Connect with us

Alaska

Incoming Alaska Supreme Court chief justice applauds first female majority

Published

on

Incoming Alaska Supreme Court chief justice applauds first female majority



Alaska Supreme Court Justice Susan Carney. (Alaska Court System)

Alaska’s highest court will have a new chief justice in January, and for the first time in its history, the court will be majority female.

Justice Susan Carney has served on the Alaska Supreme Court since 2016, and fellow justices recently selected her to be chief justice when current Chief Justice Peter Maassen retires in mid-January. Gov. Mike Dunleavy also announced this week the appointment of Aimee Anderson Oravec to fill Maassen’s seat, meaning the state’s high court will be comprised of three women and two men.

Carney, a longtime Fairbanks resident and former public defender, describes the female majority as a historic and remarkable occasion.

Advertisement

Listen:

[Sign up for Alaska Public Media’s daily newsletter to get our top stories delivered to your inbox.]

This interview has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

Susan Carney: I mean, personally, I think that’s great. I think it’s important for any court and any court system to reflect the community that it serves. Male judges have dominated the court system since it was created, and it’s about time that, at least for a bit, there’s a majority of women on the Supreme Court. The Court of Appeals previously was all women, until a fourth judge was added. As a woman, I’m pretty happy about it. I’m also happy to have another Fairbanks justice. This is also the first time that the court will have a majority of justices not in Anchorage.

Casey Grove: Yeah, that is interesting. So in this role as Chief Justice, you’re the head administrator for the judicial branch of the state. Justice Maassen had delivered the State of the Judiciary (speech) last year, and Chief Justice Winfree before that. And I think both of them mentioned some challenges. One of those challenges was just access to the judicial system, and I think that means both buildings and in other ways. Where are we at with that?

Advertisement

SC: You know, somewhat strangely, some of the things that we learned during the pandemic have really helped that. I practiced in Fairbanks my whole career as a public defender. I had lots and lots of cases in remote villages. And number one, there aren’t courthouses in really small villages. We try to have at least a part-time magistrate judge in the bigger hub communities. But for people that live in real small, remote villages, getting physically to a court is difficult at best and often impossible. So we’ve learned so much about using technology that makes it much easier for people to appear in court by video, which is dramatically better than calling in by phone, so that right there makes a big difference in people’s access.

CG: And I guess another challenge that has come up just since the pandemic is this backlog of cases. And I think that’s been mentioned every year since the pandemic started, basically. But where are we at with that? And I guess in your role, I mean, how do you look at that?

SC: You know, the whole court system is really devoted to trying to cut this backlog, and we’ve made real strides at every level. Our Judicial Conference at the end of October had an entire day devoted to, you know, “Here are concrete things that all of us, judges at every level, can do to try and move these things along.” And we really have made a significant step toward cutting down the backlog, which is not to say it isn’t still there, but we really are working toward it.

CG: Yeah. You know, I saw in the bio that the court system sent out about your selection to be the chief justice that you have a strong history in sports, in softball and basketball and soccer. And I wonder, through your career, have you learned lessons from participating in team sports that have, you know, maybe helped you with your work?

SC: Absolutely, and I think most surprisingly and most relevant to this job, when I interviewed with the governor for this job, I was asked, why could I possibly think I could do this? Because I’ve been a public defender forever, doing almost exclusively criminal matters, and the Supreme Court doesn’t. The Court of Appeals gets all the criminal matters. And what I said was there are five people on this court, which is like a basketball team, and different justices bring different experience the same way different roles on a basketball team are filled by tall people or short people, or the one that can pass the best. And pretty much from that moment on, the conversation and interview revolved around basketball.

Advertisement

CG: He probably gets asked a lot if he plays or played basketball, I imagine.

SC: And Gov. (Bill) Walker, at one point, was asking me, “Well, I’ve played it, I grew up and I played in these villages. Did you play in those villages?” No, but, you know, I’ve played in Anaktuvuk for a number of years.

CG: Yeah. I wanted to ask you about something related to the governor’s office, and, I mean, the current administration. There was a dispute, if you want to call it that — or maybe dissatisfaction, I think is the way some people described it — a few years ago about the selection process for judges, and I think including Supreme Court justices, in that the governor and some others had expressed dissatisfaction about that process, that there’s only the three names that get recommended by the Alaska Judicial Council. Side note, the Chief Justice is a deciding vote on that council. Do you see that issue as being settled? Is that going to come back? I mean, do you think that’s something you’ll have to deal with eventually?

SC: It may come back. I don’t really have a crystal ball. I know that there are people that feel strongly that having a different process for selecting judges would be better. My understanding of how we got to where we are, boiled down to its most basic, is because we came into the United States so late, we had the ability — we, meaning the constitutional delegates — to look at what every other state had done, except for Hawaii, and figure out what they thought was the best way to pick it. And they put a lot of time and effort into it.

I think it works well. I think that it’s important for judges to not be political. Our ethical standards require us not to. We cannot be swayed by political concerns or favoritism for a litigant or our emotions. And this process, by and large, takes out the political nature of who gets to be a judge. You know, the governor ultimately gets to pick, and the governor, of course, is a politician.

Advertisement

CG: One thing I really wanted to ask you, as we’ve been watching oral arguments here recently, like with the United States Supreme Court, we kind of get an idea of what the justices are thinking based on the questions that they ask the folks giving oral arguments. But then, when you make a decision, or before you make a decision on a case, there’s conference between the justices, and that’s not something that we get to see. I just wonder, what is that like? I mean, are those arguments? Are they heated? What is it like?

SC: Rarely. It’s very cordial, really, somewhat formal, particularly for me, having come from a public defender agency where things are not formal. It is at times somewhat emotional, where people vehemently believe in a position, but it is always, always polite. It is rarely heated. I can’t remember more than a handful of times in the time I’ve been on the court where anyone’s voice was actually raised at another justice.

CG: Maybe cordial, but does it get contentious?

SC: I mean, it can, and if there really are just fundamental disagreements that will lead to there being an opinion in the case and a dissent. That really doesn’t happen very much here, you know, certainly not in comparison to the United States Supreme Court, where there are certain cases that people can look at and pretty accurately predict that there will be a majority and there will be a dissent, and who will be in which. We work hard to not dissent, unless it’s really critical. People are asking us to answer a particular question, and they want the right answer for it. And if there is a right answer, there shouldn’t be a couple of them or three of them. If there really is a correct answer, we should be able to get together and figure out what it is, and then make that clear to people.

CG: That’s interesting. It does, you know, from the outside, seem very different than the U.S. Supreme Court.

Advertisement

You know, I know the Supreme Court deals with actual legal marital disputes, but, you know, I wonder, do people hear what you do for a living, do they bring their trivial disputes to you? You know, like, should the toilet paper be put on this way or that way?

SC: No, I don’t think people ask me about legal things much. Nowhere near as much as they did when I was a public defender. And then there would be a steady stream of friends that would say, “I don’t know any ‘real’ lawyers, so let me ask you this.”

CG: Oh, come on! But you are a real lawyer!


a portrait of a man outside

Casey Grove is host of Alaska News Nightly, a general assignment reporter and an editor at Alaska Public Media. Reach him atcgrove@alaskapublic.org. Read more about Caseyhere





Source link

Advertisement

Alaska

Jessie Holmes repeats as Iditarod champion

Published

on

Jessie Holmes repeats as Iditarod champion


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Jessie Holmes is back again as Iditarod champion.

Jesse Holmes wins second consecutive Iditarod(AKNS)

The field of mushers and the elements threw everything at Holmes, but he never flinched, crossing under the burled arch at 9:32 p.m. Tuesday to claim his second consecutive Iditarod victory.

Holmes led the race ever since he passed Cantwell veteran Paige Drobny on the trail between Cripple and Ruby, where he claimed the “First to the Yukon” prize, a gourmet five-course meal.

The Brushkana veteran maintained a strong presence at the front of the field throughout the roughly 1,000-mile endurance race that was inspired by the vaunted “Serum Run” of 1925.

Advertisement

Last year, Holmes emerged victorious in the wee hours of the night to claim his first Iditarod title in a finishing time of 10 days, 14 hours, 55 minutes, 44 seconds.

That was on a revised course that started in Fairbanks, due to bad snow conditions.

This year, he completed the full — true — course that winds its way from Willow to Nome.

With the victory, Holmes joins a short list of mushers who repeated as champion one year after winning their first — Susan Butcher and Lance Mackey are the only other ones to accomplish that feat.

As a regular on the reality TV show “Life Below Zero” — which follows subsistence hunters in rural Alaska — Holmes has now put himself into the record books of multi-time Iditarod champions.

Advertisement

Jesse Holmes Iditarod history

He’s now finished in the top 10 seven times out of nine attempts, including top-5 finishes in each of the past five years.

Year Place Time
2018 7th 9 days, 23 hours, 39 minutes
2019 27th 11 days, 22 hours, 41 minutes
2020 9th 9 days, 11 hours, 9 minutes
2021 15th 8 days, 11 hours, 29 minutes
2022 3rd 9 days, 4 hours, 39 minutes
2023 5th 9 days, 4 hours, 8 minutes
2024 3rd 9 days, 8 hours, 18 minutes
2025 1st 10 days, 14 hours, 55 minutes
2026 1st 9 days, 7 hours, 32 minutes

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Federal program poised to provide $629M to boost internet access across Alaska

Published

on

Federal program poised to provide 9M to boost internet access across Alaska


A Starlink satellite internet antenna sits outside a house on May 17, 2023 in Bethel, Alaska. (Loren Holmes / ADN)

The state has won a key federal approval for its plan to award nearly $630 million to more than a dozen companies to help modernize internet service in Alaska.

The money represents the largest single chunk of federal funds ever committed to improving online access across the state, officials said.

It will extend high-speed internet to more than 46,000 homes and businesses in the state, bringing at least 100 megabyte download speeds to areas currently considered “unserved” or “underserved” when it comes to digital connectivity.

Many are located in rural sections of the state. But the program will also be deployed in the outskirts of Anchorage and other cities, improving service to houses and cellphones.

Advertisement

Once built, the projects will transform life even in Alaska’s most remote corners, Gov. Mike Dunleavy said in a statement.

“This will open up new opportunities for Alaskans to access jobs and education, start new businesses, and connect with healthcare providers in real time, which has not been possible until now,” he said.

The money is part of the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program, or BEAD.

Created in the bipartisan, Biden-era infrastructure bill, it seeks to bridge the nation’s digital divide.

The Alaska Broadband Office still awaits one last federal approval that’s viewed as a formality, officials say. But the 15 award recipients, ranging from the state’s largest telecommunications company to small tribal entities, should begin receiving final approval for the awards in the coming months, they say.

Advertisement

The companies plan 29 projects to deliver fiber, wireless or satellite services, or hybrid versions.

Large providers, such as GCI and Alaska Communications, are on deck to receive more than $100 million apiece under the program.

Tiny entities are poised to also receive grants, such as the tribal government for Atka in the Aleutian Islands, set for a $4.9 million grant to deliver wireless service to 432 homes and businesses.

Christine O’Connor — head of the Alaska Telecom Association, which represents many telecommunications providers — said internet service has improved a lot in Alaska.

Two other federal programs, ReConnect and Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program, have together injected about $1 billion into the state in recent years, she said.

Advertisement

Those were also supported with funding from the infrastructure act.

O’Connor said this latest funding will help complete the build-out. It represents the largest federal investment at one time for improving digital connectivity in Alaska, she said.

Dozens of communities in the state still have extremely limited internet service, she said.

This will change that, allowing many families for the first time to do things like stream video-conference calls with multiple people, download movies or better promote their businesses on social media.

“If you’ve got really slow or no internet, and then all of a sudden you have a 100-megabit minimum speed, that goes from being barely able to function in the digital landscape of our world to having complete access,” she said.

Advertisement

“So it’s night and day when you think of everything we do online these days,” she said.

SpaceX among the winners

Space Exploration Technologies, the owner of Starlink, is set to receive $23.6 million to deliver service to more than 15,000 homes and businesses across the state.

The win for SpaceX came after the Trump administration revised rules to create what it described as a technology neutral program that gave satellite-based providers a better chance of winning a grants over fiber, considered the gold standard for internet service.

O’Connor said that even without that revision, satellite-based internet would have been part of the grant-supported programs in Alaska, given the state’s many far-flung communities.

“It’s not cost effective or even possible to reach everyone without using some satellite capacity,” she said.

Advertisement

U.S. Commerce Assistant Secretary Arielle Roth recently approved the state’s $629 million in proposed awards, the state said in a prepared statement.

The awards still must be approved by National Institute of Standards and Technology, a federal agency, O’Connor said. But that’s expected to be a routine review, she said.

After that, the state will have six months to finalize the contracts, which then will start the clock on a four-year period for providers to complete the projects, she said.

In total, Alaska has been allocated $1 billion under the program.

The federal government has not yet said exactly how the remainder of the state’s allocation can be spent, O’Connor said. It will also support broadband access.

Advertisement

Alaska Republican Sens. Dan Sullivan and Lisa Murkowski praised the approval of the state’s program, in a prepared statement. They had joined the late Republican Rep. Don Young in voting for the infrastructure act in 2021.

“These funds will go a long way toward the goal of connecting every Alaskan” and unlock telehealth, education and business opportunities, Sullivan said.

“Importantly, it will better allow Alaskans to connect with one another,” he said.

GCI will expand rural network

GCI, Alaska’s largest telecommunications company, is set to receive three grants, said Megan Webb, a spokesperson.

She said federal approval of the state’s proposal is a “major milestone for Alaska.”

Advertisement

It comes after years of planning by telecommunications companies, she said.

The largest grant to GCI, at $115 million, will help expand the company’s rural Airraq network, adding 16 villages in Southwest Alaska, Webb said.

The plan involves hybrid services using fiber and microwave, to improve slow internet speeds in those communities, she said.

The locations include Mountain Village, Chefornak, St. Mary’s, Mekoryuk, Kipnuk, Goodnews Bay and Togiak, she said.

The company also won two additional grants, totaling almost $6 million, to improve service on the fringes of Anchorage and Eagle River.

Advertisement

That will be useful for first responders in remote areas, cellphone users and households, she said.

“It will improve access to broadband and support improved mobile connectivity in Ship Creek, Bear Valley, Rabbit Creek and the south fork of Eagle River,” she said.

ACS adding thousands of homes

Alaska Communications is set to receive three grants totaling more than $123 million.

The company plans to deliver fiber and advanced wireless infrastructure to over 9,000 homes and businesses. It also plans to invest $26.7 million of its own capital to extend broadband to an additional 12,000 locations, said Heather Cavanaugh, a spokesperson.

The expansion will deliver speeds of up to a gigabyte in Anchorage, Bird Creek and Indian; along with communities on the Kenai Peninsula, such as Hope, and Kodiak Island, Cavanaugh said. Fairbanks, Manley Hot Springs, Salcha and Delta Junction areas will also see the improved service.

Advertisement

“This investment will make a real difference for families, students, healthcare providers and entrepreneurs who rely on strong connectivity to thrive,” said Paul Fenaroli, president of Alaska Communications, in a prepared statement.

Quintillion has been selected for two projects totaling $48 million, to extend its Arctic fiber network in the Lower Yukon region and on St. Lawrence Island.

“In the Lower Yukon region, Quintillion will extend connections from its Nome-to-Homer Express fiber backbone and build local fiber networks within each community,” said Michael “Mac” McHale, president of the company.

“Some locations will connect to the backbone through existing microwave links, while others will connect directly via fiber,” he said in a prepared statement.

“On St. Lawrence Island, the project will deploy fiber-to-the-home networks supported by satellite backhaul due to the island’s remote location,” he said.

Advertisement

SpitwSpots, launched about 20 years ago to provide hotspot service on the Homer spit, is set to receive $16.7 million. It will also invest some of its own capital to support the project.

The company plans to provide fixed wireless service in the Matanuska Valley, Kenai and Kodiak areas, state records show.

SpitwSpots, whose programs include discounted or free service for low-income households, has recently expanded into the Anchorage market, said Aaron Larson, the company’s founder.

He said there are over 2,000 unserved houses and buildings in Anchorage.

“You’d be surprised,” he said. “There’s a lot of places that don’t have any access to internet, or only have access to DSL,” he said, referring to old, slow digital subscriber lines.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Utah banned another book from all public schools, bringing the list to 28. Here’s what it’s about.

Published

on

Utah banned another book from all public schools, bringing the list to 28. Here’s what it’s about.


“Looking for Alaska,” by John Green, was added to Utah’s growing list of prohibited titles.

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) People read together in the Capitol Rotunda as part of a read-in to protest Utah book bans, hosted by Let Utah Read, in Salt Lake City on Friday, Feb. 13, 2026.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending