Connect with us

Finance

Wall Street’s 2025 outlook for stocks

Published

on

Wall Street’s 2025 outlook for stocks

The targets range from 6,400 to 7,007. This implies returns between +5% and +15% from Friday’s close. It’s a tighter range than last year’s targets, with many clustering in that 8%-10% return expectation.

Before we move on, I’d once again caution against putting too much weight into one-year targets. It’s extremely difficult to predict short-term moves in the market with any accuracy. Few on Wall Street have ever been able to do this consistently. DataTrek’s Nicholas Colas recently pointed out that the standard deviation around the mean annual total return for the S&P 500 is nearly 20 percentage points! More here.

I do however think the research, analysis, and commentary behind these forecasts can be very informative.

In summary: The fundamentals supporting earnings growth are firm. Valuations are above historical averages but are not cause for alarm. As usual, there’s plenty of uncertainty. But on balance, the outlook for stocks is favorable.

Below is a roundup of 14 of these 2025 targets for the S&P 500, including highlights from the strategists’ commentary.

Advertisement
  • UBS: 6,400, $257 earnings per share (as of Nov. 18): “After a rally this year through Trump’s cabinet appointments, we see mild downside in equities in H1 next year amid a step down in US growth. Once earnings estimates have fallen to more realistic levels, H2 ’25 should be better.”

  • Morgan Stanley: 6,500, $271 (as of Nov. 18): “Looking forward to 2025, we think it will continue to be important for investors to remain nimble around market leadership changes, particularly given the potential uncertainty that the recent election outcome introduces. This is also a reason why we are maintaining a wider than normal bull versus bear-case skew — base case: 6,500; bull case 7,400; bear case 4,600.”

  • Goldman Sachs: 6,500, $268 (as of Nov. 18): “We estimate net margins will expand by 78 bp to 12.3% in 2025 followed by a further 35 bp increase to 12.6% in 2026. Our economists assume the Trump administration will impose targeted tariffs on imported automobiles and select imports from China. They also assume a 15% corporate tax rate on domestic manufacturers. On net, the impact of these policy changes on our EPS forecasts roughly offset one another.”

  • JPMorgan: 6,500, $270 (Nov. 27): “US equities should remain supported by the expanding business cycle, US Exceptionalism that is helping broaden the AI cycle and earnings growth, ongoing easing by global central banks and the wind-down of Fed’s QT in 1Q. At the same time, US households are benefiting from a tight labor market, sitting on record wealth (+$10T over the past year to ~$165T as of 2Q24, +$50T since Covid), and potentially lower energy prices. Heightened geopolitical uncertainty and the evolving policy agenda are introducing unusual complexity to the outlook, but opportunities are likely to outweigh risks. The benefit of deregulation and a more business-friendly environment are likely underestimated along with potential for unlocking productivity gains and capital deployment.”

  • CFRA: 6,585 (as of Nov. 20): “This new target incorporates fundamental, technical, and historical considerations, influenced by a 2.4% projected growth in U.S. real GDP and a 13% rise in S&P 500 operating earnings, supported by a continued decline in inflation readings and interest rates. Historical returns during the third year of bull markets following two successive years of double-digit increases, combined with stretched valuations relative to 10-year averages (using the current forward P/E ratio, market-cap to total revenue, and total enterprise value to forward EBITDA metrics), temper our optimism, leading to the below-average projected full-year price gain.”

  • RBC: 6,600, $271 (as of Nov. 25): “The story the data tells us is that another year of solid economic and earnings growth, some political tailwinds, and some additional relief on inflation (which should keep the S&P 500’s P/E elevated) can keep stocks moving higher in the year ahead.”

  • Barclays: 6,600, $271 (as of Nov. 25): “For U.S. equities, we think macro positives outweigh the negatives heading into next year. … We expect most sectors to be impacted by disinflationary margin pressure and slowing ex-US growth in 2025, while Big Tech continues offsetting to the upside.”

  • BofA: 6,666, $275 (as of Nov. 26): “Get ready for a cyclical inferno. Nine reasons: (1) Red sweep, (2) Fed cuts, (3) accelerating profits, (4) re-shoring, (5) productivity cycle, (6) shift from everyone spending on Tech to Tech spending on everything, (7) municipalities refurbishing to court corporates, (8) tight capacity / decades of underspend in manufacturing, and (9) lightest positioning in cyclical sectors since at least the GFC.”

  • BMO: 6,700, $275 (as of Nov. 18): “Bull markets can, will, and should slow their pace from time to time, a period of digestion that in turn only accentuates the health of the underlying secular bull. So, we believe 2025 will likely be defined by a more normalized return environment with more balanced performance across sectors, sizes, and styles.”

  • HSBC: 6,700 (as of Dec. 6): “We expect next year’s equity returns to be focused on earnings growth as valuations are more stretched… Overall, we expect earnings to grow by 9% incorporating a slower but still resilient U.S. economy and some margin expansion.”

  • Deutsche Bank: 7,000, $282 (as of Nov. 25): “Attention is focused on late cycle indicators, while early cycle indicators have been turning up. We see various aspects of the cycle yet to kick in, including de- to re-stocking; capex outside Tech; capital markets and M&A; loan growth; and rest of the world growth. With potential policy changes by the incoming administration having both positive and negative implications for growth, sequencing will be key, but we expect growth to remain the priority. Over several rounds of the last trade war, escalations saw equity selloffs which then prompted de-escalations.”

  • Yardeni Research: 7,000, $290 (as of Nov. 10): “Just after Donald Trump won the presidential race on November 8, 2016, we observed that the economy and stock market were charged up with “animal spirits,” a term coined by John Maynard Keynes meaning spontaneous optimism. Animal spirits are back now that Trump won a second term on November 5…”

  • Capital Economics: 7,000 (as of Nov. 7): “These projections, which rest on the assumption that the US economy will not stand in the way of a bubble in the stock market inflating amid hype around AI, are looking much less bold than they once did. But we aren’t minded to push up the forecasts just because the index has risen and reacted very favorably to the news of Trump’s victory. A key reason is our view that his policies would be a net negative for growth in the US and elsewhere. What’s more, if we’re right to exclude a major fiscal expansion from our list of working assumptions, US firms’ profits probably won’t get a boost from a further cut in corporation tax. Nonetheless, we are sticking to our existing projections for the S&P 500 because we don’t see Trump’s election derailing the economy or preventing the bubble in AI from inflating.”

  • Wells Fargo: 7,007, $274 (as of Dec. 3): “On balance, we expect the Trump Administration to usher in a macro environment that is increasingly favorable for stocks at a time when the Fed will be slowly reducing rates. In short, a backdrop where equities continue to rally.”

Donald Trump looks on as Fed Chair Jerome Powell speaks at the White House. (REUTERS/Carlos Barria/Archive) · Reuters / Reuters

Most of the equity strategists TKer follows produce incredibly rigorous, high-quality research that reflects a deep understanding of what drives markets. Consequently, the most valuable things these pros have to offer have little to do with one-year targets. (And in my years of interacting with many of these folks, at least a few of them don’t care for the exercise of publishing one-year targets. They do it because it’s popular with clients.)

So first off, don’t dismiss their work just because a one-year target is off the mark.

Second, I’ll repeat what I always say when discussing short-term forecasts for the stock market:

It’s incredibly difficult to predict with any accuracy where the stock market will be in a year. In addition to the countless number of variables to consider, there are also the totally unpredictable developments that occur along the way.

Strategists will often revise their targets as new information comes in. In fact, some of the numbers you see above represent revisions from prior forecasts.

Advertisement

For most of y’all, it’s probably ill-advised to overhaul your entire investment strategy based on a one-year stock market forecast.

Nevertheless, it can be fun to follow these targets. It helps you get a sense of the various Wall Street firms’ level of bullishness or bearishness.

I think RBC’s Lori Calvasina said it best in her outlook report: The price target “should be viewed as a compass as opposed to a GPS. It is a construct that helps to articulate whether we believe stocks will move higher and why.”

Good luck in 2025!

Below is a sampling of what Wall Street is saying about the economy in 2025.

Advertisement
Nora Carol Photography via Getty Images

BofA (Dec. 2): “We expect stable growth (2.3% in 2025, 2.0% in 2026), slightly elevated inflation (2.5-3%) and a terminal rate of 3.75-4%. Cuts in Dec, Mar, Jun. Even before tariffs or fiscal easing, data warrant slower cuts. The US economy went into the elections with structural and cyclical tailwinds. Structural: productivity and potential growth appear to have picked up, supporting higher policy rates. Cyclical: consumer remarkably resilient. Solid real income growth, healthy balance sheets. Fiscal policy has buoyed private and public investment. The labor market is the main concern. Bad news: narrow and slowing job gains, downward revisions, Sahm rule triggered, falling vacancies. Good news: low layoffs (and claims)…”

Deutsche Bank (Nov. 25): “We ultimately anticipate that modest tax cuts, a strong deregulation push, and more supportive financial conditions will produce faster growth in 2025, which we now see at 2.5% (Q4/Q4) versus 2.2% previously. Beyond next year, adverse effects from the trade war and a more restrictive monetary policy setting reduce our growth estimates modestly.”

Goldman Sachs (Nov. 17): “The Republican sweep in the recent elections will likely bring policy changes in three key areas. First, we expect tariff increases on imports from China and autos that raise the effective tariff rate by 3-4pp. Second, we expect tighter policy to lower net immigration to 750k per year, moderately below the pre-pandemic average of 1mn per year. Third, we expect full extension of the expiring 2017 tax cuts and modest additional tax cuts. These changes are significant, but we do not expect them to substantially alter the trajectory of the economy or monetary policy.”

JPMorgan (Nov. 21): “The election has sparked dueling boom-bust narratives on the path ahead. There are now upside risks to growth from deregulation and tax cutting and downside risks from tariffs and general policy uncertainty. But one shouldn’t lose sight of the business cycle, which has been performing well. We look for only a mild downshift in growth in 2025 to 2%, with a small additional rise in the unemployment rate to 4.5%. Core PCE inflation expected to decelerate a half-point next year to 2.3%. We look for the Fed to cut 25bps in December and another 75bps by the end of 3Q25, then stop at 3.75%.”

Morgan Stanley (Nov. 17): “Lower immigration flows and more tariffs slow GDP growth and make inflation stickier. Nascent inflationary pressures and broad policy uncertainty spark greater Fed caution, leading to a pause in 2Q. As higher tariffs hit growth and job gains almost stop in 2H26, rate cuts resume.”

UBS (Nov. 8): “We expect the new administration is inheriting a moderate economic slowdown, and as it is, the pace of nonfarm payroll employment gains has slowed from the brisk over 200K per month pace of 2023, to 148K per month over the six months ending in September. Inflation progress is projected to resume as we move through 2025. We expect that backdrop keeps the FOMC on track for lowering rates. Many crosscurrents such as potential deregulation and slower population growth move into the mix, with uncertain net impacts. We assume fiscal policy changes largely affect 2026 and beyond, based on existing agreements for the fiscal year ending in September 2025. The new tariffs we expect to be phased in with mostly a 2026 impact too. However, we did take out one rate cut in 2025, leaving monetary policy the tiniest bit more restrictive as the rollout of China tariffs begins.”

Advertisement

Wells Fargo (Nov. 21): “American trade policy likely will change in a more restrictive direction. During his campaign for president, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to impose a 10% across-the-board tariff with a 60% levy applied to China. The cost of tariffs, which are a tax on imported goods, are generally borne by consumers. Tariff increases of Trump’s threatened magnitude would lead to a marked increase in inflation next year, while significantly reducing the rate of economic growth, not only in the United States but in many foreign economies as well. We have bumped up our U.S. inflation forecast for next year, while shaving down our U.S. real GDP growth outlook.”

There were a few notable data points and macroeconomic developments from last week to consider:

👍 The labor market continues to add jobs. According to the BLS’s Employment Situation report released Friday, U.S. employers added 227,000 jobs in November. The report reflected the 47th straight month of gains, reaffirming an economy with growing demand for labor.

Total payroll employment is at a record 159.3 million jobs, up 7 million from the prepandemic high.

The unemployment rate — that is, the number of workers who identify as unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force — ticked up to 4.2% during the month. While it continues to hover near 50-year lows, the metric is near its highest level since October 2021.

Advertisement

While the major metrics continue to reflect job growth and low unemployment, the labor market isn’t as hot as it used to be.

Wage growth ticks lower. Average hourly earnings rose by 0.37% month-over-month in November, down from the 0.42% pace in October. On a year-over-year basis, this metric is up 4.0%.

Job openings rise. According to the BLS’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, employers had 7.74 million job openings in October, up from 7.37 million in September.

During the period, there were 6.98 million unemployed people — meaning there were 1.1 job openings per unemployed person. This continues to be one of the more obvious signs of excess demand for labor. However, this metric has returned to prepandemic levels.

Layoffs remain depressed, hiring remains firm. Employers laid off 1.63 million people in October. While challenging for all those affected, this figure represents just 1.0% of total employment. This metric remains at pre-pandemic levels.

Advertisement

Hiring activity continues to be much higher than layoff activity. During the month, employers hired 5.31 million people.

That said, the hiring rate — the number of hires as a percentage of the employed workforce — has been trending lower, which could be a sign of trouble to come in the labor market.

People are quitting less. In October, 3.33 million workers quit their jobs. This represents 2.1% of the workforce. While the rate ticked up last month, it continues to trend below prepandemic levels.

A low quits rate could mean a number of things: more people are satisfied with their job; workers have fewer outside job opportunities; wage growth is cooling; productivity will improve as fewer people are entering new unfamiliar roles.

Job switchers still get better pay. According to ADP, which tracks private payrolls and employs a different methodology than the BLS, annual pay growth in November for people who changed jobs was up 7.2% from a year ago. For those who stayed at their job, pay growth was 4.8%

Advertisement

Unemployment claims tick higher. Initial claims for unemployment benefits rose to 224,000 during the week ending November 30, up from 215,000 the week prior. This metric continues to be at levels historically associated with economic growth.

Consumer vibes improve. From the University of Michigan’s December Surveys of Consumers: “Consumer sentiment improved for the fifth consecutive month, rising about 3% to its highest reading in seven months. A surge in buying conditions for durables led Current Economic Conditions to soar more than 20%. Rather than a sign of strength, this rise in durables was primarily due to a perception that purchasing durables now would enable buyers to avoid future price increases.”

Consumer sentiment readings have lagged resilient consumer spending data.

Politics clearly plays a role in peoples’ perception of the economy: “The expectations index continued the post-election re-calibration that began last month, climbing for Republicans and declining for Democrats in December. Independents were, as usual, in the middle between the two major parties, with readings close to the national average. This adjustment process is consistent with a response to actual underlying changes in expectations for the national economy, and not merely an expression of partisanship. For example, throughout this month’s interviews, Democrats voiced concerns that anticipated policy changes, particularly tariff hikes, would lead to a resurgence in inflation. Republicans disagreed; they expect the next president will usher in an immense slowdown in inflation. As such, national measures of sentiment and expectations continue to reflect the collective economic experiences and observations of the American population as a whole.”

Notably, expectations for inflation appear to be a partisan matter.

Advertisement

Card spending data is holding up. From BofA: “In the week ending Nov 30, retail ex-autos spending per HH was up 2.0% vs. the week ending the day after Black Friday in 2023. Online retail spending was particularly strong around the Thanksgiving period, while brick & mortar retail was soft. A later Thanksgiving this year means we need to wait at least another week to get a clean read on holiday spending.”

From JPMorgan: “As of 29 Nov 2024, our Chase Consumer Card spending data (unadjusted) was 1.9% above the same day last year. Based on the Chase Consumer Card data through 29 Nov 2024, our estimate of the US Census November control measure of retail sales m/m is 0.28%.”

Gas prices tick lower. From AAA: “Like a glacier grinding its way to the sea, the national average for a gallon of gas is closing in on the $3 mark, shedding three cents since last week to $3.03. It has been less than a dime away from $3 for over a month as the waffling decline has been agonizingly slow. The last time the national average was below $3 was May 11, 2021.”

Mortgage rates tick lower. According to Freddie Mac, the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage fell to 6.69%, down from 6.81% last week. From Freddie Mac: “This week, mortgage rates decreased to their lowest level in over a month. Despite just a modest drop in rates, consumers clearly have responded as purchase demand has noticeably improved. The responsiveness of prospective homebuyers to even small changes in rates illustrates that affordability headwinds persist.”

