Three thoughts after San Diego State’s 27-24 win over Hawaii on Saturday night at Snapdragon Stadium.
1. Flipping the script
The Aztecs dropped to 1-4 this season on the coin toss.
SDSU coach Sean Lewis has worked in practice this season to, among other things, increase the offense and decrease the penalties.
How do you improve your record on the coin toss?
Advertisement
Unsolicited advice: Call heads.
Scientific American reported this year on exhaustive research conducted at the University of Amsterdam in which a coin was flipped 350,757 times.
Citing “same-side bias,” it came up heads 51 percent of the time. Hey, wherever you can get an edge.
That being said, it was more important that SDSU avoided seeing its record drop to 1-4 for the first time since 2008, when the Aztecs lost 10 of their first 11 games on the way to a 2-10 finish.
That season, the last under the wrong Long, included a seven-game losing streak. SDSU avoided the possibility of a similar toboggan run by ending a three-game losing streak with the victory over the Rainbow Warriors.
Advertisement
Most important, the Aztecs learned how to win with the game hanging in the balance.
“We’ve talked all along about how important the work is and that work works,” Lewis said. “We need to be committed to our process and our conviction with how we’re going to do it and that the character of the club and the attitude we bring would show up tonight.
“Tonight is a byproduct of the way that our guys have pulled together through all the adversity, putting the blinders on, leaning and relying on one another.”
After a last-minute, one-point loss at Central Michigan in which SDSU led for most of the game, what would losing in similar fashion have done to the Aztecs’ collective psyche?
SDSU had a 20-10 lead midway through the third quarter against Hawaii, then watched the Rainbows put together 12- and 14-play touchdown drives for a 24-20 advantage with less than 10 minutes to play.
Advertisement
The Aztecs responded with their second-longest touchdown drive of the season, an eight-play, 87-yard march. It was keyed by quarterback Danny O’Neil’s 48-yard pass to wide receiver Nate Bennett and capped by running back Marquez Cooper’s game-winning 2-yard touchdown run.
Said Lewis: “We were able to get critical stops, we were able to get scores when needed and special teams did a great job of flipping the field and getting points all on their own. … To get that shot of life and for these guys to be able to celebrate and do things the right way, that’s big.”
2. ‘Valuing’ the football
A concern with O’Neil during spring football and training camp was being a little fast and loose with the football. SDSU defenders let him know in practice and scrimmages, picking off several passes.
It wasn’t recklessness, necessarily, but perhaps trying to do things O’Neil could get away with in high school that won’t fly in college.
Apparently, O’Neil got the ill-advised throws out of his system. His college career has started with 113 straight passes without an interception.
Advertisement
O’Neil is barely halfway to the 209 in a row Robert Griffin III threw without a pick when he was a freshman at Baylor, but his start is notable nonetheless.
O’Neil completed his first 10 passes against Hawaii, finishing 24-for-33 for 224 yards and a touchdown. Obviously, he listened to Lewis’ pregame instructions.
“I told him before we went out there that we’re wearing black tonight, so throw it to the guys in the black shirt,” said Lewis, before getting serious. “He does a great job knowing and understanding what is open at this level.
“I think that’s something that young quarterbacks have to learn and they have to feel on their own. He’s done a very good job of that with his film study and the actual application of what he’s been able to do.”
Lewis said going against SDSU’s defense, especially an experienced secondary, quickly helped O’Neil learn “this is open, that ain’t open.”
Advertisement
“We get to compete against that on a daily basis,” Lewis said. “When you go against another opponent … you have a good feel for where you can fit a football and where you can’t.”
It has to be tempting at times to air it out, but O’Neil hasn’t allowed himself to get carried away.
“Being able to protect the ball on Saturdays is my main job,” O’Neil said. “Just being able to put the ball in playmakers’ hands, distribute the ball and not have any turnovers, that’s my goal every week.”
3. Trey sacks
SDSU edge Trey White had three sacks two games ago at Central Michigan. It wasn’t enough to prevent a frustrating, painful loss.
So White went out and repeated the feat against Hawaii.
Advertisement
“I just wanted to come up big for our team,” said White, a sophomore from Eastlake High School. “We didn’t want to have that feeling of a loss again. I hate that feeling, and I know our whole team does.
“The look on our faces after that Central Michigan game was terrible, and I never want that to happen again.”
White has nine sacks on the season, giving him a share of the national lead with Boston College’s Donovan Ezeiruaku. White’s 1.8 sacks/game would be a national record if maintained throughout the season. Terrell Suggs averaged 1.7 sacks a game (24 for the season) in 2002 at Arizona State.
Lewis credits White for bringing the “same relentless approach that he has every single day.”
“We’ve been talking about him and buzzing about him ever since we got here,” said Lewis, who repositioned White from linebacker to edge this season. “It’s a testament to the belief our staff had in him to bring him closer to the ball. With his skill set, with his ability, we knew that he was going to be a great fit in what we were building.
Advertisement
“He’s the standard for what it looks like in terms of the approach and the discipline and the character and the conviction that’s required to show up and produce on a weekly basis the way that he does.”
Support CleanTechnica’s work through a Substack subscription or on Stripe.
University of Hawaii at Manoa and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Teamed up To Analyze Feasibility of Geothermal Cooling Technologies
By Justin Daugherty, NLR
In areas with geologically recent volcanic activity and ample underground water flow, like the Hawaiian Islands, geothermal energy technologies present options to augment the electric grid.
Advertisement
Oahu’s steep terrain and highly permeable volcanic rock enable large groundwater flow, a must for successful ground heat exchangers in Hawaii, where load is cooling dominated. Shown here is Kaena Point, the western tip of Oahu’s North Shore. Photo from Christine Doughty, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
To investigate building cooling and energy efficiency options, the University of Hawaii at Manoa’s Hawaii Groundwater and Geothermal Resources Center collaborated with scientists at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory through the U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Technology Innovation Partnership Project (ETIPP).
Managed by the National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR), formerly known as NREL, ETIPP supports remote, coastal, and island communities with technical assistance and energy planning to help them build more reliable and affordable energy systems. Communities apply for up to 24 months of technical assistance, and those communities drive the scopes and focuses of their energy projects.
University of Hawaii at Manoa joined the program in 2022 with a desire to explore geothermal options, and a new report from this project details the feasibility of developing shallow ground heat exchangers (GHEs) across Oahu and at a specific site on the island for cooling.
Geothermal heat pumps take advantage of relatively constant temperatures just under the earth’s surface, using GHEs to exchange heat with the earth. Through a system of looping pipes in the shallow ground, GHEs can move heat from a warm place to a cooler place, like how a refrigerator functions.
“High-temperature geothermal, which requires deep drilling, is required to produce electricity, but low-temperature geothermal such as GHEs, which can be accessed much nearer the ground surface, can be used for building heating and cooling, greatly lessening loads on the electric grid,” said Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s Christine Doughty, staff scientist.
Advertisement
“I believe both types of geothermal have potential to be an asset to Hawaii,” added Nicole Lautze, founder and director of the Hawaii Groundwater and Geothermal Resources Center.
Determining Geothermal Cooling Favorability in Hawaii
In open-loop geothermal systems, wells are drilled to extract and inject groundwater, allowing the movement of thermal heat to and from the earth. These GHEs use cooler ground water from outside the system for the cooling process and expel the warmer water afterward.
In contrast, closed-loop GHE systems continually circulate a heat-transfer solution through pipes, which transfers heat to and from the ground via thermal conduction. Groundwater needs to have temperatures that are low enough to effectively cool buildings, and groundwater flow in a GHE system works to remove built-up heat.
Hawaii has far greater needs for cooling than for heating—meaning that GHEs would add heat to the subsurface and cause the systems to not function as desired. That is where groundwater comes in: It replaces heated water from the boreholes and maintains the functionality of the GHE system. Sufficient groundwater flow, then, is essential to the considerations for GHE deployment. GHE systems may not be deployed in areas with restricted watersheds or where there is subsurface production of freshwater. Therefore, closed-loop systems may be a more reasonable option in some locations.
Left: A geographic information system map of Oahu depicts different soil permeability zones (“Ksat_Class” indicates the potential speed of groundwater flow). Right: Locations of U.S. Department of Defense lands and public and private schools—potential customers for GHE—are shown.
Numerous factors help determine whether a community or business may consider GHEs. Areas with older homes may lack efficient energy systems, and some organizations, like schools or government buildings, may prioritize more adaptive heating and cooling. Cultural considerations are also very important, and a new NLR report incorporates Hawaii communities’ perspectives on geothermal.
Economic factors are another big consideration, with the expense of deploying a system versus energy savings playing into overall cost. Modeling revealed that electricity and energy transfer demand decreased, and such reductions contributed to cost savings. Longer loan terms may help ease deployment expenses for geothermal systems.
Advertisement
ETIPP researchers factored the above parameters into their analysis to develop favorability maps for closed-loop and open-loop GHE systems. They used specific geographic information system layers with 11 attributes—including elevation, geology, and soil permeability—to develop an overall favorability map for GHEs on Oahu.
For the site-specific feasibility analysis at the University of Hawaii at Manoa’s Stan Sheriff Center, researchers used a hydrogeologic model to analyze groundwater flow of a closed-loop system at the site. Restrictions on water quality—mandating that groundwater must be left in its natural state—diminished the available area for GHE system deployment across the island, while many coastal areas showed high favorability. Overlays showing potential customers and restricted areas sharpened the maps.
This closed-loop favorability map shows restricted areas where GHE development is not possible. Pixels colored dark green—the top of the color spectrum table—indicate land that is more favorable to geothermal energy.
Geothermal Cooling Potential at University of Hawaii at Manoa
From the island-wide analysis, ETIPP analysis homed in and found that the Stan Sheriff Center at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, a building with a high cooling load in an area with lots of open space surrounding it, could make a good candidate for site-specific analysis of GHE technology.
Researchers used a hydrogeologic model to analyze a potential closed-loop system at the site. They modeled groundwater and heat flow, analyzed subsurface heat flow, and completed a techno-economic analysis.
Analysis without groundwater flow showed that the GHE system may operate normally in the first year, but heat buildup would increase water temperatures significantly after that, and without groundwater to sweep heat away, there would be increased chiller demand in years two through six. Modeling that incorporated groundwater flow—with similar conditions as the Stan Sheriff Center—showed that heat would be effectively swept away from the borefield, which would enable successful GHE operation for at least 10 years. Thus, including groundwater in analysis and planning—coupled with low interest loan rates and high capital investment—may provide economic benefits to the university.
The Stan Sheriff Center (white dome in the center of the image) is located at the base of the Koolau Range. Image from Google Earth.
Cold seawater may be an option for cooling-source systems, the analysis concluded, and such a system already operates at the Natural Energy Laboratory of Hawaii. The report authors encouraged further study.
As in Hawaii, ETIPP continues to help communities explore geothermal and other technologies to help meet their energy needs through in-depth, collaborative investigation of potential solutions.
Advertisement
“This ETIPP project established a strong collaboration with LBNL and the foundation for what I hope is additional grant funding to explore the potential of GHEs on the UHM campus and across the state to cool buildings and reduce load on Hawaii’s grid,” Lautze said.
The U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Technology Innovation Partnership Project (ETIPP) is a community-led technical support program for coastal, remote, and island communities to access unique solutions and increase energy reliability. By uniting federal agencies, national laboratories, regional organizations, and community stakeholders, ETIPP provides tailored technical support to help communities achieve affordable, reliable solutions to their energy system challenges. This collaborative model leverages the combined expertise and resources of its partners to deliver comprehensive, practical solutions that align with local needs. Learn more about ETIPP.
Sign up for CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and high level summaries, sign up for our daily newsletter, and follow us on Google News!
Advertisement
Advertisement
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Sign up for our daily newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or sign up for our weekly one on top stories of the week if daily is too frequent.
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.
Comet C/2025 A6, better known as Comet Lemmon, was one of the latest icy visitors to swing through our neighborhood of the solar system, leaving astronomers and casual skywatchers equally delighted. For observers in Hawaii, the glow of the Milky Way didn’t dim the streak of light made by this comet passing through.
What is it?
Comet Lemmon was discovered in January 2025 and made its closest approach to Earth in late October 2025. But by November 2025, when this image was taken, it had brightened to about the same apparent brightness as the planet Uranus, making it visible to the naked eye even from suburban skies.
Where is it?
This image was taken atop the volcanic peak Mauna Kea, on the Big Island of Hawaii.
Comet Lemmon could be seen with the naked eye as it streaked across the sky. (Image credit: International Gemini Observatory/NOIRLab/NSF/AURAImage processing: M. Rodriguez (International Gemini Observatory/NSF NOIRLab) & M. Zamani (NSF NOIRLab))
Why is it amazing?
Comets are notoriously unpredictable, so Comet Lemmon’s surprising visibility has felt like a bit of a cosmic bonus for Hawaiian stargazers. And this was a rare treat, as the comet won’t return to Earth’s skies for another 1,350 years, around the year 3375.
Framing this comet is the glow of our home galaxy, the Milky Way, which is easier to spot at higher elevations like Mauna Kea’s peak, where there is less light pollution. The image gives us a souvenir from a celestial visitor that won’t be back for more than a millennium.
Want to learn more?
You can learn more about comets and skywatching.
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
WASHINGTON, D.C. (HawaiiNewsNow) – U.S. Senators Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) and Tammy Duckworth (D-Illinois) reintroduced a piece of legislation on Thursday to strengthen protections for immigrant families and address long-standing problems in the family immigration system.
The Reuniting Families Act aims to reduce visa backlogs, boost efficiency across the immigration process, and ensure a fairer, more humane process for immigrant families.
“Immigrant families currently experience unnecessary obstacles and delays due to our country’s broken immigration system, keeping families separated for potentially long periods of time,” Hirono said. “By reducing family-based immigration backlogs and making common sense updates to how we treat families, the Reuniting Families Act will help take the first step in the right direction to keeping families together as they navigate our immigration system.”
According to the senators behind this bill, nearly four million people with approved visa applications are currently trapped in a massive immigration backlog, with many waiting more than a decade to reunite with their loved ones.
Advertisement
“As Donald Trump’s inhumane mass deportation campaign rips apart families and communities across the country, it’s paramount we address the unnecessary barriers in our immigration system that have created backlogs and kept families apart for years,” Duckworth said. “Our legislation would implement commonsense reforms to help end family-based backlogs, which keep too many with approved green card applications stuck in bureaucratic limbo, and help get more families where they belong—together.”
The Reuniting Families Act would shorten delays by recapturing unused visas, rolling them into future years, expanding who qualifies as a family member to include permanent partners, and increasing both the total number of available family preference visas and per-country limits.
The bill would also put a time limit on visa processing, so no applicant has to wait more than 10 years for a visa if they have an approved application.
Click here to read the full bill.
Copyright 2025 Hawaii News Now. All rights reserved.