Connect with us

Vermont

As Vermont’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission lays out its plans, it faces renewed criticism from Abenaki leaders – VTDigger

Published

on

As Vermont’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission lays out its plans, it faces renewed criticism from Abenaki leaders – VTDigger


Chief Brenda Gagne of the St. Francis/Sokoki Band of Missisquoi Abenaki, listens as the Abenaki Circle of Courage, comprised of Franklin County middle and high school students, beat a drum while singing in a circle during a Vermont Truth and Reconciliation Commission event in Montpelier on Friday, October 11. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

As Vermont’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission — the panel tasked with studying the historic impacts of racism, discrimination and eugenics on state laws — enters a new phase of its work, it’s facing criticism from Abenaki leaders over who is being included in that work.

Last week, the commission held an event on the steps of the Statehouse in Montpelier to mark the release of its strategic plan. It was the panel’s first major public event. The document outlines the scope of the commission members’ work and lays out a timeline, culminating in a final report expected sometime in mid-2027.

The event opened with a drum circle featuring youth from the Abenaki Circle of Courage, an afterschool program associated with the Abenaki Nation at Missisquoi, one of four groups that has been recognized as Native American by the state of Vermont, though not by the federal government. Brenda Gagne, chief of the Missisquoi group and the leader of the Circle of Courage program, also spoke. 

“We’re happy to be here today,” Gagne said, but “not happy of why it brings us here, and what’s happened in the history of Vermont to our people and people of color.”

Advertisement

The launch also featured about a dozen other speakers, many of whom represented other communities that the commission expects to be part of its work and who said they were excited the commission could soon start gathering testimony from the public.  

“We exist in pursuit of community-centered justice and holistic healing that prioritize impacted Act 128 communities,” the report’s mission statement reads, referring to the demographic groups outlined in the 2022 state law that stood up the commission.

Those include people “who identify as Native American or Indigenous,” people with “physical, psychiatric or mental conditions or disabilities,” those who are Black or “other individuals of color,” people with “French Canadian, French-Indian or other mixed ethnic or racial heritage,” or any other communities that the commissioners see fit to include, the law states. 

Beverly Little Thunder of Huntington speaks during a Vermont Truth and Reconciliation Commission event in Montpelier on Friday, October 11. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

But the panel’s focus on people who “identify” as Indigenous has drawn criticism from Abenaki leaders who have federal-level recognition in Canada and have continuous historic ties to territory that today includes Vermont and other parts of New England. Specifically, they said that directive has already led the commission to tie at least part of its work to groups that they assert cannot claim legitimate Indigenous ancestry. 

In Vermont’s case, the leaders said, those are the four groups that the state recognized as Native American in 2011 and 2012: the Elnu Abenaki, Nulhegan Abenaki, Koasek Band of the Koas Abenaki Nation and the Abenaki Nation at Missisquoi. 

Advertisement

“Vermont’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (VTRC) practices neither truth nor reconciliation when it works with these pretend Indians,” said leaders of Odanak and W8linak First Nations, which today are based in Quebec, in a public statement issued ahead of last week’s Statehouse event. By supporting the commission’s work, they said, “Vermonters with the best intentions are supporting theft and cultural appropriation, and furthering colonization.”

‘Tethered to myths’

Rick O’Bomsawin, the chief of Odanak First Nation, has repeatedly called for Vermont officials to allow him, and other Abenaki leaders based in Quebec, to have a greater role in the truth and reconciliation process. In an interview Wednesday, O’Bomsawin said that the commission has almost entirely continued to ignore those calls.

“We have not been invited to the table. We haven’t had a voice in this,” O’Bomsawin said. “It’s not right.” 

Commissioner Mia Schultz of the Vermont Truth and Reconciliation Commission speaks in Montpelier on Friday, October 11. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

The First Nation has maintained for years that many members of Vermont’s four state-recognized tribes are not Indigenous and, instead, are appropriating Abenaki identity in ways that harm Odanak and W8linak’s band members. Research from scholars on Indigenous communities in New England and Canada — as well as reports from the Vermont and U.S. governments — have concluded that there is little evidence to support the existence of Abenaki tribes in Vermont with ties to historic Abenaki groups. 

At the same time, Odanak and W8linak leaders, a Vermont Attorney General’s Office report and additional, newly-published scholarly research have concluded there is no evidence that Abenaki people were targeted for sterilization as part of Vermont’s state-sanctioned eugenics program in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The program did target poor and disabled people, many of them women, according to the recent research, published in The UVM History Review.

Advertisement

That’s contrary to claims by leaders of Vermont’s four state-recognized groups, who say that many of their members’ families hid their Indigenous identities during the 20th century in an effort to protect themselves from being targeted by that program.