There are 147 million housing units in the U.S., of which 86.6 million are owner-occupied and 34 million (or 40%) of which are mortgage-free. Of those carrying mortgage debt, almost all have fixed-rate mortgages, and most of those mortgages have rates that were locked in before rates surged from 2021 lows. All of this is to say: Most homeowners are not particularly sensitive to movements in home prices or mortgage rates.

Advertisement

Offices remain relatively empty. From Kastle Systems: “Peak day office occupancy was 57% on Thursday last week, as many workers stayed home in the days leading up to Thanksgiving. Tuesday occupancy was down 18.9 points to 42.8%, and even Monday fell more than seven points, down to 41.8%. The average low was 26.4% on Wednesday, less than half of the prior week’s 61.1%.”

Supply chain pressures remain loose. The New York Fed’s Global Supply Chain Pressure Index — a composite of various supply chain indicators — ticked higher in November but remains near historically normal levels. It’s way down from its December 2021 supply chain crisis high.

Business investment activity trends at record levels. Orders for nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft — a.k.a. core capex or business investment — declined 0.6% to $73.7 billion in October.

Core capex orders are a leading indicator, meaning they foretell economic activity down the road. While the growth rate has leveled off a bit, they continue to signal economic strength in the months to come.

Services surveys still point to growth. From S&P Global’s November Services PMI: “Companies have reported stronger demand for services thanks to the clearing of political uncertainty following the election, as well as brighter prospects for the economy in 2025 linked to the incoming administration and hopes for lower interest rates. The latter, alongside strong market gains in recent weeks, has helped drive an especially strong surge in demand for financial services, though November also saw robust growth for business and consumer services.”

Advertisement

The ISM Services PMI reflected growth but at a cooling rate.

Manufacturing surveys look less bad. From S&P Global’s November Manufacturing PMI: “Optimism about the year ahead has improved to a level not beaten in two and a half years, buoyed by the lifting of uncertainty seen in the lead up to the election, as well as the prospect of stronger economic growth and greater protectionism against foreign competition under the new Trump administration in 2025.”

Similarly, the ISM’s November Manufacturing PMI improved from the prior month.

Keep in mind that during times of perceived stress, soft survey data tends to be more exaggerated than actual hard data.

Construction spending ticks higher. Construction spending increased 0.4% to an annual rate of $2.17 trillion in October.

Advertisement

Near-term GDP growth estimates remain positive. The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model sees real GDP growth climbing at a 3.3% rate in Q4.

Putting it all together

The long-term outlook for the stock market remains favorable, bolstered by expectations for years of earnings growth. And earnings are the most important driver of stock prices.

Demand for goods and services is positive, and the economy continues to grow. At the same time, economic growth has normalized from much hotter levels earlier in the cycle. The economy is less “coiled” these days as major tailwinds like excess job openings have faded.

To be clear: The economy remains very healthy, supported by strong consumer and business balance sheets. Job creation remains positive. And the Federal Reserve — having resolved the inflation crisis — has shifted its focus toward supporting the labor market.

Advertisement

We are in an odd period given that the hard economic data has decoupled from the soft sentiment-oriented data. Consumer and business sentiment has been relatively poor, even as tangible consumer and business activity continue to grow and trend at record levels. From an investor’s perspective, what matters is that the hard economic data continues to hold up.

Analysts expect the U.S. stock market could outperform the U.S. economy, thanks largely due to positive operating leverage. Since the pandemic, companies have adjusted their cost structures aggressively. This has come with strategic layoffs and investment in new equipment, including hardware powered by AI. These moves are resulting in positive operating leverage, which means a modest amount of sales growth — in the cooling economy — is translating to robust earnings growth.

Of course, this does not mean we should get complacent. There will always be risks to worry about — such as U.S. political uncertainty, geopolitical turmoil, energy price volatility, cyber attacks, etc. There are also the dreaded unknowns. Any of these risks can flare up and spark short-term volatility in the markets.

There’s also the harsh reality that economic recessions and bear markets are developments that all long-term investors should expect to experience as they build wealth in the markets. Always keep your stock market seat belts fastened.

For now, there’s no reason to believe there’ll be a challenge that the economy and the markets won’t be able to overcome over time. The long game remains undefeated, and it’s a streak long-term investors can expect to continue.

Advertisement

A version of this story first appeared at TKer.co

Finance

Holyoke City Council sends finance overhaul plan to committee for review

Published

on

Holyoke City Council sends finance overhaul plan to committee for review

HOLYOKE — The City Council has advanced plans to create a finance and administration department, voting to send proposed changes to a subcommittee for further review.

The move follows guidance from the state Division of Local Services aimed at strengthening the city’s internal cash controls, defining clear lines of accountability, and making sure staff have the appropriate education and skill level for their financial roles.

On Tuesday, Councilor Meg Magrath-Smith, who filed the order, said the council needed to change some wording about qualifications based on advice from the human resources department before sending it to the ordinance committee for review.

The committee will discuss and vote on the matter before it can head back to the full City Council for a vote. It meets next Tuesday. The next council meeting is scheduled for Jan. 20.

On Monday, Mayor Joshua Garcia said in his inaugural address that he plans to continue advancing his Municipal Finance Modernization Act.

Advertisement

Last spring, Garcia introduced two budget plans: one showing the current $180 million cost of running the city, and another projecting savings if Holyoke adopted the finance act.

Key proposed changes include realigning departments to meet modern needs, renaming positions and reassigning duties, fixing problems found in decades of audits, and using technology to improve workflow and service.

Garcia said the plan aims to also make government more efficient and accountable by boosting oversight of the mayor and finance departments, requiring audits of all city functions, enforcing penalties for policy violations, and adding fraud protections with stronger reporting.

Other steps included changing the city treasurer from an elected to an appointed position, a measure approved in a special election last January.

Additionally, the city would adopt a financial management policies manual, create a consolidated Finance Department and hire a chief administrative and financial officer to handle forecasting, capital planning and informed decision-making.

Advertisement

Garcia said that the state has suggested creating the CAFO position for almost 20 years and called on the City Council to pass the reform before the end of this fiscal year, so that it can be in place by July 1.

In a previous interview, City Council President Tessa Murphy-Romboletti said nine votes were needed to adopt the financial reform.

She also said past problems stemmed from a lack of proper systems and checks, an issue the city has dealt with since the 1970s.

The mayor would choose this officer, and the City Council will approve the appointment, she said.

In October, the City Council narrowly rejected the finance act in an 8-5 vote.

Advertisement

Supporters ― Michael Sullivan, Israel Rivera, Jenny Rivera, Murphy-Romboletti, Anderson Burgos, former Councilor Kocayne Givner, Patti Devine and Magrath-Smith ― said the city needs modernization and greater transparency.

Opponents ― Howard Greaney Jr., Linda Vacon, former Councilors David Bartley, Kevin Jourdain and Carmen Ocasio — said a qualified treasurer should be appointed first.

Vacon said then the treasurer’s office was “a mess,” and that the city should “fix” one department before “mixing it with another.”

The City Council also clashed over fixes, as the state stopped sending millions in monthly aid because the city hadn’t finished basic financial paperwork for three years.

The main problem came from delays in financial reports from the treasurer’s office.

Advertisement

Holyoke had a history of late filings. For six of the past eight years, the city delayed its required annual financial report, and five times in the past, the state withheld aid.

Council disputes over job descriptions, salaries and reforms also stalled progress.

In November, millions in state aid began flowing back to Holyoke after the city made some progress in closing out its books.

The state had withheld nearly $29 million for four months but even with aid restored, Holyoke still faces big financial problems, the Division of Local Services said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Military Troops and Retirees: Here’s the First Financial Step to Take in 2026

Published

on

Military Troops and Retirees: Here’s the First Financial Step to Take in 2026

Editor’s note: This is the fourth installment of New Year, New You, a weeklong look at your financial health headed into 2026. 

You get your W-2 in January and realize you either owe thousands in taxes or get a massive refund. Both mean your withholding was wrong all year.

Most service members set their tax withholding once during in-processing and never look at it again. Life changes. You get married, have kids, buy a house or pick up a second job. Your tax situation changes, but your withholding stays the same.

Adjusting your withholding takes five minutes and can save you from owing the IRS or giving the government an interest-free loan all year.

Use the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator First

Before changing anything, run your numbers through the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator at www.irs.gov/individuals/tax-withholding-estimator. The calculator asks about your filing status, income, current withholding, deductions and credits. It tells you whether you need to adjust.

Advertisement

The calculator considers multiple jobs, spouse income and other factors that affect your tax bill. Running it takes about 10 minutes and prevents you from withholding too much or too little.

Read More: The Cost of Skipping Sick Call: How Active-Duty Service Members Can Protect Future VA Claims

Changing Withholding in myPay (Most Services)

Army, Navy, Air Force, Space Force and Marine Corps members use myPay at mypay.dfas.mil. Log in and click Federal Withholding. Click the yellow pencil icon to edit.

The page lets you enter information about multiple jobs, change dependents, add additional income, make deductions or withhold extra tax. You can see when the changes take effect on the blue bar at the top of the page.

Changes typically show up on your next pay statement. If you make changes early in the month, they might appear on your mid-month paycheck. If you make them later, expect them on the end-of-month check.

Advertisement

State tax withholding works differently. DFAS can only withhold for states with signed agreements. Changes require submitting DD Form 2866 through myPay or by mail. Not all states allow DFAS to withhold state tax.

Changing Withholding in Direct Access (Coast Guard)

Coast Guard members use Direct Access at hcm.direct-access.uscg.mil. The system processes changes the same way as myPay. Log in, navigate to tax withholding and update your information.

Coast Guard members can also submit written requests using IRS Form W-4. Mail completed forms to the Pay and Personnel Center in Topeka, Kansas, or submit them through your Personnel and Administration office.

Read More: Here’s Why January Is the Best Time to File Your VA Disability Claim

When to Adjust Withholding

Check your withholding when major life events happen. Marriage or divorce changes your filing status. Having kids adds dependents. Buying a house affects deductions. A spouse starting or stopping work changes household income.

Advertisement

Military-specific events matter, too. Deploying to a combat zone makes some pay tax-free. PCS moves change state tax situations. Separation from service means losing military income but potentially gaining civilian income.

Check at the start of each year, even if your circumstances seemingly stayed the same. Tax laws change. Brackets adjust for inflation. Your situation might be different even if it seems the same.

The Balance

Withholding too little means owing taxes in April plus potential penalties. Withholding too much means getting a refund but losing access to that money all year.

Some people like big refunds and treat it like forced savings. Others would rather have the money in each paycheck to pay bills, invest or set aside in normal savings.

Neither approach is wrong. What matters is that your withholding matches your tax situation and your preference for how you receive your money.

Advertisement

Run the estimator. Adjust your withholding. Check it annually. This simple process prevents tax surprises.

Previously In This series:

Part 1: 2026 Guide to Pay and Allowances for Military Service Members, Veterans and Retirees

Part 2: Understanding All the Deductions on Your 2026 Military Leave and Earnings Statements

Part 3: Should You Let the Military Set Aside Allotments from Your Pay?

Part 4: This Is the Best Thing to Do With Your 2026 Military Pay Raise

Advertisement

Stay on Top of Your Veteran Benefits

Military benefits are always changing. Keep up with everything from pay to health care by subscribing to Military.com, and get access to up-to-date pay charts and more with all latest benefits delivered straight to your inbox.

Story Continues

Continue Reading

Finance

The case against saving when building a business

Published

on

The case against saving when building a business
Listen and subscribe to The Big Idea with Elizabeth Gore on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you find your favorite podcast.Would you rather play it safe, or grow your business? This expert breaks down why investing is everything.This week on The Big Idea with Elizabeth Gore, Howard Enterprise founder and the Wall Street Trapper Leon Howard joins the show to answer the question: How can I use a Wall Street mindset for my business? Howard offers expert insight on why it is absolutely critical that founders take risks and invest capital, versus just saving.To learn more, click here. Yahoo Finance’s The Big Idea with Elizabeth Gore takes you on a journey with America’s entrepreneurs as they navigate the world of small business. This post was written by Lauren Pokedoff
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending