Connect with us

World

Five of the most viral misinformation posts since Ukraine war began

Published

on

Five of the most viral misinformation posts since Ukraine war began

As with all battle or worldwide disaster, Russia’s warfare in Ukraine has offered fertile floor for on-line misinformation to develop and unfold.

False claims had been being unfold by pro-Russian and even pro-Ukrainian accounts even earlier than Moscow launched its full-scale invasion on 24 February.

Amid an internet warfare of propaganda, each state authorities and particular person social media customers proceed to share deceptive rumours.

And the topic of misinformation has appeared to evolve over the past six months of combating. Euronews’ social media newsdesk, The Dice, takes a take a look at 5 of essentially the most viral false claims.

1. Outdated clips and the ‘Ghost of Kyiv’

Inside hours of Russia launching its invasion, deceptive movies of unrelated explosions had been watched by 1000’s of individuals.

Advertisement

Plenty of customers shortly shared footage of blasts in Tianjin, China, and Beirut, Lebanon — claiming it confirmed Russian bombs hitting “Ukrainian headquarters”.

The clips had been broadly unfold on Fb, Twitter, TikTok, and different platforms, with the dramatic — however unrelated — footage capturing customers’ consideration.

On the similar time, different social media customers started sharing unfounded people tales about Ukrainian acts of bravery.

Arguably essentially the most well-known of those issues the so-called “Ghost of Kyiv” fighter ace, who’s claimed to have single-handedly destroyed six Russian planes in a matter of hours on the very begin of the invasion.

Outdated footage from video video games or navy workouts was shared alongside the hearsay, garnering thousands and thousands of views.

Advertisement

The declare was even amplified by Ukraine’s former President Petro Poroshenko earlier than the nation’s navy confirmed in Could that the “Ghost of Kyiv” was a “superhero legend”.

Whereas uplifting tales of bravery can provide hope to residents throughout wartime, analysts say that fanatical misinformation can really be dangerous and supply an inaccurate image of the warfare. Some even counsel that deceptive, seemingly folksy tales can distract individuals from real acts of heroism.

2. Denial of warfare crimes and of any warfare in any respect

Professional-Russian customers have usually repeated the Kremlin’s unique place that the invasion of Ukraine is a “particular navy operation” to “denazify” and “demilitarise” a “Neo-Nazi state”.

Many have downplayed allegations of Russian warfare crimes and even claimed that the warfare is a supposed “hoax”.

In a single broadly shared video, a information reporter may very well be seen standing in entrance of traces of physique baggage, one in every of which was shifting.

Advertisement

Nonetheless, the footage didn’t present invented warfare casualties in Ukraine, however a “Fridays for Future” local weather change protest in Vienna in February, three weeks earlier than the invasion started.

Days later, one other viral video of a model claimed to be proof that Ukrainian authorities had “staged” the mass killing of civilians within the city of Bucha.

The deceptive clip confirmed a prosthetic doll being dressed and ready by two males. Nadezhda, an assistant director for a Russian tv programme, confirmed to Euronews that the video confirmed their movie set close to St. Petersburg and never Ukrainian navy personnel.

“The data being given [to Russian citizens] is one-sided, it has nothing to do with actuality, it’s as badly performed as any faux,” she instructed Euronews.

Different examples of Ukraine warfare misinformation have centred on “disaster actors” — people who find themselves supposedly employed to behave out the function of terrified or deceased warfare victims.

Advertisement

One false declare instructed {that a} well-known magnificence blogger had “acted” because the pregnant sufferer of a lethal assault on a maternity hospital within the metropolis of Mariupol on 9 March.

Russia has shifted its stance on the assault, accusing Ukrainian Azov nationalists of staging a “hoax” bombing at a “non-operational” hospital. Its unfounded claims had been later eliminated by each Fb and Twitter.

Moscow has regularly issued blanket denials that they’ve dedicated warfare crimes, regardless of mounting unbiased proof.

Russian diplomats and pro-Kremlin social media customers have continued to unfold unfounded claims of “hoaxes” or “disaster actors” after missile strikes on Kramatorsk, Kremenchuk, and Vinnytsia.

3. Volodymyr Zelenskyy — medicine, deepfakes and inexperienced screens

As missile strikes first hit Kyiv, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy printed a defiant video on social media, stating that he wouldn’t flee the nation.

Advertisement

His presence within the Ukrainian capital and his nightly video addresses dispelled rumours he had left.

Some customers falsely claimed that the Ukrainian president was utilizing a inexperienced display or movie studio to look as if in Kyiv when he was really hiding in exile.

Most of the images really confirmed Zelenskyy filming a hologram for numerous digital know-how conferences throughout Europe.

And because the months of warfare draw on, he has grow to be a extra frequent goal for Russian disinformation.

In March, Zelenskyy was the topic of a deepfake video, created utilizing synthetic intelligence (AI) to make it seem as if somebody stated one thing that they had not.

Advertisement

Within the edited footage, the Ukrainian president supposedly inspired his residents to “lay down arms” and give up.

Specialists instructed Euronews that the deepfake was the “first utilized in an intentional and broadly misleading method” and marked a shift in misinformation across the Ukraine warfare.

Quickly afterwards, a equally edited video of Vladimir Putin additionally appeared on-line, the place the Russian President supposedly instructed troopers to “go house when you’re alive”.

Different edited clips have additionally been shared on-line by pro-Russian supporters in an obvious effort to discredit the Ukrainian president. The claims and allegations grew to become extra various and, at occasions, more unusual.

One doctored video falsely instructed that Zelenskyy retains mounds of cocaine on his desk throughout video conferences when the unique footage on his personal Instagram confirmed his desk empty.

Advertisement

One other mistranslated interview from 2019 portrayed the Ukrainian president as a drug addict when he really acknowledged that he’s “hooked on espresso” and “doesn’t take medicine”.

For the reason that begin of the warfare, Russian state media have regularly tried to falsely paint Ukrainian leaders as “drug addicts” and “Neo-Nazis”.

4. Finland and Poland dragged into the data warfare

False claims concerning the warfare in Ukraine have unfold overseas to incorporate international international locations and the NATO navy alliance.

As combating continued into Could, social media customers falsely instructed that European Union member states had been about to have interaction within the battle.

One video — with a digitally added BBC Information brand — alleged that Poland’s navy normal had signed an order to place military sections on “full alert”.

Advertisement

The BBC later confirmed that it had produced no such story and that its branding had been used to create a faux video. Polish authorities officers additionally accused Moscow of launching info assaults in opposition to the nation.

One other deceptive video alleged that Finland was sending dozens of tanks in direction of its japanese border with Russia, escalating tensions.

The footage really confirmed a freight prepare carrying tools to western Finland for annual navy workouts.

5. Misinformation follows refugees overseas

In line with the UN, greater than 6.5 million refugees left Ukraine for the reason that warfare broke out till mid-August.

Many have moved on from instant border nations into western Europe, and on-line misinformation has adopted, attempting to discredit them.

Advertisement

A digitally edited video falsely accused Ukrainian refugees of burning down a house in Germany whereas they had been making an attempt to set hearth to a Russian flag. 

Additional investigation revealed that the footage of a home hearth dates again to 2013, a number of years earlier than the warfare in Ukraine started.

Different pro-Kremlin customers falsely claimed that German authorities had invited Ukrainian nationals to remain at a former Nazi focus camp utilizing doctored photos. The Sachsenhausen Memorial denied the rumours as “faux”.

Current misinformation has additionally tried to counsel that European nations have grow to be offended with Ukrainian refugees and their international locations’ assist for Kyiv.

Footage of motorists dragging away environmental protesters close to Rome was shared deceptive to say that Italian residents had been “drained” of “silly” Ukrainian demonstrations.

Advertisement

In the meantime, Russian state media falsely claimed that 25% of UK hosts wish to evict their Ukrainian visitors after six months. No particular ballot query was surveyed.

The false claims about Ukrainian refugees mark the newest development in on-line misinformation for the reason that warfare broke out in Ukraine.

Professional-Russian voices have tried to painting that its invasion is supported by many Ukrainians and at the moment are working to discredit these refugees who fled the warfare to hunt assist in western Europe.

Since February, the Kremlin has stepped up efforts to regulate the narrative concerning the warfare, dismissing and downplaying allegations of warfare crimes.

Kyiv has additionally been at fault for amplifying folksy tales or city myths and downplaying unfavourable media protection.

Advertisement

However the warfare in Ukraine has to date undoubtedly been a breeding floor for every type of misinformation — from photos which have merely been taken out of context to digitally edited movies that use synthetic know-how to unfold falsehoods.

Six months on, the net warfare of data is being fought out simply as fiercely because the battles on the bottom in Ukraine.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

TVLine Items: My Life With the Walter Boys Adds 5, Carrie Underwood Concert Special and More

Published

on

TVLine Items: My Life With the Walter Boys Adds 5, Carrie Underwood Concert Special and More


‘My Life With the Walter Boys’ Season 2 Cast Adds 5 Actors



Advertisement





















Advertisement






Advertisement

Advertisement

ad



Advertisement






Advertisement


Quantcast



Continue Reading

World

Putin signs revised doctrine lowering threshold for nuclear response if Russia is attacked

Published

on

Putin signs revised doctrine lowering threshold for nuclear response if Russia is attacked

Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a revised nuclear doctrine on Tuesday stating that any attack on Russia supported by a country with nuclear power could be grounds for a nuclear response.

Putin signed the new policy on the 1,000th day of the war with Ukraine and the day after President Biden authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied longer-range missiles to strike inside Russia.

The doctrine also states that Russia could respond to aggression against its ally Belarus with nuclear weapons, The Associated Press reported.

Though the doctrine doesn’t specify that Russia will definitely respond to such attacks with nuclear weapons, it does mention the “uncertainty of scale, time and place of possible use of nuclear deterrent” as key principles of deterrence.

BIDEN AUTHORIZES UKRAINE TO USE US LONG-RANGE MISSILES TO STRIKE INSIDE RUSSIA

Advertisement

Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a revised doctrine stating that an attack on Russia supported by a country with nuclear power could potentially trigger a nuclear response during a Nov. 18 meeting at the Kremlin in Moscow. (Vyacheslav Prokofyev, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)

When asked if the updated doctrine comes in response to Biden’s decision to ease restrictions on how Ukraine can strike Russia, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told the AP that the doctrine was published “in a timely manner.” 

Peskov also said Putin told the government to update it earlier this year so that it’s “in line with the current situation” – the Russian president led a meeting in September to discuss these proposed revisions to the doctrine.

Joe Biden with his arm around Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelenskiy

The Kremlin said the revision was published “in a timely manner” when asked if it was done in response to President Biden authorizing Ukraine to use U.S. long-range missiles in Russia. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque )

TRUMP ALLIES WARN BIDEN RISKING ‘WORLD WAR III’ BY AUTHORIZING LONG-RANGE MISSILES FOR UKRAINE

Revealed in September, the doctrine now officially states that an attack on Russia by a nonnuclear power with the “participation or support of a nuclear power” will be seen as a “joint attack on the Russian Federation.”

Advertisement
Russian intercontinental ballistic missile

A Yars intercontinental ballistic missile is test-fired from the Plesetsk launchpad in northwestern Russia in October 2024. (Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP)

It also contains a broader range of conditions that would trigger the use of nuclear weapons, noting that they could be used in response to an air attack involving ballistic and cruise missiles, aircraft, drones and other flying vehicles.

The previous document threatened the use of Russia’s arsenal if “reliable information is received about the launch of ballistic missiles targeting the territory of Russia or its allies.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Damage to underwater cables was 'sabotage', German minister says

Published

on

Damage to underwater cables was 'sabotage', German minister says

Two underwater fibre-optic communications cables running between Finland and Germany were discovered cut on Monday, an incident both countries said was under investigation.

ADVERTISEMENT

German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius has said that damage done to two underwater data transmission cables running between Germany and Finland was deliberate.

“No one believes that these cables were accidentally cut,” Pistorius said in remarks made on the sidelines of a meeting of EU defence ministers in Brussels.

“We also have to assume, without knowing it yet, that it is sabotage,” he declared, adding that neither Germany nor Finland yet knows who was responsible for damage.

Germany and Finland announced on Monday that they had discovered a severed fibre-optic undersea data cable between the two countries, and that an investigation into the incident is underway.

In a joint statement, they said they did not know who was responsible for the damage, but that the incident came at a time when “our European security is not only under threat from Russia‘s war of aggression against Ukraine, but also from hybrid warfare by malicious actors”.

Advertisement

Pistorius also pointed to so-called “hybrid actors” as being potentially responsible for the damage.

“We have to state, without knowing specifically who it came from, that it is a ‘hybrid’ action” Pistorius said — implying that Russia, often considered responsible for acts of “hybrid warfare”, could be at least in part to blame for the incident.

Both Germany and Finland said that it was important that “critical infrastructure” such as data cables can be safeguarded.

“The fact that such an incident immediately raises suspicions of intentional damage speaks volumes about the volatility of our times,” the two countries said in their joint statement.

Finnish state-controlled data services provider Cinia said the damage to the data cable, which runs almost 1,2000 kilometres from the Finnish capital Helsinki to the German port of Rostock, was detected on Monday.

Advertisement

The incident is not the first to involve damage to underwater infrastructure in the Baltic Sea. On Sunday morning, a 218-kilometre internet link running between Lithuania and Swedish island of Gotland also lost service, according to a Swedish telecommunications company.

In 2022, Nord Stream gas pipelines under the Baltic Sea exploded, leading to several conspiracy theories around who could be responsible for the attack. Unconfirmed rumours have variously said that the US, Ukraine and Russia could have all played a role.

Continue Reading

Trending