Connect with us

Technology

This whistle fights fascists

Published

on

This whistle fights fascists

Kit Rocha and Courtney Milan have a knack for drawing attention to a cause. The bestselling romance novelists helped raise half a million dollars for Georgia voting rights in 2020. Now, their cause is whistles, because whistles let neighbors alert each other when they see ICE agents abducting people. They’ve helped create a group that’s shipped a half million free 3D-printed whistles to 49 US states — 200,000 of them in the first week of February alone.

Even I print whistles now. It’s the first thing I do each morning after dropping kids at school, and the very last before bed. Usually, I squeeze in a hundred more after dinner.

I print whistles because reality still matters; whistles get neighbors to come running, make sure enough people are recording, so when the regime pretends there’s only one camera angle of Renee Good’s death, we know the truth.

I also make whistles because it’s easy. You can literally do it in your sleep. I’ve made over 12,000 whistles since January 15th with three printers and almost zero optimization. I’ll harvest 300 of them tomorrow morning, 300 in the late afternoon, and another 100 in the evening before I do it all again.

Printing whistles is more cost-effective than drop-shipping them from China. Even if I bought filament at retail prices and paid PG&E’s full exorbitant California electricity rates, I’d be spending around 5 cents per whistle — and the unit economics only get better from there.

Advertisement

Across the country, people are realizing these printers can serve a bigger purpose than building toys and trinkets. Whether someone is looking for 100 whistles to protect friends and family, 200 for a church or school, or 1,000 for a whole neighborhood, requests are flooding in, each one vetted and added to a spreadsheet by volunteers.

No one is told what to do, which whistle to print, or which request to fulfill. These Signal chats feel like a community, building and innovating everything as we go.

The whistles weren’t always 3D-printed. Last summer, some protesters at No Kings rallies already carried whistles to make noise. Following the 2025 raids in Los Angeles, Latino day laborers learned to carry whistles to alert each other about ICE. But Chicago may have proved that 3D-printed whistles could be the future of neighborhood-by-neighborhood organizing.

Emily Hilleren wished she’d been there on October 1st when, she later heard, ICE abducted someone right in front of her nearby school. She was never more than two blocks away the entire time, she tells The Verge, but she never had the opportunity to help. If her neighbors had whistles, they could have blown them and rushed to document the abduction. She decided to make whistles her mission.

She already had a small stash of whistle kits she’d packaged with friends just the previous evening. She’d heard how nearby Little Village had adopted the Los Angeles whistle techniques to warn about ICE raids, how the local Pilsen Arts & Community House had similarly been inspired by LA to create whistle-packing parties last August.

Advertisement

Originally, she figured she’d simply put her whistle kits into a little free library, the kind neighbors use to share books. But the abductions galvanized her to do more. She began hosting her own Whistlemania events at local bars, pairing the Pilsen Arts’ zine with cheap, premade whistles she found on Amazon. She says she spent a couple of thousand dollars, eventually setting up a GoFundMe to recoup her costs.

Pilsen Arts’ Form a Crowd, Stay Loud teaches the Whistle Code: Blow in short bursts if you see ICE nearby; blow long blasts if they’re detaining someone. Cofounder Teresa Magaña tells us her zine is now distributed in 25 states and was directly inspired by this video from comedian Marquez Acuna.

Soon, the supply of cheap Amazon whistles dried up. But that’s when those bestselling romance novelists entered the picture.

Before Romancelandia showed up for us, it showed up for Emily Hilleren, when Rocha sent some of her very first shipments of 3D-printed whistles to Chicago so the whistle parties could continue. When Border Patrol largely left Chicago, Hilleren returned the favor. She found she still had thousands of whistles piled in her living room, whistles that were needed elsewhere. So she joined forces with Rocha’s online group, which refocused on producing and distributing nationwide.

Like many whistlemakers who were already 3D printing enthusiasts, I started by using whatever leftover filament I had on the shelf. Each 1-kilogram (2.2-pound) roll of plastic produces roughly 500 whistles, depositing the molten string layer by layer to build objects from the ground up. My supply didn’t last long, but I didn’t have to buy more after that — because whenever Kit Rocha and her author friends spread the word that supplies are running low, donors come out of the woodwork. An hour after her Bluesky post, weeks’ worth of filament was on its way to my door.

Nor do whistlemakers necessarily have to pay for postage, because Hilleren brought her GoFundMe along for the ride. Today, she uses those donations to reimburse whistlemakers with shipping receipts, and says she puts any leftover money toward community aid.

So far, donors largely buy filament for us through Amazon wishlists, and Amazon is a company the community has mixed feelings about. But groups like ours have convinced at least one small filament maker, Protopasta, to supply the whistle effort. Operations manager Heidi DiJulio tells me the company’s ready to donate hundreds of rolls of filament, and has today it’s launching a program where donors can support us with its small-batch filament for $20 a roll, competitive with what Amazon charges.

Advertisement

By December, over 20 members had shipped 40,000 whistles. Then ICE came to Minneapolis and killed Renee Good.

“So many people were so upset and they didn’t know what to do, and we could say, here is something you can do,” Rocha tells me. “You can join a print. You can send us filament. You can go find people who need whistles and direct them to us. I think in that moment of pain, that is really when it started to take off.”

A woman blows her whistle at US Border Patrol agents at a gas station in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 21st.

A woman blows her whistle at US Border Patrol agents at a gas station in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 21st.
Photo by Roberto Schmidt / Getty Images

A month later, the “Whistle Crew” has over 180 members — sharing their sparkly creations, asking for printer advice, and attempting to improve the group’s processes at almost every hour of the day. Shortly after I joined, one spun up a Whistle Crew Wiki to answer frequently asked questions and help newcomers navigate. Others create new whistle designs that print faster to meet growing demand.

Many stick to printing derivatives of two particular whistles, the ACstudio Micro Bitonal and the Penne. The Micro Bitonal is an incredibly shrill, ear-piercing two-tone whistle that needs only a light blow; the latter uses more air to produce a simpler sound, but has been explicitly tweaked for mass production. But I see lots of hearts and quite a few BakedBeans now, too. Some makers print emergency telephone numbers or slogans atop the whistles, like “Fuck ICE” or “4 Good,” while others beautify them with wavy patterns. I keep it simple by printing most out of multicolor filament.

It’s not entirely foolproof. One morning, I woke up to find my printer fan had mysteriously detached, a frozen explosion of rainbow plastic waiting inside its chamber. Another time, I found a half-printed plate of whistles because my Elegoo Centauri Carbon review unit couldn’t quite tell when it ran out of filament and kept “printing” on air. My Bambu Lab P1P lost two to three whistles per print due to poor bed adhesion, until I added a BIQU Panda Cryogrip Frostbite plate that sticks so well, the whistles make a satisfying pop when I bend the plate to detach them.

Advertisement
Inside the box of a 3D printer, strings and gobs of rainbow filament are strewn across the bed, hang from the platform inside, and cover its floor.

I don’t know how this rare print failure happened, but it was quite a mess afterwards.
Photo: Sean Hollister / The Verge

There was the day I found a previously working whistle design had started producing entire plates of silent whistles. And like many other whistlemakers, I once made the mistake of thinking my printer could automatically arrange an entire plate of whistles without fusing them all together.

Over 500 rainbow whistles, stacked three high, sit atop the bed of a tiny Bambu A1 Mini printer. They were all printed at once.

Some makers print stacks of whistles, like a layer cake, so even the smallest printers can produce hundreds in one go.
Photo: Rich Bowman

But generally, it works. With the Bambu printers, I can press a button on my phone to start a plate of 105 whistles and expect each to blow loud and shrill. I test one sacrificial whistle from each plate, then throw that whistle away. I don’t even need to use desktop software: Another maker had already created and uploaded the 105-whistle plate to Bambu’s phone app.

3D printers were nowhere near this reliable even five years ago. “It’s pretty mind-blowing now to just take a thing out of a box, do minimal setup and be printing,” says journalist Dan Sinker, also a member of the Whistle Crew. “Like I was printing a plate of whistles probably 30 minutes after plugging it in, and then I never stopped.”

Courtney Milan is the pen name of Heidi Bond, a former US Supreme Court law clerk who wants to protect whistlemakers from possible government bullies. While she says she can’t give legal advice, she helped the group establish ground rules to avoid anything that could be interpreted as a conspiracy to interfere with ICE.

“We’re 3D-printing tools to allow people to exercise their First Amendment right to assemble and to redress the government for grievances,” she says. “We are not trying to enable any other behavior.”

Advertisement

The first rule of Whistle Chat is that anyone posting about illegal activity immediately gets banned. The second is that whistlers are “a loose collective of 3D printing enthusiasts” who merely coordinate with one another, and that admins don’t control the group.

Admins are careful when people ask for the free whistles, too: “If anyone is requesting whistles for a purpose that is not a lawful purpose, we will not fulfill that request.”

It hasn’t happened yet. “If somebody sent us that email, they’re probably a fed trying to entrap us, right? When ordinary people reach out to us, they say, ‘I’m trying to keep my community safe.’”

Bond is worried her rules may not be enough, now that the Trump regime is arresting journalists for exercising their First Amendment rights and claiming Alex Pretti deserved to die for exercising his Second Amendment right. There’s reason to believe they might crack down on whistles, too: They’re already driving MAGA provocateurs up the wall, with one calling them “hearing loss causing machines that terrorists use against ICE.”

Bond calls bullshit: “If we ‘impede ICE’ simply by being there and observing them, the thing that is happening is not us impeding ICE in the exercise of its power, it is ICE being too ashamed to do unlawful acts when being watched by people.” She says it’s time to take a stand, that “the freedoms we enjoy will go away if we do not exercise them.”

Advertisement

Sometimes, I think: Whistles don’t stop bullets. They didn’t save Renee Good. They didn’t save Alex Pretti. “It doesn’t help. It doesn’t really serve a purpose other than shame,” one woman tells me, and for a brief moment, I wonder if that’s true.

But when I share my thoughts with Rocha and other whistlers, they say the whistles are also about human connection, about sharing and displaying a physical symbol that you’re here for your neighbors, knowing you’re not alone, starting a dialogue that can lead to phone trees and mutual aid networks, finding power when you feel powerless.

It’s our blood and bones, and these whistles and phones, against Miller and Noem’s dirty lies

— Bruce Springsteen, “Streets of Minneapolis”

“Once I started giving out whistles, I started seeing how when you directly help somebody it impacts not just others but yourself, because a lot of anxiety is wrapped up in the loss of control,” a man named Matt from Minneapolis tells me.

America Garcia, a first-generation Mexican American, says she felt the power firsthand. She was packing her car one day and heard honking, saw ICE on the corner of her street, immediately feared for her immigrant mother, and started blowing her whistle. “It was this burst of adrenaline,” she tells me, “and once I started hearing the collective whistling on my block, it felt even more powerful.”

Advertisement
A pile of blue 3D-printed whistles in every orientation, with the phone number 612-441-2881 pirinted on one side and “Monarca” on the other.

Sometimes we get custom orders asking us to print ICE rapid response hotlines or messages on the whistles.
Photo: Star Stuff

While ICE detained the two men they were after, she hopes it may have saved other vulnerable immigrants who heard the whistles and took it as a sign not to leave their homes.

Maureen “Mo” Ryan, a contributing editor at Vanity Fair who introduced Rocha to Hilleren and carries a whistle at all times, says it makes her feel “like maybe I’m not totally helpless if something terrible happens to my neighbors,” because “I can alert others and they might be able to stay safe even if I can’t prevent what’s happening in front of me.”

Hilleren says, “My neighbors are being snatched, they’re being ransomed, they’re being separated from their families, and I can’t stop it. But knowing that I’m trying and seeing all the other good people who are trying, that reminds me that a better world is possible.”

Besides, sometimes shame does work right away. I think of the powerful words of Dan Sinker, describing a moment in Chicago when the whistles, and the people they summoned to witness, stopped ICE in its tracks.

“A report rang out that a child was hiding, and people converged. Whistles around necks, a half-dozen in moments. One heard whistles when dropping her own child off at school. Another rode up on a bike. Everyone unsure of what to do except to do what any parent would do: ensure a child is safe,” Sinker wrote. “The child was safe.”

Advertisement

Bond says that while whistles may not stop bullets, they can stop bullies by making their actions socially unacceptable.

“The whistle says, ‘We will stand up and we will watch, and we will judge you and we will remember, and we will witness. And you will not get away with it,’” says Bond. “‘You may think you’re doing it right now, but you will not get away with it.’ That’s what a whistle says.”

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Technology

Get a $30 credit when you reserve Samsung’s upcoming Galaxy phones

Published

on

Get a  credit when you reserve Samsung’s upcoming Galaxy phones

Even though they haven’t been officially announced yet, Samsung is giving you a chance to save some cash when you preorder what we’re expecting to be the brand’s updated Galaxy Z Fold phones. The next Galaxy Unpacked event will take place on July 22nd, 2026, and features the tagline “A new shape unfolds.” In addition to seeing updated versions of the existing Flip and Fold form factors, we anticipate the debut of a new, wider foldable phone. If you register your interest ahead of time and end up preordering one of the new phones shortly after they’re announced, Samsung will give you a $30 store credit at checkout.

There are some caveats to this offer. You have to use the credit when you preorder the phone. No saving it for later. Also, the credit can’t be applied to the cost of the phone either, so you’ll have to put it towards the cost of accessories or extra services. Samsung specifically calls out that select Galaxy rings, earbuds, watches, and tablets are eligible, or you can use it to help pay for Samsung Care Plus.

There are no downsides to registering your interest, so if you think you might be interested in buying one of the upcoming phones, it’s worth filling out the form. As long as you use the same email during checkout, the credit will be automatically applied.

Continue Reading

Technology

Apple AI security update proves hackers move fast

Published

on

Apple AI security update proves hackers move fast

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A security update rarely feels dramatic. You see the alert, promise yourself you will install it later and then go right back to whatever you were doing. This time, Apple is giving you a stronger reason to pay attention.

Advertisement

Apple released iOS 26.5.2, iPadOS 26.5.2 and macOS Tahoe 26.5.2 on June 29, 2026. The updates include security fixes for vulnerabilities tied to the kernel, WebKit and WebRTC. Apple says these fixes were first made available through the iOS 26.6, iPadOS 26.6 and macOS Tahoe 26.6 betas before being pushed out early to everyone.

That is the part that should make you pause. Apple usually rolls many security fixes into larger software updates. This time, the company moved faster.

AI IS NOW POWERING CYBERATTACKS, MICROSOFT WARNS

Apple pushed out security fixes early because AI can help hackers study software flaws faster. (Nikolas Kokovlis/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

Advertisement
  • Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
  • For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
  • Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

Why Apple released this AI security update early

Apple reportedly accelerated the updates because artificial intelligence can help speed the creation of malicious hacking tools. Once a fix appears in a beta, attackers may be able to study it, reverse-engineer the weakness and move faster than before.

Apple said there was no evidence that the newly patched vulnerabilities had been exploited. Still, the company wanted to shrink the time between when fixes were first visible and when they reached your devices.

That is a major shift. It suggests Apple sees AI as a force that changes the timing of security. A flaw that once gave defenders more breathing room may now become a race.

What Apple fixed in iOS 26.5.2

Apple’s iOS 26.5.2 and iPadOS 26.5.2 notes list fixes for iPhone 11 and later, along with several supported iPad models. The security content includes kernel vulnerabilities that could let an app crash the system, corrupt kernel memory or leak sensitive kernel state.

The update also fixes multiple WebKit issues. WebKit powers Safari and web content inside many apps. Some of these flaws involved malicious web content that could lead to crashes, memory corruption, data leaks or sandbox escapes.

Apple also fixed WebRTC issues that could be triggered by malicious web content and lead to Safari or process crashes.

Advertisement

For Mac, Apple lists macOS Tahoe 26.5.2 as the current release. If your Mac runs macOS Sonoma or macOS Sequoia, Apple also lists Safari 26.5.2 as a June 29, 2026, security release.

A woman uses a smartphone outside an Apple Store on June 20, 2026, in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China. (Cheng Xin/Getty Images)

Why AI hacking tools change the security race

AI can help legitimate researchers find bugs faster. That is good when the work leads to stronger software and responsible disclosure. However, the same general capability can also help bad actors move faster. A criminal does not need to understand every line of code if an AI tool can help summarize a patch, compare software changes or suggest where a weakness may be hiding.

That is why Apple’s move is important. It shows that big tech companies may need to release security fixes sooner and more often, even when those updates do not include flashy new features. The wider AI world adds pressure here. Frontier AI companies have released or tested systems with stronger coding and cybersecurity capabilities. Some models are available only through limited previews, approved access or extra safeguards because of their potential cyber use.

Similar efforts are also emerging outside the United States. Several international AI labs and security companies now promote models designed to find vulnerabilities, analyze code and assist cyber defense. The takeaway for you isn’t that AI is automatically bad. The real point is speed. Security teams, attackers and AI tools are now moving on a shorter clock.

Advertisement

How to update your iPhone or iPad

Before you update, plug in your device and connect to Wi-Fi. You may also want to back up your iPhone or iPad first.

Then do this: Open Settings > General > Software Update > Download and Install.

After the update finishes, go back to Settings > General > Software Update > Automatic Updates. Make sure automatic updates are turned on. Apple also lets your device automatically install system file updates that improve security without changing the full software version. If you do not see the update right away, check again later. Apple releases updates in stages, and your device also needs enough battery and storage.

How to update your Mac

On a Mac, start with a backup. Then click the Apple menu > System Settings > General > Software Update . Choose Update Now if macOS Tahoe 26.5.2 appears.

Next, check your background update settings. On macOS Tahoe 26 or later, go to Apple menu > System Settings > General > Software Update . Click the More Info button next to Automatic Updates and make sure Install system data files and security updates is turned on.

Advertisement

If your Mac runs Sonoma or Sequoia, look for Safari 26.5.2 in Software Update as well. That Safari update may be the protection your Mac needs if you are not on Tahoe.

BEWARE OF HACKERS SHOWING UP PRETENDING TO BE IT

What this Apple security update means to you

You may see more security updates that feel sudden or small. That can be annoying, especially when you are busy or your device needs to restart.

Still, these updates are becoming more important. Apple is reacting to a world where AI can help shorten the time between a public fix and a possible attack.

So, when your iPhone, iPad or Mac asks you to update, do not treat it like background noise. The update may be closing a door someone else is already trying to find.

Advertisement

Updating your iPhone, iPad and Mac helps close security holes before attackers get more time to exploit them. (Katharina Kausche/picture alliance via Getty Images)

How to stay safe after the Apple security update

Installing the Apple AI security update is the best first move. After that, tighten a few habits that make attacks harder.

1) Keep your apps updated

Your operating system is only part of the security picture. Outdated apps can still create risk, especially if they handle messages, web links, photos, files or account logins. Open the App Store and install available updates regularly.

2) Watch out for suspicious links

Be careful with links in texts, emails and social media messages. WebKit and browser flaws are a reminder that malicious web content can be part of an attack. When in doubt, open the official app or website yourself instead of tapping a link.

3) Use strong passwords and two-factor authentication

Use strong, unique passwords for every account and store them in a password manager. Then turn on two-factor authentication (2FA) wherever possible. If one password gets exposed, you do not want it opening the door to your email, bank or Apple account.

Advertisement

4) Use strong antivirus protection

Use strong antivirus protection on your Mac and other connected devices. It can help catch malicious files, phishing attempts and suspicious activity before they do damage. Get my picks for the best 2026 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android and iOS devices at CyberGuy.com.

5) Back up your data regularly

Back up your iPhone, iPad and Mac before problems hit. A recent backup can help you recover faster if an update fails, your device gets stolen or malware locks you out of important files. CyberGuy’s guide to backing up your devices walks you through ways to protect your files using cloud storage, an external drive or both.

6) Use a personal data removal service

Use a personal data removal service to reduce how much of your personal information is floating around online. Data brokers and people-search sites can expose your name, address, phone number and relatives. Scammers can use those details to make phishing messages feel more believable. Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting CyberGuy.com.

Kurt’s key takeaways

Apple’s early security release shows how fast the cyber threat landscape is changing. The company says there is no evidence these newly patched flaws were exploited, but it still moved the fixes out before the wider 26.6 release. That tells me the old habit of waiting weeks to update is getting riskier. AI can help defenders, but it can also help criminals study weaknesses faster. My advice is direct: update your Apple devices now, turn on automatic security updates and stop putting off patches that protect the phone and computer you use every day.

Do you think AI will make your devices safer because companies can find flaws faster, or more vulnerable because hackers can move faster too? Let us know by writing to us at CyberGuy.com.

Advertisement

Automatic updates, strong passwords and a personal data removal service can make you a harder target after the update. (Silas Stein/picture alliance via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

  • Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
  • For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
  • Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Technology

The robotaxi law that could ban Tesla

Published

on

The robotaxi law that could ban Tesla

For more than a decade, one question has loomed over the race to build autonomous vehicles: Are cameras alone enough to safely replace human drivers, or do truly driverless cars need additional, overlapping sensors like lidar and radar to navigate the world reliably? Tesla has bet billions of dollars that artificial intelligence and cameras are sufficient. Nearly every other major autonomous vehicle developer has gone the opposite direction.

Until now, that argument has largely been left to executives and engineers. New Jersey lawmakers are trying to settle it in state law.

A bill expected to come up for a vote later this year would require companies seeking to operate fully autonomous vehicles in New Jersey to use cameras plus two other sensing technologies, most commonly lidar and radar. If enacted, New Jersey would be the first state to codify such a hardware mandate into law, moving ahead of a nearly identical proposal currently pending action in neighboring New York. The measure would also effectively prevent Tesla’s camera-only Robotaxi system from operating in New Jersey unless the company changed its hardware.

”This is not anti-Tesla,” Democratic state Sen. Andrew Zwicker, the bill’s primary sponsor, told The Verge. “I’m pro-New Jersey safety.”

Zwicker, a physicist who works at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (New Jersey doesn’t restrict legislators from outside jobs), said after riding in a Waymo robotaxi in Phoenix he became convinced autonomous vehicles could transform transportation.

Advertisement

”I was amazed how quickly you get used to it,” he said.

Waymo uses several lidar sensors, while Tesla relies exclusively on cameras.
Bloomberg via Getty Images and Bloomberg via Getty Images

The technology, he argues, could dramatically expand mobility, reduce traffic deaths, and make transportation more accessible. But he believes the technology should roll out cautiously in the nation’s most densely populated state.

”At this point, I don’t think the evidence is sufficient that a single sensor with software can handle situations that humans can,” Zwicker said. “Can we get there? Maybe. But we’re not there yet.”

The proposal would establish a three-year pilot program governing the testing and deployment of fully autonomous vehicles in New Jersey. Companies would have to use multiple sensing technologies, report certain crashes, and receive state authorization before operating fully driverless commercial services. They would also have to complete at least 50,000 miles of supervised testing in New Jersey without a major incident before removing the human safety driver.

While state battles over autonomous vehicles have largely centered on safety performance, oversight, and potential job losses, New Jersey is attempting something different: legislating how the vehicles themselves should be built.

Advertisement

“At this point, I don’t think the evidence is sufficient that a single sensor with software can handle situations that humans can.”

— New Jersey state Sen. Andrew Zwicker

The sensor requirement is by far the bill’s most consequential provision and it would have repercussions beyond Tesla. Elon Musk has long argued that cameras paired with increasingly capable artificial intelligence are the best and most cost effective way to operate autonomous vehicles. Humans navigate the world using vision alone, Musk has said, so sufficiently advanced AI should eventually be able to do the same. Eliminating lidar and radar also dramatically lowers hardware costs, making it easier to build robotaxis cheaply enough to deploy at massive scale.

Musk has even argued that adding more sensors can reduce safety by forcing software to reconcile conflicting information.

”Lidar and radar reduce safety due to sensor contention. If lidars/radars disagree with cameras, which one wins?” he wrote on X last year. “We turned off the radars in Teslas to increase safety. Cameras ftw.”

Most of the rest of the autonomous vehicle industry disagrees. Companies including Waymo and Zoox combine cameras with lidar and radar, arguing that each sensing technology has different strengths and weaknesses. Cameras capture rich visual detail, allowing vehicles to recognize colors, traffic signs, lane markings, and pedestrians, but they can struggle in poor weather, darkness, or glare. Radar performs better in rain and fog and excels at measuring the distance and relative speed of nearby objects. Lidar uses lasers to create detailed three-dimensional maps of a vehicle’s surroundings, making it particularly effective at determining the shape and distance of nearby objects.

Advertisement

Rather than relying on a single sensor, those companies combine the strengths of all three, arguing that redundancy makes autonomous driving safer. Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon electrical and computer engineering professor and autonomous vehicle safety expert, said camera-only systems may eventually become capable enough for fully autonomous driving. But he doesn’t believe they are today.

As Koopman put it, “eyeballs are better than cameras for many reasons” and “human brains are fundamentally more powerful than AI because we understand.” While there are situations where Koopman said camera-only works just fine — clear weather, favorable lighting, and less complex roads — he believes it’s not ready for broad consumer use.

“To run 24/7 across the majority of public roads in New Jersey today, it needs lidar,” he said. “It’s pretty clear that today camera-only technology is not up to the challenge.”

Koopman supports the New Jersey proposal but said he would prefer even stronger safeguards, such as requiring conventional driving controls like steering wheels and pedals so first responders could move disabled vehicles (so no Cybercabs, which don’t have either), and limits on how many AVs can be on the road during the pilot (a potential provision Zwicker said he’s considering).

“It’s pretty clear that today camera-only technology is not up to the challenge.”

Advertisement

— AV expert Philip Koopman

“The difference between 100 cars and 10,000 cars is night and day,” Koopman said. When the scale is small, “There’s just not enough cars for that much weird stuff to happen to them.” He pointed to Waymo, which now operates more than 3,500 commercial robotaxis across 11 US metro areas.

”They never used to have problems with floodwaters and school buses — not because they could do floodwaters and school buses,” Koopman said. “But with 100 cars it just doesn’t happen that often.”

Despite a lot of fanfare, Tesla currently only has a handful of unsupervised Robotaxis on the road, mostly in Texas, according to data from Robotaxi Tracker, suggesting it hasn’t been as easy to scale the camera-only approach as Musk had previously promised. Last year he predicted that Tesla would have hundreds of thousands of fully self-driving Teslas operating by the end of 2026. (Tesla did not respond to requests for comment for this article.)

Many of the bill’s provisions mirror recommendations from SAVE-US, a nonprofit that advocates for stricter autonomous vehicle regulation. Physicist and SAVE-US national campaign director Shua Sanchez said the group formed because Congress has failed to establish national rules while autonomous vehicle companies have expanded into states with dramatically different levels of oversight.

“California has the best safety regulations in the country,” he said. “Texas, Arizona, and Georgia have almost no state oversight.”

Advertisement

Among the organization’s priorities is requiring redundant sensing systems.

“We don’t have a problem with Tesla as a company,” Sanchez said. “We have a problem with camera-only autonomous vehicles.”

Nearly every major stakeholder has sought changes to the bill. Waymo successfully pushed to remove a requirement that safety drivers remain in vehicles throughout the pilot, and Uber argued the state should continue requiring human drivers for most rides, according to Zwicker.

Tesla has been lobbying against the legislation in New Jersey, according to Zwicker, who said company representatives met with lawmakers to argue that advances in artificial intelligence make additional sensor types unnecessary. Zwicker said that while the tech has gotten better, “I’m not convinced yet that they’re ready to go.”

The debate has spilled beyond the state House.

Advertisement

“As written, the legislation imposes restrictions so severely that Tesla’s autonomous vehicle technology couldn’t legally operate in New Jersey,” read a Tesla missive to New Jersey Tesla owners encouraging them to contact lawmakers. “Rather than prioritizing real safety outcomes and performance, the bill specifically bans Tesla from the New Jersey market.”

Zwicker said his office received roughly 4,000 emails within a day. “The messaging wasn’t about the details of the bill,” he said. “It was that Zwicker is trying to take away your Autopilot.”

“Rather than prioritizing real safety outcomes and performance, the bill specifically bans Tesla from the New Jersey market.”

— A Tesla message to NJ owners

Zwicker rejects that characterization. The legislation applies only to fully autonomous vehicles operating under the proposed state pilot program — not driver-assistance systems that require a licensed human driver to remain behind the wheel.

The fight in New Jersey reflects a broader vacuum in autonomous vehicle regulation. Congress has debated national autonomous vehicle legislation for years without passing a comprehensive framework, leaving states to develop their own rules as commercial robotaxi services expand. Robotaxi services already operate in states including California, Texas, Arizona, and Georgia under dramatically different regulatory systems. While California requires extensive testing permits and public reporting, it doesn’t specify which tech the AVs need to get there. Texas has adopted a far lighter-touch approach, which lets automakers self-certify that their autonomous vehicles are ready for the road.

Advertisement

New Jersey’s bill raises the possibility that AV tech there could differ from that of other states. Zwicker says that isn’t his concern.

“The technology doesn’t exist in the Northeast at all,” he said. “The goal is to start now, do it safely, and build public trust.”

Sanchez sees the sensor requirement as a common-sense safeguard rather than a restriction on innovation.

“There are absolutely brilliant people working at Tesla trying to make camera-only autonomy work,” he said. “But they’re trying to do it with one arm tied behind their back.”

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending