Connect with us

World

Why doesn’t NATO impose a no-fly zone over Ukraine?

Published

on

Why doesn’t NATO impose a no-fly zone over Ukraine?

In his handle to British lawmakers within the Home of Commons, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated: “Please make sure that our Ukrainian skies are protected. Please ensure you do what must be performed.”

Together with his impassioned plea, delivered by way of video hyperlink, Zelenskyy was as soon as once more calling for a no-fly zone, beneath which his Western allies would deploy their fighter jets to ward off Russian forces, which for the previous two weeks have been bombarding Ukrainian cities.

Kharkiv, the nation’s second-largest metropolis, has been ravaged by indiscriminate air assaults, leaving the streets stuffed with rubble and bomb craters and dashing all hopes of a quick reconstruction.

To this point, nevertheless, Zelenskyy’s name has been rebuffed.

Even when Western international locations have proven an unwavering resolve to sentence Moscow’s army aggression whereas concurrently unleashing a set of ruinous sanctions to cripple its army equipment, a no-fly zone stays the Rubicon that democracies are unwilling to cross.

Advertisement

A comparatively novel idea, the no-fly zone – or NFZ – was pioneered within the early Nineteen Nineties in the course of the Gulf Conflict, when a coalition of 35 nations teamed as much as push the Iraqi forces of Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait.

The idea is easy: a no-fly zone is a restricted space over which plane of particular origin should not allowed to fly. It could possibly be seen because the aerial equal of a demilitarised zone.

In observe, although, the idea is each difficult and dangerous.

So as to implement it, surveillance and fighter jets should be deployed to detect, establish and, if needed, shoot down all those that violate the phrases.

In 1991 the US, the UK, and France launched a no-fly zone in northern Iraq to forestall Iraqi atrocities in opposition to the ethnic Kurdish minority residing within the area, with a separate zone to guard cowl for Shiite Muslims within the south.

Advertisement

For ten years, till the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the US and its allies flew greater than 280,000 sorties, in line with the Pentagon.

No-fly zones had been arrange in 1993 by NATO in the course of the Bosnian struggle, the alliance’s first engagement in an armed battle. In 2011, they had been used in the course of the Libyan Civil Conflict, paving the best way for insurgent forces to overthrow the federal government of Muammar Gaddafi.

Now, as Russia, undeterred by worldwide sanctions, continues its incursion by land, sea and air, Zelenskyy is doubling down on his calls for that the alliance imposes a no-fly zone over Ukraine.

“We repeat each day: shut the sky over Ukraine,” Zelenskyy stated.

“In case you don’t, if you happen to don’t give us at the very least planes so we are able to defend ourselves, there’s just one factor to conclude: you need us to be killed very slowly.”

Advertisement

So why do not they?

Slippery slope

Opposite to Iraq, Bosnia, and Libya, a no-fly zone in Ukraine would pit NATO in opposition to a nuclear energy, Russia, with the second strongest military on this planet – one thing that leaders clearly need to keep away from.

“I imagine that each one encouragements for NATO to become involved within the army battle now are irresponsible,” stated Lithuanian Prime Minister Ingrida Simonyte.

In Brussels, NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg underlines this purple line every time a journalist brings it up.

“We perceive the desperation, but when we did that, we’d find yourself with one thing that would result in a full-fledged struggle in Europe involving far more international locations and far more struggling,” he stated final week..

Advertisement

Implementing Zelenskyy’s request would require member states to deploy their fighter jets inside Ukraine’s airspace to trace down and ward off Russian forces. The surveillance operations must be fixed and systemic, stretching over an unlimited floor of 603 km².

Western international locations would even be compelled to assault Moscow’s ground-based air defence programs to guard their very own planes from being shot down. This might pose important challenges for the alliance since a few of these programs could be stationed exterior Ukraine, forcing NATO to strike Russian or Belarusian territory to ensure air supremacy.

This situation would in all chance result in the open and direct confrontation that allies are so eager on avoiding and probably set off NATO’s Article 5 of collective defence.

Fears of a devastating nuclear struggle would go from far-fetched to believable in a single day.

“We aren’t a part of this battle. And we’ve a accountability to make sure it doesn’t escalate and unfold past Ukraine,” Stoltenberg stated.

