World
House GOP kicks off majority with vote to slash IRS funding
WASHINGTON (AP) — Home Republicans started their tenure within the majority Monday by passing a invoice that will rescind almost $71 billion that Congress had offered the IRS, fulfilling a marketing campaign promise regardless that the laws is unlikely to advance additional.
Democrats had beefed up the IRS over the following decade to assist offset the price of high well being and environmental priorities they handed final yr and to replenish an company struggling to supply fundamental providers to taxpayers and guarantee equity in tax compliance.
The cash is on high of what Congress supplies the IRS yearly via the appropriations course of and instantly grew to become a magnet for GOP marketing campaign advertisements within the fall claiming that the enhance would result in a military of IRS brokers harassing hard-working Individuals.
The invoice to rescind the cash handed the Home on a party-line vote of 221-210. The Democratic-controlled Senate has vowed to disregard it.
Shortly earlier than the vote, the nonpartisan Congressional Finances Workplace projected that rescinding the additional IRS funding would enhance deficits over the approaching decade by greater than $114 billion. That created an ungainly second for Republicans, who’ve been saying that addressing deficits could be one in every of their high considerations within the majority. It supplied an early instance of how the GOP’s daring guarantees on the marketing campaign path may get tangled within the messy actuality of governing.
Nonetheless, the CBO’s projection didn’t seem to dampen Republican help. Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., mentioned the additional IRS funding Democrats offered final yr was for one goal.
“To go after small companies, hard-working Individuals to attempt to elevate cash for reckless spending, reckless spending that has triggered $31 trillion in debt on this nation,” Duncan mentioned.
Duncan and different GOP lawmakers routinely say the additional funding shall be used to rent 87,000 new brokers to focus on Individuals, however that’s deceptive. The quantity relies on a Treasury Division plan saying that many IRS staff could be employed over the following decade if it obtained the cash. However these staff won’t all be employed on the similar time, they won’t all be auditors and plenty of shall be changing some 50,000 staff who’re anticipated to give up or retire in coming years.
“This debate about IRS lends itself to be probably the most dishonest, demagogic rhetoric that I’ve seen within the Congress at any cut-off date,” mentioned Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md.
Charles Rettig, the previous commissioner of the IRS, mentioned in a closing message to the company in November that the extra cash would assist in many areas, not simply beefing up tax enforcement. He mentioned the investments would make it “even much less possible for trustworthy taxpayers to listen to from the IRS or obtain an audit letter.”
Extra funding for the company has been politically controversial since 2013, when the IRS underneath the Obama administration was discovered to have used inappropriate standards to evaluation tea celebration teams and different organizations making use of for tax-exempt standing.
Within the ensuing years, the IRS was totally on the shedding finish of congressional funding fights, at the same time as a subsequent 2017 report discovered that each conservative and liberal teams have been chosen for scrutiny.
In April, Rettig informed lawmakers the company’s finances has decreased by greater than 15% over the previous decade when accounting for inflation and mentioned the variety of full-time staff — 79,000 within the final fiscal yr — was near 1974 ranges.
However Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., and different Republicans weren’t shopping for the argument that the funding could be centered on auditing the rich.
“That is meant to nickel-and-dime, audit and harass America’s small companies and households, who they know can not afford the authorized charges to battle this military,” Malliotakis mentioned.
Sen. Ron Wyden, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, mentioned a decade of Republican-led finances cuts gutted the IRS.
“The one method that Home Republicans may make it any extra apparent that they’re doing a favor for rich tax cheats is by popping out and saying it in precisely these phrases,” Wyden mentioned. “This invoice goes nowhere within the Senate.”
And the White Home mentioned President Joe Biden would veto the invoice if it will get to his desk, saying that the wealthiest 1% of Individuals disguise about 20% of their revenue in order that they don’t need to pay taxes on it, shifting extra of the tax burden to the center class.
“With their first financial laws of the brand new Congress, Home Republicans are making clear that their high financial precedence is to permit the wealthy and multibillion-dollar firms to skip out on their taxes, whereas making life tougher for extraordinary, middle-class households that pay the taxes they owe,” the White Home mentioned.
World
Chrystia Freeland, Justin Trudeau’s ‘Minister of Everything,’ Enters Race to Replace Him
Chrystia Freeland, Canada’s former deputy prime minister, whose sudden resignation in December helped set the stage for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s decision to step down, said on Friday that she was running to replace him.
She posted her announcement on X with a six-word sentence: “I’m running to fight for Canada.”
Ms. Freeland, 56, once a close ally of Mr. Trudeau who was often called his “minister of everything,” had served as deputy prime minister since 2019, and had long been viewed as a possible successor.
But the two had a bitter rift when Mr. Trudeau moved to demote her over a Zoom call in December, offering her a minister-without-portfolio role. Instead, she opted to resign and delivered a strong rebuke of Mr. Trudeau’s leadership as Canada prepares to deal with President-elect Donald J. Trump. Mr. Trump has threatened to apply a tariff on Canadian exports to the United States.
Her stinging departure destabilized Mr. Trudeau’s shaky grip on power. Three weeks later, on Jan. 6, he announced he would step down as Liberal Party leader and as prime minister once a new leader was in place.
Candidates for the leadership post will campaign ahead of a national vote among party members in March. The new Liberal Party leader will also become Prime Minister of Canada and lead the party in a general election expected to take place in the spring.
Ms. Freeland said she would officially launch her campaign in person on Sunday, which could take place in Toronto, the electoral district she represents in Parliament. She will face a stiff challenge persuading Canadians that she is the candidate best suited to take on the Conservative Party and its leader, Pierre Poilievre.
The Conservatives, who have a 25 percentage point lead over the Liberals in polls, have sought to portray Ms. Freeland as part of the problem given her once-close relationship with Mr. Trudeau and her key role in his governments since 2015, when he first became prime minister.
Mr. Trudeau’s popularity has nose dived in recent years as Canadians have become increasingly frustrated with persistently high cost-of-living on everything from housing to grocery bills.
Many Canadians have also started pushing back against the government’s immigration policy, which has resulted in 2.3 million people arriving in the country in the past two years. While the government said migrants were necessary to help fill gaps in low-skilled jobs, many Canadians say the new arrivals have contributed to rising housing costs and strains on the public health care system.
Ms. Freeland had accused Mr. Trudeau of engaging in political gimmickry after her ministry clashed with his office about a temporary sales-tax break during the end-of-year holidays.
The government estimated that the tax break, which covered items like restaurant bills and some toys and clothing, would cost about 1.6 billion Canadian dollars, or $1.1 billion, which Ms. Freeland said that Canada could “ill afford” at a time when Mr. Trump is raising the specter of tariffs.
“We need to take that threat extremely seriously,” Ms. Freeland said in her resignation letter. “That means keeping our fiscal powder dry today, so we have the reserves we may need for a coming tariff war.”
Ms. Freeland was born and raised in Alberta and is of Ukrainian ancestry. She has been a staunch supporter of Ukraine on the global stage, denouncing Russia’s invasion.
She attended Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar, and worked as a journalist and newsroom leader at a number of news organizations, including the Financial Times and Reuters, before joining the Liberal Party in 2013. She is married to a reporter on the Culture desk of The New York Times and has three children.
During Mr. Trump’s first term, Ms. Freeland steered Canada’s renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement with the United States and Mexico, portraying steely confidence during the tense talks with the odd moment of levity. (Ms. Freeland was photographed arriving in Washington in 2018 wearing a white T-shirt that read “Keep Calm and Negotiate NAFTA.”)
But she also angered Mr. Trump during the negotiations and his animosity has apparently not waned.
When Ms. Freeland resigned in December, Mr. Trump posted triumphantly: “Her behavior was totally toxic, and not at all conducive to making deals which are good for the very unhappy citizens of Canada. She will not be missed!!!”
Ms. Freeland, in an opinion piece published on Friday, hinted that Canada would retaliate in “the single largest trade blow the U.S. economy has ever endured.”
As finance minister, she spearheaded popular government programs to reduce the cost of day care for parents and to tackle childhood poverty.
Her announcement on Friday marks the second entry of a top contender in the Liberal Party leadership race. She will face off against Mark Carney, a former head of the central banks in Canada and England, who declared he was running on Thursday.
Mr. Carney is close friends with Ms. Freeland and is the godfather to one of her three children. He was being recruited by Mr. Trudeau’s team to take Ms. Freeland’s place in the government in December, but declined the job.
World
Pakistani court sentences ex-PM Imran Khan and his wife to 14 and 7 years in prison in graft case
A Pakistani court on Friday sentenced the country’s already-imprisoned former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife to 14 and seven years in jail after finding them guilty of corruption, officials and his lawyer said.
It’s yet another blow for the former premier who has been behind the bars since 2023.
The couple are accused of accepting a gift of land from a real estate tycoon in exchange for laundered money when Khan was in power.
Prosecutors say the businessman, Malik Riaz, was then allowed by Khan to pay fines that were imposed on him in another case from the same laundered money of 190 million British pounds ($240 million) that was returned to Pakistan by British authorities in 2022 to deposit with the national exchequer.
6 DEAD AS PROTESTS ERUPT IN PAKISTAN OVER JAILED FORMER PRIME MINISTER IMRAN KHAN
Khan has denied wrongdoing and insisted since his arrest in 2023 that all the charges against him are a plot by rivals to keep him from returning to office.
According to Khan’s legal team, Khan laughed and his wife, Bushra Bibi, smiled when judge Nasir Javed read the verdict.
Later, Khan and Bibi were taken into custody by prison officials after the announcement of the verdict, according to officials. She had earlier served a prison sentence in another graft case until she was freed on bail by a court in October. She recently led a rally to demand her husband’s release.
Later, a post from Khan’s account on the X platform urged his supporters not to panic over the verdict, under which the al-Qadir University built by his wife’s charity will also be taken over by authorities in the Punjab province.
“I will never accept this dictatorship and I will stay in the prison cell for as long as I have to in the struggle against this dictatorship, but I will not compromise on my principles and the struggle for the true freedom of the nation,” Khan wrote. Khan’s family has said such posts are shared with his consent.
Faisal Chaudhry, a defense lawyer, said the court verdict could be challenged in the superior courts.
Shortly after the announcement of the verdict, lawmakers from Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, or PTI, party rallied outside the parliament in the capital, Islamabad, saying the former premier had been wrongly punished.
INDIA STEPS UP DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS WITH THE TALIBAN AS RIVAL PAKISTAN LOSES INFLUENCE IN AFGHANISTAN
“This is a bogus case, and we will approach an appeals court against this decision,” said Omar Ayub Khan, a senior party leader who is not related to the former premier.
Imran Khan was ousted in a no-confidence vote in parliament in April 2022, had previously been convicted on charges of corruption, revealing official secrets and violating marriage laws in three separate verdicts and sentenced to 10, 14 and seven years respectively. Under Pakistani law, he is to serve the terms concurrently — meaning, the length of the longest of the sentences.
Some of Khan’s supporters were also present outside the Adiala prison in the city of Rawalpindi, and they chanted slogans against the government, demanding the release of their leader.
On Thursday, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar told reporters in Islamabad that there was “irrefutable evidence” against Khan and his wife in the “mega corruption scandal.” Tarar said that Khan even did not tell his own Cabinet members about the money that was returned to Pakistan by Britain.
Tarar also claimed that Khan built a new sprawling house in the eastern city of Lahore after giving benefits to the business tycoon, and that he was unable to prove that from where he got the money from to build it.
The latest development came a day after Khan’s PTI party held a crucial round of talks with representatives of the government of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to demand the release of all political detainees, including Khan and other party leaders.
Sharif became prime minister following the February 2024 election, which PTI claims was rigged.
World
Commission claims slashing of foreign offices still under negotiation
The European Commission said that ‘reflections are ongoing’ over the downsizing of the international hubs under the department for international partnerships.
The European Commission said that ‘reflections are ongoing’ over the downsizing of the international hubs under the department for international partnerships.
Plans to slash EU international partnerships from more than four in five hubs worldwide revealed today by Euronews remain under negotiation, a Commission spokesperson said today.
Euronews reported that Directorate-General for International Partnerships (DG INTPA) presence in 100 delegations worldwide is set for reduction to 18 hubs on the basis of an internal planning document seen by this news service.
“Reflections are ongoing within the Commission and no decision has been taken [on the issue],” European Commission spokesperson for Foreign Affairs Anitta Hipper said when asked for details of the savings and staff moves that the plans entailed, declining to comment further on the document.
Hipper insisted that the EU presence on the ground in foreign offices would be maintained, and said that work is ongoing to see how effectively delegations can deliver on all EU policies, taking into account “budget realities and political priorities”.
DG INTPA is planning slashing more than four in five of its hubs worldwide – reducing from around 100 delegations to 18 hubs – according to a document seen by Euronews.
The DG will maintain 18 hubs in Africa, Asia and Latin American/Caribbean, according to the document, in strategic areas for the institution. You can see in this map where these hub offices will be located in detail:
“It is essential to move to portfolios that are more strategic and less fragmented and an optimised resource allocation across multiple countries,” the document said.
“The current INTPA operating model is based on the de-concentration process of 25 years ago, whereby INTPA staff are distributed across ‘cooperation sections’ within 100 Delegation worldwide,” the document said, adding: “This model no longer meets the needs for increased strategic focus and operation agility.”
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
Science6 days ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
Technology1 week ago
Las Vegas police release ChatGPT logs from the suspect in the Cybertruck explosion
-
News1 week ago
Photos: Pacific Palisades Wildfire Engulfs Homes in an L.A. Neighborhood
-
Education1 week ago
Four Fraternity Members Charged After a Pledge Is Set on Fire
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump trolls Canada again, shares map with country as part of US: 'Oh Canada!'
-
Technology6 days ago
Amazon Prime will shut down its clothing try-on program
-
News1 week ago
Mapping the Damage From the Palisades Fire