Connect with us

News

2 years and counting. Inmate says medical delays still plague federal prison in Oregon

Published

on

2 years and counting. Inmate says medical delays still plague federal prison in Oregon

Luke Thornhill and his mother, Nancy Richardson, in an undated photo.

Nancy Richardson


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Nancy Richardson

Luke Thornhill is scheduled to be released from an Oregon prison in four years.

He’s terrified he might die before then.

He has family waiting for him in Idaho, “And I’m scared I’m never gonna see them again,” Thornhill said during multiple calls with NPR from prison.

Advertisement

He’s scared because he’s been suffering from serious medical issues — including severe abdominal pains, bloody bowel movements and a swollen abdomen — since at least 2022, when he was incarcerated in a different facility. And he says he has not been able to get the treatment that he needs.

“If you looked at my stomach, it bulges out on the right side, like the size of a grapefruit. And it just hurts all the time,” Thornhill says.

Now, he feels worse than ever, he says. Constant pain makes it difficult even to sleep through the night.

“If I’m not careful with what I eat or drink or careful of how I move then I’m in worse pain and bleeding even worse.”

Thornhill was sentenced to 80 months in federal prison on drug charges in March 2023.

Advertisement

In 2022, while incarcerated in Idaho, he underwent a colonoscopy, during which two polyps were removed.

After Idaho, Thornhill was moved to SeaTac, the federal prison in Seattle, and earlier this year was moved to the federal facility in Sheridan, Ore.

Since he left Idaho, Thornhill says, he hasn’t reviewed the biopsy results with any doctors at either SeaTac or Sheridan — and nothing about his situation has changed.

“We’re talking about something that I’ve been dealing with for a year now. I’ve been literally suffering for the last year. And I’ve been begging them to give me treatment for this,” he says. “Nobody can tell me there isn’t something wrong with me.”

The federal Bureau of Prisons said in response to specific questions about Thornhill’s complaints that “For privacy, safety, and security reasons, we do not discuss any individuals’ conditions of confinement, to include health status or medical treatment plans.”

Advertisement

Problems with prison health care are well documented

Delays or substandard health care for prisoners in the U.S. carceral system are not uncommon. In 2023, NPR published a report showing that nearly 5,000 federal prisoners died over the past decade from treatable conditions after not getting timely diagnoses or treatment while incarcerated.

Lawmakers have begun to put the U.S. federal prison system under more scrutiny. In late July, President Biden signed the Federal Prison Oversight Act into law, which mandates routine inspections of all federal Bureau of Prison’s facilities and the creation of an ombudsman to investigate the welfare and safety of inmates and staff.

The prison at Sheridan, in particular, has been criticized recently for medical delays, and at the end of 2023, investigators with the Justice Department launched an unannounced inspection of the facility.

In May 2024, the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General released a report that concluded staffing issues at Sheridan contributed to more than 100 missed inmate medical appointments between January and November 2023 and a backlog of hundreds of lab tests and pending X-ray orders — leading to medical conditions potentially going undiagnosed.

Advertisement

In response, the federal Bureau of Prisons said it made several changes since the inspection — including hiring more staff and making a substantial dent in the number of missed appointments and the testing backlog.

As of May 2024, the backlog of laboratory orders dropped to 44 from 725 and the backlog of pending X-ray orders was 84, down from 274, according to the inspection report. The BOP reported that 89 of 101 appointments had been completed since the OIG inspection.

But Thornhill and at least two other Sheridan inmates that reached out to NPR say they are still in dire need of medical care. Their repeated requests to see a doctor are not being addressed, they say. Thornhill says Sheridan’s claims that officials addressed the major backlog of lab tests and X-rays is flat-out wrong.

“The BOP is definitely broken,” Thornhill says.

An outside view of the federal prison in Sheridan, Ore., from 2018. In May, the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General issued a report criticizing the prison's backlog of medical requests.

An outside view of the federal prison in Sheridan, Ore., from 2018. In May, the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General issued a report criticizing the prison’s backlog of medical requests.

Andrew Selsky/AP

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Andrew Selsky/AP

Advertisement

During the reporting of this story, NPR reviewed medical records and several requests for medical care that Thornhill sent to prison officials in Idaho and Seattle.

He said that for months he wasn’t able to make copies of documents or access his medical file and requests at Sheridan. Late this month, he reported finally getting copies of those records.

And, he told NPR, that despite submitting numerous requests for medical care at Sheridan, he discovered recently that officials there only have one of his requests for medical help on file.

Regarding Thornhill’s complaints about access to his medical records, the Bureau of Prisons said inmate medical records are “available for review upon request by any incarcerated person” who uses the proper request procedures. The requests should be processed within 30 days, the BOP said.

“All requests and the issuance of records are documented in the individual’s medical record. Currently, FCI Sheridan has no request for medical records older than 10 days, before fulfilment,” the BOP told NPR in a statement.

Advertisement

But Thornhill says that in the past, he has made multiple requests that were not honored.

BOP says it’s made changes

The OIG and the federal Bureau of Prisons have pointed to severe staffing shortages as a significant contributing factor to ongoing problems with the federally run prison system.

The BOP “has been transparent that staffing across the agency remains a challenge, as the FBOP is faced with the same worker shortage experienced by employers throughout the country,” the agency said in a statement to NPR. “The work to address these challenges is ongoing and includes a robust national recruitment strategy with the assistance of an external contract consultant.”

The agency told NPR in July that approximately 70% of positions in Sheridan’s Health Services Department are filled. Correctional services positions, such as guards, are approximately 87% filled.

Advertisement

Competing claims on test backlogs

One of the procedures Thornhill wanted to have done was an X-ray.

After the OIG report, Sheridan said X-ray order backlogs were being addressed. But Thornhill says that isn’t the case.

After the Sheridan report was published, Thornhill says he and about 100 other inmates were called to be taken to receive X-rays. Instead, he alleges that corrections staff repeatedly pressured him and other inmates — even some with broken bones — to sign forms refusing those X-rays.

Thornhill claims that officers at the prison made the experience as uncomfortable as possible — handcuffing each prisoner tightly around the wrists, putting them in cramped rooms and buses, serving them frozen meals without warming them up — to discourage them from wanting to undergo the process again. Thornhill believes the reason was to get the official number of X-ray requests down. He says he never signed the forms, but after a couple of months, still has not received an X-ray.

He says that of the couple dozen men who remained to get X-rays, only six or so were able to get the procedure done before staff said the machine was broken.

Advertisement

In response to these claims, the BOP said, “For privacy, safety, and security reasons, we do not discuss any individuals’ conditions of confinement, but as noted above, policy requires medical treatment which meets community standards and staff misconduct is not tolerated.”

It’s rare for prisoners to see an actual doctor, Thornhill says

Thornhill’s attempts to see a doctor for his medical issues go back to his time at SeaTac. Incarcerated there in 2023, he says he submitted several requests for follow-up medical treatment after his 2022 colonoscopy and as his symptoms appeared to worsen.

While at SeaTac, he was part of a group of inmates who spoke to the Seattle Times in an article published in February of this year about serious delays in medical care at that prison.

It was after this story published that Thornhill was moved to Sheridan.

He says he believes the move was punishment for speaking out about conditions at SeaTac.

Advertisement

In response to questions on Thornhill’s claims, the BOP said, “We cannot speak to this particular case, but FBOP does not tolerate staff misconduct, including retaliation. Consistent with national policy, all allegations of employee misconduct are referred to the FBOP’s Office of Internal Affairs” that are also reviewed by the Office of the Inspector General.

“Allegations of misconduct are thoroughly investigated, and appropriate action is taken if such allegations are sustained, including the possibility of referral for criminal prosecution when appropriate,” the BOP said.

Thornhill says his symptoms have continued to worsen while at Sheridan, and that nothing has happened after his numerous requests to see a doctor and have other tests done.

Requests to be seen by a nurse, doctor or dentist are a multistep process. In order to see medical staff at Sheridan, Thornhill says, inmates submit requests through the prison computer system. Inmates also submit a paper “cop out” or a physical request to be seen by medical staff.

After putting in the requests, inmates go down for sick-call, held four days a week

Advertisement

The Sheridan Admission and Orientation Handbook states this is “the most efficient way to obtain an examination by a physician or an outside specialist.” Inmates explain the “problem to the P.A. or nurse, and they will refer you to a physician, if your condition warrants it.”

For months, Thornhill says, “No matter how many times I put in to see a doctor, they call me down there and I end up seeing another nurse and she basically tells me she doesn’t know what’s going on with me and that she’ll put me in to see the doctor.” He adds that it’s not just him, it’s rare for anyone to see an actual doctor and when they do “it’s for basic stuff” like an ingrown nail.

It’s such a problem that Thornhill alleges inmates are turning to each other to get basic drugs for blood pressure or antibiotics — a not uncommon practice in prison.

In response, a BOP spokesman said the agency “does not comment on the conditions of confinement for any individual or group of individuals in our custody. Nor do we comment on anecdotal allegations.”

The BOP said it “takes pride in protecting and securing individuals entrusted in our custody” and makes “every effort to ensure the physical, medical, and mental safety” of those individuals.

Advertisement

Sheridan employs two medical doctors and one mid-level provider in the prison’s Health Services Department for its 1,539 inmates, according to the agency.

The BOP said in its statement to NPR that “Sheridan provides onsite medical provider coverage 14-hours per day, including weekends and holidays. The FBOP and FCI Sheridan provides essential medical, dental, and mental health services in a manner consistent with accepted community standards for a correctional environment.”

“All incarcerated individuals have daily access to medical care and appointments, and medical staff conduct daily rounds throughout each facility,” the agency continued.

“Each patient is independently treated on a case-by-case basis, and treatment is provided as clinically indicated.”

Only after NPR contacted representatives of Sheridan and the Bureau of Prisons about Thornhill’s situation did Thornhill report to us in mid-July that he finally saw a doctor and a cardiologist, who both agreed “something was wrong and ordered more tests,” he wrote in a letter to his mother shared with NPR.

Advertisement

This development gives Thornhill little confidence.

“I’m trying to be optimistic about it but it’s hard when I’m still in the same position I was. Hopefully they actually get me to the hospital to do these tests! I am going to pray about it and hope for the best,” he wrote to NPR in July.

Luke Thornhill in an old, undated photo. Thornhill is currently incarcerated in a federal prison in Sheridan, Ore., where he says prison officials are not addressing his and other inmates' dire medical needs.

Luke Thornhill in an old, undated photo. Thornhill is currently incarcerated in a federal prison in Sheridan, Ore., where he says prison officials are not addressing his and other inmates’ dire medical needs.

Nancy Richardson


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Nancy Richardson

Thornhill is under lockdown

In late July, Thornhill told NPR that Sheridan was under lockdown. The BOP confirmed that the prison was on “modified operations” but declined to provide specific details “for safety and security reasons.”

As of this week, the BOP confirmed to NPR that, aside from one unit, the prison has returned to normal operations.

Advertisement

For weeks, prison officials seriously curtailed communications and kept inmates in their cells most of the day. Though the lockdown has since been adjusted, Thornhill reports inmates are still only allowed to leave their cells for about 40 minutes a day.

Thornhill’s mother, Nancy Richardson, contacted NPR and lawmakers on his behalf as he’s struggled with medical issues since being incarcerated. She says she was only able to speak with him for five minutes every few days during the lockdown.

She’s 69 and lives in Idaho and hasn’t been able to visit her son since he’s been in federal custody. The lockdown made her more fearful for her son and his health.

“He’s sick and he’s needing medical care, and it’s just disheartening to not be able to do one thing about it,” she says. “I think people need to know what’s going on here.”

At the beginning of August, Thornhill was taken to an emergency room outside the prison via ambulance due to extremely high blood pressure. He has since returned to Sheridan, he and his mother confirmed.

Advertisement

There, he says, he finally received an X-ray of his chest.

News

Nationwide anti-ICE protests call for accountability after Renee Good’s death

Published

on

Nationwide anti-ICE protests call for accountability after Renee Good’s death

A large bird puppet crafted at In the Heart of the Beast Puppet and Mask Theatre in Minneapolis is carried down Lake Street during a march demanding ICE’s removal from Minnesota on Saturday, Jan. 10, 2026.

Ben Hovland/MPR News


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Ben Hovland/MPR News

People have been taking to the streets nationwide this weekend to protest the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement tactics following the death of Renee Good in Minneapolis, a 37-year-old woman who was shot and killed by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer this week.

At least 1,000 events across the U.S. were planned for Saturday and Sunday, according to Indivisible, a progressive grassroots coalition of activists helping coordinate the movement it calls “ICE Out For Good Weekend of Action.”

Leah Greenberg, a co-executive director of Indivisible, said people are coming together to “grieve, honor those we’ve lost, and demand accountability from a system that has operated with impunity for far too long.”

Advertisement

“Renee Nicole Good was a wife, a mother of three, and a member of her community. She, and the dozens of other sons, daughters, friends, siblings, parents, and community members who have been killed by ICE, should be alive today,” Greenberg said in a statement on Friday. “ICE’s violence is not a statistic, it has names, families, and futures attached to it, and we refuse to look away or stay silent.”

Large crowds of demonstrators carried signs and shouted “ICE out now!” as protests continued across Minneapolis on Saturday. One of those protestors, Cameron Kritikos, told NPR that he is worried that the presence of more ICE agents in the city could lead to more violence or another death.

“If more ICE officers are deployed to the streets, especially a place here where there’s very clear public opposition to the terrorizing of our neighborhoods, I’m nervous that there’s going to be more violence,” the 31-year grocery store worker said. “I’m nervous that there are going to be more clashes with law enforcement officials, and at the end of the day I think that’s not what anyone wants.”

Demonstrators in Minneapolis on Saturday, Jan. 10, 2026.

Demonstrators in Minneapolis on Saturday, Jan. 10, 2026.

Sergio Martínez-Beltrán/NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Sergio Martínez-Beltrán/NPR

The night before, hundreds of city and state police officers responded to a “noise protest” in downtown Minneapolis. An estimated 1,000 people gathered Friday night, according to Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara, and 29 people were arrested.

Advertisement

People demonstrated outside of hotels where ICE agents were believed to be staying. They chanted, played drums and banged pots. O’Hara said that a group of people split from the main protest and began damaging hotel windows. One police officer was injured from a chunk of ice that was hurled at officers, he added.

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey condemned the acts of violence but praised what he said was the “vast majority” of protesters who remained peaceful, during a morning news conference.

“To anyone who causes property damage or puts others in danger: you will be arrested. We are standing up to Donald Trump’s chaos not with our own brand of chaos, but with care and unity,” Frey wrote on social media.

Commenting on the protests, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told NPR in a statement, “the First Amendment protects speech and peaceful assembly — not rioting, assault and destruction,” adding, “DHS is taking measures to uphold the rule of law and protect public safety and our officers.”

Advertisement

Good was fatally shot the day after DHS launched a large-scale immigration enforcement operation in Minnesota set to deploy 2,000 immigration officers to the state.

In Philadelphia, police estimated about 500 demonstrators “were cooperative and peaceful” at a march that began Saturday morning at City Hall, Philadelphia Police Department spokesperson Tanya Little told NPR in a statement. And no arrests were made.

In Portland, Ore., demonstrators rallied and lined the streets outside of a hospital on Saturday afternoon, where immigration enforcement agents bring detainees who are injured during an arrest, reported Oregon Public Broadcasting.

A man and woman were shot and injured by U.S. Border Patrol agents on Thursday in the city. DHS said the shooting happened during a targeted vehicle stop and identified the driver as Luis David Nino-Moncada, and the passenger as Yorlenys Betzabeth Zambrano-Contreras, both from Venezuela. As was the case in their assertion about Good’s fatal shooting, Homeland Security officials claimed the federal agent acted in self-defense after Nino-Moncada and Zambrano-Contreras “weaponized their vehicle.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Why men should really be reading more fiction

Published

on

Why men should really be reading more fiction

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

A friend sent a meme to a group chat last week that, like many internet memes before it, managed to implant itself deep into my brain and capture an idea in a way that more sophisticated, expansive prose does not always manage. Somewhat ironically, the meme was about the ills of the internet. 

“People in 1999 using the internet as an escape from reality,” the text read, over an often-used image from a TV series of a face looking out of a car window. Below it was another face looking out of a different car window overlaid with the text: “People in 2026 using reality as an escape from the internet.” 

Oof. So simple, yet so spot on. With AI-generated slop — sorry, content — now having overtaken human-generated words and images online, with social media use appearing to have peaked and with “dumb phones” being touted as this year’s status symbol, it does feel as if the tide is beginning to turn towards the general de-enshittification of life. 

Advertisement

And what could be a better way to resist the ever-swelling stream of mediocrity and nonsense on the internet, and to stick it to the avaricious behemoths of the “attention economy”, than to pick up a work of fiction (ideally not purchased on one of these behemoths’ platforms), with no goal other than sheer pleasure and the enrichment of our lives? But while the tide might have started to turn, we don’t seem to have quite got there yet on the reading front, if we are on our way there at all.

Two-fifths of Britons said last year that they had not read a single book in the previous 12 months, according to YouGov. And, as has been noted many times before on both sides of the Atlantic, it is men who are reading the least — just 53 per cent had read any book over the previous year, compared with 66 per cent of women — both in overall numbers and specifically when it comes to fiction.

Yet pointing this out, and lamenting the “disappearance of literary men”, has become somewhat contentious. A much-discussed Vox article last year asked: “Are men’s reading habits truly a national crisis?” suggesting that they were not and pointing out that women only read an average of seven minutes more fiction per day than men (while failing to note that this itself represents almost 60 per cent more reading time).

Meanwhile an UnHerd op-ed last year argued that “the literary man is not dead”, positing that there exists a subculture of male literature enthusiasts keeping the archetype alive and claiming that “podcasts are the new salons”. 

That’s all well and good, but the truth is that there is a gender gap between men and women when it comes to reading and engaging specifically with fiction, and it’s growing.

Advertisement

According to a 2022 survey by the US National Endowment for the Arts, 27.7 per cent of men had read a short story or novel over the previous year, down from 35.1 per cent a decade earlier. Women’s fiction-reading habits declined too, but more slowly and from a higher base: 54.6 per cent to 46.9 per cent, meaning that while women out-read men by 55 per cent in 2012 when it came to fiction, they did so by almost 70 per cent in 2022.

The divide is already apparent in young adulthood, and it has widened too: data from 2025 showed girls in England took an A-Level in English literature at an almost four-times-higher rate than boys, with that gap having grown from a rate of about three times higher just eight years earlier.

So the next question is: should we care and, if so, why? Those who argue that yes, we should, tend to give a few reasons. They point out that reading fiction fosters critical thinking, empathy and improves “emotional vocabulary”. They argue that novels often contain heroic figures and strong, virtuous representations of masculinity that can inspire and motivate modern men. They cite Andrew Tate, the titan of male toxicity, who once said that “reading books is for losers who are afraid to learn from life”, and that “books are a total waste of time”, as an example of whose advice not to follow. 

I agree with all of this — wholeheartedly, I might add. But I’m not sure how many of us, women or men, are picking up books in order to become more virtuous people. Perhaps the more compelling, or at least motivating, reason for reading fiction is simply that it offers a form of pleasure and attention that the modern world is steadily eroding. In a hyper-capitalist culture optimised for skimming and distraction, the ability to sit still with a novel is both subversive and truly gratifying. The real question, then, is why so many men are not picking one up.

jemima.kelly@ft.com

Advertisement

Continue Reading

News

Slow-moving prisoner releases in Venezuela enter 3rd day after government announces goodwill effort

Published

on

Slow-moving prisoner releases in Venezuela enter 3rd day after government announces goodwill effort

SAN FRANCISCO DE YARE, Venezuela — As Diógenes Angulo was freed Saturday from a Venezuelan prison after a year and five months, he, his mother and his aunt trembled and struggled for words. Nearby, at least a dozen other families hoped for similar reunions.

Angulo’s release came on the third day that families had gathered outside prisons in the capital, Caracas, and other communities hoping to see loved ones walk out after Venezuela ’s government pledged to free what it described as a significant number of prisoners. Members of Venezuela’s political opposition, activists, journalists and soldiers were among the detainees that families hoped would be released.

Angulo was detained two days before the 2024 presidential election after he posted a video of an opposition demonstration in Barinas, the home state of the late President Hugo Chávez. He was 17 at the time.

“Thank God, I’m going to enjoy my family again,” he told The Associated Press, adding that others still detained “are well” and have high hopes of being released soon. His faith, he said, gave him the strength to keep going during his detention.

Minutes after he was freed, the now 19-year-old learned that former President Nicolás Maduro had been captured by U.S. forces Jan. 3 in a nighttime raid in Caracas.

Advertisement

The government has not identified or offered a count of the prisoners being considered for release, leaving rights groups scouring for hints of information and families to watch the hours tick by with no word.

President Donald Trump has hailed the release and said it came at Washington’s request.

On Thursday, Venezuela ’s government pledged to free what it said would be a significant number of prisoners. But as of Saturday, fewer than 20 people had been released, according to Foro Penal, an advocacy group for prisoners based in Caracas. Eight hundred and nine remained imprisoned, the group said.

A relative of activist Rocío San Miguel, one of the first to be released and who relocated to Spain, said in a statement that her release “is not full freedom, but rather a precautionary measure substituting deprivation of liberty.”

Among the prominent members of the country’s political opposition who were detained after the 2024 presidential elections and remain in prison are former lawmaker Freddy Superlano, former governor Juan Pablo Guanipa, and Perkins Rocha, lawyer for opposition leader María Corina Machado. The son-in-law of opposition presidential candidate Edmundo González also remains imprisoned.

Advertisement

One week after the U.S. military intervention in Caracas, Venezuelans aligned with the government marched in several cities across the country demanding the return of Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores. The pair were captured and transferred to the United States, where they face charges including conspiracy to commit narco-terrorism.

Hundreds demonstrated in cities including Caracas, Trujillo, Nueva Esparta and Miranda, many waving Venezuelan flags. In Caracas, crowds chanted: “Maduro, keep on going, the people are rising.”

Acting president Delcy Rodríguez, speaking at a public social-sector event in Caracas, again condemned the U.S. military action on Saturday.

“There is a government, that of President Nicolás Maduro, and I have the responsibility to take charge while his kidnapping lasts … . We will not stop condemning the criminal aggression,” she said, referring to Maduro’s ousting.

On Saturday, Trump said on social media: “I love the Venezuelan people and I am already making Venezuela prosperous and safe again.”

Advertisement

After the shocking military action that overthrew Maduro, Trump stated that the United States would govern the South American country and requested access to oil resources, which he promised to use “to benefit the people” of both countries.

Venezuela and the United States announced Friday that they are evaluating the restoration of diplomatic relations, broken since 2019, and the reopening of their respective diplomatic missions. A mission from Trump’s administration arrived in the South American country on Friday, the State Department said.

Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil responded to Pope Leo XIV, who on Friday called for maintaining peace and “respecting the will of the Venezuelan people.”

“With respect for the Holy Father and his spiritual authority, Venezuela reaffirms that it is a country that builds, works, and defends its sovereignty with peace and dignity,” Gil said on his Telegram account, inviting the pontiff “to get to know this reality more closely.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending