Connect with us

Utah

Utah’s energy future – @theU

Published

on

Utah’s energy future – @theU


Above: Wilkes Center energy future panel discussion: from left, Laura Nelson (Idaho National Laboratory), Joseph Moore (Utah FORGE), William Anderegg (Wilkes Center for Climate Policy and Policy), Teresa Foley (rPlus Energies), Logan Mitchell (Utah Clean Energy)

At a recent panel discussion at the Wilkes Center for Climate Science & Policy’s annual summit at the University of Utah, energy experts gathered to discuss the future of alternative energy in Utah.

The panel represented a diverse cross-section of Utah’s energy landscape, featuring leaders from a national laboratory, academic research, non-profit advocacy and private industry. What emerged was a picture of a state uniquely positioned to lead in the clean energy transition, with abundant natural resources and a collaborative approach to energy development.

What also became evident during the discussion, moderated by Wilkes Center director William Anderegg, is that the U continues to be a key player in moving publicly funded research directly and often quickly to market, scaling new technologies for the benefit of all Utahns. “One Utah” and “The University for Utah” are not just aspirational mantras but actual products and services currently materializing in communities across the state. Large-scale energy production and grid expansion and resilience are no exception.

Advertisement

Utah’s ‘energy royal flush’

Theresa Foxley

“Utah was dealt the energy royal flush,” said Teresa Foxley, chief of staff for rPlus Energies, referencing an op-ed her company published recently about Utah’s diverse energy resources. Beyond traditional fossil fuels, Utah boasts exceptional renewable resources including solar, wind and geothermal, positioning the state for leadership in the energy transition.

Foxley’s company, a Salt Lake City-based renewable energy developer, exemplifies this potential. rPlus Energies is currently constructing the Green River Energy Center in Emery County, a massive 400-megawatt solar project paired with 400 megawatts of battery storage. When completed in 2026, it will be “the second largest project of its type in the country,” she said and represents a $1.1 billion investment in rural Utah.

The company is also developing pump storage hydro projects, a technology that pairs well with both renewable and nuclear energy by storing energy when abundant and releasing it during peak demand periods.

World-leading geothermal research

Joseph Moore

Josepth Moore, a research professor at the U, highlighted the state’s leadership in enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). He directs the Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE), a Department of Energy-funded project in Milford, Utah.

Advertisement

“FORGE is the only facility of its kind in the world, and so people around the world are certainly looking at us,” Moore stated. “We are leading the world in enhanced geothermal development already.”

Unlike traditional geothermal systems that rely on naturally occurring hot springs, EGS creates geothermal reservoirs by fracturing hot rock deep underground. The FORGE project has made significant advances in reducing drilling costs and developing new stimulation techniques that have attracted interest from major energy companies.

Moore emphasized geothermal’s enormous potential: “Tapping even 2% of the energy between two and six miles would give us more than 2000 times the yearly US energy needs. Keep in mind, this is clean. This is benign, very low environmental impact, very low induced seismic risks.”

Nuclear’s role in a clean energy future

Laura Nelson

Laura Nelson, Idaho National Laboratory’s (INL) regional engagement lead in Utah, discussed how nuclear energy can contribute to a reliable, clean energy future. Often considered “the nation’s nuclear energy lab,” INL, located in Idaho Falls, has been at the forefront of nuclear energy research for 75 years.

“We have a vision to change the world’s energy future,” Nelson said, describing INL’s mission to create “a resilient and sustainable energy future for everyone…that’s affordable, reliable, resilient and accessible.”

Advertisement

Nelson highlighted the growing interest in advanced nuclear reactors in Utah and throughout the West. Unlike the large nuclear plants built in the 1970s, she explained, these newer designs include small modular reactors (SMRs) and micro-reactors that offer flexibility for various applications, from providing consistent power for AI data centers to supporting military operations in remote locations.

“We need power that’s available when other resources may not be available, that we can call on 24/7, that can be there to meet our energy needs when maybe other resources aren’t available, or if we have failures on the system,” Nelson explained, emphasizing the importance of “firm power” in an increasingly renewable-heavy grid.

Clean energy economics and climate action

Logan Mitchell

Logan Mitchell, a climate scientist and energy analyst with Utah Clean Energy, brought the climate perspective to the discussion. As a nonprofit organization that has worked for 25 years to accelerate climate solutions in Utah, Utah Clean Energy focuses on decarbonizing buildings, transportation and the electricity sector.

Mitchell highlighted how economics is now driving the clean energy transition: “Clean energy is the most cost-effective form of energy production. It’s just more efficient…right now. This is the economics, and the efficiency of it is really overtaking other motivations.”

He also emphasized how renewable energy is bringing economic benefits to rural communities through tax revenue: “This pays for the local community center, the pharmacies and the pharmacists and the hospitals in those communities and is giving a lifeline to those communities.”

Advertisement

Collaboration as Utah’s strength

A common theme throughout the discussion in front of an appreciative late-afternoon crowd was Utah’s collaborative approach to energy development. The panelists agreed that Utah’s pragmatism and willingness to work across different energy resources has positioned the state as a leader in energy innovation.

As Mitchell noted, “We all need to get there together. We can’t leave behind the communities that powered us in the past. We all need to get there together.”

When asked about Utah’s electricity mix in 2035, the panelists offered varied predictions but generally agreed that the state would see more renewable energy, storage solutions and potentially nuclear power in its future. Mitchell suggested the grid could ultimately reach about 70% wind and solar with 30% “dispatchable” resources like geothermal, nuclear and hydropower

For Utah to overcome barriers to scaling these technologies, the panelists identified several challenges: misconceptions about renewable energy reliability, regulatory hurdles and permitting timelines, technological limitations and costs. Even so, they remained optimistic about Utah’s potential to lead in clean energy development through continued innovation and collaboration.

Higher education’s impact happening now

As Utah’s flagship RI university, the U is a critical player in the future of energy production in the Beehive State. Beyond hosting the 2025 Wilkes Climate Summit, which annually convenes leading policymakers, and nationally recognized scientists, foundations, and innovators to discuss the most promising and cutting-edge solutions for climate change, the U demonstrates repeatedly how academics and research translate directly and often quickly to public benefits.

Advertisement

As Nelson summarized: “Utah is a special place, and I appreciate that we often come together collaboratively when we disagree upon solutions, and our energy system is a critical part of that, because it’s so important to our quality of life, to our economies.”



Source link

Utah

Blame the NBA for Tanking, Not the Utah Jazz

Published

on

Blame the NBA for Tanking, Not the Utah Jazz


After two straight games of deliberately resting starters in the fourth quarter of action against the Atlanta Hawks and most recently, the Orlando Magic, for their past two losses, the Utah Jazz are sitting at the forefront of the NBA’s “tanking” discussion.

Advertisement

While it’s a loaded conversation, it’s also an incredibly hypocritical one considering that the three best teams in the league right now by record— the Oklahoma City Thunder, Detroit Pistons, and San Antonio Spurs— all built their rosters on the backs of the very evil we’re talking about.

Advertisement

This isn’t saying that the NBA shouldn’t look at ways to prevent this issue going forward, but rather they should look for ways to incentivize winning, as opposed to punishing losing.

Tanking

Advertisement

Feb 5, 2026; Dallas, Texas, USA; San Antonio Spurs forward Victor Wembanyama (1) walks past Dallas Mavericks forward Cooper Flagg (32) during the second half at the American Airlines Center. Mandatory Credit: Jerome Miron-Imagn Images | Jerome Miron-Imagn Images

Let’s make this abundantly clear: any team purposefully hurting their chances of winning games in the short term is guilty.

Throw the term “ethical tanking” out the window, because regardless of the path a team takes, the goal is the same. There’s no moral high ground in this conversation.

Tanking goes against the competitive spirit of sports. After all, the goal of sports is to win, so at its surface, teams trying to be bad is antithetical. However, with how major American sports leagues are geared towards competitive balance, it makes sense for teams looking for high-end talent to try to find that through the draft.

Advertisement

But tanking has been around forever, and it’s not worth going through the endless examples.

Current Model

Advertisement

Feb 21, 2021; Tampa, Florida, USA; Philadelphia 76ers center Joel Embiid (21) and guard Ben Simmons (25) talk against the Toronto Raptors during the first quarter at Amalie Arena. Mandatory Credit: Kim Klement-Imagn Images | Kim Klement-Imagn Images

Advertisement

In an effort to discourage teams from this (thanks, Sam Hinkie), the NBA flattened the lottery odds and now draws the first 4 spots in the event. This has had unintended consequences, though.

Last year, the Utah Jazz and Washington Wizards, who were the two worst teams by record, ended up picking fifth and sixth in the draft, while the Mavericks, who were one more play-in win away from making the playoffs, jumped past 10 teams with a worse record than them to land the already sensational Cooper Flagg. The Spurs, who’d picked in the top four the previous two years, jumped from 8th to 2nd in the order.

The result? Bad teams are forced to stay bad for longer in an attempt to get the high-end talent they’d hoped for, or simply being unable to take the step toward contention, even if they tried. It also incentivizes more teams, especially those on the fringes of the play-in tournament, to about-face and give themselves a better chance at winning the lottery, when otherwise only the worst teams would be battling it out.

This year, there are already at least seven teams that are jockeying for lottery position, and that doesn’t include the New Orleans Pelicans, who can’t get out of the cellar. It’s early February! We still have over a third of the season to go, and more teams have punted than ever.

Advertisement

The other issue with the new lottery system is that it forces teams to worry more about their “floor” because there’s a significant chance that teams will backslide in the order.

Jazz Discussion

Advertisement

Feb 7, 2026; Orlando, Florida, USA; Utah Jazz center Jaren Jackson Jr. (20) shoots during the second half against the Orlando Magic at Kia Center. Mandatory Credit: Mike Watters-Imagn Images | Mike Watters-Imagn Images

Advertisement

Lastly, let’s talk about the Jazz, because they are very much tanking to keep their pick this year. They owe a top-eight protected pick to the reigning champions, meaning if the Jazz land one through eight in the draft order, they’ll keep their pick, and if it’s outside of that window, it goes to OKC.

This is the last year that the pick is owed before the pick debt is extinguished. Frankly, it makes zero sense for the Jazz to give away a premium asset when they can prevent it, so that is what they’ll do.

The reason the Jazz are talked about is because they have talent on their roster. Lauri Markkanen is an All-Star caliber player, while Keyonte George is already knocking on the door in his third season. If Walker Kessler hadn’t injured his shoulder, the Jazz probably would’ve been a play-in caliber team this year and unavoidably conveyed the pick.

After trading for Jaren Jackson Jr. this past week, however, the Jazz are once again under the watchful eye of many. The Jazz are talented, poised for a surge up the standings next season, but also young and have a record of 16-37 and 9 games out of the last play-in spot.

Advertisement

Their options for this year are: strategically keep their pick by putting their young players in uncomfortable positions to develop, or they could push for the play-in, come up short, and give a top-10 pick to the reigning champions for nothing.

Advertisement

Hard decision, right?

Bottom Line

Advertisement

Feb 3, 2026; Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Utah Jazz forward/center Lauri Markkanen (23) dribbles the ball in the first half against the Indiana Pacers at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-Imagn Images | Trevor Ruszkowski-Imagn Images

The NBA does have a tanking problem. It’s bad for the product when a quarter of the league is attempting to lose games; however, they have nobody to blame but themselves for the way things are structured.

For the morality police of “ethical tanking,” take a look in the mirror, because in all likelihood, your team would be, is, or has done the same thing that the Jazz are doing right now.

Frankly, each team should do what they deem as the best long-term plan for them, and that’s what the Utah Jazz, and the rest of the teams around the association fighting for draft position, are doing.

Advertisement

Be sure to bookmark Utah Jazz On SI and follow @JazzOnSI on X to stay up-to-date on daily Utah Jazz news, interviews, breakdowns and more!



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

University of Utah’s president explains why school bought a $4.5 million statue ‘that screams love’

Published

on

University of Utah’s president explains why school bought a .5 million statue ‘that screams love’


“It is the role of this institution to create positive change,” Taylor Randall told donors and others in a ceremony for an iconic “LOVE” sculpture.

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) Jason and Courtney Hawks take a selfie in front of Robert Indiana’s LOVE sculpture at the Utah Museum of Fine Arts in Salt Lake City on Saturday, Feb. 7, 2026.

Taylor Randall said people have asked him why the University of Utah, where he’s the president, just spent millions on a sculpture when the school is working under a tight budget.

At a formal ceremony Saturday at the Utah Museum of Fine Arts to welcome the “LOVE” sculpture designed by the late artist Robert Indiana, Randall told donors and other attendees that universities exist not only to inspire students’ intellect, but also “to teach about emotion.”

“It is the role of this institution to create positive change,” he said. “So we have a statue that screams love in the midst of often chaos, competition and argument.”

Advertisement

The U. announced last October that it had purchased the sculpture for $4.5 million. To meet that price, donors put up $2.5 million, and another $2 million came from Utah’s public art funding.

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) University of Utah President Taylor Randall speaks at a celebration of the installation of Robert Indiana’s LOVE sculpture at the Utah Museum of Fine Arts in Salt Lake City on Saturday, Feb. 7, 2026.

The sculpture’s design was first created by Indiana for a holiday card in 1965, according to UMFA director Gretchen Dietrich, when the artist, she said, “was thinking about the very, very big, complex ideas of love — and love is complicated.”

“Love is full of every human emotion that there is,” Dietrich said. “I think now, just as many times before, we need more love in this world, and I absolutely hope that this will be an emblem for that in our city.”

According to Dietrich, the “LOVE” sculpture that now sits on the U.’s campus is one of 86 such statutes placed around the world. Only eight others match the size of UMFA’s — 12 feet tall, 12 feet wide and 6 feet thick.

Advertisement

The statue, she said, was displayed in New York City for more than 20 years before its journey to Utah began in December 2023, when she had lunch with Jonathan Freedman — a former advisory member for UMFA — and he told her it was for sale.

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) People pose for a photo during a celebration of the installation of Robert Indiana’s LOVE sculpture at the Utah Museum of Fine Arts in Salt Lake City on Saturday, Feb. 7, 2026.

“The acquisition of this amazing artwork has come to fruition thanks in large part to this man’s tenacity,” Dietrich said of Freedman.

Freedman said he worked with Lindsay Griffith of New York City’s Christie’s auction house to acquire the “LOVE” sculpture for UMFA after she told him The Robert Indiana Legacy Initiative was interested in selling the art.

“This is the best part of what we do,” said Griffith, who came to Salt Lake City for the celebration. “Bringing iconic works to universities and museums and cities like this.”

Advertisement

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) People gather for a celebration of the installation of Robert Indiana’s LOVE sculpture at the Utah Museum of Fine Arts in Salt Lake City on Saturday, Feb. 7, 2026.

Freedman said he hopes the statue can serve as a unifying declaration amidst turbulent times.

“Robert Indiana always said that he considered love a one-word poem,” he said. “There’s no more important time … than now to have a big and bold statement staked in Utah that says we believe in love, we believe in coming together, we believe in solving problems.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

How to watch or listen to Iowa State at Utah

Published

on

How to watch or listen to Iowa State at Utah


Who: Iowa State (18-5, 6-5 Big 12) at Utah (16-7, 7-4 Big 12)

Where: Huntsman Center – Salt Lake City, Utah

When: Saturday, February 7, 2026 – 6:00 p.m.

Watch: ESPN+ (PxP: Tony Parks, Analyst: Elaine Elliott, Sideline: Sammie Miller)

Advertisement

Listen: Cyclone Radio Network (PxP: Noah Wolf, Analyst: Jamie Steyer Johnson)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending