Connect with us

World

Amid talk of war crimes in Ukraine, there are lessons from the Balkan bloodshed.

Published

on

Amid talk of war crimes in Ukraine, there are lessons from the Balkan bloodshed.

The proof of obvious atrocities in Ukraine, with civilians executed within the suburbs of Kyiv, brings to thoughts one other European horror: the bloody Balkan wars of the Nineteen Nineties and the typically fraught, yearslong effort to deliver these accountable to justice.

In 1999, Slobodan Milosevic, the previous president of Yugoslavia and the architect of a decade of conflict that took greater than 200,000 lives and tore the nation aside, grew to become the primary sitting head of state to be charged with conflict crimes. Three years later, he grew to become the primary former head of state to face trial for genocide for the conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in addition to for crimes towards humanity and violations of the Geneva Conventions for the wars in Croatia and Kosovo.

Recalling the importance of the trial, Human Rights Watch, the advocacy group, noticed in a 2006 report that bringing the previous president earlier than a world legal tribunal “marked the tip of the period when being a head of state meant immunity from prosecution.”

Since then, it famous, different former heads of state, together with the previous Liberian prime minister Charles Taylor and the Iraqi chief Saddam Hussein, have been dropped at justice.

Mr. Taylor was sentenced to 50 years in jail for his position in atrocities dedicated throughout Sierra Leone’s civil conflict within the Nineteen Nineties. Mr. Hussein was convicted in 2006 by an Iraqi particular tribunal for crimes towards humanity for the brutal repression of a Shiite city within the Nineteen Eighties and sentenced to loss of life by hanging.

Advertisement

Mr. Milosevic died in his jail cell in The Hague in 2006, denying his victims the closure of a ultimate judgment, however the public airing of his heinous crimes was however an essential ethical and authorized reckoning.

Whereas the circumstances in Ukraine and the Balkan wars differ in basic methods, together with the scope and scale of the bloodshed, some parallels leap out — not least of which is Russia’s obfuscation and denial. Within the face of graphic proof that Ukrainian civilians within the suburb of Bucha, some with fingers sure, had been killed by Russian troopers, Moscow has claimed it’s all a “hoax.”

Mr. Milosevic, too, responded with a fantastic conspiracy idea when he was accused of complicity within the 1995 bloodbath at Srebrenica, in Bosnia, throughout which some 8,000 Muslim males and boys had been killed, many with their fingers tied behind their backs. He mentioned the folks actually answerable for the worst massacre in Europe since World Struggle II had been French intelligence operatives, Muslim officers from Bosnia and mercenaries.

The wartime bloodbath of civilians at a Sarajevo market was not finished by Serbs however staged by Muslims with our bodies from a morgue, he claimed.

“It’s all lies,” he mentioned, as his trial started.

Advertisement

Regardless of the echoes, authorized specialists say that bringing the Kremlin to account can be far tougher than it was with Mr. Milosevic.

Within the first place, no sitting president has ever been handed over to a world court docket. Whereas President Vladimir V. Putin has vital public assist and leads a nuclear energy, Mr. Milosevic had already been ousted from energy by the point he was despatched to The Hague in June 2001.

And Russia isn’t Serbia.

Mr. Putin is an authoritarian chief with vociferous antagonism towards the West and its authorized buildings.

The Serbian prime minister in energy when Mr. Milosevic was handed over for trial, Zoran Djindjic, was anticipating a rapprochement with the West, whereas $30 billion in overseas support to rebuild Serbia’s devastated financial system was at stake.

The burden of proof for conflict crimes, furthermore, may be very excessive.

Even with the Serbian authorities’s reluctant cooperation after Mr. Djindjic was assassinated in 2003, the duty was troublesome due to Mr. Milosevic’s obstructionism. A defiant Mr. Milosevic refused to acknowledge the U.N. conflict crimes tribunal, lied, dissembled and referred to as in sick when insider witnesses materialized.

Advertisement

Struggle crimes prosecutors are typically lucky sufficient to have real-time proof of atrocities at their disposal, however they nonetheless face huge challenges. Many dots should be linked.

Within the case of Mr. Putin, prosecutors must exhibit that he issued particular orders that led to particular atrocities or that he knew in regards to the crimes or did nothing to forestall them. Prosecutors would even have to indicate that Russian commanders had deliberately focused civilian buildings, or struck them throughout assaults that did not discriminate between civilian and navy targets.

Specialists say the Worldwide Prison Courtroom in The Hague affords the most effective likelihood for actual accountability for Russia. It was established in 1998 after separate United Nations tribunals that prosecuted mass atrocities in Rwanda and the previous Yugoslavia demonstrated the necessity for a standing judicial physique to deal with such instances.

America isn’t among the many Hague court docket’s 123 member nations, and Mr. Putin just lately instructed his authorities to withdraw from the treaty that created the court docket. His authorities assailed the tribunal as “ineffective and one-sided.”

In contrast, the tribunal that attempted Mr. Milosevic was created by the United Nations Safety Council in 1993 to trace down and punish these answerable for the horrific violence towards civilians through the breakup of Yugoslavia. As such, it had some political muscle behind it.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Chad’s ruling party wins majority in controversial parliamentary election

Published

on

Chad’s ruling party wins majority in controversial parliamentary election

Electoral body says President Mahamat Idriss Deby’s party secured 124 of 188 National Assembly seats in vote boycotted by opposition.

Chad’s governing party has taken the majority of seats in last month’s parliamentary election that was mostly boycotted by opposition parties, according to provisional results.

President Mahamat Idriss Deby’s party, the Patriotic Salvation Movement, has secured 124 of the 188 seats at the National Assembly, Ahmed Bartchiret, head of the electoral commission, announced late on Saturday.

The participation rate was put at 51.56 percent, which opposition parties said showed voter doubts about the validity of the contest.

The December 29 election was presented by Deby’s party as the last stage of the country’s transition to democracy after he took power as a military ruler in 2021.

Advertisement

The takeover followed the death of Deby’s father and longtime President Idriss Deby Itno, who spent three decades in power. Mahamat Deby eventually won last year’s disputed presidential vote.

The vote, which also included municipal and regional elections, was Chad’s first in more than a decade.

Deby had said the election would “pave the way for the era of decentralisation so long-awaited and desired by the Chadian people”, referring to the distribution of power beyond the national government to the various provincial and municipal levels.

‘Charade’

The election was boycotted by more than 10 opposition parties, including the main Transformers party, whose candidate, Succes Masra, came second in the presidential election.

The main opposition had called the election a “charade” and expressed worries that it would be a repeat of the presidential vote, which election observers said was not credible.

Advertisement

Last month’s vote came at a critical period for Chad, which is battling several security challenges – from attacks in the Lake Chad region by the Boko Haram armed group to ending decades-long military cooperation with France, its former colonial power.

The severing of military ties echoes recent moves by Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso, which all kicked out French troops and fostered closer ties with Russia after a string of coups in West and Central Africa’s Sahel region.

This week, security forces foiled an attack on the presidency that the government referred to as a “destabilisation attempt”.

Continue Reading

World

Sudan’s Military Recaptures Key City From Paramilitary Accused of Genocide

Published

on

Sudan’s Military Recaptures Key City From Paramilitary Accused of Genocide

The Sudanese military recaptured a key city in Sudan’s breadbasket region on Saturday, chasing out a paramilitary group that the United States accused last week of genocide.

Sudan’s information minister said the army had “liberated” the city, Wad Madani, while the military said that its troops were working to “clear the remnants of the rebels” from the area.

If the army can hold on to the city, it would be its most significant victory since the war started nearly two years ago. Experts said it would most likely shift the focus of the war northward to Khartoum, the capital.

Videos circulating online showed the army entering Wad Madani, which lies about 100 miles south of the capital. Local media reported that fighters with the paramilitary group, known as the Rapid Support Forces, or R.S.F., were fleeing the city.

The group’s leader, Gen. Mohamed Hamdan, admitted defeat but vowed to soon recapture the city. “Today we lost a round; we did not lose the battle,” he said in an audio address to his fighters and the Sudanese people.

Advertisement

The victory brought joyous scenes in army-held parts of the country among Sudanese who hoped it might signal a turning point in a ruinous civil war that has led to massacres, ethnic cleansing and a spreading famine in one of Africa’s largest countries.

People massed on the battle-scarred streets of Khartoum, while church bells pealed in Port Sudan, the wartime de facto capital where many Sudanese have fled the fighting. Celebrations also erupted among exiled Sudanese in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

The R.S.F. defeat came just over a year after the group seized Wad Madani in a victory that forced tens of thousands of people to flee and sent shock waves across Sudan. The group’s fighters went on to capture swaths of the country, far from their stronghold in Darfur in western Sudan.

But much of the most brutal fighting was in Darfur, where R.S.F. fighters massacred members of rival ethnic groups, according to human rights groups and the United Nations. Last week the United States formally determined that those killings constituted genocide, and it imposed sanctions on the R.S.F.’s leader, General Hamdan, who is widely known as Hemeti.

The United States also imposed sanctions on seven companies in the United Arab Emirates that it accused of trading gold and buying weapons on behalf of the R.S.F.

Advertisement

In recent months, the tide of the fight appeared to turn as the R.S.F. ceded territory in Khartoum and in parts of the east of the country. The military launched a counteroffensive in the area around Wad Madani, culminating in the recapture of the city on Saturday.

Still, it was too early to say if the victory would fundamentally change the course of the conflict. Since the first shots were fired in April 2023, the momentum of the fighting has swung back and forth, sometimes wildly.

The army and the R.S.F. were once allies, and their leaders joined to mount a military coup in 2021. But in the war between them, they have enjoyed the backing of different foreign powers.

The R.S.F. is supported by the United Arab Emirates, a wealthy Gulf sponsor that has supplied it with weapons and powerful drones, mostly smuggled into Sudan from neighboring countries.

The Sudanese military has obtained or bought weapons from Iran, Russia and Turkey. Both sides mine the country’s vast reserves of gold to finance the fight.

Advertisement

For ordinary Sudanese, the war has brought only misery, death and destruction, killing tens of thousands of people, scattering 11 million from their homes and setting off one of the world’s worst famines in decades.

The global authority on hunger, known as the I.P.C., reported last month that famine had spread to five areas in Sudan and was expected to reach another five in the coming months. In all, 25 million Sudanese suffer from acute or chronic hunger.

Both sides have committed atrocities and war crimes, according to the United Nations and American officials, although only the R.S.F. has been accused of ethnic cleansing.

Continue Reading

World

Biden admin slammed for ‘waiting’ to declare genocide in Sudan

Published

on

Biden admin slammed for ‘waiting’ to declare genocide in Sudan

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

JOHANNESBURG, South Africa – The Biden Administration has been blasted by the incoming Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho., for “waiting” until the outgoing President had only 13 days left in office before declaring rebel actions in Sudan, a country torn apart by 21 months of bitter war, to be “genocide.”

Earlier this week, Secretary of State Antony Blinken declared that members of the Sudanese rebel group, the Rapid Support Forces or RSF, “have committed genocide in Sudan.” 

Advertisement

In a statement, Blinken said, “The United States is committed to holding accountable those responsible for these atrocities. We are sanctioning RSF leader Mohammad Hamdan Daglo Mousa, known as Hemedti, for his role in systematic atrocities committed against the Sudanese people.”

BIDEN-HARRIS ADMIN ACCUSED OF ‘TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE’ TO SAVE THE PEOPLE OF WAR-TORN, FAMINE-STRICKEN SUDAN

The Biden administration recently declared members of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), committed genocide in Sudan. Pictured: U.S. President Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images.)

Blinken made his rulings, he stated, because “the RSF and RSF-aligned militias have continued to direct attacks against civilians, have systematically murdered men and boys—even infants—on an ethnic basis, and (have) deliberately targeted women and girls from certain ethnic groups for rape and other forms of brutal sexual violence.”

The Secretary continued, “Those same militias have targeted fleeing civilians, murdering innocent people escaping conflict, and prevented remaining civilians from accessing lifesaving supplies.”

Advertisement

Blinken added that the African nation is suffering through “a conflict of unmitigated brutality that has resulted in the world’s largest humanitarian catastrophe, leaving 638,000 Sudanese experiencing the worst famine in Sudan’s recent history, over 30 million people in need of humanitarian assistance, and tens of thousands dead.”

Risch has held out that the situation in Sudan has been catastrophic for well over a year, and called into question the timing of Blinken’s declaration. In a statement earlier this week, he wrote, “It has been nearly a year since I introduced a resolution calling the atrocities in Sudan what they are: a genocide. Additionally, I first called for Global Magnitsky sanctions to be imposed against the RSF and Hemedti 263 days ago – and yet these sanctions still have not been leveraged.”

BIDEN TRAVELS TO AFRICA WHERE POLICIES WERE ‘OVER-PROMISED AND UNDER-DELIVERED,’ AMID MASSIVE CHINA EXPANSION

Sudan fighting

Fighters of the Sudan Liberation Movement, a Sudanese rebel group active in Sudan’s Darfur State which supports army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, attend a graduation ceremony in the southeastern Gedaref state on March 28, 2024.  (Photo by AFP via Getty Images.)

Risch spoke to Fox News Digital, declaring, “The Biden Administration waited until it has less than two weeks in office to sanction RSF-affiliated companies and Hemedti for their crimes and to call atrocities in Sudan a genocide.”

Risch said, “This neglect to address the crisis in Sudan weakened America’s influence in the region and the world years ago. If the Biden Administration backed its rhetoric with action, Sudan would be in a better position today, more lives would be saved, and the foreign proxies exacerbating this conflict would be kept at bay.”

Advertisement

Risch added, “This war must end. Further instability in Sudan will only breed terrorism and regional turmoil, threatening global security. The U.S. and our allies must seek to end the killing and atrocities, end the malign actions by proxies, manage migration pressures from mass displacement and protect strategic interests like the Red Sea corridor.”

UAE, OTHER COUNTRIES REMOVED FROM INTERNATIONAL MONEY LAUNDERING WATCHLIST

Sudan bus

People board a truck as they leave Khartoum, Sudan, on June 19, 2023. The U.N. human rights office said in a new report on Friday, Feb. 23, 2024, that scores of people, including children, have been subjected to rape and other forms of sexual violence in the ongoing conflict in Sudan, assaults that may amount to war crimes. (AP Photo, File)

In a statement to Fox News Digital, the U.S. Special Envoy for Sudan, Thomas Perriello, said “Making an atrocity determination is an immense responsibility that the Secretary takes seriously.  Such determinations are based on a careful review of the facts and the law. It requires information not only of certain acts but also that those acts were done with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a racial, ethnic, national, or religious group. Information demonstrating intent is often difficult to find and assess.”
 
“Since the start of the conflict the United States has taken repeated action to promote accountability of the RSF for its atrocities conduct. The U.S. already had sanctioned five RSF leaders, including two of Hemedti’s brothers. We also determined in December 2023 that members of the RSF committed ethnic cleansing, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. So the designation of Hemedti and the genocide determination reflect a consistent effort to document and call out atrocities, acknowledge the suffering of victims and survivors, and pursue justice and accountability.”

In his declaration, Blinken announced new sanctions stating, “We are also sanctioning seven RSF-owned companies located in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and one individual for their roles in procuring weapons for the RSF.”

Senator Jim Risch

The new Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, U.S. Sen. Jim Risch (R-ID) speaks during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing. (Al Drago-Pool/Getty Images)

The Treasury Department also sent out a statement, virtually simultaneously to the one from State, saying “the RSF’s ability to acquire military equipment and generate finances continue to fuel the conflict in Sudan.” Treasury stated one particular company in the UAE, owned by a Sudanese national  “has provided money and weapons to the RSF.”  

Advertisement

Other UAE companies sanctioned this past week have been accused by the Treasury Department of handling financial transactions, of being “an essential part of the RSF’s efforts to finance its operations”, and of importing IT and security equipment .

One gold company in the UAE has been sanctioned because it has allegedly “purchased gold from Sudan, presumably for the benefit of the RSF, and subsequently transported it to Dubai.” Additionally, Treasury claimed “the RSF’s procurement director and brother of RSF leader Hemedti maintained access to (the gold company’s) bank account in the UAE, which held millions of dollars.”

Sudan massacre

Women from El Geneina, West Darfur,  weep after receiving news of their missing relatives in Ardamata, as they waited for them in Adre, Chad, November 7, 2023. Ardamata was the latest site of an ethnic purge led by the RSF and allied Arab militias against the ethnic African Masalit tribe.  (Reuters/El Tayeb Siddig.  )

“The United States continues to call for an end to this conflict that is putting innocent civilian lives in jeopardy,” Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Wally Adeyemo stated. “The Treasury Department remains committed to using every tool available to hold accountable those responsible for violating the human rights of the Sudanese people.”

In response to Fox News Digital questions involving UAE registered companies an official from its foreign ministry fired back, stating. “The UAE’s primary focus in Sudan remains on addressing the catastrophic humanitarian crisis. We continue to call for an immediate cease-fire and a peaceful resolution to this man-made conflict. In this regard, the UAE has already made absolutely clear that it is not providing any support or supplies to either of two belligerent warring parties in Sudan.”

Advertisement

The official continued, “the UAE takes its role in protecting the integrity of the international financial system extremely seriously. We remain committed to combating financial crime globally, enhancing international cooperation and developing strategies to address emerging risks.”

Continue Reading

Trending