Connect with us

Washington

TikTok’s New Defense in Washington: Going on the Offense

Published

on

TikTok’s New Defense in Washington: Going on the Offense


WASHINGTON — Final week, TikTok’s chief government, Shou Zi Chew, met with a number of influential assume tanks and public curiosity teams in Washington, sharing particulars on how his firm plans to forestall knowledge on American customers from ever leaving the USA. And the corporate’s lobbyists swarmed the workplaces of lawmakers who’ve launched payments to ban the app, telling them that TikTok could be trusted to guard the data.

TikTok, the favored Chinese language-owned video app, has been within the cross-hairs of American regulators for years now, with each the Trump and Biden administrations weighing how to make sure that details about Individuals who use the service doesn’t land within the arms of Beijing officers.

By means of all of it, the corporate has maintained a low profile in Washington, preserving its confidential interactions with authorities officers below wraps and eschewing extra typical lobbying ways.

However as talks with the Biden administration drag on, stress on the corporate has arrived in waves from elsewhere. Congress, state lawmakers, faculty campuses and cities have adopted or thought of guidelines to outlaw the app.

Advertisement

Now, TikTok is upending its technique for the way to take care of U.S. officers. The brand new sport plan: Step out of the shadows.

“We’ve shifted our strategy,” mentioned Erich Andersen, normal counsel of ByteDance, the Chinese language proprietor of TikTok. He mentioned that the corporate had been “heads down” in personal conversations with a committee led by the Biden administration to evaluate overseas investments in companies in the USA, however that then the federal government put the negotiations “on pause.”

“What we discovered, sadly the laborious approach, this fall was it was crucial for us to speed up our personal rationalization of what we had been ready to do and the extent of commitments on the nationwide safety course of,” Mr. Andersen mentioned.

TikTok is on the middle of a geopolitical and financial battle between the USA and China over tech management and nationwide safety. The end result of TikTok’s negotiations with the U.S. authorities might have broad implications for expertise and web corporations, shaping how freely digital knowledge flows between nations.

For 2 years, TikTok has been in confidential talks with the administration’s evaluate panel, the Committee on Overseas Funding in the USA, or CFIUS, to deal with questions on ByteDance’s relationship with the Chinese language authorities and whether or not that hyperlink might put the delicate knowledge of 100 million U.S. customers into the arms of Beijing officers. The corporate assumed that these talks would attain a decision quickly after it submitted a 90-page proposal to the administration in August.

Advertisement

Below the proposal, known as Mission Texas, TikTok would stay owned by ByteDance. However it could take quite a lot of steps that it mentioned would forestall the Chinese language authorities from accessing knowledge on U.S. customers and provide the U.S. authorities oversight of the platform. A few of these steps have been put in place since October.

The corporate has proposed placing all U.S. person knowledge into home servers owned and operated by Oracle, the American software program big. The information wouldn’t be allowed to be transferred outdoors the USA, nor wouldn’t it be accessible to ByteDance or TikTok workers outdoors the nation.

This system proposes having CFIUS conduct common audits of the brand new knowledge system and creating a brand new unit, TikTok U.S. Information Safety, with 2,500 engineers, safety specialists, and belief and security officers, all primarily based in the USA, who’ve entry to TikTok’s U.S. person knowledge for enterprise capabilities. The unit would report back to a three-member board assigned by CFIUS. As well as, TikTok’s supply code, which provides perception into why sure movies are proven in customers’ feeds, could be reviewed by Oracle and a third-party inspector.

Some particulars of the proposal had been reported earlier by The Wall Road Journal.

“We knew that, with the intention to earn belief, we must construct a system that offered an unprecedented stage of safety and transparency — that’s what we’ve executed and can proceed to do,” Mr. Chew mentioned in an interview.

Advertisement

The proposal, although, has yielded little response from the panel, Mr. Andersen mentioned. TikTok mentioned it had requested concerning the standing of the panel’s evaluate in quite a few emails and acquired little response. The corporate’s officers study concerning the administration’s considering on the proposal solely by means of information protection, they mentioned.

In a press release, a spokeswoman for the Treasury Division, the lead company of CFIUS, mentioned the panel was “dedicated to taking all crucial actions inside its authority to safeguard U.S. nationwide safety.” She declined to remark about TikTok’s depiction of the negotiations, saying the panel doesn’t touch upon circumstances it could or will not be reviewing.

TikTok’s extra aggressive lobbying stance won’t essentially yield completely different outcomes. The corporate has few allies in Washington. Essentially the most highly effective tech lobbying teams, just like the Chamber of Progress and TechNet, favor to symbolize American corporations and have insurance policies towards representing Chinese language corporations. In truth, many massive tech corporations, like Meta, have argued that TikTok poses a safety risk.

And lawmakers in each events have expressed concern. Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia and the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, has mentioned that the corporate has misrepresented the way it protects U.S. knowledge from Chinese language-based workers, and that he’s contemplating a invoice to outlaw the app in the USA.

On Tuesday, Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, launched a invoice to ban the app for all American customers after efficiently passing a invoice in December that banned the app on all units issued by the federal authorities.

Advertisement

“A midway answer isn’t any answer in any respect,” mentioned Mr. Hawley, who’s amongst a rising variety of lawmakers who don’t see a compromise on knowledge storage and entry as an answer to TikTok’s safety dangers.

But the rising stress on the corporate has left it few choices aside from altering its strategy, many outdoors specialists say.

“The problem has grow to be public in a approach that they’ll’t ignore,” mentioned Graham Webster, the editor in chief of the DigiChina Mission on the Stanford College Cyber Coverage Heart. “And this can be their approach of pushing to truly get the CFIUS settlement accomplished, which is de facto their finest likelihood of a sustainable enterprise path in the USA.”

In a 24-hour go to to Washington final week, Mr. Chew held 4 back-to-back 90-minute conferences with assume tanks like New America, teachers and public curiosity teams resembling Public Data. Within the firm’s momentary WeWork suites close to Capitol Hill, Mr. Chew and Mr. Andersen outlined the guarantees in Mission Texas in a presentation with graphics on how the info is saved in Oracle’s cloud and TikTok’s appointment of a content material moderation board and auditors.

They informed the teams that the corporate rebuked allegations that China interferes within the enterprise, however that that they had constructed the system to show their dedication to safety, in accordance with folks on the conferences.

Advertisement

“It appeared like a critical effort,” mentioned Matt Perault, the director of the Heart on Expertise Coverage on the College of North Carolina, who attended a briefing and whose middle receives funding from TikTok.

He added that the corporate gave the impression to be making an attempt to shift the dialogue about it from hypothetical dangers to operational and technical options. TikTok would spend $1.5 billion to arrange its proposed plan after which as a lot as $1 billion a 12 months. U.S. customers could have a barely worse expertise with the app outdoors the nation, a price of working from Oracle’s servers, the corporate executives mentioned.

Mr. Perault mentioned even with these efforts, “they’ll’t make one thing zero danger.”

“There isn’t a approach they’ll assure knowledge gained’t go to an adversary indirectly,” he mentioned.

As a part of its extra aggressive public relations offensive, TikTok has invited journalists to Los Angeles this month for a first-time tour of what it calls its “transparency and accountability middle,” a bodily house the place it exhibits how people and expertise average movies on the platform.

Advertisement

In latest days, TikTok and ByteDance have posted half a dozen communications and coverage job openings in Washington. The brand new jobs would add to the 40 lobbyists whom the businesses now have on contract or as workers. These lobbyists embrace 4 former members of Congress, resembling Trent Lott, the previous Republican Senate majority chief, and John Breaux, a former Democratic senator from Louisiana. The businesses have additionally lately posted job openings for roles doing strategic communications and coverage for engagement with state and federal officers.

ByteDance spent $4.2 million in federal lobbying within the first three quarters of 2022 and is predicted to far outpace that determine this 12 months.

A spokeswoman for TikTok mentioned the corporate’s lobbyists had a tough time scheduling conferences with lawmakers who had been vital of the corporate in TV appearances.

Representatives Mike Gallagher, a Wisconsin Republican, and Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, who’re co-sponsors of the invoice in Congress to ban TikTok, mentioned they deliberate to satisfy with the corporate quickly.

However Mr. Krishnamoorthi made it clear that he wouldn’t be simply persuaded to alter his place. He mentioned in an interview that TikTok was “taking a extra aggressive stance in Washington,” however that the corporate had but to meaningfully tackle a few of his considerations, resembling how it could reply to a Chinese language media legislation that allowed the federal government to secretly demand knowledge from Chinese language corporations and residents.

Advertisement

Mr. Gallagher mentioned he needed extra info from CFIUS about ByteDance’s proposed possession construction. “I are available in considerably skeptical — I favor a ban or a compelled sale, however I’m greater than keen to do my due diligence in inspecting the technical points of such an association,” he mentioned. And even then, he mentioned, “the place we have now numerous unanswered questions” is round how its advice system works.

Mr. Gallagher mentioned new questions stored popping up as properly. He pointed to stories about ByteDance monitoring journalists, and Michael Beckerman, TikTok’s head of public coverage for the Americas, struggling in a latest CNN interview to reply questions on China’s remedy of Uyghurs, a Muslim minority within the Chinese language area of Xinjiang.

“What we’ve seen is a gradual drip of adverse info that calls into query what they’ve mentioned publicly,” Mr. Gallagher mentioned. “After I see issues like that, what am I left to conclude aside from ByteDance and TikTok are afraid of offending their overlords in Beijing? It doesn’t reassure folks like me.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Jayden Daniels Will Keep Commanders Competitive vs. Lions

Published

on

Jayden Daniels Will Keep Commanders Competitive vs. Lions


The Washington Commanders have made many changes to go from a four-win team to three wins away from winning the Super Bowl, but none have been more impactful than drafting quarterback Jayden Daniels with the No. 2 overall pick.

Daniels may be a rookie, but he plays like an established veteran. That’s why Bleacher Report writer Maurice Moton believes that the Commanders will be competitive this weekend against the 15-2 Detroit Lions in the Divisional Round.

“The Commanders slowed down the Buccaneers’ third-ranked offense in a road victory last week, and Daniels helped position them to kick the game-winning field,” Moton writes.

“Head coach Dan Quinn and coordinator Joe Whitt have molded the team’s defense into a respectable unit throughout the season. In clutch moments, Daniels is far beyond his years.

Advertisement

“Washington won’t shut down the Lions offense, but along with Daniels, it can do enough to keep the score margin in the single digits.”

The Commanders are still underdogs since the Lions have arguably been the best team in the NFL this season, but Daniels won’t allow Washington to fold. He hasn’t done so yet, so there’s no reason why it would happen now.

Kickoff between the Commanders and Lions is scheduled for tomorrow at 8 p.m. ET.

Stick with CommanderGameday and the Locked On Commanders podcast for more FREE coverage of the Washington Commanders throughout the 2024 season.

• Commanders Preparing for Lions OC Ben Johnson Who Will ‘Test Your Discipline’

Advertisement

• Dan Quinn Details Commanders Rookie’s Performance in Playoff Game, He Was Impressed

• What Lions’ Amon-Ra St. Brown Said About Commanders WR, It’s Come Full Circle

• Analyst Predicts Commanders Upset vs. Lions



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

George Washington stays unbeaten with 68-41 victory at Capital – WV MetroNews

Published

on

George Washington stays unbeaten with 68-41 victory at Capital – WV MetroNews


CHARLESTON, W.Va. — A Capital team short on experience and playing for the first time since New Year’s Eve faced quite a challenge Thursday night as it welcomed one of the state’s most polished teams in nearby rival George Washington.

The Patriots showed no sign of letting a nearby rival hang around and continued their stellar start to the season by never trailing in a resounding 68-41 victory.

“Shooting takes pressure off how we have to defend, but our defense has been the key to everything we’ve done to this point,” veteran GW head coach Rick Greene said.

The result prolongs GW’s unbeaten start to the season through at least its first eight games.

Advertisement

This one was never in doubt as the Patriots’ combination of efficient offense and lockdown defense left the Cougars playing catch-up throughout.

GW’s Chuck Kelley accounted for the game’s first two field goals and scored his team’s first six points, before Gale Lamb got in on the action and went on a personal 7-0 run that upped the Patriot lead to 14-4.

David Robinson, who led Capital with 17 points, scored five in the opening frame to keep his team within striking distance as it faced a 14-7 deficit entering the second.

After Capital’s Grant Barclay provided a bucket to start the second quarter, it was all GW the remainder of the opening half.

Lamb hit a pair of three-pointers around a Kelley transition layup, forcing the Cougars to call timeout 5:05 before halftime as they trailed 22-9.

Advertisement

At that point, Lamb was 5 for 5 with 14 points.

“He didn’t take a shot he couldn’t hit,” Greene said. “He is a really good shooter and he’s shooting with a lot of confidence. The kids want him to shoot the ball, so if you’re a shooter and you know your teammates want you to shoot it, it gives you that little bit of freedom and relaxation.”

Out of the break in the action, GW’s Noah Lewis scored inside twice, with teammate Sai’Vyon Brown knocking down a three in between. It was 29-9 at that point, and Kelley accounted for the final points of the half on a follow-up basket to send the visitors to the locker room with a commanding 33-11 advantage.

While Lamb and Kelley were both 5 for 5 with 24 combined points through two quarters, the Cougars were shooting 5 for 16 and being out-rebounded, 15-5.

“The guys coming off the bench are trying to match the defensive intensity of the first five, and that’s making us really good,” Greene said.

Advertisement

Kelley picked up where he left off to start the second half, scoring five points over the first 1:03.

Capital (2-4) upped the pace itself and Trevaun Tyson was the main beneficiary, scoring all nine of his points in the third quarter.

The Cougars doubled the first-half field goal total in the third period alone, making 10-of-15 shots to keep pace with the Patriots for that 8-minute stretch.

“It was a nice conversation at halftime,” Capital head coach Cookie Miller said. “We got them going a little bit and we have to come out like that at the beginning. It was a rough 18 days, but that’s not excuse. We had great practices for us to give that showing, but at the end of the day, hats off to them for knowing their plays and getting into things. They’ve been together for a long time.”

Unfortunately for Miller’s team, Lamb maintained his efficient play and scored nine points in the frame to spark GW’s 22-point quarter.

Advertisement

That allowed the Patriots to lead 55-32 entering the fourth, and they cruised from there.

GW made 25-of-44 shots to shoot better than 56 percent. Lamb led all players with 24 points and made 7-of-8 shots. Kelley was also 7 for 8 and scored 15.

Noah Lewis chipped in with seven points and a game-high 10 rebounds, while Jeff Harris added five points and eight boards. That duo was instrumental in allowing GW to finish with a convincing 36-16 rebounding edge.

Tyson had half of his team’s boards. 

The Cougars made 18-of-45 shots, but only one three-pointer to the Patriots’ five.

Advertisement

“Those guys have been together for a long time. Kudos to them,” Miller said. “Greene has them moving and doing what they’re supposed to doing. We’re trying to get on their level and soon we will be on their level.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Lawmakers again trying to lower legal alcohol limit for drivers in Washington • Washington State Standard

Published

on

Lawmakers again trying to lower legal alcohol limit for drivers in Washington • Washington State Standard


A measure to lower the legal limit for drunk driving in Washington cleared its first legislative hurdle Thursday.

If passed, Washington would join Utah as the only state with a 0.05% blood alcohol concentration limit. Other states have considered similar legislation, but haven’t passed it.

Utah made the move in 2018. The state was also the first to lower the limit from 0.1% to 0.08% in the 1980s.

After the switch from 0.08% to 0.05%, Utah saw a 20% drop in fatal crashes, but that figure crept back up during the COVID-19 pandemic, in line with national trends.

Advertisement

The bill in Washington is sponsored by Sen. John Lovick, D-Mill Creek. Lovick was a longtime Washington State Patrol trooper before serving as Snohomish County sheriff. 

“I see driving behavior beyond anything I could have imagined when I started as a state trooper,” Lovick told the Senate Law & Justice Committee this week. “Drivers are speeding, following too close, passing on the shoulders, running red lights, driving aggressively. Drunk drivers have made our communities unsafe.”

Opponents argue the legislation, Senate Bill 5067, would elevate the liability risk for bars and other establishments that sell alcohol.

Traffic deaths have risen rapidly in recent years, from 538 in 2019 to 809 in 2023, according to the Washington Traffic Safety Commission. The 2023 figure was the most deaths on Washington roads since 1990.

Of those 809 deaths, impaired drivers were involved in about half.

Advertisement

Compared to those driving sober, drivers with a blood alcohol concentration over 0.05% are twice as likely to crash, said Mark McKechnie, the director of external relations for the traffic safety commission. When that rises to 0.07%, the risk triples.

Early estimates for the first half of 2024 showed a marked decline in deaths on Washington roads, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The lower legal limit would take effect July 1, 2026. 

As part of the legislation, the Washington Traffic Safety Commission would run a campaign to inform the public of the new legal limit. The Washington State Institute for Public Policy would have to evaluate the impacts of the new law in a report submitted to the Legislature.

By way of background

Lovick and others have tried repeatedly in recent years to lower the legal limit. The measure has never reached the Senate floor.

Advertisement

Last year, one of the proposal’s chief backers, Sen. Marko Liias, D-Edmonds, expressed frustration after the Senate passed over his drunk driving bill and instead took up legislation to solidify “The Evergreen State” as Washington’s official nickname.

Experts have said consuming a beer or a glass of wine with dinner wouldn’t land drivers above the lowered legal limit.

Two hours after his first drink, a 180-pound man would reach 0.05% after drinking three beers or three glasses of wine. The same is true after two hours for a 140-pound woman, after two beers or glasses of wine.

Worldwide, more than 100 countries have legal limits of 0.05% or lower. 

The concerns

As in years past, hospitality industry groups oppose the legislation. They have argued the proposal could hurt bars and other establishments that rely on alcohol sales to stay afloat.

Advertisement

Julia Gorton, a lobbyist for the Washington Hospitality Association, noted it’s already illegal to drive with a 0.05% blood alcohol concentration if officers see clear signs of impairment.

This legislation “will impact those who decide to stop drinking before they are impaired,” she said. “These are individuals choosing to behave responsibly, who will now be subject to the strongest and strictest DUI penalties in the country.”

The Washington Wine Institute’s Executive Director Josh McDonald said it would be hard for servers to identify impairment at the lower legal limit so they could cut off service.

Jason Lantz, of the Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, noted Colorado and New York also have 0.05% limits, but violations at that level come with lower penalties.

He recommended a similar two-tier system, with the 0.05% limit considered “driving after consumption” instead of driving under the influence.

Advertisement

Amy Freedheim, the chair of the Felony Traffic Unit in the King County prosecutor’s office, tried to assuage concerns. She argued the lower limit wouldn’t lead to more arrests or lawsuits against bars held liable for crashes caused by impaired drivers.

On Thursday, Sen. Phil Fortunato, R-Auburn, offered an amendment to Lovick’s bill, lowering a blood alcohol concentration limit already in state law that brings stiffer penalties. The amendment would have dropped the limit from 0.15% to 0.12%. 

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement

Penalties for first-time offenders at the higher threshold include a minimum $500 fine and at least two days in jail, 30 days of electronic home monitoring or a 120-day 24/7 sobriety program.

Below the 0.15% level, drunk driving penalties drop to a minimum fine of $350 and at least one day in jail, 15 days of electronic home monitoring or a 90-day sobriety program.

“Right now you go from .08 to .15. There’s nothing in the middle,” Fortunato said.

Advertisement

Sen. Manka Dhingra, D-Redmond, said she didn’t disagree with Fortunato’s change, but recognized the political reality for the proposal.

“I think it has been very challenging to get this bill out of the Senate with even the decrease to .05,” she said. “Let’s try to focus on getting the limit to .05, and then let’s continue working toward making sure that we are addressing the penalties.”

The committee approved Lovick’s proposal without Fortunato’s amendment. 

The House version of the bill is set for a committee hearing Tuesday.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending