Connect with us

New Hampshire

Murder conviction. Bankruptcy. FBI sting. House candidate would like to explain. • New Hampshire Bulletin

Published

on

Murder conviction. Bankruptcy. FBI sting. House candidate would like to explain. • New Hampshire Bulletin


Hudson and Litchfield voters will have three choices in a two-seat floterial House race in the September Republican primary: a longtime incumbent, a former legislator, and a man who moved into a Hudson rental about two months ago. 

Mark Edgington, 53, is unique in other ways too. 

In 1989, Edgington pleaded “no contest” to the second-degree murder of a Florida man he says he did not kill. A candidate running on fiscal responsibility, Edgington declared bankruptcy in 2004. He sued an FBI agent in 2021 after his Keene radio station was raided as part of a child pornography investigation. (He was never charged.) 

Edgington, who arrived in New Hampshire in 2006, is a transplant from Florida via the Free State Project, and he distrusts the government. He is also the only candidate in the race with the backing of House Majority Leader Jason Osborne, an Auburn Republican who has called Edgington a close friend for 20 years. 

Advertisement

“I’m going to do what I can to get him elected,” Osborne said. “I know there is one (candidate) I can count on for a vote every time. The other two, I’m not sure.”

The “other two” served alongside Osborne for years: Rep. Ralph Boehm, of Litchfield, who is seeking a ninth term, and former House member Kimberly Rice of Hudson. Rice did not return a message and Boehm believes Osborne recruited Edgington to oust him over a bill that sought to change the date of the state primary election. Osborne backed it. Boehm did not. It failed.

Osborne and Edgington, who moved from Walpole to run in Hudson, rejected that claim. Edgington said he would have moved and run elsewhere had he known two Republicans were running for the two seats. 

“I can see why people would come to this conclusion,” Edgington said. “But I would ask people, ‘Would you seriously pick me to primary somebody?’”

In a pair of interviews this week, Edgington laid out a short list of undefined legislative priorities – parental rights, gun freedoms, and reining in government spending – and the reasons he believes he’s a good choice for voters despite his recent arrival to the district and his 1989 conviction for murder, something he referred to as a “mistake.”  

Advertisement

“I would prefer that the whole world forget about it,” Edgington said. “That’s not going to happen. I don’t know why my biggest mistake at 17 is so very important when so rarely are someone’s mistakes at 17.”

Edgington was sentenced to 25 years in a Florida prison in 1989 for the murder of a motel manager in Manatee County, Florida. It was five years shorter than his co-defendant’s, Carmen Tungate.

Edgington was initially charged with being an accessory after the fact, not murder, in the beating and strangulation death of Ballapuram Umakanthan. Edgington said this week that charge was warranted because he hid in the bathroom while Tungate beat Umakanthan to death. Edgington then helped Tungate escape to Florida and later lied to the police, he said.

Authorities upgraded the charge to first-degree murder after someone reported to the authorities that Edgington had described having a bigger role in the murder, according to a police affidavit. In the affidavit, a police investigator recounted what the informant had reported.

“(Tungate) held (the victim) down while… (Edgington) strangled him until he was dead (defendant saw blood come out of Ballapuram ears),” it said. “(Edgington) then drove (Tungate) to the airport.”

Advertisement

Edgington said this week that the informant concocted that story out of spite because they were vying for the attention of the same woman. And, “he was someone who liked to be listened to,” Edgington said.

Edgington and Tungate negotiated their first-degree charges down by pleading no contest to second-degree, accepting their sentences without admitting guilt to the murder. Edgington maintained his innocence this week and said he accepted prison time because he believed Florida’s sentencing laws would let him leave in three years, about as long as it would take to go to trial. 

He served eight. 

“I’m not claiming to have been innocent. I’m not saying that,” Edgington said. “I am saying I was charged inaccurately. And had I not been there, the outcome would have been the same. This is something I cling to. I really really believe the outcome would have been the same had I not been there.”

Edgington left prison in 1998.

Advertisement

He found his way into radio, selling ads and then launching a radio show in Florida. On Labor Day 2006, he and a friend from the station, Ian Freeman, heard about the Free State Project and relocated to New Hampshire. 

Freeman was sentenced to eight years in federal prison in 2003 for a bitcoin money laundering scheme and in February ordered to pay $3.5 million in restitution to 29 victims.

In 2004, while still in Florida, Edgington declared bankruptcy, estimating his debts to be between $100,000 to $500,000. That included nearly $60,000 in credit card debt. Edgington said he eventually paid off individuals who had given him money but not the credit card companies. 

“I made some investments that in retrospect were too risky,” he said. “I found the best way out was to get out of it. I do not claim to have been a completely whole person when I walked out of prison.”

Edgington was back in court in 2021, this time in New Hampshire, when he sued an FBI agent who had seized equipment from his Keene radio station during a child pornograpy investigation. Edgington said he believes someone set him up; no charges were filed.

Advertisement

In his federal lawsuit, Edgington demanded the items be returned and a “non-apology letter” from the FBI acknowledging the inconvenience the seizure of his equipment had caused.

Oborne told the Bulletin he was pleased but surprised when Edgington told him he was running. He knew the murder conviction would be hard to overcome. Edgington knew that too, he said. 

He’d prefer voters consider his long career in radio, the absence of further criminal charges, and his work as a volunteer firefighter. 

“The best thing I can do is live my life in the best way I can, to be the best person I can be,” he said. “And to do good things. I’ve been given a chance and I feel I haven’t squandered that chance. I don’t drink anymore. I don’t smoke anymore. I don’t do drugs anymore. I make good decisions and get good outcomes.”

Advertisement



Source link

New Hampshire

Townsend man arrested in connection with two armed robberies in New Hampshire and New Jersey, authorities say – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Townsend man arrested in connection with two armed robberies in New Hampshire and New Jersey, authorities say – The Boston Globe


Authorities allege Joseph Sawyer brandished what appeared to be a handgun during a robbery at St. Mary’s Bank in Nashua, N.H., on June 12.Boston FBI

A Townsend man was arrested Wednesday night in connection with two armed bank robberies in New Hampshire and New Jersey last month, federal authorities said.

Joseph Sawyer, 52, was arrested by FBI Albany’s SWAT team after the bureau’s Boston office and Nashua, N.H., police learned he might be in upstate New York, FBI Boston said in a statement Thursday.

Investigators said the alleged robberies happened at St. Mary’s Bank on Northwest Boulevard in Nashua on June 12 and at a Chase Bank in Boonton, N.J., on June 27.

During both robberies, prosecutors allege Sawyer brandished what appeared to be a black semiautomatic handgun, ordered everyone inside the banks to get on the ground, and demanded their cell phones before stealing cash, according to a criminal complaint filed in New Hampshire federal court.

Advertisement

The complaint alleges Sawyer stole $6,000 from the Nashua bank before fleeing in a Honda minivan. Investigators say he discarded a shopping bag containing the bank manager’s cell phone in a nearby parking lot before driving away.

Investigators linked the two robberies through surveillance footage and license plate reader data, according to court filings. Authorities allege the minivan was driven with stolen New Jersey plates during the Boonton robbery that were later replaced with Massachusetts plates registered to Sawyer’s late father.

Sawyer was charged with one count of bank robbery in New Hampshire, court records show. It was not immediately clear Thursday night if he is being represented by an attorney.

The case is being prosecuted by the United States Attorney’s office for the District of New Hampshire, the FBI said.


Breanne Kovatch can be reached at breanne.kovatch@globe.com. Follow her @breannekovatch.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Trans athletes drop lawsuit to gain access to girls’ sports in New Hampshire after SCOTUS ruling

Published

on

Trans athletes drop lawsuit to gain access to girls’ sports in New Hampshire after SCOTUS ruling


A pair of trans athletes in New Hampshire have dismissed their lawsuit to challenge the state law that protects girls’ sports after the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Title IX ruling on June 30.

Advertisement

The trans teenage plaintiffs, Parker Tirrell and Iris Turmelle, originally filed the lawsuit in 2024 to challenge a current New Hampshire state law prohibiting trans athletes from participating in girls’ sports. The lawsuit later expanded to add President Donald Trump’s administration to the defendants after Trump signed the “No Men in Women’s Sports” executive order on Feb. 5, 2025.

The lawyers for the trans athletes claimed Trump’s executive order, along with parts of a Jan. 20 executive order that forbids federal money from being used to “promote gender ideology,” subjects the teens and all transgender girls to discrimination in violation of federal equal protection guarantees and their rights under Title IX.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

A transgender athlete and the Supreme Court (Getty Images)

The U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire then ruled last year that female athletes represented by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) attorneys were permitted to intervene in the case to defend the state’s women’s sports law and the administration’s executive orders.

Advertisement

Now, after the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling, which protects state laws that ensure only females compete in girls’ sports, there is no room for the trans teens to fight the law in New Hampshire.

“Women and girls deserve privacy, safety, and equal opportunities. That can’t happen when males are competing in women’s sports, taking spots on women’s athletic teams, and winning women’s championships,” ADF Senior Counsel and Vice President of Litigation Strategy Jonathan Scruggs said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital.

USA POWERLIFTING, ONCE IN TRANS ATHLETE LAWSUIT, SUPPORTS SCOTUS RULING: ‘LAW HAS CAUGHT UP WITH THE SCIENCE’

“President Trump’s executive orders and New Hampshire’s law recognize common sense and track Title IX, the federal law that ensures equal opportunities for women in athletics. We are grateful this case is coming to an end and that New Hampshire is free to protect its female athletes.”

Fox News Digital has reached out to Tirrell and Turmelle’s attorneys at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) for a response.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

A protester waves a transgender pride flag outside of the U.S. Supreme Court Building on June 18, 2025 in Washington, DC. Advocates organized a rally in response the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in US v. Skrmetti, in which the justices ruled to uphold state bans on gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The SCOTUS rulings in West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox, the high court upheld state laws requiring student-athletes to compete on sports teams that correspond with their biological sex at birth rather than their gender identity, in a 6-3 decision.

However, there are still 23 states, including California, New York and Massachusetts, that don’t have any such laws, and some of those have laws to protect trans athletes in girls’ sports.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

New Hampshire Gov. signs law requiring schools to out trans kids

Published

on

New Hampshire Gov. signs law requiring schools to out trans kids


New Hampshire Gov. Kelly Ayotte has signed legislation requiring public school employees to disclose information about transgender students to their parents or legal guardians, reversing a 2024 state Supreme Court ruling that upheld students’ privacy rights in certain circumstances.

Advertisement

Ayotte’s office announced on 2 July that the legislation had been signed into law. Under SB 430, educators must respond to written requests from parents for “material information” about their child, even if a student has asked that the information be kept confidential or fears negative consequences at home.

Supporters of the legislation, such as Republican state Senator Tim Lang, argue the measure strengthens parental rights and enables families to better support children who may be struggling. “If you don’t tell the parent, the parent can’t watch for the signs of self-harm,” Lang told New Hampshire Public Radio.

Educators and LGBTQ+ advocates, however, say the law places teachers in an impossible position by forcing them to choose between complying with the law and protecting vulnerable students. Megan Tuttle, president of NEA-New Hampshire, the state’s largest teachers’ union, said in a statement that the legislation is “vaguely written and risks putting educators in a position of outing a student.” She added that schools should remain places where every student feels “safe, seen, and free to be themselves.”

Aimee Terravechia, executive director of LGBTQ+ advocacy group 603 Equality, warned the law could erode trust between students and educators while speaking with New Hampshire Public Radio. “Schools should be a place of learning… and a place of critical self-examination,” she said. “Placing educators into a role of monitoring and reporting removes the trust necessary for a thriving academic environment.”

Advertisement

The legislation also effectively overturns a 2024 New Hampshire Supreme Court decision, in which justices ruled that keeping a student’s gender identity confidential did not unlawfully interfere with parents’ rights, noting that parents still retained numerous ways to support and communicate with their children outside the classroom.

Share your thoughts! Let us know in the comments below, and remember to keep the conversation respectful.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending