Connect with us

Washington, D.C

Editorial: DC elites should try living on an average wage

Published

on

Editorial: DC elites should try living on an average wage


When was the last time Joe Biden bought a loaf of bread? The president has people for that, and the wherewithal to cover the cost of even the most artisanal of brioches.

Considering his long career in politics — nearly 50 years as senator, vice president and now president — the days where Biden had to work out a family budget are long past him.

For Biden, and members of Congress on both sides of the aisle, the Beltway is a cocoon of privilege unknown to most Americans. DC pols get most of their health coverage paid for, make six-figure salaries, and the longer they’re in office, remain far removed from the daily realities of their constituents.

Washington needs a reality check.

Advertisement

Back in 2014 when Congress was debating raising the minimum wage, Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio) took a “live the wage challenge” – to live on pay of $7.25 per hour for a week.

As CNN reported, Ryan and his wife had $154 for his family of two pre-teen children and a newborn. After an unexpected expense for the baby, Ryan said he was going to have buy hamburger meat and not steak, sardines instead of salmon. Or forgo meat altogether for rice and beans.

Going to the movies was out, and summer camp for his daughter capsized the budget.

They lost the challenge. “We didn’t make it but it was a great experience,” Ryan said.

How many lawmakers could survive on the median income for constituents in their district? Subtracting what they would pay for health care, rent, food, transportation and sundries — most if not all would hit a financial wall.

Advertisement

The elites in D.C. too often dismiss the concerns of working class Americans. These are the voters who don’t have friends on Nantucket to host them for vacations. Nor are they on the Met Gala red carpet.

They’ve already cut out meat.

They drive what they drive because hopefully, their car is going to last a while and it’s what they can afford. They’re the ones without a 401(k), who will likely depend on Social Security, but fear it won’t be enough to live on. They’re in the 65% of Americans who live paycheck to paycheck.

A car repair, medical bill or unexpected expense can be catastrophic.

How many on Capitol Hill can relate?

Advertisement

Some lawmakers do work hard for their constituents, and are mindful of the realities of the non-rich. Too many others are clueless.

So let’s revive the wage challenge. Let those in Congress who purport to understand the struggles of ordinary citizens step up and live within the confines of an average salary.

Let them come up with ideas on saving for retirement, buying an electric car, and providing their children with educational enrichment.

The economy isn’t abstract for most Americans. When inflation spikes and interest rates follow, they feel it. Their children feel it. The graphs and charts and assurances that all will be well mean nothing when you have more month than money. The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that inflation was still holding firm as of March and a Fed interest rate cut looks unlikely. Credit card bills will reflect this.

Here’s a chance for the Beltway crowd to show just how in tune they are with the American people. It could provide a sobering lesson for lawmakers who have no clue what the contents of their refrigerators cost.

Advertisement

Hopefully, it would be a teaching moment.

Any takers?

 

Editorial cartoon by Steve Kelley (Creators Syndicate)



Source link

Advertisement

Washington, D.C

DMV residents sue Trump administration over public golf course revamp

Published

on

DMV residents sue Trump administration over public golf course revamp


Two recreational golfers from the D.C. area have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging efforts to overhaul the East Potomac Golf Links and alleging the move could undermine its long-standing role as a public park.

Golfers and preservation group file legal challenge to Trump administration plans

What we know:

Advertisement

Dave Roberts, a Washington, D.C. resident, and Alex Dickson of Arlington, along with the D.C. Preservation League, are suing the Department of Interior and the National Park Service. The lawsuit claims the Trump administration’s plans would turn the public course into one more like a Trump-branded course.

The challengers argue that the agencies violated federal rules that govern how executive agencies must act, including requirements to assess the impact on historic properties and the environment before making major changes.

Advertisement

“That’s just not legal,” Norm Eisen, plaintiffs’ lawyer with Democracy Defenders, told FOX 5 DC. 

The lawsuit points to the course’s origins as a public space, referencing an 1897 congressional designation that the land should be “forever held and used as a park for the recreation and pleasure of the people.”

The challengers say the administration has already taken steps to build a new course, reportedly to be called the Washington National Golf Course.

Advertisement

The legal filing also highlights the history of municipal golf courses in the U.S., noting that East Potomac helped break down social barriers in the sport and integrated Black Americans in the 1940s.

The lawsuit also claims the administration’s actions skip several steps usually required before overhauling public lands.

Advertisement

The other side:

A White House spokesperson said, “President Trump is a champion-level golfer with an extraordinary eye for detail and design. His vision to renovate and beautify Joint Base Andrews’ golf courses will bring much-needed improvements that service members and their families will be able to enjoy for generations to come.”

The administration says the planned renovations will benefit service members, their families and the broader community.

Advertisement

What we don’t know:

It is not yet clear how the Department of Interior and National Park Service will respond to the lawsuit or what the timeline for any changes to the course might be.

Advertisement

The Source: Reporting from Chief Legal Correspondent Katie Barlow and statements from the White House.

Donald J. TrumpNewsD.C. PoliticsPoliticsVirginiaWashington, D.C.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

March Madness is almost here! Grab tickets to see Duke vs. Michigan

Published

on

March Madness is almost here! Grab tickets to see Duke vs. Michigan


With football in the rearview mirror and baseball season still on the horizon, college basketball has officially taken center stage. We’re less than a month away from Selection Sunday, which means the road to March Madness is officially heating up.

The Edward Jones Capital Showcase is taking place this weekend at Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C., including Duke vs. Michigan. Tickets are available now, starting at $287, but they’re moving fast, so if you want to be in the arena for this matchup, don’t miss your chance to grab tickets!

Below, you’ll find everything you need to know about how to get Duke Blue Devils vs. Michigan Wolverines tickets in Washington, D.C.

Duke vs. Michigan tickets in Washington, D.C.

Tickets to see Duke vs. Michigan at Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, Feb. 21, are starting at $387. But, if you want to sit closer to the college basketball action, tickets in the main concourse are starting at $767.

Advertisement
  • When: Saturday, Feb. 21
  • Where: Capital One Arena in Washington D.C.
  • What time: 6:30 p.m. ET
  • Tickets: Starting at $387



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

DC bishop: Catholics should ‘get the facts’ on immigration, Church teachings

Published

on

DC bishop: Catholics should ‘get the facts’ on immigration, Church teachings


Catholics must educate themselves on “the facts” regarding the U.S. immigration system and the Church’s teachings on the matter, according to Washington, D.C., Auxiliary Bishop Evelio Menjivar-Ayala.

Following his participation in a panel at the New York Encounter titled “Seeking a Home: A Catholic View on the Status of Immigration to the U.S.,” Menjivar-Ayala told EWTN News that he is “very hopeful” about the future of immigration in the U.S. “When people show up for a talk like this, and you see standing room only, that tells you of the great desire of people to get informed, to get educated.”

The D.C. auxiliary bishop emphasized the need to “get the facts,” not only about the immigration system in the U.S. but also where the Church stands on the issue. “For the Church, the first and the most important thing is human dignity,” he said. “It is the dignity of every person, undocumented or citizen.”

While the government must enforce its laws and protect its sovereignty, Menjivar-Ayala said, it is necessary for the government to “look at the eyes of the person, the dignity of every human being,” and to ensure that enforcement is “done in a humane way that respects the dignity of the human person.”

Advertisement

“Let us educate ourselves,” he said, adding: “As they say, the social doctrine of the Church is the best-kept secret. And the Church teaches, has beautiful teachings, about the social dimension of our faith.”

Dialogue with Catholics in the Trump administration

Menjivar-Ayala noted that previous administrations in the past had participated in dialogue with the Catholic Church, consulting with organizations such as the Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc. (CLINIC) on the issue of immigration. However, he said, the current administration has not.

Menjivar-Ayala noted the disparity between the Church’s emphasis on human dignity and the Trump administration’s position that every unauthorized border crossing is a criminal act.

He said we should be careful about narratives surrounding the issue and refrain from categorizing those who cross the border without authorization the same way as perpetrators of crimes such as murder, rape, or theft.

Menjivar-Ayala said criminals should be prosecuted as criminals and not categorized in the same way as immigrants, noting that “immigration laws are a different set of laws than criminal laws” but that the current administration is now “pulling them together.”

Advertisement

Responding to high-ranking officials who are Catholic, such as “border czar” Tom Homan, who has described the Catholic Church as being “wrong” about immigration, Menjivar-Ayala said he believes “it’s a question for them” about “how are you living the Gospel?”

“I would say that the question is not for me, because for me and for the bishops it is very clear. Every person has dignity, and in every migrant, no matter if they are documented or undocumented, we should see the face of Christ,” he said. “So the question is for them, for those who claim to be Catholic but are not seeing the face of Christ in the migrants.”

Menjivar-Ayala stressed the need for one’s politics to be informed by the Gospels and faith, rather than one’s faith being informed by politics or one’s personal views. “It is the Gospel that needs to tell me how I should see the world and not politics,” he said.

Life for the immigrant community in Washington, D.C.

Immigration enforcement among Catholic migrant communities in D.C. is “dying down a bit,” according to Menjivar-Ayala.

Sacred Heart Shrine in the Columbia Heights neighborhood reported that six of its parishioners were detained by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in August 2025, including an usher who was on his way to evening Mass.

Advertisement

Menjivar-Ayala said the immigrant community at Sacred Heart Shrine “has been affected the most” in the city but has also become the most tight-knit. During the panel, Menjivar-Ayala described parishioners in immigrant communities banding together to bring food and provide other support for one another. “I was thinking about that parish,” he said.

“I believe right now it’s dying down a bit, but nobody knows when you are going to have ICE in the streets,” he concluded.

Panel highlights broken system, need for congressional action

For the panel, Menjivar-Ayala was joined by Mario Russell, executive director of the Center for Migration Studies, and Ashley Feasley, a legal expert in residence at The Catholic University of America’s Immigration Law and Policy Initiative.

During her remarks, Feasley described the U.S. immigration system as “old,” having not been reformed since the late 1990s.

“What has happened here is people may have many perspectives about the failures of one president or another on immigration reform,” she said. “But the one place where I think we can really circle in on is the failure of Congress to act regardless of who is in the White House or who controls Congress.”

Advertisement

Feasley noted the presence of a number of comprehensive bills seeking to address border security and asylum but have had a difficult time garnering bipartisan support. This, she said, has ultimately been “one of the biggest problems.”

During his remarks Russell, similarly to Menjivar-Ayala, encouraged Catholics to inform themselves about the immigration system by reading reports such as those from the Center for Migration Studies or from diocesan sources.

“What is happening is basically what is happening,” he said. “Robert Reich, the old labor secretary, recently said, ‘Why would the Immigration Customs Enforcement go to Home Depot to find criminals? Why would they go to a posada or a corner to find criminals? Those are workers,’ so the evidence doesn’t support the narrative.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending