Connect with us

Colorado

Colorado River states have just weeks to strike a deal. Here’s why it’s so hard for them to agree.

Published

on

Colorado River states have just weeks to strike a deal. Here’s why it’s so hard for them to agree.


Each negotiator drew a card from the deck.

John Entsminger, from Nevada, picked the highest card: the ace. Gene Shawcroft, from Utah drew the lowest: an eight.

“My luck in Las Vegas isn’t very good,” Shawcroft said, holding up his card to show an audience of 1,700 people. They chuckled under the ornate chandeliers of a Caesars Palace ballroom.

Shawcroft, Entsminger and the five other negotiators from the states in the Colorado River Basin were picking cards to determine the speaking order for the final panel of the Colorado River Water Users Association conference in Las Vegas in mid-December.

Advertisement

While the stakes for that card draw were quite low, the stakes of what the seven states are negotiating couldn’t be much higher.

(Brooke Larsen | The Salt Lake Tribune) Gene Shawcroft, Utah’s Colorado River commissioner, speaks on a panel of state negotiators at the Colorado River Water Users conference in Las Vegas on Thursday, Dec. 18, 2025. Negotiators picked from a deck of cards to determine the speaking order. Shawcroft chose the lowest card, so he went first.

The Colorado River is the lifeblood of the American Southwest and northern Mexico. Cities, tribes, farms, fish and various industries rely on it for drinking water, irrigation, habitat, power and more.

But it has been overtapped. And as the region gets hotter and drier and populations continue to boom, there is less and less water to go around.

The states have struggled to agree on how to share the river. Politics, different experiences of the river, complicated regulations and dwindling water supplies make negotiations difficult.

Advertisement

On the last day of the conference, state negotiators tried to appear cordial and close to consensus, even making light of the tension.

“It’s an honor and pleasure to be here today alongside my Colorado River family,” Becky Mitchell, Colorado’s negotiator, said. “As you all know, sometimes you can’t pick your family, but you get through it anyways.” The audience roared in laughter.

Differences quickly surfaced, though, and states didn’t appear close to reaching a deal.

The clock is ticking: The seven basin states only have until February 14 to come up with a plan for how to manage the river in dry times. The current guidelines expire at the end of the year. If they test their luck and fail to reach an agreement, they risk the Interior Department making a plan for them or years of litigation.

The seven state negotiators are meeting for four days in Salt Lake City this week as they work to hash out a deal before that deadline, according to Becki Bryant, public affairs officer with the Bureau of Reclamation.

Advertisement

The bureau released a draft environmental impact statement on Friday that lays out a series of pathways to manage the river system and its major reservoirs. If the states reach a deal, the bureau says it will insert that plan as the preferred way forward, Scott Cameron, acting commissioner for the bureau, told The Tribune at the conference. If states can’t agree, the federal government will choose an alternative itself, he added.

(Brooke Larsen | The Salt Lake Tribune) Scott Cameron, acting commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, addresses a large audience at the Colorado River Water Users Association conference in Las Vegas on Wednesday, Dec. 17, 2025. He emphasized the urgent need for states to reach a deal on the future management of the river.

In this game of water diplomacy, there will likely be no clear winners. “No one is too big to fail,” said Becky Mitchell, Colorado’s negotiator.

Federal officials say sacrifices must be made going forward.

“That means being willing to make and adhere to uncomfortable compromises,” Cameron said.

Advertisement

Whether states are willing to give enough to seal a deal is yet to be seen.

Is hydrology the problem?

Throughout the conference, anxiety about drought and the abnormally warm start to winter hung over panel discussions and side conversations in hallways lined with velvet curtains colored terracotta, like the Colorado River after a big storm.

October brought heavy rains, but November and December were abnormally warm and dry. Snowpack in the Upper Colorado River Basin is at its lowest level in a quarter century, according to the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center.

Lake Powell is only 28% full and could drop below 3,490 feet next year, according to forecasts from the Bureau of Reclamation. At that level, water would be unable to pass through Glen Canyon Dam’s electricity-generating turbines.

(Christopher Cherrington | The Salt Lake Tribune)

Advertisement

The drought has been blamed for the stagnation in the negotiations. “We need to remember that hydrology is the problem,” Brandon Gebhart, Wyoming’s negotiator, said. “It’s not political positions. It’s not legal interpretations. It’s not one state.”

Low reservoirs mean less water storage to prop up the river system when flows are low.

“Without that resiliency, people are very risk averse, very concerned about every acre-foot, so the give and take becomes very difficult,” Chuck Cullom, director of the Upper Colorado River Commission and former Colorado River programs manager in Arizona, told The Tribune.

When the seven states established guidelines for how to manage the river during dry years in 2007, drought had begun to plague the basin. But there was a much greater storage buffer then.

“The 2007 guidelines started with Lake Powell and Lake Mead, the two largest reservoirs in the United States, at about 90% capacity,” Cullom said. Today, the combined contents of Powell and Mead is closer to 30% full, he added.

Advertisement

Even with additional deals in 2019 and 2023 that led to sharp reductions in water use in the Lower Basin, the water crisis has continued to worsen, and climate scientists have said that trend will continue.

“We haven’t really got much of a break hydrologically, but this is something that has been foreseeable for a very long time,” Sarah Porter, director of the Kyl Center for Water Policy at Arizona State University, told The Tribune in November.

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) The bathtub ring is visible at Lake Powell near Ticaboo, Utah on Tuesday, Oct. 17, 2023.

Some at the conference argued leaders need to stop blaming the stalemate on the river’s flow.

“Water is life, and like all of nature, the river is inherently chaotic,” Kirin Vicenti, water commissioner for the Jicarilla Apache Nation, said. “Despite those that think hydrology is the problem, it’s not, and it can’t always be the scapegoat. Our planning and policies must allow for flexibility and innovative and dynamic solutions.”

Advertisement

A ‘very technical’ disagreement

The basin states are working to come to terms that will provide more flexibility in river management during dry years.

The Upper Basin states — Utah, Colorado, New Mexico and Wyoming — have been at odds with the Lower Basin — Arizona, California and Nevada — over how to divvy up and enforce water cuts, though.

That’s in part due to different interpretations of the Upper Basin states’ obligation to the Lower Basin under the Colorado River Compact established over a century ago.

“This is a very technical, nerdy, hydrological disagreement,” Porter told The Tribune after the conference.

If a rolling average of 7.5 million acre-feet of water doesn’t make it past Lee’s Ferry, just below Glen Canyon Dam, over a ten year period, Lower Basin states may sue the Upper Basin.

Advertisement

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) Glen Canyon Dam in Page, Ariz., on Monday, May 19, 2025.

State negotiators want to avoid litigation and may include protections against that in their deal. But so far, states have not found enough common ground.

Tom Buschatzke, Arizona’s negotiator said he needs the Upper Basin to make conservation commitments that are “verifiable and mandatory.” To sign on to a deal, Buschatzke has to get a deal approved by his state legislature, an “additional burden” unique to Arizona, Porter said.

The Upper Basin negotiators said demands for mandatory cuts from their water users ignores the realities of how water is managed and flows through their states.

‘Different experience of the river’

Across much of Utah, Colorado River water is often known by a different name locally: Ashley Creek, Price River, Escalante River, Rock Creek. Dozens of smaller waterways flow through the mountains and canyons of Utah to major tributaries like the Green and San Juan Rivers, before dumping into the Colorado in the southeast corner of the state.

Advertisement

The flow in those lesser creeks and rivers fluctuate day to day, year to year, based on snowpack, creating a variable water supply across Utah and other Upper Basin states.

Some reservoirs, such as Strawberry and Scofield, exist along the journey to store water for drinking water and irrigation. But those human-made lakes pale in comparison to the nation’s largest reservoir, Lake Mead, that the Lower Basin relies on for water delivery.

“That very different experience of the river and water supply makes it hard for people to find common ground because there’s not a lot of common experience,” Cullom said.

(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) The San Juan River, a tributary of the Colorado River, near Mexican Hat, on Friday, May 27, 2022.

Beyond just differences in storage and water availability, the Secretary of the Interior has much greater powers in the Lower Basin thanks to a 1964 Supreme Court ruling that deemed the secretary the “water master” of the river below Lake Mead.

Advertisement

“The secretary could go to water users in the Lower Basin and say, ‘There’s an existential crisis. I’m going to cut you off.’ The secretary does not have that authority in the Upper Basin,” Cullom said.

‘We’re all on the same rowboat’

Entsminger, the Nevada negotiator, spoke last on the final panel at the Colorado River Water Users Association conference — a reward for drawing the ace.

He kept it short and pointed at his fellow negotiators.

“If you distill down what my six partners just said, I believe there’s three common things: Here’s all the great things my state has done. Here’s how hard, slash impossible, it is to do any more. And here are all the reasons why other people should have to do more,” he said. “As long as we keep polishing those arguments and repeating them to each other, we are going nowhere.”

Entsminger closed his speech, and the largest Colorado River conference of the year, with a metaphorical warning for any negotiator that holds a hard line.

Advertisement

“We’re all on the same rowboat,” he said. “The first one to fire a shot puts a hole in the boat and sinks it.”

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) A raft on the Colorado River as seen from Navajo Bridge in Ariz. on Tuesday, May 20, 2025.

This article is published through the Colorado River Collaborative, a solutions journalism initiative supported by the Janet Quinney Lawson Institute for Land, Water, and Air at Utah State University. See all of our stories about how Utahns are impacted by the Colorado River at greatsaltlakenews.org/coloradoriver.



Source link

Advertisement

Colorado

Colorado breweries warn new tax hike bills could lead to more small business closures, job losses

Published

on

Colorado breweries warn new tax hike bills could lead to more small business closures, job losses


A bartender pours a beer at a bar in Summit County on Thursday, Feb. 29, 2024. A new bill intended to provide funds for alcohol-related addiction prevention, treatment and recovery programs could cost small breweries and wineries up to 160% in taxes and fees.
Andrew Maciejewski/Summit Daily News

Colorado brewers are raising red flags over new bills that could increase taxes and fees on small alcohol businesses, many of which are already struggling to keep their doors open.

House Bill 1271, known as the Alcohol Impact & Recovery Enterprises bill, creates three government-run enterprises designed to fund programs for alcohol-related addiction prevention, treatment and recovery programs — all funded through fees imposed on alcoholic beverages. The bill is sponsored by four Democratic lawmakers.

Colorado per capita alcohol consumption is higher than the national average. The state also has one of the higher alcohol-related death rates in the country, with around 24 deaths per 100,000 residents as of 2023, according to data from Trust for America’s Health. 



Data from the Colorado Health Institute shows not everyone who could benefit from treatment for alcohol use disorders currently receives it, largely due to factors like cost, accessibility and stigma.

Advertisement

Were the bill to pass, manufacturers and wholesale distributors would have to pay five cents in fees per gallon of beer, cider and apple wine, seven cents per liter of wine and 35 cents per liter of spirits to be used toward alcohol-related treatment and recovery programs. As state lawmakers plan cuts to balance a $850 million budget deficit, advocates for these programs argue the funding from the bill could help offset any potential losses.



For local breweries and wineries in the mountains, however, this would be a significant financial blow to an already struggling industry.

“This is not the time for us to be implementing new taxes on an industry that is hurting right now,” said Carlin Walsh, owner of Elevation Beer Company and chair of the Colorado Brewers Guild. “As a brewer, I feel like the state is looking a gift horse in the mouth.”

Beer, wine, cider and spirits generate around $22 billion in economic activity for Colorado, according to the Colorado Beverage Coalition. The state is home to nearly 420 breweries, 145 wineries, nearly 20 cideries and 100 distilleries. 

Faced with rising costs and waning appetites, however, over 100 Colorado breweries have shuttered their doors since 2024, marking the first time since 2005 that more breweries closed than opened. Meanwhile, national surveys confirmed alcohol consumption in the U.S. is at a 90-year low.

Advertisement

Walsh said breweries already pay eight cents per gallon in taxes, which for a company like Elevation translates to roughly $30,000 in taxes annually. Fees from the new bill would add another $12,000 to its yearly expenses.

“The alcohol industry at large is one of the most regulated industries in the United States, period. We already pay a very heavy tax,” Walsh said, adding that breweries provide tens of millions of dollars to Colorado’s general fund. “Our position is that there’s already money available. Those dollars go to the general fund, and it’s really up to the state to manage what we already provide and to decide what is their priority. We don’t feel like it should be on our shoulders to increase the amount that we pay to the state just because the state wants to endeavour on new programs.”

The Colorado Beverage Coalition said the imposed fees would be a 60% cost increase on alcohol businesses. Paired with an estimated 100% increase in taxes from a referred ballot measure proposed last week — House Bill 1301 — the impacts would be disastrous for the industry, Walsh said.

House Bill 1301 would refer a measure to the November ballot that would increase excise taxes on alcohol and increase sales and excise taxes on marijuana in order to fund a mental health hospital in Aurora.

“Our brewery and so many other breweries, we just don’t have capacity for that. We’re already a low margin business to begin with,” Walsh said. “If this happens, this is going to drive further consolidation amongst our members. It’s going to drive further closures.”

Advertisement

Larger alcohol companies may be in a better position to absorb some of the costs from increased fees, said Shawnee Adelson, executive director for the Colorado Brewers Guild. Small businesses in rural resort markets, on the other hand, are not in that position.

“At a certain point when costs just keep going up and up and up, there’s no more place to cut,” Adelson said.

Colorado jobs, tourism could see ripple effects

The Colorado Beverage Coalition estimates House Bill 1271 could impact several of the 131,000 brewery, winery and distillery jobs in the state.

The Colorado Beverage Coalition estimates House Bill 1271 would jeopardize 131,000 brewery, winery and distillery jobs in the state, in addition to “greatly increasing cost on consumers.” Walsh said an average brewery would “no doubt” have to cut jobs if either, or both, bills were to pass.

“Depending on the size of a brewery, it could be the cost of a full-time staff or multiple full-time staff to cover the cost of these (fees), so there is a real concern about job losses due to increased costs,” Adelson added.

The Colorado Distillers Guild also argues the bill would be a blow to the tourism industry, as visitors could be deterred by increased consumer costs and a dwindling beer culture.

“A lot of (breweries) will either have to absorb that cost or pass it on to the consumer. And right now, in the current state of the economy, we understand that a lot of consumers are price conscious right now, which is also contributing to lower consumption,” Adelson said. “Passing on that price is going to be really hard for consumers to swallow as well.”

Advertisement

The bill is not entirely new, as similar legislation by the same name was proposed in 2024. The original bill, which died in committee, received significant pushback from Gov. Jared Polis due to concerns that it would end up raising prices for consumers. Polis also requested that sponsors exempt beer companies from the fees.

Aside from a stakeholder meeting ahead of the bill’s introduction, Adelson said the Colorado Brewers Guild had not been contacted by lawmakers about the plan for an excise fee increase.

“We’ve had two years to sit down and have discussions with lawmakers about this. Nobody has reached out. Nobody has sat down with us to say, ‘Hey, this is our goal. We wanna get this done. How can you guys meet us halfway?’” Walsh said.

Being an enterprise fee rather than a tax, House Bill 1271 would not go to voters for approval. Instead, the change would be implemented through legislation only and automatically go live in July 2027. Because the bill would create three separate enterprise fees for beer, wine and spirits — each capped at $20 million annually per state law — the state could collect up to $60 million from all three.

The bill would also create a new 11-member board appointed by the governor to oversee the three enterprises, which would be made up of alcohol industry representatives, behavioral health professionals, public health experts and individuals in recovery.

Advertisement

On top of feeling that a financial change of that magnitude should be left up to voters, Walsh said he’s heard from businesses that are concerned about the potential for the board to increase fees in the future.

“There are very few guard rails around how this enterprise can operate, including the ability for them to raise the tax price that we’re currently paying. There’s very few restrictions within this bill that control how much they can increase that tax,” Walsh said. “In two years they could come back and say, ‘Oh we’re going to increase it another five cents or 10 cents.’”

For Adelson, the fees would impact more than just manufacturing facilities and business  operations.

“They’re community gathering spaces and they’re third places,” Adelson said. “They give back a lot and so I think I just want to make sure that the consumer realizes that we’re not just talking about production facilities, but your local neighborhood brewery that’s down the street and that your neighbours own or your friends work at.”

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

New affordable housing communities in Colorado aim to serve families with the greatest need

Published

on

New affordable housing communities in Colorado aim to serve families with the greatest need


LONGMONT, Colo. — For Skye Beck and her husband, the decision to uproot their family of five from Nebraska and relocate to Colorado for a new job wasn’t easy — especially when it came to the cost of living.

“It was looking like it maybe was not going to be an affordable option for us to come out here,” she said. “We did find one eventually, but it was still just the two-bedroom apartment, and that was just a little tight for us for the year.”

After a year of cramped living, the Beck family moved into a much more spacious apartment at Ascent at Hover Crossing in Longmont. The newest affordable housing development in Boulder County, which officially opened its doors on Tuesday, includes four-bedroom units — a rarity in affordable housing.

“I think they only have six of those [units],” said Beck. “To have that much space for the five of us is a blessing.”

Advertisement

Katie Pung, housing development project manager for the City of Longmont, said the larger units were a deliberate priority.

“Having those larger units for families really came together in a way that we feel like is going to be meaningful for Longmont families,” Pung said.

The mixed-income apartments are available for a variety of incomes, with units ranging from 30% to 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) — about $31,650 to $84,400 for a one-person household.

The development also includes an early childhood education (ECE) center on site, giving families an affordable childcare option.

OUR Center, a longtime local nonprofit specializing in subsidized early education for low-income families, will operate the center. The facility is set to open later this year, with availability for both residents and the broader Longmont community.

Advertisement

It reflects a growing statewide push to incorporate childcare into housing projects through state funding and technical assistance for developers.

p2-aff-housing-projects_030326AKB.mp4

A similar effort is underway in Denver’s Berkeley neighborhood, where the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless is partnering with the Denver Housing Authority to develop Charity’s House, a family housing development with 135 new units — also with an on-site child care center.

Advertisement

At least 40% of the units will be reserved for families earning 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI) — currently $37,850 for a family of three and $42,050 for a family of four in Denver. All units will be income-restricted to those at or below 60% AMI.

Cathy Alderman, chief communications and public policy officer for the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, said land partnerships help reduce both cost and construction time.

“If we can enter into a partnership with another organization that owns land, and we can build on that, that cuts our cost and time down considerably,” Alderman said.

The DHA Delivers for Denver (D3) bond program, a partnership between DHA and the City of Denver, has funded 11 property acquisitions since its inception in 2019, according to Denver Housing Authority Chief Real Estate Officer Erin Clark.

“It is public partnerships like that and public-private partnerships that, even us, working with a nonprofit here, that are what deliver more housing across the community,” said Clark. “It’s just people thinking outside of the box and leveraging resources and saying, ‘What do you do best, and what do we do best, and how can we work together to make all this happen?’”

Advertisement

Construction is slated to begin in late 2027.

Denver7 has heard from multiple experts through the years about the lack of affordable housing options for families and seniors.

Years-long waitlists and housing lottery odds often make it tougher. More than 15,000 children and youth are currently experiencing homelessness in Denver.

Colorado has been making significant housing investments since the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to more affordable housing developments across the state. But Alderman said there is still more work to be done.

“My biggest concern is that not all of that housing is being targeted for those households in the greatest need,” Alderman said.

Advertisement

Longtime Longmont resident Karen Howerton remembers a time when rents hovered in the $600 range.

“When I came back to Longmont six years ago, I was surprised at how much inflation had happened here and how big the town had grown,” she said.

The last affordable housing development she lived in didn’t quite fit all her needs.

Now, she joins the Becks as one of the first tenants at Ascent at Hover Crossing.

“What I wanted to come over here for was a washer and dryer — I didn’t have that at my other place — and the little balcony, you know,” she said. “I’ve met a few of the neighbors already, and I can’t say enough about it. It’s just a great place to be, for sure.”

Advertisement

Howerton and Beck say the little comforts go a long way toward making a place feel like home.

“I mean, everyone deserves to have a space and be able to afford it without worrying about all the other parts of life,” Beck said. “I feel like here we’re able to finally rest a bit and able to enjoy life, but it shouldn’t be limited to just a waitlist.”

Coloradans making a difference | Denver7 featured videos


Denver7 is committed to making a difference in our community by standing up for what’s right, listening, lending a helping hand and following through on promises. See that work in action, in the videos above.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado weather: Up to 14 inches of snow forecast for mountains

Published

on

Colorado weather: Up to 14 inches of snow forecast for mountains


Snow started Monday night in Colorado’s mountains and will continue throughout the week, likely making its way into the Denver area on Friday, according to the National Weather Service.

Colorado’s mountain roads, including Interstate 70 at the Eisenhower-Johnson Tunnel and Berthoud Pass, were already snow-covered Tuesday morning, according to the weather service.

“With more snow to come throughout the day, a Winter Weather Advisory was issued for the Front Range Mountains,” forecasters said.

That advisory will be in effect until 8 p.m. Tuesday for parts of Jackson, Larimer, Boulder, Grand, Gilpin, Clear Creek, Summit and Park counties, including Rocky Mountain National Park. Additional snow accumulations between 6 and 14 inches are possible on Tuesday, forecasters said in the alert.

Advertisement

As of Tuesday, the weather service’s snow forecasts included:

  • 2 inches on I-70’s Vail Pass, with up to 3 inches possible
  • 3 inches in Winter Park, with up to 4 inches possible
  • 4 inches in Eldora and on U.S. 6’s Loveland Pass, with up to 5 inches possible
  • 4 inches on U.S. 40’s Berthoud Pass near Winter Park, with up to 7 inches possible
  • 5 inches at Bear Lake in Rocky Mountain National Park, with up to 7 inches possible
  • 6 inches on U.S. 34’s Milner Pass in RMNP, with up to 8 inches possible
  • 7 inches on Colorado 14’s Cameron Pass near Fort Collins, with up to 8 inches possible
  • 9 inches on Mount Zirkel, the highest summit of Colorado’s Park Range of the Rocky Mountains, with up to 11 inches possible

“Travel could be very difficult,” weather service forecasters stated in the winter weather advisory. “The hazardous conditions will impact the Tuesday morning and evening commutes.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending