Connect with us

World

No home for Russian opposition: Latvia boots exiled TV station

Published

on

No home for Russian opposition: Latvia boots exiled TV station

The gulf between Russia’s liberal opposition in exile and their hosts grew to become obvious this week, with Russia’s final remaining impartial TV channel, Dozhd (Rain), shedding its Latvian broadcasting licence after a scandal.

Final week, in a reside section masking the challenges plaguing Russia’s army mobilisation for the warfare in Ukraine, correspondent Alexey Korostelev mentioned: “We hope that we’re capable of assist many servicemen, amongst others, with tools or simply elementary facilities on the entrance.”

Professional-Ukraine observers noticed Korostelev’s remark as at finest an indication of sympathy in the direction of the invading Russian forces, and at worst, an endorsement of Moscow’s relentless offensive, which has seen hundreds killed in virtually 10 months of the warfare.

Rain promptly fired the reporter in query inside hours of the incident; Korostelev apologised and tried to make clear his remarks. However the injury was finished.

Latvian officers reacted swiftly, with Defence Minister Artis Pabriks calling for Rain to be expelled.

Advertisement

The channel was positioned beneath investigation by the safety companies.

Individually, Rain was fined 10,000 euros ($10,500) for utilizing a map through which the Crimean peninsula, annexed from Ukraine in 2014, was proven as Russian territory.

A Ukrainian nationwide flag is seen outdoors the TV 3 Studio, the place the Russian Dozhd tv channel was primarily based, in Riga, Latvia on September 8, 2022 (Gints Ivuskans/AFP]

Latvia granted Rain a broadcasting licence in June, after a Russian crackdown on the media and harsh restrictions made their work unattainable.

On Tuesday, the Nationwide Digital Mass Media Council (NEPLP) revoked Rain’s broadcasting licence on the grounds of nationwide safety and public order. Rain has till Thursday to stop transmission.

Rain Editor-in-Chief Tikhon Dzyadko referred to as the choice “undoubtedly absurd and divorced from frequent sense”.

Advertisement

“I’ve learn in books that the West upholds the fitting to a good listening to and that the accused occasion has the fitting to current their arguments in defence,” Dzyadko mentioned in a press release.

“Did TV Rain have that chance? No, it didn’t. TV Rain was not invited to the Nationwide Digital Media Council’s 30-minute session. Because of that 30-minute assembly, a 14-page ruling appeared. We are able to solely envy the exceptional pace with which these revered members of this honourable council can write.”

“What Alexey Korostelev mentioned on air doesn’t mirror the community’s place. It’s not true, and Alexey Korostelev was held accountable in the one approach doable: his employment with the tv community was terminated.”

Dzyadko addressed one other alleged violation of broadcasting guidelines when Rain correspondents referred to Russian forces as “our” military.

Advertisement

Whereas Rain was primarily based in Latvia, the authorities thought-about it a Latvian channel, not Russian.

“Individuals can debate the flagged violation within the phrase ‘our military’ when addressing a Russian viewers. Our military is committing warfare crimes – not the military of Alpha Centauri, however ours (we, the residents of the Russian Federation) is committing warfare crimes. Based on Ukrainian officers, 40,000 warfare crimes since February 24. The place’s the glorification right here?”

In Moscow, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov joined within the spat, saying: “It appears to some individuals on a regular basis that different locations are higher than residence, and it appears to some individuals on a regular basis that different locations have freedom, and there’s no freedom at residence

“This is among the vibrant examples that demonstrates the fallacy of such illusions.”

Others within the pro-Moscow camp took pictures at their opponents.

Advertisement

“Humiliated, weak, in a overseas land, the place they’re despised by each their very own and others,” wrote journalist Abbas Djuma on Telegram. “In an try to earn a penny, they pour s**t on Russia, one another, and even on their very own mom.”

Journalist and deputy chairman of Moscow’s metropolis parliament Andrey Medvedev questioned why Rain would select to arrange residence in a nation that “honours SS legionnaires, or decides to not enable in Russians with a Schengen visa, or cancels these visas to Russians on the border”.

“After which our depressing opposition wonders why its individuals think about them an enemy,” he informed his Telegram readers.

In Latvia and the opposite Baltic nations, help for Ukraine runs deep, as does the reminiscence of the Soviet occupation after World Struggle II, and suspicion of their very own ethnic Russian minorities.

“Latvia was occupied by Russia and hundreds of Latvians have been killed beneath the Soviet regime,” Olevs Nikers, the president of the Baltic Safety Basis, informed Al Jazeera. “A big proportion of Russian minorities in Latvia, largely as a result of Kremlin’s disinformation campaigns, are nonetheless disloyal to the Latvian state.”

Advertisement

One of many fiercest anti-Russia voices has been Latvian theatre director Alvis Hermanis, who has been calling for Rain’s expulsion from the nation since August, accusing the liberal Russian opposition of harbouring the identical mindset as the federal government in Moscow.

“The incident with TV Rain proved to be a second of reality for the complete Russian opposition,” Hermanis wrote on Fb.

“Now in three days we obtained to think about what the long run Russia could be like with out Putin if it was led by the present opposition,” he continued.

“And this additionally contains what could be their perspective in the direction of Latvia, which has the identical inhabitants as in a single Moscow micro-district … For now, there are only a few Russian oppositionists who perceive that not solely Putin’s regime, but additionally the imperial consciousness of the Russian man have to be modified.”

Advertisement

Russian liberal politician Lev Schlossberg, an outspoken critic of the warfare in Ukraine, referred to as the choice to cancel Rain’s licence a populist response to appease radical nationalists.

“It’s a need to rule a rustic leaning on the facility of hate, and that’s very harmful,” he wrote on Fb.

“Essentially the most disagreeable penalties might be for Latvia itself, which after 30 years of independence, has not discovered a steady steadiness of peaceable coexistence between individuals of various nationalities.”

Dzyadko promised that Rain would maintain broadcasting on YouTube, the place it has greater than 3.7 million subscribers.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

TVLine Items: My Life With the Walter Boys Adds 5, Carrie Underwood Concert Special and More

Published

on

TVLine Items: My Life With the Walter Boys Adds 5, Carrie Underwood Concert Special and More


‘My Life With the Walter Boys’ Season 2 Cast Adds 5 Actors



Advertisement





















Advertisement






Advertisement

Advertisement

ad



Advertisement






Advertisement


Quantcast



Continue Reading

World

Putin signs revised doctrine lowering threshold for nuclear response if Russia is attacked

Published

on

Putin signs revised doctrine lowering threshold for nuclear response if Russia is attacked

Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a revised nuclear doctrine on Tuesday stating that any attack on Russia supported by a country with nuclear power could be grounds for a nuclear response.

Putin signed the new policy on the 1,000th day of the war with Ukraine and the day after President Biden authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied longer-range missiles to strike inside Russia.

The doctrine also states that Russia could respond to aggression against its ally Belarus with nuclear weapons, The Associated Press reported.

Though the doctrine doesn’t specify that Russia will definitely respond to such attacks with nuclear weapons, it does mention the “uncertainty of scale, time and place of possible use of nuclear deterrent” as key principles of deterrence.

BIDEN AUTHORIZES UKRAINE TO USE US LONG-RANGE MISSILES TO STRIKE INSIDE RUSSIA

Advertisement

Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a revised doctrine stating that an attack on Russia supported by a country with nuclear power could potentially trigger a nuclear response during a Nov. 18 meeting at the Kremlin in Moscow. (Vyacheslav Prokofyev, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)

When asked if the updated doctrine comes in response to Biden’s decision to ease restrictions on how Ukraine can strike Russia, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told the AP that the doctrine was published “in a timely manner.” 

Peskov also said Putin told the government to update it earlier this year so that it’s “in line with the current situation” – the Russian president led a meeting in September to discuss these proposed revisions to the doctrine.

Joe Biden with his arm around Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelenskiy

The Kremlin said the revision was published “in a timely manner” when asked if it was done in response to President Biden authorizing Ukraine to use U.S. long-range missiles in Russia. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque )

TRUMP ALLIES WARN BIDEN RISKING ‘WORLD WAR III’ BY AUTHORIZING LONG-RANGE MISSILES FOR UKRAINE

Revealed in September, the doctrine now officially states that an attack on Russia by a nonnuclear power with the “participation or support of a nuclear power” will be seen as a “joint attack on the Russian Federation.”

Advertisement
Russian intercontinental ballistic missile

A Yars intercontinental ballistic missile is test-fired from the Plesetsk launchpad in northwestern Russia in October 2024. (Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP)

It also contains a broader range of conditions that would trigger the use of nuclear weapons, noting that they could be used in response to an air attack involving ballistic and cruise missiles, aircraft, drones and other flying vehicles.

The previous document threatened the use of Russia’s arsenal if “reliable information is received about the launch of ballistic missiles targeting the territory of Russia or its allies.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Damage to underwater cables was 'sabotage', German minister says

Published

on

Damage to underwater cables was 'sabotage', German minister says

Two underwater fibre-optic communications cables running between Finland and Germany were discovered cut on Monday, an incident both countries said was under investigation.

ADVERTISEMENT

German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius has said that damage done to two underwater data transmission cables running between Germany and Finland was deliberate.

“No one believes that these cables were accidentally cut,” Pistorius said in remarks made on the sidelines of a meeting of EU defence ministers in Brussels.

“We also have to assume, without knowing it yet, that it is sabotage,” he declared, adding that neither Germany nor Finland yet knows who was responsible for damage.

Germany and Finland announced on Monday that they had discovered a severed fibre-optic undersea data cable between the two countries, and that an investigation into the incident is underway.

In a joint statement, they said they did not know who was responsible for the damage, but that the incident came at a time when “our European security is not only under threat from Russia‘s war of aggression against Ukraine, but also from hybrid warfare by malicious actors”.

Advertisement

Pistorius also pointed to so-called “hybrid actors” as being potentially responsible for the damage.

“We have to state, without knowing specifically who it came from, that it is a ‘hybrid’ action” Pistorius said — implying that Russia, often considered responsible for acts of “hybrid warfare”, could be at least in part to blame for the incident.

Both Germany and Finland said that it was important that “critical infrastructure” such as data cables can be safeguarded.

“The fact that such an incident immediately raises suspicions of intentional damage speaks volumes about the volatility of our times,” the two countries said in their joint statement.

Finnish state-controlled data services provider Cinia said the damage to the data cable, which runs almost 1,2000 kilometres from the Finnish capital Helsinki to the German port of Rostock, was detected on Monday.

Advertisement

The incident is not the first to involve damage to underwater infrastructure in the Baltic Sea. On Sunday morning, a 218-kilometre internet link running between Lithuania and Swedish island of Gotland also lost service, according to a Swedish telecommunications company.

In 2022, Nord Stream gas pipelines under the Baltic Sea exploded, leading to several conspiracy theories around who could be responsible for the attack. Unconfirmed rumours have variously said that the US, Ukraine and Russia could have all played a role.

Continue Reading

Trending