Connect with us

West

Idaho moves to ban use of public funds for transgender surgeries and hormone therapy

Published

on

Idaho moves to ban use of public funds for transgender surgeries and hormone therapy

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

Please enter a valid email address.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive. To access the content, check your email and follow the instructions provided.

Having trouble? Click here.

Idaho is expected to pass a bill this week that would ban public funds from going towards transgender sex change surgeries and hormone therapy treatment on state-owned properties. 

It would also bar state properties, facilities or buildings from being used for surgical procedures pertaining to “gender transitions,” the bill text states. 

Advertisement

House Bill 668, which cleared the state House in a 58-11 vote last week, states public funds “shall not be used… for purposes of altering the appearance of an individual in order to affirm the individual’s perception of the individual’s sex in a way that is inconsistent with the individual’s biological sex regardless of whether the surgical operation or medical intervention is administered to a minor or an adult, except for exempted surgical operations or medical interventions.”

BRYAN KOHBERGER ASKS COURT FOR CHANGE OF VENUE AFTER DELAYS IN IDAHO STUDENT MURDERS TRIAL

A general view of the Idaho State Capitol building on May 23, 2021 in Boise, Idaho. (AaronP/Bauer-Griffin/GC Images)

The bill now heads to the Republican-controlled Senate. If it passes, Gov. Brad Little, a Republican, would have to sign off on it. Little has signed bills in recent years opposing similar issues affecting transgender people. Last year, he signed a bill criminalizing sex reassignment surgeries for minors. He also signed a bill prohibiting transgender students from using public restrooms that do not align with their biological sex. 

The public funds would specifically target Medicaid, the country’s primary federal health insurance program. 

Advertisement

The bill also states that physicians and other medical professionals “in the course and scope of employment by the state or a county or local government may provide the surgical operations or medical interventions.”

IDAHO MURDERS CASE: JUDGE TO CONSIDER BRYAN KOHBERGER ATTORNEY’S REQUEST FOR SUMMER 2025 TRIAL START DATE

Pro-transgender activists clash at pro-women rally in Texas. (Fox News Digital)

If the bill passes, it would make Idaho the 10th state to ban federal funds from going toward transgender surgical procedures and treatment. 

According to the Associated Press, Idaho has had to defend itself against several lawsuits over denying gender transition treatments and surgeries. In one case, the state was ordered to provide a transgender inmate with gender-transition surgery, and the inmate was later awarded roughly $2.5 million in damages.

Advertisement

“This is a taxpayer protection bill in my view,” Rep. Bruce Skaug, R– Idaho, one of the bill’s sponsors, said during a hearing last week. 

Idaho banned transgender sex changes for minors.  (AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley)

If the bill becomes law, the penalties for violations include fines ranging from $300 to $10,000 and the possibility of a prison sentence of up to 14 years. 

At least 23 states, including Idaho, have passed laws banning transgender sex changes and hormone treatment for minors. This month, a leading scientific organization in the U.S. — the American Psychological Association — representing more than 150,000 licensed psychologists, announced a new policy urging clinics to provide “unobstructed access” to gender-transitioning treatments for children.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Arizona

Remains of USS Arizona crew buried as unknowns after Pearl Harbor to be identified

Published

on

Remains of USS Arizona crew buried as unknowns after Pearl Harbor to be identified


The Navy and the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) have dropped their initial opposition to disinterring the graves of battleship Arizona crew members buried more than 80 years ago as unknowns for possible identification and return to their families.

In a late Thursday release, DPAA announced that the Operation 85 advocacy group led by family member Kevin Kline had met the 60% threshold of DNA Family Reference Samples for the number of crew members thought to be buried in the commingled graves at the National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific, known as the “Punchbowl.”

Although DPAA initially opposed the USS Arizona (BB-39) Unknown Identification Project, DPAA extended “its sincere appreciation” to Kline, grandnephew of Arizona crew member Gunner’s Mate 2nd Class Robert Edwin Kline, “and the ‘Operation 85’ team for their devoted efforts over the past three years to locate and connect enough USS Arizona families to help reach this important milestone.”

Last November, Operation 85 announced that they had reached the required 60% threshold for the Arizona, meaning 643 families. However, it has awaited DPAA confirmation since then.

Advertisement

In a phone interview with Military Times Thursday, Kline, who runs a real estate company in Fairfax County, Virginia, with his wife, Elizabeth, said the threshold agreement was a long time coming. He became obsessed with the possibility of identifying the unknowns after attending a DPAA update to the families in Norfolk, Virginia, three years ago.

But he had to go up against a March 2022 report to Congress regarding the cost to identify those buried as unknowns.

“Identifying the Sailors and Marines buried in the [Punchbowl] will cost the Navy and the Marine Corps casualty program offices approximately $2,700,000 for just their portion of the larger effort,” the Navy report said.

While the Navy Department, DPAA and other agencies “agree that the identification of the 85 Unknowns associated with USS ARIZONA and buried at [the Punchbowl] is feasible, it will require significant resources and an inordinate amount of time,” the Navy report said.

In addition, “Pursuing this effort will give false hope to the vast majority of USS Arizona families that their loved one may be identified,” the Navy report said.

Advertisement

However, in the effort to track down families and get their permission for DNA samples, “we turned a hard ‘No’ to a ‘Yes,’ Kline said.”

“It’s wonderful and we’re very excited to have hit this milestone” that will allow exhumations to begin,” Kline said. “But I feel like the work is not done yet, we still have new families to find,” he said. “But it’s much easier now knowing that the DPAA and everybody else is on board and I’m not just a rogue family member doing this alone anymore.”

Kline said that he and other family members were surprised to learn that there were crew members — including his great uncle, Gunners Mate 2nd Class Robert Edwin Kline, who died aboard the Arizona at age 22 — who were not entombed in the Arizona when it was sunk on Dec. 7, 1941.

His great uncle and others may have been blown clear of the ship by the force of the eight bombs that hit the Arizona from Japanese attack planes, Kline said, or by the huge explosion of the Arizona’s ammunition compartment.

The battleship suffered more loss of life than any American ship during the attack, its 1,177 dead comprising nearly half the 2,403 killed at Pearl Harbor.

Advertisement

Of the ship’s dead, 277 of its sailors and Marines are buried in Honolulu’s National Memorial of the Pacific. The identity of at least 85 of those men remain unknown to this day.

Kline’s great uncle and others could be among the remains of those recovered by Navy divers after the war before the mission was deemed too dangerous.

“Growing up in our family — we knew our uncle was never found [because] he was in the ship. That’s where everybody always thought where he was,” Kline said.

The hull of the 608-foot Pennsylvania class battleship Arizona now rests at the bottom of Pearl Harbor as the final resting place for more than 900 of the ship’s 1,177 crewmen who were killed on Dec. 7, 1941.

Above the hull, without ever touching it, is the gracefully stunning Arizona Memorial, officially known as the Pearl Harbor National Memorial, managed by the National Park Service.

Advertisement

The sloping roof of the memorial’s design, crafted by Austrian-American architect Alfred Preis, was intended to convey the profound symbolism of war and remembrance. The roof “sags in the center but stands strong and vigorous at the ends, expressing initial defeat and ultimate victory” in World War II, Preis said after the 1962 dedication of the memorial.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

The state benefiting most from California’s stunning exodus

Published

on

The state benefiting most from California’s stunning exodus


Nevada — known for its vast deserts and audacious gamblers — is luring Californians away from the Golden State at a higher rate than any other.

The Silver State leeched a net 81 Californians per 10,000 residents each year from California between 2016 and 2025, as California undergoes a mass exodus of residents leaving, according to a report.

The report, titled “Priced Out: RELOCATION AMIDST CALIFORNIA’S AFFORDABILITY CRISIS,” was released on March 31 by the nonpartisan California Policy Lab.

Californians move to Nevada at a higher rate than even Texas, the report notes.

Advertisement
A large white Atlas moving truck parked on a residential street in a California suburb. Simone – stock.adobe.com
Aerial view of suburban Las Vegas neighborhood with houses and streets. Wirestock – stock.adobe.com
Panoramic aerial view of Las Vegas, USA, with the city and mountains in the background. Alexander – stock.adobe.com

“Nevada is the standout,” the report says. “News reports often mention Texas, but that is misleading. The most accurate measure of popularity adjusts for state population and shows a clear pattern: proximity reigns. Californians most often leave for nearby states, and California also welcomes new residents from neighboring states most frequently.”

Nevada is a much cheaper state for U.S. residents to live in than California. It has no state income tax, unlike California, and housing prices, along with gas prices, are also lower. California’s average regular gas price was $5.88 on Friday while Nevada’s was $4.99, an 89-cent difference.

 Evan White, a co-author of the study, says the Californians are leaving for more affordable states.

“The price tag has gone up on the California Dream, and many families are leaving the state for more affordable places,” White, the Executive Director of the California Policy Lab at UC Berkeley, said. “The difference these moves make is stark.  Their destination neighborhoods are half as expensive and they end up much more likely to own a home within just a few years.”

The report shows that out-of-state movers pay an average of $672 less per month on housing costs, and home prices are 48% lower. Former California residents are about 48% more likely to own a home in their new state.

Advertisement
Entire view of a residential area from Double Peak Park in San Marcos, California Jason – stock.adobe.com

Higher-income Californians are also leaving at increasingly higher rates, the report said. The share of higher-income Californians leaving has increased from 34% to 40% since the pandemic.

“Our report shows that people who leave California are increasingly leaving from higher-income neighborhoods,” co-author Dr. Brett Fischer, Researcher at the California Policy Lab, said. “These movers are, on average, in a weaker financial position than their neighbors, and may be moving to attain the quality of life they see their neighbors enjoying but they cannot afford.”

From 2010 to 2024, nearly 10 million people left California. The state is considered one of the most expensive states in the nation.

Idaho, Oregon, and Arizona are the next largest net recipients of Californians on a per-capita basis, the report says.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Denver Sues Owner of Your Mom’s House, State of Colorado

Published

on

Denver Sues Owner of Your Mom’s House, State of Colorado


To say Your Mom’s House has had a dramatic 2025 is an understatement.

Emily Ferguson

The City of Denver has no idea what to do with the extra money collected in the city-ordered auction of Your Mom’s House.

Advertisement

Your Mom’s House had a disastrous last few years, with ownership changes, lawsuits and other controversies culminating with the club at 608 East 13th Avenue closing after the property inside was seized by the city for unpaid sales taxes on December 17. The venue had also been operating for months without a liquor license, and multiple employees told state authorities that they were owed money by Pearl Stop LLC owner/YMH operator Jillian Johnson.

When Johnson failed to pay all the taxes that the city said she owed, the Pearl Stop LLC property went up for auction on February 13. To settle the account, the City of Denver has now sued both Pearl Stop LLC, the business that operated Your Mom’s House, as well as the State of Colorado; both have told Denver that the surplus cash raised by the auction belongs to them.

Jillian Johnson standing with two of her employees
Jillian Johnson (front) bought majority ownership of Your Mom’s House in January 2025.

The City of Denver is now asking Denver District Court for a declaration “regarding the disposition of $30,228.35 currently in its possession and subject to claims of entitlement by both defendants in this action,” the complaint reads.

The suit references Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure 22 — which allows a stakeholder to list potential and conflicting claimants into a single lawsuit — and 57, which authorizes courts to make a declaratory judgment. It states that on December 17, 2025, the city issued a distraint warrant against Pearl Stop LLC/Your Mom’s House for unpaid sales and occupational privilege taxes, and seized the business, which “caused [the assets] to be auctioned to the public to satisfy the tax debt owed to Denver.”

The auction raised $46,002, which was paid to the city. “After all outstanding Denver taxes and auction fees were satisfied, $30,228.35 in net auction proceeds remain to which Denver has no legal claim,” the complaint says. “The Denver Revised Municipal Code, § 53-28(a)(4) provides that, in the event surplus funds are collected from an auction resulting from a warrant of distraint, those excess funds are to be returned to the taxpayer, in this case the Pearl Stop.”

Advertisement

Johnson has told the city “on numerous occasions” that she wants to be refunded the surplus funds, according to the complaint. However, the State of Colorado has also provided the city with two warrants for distraint “indicating that the Pearl Stop owes Colorado $39,758.75 and $1,994.00 in unpaid taxes and has requested that Denver provide the $30,228.35 to Colorado to satisfy these Warrants for Distraint.”

The city says it is seeking clarification on “which of the claims made by the defendants in this matter is superior.”

Johnson declined to provide comment for our January 29 cover story on the chaos at Your Mom’s House; we have been unable to reach her regarding this latest development.Westword also reached out to the Denver City Attorneys’ Office for comment.

The Your Mom’s House location is now empty. The owners of Pearl Divers, a club that had shared space with Your Mom’s House, moved their business to the former home of the Mercury Cafe at 2199 California Street and opened The Pearl there last April. On April 15, that business was seized by the city for back taxes, too.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending