Connect with us

World

Haiti crisis looms large as Biden visits Canada’s Trudeau

Published

on

Haiti crisis looms large as Biden visits Canada’s Trudeau

Montreal, Canada – For a lot of months, day by day life in Haiti’s capital has been marked by widespread violence and deepening political instability since highly effective armed gangs seized management of the streets of Port-au-Prince.

The still-unfolding disaster is predicted to determine prominently in discussions this week between Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and United States President Joe Biden, who will probably be making his first official journey to Canada since taking workplace in early 2021.

Washington has been pushing Ottawa to steer a multinational armed drive in Haiti, and Biden is predicted to hunt a solution from Trudeau on whether or not Ottawa intends to take up the mission throughout his go to to the Canadian capital on Thursday and Friday.

However specialists say Canada isn’t prepared to steer such a deployment, as an alternative supporting what it calls a “Haitian-led answer” to the nation’s political disaster whereas additionally advancing a sanctions regime and elevated help to the Haitian Nationwide Police.

Canada is “not going to get pushed – even by a really sturdy, highly effective neighbour just like the US – into doing one thing it doesn’t need to do right here”, stated Stephen Baranyi, a professor of worldwide growth on the College of Ottawa and an knowledgeable on Haiti.

Advertisement

He stated Ottawa’s technique relies on an evaluation that Trudeau and different officers have said publicly,”that previous interventions have failed, {that a} new strategy is required and on the centre of that must be a respect for and assist for this concept of Haitian-led options”.

“That’s been a smart place, however now we have to acknowledge that the dilemmas arising from that strategy have gotten sharper and sharper,” particularly because the safety scenario continues to deteriorate in Port-au-Prince, Baranyi informed Al Jazeera.

“The political course of is taking a very long time, and so many individuals are asking, ‘Effectively, till when can Haitians wait?’” he stated.

‘Specialised armed drive’

Haiti’s interim prime minister, Ariel Henry, requested the worldwide neighborhood in October to assist deploy a “specialised armed drive” to push again gangs and restore order within the nation of 11 million folks.

Advertisement

On the time, a robust gang coalition had maintained a weeks-long blockade on the principle petrol terminal in Port-au-Prince, inflicting water and electrical energy shortages, forcing the closure of well being services and severely disrupting motion within the metropolis.

Henry’s request drew assist from the US in addition to the United Nations, however it additionally set off offended protests. Some Haitians known as for the resignation of the prime minister, who has confronted a disaster of legitimacy since he took up his publish after the July 2021 killing of President Jovenel Moise.

Haitian civil society leaders additionally rejected the concept, warning {that a} historical past of international interventions and occupations, together with by the US, has proven such deployments deliver “extra issues than options”. As an alternative, they known as for out of doors forces to stem the circulate of weapons into Haiti and bolster its police drive.

Whereas the US has touted the necessity for a world drive in Haiti, it has proven no need to steer it. After the chaotic American withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, one other intervention “merely has political implications and carries baggage, if you’ll, for the White Home”, stated Georges Fauriol, a senior affiliate on the Middle for Strategic and Worldwide Research suppose tank in Washington, DC.

For Canada, “there’s a kind of reputable concern that that is doubtlessly an open-ended sort of operation,” Fauriol informed Al Jazeera. He famous that Haiti isn’t solely grappling with the surge in gang violence but additionally faces excessive unemployment, inside displacement and a well being disaster.

Advertisement

So whereas “the Haitian-led answer idea is an efficient one”, he stated, Haitians have confronted a problem in producing a consensus.

Certainly, Haiti, which is essentially with none functioning authorities establishments, is juggling competing visions for easy methods to remedy the political impasse. One is backed by Henry and the opposite by outstanding opposition figures and civil society teams.

Fauriol stated a method to assist bridge the hole in Haiti could be for Canada and the US to comply with appoint “a trusted go-between that may symbolize worldwide views with out urgent on the Haitians themselves however at the least would encourage them in direction of a workable plan”.

“Merely kicking the can down the highway isn’t going to assist,” he stated.

Advertisement

Sanctions, different measures

In Canada, as questions swirl across the prospect of sending an armed drive to Haiti forward of Biden’s arrival, Trudeau and his ministers have repeatedly strengthened their strategy to the disaster.

“Exterior intervention as we’ve carried out previously hasn’t labored to create long-term stability for Haiti,” the prime minister informed reporters in mid-March as he confused the necessity to bolster the Haitian police and different nationwide establishments.

In previous months, Ottawa has delivered safety gear to the police drive, imposed sanctions in opposition to greater than a dozen Haitian political figures and different “elites” accused of being linked to gangs and deployed a navy plane within the skies above Haiti to offer aerial surveillance and intelligence data.

The Canadian authorities additionally offered $100m Canadian ($73m) in support to Haiti final yr and has contributed $12.3m Canadian ($9m) to this point in 2023, stated Charlotte MacLeod, a spokesperson for Canada’s international affairs division.

Requested if Ottawa would lead a multinational armed drive, MacLeod informed Al Jazeera in an electronic mail: “Always, options have to be made by and for Haitians. Canada is main worldwide efforts to assist Haiti, the Haitian folks, and a Haitian-led answer to the disaster.”

Advertisement

Canada’s prime common additionally has solid doubt on the Canadian navy’s capability to steer a mission to Haiti. “My concern is simply our capability,” Chief of the Defence Workers Wayne Eyre stated in a current interview with the Reuters information company. “It might be difficult.”

Based on Fauriol, Biden’s talks with Trudeau this week are “crucial” given the deteriorating safety scenario in Haiti. “If there isn’t some kind of a breakthrough on the Ottawa assembly, whenever you take a look at the calendar, you’re not fairly certain precisely what occurs subsequent,” he stated.

Baranyi stated he believes a significant breakthrough is unlikely however that every aspect would attempt to get the opposite to maneuver nearer to its respective objectives. Which means “the Individuals will attempt to get Canada to maneuver sooner in planning for a doable multinational drive” whereas “Canada will attempt to get Washington to broaden its sanctions.”

A bridge between the 2 positions, Baranyi stated, could be to again Haitian dialogue that would result in restricted worldwide intervention – “principally policing, time-bound [with] clear guidelines of engagement” – in addition to a political transition settlement that would lay a path in direction of elections.

Advertisement

“With out a political settlement inside Haiti [that is] pretty broadly based mostly, … a world intervention won’t have home legitimacy,” the professor stated. “It additionally may not have home legitimacy in nations like Canada.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Saudi executions rose sharply in 2024

Published

on

Saudi executions rose sharply in 2024
Saudi Arabia executed 330 people this year, the highest number in decades, despite de facto ruler Mohammed bin Salman’s 2022 assertion that the death penalty had been eliminated except for murder cases under his vision for a new open kingdom.
Continue Reading

World

Israel launches strikes in Yemen on Houthi military targets, IDF says

Published

on

Israel launches strikes in Yemen on Houthi military targets, IDF says

The Israeli military claimed responsibility for a series of airstrikes in Yemen on Thursday that hit Sana’a International Airport and other targets in the Houthi-controlled capital.

The Israel Defense Forces said the strikes targeted military infrastructure used by the Houthis to conduct acts of terrorism. 

“The Houthi terrorist regime has repeatedly attacked the State of Israel and its citizens, including in UAV and surface-to-surface missile attacks on Israeli territory,” the IDF said in a statement. 

“The targets that were struck by the IDF include military infrastructure used by the Houthi terrorist regime for its military activities in both the Sana’a International Airport and the Hezyaz and Ras Kanatib power stations. In addition, the IDF struck military infrastructure in the Al-Hudaydah, Salif, and Ras Kanatib ports on the western coast.” 

PROJECTILE FROM YEMEN STRIKES NEAR TEL AVIV, INJURING MORE THAN A DOZEN: OFFICIALS

Advertisement

Black smoke rises near Sana’a International Airport in Yemen after reported Israeli airstrikes. (Reuters)

The strikes come days after Israel’s defense minister promised retaliation against Houthi leaders for missile strikes launched at Israel from Yemen.

Houthi rebels, who control most of northern Yemen, have fired upon Israel for more than a year to support Hamas terrorists at war with the Jewish State. The Houthis have attempted to enforce an embargo on Israel by launching missiles and drones at cargo vessels crossing the Red Sea – a major shipping lane for international trade. 

US NAVY SHIPS REPEL ATTACK FROM HOUTHIS IN GULF OF ADEN

Oil tanker in the Red Sea

This photo released by the European Union’s Operation Aspides naval force shows the oil tanker Sounion burning in the Red Sea following a series of attacks by Yemen’s Houthi rebels, on Saturday Sept. 14, 2024.  (European Union’s Operation Aspides via AP)

Overall, the Houthis have launched over 200 missiles and 170 drones at Israel since Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre of 1,200 people. Since then, the Houthis have also attacked more than six dozen commercial vessels – particularly in the Bab-el-Mandeb, the southern maritime gateway to Egypt’s Suez Canal.

Advertisement

On Saturday, a projectile launched into Israel from Yemen struck Tel Aviv and caused mild injuries to 16 people, Israeli officials said. The incident was a rare occasion where Israeli defense systems failed to intercept an attack.

NETANYAHU WARNS HOUTHIS AMID CALLS FOR ISREAL TO WIPE OUT TERROR LEADERSHIP AS IT DID WITH NASRALLAH, SINWAR

Israel Katz

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz looks on, amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, in Jerusalem, November 7, 2024.  (REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun)

Israel retaliated by striking multiple targets in areas of Yemen under Houthi control, including power plants in Sana’a. 

Israeli leaders have vowed to eliminate Houthi leadership if the missile and drone attacks do not cease.

On Monday, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said, “We will strike their strategic infrastructure and decapitate their leaders. Just as we did to [former Hamas chief Ismail] Haniyeh, Sinwar and Nasrallah, in Tehran, Gaza and Lebanon – we will do in Hodeidah and Sanaa.” 

Advertisement

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also urged Israelis to be “patient” and suggested that soon the military will ramp up its campaign against the Houthis.

“We will take forceful, determined and sophisticated action. Even if it takes time, the result will be the same,” he said. “Just as we have acted forcefully against the terror arms of Iran’s axis of evil, so too will we act against the Houthis.”

Fox News Digital’s Amelie Botbol contributed to this report. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Retraction of US-backed Gaza famine report draws anger, scrutiny

Published

on

Retraction of US-backed Gaza famine report draws anger, scrutiny

United States President Joe Biden’s administration is facing criticism after a US-backed report on famine in the Gaza Strip was retracted this week, drawing accusations of political interference and pro-Israel bias.

The report by the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET), which provides information about global food insecurity, had warned that a “famine scenario” was unfolding in northern Gaza during Israel’s war on the territory.

A note on the FEWS NET website, viewed by Al Jazeera on Thursday, said the group’s “December 23 Alert is under further review and is expected to be re-released with updated data and analysis in January”.

The Associated Press news agency, quoting unnamed American officials, said the US asked for the report to be retracted. FEWS NET is funded by the US Agency for International Development (USAID).

USAID did not immediately respond to Al Jazeera’s request for comment on Thursday afternoon.

Advertisement

Israel’s war in Gaza has killed more than 45,300 Palestinians since early October 2023 and plunged the coastal enclave into a dire humanitarian crisis as access to food, water, medicine and other supplies is severely curtailed.

An Israeli military offensive in the northern part of the territory has drawn particular concern in recent months with experts warning in November of a “strong likelihood” that famine was imminent in the area.

“Starvation, malnutrition, and excess mortality due to malnutrition and disease, are rapidly increasing” in northern Gaza, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification said in an alert on November 8.

“Famine thresholds may have already been crossed or else will be in the near future,” it said.

The report

The FEWS NET report dated December 23 noted that Israel has maintained a “near-total blockade of humanitarian and commercial food supplies to besieged areas” of northern Gaza for nearly 80 days.

Advertisement

That includes the Jabalia, Beit Lahiya and Beit Hanoon areas, where rights groups have estimated thousands of Palestinians are trapped.

“Based on the collapse of the food system and worsening access to water, sanitation, and health services in these areas … it is highly likely that the food consumption and acute malnutrition thresholds for Famine (IPC Phase 5) have now been surpassed in North Gaza Governorate,” the FEWS NET report had said.

The network added that without a change to Israeli policy on food supplies entering the area, it expected that two to 15 people would die per day from January to March at least, which would surpass the “famine threshold”.

The report had spurred public criticism from the US ambassador to Israel, Jack Lew, who in a statement on Tuesday said FEWS NET had relied on “outdated and inaccurate” data.

Lew disputed the number of civilians believed to be living in northern Gaza, saying the civilian population was “in the range of 7,000-15,000, not 65,000-75,000 which is the basis of this report”.

Advertisement

“At a time when inaccurate information is causing confusion and accusations, it is irresponsible to issue a report like this,” he said.

‘Bullying’

But Palestinian rights advocates condemned the ambassador’s remarks. Some accused Lew of appearing to welcome the forced displacement of Palestinians in Gaza.

“To reject a report on starvation in northern Gaza by appearing to boast about the fact that it has been successfully ethnically cleansed of its native population is just the latest example of Biden administration officials supporting, enabling and excusing Israel’s clear and open campaign of genocide in Gaza,” the Council on American-Islamic Relations said in a statement.

The group urged FEWS NET “not to submit to the bullying of genocide supporters”.

Advertisement

Huwaida Arraf, a prominent Palestinian American human rights lawyer, also criticised Lew for “relying on Israeli sources instead of your own experts”.

“Do you work for Israel or the American people, the overwhelming majority of whom disapprove of US support for this genocide?” she wrote on X.

Polls over the past year have shown a high percentage of Americans are opposed to Israel’s offensive in Gaza and want an end to the war.

A March survey by Gallup found that 55 percent of people in the US disapproved of Israel’s actions in Gaza while a more recent poll by the Pew Research Center, released in October, suggested about three in 10 Americans believed Israel’s military offensive is “going too far”.

While the Biden administration has said it is pushing for a ceasefire in Gaza, it has rebuffed calls to condition US assistance to Israel as a way to bring the war to an end.

Advertisement

Washington gives its ally at least $3.8bn in military assistance annually, and researchers at Brown University recently estimated that the Biden administration provided an additional $17.9bn to Israel since the start of the Gaza war.

The US is required under its own laws to suspend military assistance to a country if that country restricts the delivery of American-backed humanitarian aid, but Biden’s administration has so far refused to apply that rule to Israel.

“We, at this time, have not made an assessment that the Israelis are in violation of US law,” Department of State spokesperson Vedant Patel told reporters in November despite the reports of “imminent” famine in northern Gaza.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending