) Consider identity theft protection after a scam

If you have already sent money or shared sensitive information, identity theft protection can help monitor for new account fraud and alert you to suspicious activity. See my tips and best picks on Best Identity Theft Protection at Cyberguy.com

8) Report the scam quickly

If you sent money through a crypto kiosk, report it right away. Contact local police, your state consumer protection office and the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center at IC3.gov. The FBI says IC3 is its main intake form for cyber-enabled fraud and scams, even if you are unsure whether your complaint qualifies. Fast reporting may help investigators spot patterns and warn others before the same scam hits another family.

Watch the CyberGuy Live replay: Lock Down Your Phone in 30 Minutes

Your phone holds your email, passwords, photos, banking apps and personal data. In this free CyberGuy Live replay, Kurt the CyberGuy walks you step by step through simple phone security fixes you can do at your own pace. You’ll learn how to improve your privacy settings, spot the latest phone scams, use trusted security tools and walk away with a simple checklist to stay protected. Watch the replay and get our checklist here: CyberGuyLive.com

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Kurt’s key takeaways

Minnesota’s crypto ATM ban gets at something every family should be paying attention to. These scams move fast because they are built around fear. One scary phone call, one trip to a kiosk and money that took years to save can be gone in minutes. That to me is the part that hits hardest. Most victims do not think they are sending money to a criminal. They think they are helping a loved one, avoiding arrest or protecting their bank account. So here is the takeaway. If someone tells you to send crypto, keep it secret or stay on the phone while you move money, stop right there. Hang up, call someone you trust and verify the story before fear makes the decision for you.

Would you support a crypto ATM ban in your state, or should people still have access to the machines with stronger safeguards? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

• Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
• For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
• Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.