Advertisement

In Moscow, Putin has already warned a no-fly zone by any third-party could be seen as “participation within the armed battle,” though he additionally stated the hard-hitting sanctions imposed by the West, which goal the whole lot from the Russian Central Financial institution to high-tech items, are akin to a declaration of struggle.

The alliance’s hands-on participation would give Putin a straightforward excuse to reframe the invasion of Ukraine as a survival struggle in opposition to NATO’s encroachment, additional galvanising his fellow residents in favour of the army marketing campaign.

However in Kyiv, Zelenskyy rebuffs all issues and what-if predictions and continues to make the case for the closing of Ukrainian skies to “all Russian missiles” and “Russian army plane.” In a scathing response to Stoltenberg, the Ukrainian president went so far as placing the blame of civilian casualties on the West.

“All of the individuals who die from this present day ahead may also die due to you, due to your weak spot, due to your lack of unity,” the president stated.

‘Window of alternative’

As the talk between capitals rages on, so does the struggle.

Advertisement

In two weeks for the reason that invasion started, the United Nations has recorded over 1,300 civilian casualties contained in the nation, with nearly 500 folks killed. (Numbers are onerous to account for given the acute circumstances on the bottom.)

“A lot of the civilian casualties recorded had been precipitated by way of explosive weapons with a large influence space, together with shelling from heavy artillery and multi-launch rocket programs, and missile and airstrikes,” the UN says, noting the actual figures are “significantly larger.”

It is unclear how a lot of this destruction has been inflicted by Russian plane in comparison with the bottom and naval forces.

Whereas Moscow has deployed warplanes and Kalibr cruise missiles to hit Ukrainian services, it has additionally despatched in 1000’s of tanks, artillery and army autos to conduct main rocket and artillery bombardments, hitting residential buildings and killing scores of civilians throughout the nation.

In flip, Ukraine has attacked the invading military utilizing anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles supplied in report time by america and NATO. Kyiv’s fierce resistance has managed to decelerate the progress of Russia’s invasion, setting the stage for a chronic and bloody battle.

Advertisement

“Because the struggle will get extra merciless and it turns into clear it won’t be over tomorrow, the humanitarian prices will probably be larger, larger and better,” says Bruno Lété, a senior fellow on the German Marshall Fund of america.

“The query for NATO will probably be whether or not to face by and watch or act.”

The violence has precipitated the best human exodus for the reason that finish of World Conflict II. Over two million Ukrainian have fled the nation in lower than two weeks and entered neighbouring states, in line with the United Nations. The European Union has activated a never-used-before legislation to host the refugees.

The quickly deteriorating state of affairs, says Lété, gives a “window of alternative” for NATO to determine a no-fly zone over the western a part of Ukraine, which Russian forces haven’t but reached, and thus create a humanitarian hall that may permit the orderly and protected exit of residents.

“It is doable proper now, with low threat. We see that Russian forces are at the moment concentred in Japanese Ukraine and round Kyiv,” Lété tells Euronews, admitting he just lately modified his thoughts over NATO’s purple line.

Advertisement

“Given the very sluggish progress of the struggle, I do not suppose Russia proper now has even the capability to forestall the implementation of a no-fly zone within the East.”

Even when the no-fly zone is geographically focused, Lété notes, the operation would nonetheless require the inexperienced mild from every NATO member state, one thing unlikely in the meanwhile given the low political urge for food for any endeavour that would threat an escalation and entail a dedication with no clear finish in sight.

Making issues tougher for the alliance, any try and impose a no-fly zone ought to, in precept, be backed by a decision of the UN Safety Council, because it was the case within the Bosnian and Libyan incursions.

As one in all its everlasting members, Russia is for certain to wield its veto energy to strike down any decision that condemns the invasion or authorises a army intervention.

Alternatively, the Ukrainian authorities might formally invite overseas forces to enter the nation because the Iraqi authorities did with the American-led coalition that was dispatched in 2014 to struggle the so-called Islamic State.

Advertisement

In view of Zelenskyy’s newest speeches, the invitation seems to be nonetheless on the desk, regardless of the West’s repeated efforts to show it down.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

YouTube to start bringing back creators banned for COVID-19 and election misinformation

Published

on

YouTube to start bringing back creators banned for COVID-19 and election misinformation

NEW YORK (AP) — YouTube will offer creators a way to rejoin the streaming platform if they were banned for violating COVID-19 and election misinformation policies that are no longer in effect, its parent company Alphabet said Tuesday.

In a letter submitted in response to subpoenas from the House Judiciary Committee, attorneys for Alphabet said the decision to bring back banned accounts reflected the company’s commitment to free speech. It said the company values conservative voices on its platform and recognizes their reach and important role in civic discourse.

“No matter the political atmosphere, YouTube will continue to enable free expression on its platform, particularly as it relates to issues subject to political debate,” the letter read.

The move is the latest in a cascade of content moderation rollbacks from tech companies, who cracked down on false information during the pandemic and after the 2020 election but have since faced pressure from President Donald Trump and other conservatives who argue they unlawfully stifled right-wing voices in the process.

It comes as tech CEOs, including Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, have sought a closer relationship with the Republican president, including through high-dollar donations to his campaign and attending events in Washington.

Advertisement

YouTube in 2023 phased out its policy to remove content that falsely claims the 2020 election, or other past U.S. presidential elections, were marred by “widespread fraud, errors or glitches.”

The platform in 2024 also retired its standalone COVID-19 content restrictions, allowing various treatments for the disease to be discussed. COVID-19 misinformation now falls under YouTube’s broader medical misinformation policy.

Among the creators who have been banned from YouTube under the now-expired policies are prominent conservative influencers, including Dan Bongino, who now serves as deputy director of the FBI. For people who make money on social media, access to monetization on YouTube can be significant, earning them large sums through ad revenue.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan and other congressional Republicans have pressured tech companies to reverse content moderation policies created under former President Joe Biden and accused Biden’s administration of unfairly wielding its power over the companies to chill lawful online speech.

In Tuesday’s letter, Alphabet’s lawyers said senior Biden administration officials “conducted repeated and sustained outreach” to coerce the company to remove pandemic-related YouTube videos that did not violate company policies.

Advertisement

“It is unacceptable and wrong when any government, including the Biden Administration, attempts to dictate how the Company moderates content, and the Company has consistently fought against those efforts on First Amendment grounds,” the letter said.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has also accused the Biden administration of pressuring employees to inappropriately censor content during the COVID-19 pandemic. Elon Musk, the owner of the social platform X, has accused the FBI of illegally coercing Twitter before his tenure to suppress a story about Hunter Biden.

The Supreme Court last year sided with former President Joe Biden’s administration in a dispute with Republican-led states over how far the federal government can go to combat controversial social media posts on topics including COVID-19 and election security.

Asked for more information about the reinstatement process, a spokesperson for YouTube did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

World

Syria’s new president takes center stage at UNGA as concerns linger over terrorist past

Published

on

Syria’s new president takes center stage at UNGA as concerns linger over terrorist past

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Once a member of al Qaeda and the Islamic State and now leading Syria’s fragile transition since toppling the Bashar Assad regime, Ahmed al-Sharaa is ready to take to the global center stage at the United Nations General Assembly Wednesday and make his case for a new path forward for his war-torn nation.

“This marks the first participation in high-level meetings of a Syrian president at the United Nations General Assembly since 1967, so this is a very big deal,” Natasha Hall, senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told Fox News Digital.

“On such a historic occasion, what he will try to emphasize and underline is that this is a new day for Syria. They have overthrown the brutal dictatorship of the Assad regime. He will talk about the progress that’s been made and what more progress needs to happen in terms of recognition and the lifting of U.N. sanctions to help Syria move forward,” Hall added.

TRUMP’S MIDDLE EAST TOUR BEGINS WITH SYRIA LOOMING AS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY

Advertisement

Interim Syria President Ahmed al-Sharaa speaks during the Concordia Annual Summit in New York, Monday, Sept. 22, 2025.  (Photo/Andres Kudacki)

A high-ranking Syrian government official confirmed to Fox News Digital that al-Sharaa will use the opportunity at the U.N. to present Syria’s vision for stability, reconstruction, and reconciliation.

“The most important issues he will raise include the need to lift all forms of unilateral sanctions that continue to hinder Syria’s recovery, the importance of combating terrorism in all its forms, the return of displaced Syrians and refugees, and the advancement of a genuinely inclusive political process rooted in the will of the Syrian people,” the Syrian official said.

Al-Sharaa, who led the Islamist rebel group Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) to victory over Assad, ditched his military fatigues for a Western-style suit and has been on a charm offensive, hosting European and Western diplomats and politicians in hopes of bringing Syria out from its international pariah status.

The new Syrian leader received an unprecedented endorsement from President Donald Trump when the two met in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in May. 

Advertisement

Trump called al-Sharaa a “young, attractive, tough guy,” announcing that the U.S. would lift sanctions in place since the Assad era and even discussed normalizing relations. 

Al-Sharaa-HTS

People welcome the leader of Syria’s Islamist Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) group that headed a lightning rebel offensive snatching Damascus from government control, Ahmed al-Sharaa (C), before his address at the capital’s landmark Umayyad Mosque on December 8, 2024. Al-Sharaa gave a speech as the crowd chanted “Allahu akbar (God is greatest),” in a video shared by the rebels on their Telegram channel showed. (Aref Tammawi/AFP via Getty Images)

Hall noted that al-Sharaa might be looking to secure a security pact between Israel and Syria along the UNGA sidelines, emphasizing that he seeks a Syria that is at peace with its neighbors and doesn’t want to position Syria to be a threat to any outside forces, particularly Israel. 

He will also be looking to secure much-needed reconstruction aid to rebuild a country ravaged by 13 years of civil war. The cost for reconstruction is estimated to be between $250 and $400 billion, and 16.7 million people, or 75% of the population, are in dire need of humanitarian assistance, according to the U.N.

Since seizing Damascus, he has publicly said all the right things. He promised an inclusive government that would represent all religious and ethnic factions in Syria, uphold women’s rights and protect minority rights.

ISLAMIST GROUP RUNNING SYRIA HAS MIXED RECORD OVER GOVERNANCE IN PROVINCE, RULED WITH ‘IRON FIST’

Advertisement

Al-Sharaa also fulfilled promises to target ISIS and other terrorist groups operating in Syria. One month after taking power, Syrian security forces seized a shipment of heavy ammunition destined for Hezbollah in Lebanon, once a key ally of the Assad regime and Iran’s Axis of Resistance.

While optimism for a new Syria remains high, some caution it’s still too soon to judge al-Sharaa as a Western ally given his terrorist past.

“Al-Sharaa is not a democrat. He ruled Idlib without power-sharing. So far, in terms of control of vital government functions like security, foreign affairs, intelligence and justice, he has put loyalists in place,” former U.S. Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford told Fox News Digital.

Ford, who was the last U.S. ambassador in Damascus in 2011, said the crucial question is whether, over time, individual political and civil liberties will be respected and that people maintain, as they have now, the freedom to organize and protest.

Rubio meets Al-Sharaa

Secretary of State Marco Rubio shakes hands with Syrian interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa at the Lotte New York Palace Hotel, on the sidelines of the 80th United Nations General Assembly at the United Nations headquarters, Monday, Sept. 22, 2025. (Bing Guan/Pool Photo via AP)

“Al-Sharaa’s heavy hand ruling Idlib prior to Assad’s fall has been lighter in Damascus, Aleppo and elsewhere. But so far, there is more political freedom to speak and protest in Syria than in many other countries in the region, such as Egypt, Algeria and some Gulf states,” Ford added.

Advertisement

Ambassador Barbara Leaf, who served as assistant secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, visited Damascus and met with Shara in December, becoming the highest-ranking official to meet with Syrian leadership since the outbreak of the Syrian civil war in 2011. 

Leaf, a distinguished diplomatic fellow with the Middle East Institute, told Fox News Digital about her initial contact with Shara right after HTS overthrew Assad. Her mission was to get eyes on him, to assess him and to send a clear signal on U.S. expectations if he was going to lead a new Syria.

“My takeaway from the meeting was that he came across as somebody who was very well-prepared for the discussion. He had clearly anticipated all of the topics that I raised and he had pretty thoughtful responses with a readiness to engage,” she said.

Syrian security forces walk together along a street, after clashes between Syrian government troops and local Druze fighters resumed in the southern Druze city of Sweida early on Wednesday, collapsing a ceasefire announced just hours earlier that aimed to put an end to days of deadly sectarian bloodshed, in Sweida, Syria, July 16, 2025. 

Syrian security forces walk together along a street, after clashes between Syrian government troops and local Druze fighters resumed in the southern Druze city of Sweida early on Wednesday, collapsing a ceasefire announced just hours earlier that aimed to put an end to days of deadly sectarian bloodshed, in Sweida, Syria, July 16, 2025.  (Karam al-Masri/Reuters)

Al-Sharaa made a point several times to say that Syria would no longer be a threat or a staging point for threats against its neighbors, including Israel, and that he would not allow the Iranians, Hezbollah or Palestinian groups, to use Syrian territory to conduct terrorist activities, the ambassador said.

“I came to the sense that he was already making a shift from being a military commander to being a politician, to being a political leader,” Ambassador Leaf noted.

Advertisement

While Ambassador Leaf highlighted his pragmatism, his true intentions as the new leader of Syria remain murky.

The ambassador said that it appears al-Sharaa has traveled a trajectory away from his jihadist terrorist past, but it remains a question how far he is willing to go to effectuate what she believes is an intention to form an Islamist style of governance.

CHRISTIAN WATCH GROUP RISES UP TO PROTECT COMMUNITY AMID GROWING VIOLENCE IN SYRIA

“Does he want to formulate a kind of Islamist governance, conservative governance and social order that, frankly, Syria has not seen? And would he be willing to use force to get there? That’s an unknown,” the ambassador cautioned.

What’s concerning for Ambassador Leaf and others is that many of the people serving in key roles in the transitional government are close associates of al-Sharaa and others affiliated with HTS and other allied armed rebel groups. 

Advertisement

“Al-Sharaa is still engaged in a careful balancing act within his own government between liberal opposition voices, former regime bureaucrats and more Islamist proponents aligned still with HTS’ mission and principles,” Caroline Rose, director of The New Lines Institute, told Fox News Digital.

Al-Sharaa in Syria

Ahmed al-Sharaa, once known by his nom de guerre Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, is seen in Syria Feb. 7, 2023. Since becoming the country’s president, he has gone back to his given name. (Omar Haj Kadour/AFP via Getty Images)

EVANGELICAL LEADER SAYS US MUST PROTECT SYRIAN CHRISTIANS FROM ATTACKS BY JIHADI TERRORISTS

Rose, who traveled to Syria earlier this year, said that Syria’s complex political dynamics have led not only to gridlock, but even incapacity in times of crisis, “such as failure to rein in radical Sunni fighters during violent outbreaks in Latakia and Suwayda, but also policies appeasing more conservative elements of al-Sharaa’s support network, such as the ruling requiring full-body swimwear at Syrian pools and beaches.”

While Syria’s new government has looked to consolidate control over a restive society, Shara’s forces had to manage a fragile society divided along ethnic and religious lines.

Syria has experienced a wave of sectarian violence since the revolution to overthrow Assad. Government security forces retaliated after forces loyal to the Assad regime launched an attack in the coastal city of Latakia, Assad’s hometown. In total, around 1,400 people, mostly civilians, were massacred, according to the U.N. Most of the victims from the Alawites, a minority group in Syria, which the Assad family belonged to, as well as from the Druze community.

Advertisement

It was the worst episode of violence since the overthrow of Assad in December 2024.

ISIS attack on church

In this photo released by the Syrian official news agency SANA, a Civil Defense worker inspects the damage inside Mar Elias church where a suicide bomber detonated himself in Dweil’a on the outskirts of Damascus, Syria, Sunday, June 22, 2025. (SANA via AP)

Clashes between Bedouin tribes, Druze militias and government forces in Suweida led to hundreds of deaths and drew in Israeli military intervention — to protect Syria’s Druze minority. A ceasefire was eventually agreed to but the spiraling ethnic violence highlights Syria’s rocky transition. 

The country’s dwindling Christian community has also felt the brunt of extremist violence. In June, the Islamic State was suspected of carrying out a deadly suicide bombing at a Greek Orthodox church in Syria, which killed 22 worshipers and injured 63 others. Christians have also been attacked and, in some cases, killed, allegedly by forces tied to the al-Sharaa government. 

The new authorities will also have to incorporate Kurdish forces operating in Northeast Syria, where the Syrian Democratic Forces have been crucial to the U.S.-led counter-ISIS campaign. Any disruptions in the merging of the SDF into the Syrian state raises the risk of an ISIS resurgence.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

World

Palestine as a state – what would that actually look like?

Published

on

For a Palestinian state to be internationally recognised and built, Israel’s current government would need to halt its relentless opposition to Palestinian statehood and Israel’s main ally, the United States, would need to agree on a two-state solution, which it no longer does.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending