Connect with us

Washington

Re-building Washington’s offensive line for 2023

Published

on

Re-building Washington’s offensive line for 2023


Going into the 2022 season, it appeared that Washington’s offensive line, even with the lack of Ereck Flowers and Brandon Scherff, had the capability to be respectable. Charles Leno had been prolonged, Chase Roullier was coming again wholesome, and there was an expectation that Sam Cosmi was going to proceed to develop into his spot at proper sort out.

The guard room regarded pretty common, however deep, with Wes Schweitzer, Andrew Norwell, Trai Turner, and Saahdiq Charles getting into his third season. Chris Paul, added within the draft, was mentioned with pleasure as properly. Rounding out the group had been strong depth items, middle Tyler Larsen and swing sort out Cornelius Lucas.

Sadly, a variety of elements, amongst them damage and poor QB play, in addition to the regression of Cosmi, led to Washington’s offensive line being its weakest unit in 2022.

How, precisely, Washington would deal with the offensive line going into 2023 was up within the air, based mostly largely on how the crew would strategy the quarterback state of affairs this offseason. Earlier immediately, we obtained some clarification on each factors.

Advertisement

If we are able to assume that each stories are true, that the crew received’t be spending massive cash or prime draft picks on quarterbacks over the following a number of months, that opens up a world of chance for enhancing this offensive line.

Within the following, I’ll define a collection of position-by-position suggestions for what I’d wish to see Washington do alongside its offensive entrance.

Advertisement

Eric Hartline-USA TODAY Sports activities

Advertisement

Left Sort out

Charles Leno – Leno is signed for 2 extra years, at a worth of round $13M per yr. He had some notable blown performs this yr, however by a number of metrics, he’s – at worst – a median NFL sort out. Despite the fact that there are potential cap financial savings (round $8M) if he had been lower this offseason, I’d hold him round, with the expectation that his play will enhance considerably as soon as the left guard state of affairs is shored up.

It’s a really small pattern dimension, however with rookie Chris Paul on his proper shoulder towards the Cowboys, Leno was Washington’s third highest rated offensive participant towards in Week 18.

Slicing Leno can actually be revisited within the 2024 offseason, when doing so would save $12M, however I’d need the crew to have a greater possibility lined up earlier than creating an pointless weak point.

Advertisement

NFL: Dallas Cowboys at Washington Commanders

Geoff Burke-USA TODAY Sports activities

Advertisement

Left Guard

Chris Paul – This one is a bit presumptuous, although Paul actually acquitted himself comparatively properly towards the Cowboys, notably by way of pass-blocking. I’ve adequate confidence in line coach John Matsko to be comfy realizing whether or not Paul will have the ability to tackle a full time function in 2023, however his costume rehearsal regarded very strong.

If Washington added one other beginning caliber guard within the draft or in free company, I wouldn’t hate the transfer, however in need of a man like Philadelphia’s Isaac Seumalo – whose worth Spotrac estimates round $12M AAV – I don’t see a ton of alternatives for main improve on the open market this offseason.

Advertisement
NFL: Washington Commanders at Baltimore Ravens

Jessica Rapfogel-USA TODAY Sports activities

Advertisement

Heart

Chase Roullier – When wholesome, Chase has been one of many prime facilities within the league. Nevertheless, in each of the final two years, he’s skilled extreme leg accidents, and the crew has cycled via 4 totally different facilities every season. Washington has gotten a really painful lesson in simply how essential it’s to have good middle play, one thing we had taken without any consideration throughout the first 4 years of Roullier’s profession, throughout which he had been remarkably wholesome.

If it seems that Roullier’s 2022 damage is career-threatening, middle instantly turns into an extremely excessive want within the 2023 draft. That would find yourself being crammed by somebody like Minnesota’s John Michael Schmitz, Arkansas’ Ricky Stromberg, or Notre Dame’s Jarrett Patterson. Underneath this situation, reducing Roullier for cap financial savings ($7.8M) additionally must be a critical consideration.

Even when Roullier seems to be to be wholesome this offseason, I’d take a middle no later than Day 2.

Proper Guard

Sam Cosmi – I think about that 2022 is a season that Cosmi would simply as quickly overlook. His play at proper sort out regressed badly sufficient that he was changed by swing sort out Cornelius Lucas, and after we was deployed at proper guard later within the season, he didn’t look solely comfy there both. The yanking forwards and backwards most likely didn’t do the athletic lineman any short-term favors both.

Advertisement

Mid-season, I advocated for transferring Cosmi to proper guard for the foreseeable future, and I proceed to face by that advice. Various elements level to Cosmi finally having a better upside at guard, and nurturing him at that place, with the chance that – maybe – he performs sort out once more sooner or later sooner or later, looks as if probably the most prudent plan of action. Give Cosmi the complete 2023 offseason at guard, and let’s see how issues work out.

Syndication: The Columbus Dispatch

Advertisement

Barbara Perenic/Columbus Dispatch / USA TODAY NETWORK

Proper Sort out

Extremely drafted rookie/Free agent – Proper sort out is the one place on Washington’s offensive line the place I consider we completely want a brand new face as starter in 2023. Whether or not that be a Day 1 or 2 draft decide like Ohio State’s Dawand Jones, or a free agent like San Francisco’s Mike McGlinchey – who Spotrac estimates will get a contract someplace within the $11M AAV vary – an improve at this place is badly wanted, and I don’t consider there’s anybody presently on the roster who can fill it.

I’d have completely no subject with a commerce again from #16 to choose up some extra picks to make use of a primary rounder on this spot. In actual fact, I’d extremely encourage it.

Advertisement

Atlanta Falcons v Washington Commanders

Advertisement

Photograph by G Fiume/Getty Photographs

Depth

Cornelius Lucas, Wes Schweitzer, Andrew Norwell – Lucas and Norwell are each already signed via 2023, costing the crew $2.8M and $2.3M respectively (subtracting out useless cap hit). My present estimate to re-sign Schweitzer is round $3.5-4M per yr. Having these three as depth for round $9M in 2023 strikes me as fairly good worth, and whereas I don’t need any of them beginning, I don’t have critical points with any of them having to play 3 or 4 video games every subsequent season if the starter goes down with damage.

That stated, as talked about above, I strongly consider Washington must draft strong middle depth – at the very least – this yr, and may most likely take one other late spherical flier on a developmental guard.

It additionally feels prefer it’s time to fish or lower bait on Saahdiq Charles this offseason. He’s had greater than sufficient time to develop – if that’s ever going to occur – and he’s proven little or no so far.

Advertisement

Conclusion

Washington’s offensive line play in 2022 left fairly a bit to be desired. The excellent news is, actually relying on Chase Roullier’s skill to bounce again, the re-configured line might find yourself being fairly practical in 2023 if Washington’s entrance workplace invests vital draft and/or wage capital into it this offseason, and if the younger guards proceed to develop properly.

Ballot

What’s your highest precedence on the offensive line?

Ballot

How would you favor that place be crammed?

  • 0%
    Somebody already on the roster

    (0 votes)



183 votes complete

Vote Now





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Lawmakers again trying to lower legal alcohol limit for drivers in Washington • Washington State Standard

Published

on

Lawmakers again trying to lower legal alcohol limit for drivers in Washington • Washington State Standard


A measure to lower the legal limit for drunk driving in Washington cleared its first legislative hurdle Thursday.

If passed, Washington would join Utah as the only state with a 0.05% blood alcohol concentration limit. Other states have considered similar legislation, but haven’t passed it.

Utah made the move in 2018. The state was also the first to lower the limit from 0.1% to 0.08% in the 1980s.

After the switch from 0.08% to 0.05%, Utah saw a 20% drop in fatal crashes, but that figure crept back up during the COVID-19 pandemic, in line with national trends.

Advertisement

The bill in Washington is sponsored by Sen. John Lovick, D-Mill Creek. Lovick was a longtime Washington State Patrol trooper before serving as Snohomish County sheriff. 

“I see driving behavior beyond anything I could have imagined when I started as a state trooper,” Lovick told the Senate Law & Justice Committee this week. “Drivers are speeding, following too close, passing on the shoulders, running red lights, driving aggressively. Drunk drivers have made our communities unsafe.”

Opponents argue the legislation, Senate Bill 5067, would elevate the liability risk for bars and other establishments that sell alcohol.

Traffic deaths have risen rapidly in recent years, from 538 in 2019 to 809 in 2023, according to the Washington Traffic Safety Commission. The 2023 figure was the most deaths on Washington roads since 1990.

Of those 809 deaths, impaired drivers were involved in about half.

Advertisement

Compared to those driving sober, drivers with a blood alcohol concentration over 0.05% are twice as likely to crash, said Mark McKechnie, the director of external relations for the traffic safety commission. When that rises to 0.07%, the risk triples.

Early estimates for the first half of 2024 showed a marked decline in deaths on Washington roads, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The lower legal limit would take effect July 1, 2026. 

As part of the legislation, the Washington Traffic Safety Commission would run a campaign to inform the public of the new legal limit. The Washington State Institute for Public Policy would have to evaluate the impacts of the new law in a report submitted to the Legislature.

By way of background

Lovick and others have tried repeatedly in recent years to lower the legal limit. The measure has never reached the Senate floor.

Advertisement

Last year, one of the proposal’s chief backers, Sen. Marko Liias, D-Edmonds, expressed frustration after the Senate passed over his drunk driving bill and instead took up legislation to solidify “The Evergreen State” as Washington’s official nickname.

Experts have said consuming a beer or a glass of wine with dinner wouldn’t land drivers above the lowered legal limit.

Two hours after his first drink, a 180-pound man would reach 0.05% after drinking three beers or three glasses of wine. The same is true after two hours for a 140-pound woman, after two beers or glasses of wine.

Worldwide, more than 100 countries have legal limits of 0.05% or lower. 

The concerns

As in years past, hospitality industry groups oppose the legislation. They have argued the proposal could hurt bars and other establishments that rely on alcohol sales to stay afloat.

Advertisement

Julia Gorton, a lobbyist for the Washington Hospitality Association, noted it’s already illegal to drive with a 0.05% blood alcohol concentration if officers see clear signs of impairment.

This legislation “will impact those who decide to stop drinking before they are impaired,” she said. “These are individuals choosing to behave responsibly, who will now be subject to the strongest and strictest DUI penalties in the country.”

The Washington Wine Institute’s Executive Director Josh McDonald said it would be hard for servers to identify impairment at the lower legal limit so they could cut off service.

Jason Lantz, of the Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, noted Colorado and New York also have 0.05% limits, but violations at that level come with lower penalties.

He recommended a similar two-tier system, with the 0.05% limit considered “driving after consumption” instead of driving under the influence.

Advertisement

Amy Freedheim, the chair of the Felony Traffic Unit in the King County prosecutor’s office, tried to assuage concerns. She argued the lower limit wouldn’t lead to more arrests or lawsuits against bars held liable for crashes caused by impaired drivers.

On Thursday, Sen. Phil Fortunato, R-Auburn, offered an amendment to Lovick’s bill, lowering a blood alcohol concentration limit already in state law that brings stiffer penalties. The amendment would have dropped the limit from 0.15% to 0.12%. 

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement

Penalties for first-time offenders at the higher threshold include a minimum $500 fine and at least two days in jail, 30 days of electronic home monitoring or a 120-day 24/7 sobriety program.

Below the 0.15% level, drunk driving penalties drop to a minimum fine of $350 and at least one day in jail, 15 days of electronic home monitoring or a 90-day sobriety program.

“Right now you go from .08 to .15. There’s nothing in the middle,” Fortunato said.

Advertisement

Sen. Manka Dhingra, D-Redmond, said she didn’t disagree with Fortunato’s change, but recognized the political reality for the proposal.

“I think it has been very challenging to get this bill out of the Senate with even the decrease to .05,” she said. “Let’s try to focus on getting the limit to .05, and then let’s continue working toward making sure that we are addressing the penalties.”

The committee approved Lovick’s proposal without Fortunato’s amendment. 

The House version of the bill is set for a committee hearing Tuesday.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Commanders Coach Knew ‘We’re Going to Win’ When Offense Got the Ball Back

Published

on

Commanders Coach Knew ‘We’re Going to Win’ When Offense Got the Ball Back


ASHBURN, Va. — Hope is a powerful thing, but belief is even stronger, and that’s what the Washington Commanders have plenty of after defeating the Tampa Bay Buccaneers 23-20 in the Wild Card Round.

That belief didn’t just show up in Florida, however, it has been growing ever since the Commanders first got together for OTAs and into rookie minicamp, and so on. Every step this team has taken, the belief it has in itself has grown.

Because of it, while most are going to predict Washington will lose to the Detroit Lions this weekend, the coaches and players believe in themselves. And they believe that if they have the ball last with a chance to win they’re going to, because that is exactly what defensive coordinator Joe Whitt Jr. believed last weekend – and it came true.

Washington Commanders defenders Dorance Armstrong and Bobby Wagner.

Jan 12, 2025; Tampa, Florida, USA; Tampa Bay Buccaneers quarterback Baker Mayfield (6) runs against Washington Commanders defensive end Dorance Armstrong (92) and linebacker Bobby Wagner (54) during the second quarter of a NFC wild card playoff at Raymond James Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kim Klement Neitzel-Imagn Images / Kim Klement Neitzel-Imagn Images

“We’re going to win,” is what Whitt says he felt after his defense stopped the Buccaneers’ last possession of the game. “This game here, so it was a second-and-one. We got the stop. And then third-and-one, they sort of bobbled it, we get the stop. Now, they punted to us, I think it was four minutes or something else. Alright, ‘We’re going to go down and win it,’ That’s winning time. We got the stop that we needed, the special teams secured the ball, and we went down there and kicked the field goal. So, that’s what complementary football was all about, playing as a team.” 

Advertisement

Sunday night, the Commanders put together one of the cleanest performances they have had as a team in over a month. Penalties were low–though we’re sure the coaches would say any penalty is too many–mistakes weren’t critical, and like Whitt said, the football was complimentary.

Head coach Dan Quinn knows that’s exactly what his team will need again to keep their season going for at least one more weekend.

“Much like last game, I told you we’ll play our best complimentary game all year, offensively, defensively, and special teams,” said Quinn. “And Detroit in this game calls for that again. And so, we’re working hard on all those things from our field position stuff, our winning time moments, just all of it.”

Stick with CommanderGameday and the Locked On Commanders podcast for more FREE coverage of the Washington Commanders throughout the 2024 season.

• Commanders Get Unexpected Boost in Win vs. Buccaneers

Advertisement

• After Playoff Win, Commanders QB Jayden Daniels Isn’t Satisfied

• Commanders Share Thoughts as Game-Winning Field Goal Doinked In

• Dan Quinn Reveals Emotion During Final Kick in Commanders-Buccaneers



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Purdue vs. Washington player grades: Boilers wake up in second half

Published

on

Purdue vs. Washington player grades: Boilers wake up in second half


Purdue vs. Washington player grades: Boilers wake up in second half

Team GPA: 3.4

Sparse-shooting big man Great Osobor made more 3s than Purdue, but the Boilers won in the paint.

Advertisement

No. 17 Purdue (14-4, 6-1 Big Ten) had initial trouble dispelling Washington (10-8, 1-6), in a similar result on the scoreboard to the Boilers’ win against Minnesota. But, as in that game, Purdue climbed out of a halftime hole to show its superiority away from home in the second half. The main difference Wednesday was that the Boilers created open 3s for themselves and struggled mightily to make them, second period included.

Instead, Purdue found its inside presence via junior point guard Braden Smith’s offensive orchestration and racked up a free throw margin the Huskies couldn’t compete with.

Player stats below, with ratings to follow:

Braden Smith: A-

He played sped up all night, increasingly as the game wore on to its final minutes. The result was more turnovers than usual for the junior guard, but also a great deal of credit for the Boilers’ win.

Advertisement

Smith’s attacking and probing opened things up for Trey Kaufman-Renn (19) and Caleb Furst (15), even if the jumpers never fell in their usual quantity.

Without Smith’s 3 in the mid-second half, it could have been a different ballgame. Instead, he knocked it down, mean-mugged the crowd, and a, “Let’s go Boilers,” chant was clearly audible from my TV speakers in the mid-second half.

Smith’s motor also propelled him to five steals, and Purdue scored 18 points off turnovers.

Fletcher Loyer: B+

Loyer’s first field goal dropped through the net at the nine-minute mark of the second half. Then the rest came. The junior scored 12 points in the final 20 minutes as Washington had too many things to worry about to contain him.

He was uneasy handling the ball and passing in the first half, perhaps due to the bizarre slickness of the court caused apparently by a film on the hardwood or lack of an adequate sticky pad by the scorer’s table, per referee chatter picked up by the broadcast.

Advertisement

Plus, often underrated, Loyer is phenomenal at drawing fouls on defense. He got a big one with less than two minutes to go, and hit a 3 on the other end to stymie the slim chance Washington was clinging to.

Trey Kaufman-Renn: B+

Kaufman-Renn came alive in the second half after an awkward opening period with four turnovers. Once he and Smith found their pick and roll magic, and a few baseline dump-offs here and there, it was all Purdue.

 C.J. Cox: B-

Quiet night from the field, but made good decisions and dribbled dangerously enough to shift Washington’s defense.

Caleb Furst: A-

It was an up-and-down game on the defensive side of the ball for Furst: He forced Wildcat star Great Osobor into a big man air ball – all backboard – early in the first half, but got spun around off-ball in the mid-second for an Osobor bucket.

But offensively, he was exactly what Purdue needed. Fifteen points on a perfect night from the field and excellent at the line. Three offensive boards, too.

Advertisement

Myles Colvin: B-

Had his moments as an off-ball weapon on offense, but otherwise quiet as part of a poor shooting night all around for Purdue.

Camden Heide: B

Out-athleted the Huskies with three rebounds (one offensive) and an authoritative swat in the late second half.

Gicarri Harris: B-

Provided good defensive minutes, matching up well with Washington’s athletic guards.

Raleigh Burgess: NA

Played his three minutes, ran like crazy in them, took a seat.

How I do these

A lot is anchored to Game Score, a metric invented by John Hollinger which (quite imperfectly) estimates a player’s box score contributions. It’s just a starting point for the grades, and it’s readily available. During the game, I focus most of my attention on watching defensive reps, box-outs, offensive movement/involvement, and non-assist passing. I’ll add all the off-ball value to these grades that my eyes can catch.

Advertisement

Further, these are role dependent – my grades answer a question that goes something like, “How well did a player take advantage of the opportunities they were given?”

Late game heroics earn bonus points, and the opposite is true for important errors. Oh, and I hate missed free throws.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending