World
Myanmar leader shops for support, weapons in Moscow
With each regimes more and more remoted on the world stage, Myanmar’s high common has been in Moscow to satisfy senior officers from Russia’s defence ministry, pledging deeper navy ties and cooperation on nuclear vitality.
“They frankly exchanged views on additional promotion of present pleasant relations and military-technological cooperation,” Myanmar state media reported, following a gathering between Senior Normal Min Aung Hlaing and Russian defence minister Sergei Shoigu.
Russia has emerged as one of the necessary backers of Myanmar’s navy, which seized energy in a coup in February 2021, regardless of a 2020 election victory by Aung San Suu Kyi’s Nationwide League for Democracy. The brand new regime has little worldwide legitimacy and has struggled to regulate a rustic that erupted first in mass protests after which armed resistance towards its rule.
Even Russia has averted giving formal recognition to the navy as the federal government of Myanmar, agreeing to permit the ambassador appointed by the overthrown authorities to maintain his seat on the United Nations. And whereas Min Aung Hlaing has made a number of journeys to Russia because the coup, he has not been granted a much-coveted viewers with President Vladimir Putin.
However whilst many Western nations have imposed sanctions on the navy, its leaders and enterprise pursuits, Russia and China have continued arming the regime, even because it turns its weapons by itself civilians, killing greater than 2,000 individuals in lower than 18 months.
“The Putin regime is aiding and abetting the Myanmar navy’s struggle crimes and crimes towards humanity, which it’s committing every day with whole impunity,” mentioned Khin Ohmar, chairperson of human rights organisation Progressive Voice.
Probably the most essential items of help has been to the regime’s air pressure, whose commander can also be a part of the delegation in Russia. The navy is going through fierce resistance from newly shaped anti-coup armed teams, often called the Folks’s Defence Forces (PDF), in addition to extra established ethnic armed organisations, which have fought for political autonomy for many years.
Whereas these allied teams have shocked many analysts with their battlefield victories because the coup, none has warplanes, so the navy’s air dominance provides it a definite benefit.
Anthony Davis, a Bangkok-based safety analyst, says the “navy’s present counterinsurgency marketing campaign depends critically on Russian and Soviet-era air frames” for assaults, provide strains, evacuations and troop transport.
“With no dependable provide of spare elements, air-launched munitions not produced in-country, and a few coaching help, the air pressure would quickly be in deep trouble,” he added.
Civilians pressured out
The UN says some 700,000 individuals have been pressured from their houses on account of the preventing because the coup, with Min Aung Hlaing vowing to “annihilate” the navy’s opponents.
Earlier this month, native media outlet The Irrawaddy reported that two of six promised Russian Su-30 fighter jets arrived secretly in Myanmar in March.
On Thursday, Radio Free Asia reported that navy helicopters opened fireplace in Tabayin township in Sagaing area, a PDF stronghold, forcing 4,000 civilians to flee from 15 villages.
In a current report, Amnesty Worldwide mentioned it documented eight air strikes concentrating on villages and a camp for internally displaced individuals between January and March of this 12 months in Kayah and Karen states, the place outstanding ethnic armed teams function.
“In virtually all documented assaults, solely civilians seem to have been current,” the report mentioned.
Amnesty says the navy has used Russian MiG-29s and Yak-130s, and Chinese language F-7s and Ok-8s.
“Indiscriminate air strikes are a key tactic of the illegitimate junta, because it wages a nationwide marketing campaign of terror. The junta makes use of Russian fighter jets and helicopter gunships to assault the individuals of Myanmar and raze complete communities,” mentioned Ohmar, accusing Russia of profiteering from atrocities.
Davis says Russia “has been the primary beneficiary” of the navy’s efforts to keep away from over-reliance on China “significantly by way of gross sales of navy aviation”. He mentioned this sample of diversification started greater than a decade in the past.
“For the reason that coup, perennial suspicions over rising Chinese language ambitions in Myanmar within the higher echelons of a now embattled navy have solely gone to underscore the advantages, political, navy and financial, of a better relationship with Russia,” he mentioned.
The Myanmar navy additionally brought on a stir by claiming Min Aung Hlaing mentioned the “peaceable use of nuclear vitality” throughout a gathering on his journey with Rosatom, Russia’s state-run nuclear vitality company, which additionally oversees nuclear weapons.
However Guillaume de Langre, a Myanmar vitality professional and former authorities adviser, dismisses talks of nuclear vitality as unrealistic.
“Myanmar doesn’t have a single nuclear scientist. So, both Russia is keen to construct and function energy crops and the complete provide chain, from gas to waste, or Myanmar has to spend the following decade coaching nuclear scientists,” he mentioned.
De Langre additionally argues the coup “put the ability sector on a freeway to chapter” and the navy regime “doesn’t have a lot credibility as a purchaser or as guarantor of the safety of infrastructure tasks”.
ASEAN defence assembly
Min Aung Hlaing’s week-long go to – state media reported he returned to Yangon on Saturday evening – comes at a time when the navy finds itself more and more remoted, and with Russia going through a global backlash over its February 24 invasion of Ukraine.
The Myanmar navy regime, recognized formally because the State Administration Council (SAC), on Wednesday expelled the UK’s high diplomat after he refused to current credentials to Min Aung Hlaing and sought to downgrade his standing from ambassador to cost d’affaires advert interim.
The UK’s defence attaché for Myanmar tweeted that the regime was shifting “additional into the diplomatic wilderness”.
1/2 My time in Myanmar involves an abrupt finish at this time. Unhappy & sorry to have been pressured by the junta to depart however glad we didn’t cave to strain to legitimise their brutal coup #WhatsHappeningInMyanmar
— Pete Vowles (@PeteVowles) July 13, 2022
Even the Affiliation of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), lengthy recognized for its coverage of not interfering in inner affairs, has given the SAC the chilly shoulder, refusing to permit Min Aung Hlaing or his overseas minister to attend high-level summits after the regime’s failure to make progress on a collectively agreed five-point plan to deal with the disaster.
However some want to see extra motion, together with the exclusion of the regime’s defence minister, who has been allowed to proceed attending ASEAN gatherings.
This month’s ASEAN counterterrorism assembly is to be co-hosted by Russia and Myanmar and can begin in Moscow on July 20.
“It’s absurd that ASEAN is permitting the aggressor Russia and the terrorist Myanmar navy to co-chair a counterterrorism assembly, which is able to solely gas their deplorable acts of terror,” Ohmar mentioned, urging democratic nations to boycott the occasion.
Australia and New Zealand have already pulled out of the assembly, however Japan, South Korea and the US haven’t but made their choices public, regardless of all three imposing sanctions on Moscow.
Myanmar’s navy is prone to politicise the assembly.
Throughout a earlier digital assembly in December, the navy included a session accusing its political opponents of “terrorism”, in accordance with emails from Australia’s Division of Defence, which have been obtained in a freedom of data request by campaigning group Justice for Myanmar.
“I urge their governments to … withdraw from that assembly and all future conferences with the Myanmar navy junta,” Ohmar mentioned.
South Korea on Wednesday admitted for the first time that in its rush to send children to American and European homes decades ago, its adoption agencies committed widespread malpractices, including falsifying documents, to make them more adoptable.
The findings by South Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, a government agency, which said children were sent away “like luggage” for profit decades ago, were a hard-won victory for South Korean adoptees abroad. Many adoptees have returned to their birth country in recent years, campaigning tirelessly for South Korea to come to terms with one of the most shameful legacies of its modern history.
Adoption agencies falsified documents to present babies as orphans when they had known parents, the commission acknowledged. When some babies died before they were flown overseas, other babies were sent in their names. The heads of four private adoption agencies were given the power to become legal guardians for the children, signing them away for overseas adoption.
The commission’s report was the government’s first official admission of problems with the country’s adoption practices, including the lack of oversight, even though such malpractice had been exposed in the past. The agency recommended that the state apologize for violating the rights of South Korean adoptees.
South Korea is the source of the world’s largest diaspora of intercountry adoptees, with around 200,000 South Korean children sent abroad since the end of the Korean War in 1953, mostly to the United States and Europe.
In its destitute postwar decades, South Korea promoted overseas adoptions to find homes for orphaned, abandoned or disabled children abroad rather than build a welfare system for them at home. The government left it to the adoption agencies to find and ship children abroad for fees from adoptive families.
“Numerous legal and policy shortcomings emerged,” said Sun-young Park, the chairwoman of the commission. “These violations should never have occurred.”
The findings carry repercussions beyond South Korea, as several receiving countries — including Norway and Denmark — have opened investigations into their international adoptions. The United States, which has received more children from South Korea than any other country, has not done so.
“This is a moment we have fought to achieve: the commission’s decision acknowledges what we adoptees have known for so long — that the deceit, fraud, and issues within the Korean adoption process cannot remain hidden,” said Peter Moller, a South Korean adoptee from Denmark who led an international campaign for the commission to launch an investigation.
The commission identified many cases where the identities and family information of children were “lost, falsified or fabricated” and where children were sent abroad without legal consent.
It cited the case of a baby girl it identified only by her last name, Chang, who was born in Seoul in 1974. Her adoption agency in Seoul knew her mother’s identity. But in the documents it sent to her adoptive family in Denmark, the agency said the girl came from an orphanage.
That agency, Korea Social Service, charged a $1,500 adoption fee, as well as a $400 donation, per child from adoptive families in 1988, the commission said. (South Korea’s per-capita national income that year was $4,571.) Some of these funds were in turn used to secure more children, turning intercountry adoptions into “a profit-driven industry,” the commission said.
South Korea’s export of babies peaked in the 1980s, with as many as 8,837 children shipped abroad in 1985. Children were “sent abroad like luggage,” the commission said, presenting a photo that showed rows of infants and young children strapped to airplane seats.
“While this is not news to us adoptees, it is a significant victory in the sense that we are finally receiving acknowledgment of what has happened to us over the years,” said Anja Pedersen, who was sent to Denmark in 1976 under the name of another girl, who had died while waiting for adoption.
The truth commission does not have the power to prosecute any of the adoption agencies, but the government is required by law to follow its recommendations.
The adoption agencies did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Since the commission launched its investigation in late 2022, some 367 overseas adoptees have asked it to investigate their cases, a majority of them from Denmark. On Wednesday, the commission recognized 56 of them as victims of human rights violations. It was still investigating the other cases.
Mia Lee Sorensen, a South Korean adoptee who was sent to Denmark in 1987, said the commission’s findings provided the “validation” that she had been seeking. When she found her birth parents in South Korea in 2022, they couldn’t believe she was alive. They told her that her mother had passed out during labor and that when she woke up, the clinic told her that the baby had died.
Those whose cases weren’t recognized among the victims on Wednesday expressed hope that the commission would be extended to carry out more investigations.
Mary Bowers, who was adopted by a family in Colorado in 1982, was still waiting for answers to many inconsistencies in her adoption papers.
“This is only the beginning,” Ms. Bowers said.
Houthi militants in Yemen are claiming responsibility for recent attacks against U.S. warships in the Red Sea.
The terror group claimed in a statement published by the Jerusalem Post Tuesday that they had attacked the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier and several U.S. warships in the Red Sea.
Early on Wednesday, the Houthis said they had targeted a U.S. vessel and Israeli military locations using drones.
Fox News Digital has reached out to the Department of Defense for comment.
TRUMP’S SIGHTS SET ON IRAN AFTER US AIRSTRIKES DECIMATE MORE THAN 30 HOUTHI TARGETS
The Houthis in Yemen claimed responsibility for alleged recent attacks against U.S. warships. (Gerard Bottino/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
The Houthis had claimed earlier this month that they had attacked the Truman and its warship in response to U.S. attacks on Yemen, but offered no evidence to support their claim of retaliation.
The U.S. military had shot down several Houthi drones a short time before the group’s claim.
This comes after several Trump administration officials discussed plans for a forthcoming military strike against the Houthis in a group chat on the encrypted messaging service Signal in which they mistakenly added Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, who said he received a request to join the group on March 11 from what appeared to be the president’s National Security Advisor Michael Waltz.
The group, called “Houthi PC Small Group,” featured top Trump officials discussing what turned out to be an upcoming attack on the Houthis, as many are criticizing the group chat as a massive breach of national security and note that senior officials are not supposed to discuss detailed military plans outside special secure facilities or protected government communications networks.
TRUMP OFFICIALS ACCIDENTALLY TEXT ATLANTIC JOURNALIST ABOUT MILITARY STRIKES IN APPARENT SECURITY BREACH
The Houthis claimed they had attacked the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier and several U.S. warships in the Red Sea. (Gerard Bottino/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Goldberg reported that 18 people were listed in the group, including Waltz, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles.
The article noted that officials were discussing “war plans,” and Goldberg said he elected not to publish some of the highly sensitive information he saw in the Signal chat, including precise information about weapons packages, targets and timing, because of potential threats to national security and military operations.
The editor also said that Ratcliffe put the name of a CIA undercover agent into the Signal chat.
The Houthis said they had targeted a U.S. vessel and Israeli military locations using drones. (AP)
The White House has confirmed that the group chat “appears to be authentic,” although administration officials, including Hegseth, have sought to downplay concerns and discredit Goldberg as a reporter.
“I’ve heard how it was characterized. Nobody was texting war plans, and that’s all I have to say about that,” Hegseth said Monday.
Hegseth criticized Goldberg as “a deceitful and highly discredited, so-called journalist who’s made a profession of peddling hoaxes time and time again, to include the, I don’t know, the hoaxes of Russia, Russia, Russia, or the fine people on both sides hoax or suckers and losers hoax. So this guy is garbage.”
The claims appear to have sprung from reports that the Nordic countries have started advising citizens to keep a supply of cash at home in the case of a digital banking crisis.
A false narrative spreading online claims that Norway and Sweden are doing away with e-money and are returning to a fully cash-based society.
For example, one post circulating on social media says the countries are now going back to paying in cash because they’ve supposedly realised that it’s the most secure payment method, as digital accounts allow the authorities to block your transactions.
Another popular post says that Sweden is going back to cash because digital payments are potentially a threat to national security.
However, these claims aren’t accurate.
They appear to have their origins in news reports over the past few months that both countries are putting the brakes on their plans to become cashless societies, apparently over fears that fully digital payment systems could leave their financial and state institutions vulnerable to Russian cyber attacks.
For example, The Guardian recently reported that despite the Nordic countries’ ambitions to reduce their reliance on cash, they are now starting to see electronic banking as a potential threat to national security.
An image or link to this report is often shared by social media users alongside a claim that the countries are getting rid of e-money altogether.
As things stand, Norway and Sweden have the lowest amount of cash in circulation as a percentage of GDP in the world, according to recent figures from Sveriges Riksbank, the central bank in Stockholm.
Fellow Nordic country Denmark also ranks quite low, as does the UK, while the eurozone as a whole still has significantly more cash in circulation.
But now, Sweden is encouraging citizens to use cash regularly through a variety of different measures.
Over the past few months, the defence ministry released a brochure entitled “If Crisis of War Comes” in which it advised people to keep a week’s supply of cash at home to remain prepared.
Sveriges Riksbank also said that the country needs to make sure that no one is excluded and that everyone is able to pay in the event of a large-scale crisis or war.
Norway meanwhile recently brought in legislation that fines retailers if they don’t accept cash, and also advised people to keep some cash on hand in case digital payment systems are attacked.
Nevertheless, Sveriges Riksbank told EuroVerify it’s not abandoning digital payments, and that it’s continuing with its plans to bring in an “e-krona” — a digital version of Sweden’s national currency.
Norges Bank, Norway’s central lender, also fully denied the claims that the country wants to move away from an electronic payment system and back to cash.
ADVERTISEMENT“Increased use of electronic payment methods has brought great benefits to society as a whole, banks, and their customers,” a spokesperson for the central bank said. “However, there is still a need for cash. Cash is not an end in itself, but has properties and functions that other payment methods and instruments do not have, and which are important to ensure an efficient and secure payment system.”
There’s no evidence that either country is trying to phase out e-money and return to a 100% cash-based society.
The misleading narrative online appears to feed into fears of digital currencies, in particular the digital euro envisaged by the European Central Bank (ECB).
Opponents of the digital euro say it could damage privacy, financial control and security, and even fully supplant cash.
ADVERTISEMENTFor example, they say that every transaction could be monitored by central authorities, leading to financial surveillance, and that the government would have more control over the currency, opening up the possibility of currency manipulation.
It’s also been suggested that the elderly or those in rural areas could lose out, as they wouldn’t have the same access to digital services as those in more urban areas.
However, the ECB and its president, Christine Lagarde, have repeatedly said that a digital euro would complement cash, not replace it, and that it would be safe, make payments more efficient, and be easy for all to use.
“The use of cash to make payments is declining and the shift towards online shopping and digital payments is accelerating,” the ECB says. “The digital euro would be an electronic form of cash for the digitalised world. It would give consumers the option to use central bank money in a digital format, complementing banknotes and coins.”
ADVERTISEMENT“Like cash, the digital euro would be risk-free, widely accessible, user-friendly and free for basic use,” it continues. “Moreover, the digital euro would strengthen the strategic autonomy and monetary sovereignty of the euro area by boosting the efficiency of the European payments ecosystem as a whole, fostering innovation and increasing its resilience to potential cyberattacks or technical disruptions, such as power outages.”
Rhoden vetoes ‘misguided’ petition bill, signs off on tougher South Dakota residency law
How new Nissan Stadium energy system could elevate Tennessee Titans, fan experiences
Texas teenagers tried to kill mother for turning off Wi-Fi: Police
From ‘Galaxy Quest’ to ‘Thelma & Louise,’ new ‘Utah Film Trail’ takes you where famous movies were made in the state – The Times-Independent
Theater Review: Eboni Booth's 'Primary Trust,' Vermont Stage | Seven Days
-
News1 week agoVance to Lead G.O.P. Fund-Raising, an Apparent First for a Vice President
-
News1 week agoTrump Administration Ends Tracking of Kidnapped Ukrainian Children in Russia
-
Technology1 week agoThe head of a Biden program that could help rural broadband has left
-
Business1 week agoEgg Prices Have Dropped, Though You May Not Have Noticed
-
Technology1 week agoDude Perfect and Mark Rober may be the next YouTubers to get big streaming deals
-
World7 days agoCommission warns Alphabet and Apple they're breaking EU digital rules
-
News7 days agoTrump’s Ending of Hunter Biden’s Security Detail Raises Questions About Who Gets Protection
-
News1 week agoU.S. to Withdraw From Group Investigating Responsibility for Ukraine Invasion