‘A false narrative’: Abenaki leaders dispute the legitimacy of Vermont’s state-recognized tribes


Advertisement

It’s also contrary to the official apology state lawmakers issued three years ago that preceded the creation of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. The apology stated that the eugenics movement — which resulted in about 250 people being sterilized in Vermont — also targeted people whose descendants “now identify as Abenaki.” 

That contradiction means that the commission’s work is fundamentally flawed, according to David Massell, a Canadian Studies professor at the University of Vermont who has helped organize multiple panels at UVM in recent years on the topic of Indigenous identity.  

“In Vermont, in other words, we have a Truth and Reconciliation Commission founded and funded by a Legislature that has been reliant on, and tethered to, myths, rather than evidence-based history,” Massell wrote in an email. 

Massell said he also takes issue with the list of demographic groups that the commission plans to work with, following lawmakers’ direction.

Advertisement
The Abenaki Circle of Courage, comprised of Franklin County middle and high school students, beat a drum while singing in a circle during a Vermont Truth and Reconciliation Commission event in Montpelier on Friday, October 11. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

“It seems it is to be good enough for the Commission, as it was for the Legislature, that persons ‘identify’ as Indigenous. They need not be Indigenous People themselves,” Massell said. “No wonder that the actual Abenaki People, of Odanak and Wolinak First Nations, are incensed at this process and their exclusion from it.” 

An ‘open door’

The newly-released strategic plan also underscores the commission’s task, as described by lawmakers two years ago, to suggest ways the government could redress the impacts of the eugenics movement. The state’s participation in eugenics was codified in 1931 with a law called an “Act for Human Betterment by Voluntary Sterilization.”

“Reparative measures are not just about acknowledging the harm. They are about fixing what is broken,” said Mia Schultz, one of the panel’s commissioners, at last week’s event. “We need to dismantle the barriers that prevent people of color, individuals with disabilities and others, from accessing the opportunities that they deserve.”

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s other commissioner, Melody Mackin, is a member of the Elnu group, which has its headquarters in Brattleboro. In their statement, Odanak and W8linak leaders describe a “pretender” sitting on the commission.

Commissioner Melody Mackin of the Vermont Truth and Reconciliation Commission speaks in Montpelier on Friday, October 11. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Asked about the First Nation’s comments, Mackin wrote in an email that her job “is to listen to the truths” of anyone who is part of the communities that lawmakers identified in their establishing legislation. She said that she spoke with one of Odanak First Nation’s leaders earlier this year and invited members of Odanak’s community to share their perspectives with the Vermont panel, including “how state of Vermont policies have impacted them.” 

Advertisement

“The door is always open,” Mackin said. Both she and Schultz were among the several dozen people who gathered at the Statehouse last Friday for the event marking the strategic plan’s release.

The plan describes Vermont as a historic homeland for Abenaki people, without elaborating. One speaker at last week’s event, though, made reference to the contentious recent debate over Abenaki identity in the state: Beverly Little Thunder, an enrolled member of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe from North Dakota.

Little Thunder now lives in Vermont, and served on the state’s Commission on Native American Affairs before resigning her seat last year and accusing its members in a later interview of being “a whole room full of white men pretending to be Native.” 

Beverly Little Thunder of Huntington speaks during a Vermont Truth and Reconciliation Commission event in Montpelier on Friday, October 11. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

At last week’s event, Little Thunder questioned why there was not anyone present from Odanak and W8linak First Nations — and suggested that the commission’s work was not as inclusive as it professed to be.

“Those citizens there should be here,” she told the crowd. “We’re talking about reconciliation. They should be here talking about the harm that has been done to their communities.”

Advertisement

The commission’s plan divides its work into four phases, two of which have largely been completed and included hiring commissioners and support staff as well as conducting background research. The third phase includes taking public testimony on ways that people have been harmed by discriminatory state policies — potentially, the plan states, in the form of “verbal statements, videos, and written and artistic expression.”

Mackin said she expects to start collecting testimony around the start of 2025.

The commission expects that process to take about another year, after which it will enter the final phase, which is creating a report on its work. The report is expected to include, among other conclusions, “recommendations of new laws or revisions to current laws and policies” for state lawmakers to consider,” the strategic plan states.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

A Vermont bill meant to help music fans could do the opposite – VTDigger

Published

on

A Vermont bill meant to help music fans could do the opposite – VTDigger


This commentary is by David Balto, an antitrust commentator and a former assistant director for policy and evaluation in the Bureau of Competition at the Federal Trade Commission and trial attorney in the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice.

Supporting small businesses over big companies is in Vermonters’ DNA. The Green Mountain State was the first state to ban roadside billboards, and our tax code is written to support mom-and-pop shops over large corporations. Montpelier is the only state capital without a McDonald’s or a Starbucks. So why, days after a federal jury sided with Vermont Attorney General Charity Clark and more than 30 other states, ruling that Ticketmaster and its parent company Live Nation were operating an illegal monopoly, is the state Legislature advancing a policy that will help this corporation invade our state while undercutting our attorney general’s antitrust suit?

Live Nation, which owns and operates some of the largest music venues across the country, and Ticketmaster, which controls roughly 80% of the country’s initial ticket sales, merged in 2010. Since then, ticket prices are up 120%. 

Since the merger, Live Nation-Ticketmaster has used tactics like the “velvet hammer” — withholding concerts from venues they do not control or work with — to consolidate power. Then they force fans to pay sky-high fees, from marking up parking passes to forcing venues to only sell water from a brand Live Nation owns. In internal messages, employees even bragged about how they “gouge” fans and joked they were “robbing them blind.” 

It’s no surprise that, after a decade and a half of antitrust violations, the Live Nation-Ticketmaster monopoly made $25 billion last year. 

Advertisement

Now, the company, which doesn’t own any venues in Vermont, appears poised to establish a foothold in the Green Mountain State with the help of a well-intentioned but poorly executed bill working its way through Montpelier.

Lawmakers are considering legislation that would cap the price of event tickets being resold at no more than 10% above face value. The measure was recently approved by the House and is currently moving through the Senate. 

On its face, the idea sounds appealing: Cracking down on excessive markups should be a win for fans. But the fact that Live Nation-Ticketmaster, which was just found to be operating an illegal monopoly that harmed fans, venues and artists, has supported price caps like those proposed in H.512 in Washington, D.C., California, New York, Minnesota and Ontario should give Vermonters pause.

This billion-dollar corporation doesn’t support ticket resale price caps because it’s good for fans. The company advocates for this policy because the caps don’t apply to “primary” ticket sales: the original point of sale, of which Ticketmaster controls 80%. Instead, the price caps would only apply to resale marketplaces — hitting the only companies that compete with the Live Nation-Ticketmaster monopoly.

Less competition means more power and higher profits for Live Nation-Ticketmaster.

Advertisement

In most states, price caps would consolidate Live Nation-Ticketmaster’s control and allow it to raise ticket prices even further. In Vermont, H.512 may be the final ingredient it needs to enter the state, and, to quote its executives, “boil the frog” — using monopoly power to slowly squeeze out our independent music venues.

With this legislation moving through the Statehouse, Live Nation-Ticketmaster is already establishing a foothold in the Green Mountain State. Earlier this month, it announced a partnership with CashorTrade, a Vermont-based ticketing platform.  

But Live Nation-Ticketmaster doesn’t even need to operate in our state to benefit if Vermont passes this law. If Vermont, which prides itself on pushing back against corporate power, enacts resale price caps, we hand Live Nation-Ticketmaster a powerful talking point to advance its power grab in additional states. We become a critical data point; an example of what “good policy” looks like.

H.512 includes some real, positive policies that help venues and consumers, but the price cap provision that came along for the ride squarely benefits Live Nation-Ticketmaster. Vermont can, and should, have the former without the latter.

Vermont needs to stand up to this corporate bully. If any state knows how to, it’s this one.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

VT Lottery Gimme 5, Pick 3 results for April 30, 2026

Published

on


Powerball, Mega Millions jackpots: What to know in case you win

Here’s what to know in case you win the Powerball or Mega Millions jackpot.

Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

The Vermont Lottery offers several draw games for those willing to make a bet to win big.

Advertisement

Those who want to play can enter the MegaBucks and Lucky for Life games as well as the national Powerball and Mega Millions games. Vermont also partners with New Hampshire and Maine for the Tri-State Lottery, which includes the Mega Bucks, Gimme 5 as well as the Pick 3 and Pick 4.

Drawings are held at regular days and times, check the end of this story to see the schedule.

Here’s a look at April 30, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Gimme 5 numbers from April 30 drawing

02-12-22-25-31

Check Gimme 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Pick 3 numbers from April 30 drawing

Day: 5-0-0

Evening: 5-9-9

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from April 30 drawing

Day: 9-1-6-3

Evening: 5-1-7-1

Advertisement

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from April 30 drawing

05-19-21-42-55, Bonus: 03

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

For Vermont Lottery prizes up to $499, winners can claim their prize at any authorized Vermont Lottery retailer or at the Vermont Lottery Headquarters by presenting the signed winning ticket for validation. Prizes between $500 and $5,000 can be claimed at any M&T Bank location in Vermont during the Vermont Lottery Office’s business hours, which are 8a.m.-4p.m. Monday through Friday, except state holidays.

Advertisement

For prizes over $5,000, claims must be made in person at the Vermont Lottery headquarters. In addition to signing your ticket, you will need to bring a government-issued photo ID, and a completed claim form.

All prize claims must be submitted within one year of the drawing date. For more information on prize claims or to download a Vermont Lottery Claim Form, visit the Vermont Lottery’s FAQ page or contact their customer service line at (802) 479-5686.

Vermont Lottery Headquarters

1311 US Route 302, Suite 100

Barre, VT

Advertisement

05641

When are the Vermont Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 10:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 11 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Gimme 5: 6:55 p.m. Monday through Friday.
  • Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Megabucks: 7:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 11:15 p.m. daily

What is Vermont Lottery Second Chance?

Vermont’s 2nd Chance lottery lets players enter eligible non-winning instant scratch tickets into a drawing to win cash and/or other prizes. Players must register through the state’s official Lottery website or app. The drawings are held quarterly or are part of an additional promotion, and are done at Pollard Banknote Limited in Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Vermont editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Commentary | Notes from a Vermont Activist by Nancy Braus: Why the sudden push for teen pregnancies?

Published

on

Commentary | Notes from a Vermont Activist by Nancy Braus: Why the sudden push for teen pregnancies?


With all the talk of right wing men having a hard time finding a partner, I really was surprised to discover that Stephen Miller, the inspiration for many of Trump’s cruelest immigration policies, had a wife. But, I then was unsurprised that his wife, Katie Miller, has an anti-feminist podcast. Also no surprise: she has been lamenting that the US fertility rate is falling rapidly. But here is the true shocker: who can we blame for that rotten news?

“Since 2007, the teen birth rate has fallen 72%. Hormonal birth control isn’t just poison for women’s minds and bodies — it’s killing population growth. For the first time ever, birth rates for women in their late 30s have surpassed those in their early 20s.”

And to add to the horror of it all, according to Marc Siegel, a talking head on Faux News masquerading as a senior medical analyst, the following actually qualifies as a social problem, and we should be very worried: ”We’re telling people that are young not to have babies, to wait ‘til they’re in a more stable life situation, ‘til they’re more financially secure, maybe they haven’t found the right partner.”

Advertisement

Yes, the very idea of waiting until you have met someone you can see raising a child with, maybe you even deeply love, have enough financial resources to live independently of your hard working parents or parent, and even a high school diploma, is too much for the MAGA crowd in the face of a worse crime: a declining fertility rate.

I guess I missed something: have not the good Christians of the past been horrified by teen sexual activity? In the very recent past, within even the memory of the youngest voters, did teens who engaged in wanton sexual activity not face punishment? Did I imagine the many demands for “abstinence only” sex “education”?

Maybe the push to accept and welcome children having babies is something else altogether: more “Handmaid’s Tale,” and less allowing the kids to relax about sex.

I have to wonder if part, or even all, of this hand wringing is directly related to the rape culture ushered in by electing a president whose followers thought it was cool that he had bragged about grabbing a woman by the “pussy,” and was convicted of molesting a woman in a department store dressing room. Secretary of War Crimes, Pete Hegseth, is mad full of the teachings of a raving lunatic, Doug Wilson, pastor of possibly the most misogynist sect in a country full of weird allegedly Christian teachings, the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches.

At the schools associated with this cult, Amanda Marcotte writes: “Students at ACCS schools who said they were sexually abused by teachers reported being blamed for causing the older men to ‘stumble.’”

Advertisement

And of course, the cherry on the pie for the pro-natalist crowd, Planned Parenthood is the devil and always being deprived of funds that could help women and families actually have some agency in choosing when and if to have kids. And abortion is the worst sin! Senator Josh Hawley is currently attempting to make safe abortions illegal by pressuring a corrupt FDA to declare that mifepristone is unsafe for use —with Republican Senate enthusiasm.

So this push for teen pregnancies may actually not be condoning sex between consenting teens as much as acknowledging the number of young girls who are victims of men who are family members, employers, teachers, politicians, and all the men who see Donald Trump and his ilk as role models. The drip, drip, drip of information about the Dear Leader and rape of a 13-year-old girl continues. Trump acolyte Matt Gaetz has been very credibly accused of child trafficking and statutory rape. While he resigned from Congress, he continues to hold his Florida law license.

This is a dangerous moment for girls — we who grew up with the feminist movement understand and lived what we hope we left behind. Rape was taken as a joke until women forced the issue. I do not need to remind anyone of the many challenges of teen pregnancy. I raised three children — as a full grown adult. I can’t even imagine having taken on the day after day parenting struggles as a 17-year-old, much less at age 14. While the trumpers are doing their best to create a dystopian society, we cannot forget what we, and the suffragettes before us, have achieved in the struggle for women’s rights. No ambiguity 3 — our rights are being challenged by men who believe that the worst elements of the past must be the future. Well, we say no!

Nancy Braus is a long-time political activist who writes from Guilford. The opinions expressed by columnists do not necessarily reflect the views of Vermont News & Media.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending