Connect with us

Washington

US and Papua New Guinea poised to sign defense pact as Washington, Beijing vie for influence in the Pacific | CNN

Published

on

US and Papua New Guinea poised to sign defense pact as Washington, Beijing vie for influence in the Pacific | CNN




CNN
 — 

The United States and Papua New Guinea are poised to sign a new bilateral defense cooperation agreement – a move that has sparked controversy in the Pacific Island nation and comes as Washington and China jostle for influence in the region.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Papua New Guinea (PNG) Prime Minister James Marape were scheduled to sign the pact and a maritime security agreement during Blinken’s visit to the capital Port Moresby on Sunday and Monday, the US State Department said Thursday.

Advance text of the agreements were not released by either side, but the new defense cooperation was expected to expand US access to military and other facilities in PNG, bolstering Washington’s security ties in the South Pacific.

Advertisement

That region – a constellation of sparsely populated island and archipelago nations and territories as well as New Zealand and Australia – has outsized strategic significance. The Pacific Islands, for example, were the site of decisive battles during World War Two.

The region has taken on renewed importance for Washington as it seeks to bolster its relationships and presence in Asia amid rising tensions with an assertive China that’s rapidly expanded its naval capabilities in recent years.

Those concerns were heightened last year after Beijing signed a security pact with the Solomon Islands – and tried, but failed, to win support for a sweeping, regional trade and security communique with Pacific Island nations.

Blinken’s visit to PNG comes after US President Joe Biden last week cut short an Asia trip that would have included stops in Port Moresby and Sydney, Australia, due to ongoing debt ceiling negotiations at home.

In a statement Saturday, PNG framed its expected agreement with the US as an opportunity to advance its infrastructure and capacity for national defense at a time of growing global security concerns.

Advertisement

“Papua New Guinea does not have enemies but it pays to be prepared. Territorial dispute is (imminent), as in the case of Ukraine-Russia,” the statement said.

“This agreement is not about geopolitics but rather recognizes the country’s need to build its defense capabilities because border disputes are inevitable in the future,” it said, adding it did not preclude the government from “working with” other countries, including China.

China has become a significant player in the country’s economy, both as an investor and consumer of its rich natural resources.

The US and PNG militaries already have a cooperative security assistance relationship focused primarily on joint humanitarian exercises and the training of PNG military personnel, according to the State Department.

The signing of the agreement has sparked debate in Papua New Guinea – including over a lack of transparency from the government on what it entailed, while purported leaked drafts circulated online.

Advertisement

The pact would need Parliament’s approval and could face judicial challenges, experts say.

But its signing would send a significant message to the region.

“PNG signing a defense agreement signals to the rest of the Pacific that its largest nation has chosen the West – Australia and the US – as its security partner,” said Maholopa Laveil, FDC Pacific Fellow at the Lowy Institute, seconded from the University of Papua New Guinea.

The pact, if signed – after Fiji reported ending its police training agreement with China earlier this year – “are major wins, getting the largest Pacific nations on side for the US in its attempts to limit China’s influence in the region,” Laveil said, adding that Marape may “leverage the threat of China” to request more development assistance from the US.

Meanwhile, Australia is preparing to sign its own security treaty with PNG.

Advertisement

The expected signing of the US deal – especially on the heels of the Solomon Islands’ security pact with China last year – may also raise concerns about lines of alignment being drawn in a region that has long prioritized projecting strength through unity.

“(Signing such pacts) can also create divisions,” said Patrick Kaiku, an academic focused on international relations at the University of Papua New Guinea, noting a perspective among Pacific Island states that they should not take sides in geopolitical rivalries.

“If states are not adhering to it … that can also be a problem for regional solidarity,” he said.

Blinken is expected to meet with leaders of the Pacific Island Forum regional body in Port Moresby on Monday, the forum has said, taking Biden’s place at the gathering.

The cancellation of Biden’s trip – which would have been the first from a sitting US President to Papua New Guinea – has been characterized by some observers as a potential ding to Washington’s recent bid to up its engagement with the region.

Advertisement

That bid has included opening embassies in the Solomon Islands and Tonga this year, while Biden hosted Pacific Island leaders in Washington for a summit in September and released the first-ever national strategy on engaging the Pacific Islands.

“US President Joe Biden’s now-scrapped visit to PNG was meant to be a culmination of these efforts and send a powerful signal to Pacific Islanders about the US commitment to the region,” said Parker Novak, a non-resident follow at the Atlantic Council think tank in Washington’s Global China Hub.

“Instead, it underlines skepticism about the United States’ ability to follow through on the promises it has made,” Novak said, adding that with Blinken’s visit and other expected diplomacy, it may not do “long-term damage to US efforts in the Pacific.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Mavs take down Pistons

Published

on

Mavs take down Pistons


For you skeptics that have dismissed the Mavericks’ season as a goner, consider Friday’s 123-117 win over the Detroit Pistons a “take that” moment.

The Mavericks stopped a five-game home losing streak as they dusted the Pistons at American Airlines Center behind a season-best 31 points from Spencer Dinwiddie and 27 from P.J. Washington.

And, they proved that they are perfectly capable of learning from their mistakes.

It was just two nights earlier that the Mavericks had a seven-point lead in the final minute against Indiana, only to lose 135-131.

Advertisement

This time, the Mavericks were up by seven points with under two minutes left. Yet, you got the feeling that the Pistons sensed vulnerability. They turned up the defensive heat, but the Mavericks played with more poise and better execution. They also made seven of nine free throws down the stretch.

‘I think being in Indiana, learning from our mistakes, I said after (that) game that we’ll be better and I thought we were better at being able to take the ball out and get the ball past half court and take care of the ball,” coach Jason Kidd said. “The guys learned from that experience. That could have been a game that stuck with us for a while, but they turned the page.”

By doing so, they improved to 34-37 and kept the pressure on Phoenix and Sacramento, the two teams directly in front of them in the Western Conference standings. Two of those three teams are likely to be in the play-in tournament. One likely will be on the outside looking in.

To say the least, it was a critical game.

“It was huge, definitely a big win,” Washington said. “I’m glad we got this one. It puts us in a great (frame of mind) going forward. I can’t wait to get on the road and battle with those teams, too.”

Advertisement

And the Mavericks are going to have to earn their way into the play-in tournament on the road, where they play their next four games and seven of their final 11, starting Monday in Brooklyn.

“Anytime you get the getaway game before you go on the road feels good,” Kidd said of the importance of the win, which ended a stretch of nine losses in their past 10 games. “We’ll turn the page. We got Brooklyn on Monday and New York on Tuesday, so we’ll catch our breath and then go into a back-to-back. It’s good to go on the road with a win.”

The Mavericks led by 12 early in the fourth quarter, but they have had trouble lately closing out games. Perhaps knowing that, the Pistons closed the gap to 102-98 before Washington drilled a corner three-pointer.

That steadied the Mavericks briefly, but it was going to require poise down the stretch. That’s where the fresh memory of Wednesday night helped.

“Wednesday’s game was on me,” Washington said. “I missed too many free throws. I think we executed better tonight in the last minute and a half. And obviously we won the game. I think guys felt that one in Indiana and didn’t want that to happen again tonight.”

A crucial play came when Dennis Schroder’s three pointer cut the Mavericks’ lead to 114-110. After each team misfired, the Mavericks missed and the ball went out of bounds. Originally, possession was given to Detroit, but the call was overturned when Jason Kidd challenged it and the Mavericks had possession with 1:07 to go.

Dinwiddie was fouled, but made only the second of two free throws for a five-point advantage.

Advertisement

Schroder was fouled with 48 ticks left, with Kai Jones fouling out on the play. Schroder helped out the Mavericks by missing the first of the two freebies. The Mavericks had trouble handling Detroit’s pressure, but ran a smart play that got Washington a clear path to the rim, where he was met and fouled by Cade Cunningham, who had 35 points.

Washington’s free throw (he missed the second) with 36.9 showing made it 116-111. This time, unlike Wednesday, there would be no late meltdown.

Cunningham would slice through the Mavericks twice, but Dinwiddie made two free throws and Brandon Williams converted a three-point play after taking a nice feed from Klay Thompson, who had 20 points, for a 121-115 lead with 16 seconds left to ice it.

All of those late plays required execution, which had been missing 48 hours earlier in Indiana.

And, also important, was the way the Mavericks handled the bigger Pistons in the paint. The Mavericks actually won the rebounding battle, 44-41.

Advertisement

Said Kidd: “We knew we had to come with some physicality. That’s what they do. So I thought we matched it and didn’t back down. They might be a little bigger than us, but being able to rebound and play with some pace, I thought everyone did their part and did it at a high level.”

X: @ESefko





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Washington flag redesign blasted as “un-American”

Published

on

Washington flag redesign blasted as “un-American”


A bill which would redesign the Washington State flag has been blasted as “un-American” by state Republicans who fear a redesign would remove George Washington from the state flag.

The bill, HB 1938, which was introduced by Democratic Washington state Representative Strom Peterson, does not expressly call for the removal of George Washington from the state flag, but does state that “while George Washington is an important national figure, he has limited historical connection to the state itself. This makes his image less meaningful as a symbol for the state.”

Newsweek contacted Peterson for comment via email on Friday.

Why It Matters

Republican Representative Hunter Abell, one of the lawmakers opposed to the proposition, raised concerns that potentially removing George Washington from the flag could result in changing the name of the state itself, although that has not been raised by the bill or by other lawmakers.

Advertisement

Democratic leadership also does not appear to be keen on the bill, saying they will probably not move on it this year as they have other priorities, according to reporting from the Washington State Standard.

The sun shines on the Washington state flag at the Capitol in Olympia, Wash., Monday, June 18, 2018.

Ted S. Warren/Associated Press

What To Know

Representative Peterson’s bill states, “The legislature finds that the Washington 7 state flag often faces criticism for its poor design and lack of relevance to the state’s identity. The flag features a detailed portrait of George Washington, making it overly complex and difficult to reproduce which is a violation of key flag design principles that prioritize simplicity.”

The bill does state that any redesigns to the state flag would have to be approved via a referendum asking voters whether they would like to keep the existing design or adopt any new one.

However, the Washington State Standard’s report noted that Republicans slammed the bill as “un-American.”

Washington State did not exist in George Washington’s time. It was occupied by Britain and the United States in 1818 and did not become an official state until 1889, 80 years after Washington’s death in 1799.

Advertisement

Its current state flag was officially adopted in March 1923 and features a dark green field with the state seal in the center. The seal consists of a portrait of George Washington, the first U.S. president, set against a light-colored background inside a circular band.

What People Are Saying

State Representative Strom Peterson said, according to the Washington State Standard: “[We’re] not asking to remove George Washington from the history of Washington state… This is more about the aesthetics of the flag and what the flag could represent to bring people across the state together.”

State Representative Hunter Abell said, according to the Washington State Standard: “To be the only state in the nation to be named after a president is a distinct honor… One that we should not take for granted and we certainly should not be ashamed of or attempt to eliminate him from our flag.”

What Happens Next

Peterson’s bill would create a committee of legislators from both parties, historians, Native Americans, artistic leaders, and designers, to redesign the flag by 2028.

However, the Washington State Standard reported that the bill is not likely to move forward this year, with lawmakers to focus on other priorities.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Deebo Samuel on trade to Washington: I like to win

Published

on

Deebo Samuel on trade to Washington: I like to win


After the 49ers finished off a disappointing 6-11 season, Deebo Samuel requested a trade. The 49ers granted his wish March 1 in exchange for a fifth-round pick.

He goes from a team in rebuild mode to one that is ascending, having made the NFC Championship Game last season.

Samuel said in his introductory news conference Thursday that his decision was “tougher than most people think” because of the relationships he developed in San Francisco. He gave the 49ers a list of five preferred destinations, with Washington one of the five.

“Being in San Francisco, I like winners. I like to win,” Samuel said, via David Bonilla of 49erswebzone. com. “I’m not one of your biggest losers. They went to the NFC Championship.”

Advertisement

The Commanders had several draws for Samuel, including his familiarity with General Manager Adam Peters, who previously served as the 49ers’ assistant G.M., and his desire to return to the East Coast. The Commanders’ immediate turnaround with quarterback Jayden Daniels also was a plus.

It didn’t hurt that the team committed to Samuel by reworking his contract to guarantee $17 million of his 2025 salary while adding $3 million in incentives.

“That meant a lot,” Samuel said. “By not stepping on the field for this team, not meeting everybody in the building, it just kind of shows what they think. And for me, on my end, it’s just like, they put as much trust in me to do the things they did as far as my contract, I can’t come in here and let them down.

“I’ve got to give it my all, do all the things that I need to do to be the best version of myself when I come here.”

Samuel is coming off a disappointing season with only 806 scrimmage yards and four total touchdowns.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending