Connect with us

Finance

Austin council member Paige Ellis may have violated campaign finance rules again

Published

on

Austin council member Paige Ellis may have violated campaign finance rules again

Austin City Council Member Paige Ellis listens to public testimony on Wednesday, Aug. 16, 2023 at City Hall. The District 8 representative, who is running for re-election this year, has previously faced scrutiny for campaign finance practices.

Mikala Compton/Austin American-Statesman

Austin City Council member Paige Ellis has again accepted campaign contributions that appear to exceed city limits, according to recent campaign finance reports, raising questions about compliance with local election law as she seeks a third term representing Southwest Austin.

Under current city rules, candidates for City Council or mayor may not accept more than $450 per contributor per election. The limit applies to individual donors, with exceptions only for the candidate and small-donor political committees.

Article continues below this ad

Campaign finance reports filed in July 2025 and January 2026 show Ellis accepted nearly $2,500 in contributions that exceeded the $450 individual cap. At least 12 donors gave more than the legal limit, either through single donations above $450 or through multiple contributions across the reporting period that cumulatively exceeded the cap.

Advertisement

In some cases, donors made two or more contributions during the reporting period that, when combined, pushed their total giving beyond the limit. In other instances, donors appeared to list themselves both individually and jointly with a spouse or partner in ways that resulted in total contributions exceeding what is allowed.

Ellis’ campaign manager, Mykle Tomlinson, said he was aware of the $450 cap for individual contributors. Ellis and Tomlinson both said they believed married couples could contribute up to $900 combined, based on each spouse being allowed to give $450.

“As long as the couple hasn’t given over $900, it’s within the limits,” Ellis said. She added that this interpretation applies even when one spouse gives jointly and then later gives individually, calling it a “working definition” that campaigns have followed for years.

Article continues below this ad

Read More: Austin City Council members push to ease spending rules before vote

Advertisement

Ellis said she personally knows the donors and is aware of which contributors are married, even if both spouses’ names are not listed on campaign finance forms.

However, official guidance from both the Texas Ethics Commission and the City of Austin requires contributors to list their full name on campaign finance reports.

“If a finance report listed an amount above $450 with only one name, that would be an issue for the city’s Ethics Review Commission to review,” city spokesperson Jenny LaCoste-Caputo said in a statement Wednesday.

Article continues below this ad

Central Texas-based ethics attorney Andrew Cates called it “common sense” to list contributions under two names from a married couple to clarify that those donations come from both people, adding that the whole reporting system is in place so there is no confusion about where the money is coming from.

Advertisement

“If it’s combined, then say it’s combined,” he said. “It’s not that hard.”

City rules state that the candidate is responsible for filing required reports.

Campaign finance violations are reviewed by the city’s Ethics Review Commission. Ellis’ husband, Edward Espinoza, served on the commission from July 2023 through March 2025. He also previously served as Ellis’ campaign treasurer.

Article continues below this ad

Asked whether Espinoza’s service on the commission posed a conflict of interest, Tomlinson said Ellis recused herself during Espinoza’s appointment by the mayor. He added that the commission often struggled to achieve a quorum during that period and that other council members supported Espinoza’s appointment.

Advertisement

“It doesn’t seem like anyone thought it was a conflict of interest,” Tomlinson said.

Read More: Austin’s proposed tax hike follows behind-the-scenes budget maneuvering

This is not the first time Ellis has faced scrutiny over campaign finance practices. In 2022, the Ethics Review Commission considered a complaint alleging 56 violations related to her campaign, including accepting contributions above city limits and failing to provide required donor employment information.

Article continues below this ad

Commissioners dismissed the allegations related to donor information but found that Ellis had accepted excessive contributions. Ellis acknowledged the violations and was sanctioned with a letter of notification. She later issued refunds for the amounts in question.

Advertisement

In a written statement, Tomlinson said the commission “dismissed the lion’s share of complaints” and found that seven transactions — totaling about $20 — exceeded contribution limits by small amounts. Those funds were refunded and reflected in a subsequent campaign finance report, he said.

Ellis is running for re-election to a third term representing District 8. Because city rules generally limit members to two terms, she will have to collect signatures from at least 5% of eligible voters in her district to appear on the ballot. 

Article continues below this ad

So far, Ellis has drawn one challenger: Selena Xie, a former Austin EMS Association president, EMS commander and ICU nurse, who announced her candidacy in July. 

Voters will decide the District 8 race in the Nov. 3 election. Council districts 1, 3, 5 and 9 will also be on the ballot this November.

Advertisement

Finance

Proximo Congress 2026: US Energy & Infrastructure Finance | Insights | Mayer Brown

Published

on

Proximo Congress 2026: US Energy & Infrastructure Finance | Insights | Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a proud sponsor of Proximo Congress 2026. This senior meeting of the US energy, infrastructure, and digital infrastructure finance community is shaped around the questions credit and investment committees are actually asking in 2026: how asset classes are converging, how risk is being priced in a recalibrated policy and geopolitical environment, and how public and private capital are being structured together to deliver projects at scale.

Mayer Brown has also been recognized for three separate awards which will be presented during the event. These awards include:

  • Proximo North America Transport Deal of the Year 2025 – SR 400 Peach Partners
  • Proximo North America Rail Deal of the Year 2025 – Brightline West
  • Proximo North America LNG Deal of the Year 2025 – Port Arthur LNG 2

For more information, visit the event website. 

Continue Reading

Finance

What are nonconforming mortgages and what are the risks?

Published

on

What are nonconforming mortgages and what are the risks?

If you have ever taken out a mortgage, you’ll know there are a lot of requirements to meet. You may need to put down a certain amount and have a debt-to-income ratio below a certain threshold. You may also run into limits on how much you can borrow or what sources of income the lender will count.

These rules do not apply to all mortgages — just to conforming mortgages, which is what the majority of borrowers take out. However, mortgage lenders are increasingly offering what are known as nonconforming loans, or mortgages that do not “comply with every one of the strict standards put in place after the housing crisis,” said The Wall Street Journal. While “still a small portion,” the “share of mortgages using alternative lending practices” has “doubled in size over the past three years.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Financial Stress Is Changing What Consumers Value in Credit Cards | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Financial Stress Is Changing What Consumers Value in Credit Cards | PYMNTS.com

What U.S. consumers ask of their credit cards has changed. For financially stressed households, it has little to do with rewards.

As more households turn to credit cards to manage liquidity and cover everyday expenses, a new set of practical concerns is driving card behavior: Can the card help avoid a missed payment? Can it make balances easier to track? Can it provide enough visibility into available credit and upcoming obligations to help manage an uncertain month?

Those concerns are beginning to reorder what consumers value most in their credit card relationships.

That evidence is clear in “Winning Top of Wallet: How Credit Card Apps Shape Choice,” a PYMNTS Intelligence and Elan Credit Card report examining how consumers use mobile apps to manage spending, payments and engagement across their credit card portfolios. The report found 30% of consumers primarily use credit cards to build credit or extend purchasing power, while another 22% primarily use cards for cash flow management, together outweighing rewards-based usage.

The divide is more pronounced among financially stressed households. Among consumers living paycheck to paycheck and struggling to pay bills, 40% cited credit dependence as their primary reason for using credit cards. Just 11% pointed to rewards.

Advertisement

For a growing share of consumers, credit cards are functioning less like discretionary spending products and more like liquidity management tools.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

What Matters Most

That evolution is also changing which app features matter most.

Among cash flow-focused consumers, 31% said scheduling payments or autopay encouraged them to spend more on a card, while 27% cited alerts and reminders. Credit-motivated consumers showed similarly high engagement with tools tied to available credit visibility and payment timing.

Rewards still influence spending behavior, particularly among financially stable households. Half of consumers who prioritize rewards said tracking or redeeming rewards through a mobile app encouraged them to spend more on the card.

Advertisement

But the report suggests that financial stress changes the hierarchy of engagement. As household budgets tighten, rewards become less central than predictability, visibility and control.

That shift helps explain why mobile apps increasingly influence which cards become top of wallet.

Among credit-dependent consumers, 77% said the quality of a credit card app influences which card they use most often. Credit-dependent consumers also reported the highest app adoption levels, with 77% using their primary card’s app regularly or occasionally.

The competition, in other words, is no longer simply about card acquisition. It is about becoming the card consumers rely on to navigate everyday financial management.

Digital Experience Becomes a Financial Retention Tool

The report also suggests that digital experience increasingly shapes retention risk.

Advertisement

Nearly 1 in 4 cardholders said a poor app or digital experience contributed to reduced card use. Among Gen Z consumers, that figure climbed to 45%.

At the same time, 7 in 10 cardholders said app quality influences which card becomes their primary card, underscoring how mobile interfaces are becoming embedded directly into consumer payment behavior.

For issuers, the implications extend beyond app design.

Consumers living paycheck to paycheck hold nearly as many credit cards as financially stable households, meaning financially stressed consumers are not disengaging from credit entirely. Instead, they are becoming more selective about which cards feel easiest to manage and most useful during periods of financial pressure.

Rewards and promotional offers still matter, particularly among affluent and financially stable consumers. But for a growing segment of households, the most valuable card may be the one that reduces uncertainty around balances, payment timing and available liquidity.

Advertisement

In a crowded multi-card market, financial visibility itself is becoming part of the product.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending