South Dakota
How much will school choice bill cost South Dakota? Committee delays vote to find out
The House Education Committee is delaying a vote on a school choice finance bill for one week so it can get a definitive answer on how much the proposal would cost the state.
House Bill 1009, which would create South Dakota educational empowerment accounts, was brought by five members of the 15-person committee: Republican Reps. Heather Baxter, Phil Jensen, Dylan Jordan, Logan Manhart and Kathy Rice.
Jordan, who opened his testimony on the bill by noting he’s not a teacher, was the prime sponsor and couldn’t answer questions from committee members about what exactly his bill would cost the state, and what it could cost the South Dakota Department of Education in staffing and audits.
He noted the DOE hasn’t supported the bill.
What’s in HB 1009?
HB 1009 as introduced would make educational empowerment accounts with funds that could be spent on tuition fees; fees for sports programs and fine arts programs; textbooks, curricula or other instructional materials and supplies; educational therapies; registration fees for nationally standardized achievement tests, advanced placement exams or other tests or exams related to postsecondary admission; transportation services between a student’s home and the private school, institution of higher education or location or program the student is enrolled in; or, technological devices, instruments and equipment necessary for educational pursuits.
To open an account, parents of students who will attend private school must file a request with the DOE that acknowledges their student can’t switch back into public school or into alternative instruction that school year.
Each account would give parents the per student equivalent amount, which is currently $7,405.19, in the form of a debit card.
More than 15,000 students are currently enrolled in the state’s private schools. If all 15,185 private school students were given $7,405.19, that would total more than $112 million for the new program.
When Rice asked if Jordan would support an amendment reducing the funding amount, Jordan said he wouldn’t, because “we’d be saying individual children are worth less than others, and I thought we were all created equal.”
The DOE would be responsible for creating a handbook for participants, publishing forms for withdrawing an alternative instruction notification, conducting random audits of the accounts and taking the request forms for the account.
Meanwhile, a similar bill, House Bill 1020, would create education savings accounts and appropriate about $4 million to cover $3,000 in ESAs for students in the state’s private schools or alternative instruction. Money could only be spent on tuition and fees to qualifying schools, curriculum and associated instructional materials or supplies, “educationally related technological devices and associated hardware and services,” and fees for any standardized college entrance exam approved by the DOE.
Gov. Kristi Noem proposed that bill in her budget address and has support from DOE Secretary Joe Graves. It also differs from HB 1009 in that it sets up a tiered system of eligibility based on household income.
Proponents support school choice, question expense
Besides Jordan, other proponents of HB 1009 who spoke Wednesday included lobbyists from Young Americans for Liberty, South Dakota Parents Involved in Education, Family Voice Action and Americans for Prosperity and six parents from either Colton, Spearfish, Salem or Rapid City who spoke about the success they or their children have had in private school or homeschool.
Jordan began proponent testimony by thanking President Donald Trump for “calling for school choice nationally.” He said COVID-19 opened people’s eyes on the modern education system and showed “one-size-fits-all education policy” doesn’t work for everyone. Jordan added that “leftist, LGBTQIA2S+ communities and the ‘woke agenda’” have made its way into the public school system.
The proponents jointly spoke about the benefits of school choice and empowering parents to make that choice, how homeschooling can get expensive, and how the program could bring a “marketplace of ideas” to education in a new way.
However, lobbyists from Parents Involved in Education and Americans for Prosperity, along with a homeschooling father from Salem, cautioned about the expense of the bill and suggested reducing vouchers to the $3,000 Noem proposed. They questioned whether it would pass through the Capitol chambers and committees at such a large expense.
Opponents prefer financial support go to public education, not private
Opponents of HB 1009 who spoke Wednesday included lobbyists with Disability Rights South Dakota, Associated School Boards of South Dakota, School Administrators of South Dakota, South Dakota Education Association, the Sioux Falls and Rapid City School Districts, Large School Group, Bureau of Finance and Management, South Dakota United School Association and South Dakota Retailers Association.
They largely argued that the bill divests and diverts significant taxpayer dollars from public education into private schools that don’t follow the same accountability and equity rules that public schools follow. They said this year schools will have a much more lean budget, so it would be “irresponsible” to stand up a new program at such a time.
A lobbyist from Bureau of Finance and Management said Noem supports school choice, but believes the bill could cost South Dakota $157 million. and therefore asked the committee to oppose the bill.
Some of the education lobbyists also said the bill is “clunky” and questioned what unforeseen expenses families may use the debit cards to pay for with little accountability or oversight.
Ultimately, the vote to delay a vote on the bill for one week to Jan. 29 until a fiscal note is prepared by the Legislative Research Council passed with nine in favor, five dissenting and one member excused.
South Dakota
Nature: Prairie chickens in South Dakota
South Dakota
Democrats fail to field candidates for a majority of South Dakota legislative seats
(SOUTH DAKOTA SEARCHLIGHT) – Democrats are running for 46 of South Dakota’s 105 legislative seats — leaving 56% of seats without a Democratic candidate.
That doesn’t bode well for the party ahead of November, said Michael Card, professor emeritus of political science at the University of South Dakota.
“It doesn’t put them in a position to actually put forward their ideological policy preferences and have much of a success at getting those enacted,” Card said.
In the state Senate alone, Democrats have failed to field a candidate for 22 seats, which is nearly two-thirds of the chamber. In the House, Democrats have failed to field a candidate for 38 seats, which is 54% of the chamber.
There is only one Democratic legislative primary in the state: a state Senate race in District 26, which includes the Rosebud Reservation.
There are no statewide Democratic primaries, after announced candidates for governor and U.S. House dropped out or failed to gather enough petition signatures to make the ballot, leaving one Democrat in each of those races.
Statewide candidates will have less name recognition than Republican candidates ahead of the general election, since they didn’t have primaries, Card said. In the Legislature, Card said Democrats “are guaranteeing they won’t get a majority.”
In contrast, Republicans have primary races for governor, U.S. House and U.S. Senate. Five legislative districts do not have Republican primaries, but do have Republican candidates. There is a Republican candidate running for every legislative seat, except for one House seat in District 27, which includes the Pine Ridge Reservation.
Card said there are several factors leading to poor candidate turnout among Democrats, including a self-fulfilling cycle of failure.
“A lack of winning makes fewer people willing to take a chance on running for office,” Card said. “Why run if I think I’m going to lose?”
Democrats haven’t held a statewide office since 2015, and they haven’t held a majority of either legislative chamber since 1994.
Joe Zweifel, deputy executive director of the South Dakota Democratic Party, said the organization worked “really, really hard” to convince Democrats to run for office.
“But you can’t force people to run for office,” said Zweifel, of Sioux Falls, who’s running for a legislative seat himself in District 12.
He’s heard the open seats called a “failure.” But he disagrees, choosing to focus on the Democrats who did step forward.
“We’re running quality, good candidates in those races,” Zweifel said.
The South Dakota Democratic Party hopes to build on legislative successes, such as a new law from Rep. Kadyn Wittman, D-Sioux Falls, that commits state funding to cover the family portion of reduced-price school meals.
“That specifically is a return on investment for our donors, and it shows that Democrats are doing good things for the people of South Dakota,” Zweifel said.
Wittman’s success helped inspire Democratic District 13 House of Representatives candidate Ali Rae Horsted, of Sioux Falls, to take a second run at the Legislature. Horsted ran unsuccessfully for the Senate against Sen. Sue Peterson in 2024, garnering 42% of the vote.
Horsted plans to build on that success and the name recognition she already has in the district. She hopes she’ll have “better odds” in this election, since there are two House seats for every district.
Horsted said it would better serve South Dakota if the state had a more balanced Legislature. While the latest Legislature was 92% Republican, 52% of voters in South Dakota are Republican. South Dakota has the lowest percentage of Democrats, 7.6%, in the Legislature nationwide.
“I think it’s important that people have options on the ballot,” Horsted said, “and people are able to vote for candidates that represent their values and their vision for the future of South Dakota.”
Makenzie Huber is a lifelong South Dakotan who regularly reports on the intersection of politics and policy with health, education, social services and Indigenous affairs. Her work with South Dakota Searchlight earned her the title of South Dakota’s Outstanding Young Journalist in 2024, and she was a 2024 finalist for the national Livingston Awards.
South Dakota Searchlight is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.
See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.
Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.
Copyright 2026 KOTA. All rights reserved.
South Dakota
From Big Ideas to Better Places: Building Livable Communities Across South Dakota
From East River to West River, South Dakota communities share a common goal: creating places where people of all ages can live, work and thrive. AARP’s Domains of Livability provide a framework to help communities do just that. Through the AARP Community Challenge grant program—designed to spark quick, impactful local projects—South Dakota communities are turning big ideas into visible, people-centered improvements.
Read the South Dakota Community Challenge Grant Report, which showcases grant-funded projects across the state designed to build more livable communities.
What Are AARP’s Domains of Livability?
AARP’s approach to livable communities is rooted in eight interconnected domains that together support quality of life at every age:
- Outdoor Spaces and Buildings – Safe, accessible parks, streets and public buildings
- Transportation – Affordable, accessible options for getting around
- Housing – A range of choices that support independence
- Social Participation – Opportunities to connect, learn and have fun
- Respect and Social Inclusion – Communities that value people of all backgrounds and ages
- Civic Participation and Employment – Meaningful ways to engage and contribute
- Communication and Information – Clear, accessible ways to stay informed
- Community Support and Health Services – Access to services that support well-being
These domains work best when addressed together—something South Dakota communities are embracing.
Turning Vision into Action with Community Challenge Grants
AARP Community Challenge grants fund short-term, “quick-action” projects that can ignite long-term change. Across South Dakota, these grants have helped communities pilot ideas, build momentum and demonstrate what’s possible when residents put people first.
Here’s how local projects are bringing the Domains of Livability to life:
- Outdoor Spaces and Buildings: Communities have used grants to enhance parks, create pop-up public spaces, add benches and shade and install wayfinding signs. These improvements invite people to linger, gather, and enjoy shared spaces—supporting both physical activity and social connection.
- Transportation: Small, thoughtful transportation projects can make a big difference. Community Challenge grants have supported safer crossings, improved walkability and bikeability around key destinations and the planning or installation of transit amenities like shelters and seating—especially important for older adults and people with mobility challenges.
- Housing and Community Support: Some projects focus on helping residents age in place by improving access to information about home modification resources or by testing neighborhood-level solutions that connect people to services. These efforts strengthen independence and peace of mind.
- Social Participation and Inclusion: Murals, community events and creative placemaking projects funded by AARP grants have sparked community pride and social connection. By involving residents in design and implementation, these projects foster respect, inclusion and a strong sense of belonging across generations.
- Communication, Civic Participation and Opportunity: From hosting community conversations to creating new tools for sharing local information, South Dakota communities are using grants to engage residents in shaping their future. These efforts elevate local voices and encourage ongoing civic participation.
-
Texas4 minutes agoTexas A&M Forward Transfer Seemingly on Visit to See Lady Vols Basketball | Rocky Top Insider
-
Utah10 minutes agoGolden Knights vs. Mammoth Game 1 prediction: NHL odds, picks, best bets for Stanley Cup Playoffs
-
Vermont16 minutes agoVermont lawmakers reject digital lottery initiative – Valley News
-
Virginia22 minutes agoVirginia’s special election redistricting battle is next week and has national impacts
-
Washington28 minutes ago
The Church of Jesus Christ has announced its 384th temple
-
Wisconsin34 minutes agoWisconsin authorities put total arrests from clashes at beagle breeding facility at about 25
-
West Virginia40 minutes agoThis week in West Virginia history: April 19-25
-
Wyoming46 minutes agoIdaho semitruck driver involved in fatal accident at Wyoming FlyingJ – East Idaho News