Connect with us

Washington

Putin blames Kyiv for attack on strategic Crimea bridge

Published

on

Putin blames Kyiv for attack on strategic Crimea bridge


KYIV, Ukraine — President Vladimir Putin accused Ukraine on Sunday of orchestrating the assault on a key Russian hyperlink with occupied Crimea, injecting new, heightened stakes right into a calamitous episode that Ukrainian leaders touted as proof of their means to prevail within the battle with Russia.

Russian investigators claimed to have swiftly recognized suspects within the predawn fireball Saturday that despatched concrete spans of the Crimean Bridge, a $4 billion mission symbolizing Russia’s ambitions to regulate Ukraine, buckling into the waters of the Kerch Strait. A day after the incident, which Russia’s prime legislation enforcement physique deemed a terrorist assault, Putin introduced that Ukraine’s particular providers had been accountable.

“There is no such thing as a doubt that the assault was aimed toward destroying vital civilian infrastructure of the Russian Federation,” Putin stated in a video launched by the Kremlin. The 12-mile lengthy span, whereas utilized by civilians, can also be a vital navy logistics route for Russia’s armed forces, the one direct street and rail route from mainland Russia to Crimea.

The incident despatched shock waves throughout the area, puncturing Kremlin assurances in regards to the bridge’s invincibility and compounding the challenges Russia faces in holding again a Ukrainian counteroffensive that has recovered occupied areas within the nation’s south and east.

Advertisement

Whereas Russian officers stated that restricted street and rail visitors would proceed, substantial harm to the bridge posed a right away logistics problem for Moscow’s navy offensive. Putin personally inaugurated the bridge in 2018, in a step designed to solidify Russia’s grip on the peninsula, which it illegally annexed in 2014.

Whereas the Ukrainian authorities didn’t publicly declare accountability for the incident, officers in Kyiv sought to make use of the blast as proof of its capability to realize a battlefield victory towards Russia’s bigger, better-armed navy, a prospect dismissed by many Western officers only some months in the past.

A Ukrainian official informed The Washington Submit on Saturday that Ukraine’s particular providers had been behind the explosion, which Russian authorities stated occurred when a truck exploded, igniting gasoline tanks on a passing practice.

Putin’s bridge of desires explodes in flames

Talking within the video with Putin, Alexander Bastrykin, the pinnacle of Russia’s Investigative Committee, stated the truck within the incident, which he stated additionally concerned Russian and different nationals, got here from Bulgaria by way of Georgia and into Russia earlier than being pushed towards Crimea.

Advertisement

Ukrainian officers dismissed the Russian statements, as a substitute condemning Russia for in a single day missile strikes that authorities stated killed at the least 14 individuals and injured at the least 70, together with 11 youngsters, within the Ukrainian metropolis of Zaporizhzhia. After the assault, officers posted images of {a partially} destroyed residence constructing, the place the central part had collapsed right into a pile of rubble.

“Putin accuses Ukraine of terrorism? Sounds too cynical even for Russia,” Mykhailo Podolyak, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, said on Twitter. “There is just one terrorist state right here and the entire world is aware of who it’s.”

Russia has repeatedly struck civilian targets since its Feb. 24 invasion, together with hospitals, colleges, residence buildings and railway stations.

In Zaporizhzhia, at the least eight individuals had been pulled from the particles after the assault, Oleksandr Starukh, governor of Zaporizhzhia Oblast, stated Sunday. Rescue efforts had been ongoing.

The destruction highlighted the potential for Russian retaliation for the bridge incident, and the continued vulnerability of Ukrainian cities regardless of the large shipments of weapons supplied by america and European nations in latest months.

Advertisement

Ukrainian International Minister Dmytro Kuleba stated the Zaporizhzhia assault supplied additional proof that Ukraine’s backers ought to accelerate that supply. “We urgently want extra trendy air and missile protection techniques to avoid wasting harmless lives,” he stated on Twitter.

Officers in Kyiv hope that the bridge incident, no matter its trigger, will present further gasoline to their marketing campaign to draw expanded assist from the West, together with longer-range missiles and tanks, and in flip persuade Russian troops and the Russian public that the battle is a misplaced trigger.

Simon Schlegel, a Ukraine knowledgeable with the Worldwide Disaster Group, stated freeway routes throughout Russian-controlled territory to the strategic metropolis of Kherson, which Russian is predicted to defend zealously, weren’t a super substitute for the Crimean bridge as a result of they’re nearer to Ukrainian navy positions.

Andriy Zagorodnyuk, a former Ukrainian protection minister who now serves as an adviser to the Zelensky authorities, stated the psychological influence of the bridge incident could also be better than even the ensuing logistical challenges for Russia.

“It destroys the belief from the Russian navy, the Russian authorities and even usually Russian individuals of their incapability to handle dangers and incapability to guard,” he stated. “And that’s vastly essential.”

Advertisement

Michael Carpenter, U.S. ambassador to the Group for Safety and Cooperation in Europe, known as the Zaporizhzhia assault “barbaric. … We’ll need to maintain reaching deeper,” he stated on Twitter. “Extra navy help, extra help, extra sanctions.”

Russian authorities sought to telegraph normalcy following the bridge blast, regardless of what seemed to be critical harm to the construction.

In a message on his Telegram channel, Sergei Aksyonov, head of Crimea area, confirmed a photograph of an undisturbed part of the bridge and stated that officers had been working to regularize transport between Crimea and Russia’s Krasnodar area. He stated regular railway providers had resumed however that solely vehicles had been passing on the bridge for now, whereas buses and heavy automobiles had been touring by ferry.

Russia’s transport ministry reported on Sunday that passenger and freight trains had been operating recurrently throughout the bridge by Sunday morning. It stated commuter rail service would resume that night, in response to Interfax.

It was not clear whether or not truck-borne explosives or one thing else brought on the incident.

Advertisement

Baza, a Russian information outlet that steadily reviews leaked info, acknowledged on its Telegram channel that the driving force of the truck the Russian authorities stated exploded on the bridge had been contracted to ship a cargo cargo to Simferopol, a metropolis in Crimea. The motive force was presupposed to be paid 48,000 rubles, or about $770, Baza reported.

He was contracted on Oct. 6 and loaded the cargo within the Russian metropolis of Armavir on Oct. 7, stopping to sleep simply earlier than the bridge and heading on early the subsequent morning, it stated.

“He informed his household about it, after the decision he turned off his cellphone,” Baza stated. Video posted by a Russian state newspaper confirmed the explosion occurring at 6:03 a.m., when few automobiles had been touring on the bridge.

Officers in St. Petersburg named the 2 different individuals authorities stated had been killed within the explosion as Eduard Chuchakin and Zoya Sofronova, a married couple who labored as historians and documentarians. Authorities stated their automobile was driving close to the truck that exploded.

The assault may intensify inner strain that Putin is going through over battlefield setbacks. The Russian chief is because of maintain a Safety Council assembly on Monday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated.

Advertisement

Already, outstanding Russians are urging reprisal, together with lawmakers and media figures reminiscent of Margarita Simonyan, editor in chief of state-owned channel RT. After the blast, she asked in a tweet: “And?”

Dmitry Medvedev, deputy head of Russia’s Safety Council, known as for a forceful response.

“Russia’s response to this crime can solely be the direct destruction of the terrorists. The way in which it’s usually finished on the earth,” he stated in an interview with journalist Nadana Friedrichson, which was printed on her Telegram channel. “That is what the residents of Russia are ready for.”

Isabelle Khurhudyan in Kryvyi Rih, Kostiantyn Khudov in Kyiv and John Hudson in Washington contributed to this report.

Struggle in Ukraine: What it’s essential know

The newest: Russian President Vladimir Putin signed decrees Friday to annex 4 occupied areas of Ukraine, following staged referendums that had been broadly denounced as unlawful. Observe our stay updates right here.

Advertisement

The response: The Biden administration on Friday introduced a brand new spherical of sanctions on Russia, in response to the annexations, focusing on authorities officers and relations, Russian and Belarusian navy officers and protection procurement networks. President Volodymyr Zelensky additionally stated Friday that Ukraine is making use of for “accelerated ascension” into NATO, in an obvious reply to the annexations.

In Russia: Putin declared a navy mobilization on Sept. 21 to name up as many as 300,000 reservists in a dramatic bid to reverse setbacks in his battle on Ukraine. The announcement led to an exodus of greater than 180,000 individuals, largely males who had been topic to service, and renewed protests and different acts of defiance towards the battle.

The struggle: Ukraine mounted a profitable counteroffensive that compelled a serious Russian retreat within the northeastern Kharkiv area in early September, as troops fled cities and villages that they had occupied for the reason that early days of the battle and deserted massive quantities of navy gear.

Photographs: Washington Submit photographers have been on the bottom from the start of the battle — right here’s a few of their strongest work.

How one can assist: Listed here are methods these within the U.S. can assist the Ukrainian individuals in addition to what individuals around the globe have been donating.

Advertisement

Learn our full protection of the Russia-Ukraine battle. Are you on Telegram? Subscribe to our channel for updates and unique video.





Source link

Washington

BIZ BUZZ: Antonios go to Washington

Published

on

BIZ BUZZ: Antonios go to Washington


Donald Trump is scheduled to be inaugurated—again—as the president of the United States on Jan. 20 in Washington.

Among those who will witness his return to power as the 47th president of the world’s largest economy are some of his old friends from the Philippines.

We’re talking about Century Properties Group founder and chair Jose EB Antonio and his wife, Hilda.

Article continues after this advertisement
Advertisement

Going with them is their third son, Jose Roberto, who had just been appointed managing director of the J. Antonio Group Inc. in charge of resort-related projects.

It may be recalled that the Trumps and the Antonios struck up a friendship decades ago in New York when Trump was more known as a property developer, just like the Antonios. Some of their children also went to business school together.

And then, the Antonios also brought the Trump brand into one of the office buildings in its Century City development in Makati City.

Article continues after this advertisement

But the elder Antonio will be there not just as a personal friend invited by the Trumps to attend the inauguration but also to represent President Marcos as his ambassador-at-large tasked with inviting more investments into the Philippines.

Advertisement

Article continues after this advertisement

With a friend in the White House, the Antonios are confident that more investments as well as visitors will flow toward the Philippines. —Tina Arceo-Dumlao

Article continues after this advertisement

Clark hits the Belle’s eye

In July 2024, Belle Corp. gave us a teaser about applying for a gaming license from “government regulators.”

Despite the rumor mill running wild that the gaming-focused investment firms of delisted subsidiary Premium Leisure Corp. had plans to conquer Clark, Belle opted to keep quiet.

Advertisement
Article continues after this advertisement

Nearly half a year later, Belle hailed Clark as “the next gaming and tourism hub” and confirmed that they had, indeed, applied for a gaming license specifically to develop an integrated resort in the former American air base.

Belle president and CEO Armin Raquel Santos likewise expressed optimism on his company’s growth prospects, “and bullish on the Philippine gaming market and its resilience despite industry headwinds.”

”Belle, through its gaming subsidiaries, continues to explore and pursue related ventures and high-growth opportunities in the gaming space that will enhance shareholder value while delivering its commitments to all stakeholders,” the company quoted Santos as saying.

Though much still remains unsaid about Belle’s plans for Clark, it is clear that the gaming industry is still attractive despite some weakness and hiccups—Bloomberry Corp.’s earnings, for instance, and Davao-based businessman Dennis Uy’s long-stalled Cebu casino project.

Advertisement


Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.


Your subscription has been successful.

Let’s see if Belle will go against the odds. —Meg J. Adonis

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

What Washington State’s head coach said after Gonzaga game

Published

on

What Washington State’s head coach said after Gonzaga game


Washington State men’s basketball head coach David Riley could point to a few factors that led to Gonzaga pulling away from the Cougars during the second half of Saturday night’s showdown at the McCarthey Athletic Center.

For starters, the Bulldogs’ 15-5 scoring run to start the second half certainly didn’t help the Cougs’ cause. Neither did Ryan Nembhard, who came out of the halftime break even more refreshed after sitting on the bench for the final 9:34 of the first half due to foul trouble. Turnovers and miscues on the defensive end of the floor also started to pile up for WSU, which led by six points in the first half only to trail by three at the break and fall behind by 21 in the second half while the Zags nailed 10 3-pointers and scored 20 points off 16 turnovers.

Consider Saturday night, then, a perfect storm for the Bulldogs (14-4, 5-0 WCC). Led by Graham Ike’s 21 points, Gonzaga pulled away for an 88-75 victory over its in-state rival in a thriller from the Kennel.

Here’s what Riley had to say after the game.

Advertisement

On what changed for WSU in the second half:

“It was a hard-fought game, and I feel like we had it slip away from us early in that second half where we didn’t stay connected as much, and I personally didn’t do a good enough job of having us ready for the fight. They got some 50-50 balls. They got a couple offensive rebounds, just some toughness plays that second half that hurt us. And that comes down to, we have game plan stuff, we’re gonna have X’s and O’s, we’re gonna have great plays from different players and bad plays from different players, but that fight for 40 minutes, I think, was the difference, and they came out with a little more fire than us.”

On Ryan Nembhard’s impact in the second half after sitting most of the first half:

“He did a good job with their pace. I think he gets them up the floor really well. I felt like it was a lot of factors that second half, and he played a part in that and started isolating some of our bigs when we made a couple of adjustments. [Nembhard is a] good player.”

On WSU’s defensive breakdowns that led to 10 3-pointers for Gonzaga:

“A couple of execution errors. I think one of them we didn’t have a ball screen right, one of them we didn’t order our post defense right. Kind of going into the half that was our thing, when things get tough, or they throw in a 25-second possession, we got to execute all 30 seconds of the shot clock. And I think it was more just cover stuff. We didn’t have that many space cadet errors. I think it was more just kind of one guy doing something that wasn’t exactly right in coverage.”

MORE GONZAGA NEWS & ANALYSIS

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Continue to follow our Gonzaga coverage on social media by liking us on Facebook and following us on Instagram and Twitter.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

What Gonzaga’s Mark Few said after win vs. Washington State

Published

on

What Gonzaga’s Mark Few said after win vs. Washington State


The Gonzaga men’s basketball team pulled away from Washington State for an 88-75 victory in the first meeting between the in-state rivals in over a decade.

Graham Ike led the way with 21 points on 8-for-11 from the field, Nolan Hickman added 19 points and the Bulldogs (14-4, 5-0 WCC) earned their fifth straight win to open league play by putting the Cougars (13-5, 3-2 WCC) away early in the second half. After ending the first half on an 8-2 scoring run, the Zags came out of the second half with a sense of urgency on both ends, sparking a 15-5 scoring run to make it a double-digit margin.

Here’s what Gonzaga head coach Mark Few had to say after the game.

On what he told the team at halftime that led to the strong start to the second half:

“I just told them, ‘hey, we’re in a we’re in a battle. It’s a great game. Both teams are competing really hard, and we’re at our best when we’re in attack mode.’ And they did a great job of taking the message and I thought we really went out and turned defense into offense, and we knew that was going to be a big key for us. [The Cougars] are hard to guard, they’re big and they’re physical, and [WSU coach David Riley] does a really lot of nice stuff on on offense that exploits mismatches. But our guys battled tonight, so I was really proud of them.”

Advertisement

On the team’s performance while Ryan Nembhard was on the bench for the final 9 minutes of the first half:

“They played great. I told them that in the locker room that that was huge. We haven’t really had to do that all year. And this guy [Nolan Hickman] stepped up. He was amazing tonight. I mean, seven boards … defensively in there, battling in the post. I mean, he did a lot of stuff that, as I said, he’s now, he set a high standard, so kind of be counting on that moving forward, but he and Dusty [Stromer] both really helped during that stretch and [Khalif Battle] and obviously having Ben [Gregg] and then Graham was rock solid all night.”

On the team’s effort on the defensive end of the floor in the second half:

“I thought our effort and our making plays, I thought it was definitely up there [with the best of the season], and just the physicality that it took. Because, again, they’re so much bigger than us at several of those spots. And again, you just don’t see the post-up thing like this, where your guards are getting constantly posted. But so in that way, we fought, we were physical and kind of had to navigate our way through a lot of different actions. There’s staggers and some curls and some switches and all that. For the most part, we did pretty good.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending