Connect with us

Nebraska

Protect Colorado agriculture — do the homework on Nebraska canal plan (Letters)

Published

on

Protect Colorado agriculture — do the homework on Nebraska canal plan (Letters)


We need to do our homework on Nebraska canal plan

Re: “Colorado’s water war with Nebraska comes to a head,” Sept. 21 news story

Farming in northeastern Colorado has never been easy, and it is getting harder. Markets are tough, input costs are up, and young people are leaving. What keeps communities in Northeastern Colorado going is agriculture, the water, the ground, and the community that ties everything together. The proposed Perkins County Canal — to carry South Platte River water into Nebraska — threatens all of it.

When you take water off farmland, the damage does not stop in crop yields. Equipment dealers, elevators, local banks, and businesses all feel it. Schools and roads will suffer. We have seen what happens to towns that lose their agricultural base, and we cannot let that happen again without a real fight.

That fight needs to be a regional one. I am asking communities across northeastern Colorado to come together and hire an independent economic consultant to assess the true local impact of this project (acres affected, jobs at risk, income lost, tax base eroded).

Advertisement

The Corps of Engineers will do its own analysis, but we need our own numbers. If their conclusions do not match what our communities are actually facing, we need the documentation to say so and demand they take another look.

Rural communities have always figured out how to help each other when it counts. This is one of those times. I urge local officials, water boards, farm bureaus, and civic leaders to set aside any differences and work together on this. The permit process will not wait, and neither can we.

Kimberly L. Kinnison, Ovid

Don’t let our children be ‘policy pawns’

Re: “District accused of violating Title IX,” March 14 news story

The Trump administration seems intent on the persecution of transgender children, excluding them from bathrooms, sports and school activities. Refusing to allow transgender children to participate in school in a manner consistent with their gender identity promotes the exclusion of particularly vulnerable children.

Advertisement

Participation in sports, access to bathrooms in which they feel comfortable, and full inclusion are critical components of healthy development for all children.

Some children are taller, faster, or stronger, have been training with private coaches or attending schools with better facilities, but the requirement of biological uniformity applies only to transgender children.

Exclusion harms children. Is this in dispute? Our children are not political pawns.

Jane Cates, Jefferson County

Don’t forget the Denver Chamber Music Festival

Re: “Classical blast,” March 15 feature story

Advertisement



Source link

Nebraska

Today in History – June 17: Nebraska boomtown named Kearney County seat

Published

on

Today in History – June 17: Nebraska boomtown named Kearney County seat


LOWELL, Neb. (WOWT) – On this day in 1872, the boomtown of Lowell, Nebraska was named the seat of Kearney County.

The Nebraska State Historical Society says the Burlington and Missouri River Railroads chose it as a town site the year before.

For a short time, it became a major shipping point for central Nebraska.

Its status would be short-lived.

Advertisement

Later that year, the railroad expanded to Kearney, which became the center for regional trading.

Lowell’s land office was removed in 1874.

Four years later, the boom town was nothing more than a village.

MORE LOCAL HISTORY

On July 4, 2026, our country will celebrate its 250th birthday. Every day leading up to it, First Alert 6 will take a look at the people and events that shaped our area.

Advertisement

Get a first alert to severe weather approaching your area. Download the First Alert 6 Weather app.

Copyright 2026 WOWT. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nebraska

Nebraska Governor Jim Pillen gets operational update on Western NE’s South Fork Fire

Published

on

Nebraska Governor Jim Pillen gets operational update on Western NE’s South Fork Fire


RAPID CITY, S.D. (KOTA) -Governor Jim Pillen has visited the site of the South Fork fire to get an operational update.

Pillen was on the ground where fire crews have been working to contain the South Fork fire, which began last Tuesday. Pillen sat down with KOTA Territory News and commended the work of volunteer firefighters and others working to put the fire out.

“When we flew over, you know the terrain is extraordinary, really, really grateful that we that we have, I think they’re called the hotshots from the Rocky Mountain Incident Command team, these are folks that are trained to fight fires in the most extreme, difficult circumstances,” said Pillen.

The governor credited those specialized hot crews with keeping the fire from growing more than it did. The South Fork Fire has presented challenges, with wind blowing the fire in all directions at different times. Firefighters initially focused on keeping the fire away from the community of Crawford and the historic Fort Robinson State Park. Governor Pillen says he’s been keeping an eye on Fort Robinson.

Advertisement

“It’s our Calvary, let’s just think about our two hundred and fifty years of freedom, freedom’s very expensive, and where would we be without the Calvary, the fort was the home of it, it’s pretty incredibly important,” said Pillen.

Pillen says he believes about 30 ranching families have been impacted by the fire. Pillen said Tuesday morning that about half of the roughly 40,000 acres burned were owned by ranchers. He says all of the ranches have so far been saved.

“There’s a couple of ranches where the strips were cut around them, firefighters fought the water, saved the hay, saved the carrels, saved the ranch homes and the barns, so that’s heroic stuff,” said Pillen.

Crews have lines around the entire fire, and continued to bolster those lines on Tuesday. Wednesdays strong winds are expected to present those lines with a test of their containment power.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Advertisement

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Copyright 2026 KOTA. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nebraska

Vermont And Nebraska Earn Top Grades In Public Education Report

Published

on

Vermont And Nebraska Earn Top Grades In Public Education Report


A new report finds Nebraska and Vermont tops in their commitment to public education.

The Network for Public Education, a public education advocacy group co-founded by noted education historian Diane Ravitch, has been releasing reports on US education for nearly a decade. Their newest report, “Public Schooling in America,” looks at a broad collection of data in to measure “how seriously each statehouse takes its obligation to the children who attend public schools within its borders.”

The report issues letter grades for each state. Nebraska and Vermont were the only states to receive an A, while 17 states received an F.

Advertisement

Each state was scored in four areas for an overall score of 102 points. No state was perfect; Nebraska and Vermont scored 87.5 and 82 respectively. The gap between the top and bottom was large; Arizona and Florida came in at the bottom with scores of 18 and 14. Here is the breakdown for the categories.

Privatization: Voucher and Charter Expansion and Student Protections (58 points)

Ten states now have taxpayer-funded universal voucher programs in which all students are eligible. Twenty-seven voucher states do not require private school teachers to be certified. Nineteen states fund homeschooling “with few, if any, checks on instructional quality or student progress.” In all voucher states, students with disabilities give up their rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) when they take a voucher to attend private school.

In six states, more than half of all charter schools that ever had enrollment have closed. In 39 states, while for-profit charter schools may not be legal, for-profit companies are allowed to manage charter schools. In six states, more than 30% of all charter schools are run by for-profit companies. Only the state of Ohio makes contracts between charters and management companies available on the state education department website.

On the issue of privatization, only Kentucky and Nebraska were awarded an A. 16 states earned an F.

Advertisement

Protections for Homeschooled Children (4 points)

The report states that thirteen states now subsidize homeschooling through vouchers or tax credits. In many states, there have been frequent battles between legislators trying to pass accountability and transparency bills to regulate homeschooling like the Homeschool Legal Defense Association.

The report finds that eleven states do not currently require parents to report that they are homeschooling their children. Only two states prevent parents from starting homeschooling during a Child Protective Services investigation. Only eight states require a standardized test, a portfolio, or work to show the student’s academic progress. Only eleven states require that parents have any education of their own, and a GED is enough.

School Funding (16 points)

For the funding element of the report, the writers considered funding level, funding distribution, and funding effort. How much revenue per pupil was collected, how equitably was it distributed, and what percentage of the state’s gross domestic product does it represent? They also looked at average teacher salaries adjusted for the state’s cost of living; the same amount of pay earns a different standard of living depending on whether you are in metropolitan Seattle or rural Pennsylvania.

Advertisement

Florida landed in the bottom five states for all three categories, is the lowest for adjusted teacher salaries, and, as covered by the next category, has the highest percentage of underqualified teachers. Florida earned 0 of the 16 points; Arizona, Idaho, North Carolina, and Tennessee only earned 2 out of 16.

Overall, thirteen states received a B, thirteen received a C, and six earned a D.

The top state for funding was New York, followed by Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, and Wyoming.

Conditions That Promote Teaching and Learning (24 points)

This is perhaps the most difficult category to quantify. NPE used several factors, including corporal punishment, bullying and discrimination, student-teacher and student-counselor ratios, collective bargaining, and other factors that would attract high-quality teachers.

Advertisement

The authors found New York and Vermont led in this category. Arizona was at the bottom of the pack.

When it comes to measures that directly affect students– corporal punishment, bullying, non-discrimination laws– eighteen states earned a high rank. Missouri and South Dakota provided no protections in those areas.

Overall, thirteen states received a B, thirteen received a C, and six were awarded a D.

The writers pointed to several patterns that emerged from the study. States that resist homeschooling oversight are, in many cases, the same states subsidizing it. The study also notes a correlation for school choice support and a lack of support for public schools.

“The data confirm what we have long suspected: privatization and disinvestment go hand in hand,” said Carol Burris, Executive Director of NPE and the report’s author. “These are not states struggling with limited resources. They have made deliberate choices to abandon their public schools while directing billions in public dollars to private alternatives.”

Advertisement

The report makes use of NPE’s own research as well as work from other organizations, including the Education Law Center, the Learning Policy Institute, and EdChoice.

The report does not focus on test scores and it does not delve into individual school districts, but it provides a broad look at the educational policies of the states. It gives a comparison of how different legislatures have responded to the growing push for market-based school choice and privatization. While there are school choice advocates who argue that choice will ultimately strengthen traditional public education, looming over the movement is also the attitude expressed by Tiffany Justice, co-founder of Moms for America, when she was still a fellow at The Heritage Foundation and quoted in this report.

“If America’s public schools cease to exist tomorrow, America would be a better place,” Justice told ProPublica. The report attempts to trace which states are pursuing that vision.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending