Austin, TX
Texas Gas Service rate hearing at Council this Thursday – Austin Monitor
City Council will host a hearing on Thursday to allow members of the public, particularly customers of Texas Gas Service, to voice their opinions about a large rate increase the utility is proposing. The city has also joined a coalition of cities seeking to convince the Texas Railroad Commission, which makes the final decision about gas rates, to lower the increase that TGS seeks.
Consumer advocate Paul Robbins plans to be on hand for the item, which is on Thursday’s City Council agenda. He has prepared a lengthy explanation of the utility’s proposed rates and compared them with rates charged by CPS Energy in San Antonio. According to Robbins, if Texas Gas Service “gets its proposed rate increase, its residential rates per customer will have risen 105 percent in six years. Inflation between 2019 and 2024 was 23 percent.”
He noted that CPS Energy in San Antonio has had a net rate increase of 7 percent since 2014. Over the 10 years between 2014 and 2024, inflation was 33 percent when the new 2024 rate went into effect, he said.
“I do not believe San Antonio charges any taxes and fees,” he said, concluding, “So the current annual rate of $290 a year (for CPS) is less than half of the proposed rate increase from TGS at $596 a year.”
Safeena Walji, public relations manager for Texas Gas Service, told the Austin Monitor, “Texas Gas Service rates have been determined to be fair and reasonable. According to an internal rates analysis, the average monthly Texas Gas Service bill for Austin residents this year is $60.58, including all taxes and fees. Our rates are set through a rigorous review process conducted by the cities we serve and the Railroad Commission of Texas, making sure any adjustments are just and necessary to cover the costs of providing safe and reliable service.”
Robbins notes that Texas Gas Service has invested heavily in its infrastructure – he said those costs increased by 63 percent in a four-year period. He concludes that the infrastructure investment was the major cause of rate increases over the past five years “even though the company’s residential customer base grew by only 5 percent between 2019 and 2023.”
Walji said, “Our rate adjustments reflect the actual costs of maintaining and improving our infrastructure, including significant safety, reliability and efficiency investments.”
Even though Texas Gas Service is proposing a rate increase for residential customers, it is at the same time proposing to cut rates for industrial and commercial customers, Robbins noted. “TGS proposes a 31 percent increase in residential rates, while proposing a 34 percent decrease for industrial customers and a 7 to 9 percent decrease for commercial customers,” he said.
Robbins also complains that the TGS rate structure hurts lower-income people and discourages conservation. He notes, “Low-income utility customers use less energy than average because they have less disposable income.” He provided a chart from the U.S. Energy Information Agency’s residential energy consumption survey for 2020 in southern states. That chart clearly shows the link between income and residential energy consumption, with residents having the highest incomes also using the most energy and those with lower incomes using less energy. Robbins notes that both Austin Energy and Austin Water have progressive rate structures, charging those who have the highest consumption more than those who have lower consumption.
Austin Energy and Austin Water collectively spend at least $22 million a year in discounts to low-income customers, Robbins noted.
Austin Water rates for residents on the Customer Assistance Program are lower for people using the least amount of water. The opposite seems to be true for Texas Gas Service customers. There are no charts for the TGS customer assistance program for low-income customers, Robbins said, simply because TGS does not have one.
Walji disagreed, saying, “We’re committed to supporting our low-income customers and promoting conservation. Programs like ‘Share the Warmth,’ which we support annually, help with utility bills and encourage customers in need to apply for funds through community partners. These funds are often still available at the end of the year. Our Energy Efficiency program also aids in appliance repairs and updates. These initiatives keep bills manageable, promote energy conservation, and address concerns about their impact on low-income customers and sustainable practices.”
She also said the utility had surveyed its customers in Travis, Williamson and Hays counties, with 64 percent indicating “high trust in their utility to set fair and reasonable rates.” She concluded, “90 percent of responses indicated positive overall satisfaction.”
Austin, as part of the coalition of 17 cities referred to as TGS cities, has legal counsel and rate experts working on the rate case. In July, Council approved a delay that will allow the legal counsel and outside experts to determine their strategy in representing the city, according to materials related to the Council agenda. That material notes that “complaints from TGS customers residing in Austin have triggered the city’s obligation to hold a public hearing.”
Even though Council is holding a hearing on Thursday, they will not be voting on TGS rates for quite some time. Their legal team, led by Thomas Brocato, will meet with lawyers and consultants for TGS and staff of the Railroad Commission, with the goal of reaching an agreement on rates. Should they come to an agreement, Brocato will advise Council, who will then vote on whether to approve the agreement. If they approve it, the matter will go before members of the Railroad Commission for their approval. If Council does not approve the agreement, the matter will still go to the Railroad Commission, but the process will likely take longer. Regardless, nothing is expected to come back to Council before November.
Photo made available through a Creative Commons license.
The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.
You’re a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?
Austin, TX
Texas State announces recipient of 4th annual Austin M. Salyer Community Service Award
Texas State University recognized Aiden Gonzales as the recipient of the Austin M. Salyer Community Service Award during the University Police Department’s (UPD) annual award ceremony on April 28.
The honor celebrates the life and legacy of Austin Salyer, a Bobcat remembered for his commitment to service, integrity, and compassion.
Established in 2023 by the TXST UPD in partnership with Austin’s parents, Bonnie and Rodney Salyer, and the nonprofit Leave No Victim Behind, the award recognizes a student who embodies Salyer’s spirit of selflessness and dedication to others. The endowed scholarship provides $1,000 each year to support a student committed to making a meaningful impact in their community.
A junior majoring in criminal justice with a minor in military science, Salyer was an active member of Alpha Sigma Phi and the TXST Army ROTC. He aspired to serve as a U.S. Army officer and pursue a career in law enforcement. Salyer’s life was tragically cut short on September 16, 2021. His guiding principle, “Do the Right Thing,” continues to inspire the TXST community.
The ceremony brought together university leaders, students, family members, and community partners to honor Gonzales and reflect on Salyer’s enduring legacy of service.
Austin, TX
Was Austin’s Barton Springs sacred to Indigenous people before Europeans showed up?
This story was originally part of KUT’s ATXplained Live show at Bass Concert Hall on October 29, 2025. Get tickets to our next show on May 21 here.
Anyone who knows me, knows I love Barton Springs. It feels like the water has magical properties. Even sacred properties.
So when Brendan Cavanagh asked about the it, I knew I needed to look into it.
“Why were the springs sacred before Uncle Billy showed up?” he asked. “And what was the Indigenous population’s relationship with them?”
By Uncle Billy, he means William Barton, the man who laid claim to the springs in 1837 when he settled there with his family and the people he enslaved.
I assumed Brendan’s question came from a place of love for the springs and general curiosity. But when I talked to him about his question, he mentioned the White Shaman mural, a piece of rock art that sits in the desert about 220 miles west of Austin. Archaeologists say the White Shaman was painted around 400 B.C. It’s really big — 26 feet long and 13 feet high.
Chester Leeds
/
Witte Museum, San Antonio Texas
“I learned that the springs are actually part of that mural,” Cavanagh said. “Which was astonishing to me.”
Archeologists think the mural shows a creation story. But some people think it’s even more than that.
Gary Perez is the chief of the Coahuiltecan/Pakahua Nation. He has come to believe that it not only tells a creation story, but that it’s also an ancient map of Central Texas.
A pictograph on the mural shows a curved line with four matching symbols that look like knives with gray handles and white blades coming off of it at regular intervals.
Chester Leeds
/
Witte Museum, San Antonio, Texas
Perez says that this pictograph represents four sacred springs: San Antonio Springs, San Marcos Springs, Comal Springs and Barton Springs. All of these springs are connected to the Edwards Aquifer, an underground network of caves and porous limestone.
Perez overlaid this part of the White Shaman mural out on a modern map with the help of a mapping expert.
“Then they did. And that was it,” Perez said. “Then we knew we were looking at a map for sure.”
Perez doesn’t think the White Shaman mural just a map, but also a calendar. He said it’s like the Mayan calendar, but for hunter-gatherers.
“These calendars exist everywhere, but this particular one is specific to Central Texas,” he said.
Perez sees the mural as a scientific tool.
There are people who agree with that interpretation of the White Shaman mural. But there are people who disagree, including Harry Shafer, a former curator of archeology at the Witte Museum, which manages the White Shaman site.
“We have a really good handle on the archeology of the Lower Pecos region and Central Texas,” Shafer said. “There’s no tie in Lower Pecos to Central Texas.”
So does the White Shaman mural depict four springs in Central Texas — including Barton Springs? Depends on whose science you believe.
Ancient history
What we do know for sure is that people have lived around Barton Springs for millennia. The archaeological record at Barton Springs goes back 13,000 years.
People were drawn to the area for its abundant water and the plant and animal life. But the people who lived around the springs back then weren’t the same people who lived at the springs when William Barton arrived.
We don’t even know the names of these ancient peoples. Did they have a sacred relationship with the springs? Maybe. We may never know the exact details.
But we do know something about the Indigenous people who came later.
In 1837, we know there were the Comanche, Tonkawa, Caddo, Lipan Apache and Coahuiltecan people in the area, among others. We know some of those people had a sacred relationship with the springs, but the accounts we have are from colonists.
These were all very different cultures who spoke different languages and believed different things.
By the time William Barton showed up, Europeans had already been in the area for 100 years. The Spanish had missions near Barton Springs in the 1700s. Their arrival brought sickness and death to the Indigenous population.
Barton lived in Austin during the Texas Republic, when many of the tribes that lived here were killed or forcibly removed.
Then, there were other ways that Native Americans were erased. At one point, a law was passed legally redesignating Native people as Mexican.
This campaign to erase Indigenous people in Texas worked, at least in our collective imagination as a state.
“In Texas there’s this sort of as assumption there’s no more Indians here,” said Craig Campbell, an anthropology professor at the University of Texas at Austin. “When, in fact, we have this absolutely huge population of Indigenous people that rarely gets recognized.”
Texas has the fifth-largest population of Indigenous people in the country. According to the U.S. Census, there are over 700,000 people in Texas who identity, at least in part, as Indigenous.
Barton Springs are still sacred
Some modern-day Indigenous Texans have their own sacred relationship with Barton Springs. Every August, a group of mostly women makes a pilgrimage to the four sacred springs, led by Gary Perez’s wife, Matilde Torres.
At each site, they commune with the water and offer prayers. They start at San Antonio Springs at dawn and end up at Barton Springs in the afternoon.
Diana Dos Santos has gone on the pilgrimage for the last three years.
She said it’s a long day, but it doesn’t really feel long.
“The whole day feels like it just merges into a short moment,” she said. “It’s like the whole world — the past, the present, everything — just merges into one moment. And when you’re present there — with your prayer, with your medicine, with the other sisters — it’s incredible. It’s magical.”
Support for ATXplained comes from H-E-B. Sponsors do not influence KUT’s editorial decisions.
Austin, TX
$767 million bond could be coming to Austin voters in November
AUSTIN (KXAN) — After roughly a year and a half of work, the task force that’s been tapped to recommend a 2026 bond package to Austin City Council is out with its recommendations.
The task force has identified a package that would cost the city roughly $767 million and would tackle major projects in affordable housing, parks, transportation and flood mitigation.
It’s one of three options city council is expected to consider later this month. Another comes from a group of city council members who pitched a more than $400 million option that largely funds parks and recreation.
The third, a final proposal from city staff, is expected to be released later this month. Staff have already produced a draft proposal worth roughly $700 million.
How much would these cost you? City staff previously said that for every $100 million in additional debt the city takes on, the average Austin homeowner will see their bill go up by $14.34 annually.
‘The needs … outstrip our debt capacity’
The city has identified far more needs than it can fund — with estimates ranging into the billions — while its bond capacity is only around $700 to $750 million.
The Bond Election Advisory Task Force (BEATF) set out to identify the most pressing of those unmet needs.
“The needs in our community outstrip our debt capacity. We have more needs, very deeply felt, than we can afford to do,” a member of the BEATF said during a Monday meeting.
In the end, the BEATF landed on a $766.5 million pitch with the following funding buckets:
- $200 million: Affordable housing
- $175 million: Parks and open space
- $106 million: Facilities (libraries, museums, the Austin animal center)
- $25 million: Homeless Strategy Office (helping fund a new 1,200 bed shelter)
- $147 million: Transportation
- $113 million: Storm and flood mitigation infrastructure
You can find the full list of recommended projects here.
Council members pitch second option
Last month, Austin city council members asked the BEATF to consider an alternate option that would include a smaller bond in 2026 and potentially going back to voters in 2028.
In a message board post those council members pitched the following for a 2026 bond:
• $250-$260 million for parks projects, not including any maintenance facilities
• $50-$60 million for community facilities, such as libraries and cultural arts
• $75-$80 million for active transportation projects
“Should this option ultimately be pursued, we would then use the work of the BEATF and staff for the non-parks categories as the starting point for a 2028 bond discussion,” the council members said.
In the end the BEATF put together a second option — which is not their preferred option, but satisfies the ask from some council members — that would come in at $436 million.
The breakdown is:
- $225 million: Parks and open space
- $106 million: Facilities
- $25 million: Homeless Strategy Office
- $80 million: Transportation
You can find the breakdown of that option here.
-
Technology2 minutes agoHumanoid robot named ‘Gabi’ ordained as Buddhist monk, pledges devotion to ‘holy Buddha’
-
Business8 minutes agoCalifornia tech company Cloudflare to lay off more than 1,000 workers, cites AI
-
Entertainment15 minutes agoJames Cameron once said ‘Avatar’ Neytiri design began with a young Q’orianka Kilcher. Now, she’s suing
-
Lifestyle20 minutes agoThe case for monogramming everything you own and love
-
Politics27 minutes agoNewsom pledges to move forward with Delta water tunnel in California
-
Science32 minutes agoDirty mind? Study suggests gut movement may flush excess material from our brains
-
Sports38 minutes ago
Kyle Loftis, street racing media pioneer who founded 1320Video, dies at 43
-
World51 minutes agoAs US and Iran weigh peace deal, stranded seafarers wait in limbo