World
Is the Stormont Brake an ‘unequivocal veto’ on EU law, as London says?

The European Union and the UK have ushered in a brand new chapter of their lengthy, wealthy and typically fraught relationship.
These precise phrases – “new chapter” – have been intentionally emphasised by each European Fee President Ursula von der Leyen and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak once they met on Monday to current the Windsor Framework.
“The brand new Windsor Framework respects and protects our respective markets and our respective reputable pursuits,” von der Leyen mentioned, in a visibly upbeat temper.
The framework has been hailed as a set of “joint options” to deal with the complicated regulatory state of affairs in Northern Eire, a area with a historical past of bloody sectarian violence that, for the reason that 2016 referendum, has been awkwardly caught between UK and EU laws.
To be able to preserve an invisible Irish border and forestall a resurgence of civil unrest, Brussels and London negotiated an ad-hoc protocol that has stored Northern Eire below EU guidelines for customs, Worth Added Tax (VAT), excise duties, subsidies and commerce for items.
Since its signing in 2019, the protocol has been the topic of intense criticism from the Unionist Motion in Northern Eire and the Conservative Occasion in Westminster, who argued the provisions erected a synthetic border within the Irish Sea and infringed upon British sovereignty.
The 2022 election to the Northern Eire Meeting, generally known as Stormont, delivered a transparent pro-protocol majority and introduced the power-sharing government to a standstill, additional aggravating the disaster.
An distinctive brake
Aware of this persistent friction, Brussels and London have now give you a brand new modern mechanism – dubbed the Stormont Brake – to provide the folks of Northern Eire a better say on how the principles work in apply.
Underneath the earlier guidelines, any adjustments to EU regulation – both the passing of an modification or a model new textual content – that also utilized to Northern Eire needed to mechanically enter into drive throughout the territory.
Now, below the Windsor Framework, the brake will enable the 90-seat Stormont meeting to boost objections if it thinks these adjustments to EU regulation have a big and lasting impression on the on a regular basis lives of Northern Eire residents.
The petition must be signed by a minimal of 30 Stormont legislators from at the least two totally different political events, and must lay out strong arguments to show the damaging impression is “liable to persist,” the British authorities has mentioned.
However in contrast to conventional petitions of concern, the enchantment is not going to require a cross-community vote within the Stormont meeting, which signifies that both unionists or nationalists might collect the mandatory signatures to launch the method on their very own.
“The Brake is not going to be obtainable for trivial causes,” London has warned.
In Brussels, the European Fee insists the device might be an choice of final resort, solely meant for the “most distinctive circumstances” the place all different mediation efforts have been exhausted.
As soon as Stormont drafts and indicators the petition, London might be entitled to set off the brake and droop the appliance of the amended EU regulation in Northern Eire, with quick impact.
After that, EU and UK officers will meet of their joint committee to debate the authorized dispute and the way the brake can have an effect on the protocol and the invisibility of the Irish border. If no answer is discovered then, the 2 events will take their dispute to unbiased arbitration.
That panel, appointed by either side, might be tasked with ruling if the activation of the brake met the mandatory situations or was unjustified. At this final stage, two situations are potential:
- The panel guidelines the brake didn’t have advantage, resulting in its de-activation. The modified or new EU regulation will then apply to Northern Eire, in line with the protocol.
- The panel guidelines the brake had advantage, permitting the suspension of the modified or new EU regulation. This example will create a regulatory divergence, even when restricted, between Northern Eire and the Republic of Eire. The EU will then be anticipated to take particular “remedial measures” to deal with the brand new state of affairs.
An unequivocal veto?
Though Brussels and London each agree on the emergency nature of the Stormont Brake, warning towards it being exploited, there’s a putting disagreement on the ability the mechanism carries.
The brake “would give the UK an unequivocal veto – enabling the (EU) rule to be completely disapplied – inside the Joint Committee,” the British authorities has mentioned.
The phrase “veto” was additionally utilized by Prime Minister Sunak throughout Monday’s joint press convention with President von der Leyen and later repeated on his Twitter account.
Neither von der Leyen nor senior European officers have employed the time period, which is politically charged and could be seen as an admission of the EU’s lack of management. The phrase is equally absent from any official doc launched by the European Fee.
“Nouns or adjectives which might be used to explain it additional are a matter for either side,” a European Fee spokesperson mentioned when requested in regards to the semantic divergence.
For David Henig, the UK director on the European Centre for Worldwide Political Financial system (ECIPE), the brake is being “oversold” by Sunak and his conservative authorities, the place the hard-line Brexiteer wing nonetheless holds necessary sway.
“The UK can determine to not implement EU regulation, however then each events have to debate options, and the EU can take measures if there isn’t any settlement,” Henig advised Euronews.
Christy Petit, an European regulation professor at Dublin Metropolis College, agrees, noting the brake is proscribed by the situation to show a “vital” impression on the lives of Northern Irish folks.
“Although the brake might be activated upon a unilateral choice from the UK facet, this can’t be totally unequivocal because the EU can at all times retaliate, and there’s a procedural safeguard to verify (the UK) has acted in good religion and in accordance with the Windsor Framework,” Petit advised Euronews.
In a stunning concession, Brussels accepted to exclude the European Courtroom of Justice (ECJ) from the Stormont Brake, which is able to now be within the palms of the unbiased arbitration panel. The omission of ECJ oversight, a degree of friction throughout negotiations, was brazenly celebrated by London.
In Brussels, senior officers careworn the arbitration panel will solely be requested to rule on the situations to set off the brake – a procedural matter – somewhat than on the substance of European regulation itself, the place the ECJ will stay the “sole and supreme arbiter.”
Federico Fabbrini, a visiting regulation professor at Princeton College, says the Windsor Framework doesn’t diminish the ECJ as a result of its function stays “entrenched” within the unique protocol and the arbitration panel will look at new adjustments to EU regulation – not the present laws in its entirety.
“The events have dedicated to peaceable decision of controversies and to using arbitration, which was at all times potential in line with the protocol,” Fabbrini advised Euronews.
“So there isn’t a change there.”

World
Commissioner Hansen presents plan to cut farming bureaucracy in EU

European Commissioner for Agriculture Christophe Hansen presented his simplification plan for the agricultural sector during a meeting organised by Euronews.
The European Commission unveiled the plan, which aims to simplify the European Union’s agricultural rulebook, on Wednesday in Brussels.
The measures are designed to reduce what the Commission sees as unnecessary administrative burdens in implementing the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), the EU’s farming subsidy framework.
Hansen believes the proposed strategy should serve all stakeholders. The plan, therefore, aims to reduce the administrative burden for farmers and member states.
“What is felt to be an administrative burden on the farm is not only the CAP (Common Agricultural Policy), but also environmental legislation, health legislation, and often national or regional legislation, so I think that everyone must contribute to reducing this bureaucracy,” Hansen explained.
This simplification plan could potentially save farmers up to €1.58 billion a year and the national authorities €210 million. The package of measures is aimed in particular at organic farming and small farms, which play an essential role in rural areas’ economic activity.
The plan proposes exemptions from environmental rules, also known as conditionalities. Hansen points out that this package aims not to reform the sector, but to adjust certain rules.
For example, Hansen said, “If grassland remains in place for more than five years, it becomes permanent grassland. This is a devaluation of this farmland because it can no longer be used as arable land. After four years or so, farmers plough to preserve this status.”
“For me, it’s more valuable if the grass stays for seven years rather than five. So this is environmental progress. It’s the applicability (of the rules) that changes,” he added.
Flexibility and financial support
The European Commission also wants to help small farmers obtain financial aid and make their farms more competitive. The institution is considering an offer of up to €50,000.
Hansensuggested digitalising the sector, mentioning, for example, a digital portfolio to facilitate checks.
“I, as a farm, have my digital wallet and if the water authority needs to know something about my land, they can turn to that wallet,” Hansen explained.
Hansen further reiterated his desire to make the profession attractive again and to help professionals.
“It’s very important that we reduce the stress on our farmers, because at the moment it all depends on the Member State. They have to deal with five, six, seven controls a year, which causes enormous stress for our farmers,” Hansen insisted.
“That’s why we also want to reduce these controls, and the member states are also obliged to act. We want to reduce the number of checks to just one a year,” he added.
Environmental NGOs believe that the plan threatens the agricultural sector’s green objectives. Hansen, however, rejects this criticism and emphasises that he is responding to the concerns of farmers, who have repeatedly protested against overly restrictive European regulations.
Yet, this simplification plan is only the first step. The European Commission intends to present new measures later this year.
World
Gazans Once Escaped To Rafah. Now Israel Is Razing It.

Last year, a million Palestinians fled to Rafah, the southernmost city in the Gaza Strip, to escape the brunt of Israel’s bombardment in its war against Hamas. When Israeli forces later invaded Rafah itself, they flattened areas along the border with Egypt, but many neighborhoods were largely spared the worst of the war.
That is no longer the case.
The Israeli military has destroyed extensive parts of Rafah since it ended a cease-fire in March after talks with Hamas collapsed. In early May, after much of the destruction was already complete, Israel announced it would soon launch an “intensive” escalation of its campaign in Gaza. Over the previous two nights, strikes have killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza, Palestinian officials said. On Tuesday, the Israeli military targeted Muhammad Sinwar, a top Hamas leader in Gaza, near a hospital in Khan Younis.
Satellite images analyzed by The New York Times show that the Israeli military has flattened large areas in and around the city of Rafah and built new military infrastructure in the last two months.
Israeli leaders say capturing more territory inside Gaza will pressure Hamas to surrender and release the remaining hostages that the group has held since it led a deadly attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Israel’s defense minister vowed that Israeli forces would “clear out” the areas and “prevent any threat,” including in Rafah.
Israeli security officials have previously said that tunnels between Egypt and Gaza have allowed Hamas to stock up on weaponry and other supplies.
In response to a question from The Times about the Israeli military’s operations in Rafah, the military said that it was part of an effort to secure operational control and conduct counterterrorism operations.
“We will replicate the model implemented in Rafah in other areas of the Strip as well,” said Effie Defrin, the Israeli military spokesperson, in a press briefing last week.
Demolishing Block by Block
Here is what the operation looks like on the ground: Four excavators could be seen in a video verified by The Times tearing down a row of buildings in Rafah’s Shaboura neighborhood in April. The video, first shared on an Israeli Telegram channel, was taken from an armored vehicle.
Satellite imagery shows that hundreds of buildings were destroyed in this neighborhood during the month of April, including on the block where the video was filmed.
Earlier this month, the Israeli security cabinet approved a new plan to call up tens of thousands of additional soldiers, to seize and hold territory in the embattled enclave, and to forcibly displace Palestinians to the south. But the satellite imagery shows the areas of the south where buildings are still standing are getting smaller and smaller.
Another video shows four buildings destroyed in a controlled demolition. The video, uploaded on an Israeli soldier’s Instagram account and shared by the Palestinian journalist Younis Tirawi on his X account, was filmed in northern Rafah, where much of the destruction has taken place. Satellite image shows that the demolition took place sometime in April.
New Construction
Israeli forces are not just clearing land. They are building on it.
One new road already stretches more than three miles from the Israeli border across Rafah into agricultural areas. It is protected by berms, trenches and several military outposts.
And other construction is moving at a rapid clip, the satellite images show.
Several new military outposts, often graded, paved and surrounded by defensive walls, have been built across southern Gaza in the past month. Soldiers have also commandeered buildings to use as bases, such as an under-construction hospital.
Israel calls the road it has constructed from the Israeli border the “Morag Corridor,” which Mr. Netanyahu said last month was intended to cut Rafah off from the rest of the enclave. The name is a reference to a Jewish settlement that existed in the area until Israel withdrew its soldiers and civilians from Gaza two decades ago.
What the construction might mean for the long term is uncertain. Some Israeli officials have agitated for Israel to rebuild Jewish settlements in the enclave, but Mr. Netanyahu has rebuffed the prospect for now.
Mr. Netanyahu said last week, after much of the construction and razing in Rafah was already in progress, that Israel was “on the eve of a forceful entry to Gaza.”
World
Rubio doubts 'anything productive' will happen in Ukraine peace talks without Trump, Putin

Secretary of State Macro Rubio cast a pessimistic tone ahead of talks in Turkey now set for Friday after both Russian President Vladimir Putin and President Donald Trump said they would not be in attendance.
The peace talks, which were supposed to happen on Thursday, got thrown into disarray after both Russian and Ukrainian delegations, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, landed in various cities in Turkey as confirmation arrived that not only would Putin not be engaging in the discussions, but neither would senior members from the Kremlin.
According to reports, frustration grew as the delegations and mediators spent much of the day questioning when, and even whether, they would meet on Thursday before the meeting was ultimately pushed to Friday.
President Donald Trump speaks to reporters aboard Air Force One en route from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to Doha, Qatar, Wednesday, May 14, 2025. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
TRUMP TO SKIP RUSSIA-UKRAINE PEACE TALKS, CALLS ZELENSKYY THE ‘GREATEST SALESMAN, MAYBE IN HISTORY’
“Frankly, at this point, I think it’s abundantly clear that the only way we’re going to have a breakthrough here is between President Trump and President Putin,” Rubio told reporters. “It’s going to require that level of engagement to have a breakthrough in this matter.
“I don’t think anything productive is actually going to happen from this point forward… until they engage in a very frank and direct conversation, which I know President Trump is willing to do,” he added.
The peace talks first came about after Putin suggested last week that Ukraine and Russia should engage in direct talks. Zelenskyy agreed and said those talks should be held by the leaders of the warring nations.
Trump sparked surprise earlier this week when he suggested he might travel to Turkey from the UAE if progress was made in the talks on Thursday, but it was never previously suggested that the U.S. president, who was set to be wrapping up a Middle East tour, would be present for the negotiations.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan welcomes Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the Presidential Complex in Ankara, Turkey, on May 15, 2025. (Turkish Presidency/Murat Kula/Handout/Anadolu via Getty Images)
PUTIN PROPOSES DIRECT PEACE TALKS WITH UKRAINE TO END WAR
The Kremlin on Thursday confirmed Putin was not going to participate in the peace talks.
Aboard Air Force One on Thursday, Trump suggested Putin did not attend because of a scheduling miscommunication and told reporters that there was no hope on any real progress in negotiations until he and Putin speak.
“Look, nothing’s going to happen until Putin and I get together. OK?” Trump said. “He was going to go, but he thought I was going to go. He wasn’t going if I wasn’t there.
“I don’t believe anything’s going to happen, whether you like it or not, until he and I get together,” he added.
Any future plans for Trump and Putin to talk remain unknown.
“What I can say with certainty is that the president’s… willing to stick with [this] as long as it takes to achieve peace,” Rubio said. “What we cannot do, however, is continue to fly all over the world and engage in meetings that are not going to be productive.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio speaks to the media following a meeting of NATO foreign ministers in Antalya, on May 15, 2025, ahead of potential peace talks between Ukraine and Russia in Turkey. (Umit Bektas/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)
“The only way we’re going to have a breakthrough here is with President Trump sitting face to face with President Putin and determining once and for all whether there’s a path to peace,” he added.
Zelenskyy did not hold back in expressing his frustration over what he said is proof that Putin’s “attitude is unserious.”
“No time of the meeting, no agenda, no high-level of delegation – this is personal disrespect to Erdoğan, to Trump,” Zelenskyy reportedly said at a Thursday news conference after meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.
-
Austin, TX6 days ago
Best Austin Salads – 15 Food Places For Good Greens!
-
Technology1 week ago
Netflix is removing Black Mirror: Bandersnatch
-
World1 week ago
The Take: Can India and Pakistan avoid a fourth war over Kashmir?
-
Health1 week ago
N.I.H. Bans New Funding From U.S. Scientists to Partners Abroad
-
News1 week ago
Reincarnated by A.I., Arizona Man Forgives His Killer at Sentencing
-
News1 week ago
Jefferson Griffin Concedes Defeat in N.C. Supreme Court Race
-
News1 week ago
Who is the new Pope Leo XIV and what are his views?
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Fight or Flight (2025) – Movie Review