Entertainment
With 'La Máquina,' Diego Luna is embracing the passage of time
Diego Luna is thinking about time a lot lately. How it’s passing. And how it’s spent.
His latest project, “La Máquina,” which premieres Oct. 9 on Hulu and is the streamer’s first Spanish-language series, was first dreamed up by Luna and his longtime friend and collaborator, Gael García Bernal, as a feature film project more than a decade ago. But as the years wore on, the chance to turn this boxing story into a thrilling episodic series felt both obvious and exciting.
“I’m glad it took us time,” Luna tells The Times on a sunny afternoon in September at the Chateau Marmont. “Because I think the opportunity to talk about the career of a boxer and the relationship between him and his manager at the end of his career is really strong. It serves, in many ways, to reflect and establish parallels between that and what we go through as actors. In our careers. In our journey in this business.”
Esteban (García Bernal) knows his days as a professional boxer — as “La Máquina” — are numbered. He can’t continue chasing the glory of years past. His body can’t keep up. Neither can his mind.
For his manager, Andy (Luna), that’s clearly a problem. And so, after Esteban loses a key fight against a famed newcomer, Andy insists on launching a comeback. The decision proves dangerous as both men end up at the mercy of unseen forces intent on getting payment for a debt incurred years before that helped make “La Máquina” into the celebrated and lucrative fighter he is. Or was.
Hulu’s “La Máquina” follows Esteban (Gael García Bernal), an aging boxer whose mind is slipping, and his manager Andy (Diego Luna).
(Hulu)
Written by Marco Ramirez, who serves as showrunner, and directed by Gabriel Ripstein, the series lays out a world of sporting corruption in Mexico. But at its heart “La Máquina” is a show about learning how to let go, about how to stop fighting the passing of time and embrace instead the changes you can still make in your life.
“I’m capable of doing this because now I can talk about aging,” Luna explains. “Because I’m there. I have kids. My son is 16. My daughter is 14. When I look at them, I realize it’s been a while since I’ve been here. When I talk about my career, I’m talking about stuff I did more than 25 years ago. It’s a long time.”
Gazing backward, while focused on the possibilities of a future at hand, fuels Luna. The “Y Tu Mamá También” and “Andor” actor has long understood his role as an artist to be rooted in conscientiously mirroring the world around him and the many colorful characters that inhabit it.
Andy is a man as tragic as he is absurd. He’s an insecure mama’s boy who desperately works to make himself into the type of guy who’ll be wanted and respected.
“I think this character is gonna make you laugh till you go, ‘Oh, wait a second. What’s going on here?’” Luna says.
That’s nowhere clearer than in the first episode where we witness Andy’s early-morning routine: We watch him put on his hair piece and apply spray tan. We watch him psych himself up in front of the mirror and even do his own lip injections — all while rocking out to Christian Castro’s “No podrás.”
The montage is one of Luna’s favorite moments on the show, “because we’re establishing that there was a moment where he was there, but then he hid behind this mask. This is his process. I think it serves as a great metaphor of how wrong it is to try to let that machinery of popularity define your success. Today we make a business of our privacy. And this guy is performing 24/7.”
Diego Luna says one of his favorite scenes in the series is in Episode 1, when we see Andy putting on his hair piece and applying spray tan.
(Alexandro Bolanos Escamilla / Hulu)
Luna is nearly unrecognizable in the part. For an actor who has long leveraged his baby-faced looks to play everything from lustful teenagers and rabble rousers to narcos and soccer players, his portrayal of Andy marks a departure for the actor.
“If we were gonna have the opportunity to be in control of the next project we were doing together, I was gonna ask myself to do something very different,” he says about conceiving the project with García Bernal. “I was going to take a risk. I wanted to put myself in a very uncomfortable situation.”
Only he couldn’t have anticipated just how uncomfortable playing Andy would be.
“Every day was painful,” he says, in between laughter. “It was hours in the chair. These prosthetics don’t let your skin breathe. Basically you’re suffocating yourself and your skin. I couldn’t eat. And because of the lips, I had to use a straw. So I was having shakes all day long.”
What helped was having a close friend as a scene partner. “That the person in front of you actually gets it doesn’t happen often,” Luna says.
Calling from London, García Bernal agrees. “At the beginning when we started working [together], we thought this was something that happened with everybody. And then we realized, no, it’s actually quite unique,” he says.
The two have known each other since they were kids. Their mothers were friends and colleagues who raised both boys in the theater world, which encourages play and make-believe. “It’s very special because we are family first,” Luna adds.
But what they have remains ineffable. “I don’t know what it is, and it’s better maybe not to know, better to maybe surprise ourselves every time,” García Bernal says. “We both understand what we do as an act of freedom. As an act of getting to know oneself, of trying to appeal to some sort of transcendence. And what is nice is to see how that is shaped with another — the same meaning, but with a different poetic than mine.”
Diego Luna says about taking on “La Máquina”: “I was going to take a risk. I wanted to put myself in a very uncomfortable situation.”
(Carlos Gonzalez / For The Times)
“La Máquina” continues Luna’s commitment to producing work that makes audiences sit up and pay attention. A subplot of the series centers on Esteban’s ex-wife, Irasema (Eiza González). She’s a reporter intent on uncovering the truth behind the many rigged matches that have come to dominate the sport, a quest that puts her and her family in harm’s way.
“I’ve always been worried about what happens and what’s going on,” Luna says. “I’ve always tried to find out how to be useful, how to belong to something I could feel proud of.”
Such convictions bear out in the many projects Luna has produced throughout his career and lately, that’s under the banner of his and García Bernal’s production company, La Corriente del Golfo. That includes their most recent project, Santiago Maza’s documentary “State of Silence,” which premiered at Tribeca Film Festival in June. Luna has shepherded the film since 2019, when he was approached to back a project about the dangers journalists in Mexico face in speaking truth to power.
Maza, who worked on the actor’s dinner table docuseries “Pan y Circo,” has found in Luna a principled collaborator. One whose rabid curiosity about the world is inspiring.
“I was impressed back then with how well informed he was,” says Maza over Zoom about their first meeting. “I think now I understand why. I know his habits: all the time he’s reading news or listening to the radio. I recall that when we were talking about politics and things I was like, ‘Man, this guy knows his stuff.’”
“State of Silence” was originally conceived as a series. Luna funded the pilot but found no network that would produce it. By 2022, Maza had reworked the project into a feature-length film funded independently by Corriente del Golfo, with help from the Ford Foundation and Luminate.
Recently acquired by Netflix, the documentary offers a harrowing and urgent portrait of the violence journalists in Mexico have come to expect when reporting on everything from cartel shootings to local corruption. That it arrives the same year as “La Máquina” speaks to the type of work Luna devotes his time to.
“Diego and Gael know about this,” Maza shares. “They’ve done this their entire careers — how to make entertainment that can also nurture us, inform us and that can raise awareness. These are two projects now that, while they may not look too similar, they help paint a portrait of contemporary Mexico.”
If Luna’s career is driven by a tenet, it’s the belief that the stories he tells matter and that the work demands he be invested in what it can say.
“You spend so much time thinking of it, convincing others to do it, then doing it, then promoting it,” Luna says. “So it should matter.”
“I do believe that specific stories can change your perception. I think that is something you remind yourself every time you approach this job: You might be participating in something that will give hope to others and that will make you proud,” he says. “In that search, you can miss many times, obviously. And you will miss many times. But it’s the search that matters.”
Entertainment
Commentary: Drop the bomb or save humanity? ‘Pluribus’ and its misanthrope’s dilemma
This article contains spoilers for the Season 1 finale of Apple TV’s “Pluribus.”
Fellow misanthropes, Season 1 of “Pluribus” is done. Now what do we do, other than lean into our usual harsh judgment and mistrust of others?
Our spirit series left us wondering who or what will put the final nail in humanity’s collective coffin: an alien virus or a malcontent with an atomic bomb. As for saving everyone? Cranky protagonist Carol Sturka (Rhea Seehorn) struggled to find ways to preserve the human race for much of the series, but by the finale, she was fairly convinced that the planet would be better off without us.
For those of you who haven’t kept up with the best show on television this year, Carol’s among 13 people left on Earth who are immune to an alien virus that’s otherwise fused all of humanity’s consciousness together into one blissful hive mind. Now everyone thinks alike and has the same knowledge base, which means TGI Fridays waiters can pilot passenger planes and children can perform surgeries. No one is an individual anymore. They simply occupy the body formerly known as Tom or Sally or whomever. “Us” is their chosen pronoun.
This army of smiling, empty vessels just wants to please Carol — until they can turn her into one of them. Joining them will make her happy, she’s told. It’s a beautiful thing, having your mind wiped. But the terminally dissatisfied Carol would rather stew in her own low-grade depression and angst that forfeit her free will. Plus, her ire and rage is kryptonite against those who’ve been “joined.” When confronted with her anger, they physically seize up and stop functioning. Their paralyzing fear of Carol’s ire is empowering, pathetic and hilarious. The world literally comes to a standstill when she snaps. No wonder she’s my hero.
“Pluribus” comes from Vince Gilligan, the same brilliant mind behind “Breaking Bad” and “Better Call Saul.” The Apple TV series is nothing like his previous successes except that it’s set in Albuquerque, stars Seehorn and is singularly brilliant. And like those other seminal dramas, it plumbs deeper questions about how we see ourselves, who we really are and who we strive to be.
To be fair, Carol was irritated by the human race long before the alien virus converted them into worker bees. She was convinced most people were sheep — including those who loved the flowery writing and cheesy romance plots of her novels. But the the total loss of a free-thinking community isn’t all that satisfying, either.
In the finale, she connects with Manousos Oviedo (Carlos-Manuel Vesga), a fellow survivor who’s also immune to the virus. He wants nothing to do with the afflicted, no matter how peace-loving they appear. In the before times, it appears he was a self-sufficient loner. Postapocalypse, he travels all the way from Paraguay to meet Carol after he receives a video message from her. He drives most of the way before arriving at the treacherous Darién Gap, where he’s sidelined after falling into a thorny tree — but “they” save him, much to his chagrin. He eventually continues the journey, via ambulance.
Now saving the human race is up to two people who never had much love for it in the first place. They converse through a language translation app, which makes their arduous task all the more complicated — and hilarious.
Multiple theories have sprung up around what “Pluribus” is really about. One prevailing thought is that “the joining” is a metaphor for AI creating a world where all individual thought and creativity are synthesized into a single, amenable voice. Surrender your critical thinking for easy answers, or in the case of “Pluribus,” an easy life where you’ll never have to make a decision on your own again. Most humans would rather be a doormat than a battering ram, regardless of the urgency or circumstance.
Optimists might say, “Why pick one extreme or the other? There’s surely a place in the middle, where we can all live in harmony while holding onto our opinions and sense of self.” That’s sweet. Carol and I heartily disagree given the arc of history and all.
Just how my favorite new antihero will deal with her disdain for the Others is yet to be seen. Save the world or destroy it? We’ll all have to wait until next season to find out. Until then, “Pluribus” just needs some space.
Movie Reviews
Movie review: A24’s “Marty Supreme” is a mixed bag of humor and intensity
Josh Safdie’s “Marty Supreme” arrives with all the energy and confidence of an aspiring athlete – even one of the table tennis variety.
The film is packed with vivid period detail and striking cinematography that brings 1950s New York to life. On a purely technical level, the movie succeeds. It’s visually inventive, rhythmically paced and often laugh-out-loud funny.
The plot is also engaging, moving at a fast pace to keep up momentum for over two hours. Safdie builds a world where table tennis is more than a game; instead becoming a stage for obsession, ego and ambition. Even as the story dips further and further into chaos, the narrative stays entertaining and unpredictable enough to keep audiences invested.
But as strong as the filmmaking is, the movie’s impact is limited by its abrasive lead. Timothée Chalamet’s Marty Mauser is undeniably watchable, yet consistently unlikable. His selfishness, impulsive decisions and willingness to steamroll everyone around him creates a major disconnect between Mauser and the audience.
Chalamet’s performance is committed and his intensity drives several of the film’s most engaging scenes. Still, it is difficult to root for a character who rarely shows the vulnerability or growth needed to anchor a story this ambitious. For many viewers (myself included), that emotional detachment will shape the entire experience.
The film’s tone may also catch audiences off guard. For a movie centered on table tennis, “Marty Supreme” is extraordinarily vulgar. Its R rating is well earned, with explicit sexual content, coarse language and several violent scenes that land with surprising force. From consensually dubious spanking scenes to Holocaust jokes, the film more than toes the line between bold and unsettling. The contrast between the lightness of the sport and the heaviness of the film’s content is intentionally jarring, but the shock factor can overshadow the story’s strengths.
Even so, “Marty Supreme” remains a compelling watch. Safdie’s direction is inventive, the pacing is tight and the supporting cast (including Gwenyth Paltrow and Tyler, The Creator) bring welcome depth to the film’s darker impulses.
The result is a movie that is engaging and frequently funny – but also brash and not particularly easy to love.
Whether viewers leave impressed or unsettled will depend on their tolerance for its unlikable hero and its unexpectedly graphic approach. For all its craft and confidence, “Marty Supreme” is the kind of film that invites debate and, for some, a fair amount of discomfort.
If nothing else, it proves that a table tennis movie can surprise you – for better and for worse.
“Marty Supreme” is set for a public release on Dec. 25, with specific times varying by theatre. If you are interested in attending a showing, consider taking advantage of discounted AMC tickets, available for reservation through the Center for Leadership and Engagement here at Simmons.
Entertainment
‘South Park’ creators clash with performers at their Colorado restaurant
“South Park” creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker, who this summer landed one of the richest TV deals ever, are being called Scrooges by performers at their Casa Bonita restaurant near Denver.
In late October, the performers, including the famed cliff divers, went on a three-day strike, citing unsafe working conditions and stalled negotiations over their first contract. The performers voted unanimously to unionize with Actors’ Equity Assn. a year ago.
The strike ended when the restaurant’s management agreed to bring in a mediator to assist in the negotiations.
But the standoff has continued, prompting Actors’ Equity to take out an ad in the Denver Post this week that depicts a “South Park” cartoon-like Parker and Stone awash in hundred-dollar bills while their staff, including a gorilla and a person clad in a swimsuit, shivers outside in the Colorado cold.
The union said its goal is to prod the star producers to resolve the labor tensions by giving about 60 Casa Bonita performers, including magicians and puppeteers, a pay increase and other benefits along with their first contract.
A full page ad is running in the Denver Post on Dec 24.
(Actors’ Equity Association)
Other Casa Bonita workers voted earlier this month to join the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees Local 7.
“At Casa Bonita, we value all of our team members and their well being,” the restaurant management said in a statement. “We are negotiating in good faith with our unionized team members in the hopes of concluding fair collective bargaining agreements.”
Parker and Stone declined to comment through a spokesperson.
The pair, who also created the hit Broadway play “The Book of Mormon,” rescued the kitschy, bright-pink Mexican-themed eatery in Lakewood, Colo., from bankruptcy in 2021 and have since plowed more than $40 million into the restaurant to upgrade and correct unsafe electrical, plumbing and structural issues after the facility had fallen into disrepair.
For “South Park” super-fans, the venue has become something of a mecca since first being featured in the seventh season of the long-running Comedy Central cartoon.
In that episode, Cartman flips out when Kyle invites Stan, Kenny and Butters Stotch to his birthday party at Casa Bonita (not Cartman), where they are serenaded by the restaurant’s ubiquitous mariachi bands.
Along with legions of other kids who grew up in Colorado, Parker and Stone fondly remember making the trek to the Casa Bonita of their 1980s youth. Restoring the restaurant has become a passion project for the writers, a journey that became grist for a documentary, “¡Casa Bonita Mi Amor!,” which streams on Paramount+.
In July, Paramount managers were eager to tie up loose ends to facilitate the company’s sale to David Ellison’s Skydance Media and RedBird Capital Partners. The incoming management team also became involved in the protracted negotiations to strike a new deal with Parker and Stone’s production company, Park County, to avoid having the situation unravel, possibly tripping up their corporate takeover.
Paramount ultimately agreed to extend the overall deal for Park County as well as lock up the show’s exclusive global streaming rights for $300 million a year over five years. Until this year, the show streamed exclusively on HBO Max.
The overall deal is slated to bring Parker and Stone’s firm $1.25 billion through 2030.
As part of the pact, the team agreed to create 50 new “South Park” episodes for Paramount. The series has enjoyed a ratings bounce and increased cultural resonance this year as it routinely roasts President Trump.
Actors’ Equity, which also represents Broadway performers, is seeking pay raises for its members at Casa Bonita. Union representatives said performers’ wages there average $21 to $26 an hour.
“Matt and Trey have become fabulously wealthy by pointing out the hypocrisy of rich and powerful people,” said David Levy, communications director for Actors’ Equity. “And now they are behaving exactly like the people they like to take down.”
-
Iowa1 week agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Maine1 week agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland1 week agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
New Mexico1 week agoFamily clarifies why they believe missing New Mexico man is dead
-
South Dakota1 week agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago‘Love being a pedo’: Metro Detroit doctor, attorney, therapist accused in web of child porn chats
-
Health1 week ago‘Aggressive’ new flu variant sweeps globe as doctors warn of severe symptoms
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMIT professor Nuno F.G. Loureiro, a 47-year-old physicist and fusion scientist, shot and killed in his home in Brookline, Mass. | Fortune