Wyoming
NTSB Posts Preliminary Report On Wyoming PC12 Crash
The National Transportation Safety Board Preliminary Report on the July 26 fatal Pilatus PC12-47E accident in Wyoming does not offer much in the way of new information. It supports previous reporting that the single-engine turboprop, with seven on board including the owner-pilot, crashed after an apparent loss of autopilot function followed by a loss of control.
The NTSB report records, more specifically, that about an hour into the flight from Nebraska City Airport to Billings Logan International Airport in Montana, the aircraft (N357HE), cruising at 26,000 feet, maneuvered right of course and climbed to about 27,550 feet. It then began a right 270-degree turn. In the first 180 degrees of the turn, it descended to approximately 25,250 feet, then climbed back up to 27,025 feet in the final 90 degrees of the turn.
That maneuver was followed by a slight left turn followed by a descending 180-degree right turn. The pilot reported to Salt Lake City Air Route Traffic Control Center that he had lost his autopilot and was trying to regain control of the aircraft. The last data point recorded showed N347HE on a southerly heading at 21,900 feet. There were no more communications with ATC before the crash about 12 miles northeast of Recluse, Wyoming.
Wyoming
Sheridan Commission Approves Business Park
A proposed business park subdivision in Sheridan County was considered by the county commission.
County Planner Mark Reid detailed the Bucking Iron Business Park Subdivision.
Reid said there were minor recommendations from the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality and from the Staff from Public Works.
The commission voted to approve the subdivision with the recommendations.
Wyoming
Change to Wyoming law to recognize legality of corner crossing clears early hurdles
Wyoming
Gail Symons: Who Is Really Out Of Touch On The University Of Wyoming’s Budget?
Freedom Caucus leaders keep calling the University of Wyoming “out of touch.” Their presentation of the budget to the House this week exposed who is actually “out of touch.”
Representative John Bear (R-Gillette) said, “The $40 million cut was meant to ‘get their attention.’”
A state budget exists to govern. A budget built to punish exists to posture.
Two problems drive this mess. First, ideology replaces fact finding, process, and consequences. Second, House Appropriations shows a deep disconnect from what UW means to Wyoming, culturally and economically.
Start with the “land-grant” argument. One footnote requires students to learn about the Morrill Act. Apparently, the House Appropriators did not bother understanding it themselves.
Representative Ken Pendergraft (R-Sheridan) claimed UW “lost focus on the land grant concept” and should narrow toward agriculture, engineering, and education, “the things that benefit Wyoming specifically.” That framing treats land grant as shorthand for vocational training. Federal law has never defined land grant that way.
The Morrill Act created land-grant colleges “to teach such branches of learning as are related to agriculture and the mechanic arts (Engineering)…without excluding other scientific and classical studies,” and “in order to promote the liberal and practical education of the industrial classes.” Land grant means practical education and broad education.
So let’s look at the academic fields that were not protected from that $40M haircut. Nursing, pharmacy, law, business, criminal justice…even Engineering which is specified in the Morrill Act. Those don’t benefit Wyoming?
Wyoming’s Constitution points the same direction. Representative Steve Harshman reminded colleagues that university instruction should be “as nearly free as possible.” Broad education plus public access forms part of Wyoming’s long game, keeping talent here and training professionals here.
Freedom Caucus budgeting takes a different route. Culture disputes become budget penalties, enforced through dollars instead of open policy debate.
Pendergraft had drilled UW during hearings on course topics like ecofeminism and asked, “How is ecofeminism helpful for a student who wants to stay in Wyoming and work in Wyoming?” A budget hearing became a curriculum trial.
Inside the Legislature, colleagues called out the method. One legislator warned, “$40 million sure is an attention getter, but that cut reaches all sorts of programs.” Another asked what the cost of the courses offensive to the committee is compared to the cut.
Rep Lloyd Larsen (R-Lander) challenged Bear: “Explain that a little bit. Because that would almost suggest this action is retaliatory; that we’re going to show you.”
Process matters because process signals seriousness. Reports from Joint Appropriations included a claim that a member was “handed a script,” plus an assessment that meetings produced “no honest debate on anything.” Wyoming voters should not accept scripted budgeting for a flagship institution.
UW administrators told lawmakers an annual $20 million reduction hits payroll first. Estimates put the impact near $16 million in compensation, roughly 160 jobs. Those jobs sit in classrooms, labs, advising offices, extension work, and maintenance. Wyoming pays twice, once in layoffs, again in lost capacity.
Now the second problem: cultural blindness. UW serves as Wyoming’s statewide anchor, and athletics offers the clearest proof. A statewide survey found 84 percent of Wyomingites agree Cowboys and Cowgirls athletics serves as a source of pride.
War Memorial Stadium has been described as a “statewide reunion” on fall Saturdays. Lawmakers also heard a warning from colleagues: losing Division I status “will have a ripple effect across this state.”
Athletics also carries real dollars. UW athletics runs an expense budget “about $53 million.” Roughly $11.2 million comes from the state block grant, $5 million from the Cowboy Joe Club, and roughly $36 to $37 million comes from self-generated sources. The program has been credited with about $206.4 million in annual economic impact for Wyoming.
Then comes the risk profile Freedom Caucus leaders ignore. Governance chaos and punitive budgeting damage credibility with federal partners, private donors, and accreditors who expect stable, mission-driven leadership.
Endowment talk displays the competence gap in plain daylight. Bear suggested “the university should rely more on its substantial endowment funds rather than taxpayer dollars,” and use those funds to “stand on its own.”
Endowments are legally restricted by donor intent. You can’t liquidate them to pay for keeping the lights on or general faculty salaries.
Wyoming deserves better than governing by grievance. Bear’s admission of punishment and Pendergraft’s narrow (and inaccurate) view of land grant expose a House Appropriations operation driven by ideology, not stewardship.
This approach does not serve Wyoming’s best interests. It weakens a statewide institution, drives uncertainty, and signals contempt for the people who study, work, and build careers here.
It appears that it is the Freedom Caucus that is actually “out of touch.”
Gail Symons can be reached at: GailSymons@mac.com
-
Alabama1 week agoGeneva’s Kiera Howell, 16, auditions for ‘American Idol’ season 24
-
Illinois1 week ago2026 IHSA Illinois Wrestling State Finals Schedule And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Culture1 week agoTry This Quiz on Passionate Lines From Popular Literature
-
Science1 week agoTorrance residents call for the ban of ‘flesh-eating’ chemical used at refinery
-
Politics1 week agoWest Virginia worked with ICE — 650 arrests later, officials say Minnesota-style ‘chaos’ is a choice
-
Science1 week agoTrumpRx is launched: How it works and what Democrats say about it
-
Fitness1 week ago13 best fitness watches for 2026, tried and tested
-
Health6 days agoJames Van Der Beek shared colorectal cancer warning sign months before his death