Connect with us

World

Ukrainian forces advance in south after Russia announces retreat

Published

on

Ukrainian forces advance in south after Russia announces retreat
  • Kyiv: Russia might flip Kherson into “metropolis of dying”
  • Russian officers acknowledge powerful resolution
  • Retreat leaves Moscow with few positive aspects from invasion

FRONTLINE NORTH OF KHERSON, Nov 10 (Reuters) – Ukrainian troops superior within the south on Thursday after Moscow ordered one of many struggle’s largest retreats, although Kyiv remained publicly cautious, warning that fleeing Russians might flip Kherson right into a “metropolis of dying”.

Ukraine’s military chief Valeriy Zaluzhnyi mentioned Kyiv couldn’t but affirm whether or not Russia was certainly pulling out, however that Ukrainian troops had superior 7 km (4 miles) prior to now 24 hours and recaptured 12 settlements.

“We proceed to conduct the offensive operation according to our plan,” he wrote in a publish on Telegram.

A small group of Ukrainian troopers was proven on Ukraine’s state TV within the centre of the village of Snihurivka round 55 km north of Kherson metropolis. They had been greeted by dozens of residents in a sq., with a Ukrainian flag fluttering from a pole behind them. Reuters verified the situation of the video.

“At present, on Nov. 10, 2022, Snihurivka was liberated by the forces of the 131st Separate Intelligence Battalion. Glory to Ukraine!” a commander declared because the locals applauded, cheered and filmed the troopers on their telephones.

Petro Lupan, a Ukrainian volunteer distributing bread to residents alongside a close-by stretch of the entrance line north of Kherson, advised Reuters he had simply realized of the recapture of Snihurivka from a good friend reached by cellphone there.

Advertisement

“I can not discover phrases to explain my emotions,” the 46-year-old mentioned.

‘NO GIFTS’

Moscow ordered its troops on Wednesday to withdraw from the whole Russian-held pocket on the west financial institution of the Dnipro River, together with Kherson metropolis, the one regional capital Russia had captured in 9 months of struggle.

Ukrainian officers have up to now principally been cautious in public, warning that Russians should still be planning to sow destruction on their manner out.

Mykhail Podolyak, an adviser to President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, mentioned on Thursday Russia needed to show Kherson right into a “metropolis of dying”, mining the whole lot from residences to sewers and planning to shell the town from the opposite aspect of the river.

“That is what (the) ‘Russian world’ seems like: got here, robbed, celebrated, killed ‘witnesses’, left ruins and left,” he wrote on Twitter.

Advertisement

Russia denies it abuses civilians regardless of bombarding residential areas all through the battle. It has been evacuating hundreds of civilians from the Kherson space in latest weeks in what Ukraine calls a pressured deportation.

On the entrance north of Kherson there was much less artillery audible than traditional. A heavy fog had settled in in a single day, mild snow fell and the bottom was coated with frost. Ukrainian troops manning checkpoints had been buttoned up in opposition to the chilly.

Ukraine needs to inflict as a lot harm as doable on the Russian troops as they attempt to escape throughout the river, and Kyiv’s public warning might partly replicate its coverage of sustaining silence about its personal operations.

Zelenskiy himself talked about Kherson simply as soon as in his every day in a single day tv handle. Ukrainian forces had been strengthening their positions “step-by-step” within the south, he mentioned. “The enemy will make no presents to us.”

Advertisement

Requested about Kherson in an interview with CNN aired on Thursday, Zelenskiy mentioned he couldn’t give particulars, as a result of “I actually wish to have an disagreeable shock for the enemy and never one thing that they are ready for”.

‘REAL PROBLEMS’

Russia’s retreat order, simply over a month after President Vladimir Putin proclaimed the annexation of an space he mentioned can be a part of Russia without end, is among the most humiliating defeats Moscow has suffered up to now.

Russian state media and pro-Kremlin struggle hawks defended it as crucial transfer whereas acknowledging a heavy blow.

“I do know for certain that this resolution was not simple for anybody. Not for individuals who took it, nor for these of us who understood it might be so however nonetheless prayed it would not occur,” mentioned Margarita Simonyan, head of RT, Russia’s worldwide propaganda channel.

Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu was proven on TV on Wednesday giving the retreat order in response to recommendation from his prime commander who mentioned it was crucial to save lots of the lives of troops who can be higher capable of defend the Dnipro’s reverse financial institution.

Advertisement

Common Mark Milley, chairman of the U.S. joint chiefs of workers, mentioned preliminary indicators recommended Russia was following by way of with its withdrawal, although it might take time to finish. U.S. President Joe Biden mentioned the withdrawal confirmed there have been “some actual issues with the Russian army.”

Following Russian defeats in northern and jap Ukraine, the retreat leaves Moscow with solely restricted positive aspects to indicate for a “particular army operation” that made it a pariah within the West and killed tens of hundreds of its troopers.

Russian forces are nonetheless holding on to different positive aspects within the south, together with a significant land route connecting Russia to the Crimea peninsula it seized in 2014, and cities within the east that they principally obliterated whereas capturing them.

For Ukraine, which has endured 9 months of bombardment and occupation that has killed hundreds of its civilians, victory in Kherson would strengthen the case that it will possibly defeat Russia on the battlefield, and will quiet some Western voices calling for it to barter a deal that may cede territory.

“This can be a validation of Ukraine’s army technique and the strategy taken by its senior management. They’re succeeding and the Russians understand it,” tweeted Mick Ryan, a retired Australian basic.

Advertisement

“Now could be NOT the time to pressure Ukraine into negotiations. The Russians could be weakened however they aren’t giving up on their territorial aspirations. They must be crushed on the battlefield and pushed out of Ukraine.”

Reporting by Reuters bureaux; Writing by Peter Graff; Modifying by Andrew Heavens

Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Belief Rules.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Viggo Mortensen Asked Peter Jackson if He Could Use Aragorn’s Sword in a New Movie, Says He’d Star in New ‘Lord of the Rings’ Movie Only ‘If I Was Right for the Character’

Published

on

Viggo Mortensen Asked Peter Jackson if He Could Use Aragorn’s Sword in a New Movie, Says He’d Star in New ‘Lord of the Rings’ Movie Only ‘If I Was Right for the Character’

Viggo Mortensen revealed in an interview with GQ UK magazine that he used Aragorn’s iconic sword Andúril from “Lord of the Rings” in his latest movie, “The Dead Don’t Hurt.” Mortensen wrote and directed the 19th century Western, in which he stars as a Danish immigrant separated from his love (Vicky Krieps) during the Civil War.

For one fantasy sequence in the film, Mortensen asked his “Lord of the Rings” director Peter Jackson if he had his permission to use Aragorn’s sword again on screen. Mortensen played the character in Jackson’s original “Rings” trilogy and kept the sword after production wrapped.

“We had everything for this sequence with a knight. We had found this great, spirited horse, the right kind of saddle, and we made a medieval kind of blanket, and we had the costume for the knight,” Mortensen explained. “Everything was right, and then I said, well, we should have a sword. And I did look and there were some good ones and I thought, well, it might be kind of good to use [Aragorn’s sword] that I had because it’s really good. But I knew I would have to ask permission because I’m sure somebody would notice it, even if you only see it for a few seconds, it’s not really essential to the scene and certainly not to the movie, it’s just something in passing that you either see or you don’t.”

“I did ask Peter Jackson if he’d be all right with it, and he said, ‘Well, is it very important in the story?’ I said, no, it’s not, actually,” Mortensen continued. “You hardly notice it, but somebody will, probably. He said it was okay with him but that I should ask the movie company. So I contacted them and they were fine with it. They realized it wasn’t essential, it wasn’t going to draw a lot of attention to itself. And they were very nice about it, and they gave us permission. That’s why we did it, just because it seemed right. It was kind of a last-minute accident.”

Jackson is returning to Middle-Earth as the producer of a new “Lord of the Rings” movie that is going to be directed by Gollum actor Andy Serkis. The movie, “The Lord of the Rings: The Hunt for Gollum,” is being eyed for a 2026 theatrical release. Would Mortensen return as Aragorn? He doesn’t seem opposed, but the story would have to make sense.

Advertisement

“I don’t know exactly what the story is, I haven’t heard,” he said. “Maybe I’ll hear about it eventually. I like playing that character. I learned a lot playing the character. I enjoyed it a lot. I would only do it if I was right for it in terms of, you know, the age I am now and so forth. I would only do it if I was right for the character. It would be silly to do it otherwise.”

“The Dead Don’t Hurt” premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival last year. The film is opening in theaters May 31. Head over to GQ UK’s website to read Mortensen’s interview in its entirety.

Continue Reading

World

Nigeria's new anthem, written by a Briton, sparks criticism after a contentious law is passed

Published

on

Nigeria's new anthem, written by a Briton, sparks criticism after a contentious law is passed

Nigeria adopted a new national anthem on Wednesday after lawmakers passed a law that replaced the current one with a version dropped nearly a half-century ago, sparking widespread criticism about how the law was hastily passed without much public input.

President Bola Tinubu’s assent to the law comes a day after it was approved by both chambers of Nigeria’s National Assembly, which is dominated by the governing party. The federal lawmakers introduced and passed the bill in less than a week, an unusually fast process for important bills that usually take weeks or months to be considered.

MEGHAN MARKLE STIRS CONTROVERSY DURING NIGERIA TRIP BY WEARING DRESS CALLED ‘WINDSOR’

The “Arise, O Compatriots” anthem being replaced had been in use since 1978, when it was introduced by the military government. The anthem was composed at a time when the country was reeling from a deadly civil war and calls on Nigerians to “serve our fatherland with love and strength” and not to let “the labor of our heroes past (to be) in vain.”

Nigeria’s new President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, inspects honor guards after taking an oath of office at a ceremony in Abuja, Nigeria, on May 29, 2023. Nigeria adopted a new national anthem on Wednesday, May 29, 2024, after lawmakers passed a law that replaced the current one with a version dropped nearly 50 years ago, sparking widespread criticism about how the law was hastily passed without much public input. (AP Photo/Olamikan Gbemiga)

Advertisement

The new version that takes immediate effect was first introduced in 1960 when Nigeria gained independence from Britain before it was dropped by the military. Titled “Nigeria We Hail Thee,” it was written by Lillian Jean Williams, a British expatriate who was living in Nigeria at the time.

The new anthem was played publicly for the first time at a legislative session attended by Tinubu, who marked his one year in office as president on Wednesday.

Many Nigerians, however, took to social media to say they won’t be singing the new national anthem, among them Oby Ezekwesili, a former education minister and presidential aspirant who said that the new law shows that the country’s political class doesn’t care about the public interest.

“In a 21st Century Nigeria, the country’s political class found a colonial National Anthem that has pejorative words like “Native Land” and “Tribes” to be admirable enough to foist on our Citizens without their consent,” Ezekwesili posted on X.

Advertisement

Supporters of the new anthem, however, argued it was wrong for the country to have adopted an anthem introduced by the military.

“Anthems are ideological recitations that help the people to be more focused. It was a very sad development for the military to have changed the anthem,” public affairs analyst Frank Tietie said.

Continue Reading

World

Could a left-nationalist party emerge in the next EU parliament?

Published

on

Could a left-nationalist party emerge in the next EU parliament?

Radio Schuman is your new go-to podcast to spice up your weekday mornings with relevant news, insights, and behind-the-scenes stories from Brussels and beyond.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s May 30 and it’s a week to go before the European elections. Across Europe, people are bracing for a surge of support for the far-right in the European Parliament. But what of the far left? It’s a small but loud faction, drawing the support of many young voters. It’s also the only group on the left of the political spectrum that is expected to gain seats. 

We also discussed the global race for AI and the European Commission’s attempts to remain competitive. 

This podcast is also produced by the journalist Eleonora Vasques and the sound engineer Zacharia Vigneron. Music by Alexandre Jas.

Additional sources • Zacharia Vigneron

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending