Connect with us

Washington

Amtrak moves to seize control of Union Station

Published

on

Amtrak moves to seize control of Union Station


Amtrak is utilizing eminent area to attempt to seize management of Union Station, a transfer that the passenger railroad mentioned is important to appreciate long-planned enlargement and modernization of the nation’s second-busiest practice hub.

The historic station, a fixture within the coronary heart of the District, is owned by america, however it’s leased to and operated by different entities. In a grievance filed Thursday within the District Court docket for the District of Columbia, the railroad sought management of the property curiosity owned by Union Station Investco LLC, a subsidiary of the New York based-Ashkenazy Acquisition Corp., which has subleasing rights of the station by means of 2084.

Amtrak mentioned it hopes to take over operations and administration of the practice corridor to pursue multibillion-dollar investments on the station, together with a long-planned concourse enlargement and main repairs to a tunnel that runs below the station and is “in critical want of restore or substitute.”

USI will proceed to function the station till the courtroom decides that possession and management might be awarded to Amtrak, the railroad mentioned. Ben Ashkenazy, chief govt and chairman of Ashkenazy Acquisition Corp., didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark in a message left together with his assistant.

Advertisement

“We have to advance some long-delayed state of excellent restore and capital tasks in order that we are able to enhance the station and shore up the station infrastructure,” mentioned Dennis Newman, Amtrak’s govt vp for technique, planning and accessibility. “An improved Washington Union Station is actually key to our mission.”

Newman mentioned Amtrak believes it’s higher suited to handle and function the station due to its a long time of expertise. Amtrak owns stations in New York Metropolis, Chicago, Philadelphia and Baltimore. “We uniquely have the capabilities to be the steward of a facility, a really critically necessary facility, like Washington Union Station,” he mentioned.

The station, which opened in 1907, is understood for its marble ground and coffered ceiling and consists of eateries and outlets. It’s a main hub for intercity and commuter trains (Maryland MARC and Virginia Railway Categorical), Metro, and native and intercity buses.

Amtrak already owns the station’s platforms and railroad tracks. The U.S. authorities in 1985 approved the nonprofit Union Station Redevelopment Corp. (USRC) to supervise the property. Union Station Investco has sublease rights by means of USRC.

Amtrak presently subleases a small portion of the station — about 13.4 % — from USI for its railroad operations, which incorporates the concourse space proper earlier than passengers exit to the platform. The provider desires to take over about 425,000 sq. toes of the station, which incorporates the complete property, besides the parking storage.

Advertisement

Amtrak’s submitting makes the case that buying leasing management will enable the railroad to restore the practice tunnel “in order that security and stability are maintained.” Finishing that undertaking quickly is vital to switch structurally poor beams, girders and columns, mentioned the railroad, and keep away from collapse, which might have important results on practice journey. Amtrak mentioned it additionally plans to broaden ticketing and ready areas, enhance accessibility and passenger circulation, and add extra passenger facilities whereas rising capability to satisfy future demand.

Amtrak mentioned that it “lacks each the house and management to make a lot wanted enhancements” at Union Station, which carries greater than 5 million rail passengers yearly and is a high cease within the Northeast Hall, the spine of the nation’s passenger rail system. The station was designated a historic landmark by the District in 1964 and listed within the Nationwide Register of Historic Locations in 1969.

Amtrak mentioned in courtroom papers that “poor upkeep and lack of capital funding… plagued the Station through the years.” The submitting cited a 1981 incident by which heavy rains brought about a part of the roof to crash into the passenger ready room. USI acquired its lease in 2007.

About $75 million in deferred upkeep is required at Union Station, in response to the courtroom submitting, which cites a latest constructing evaluation by USI and the Federal Railroad Administration. However, it says, there are “inadequate funds accessible by means of the Capital Upkeep Funds” within the USI sublease.

Amtrak’s submitting additionally cited its personal plan to overtake infrastructure supporting the tunnel. In 2017, Amtrak had projected it may have accomplished the intensive fixes within the subbasement by this 12 months. It mentioned it began negotiations with USI on the plan in 2018.

Advertisement

However USI has dragged its toes, Amtrak argues in its submitting: “USI’s repeated rejections of Amtrak’s proposals associated to Amtrak’s wants for this undertaking have meant that this vital [state of good repair] undertaking has not been successfully began.”

Beverley Swaim-Staley, president and chief govt of the USRC, declined to remark Thursday. The FRA, which offers oversight, didn’t reply to a request for remark.

Amtrak’s Board of Administrators final month authorised a decision approving the acquisition of the property curiosity, saying that the transfer would enable Amtrak to “immediately spend money on [Washington Union Station] in a extra environment friendly and efficient method, making probably the most profit for intercity and public transit riders.” The decision was authorised unanimously by the board, which features a designee of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and FRA Administrator Amit Bose.

Amtrak mentioned it made a proposal to USI to purchase its leasing proper for $250 million on April 6, however mentioned the corporate didn’t reply to the provide by an April 13 deadline.

Amtrak on Thursday made the $250 million cost to the courtroom, “the quantity of which it estimates to be simply compensation,” in response to the courtroom submitting, which says the quantity was decided by means of an impartial actual property appraisal. The courtroom will decide the suitable value and if and when Amtrak can take over.

Advertisement

As of Thursday night, USI had not responded to Amtrak’s submitting in courtroom.

Amtrak additionally notes that USI not too long ago confronted two foreclosures actions: Though they had been subsequently canceled, they underscore the “important monetary danger” of USI’s continued administration and operations. Monetary struggles may immediate USI to attempt to promote its curiosity in Union Station “to some unknown individual or entity,” Amtrak mentioned in its submitting.

Amtrak’s transfer comes amid a push from the railroad and USRC for a multibillion-dollar enlargement and overhaul of Union Station that will add concourses and tracks, extra retail choices, a brand new practice corridor, and fashionable parking and bus services. The proposed enlargement, at the very least a $10 billion personal and public funding, requires a metamorphosis of the nation’s second-busiest rail hub by 2040.

Joe McAndrew, who oversees transportation points for the Higher Washington Partnership, composed of chief executives between Richmond and Baltimore, mentioned Amtrak’s transfer is a “step ahead” for the redevelopment of Union Station, which has been deteriorating.

“The corporate’s possession of the a long time lengthy lease for the station constructing stands to reinforce the velocity that we are able to notice the advantages of the redevelopment of this critically necessary infrastructure asset for the area,” mentioned McAndrews.

Advertisement

Amtrak has for years deliberate to remake its concourse to double capability, enhance accessibility, and relieve crowding. However that undertaking, which was to start in 2019, has been on maintain. Officers mentioned they wish to create a contemporary and brighter house for the 100,000 each day intercity, commuter and native vacationers who cross by means of Union Station.

Michael Laris and Ian Duncan contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Years after his dad drowned, this Commanders starter is teaching kids to swim

Published

on

Years after his dad drowned, this Commanders starter is teaching kids to swim


Cornelius Lucas III remembers everything about the day his father drowned on a family camping trip outside their home in New Orleans.

“We had a little campfire going. … I was running around. I was in and out the water, but I didn’t really go deep. My dad had went in the water deep a couple times, and I feel like this was his second or third time, maybe third or fourth time going back in the water.

“He literally asked me, ‘You want to come with me?’ I was like, ‘Nah, I’m just gonna stick back here and throw the football around.’ And I just remember seeing him walk out — as a kid, everything seemed bigger — but maybe like 40, 50 yards deep into the water. And then he — I saw his hands waving at me, and he just dipped underwater.”

People rushed out to help, but when they got there, they couldn’t find his father. He had been dragged under by a rip tide.

Advertisement

“Forty-five minutes later, he floated back,” Lucas said.

“At the age of seven, I was out of having a dad, out of having my best bud, my best friend, my greatest — my best teacher, you know what I’m saying? Like, the guy that was put in this world to give me all the game that I’ve been searching for since then.”

Twenty-six years later, Lucas is a man, 6-foot-8, 327 pounds, a professional hitter with a goofball grin and the self-confidence he lacked growing up without his dad. Lucas believes his unlikely journey has led him to this moment with the Washington Commanders, where, entering the 11th season of his improbable NFL career, the longtime backup is competing for the huge role of starting left tackle and blindside protector for new franchise quarterback Jayden Daniels.

Lucas, 33, feels he’s doing well early in the competition with rookie Brandon Coleman, and unlike his first shot at being a full-time starter (his second season, with Detroit), he feels ready.

Many players who go undrafted out of college, as Lucas did out of Kansas State in 2014, get chewed up by the NFL. Their moment is darkened by the ever-present possibility of getting fired, and they’re often forced out of the league against their will, broken or brokenhearted. In his fifth year, Lucas was overwhelmed by repeated rejection and tried to quit by ignoring calls from his agent.

Advertisement

It was in those difficult moments Lucas felt his father’s absence most.

“Outside of my coaches and my teammates to push me and tell me I could do this, I haven’t had someone I could call on and just tell them how I’m feeling, what’s going on,” he said.

“It’s really been a me situation. Like, me figuring it out. Me going home and sitting in silence for two hours because I got beat in practice, and I’m thinking about why I got beat and how I can’t get beat no more because I’m on the edge of getting cut, and you know — I’m saying it’s been stressful. ”

As he honed his skills, Lucas has grown mentally tough, observing people around him, looking for “life tidbits” and refining who he wants to be.

In 2018, everything came together. Lucas caught a break, played well in one game for his hometown New Orleans Saints and parlayed it into a job with Chicago, where he shined. In 2020, he signed a two-year deal with the Commanders, and in 2022, he signed another. Last summer, he felt like he finally “filled myself up enough to pour into others.”

Advertisement

And he had an idea how: Swim camp. Every summer, NFL players host youth football camps across the country, and while he saw the value in them, he wanted to do something more personal. He attended pool parties growing up, even after his father’s death, but he still had never gone in a pool deeper than his height.

So he partnered with Son of a Saint, a nonprofit organization for fatherless boys in New Orleans, and figured he could show boys like him how to be a man and teach them a potentially lifesaving skill.

“I live in New Orleans, Louisiana,” Lucas said. “We are currently seven feet under sea level. In New Orleans, we get flooding. Hurricane Katrina, it was flooding for 45 days.”

This year, at his second camp, the only boy scared of the water was too big for anyone but Lucas to hold while learning to doggy paddle. Lucas encouraged him to go into the pool, urging him to fight their fear together.

“Trust me,” Lucas said. “I won’t let you drown.”

Advertisement

Weeks later, Lucas left New Orleans for training camp extra motivated. His girlfriend — with whom he bonded, in part, over missing a parent — is pregnant with their first child, a son, due in early November. Sometimes, when Lucas notices her belly growing, it makes him want to go outside in the sun and practice.

“When he gets here, I just want him to see his daddy doing the right thing.”

Lucas wants to teach his son all the lessons he had to gather from others, such as how to mow the lawn or drive on the highway. He’s picking up even more from Instagram and TikTok. He hopes to one day teach his son to play tackle.

And he wants to throw his son in the water. He wants him to flail on his own at first, to fight to float, because he believes struggling will help his son get comfortable. Even if he doesn’t like to swim, Lucas’s top priority is for his son to never feel how he sometimes felt around water.

“He’s not gonna have a fear of it,” he said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Advice | Carolyn Hax: Fiancé secretly tracks ‘gold digger’s’ contribution to shared home

Published

on

Advice | Carolyn Hax: Fiancé secretly tracks ‘gold digger’s’ contribution to shared home


Adapted from an online discussion.

Dear Carolyn: My fiancé and I bought a house late last year, with help from his parents. Though we both make good salaries, he comes from a rich family, and I was raised by a single mom. His parents insisted on giving us the money for our down payment and closing costs, and my mom gave us a dishwasher, which was very generous of all of them and also appreciated.

We have been working like mad on fixing the house up to get it ready for our wedding. Neither of us is very experienced with DIY, so it’s been a difficult, stressful process and caused some tension between us. We were discussing what kind of flooring to get for the front hall, and I wanted the more expensive but easier-to-work-with stuff. We got into a fight that escalated to the point of him accusing me of being a gold digger who was after his money. I was in shock and asked him why he would think that, and he said, “Because you told me about how you grew up poor,” and he’s had the thought in the back of his head since we bought the house. He told me he has a spreadsheet where he keeps track of how much he’s spent on me versus how much I’ve spent on him and he has spent thousands more on me, not even counting the money his parents gave us.

I told him that didn’t sound right since we split all costs 50/50, and he admitted it included my engagement ring. It is a family heirloom his great-aunt gave him, but he was counting the value of it.

Advertisement

Later he apologized, but I’m still hurt and angry. I feel paranoid that maybe his family said something. I’m really sad that all this time I’ve been loving him and thinking he was wonderful, and he’s been thinking this way about me and even documenting it so he could throw it in my face.

He’s said the spreadsheet is just an “anxiety thing” and he loves me and wants us to work on fixing things. I think I do, too, but then I think of what he said and I get overwhelmed. How can I get over this?

“Gold Digger”: Whoo. I don’t know. I don’t know that I could.

He not only has kept the thought in the back of his mind for months? years? that you have poor values and ulterior motives and can’t be trusted, but kept records in the event he needs to prove it.

I wish I had a more hopeful answer for you. But he either lashed out impulsively and didn’t mean it, or accidentally told the truth — those are the only two choices — and the first is a stretch when there’s a spreadsheet as evidence of the second.

Advertisement

Plus, the first is so vicious in its own right.

He says he loves you, okay. But trusts? Respects? Believes in?

Does he feel lucky every day to be the person you chose?

Best case, “just an ‘anxiety thing,’” still casts you as a threat to be controlled. So the “work on fixing things” doesn’t sound like DIY, but instead couples counseling at the least.

The family paranoia, by the way, is wasted stress — each of you stands on your own authority in choosing your partner, 100 percent, or you’re not ready to be anyone’s partner. If he’s that susceptible to their influence, then the problem is still between the two of you, so that’s where your attention belongs.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Trump ally who denies 2020 election results threatens law enforcement

Published

on

Trump ally who denies 2020 election results threatens law enforcement


Patrick Byrne, who has funded efforts to undermine the results of the 2020 election, said in an online forum Thursday that law enforcement would face “a piano wire and a blowtorch” if they did not drop a case against an ally.

Byrne, a former CEO of online retailer Overstock, used the phrase half a dozen times Thursday as he participated in a nearly three-hour-long event on X Spaces. His remarks came amid heightened worries about political violence, and he acknowledged during the event that his references to strangling or blowtorching officials were threatening and could be considered felonies. On Friday, he downplayed his comments, saying he had been speaking metaphorically and is committed to peace.

The “Cyber Crisis: Saving Tina Peters” event was aimed at rallying support for the former clerk of Mesa County, Colo., who faces charges accusing her of tampering with election equipment three years ago. Peters has pleaded not guilty, and her case goes to trial next week.

Byrne called out law enforcement and prosecutors during the forum, saying they would face violence if they did not drop the case.

Advertisement

“If you have any brains at all, which I’m not sure they do, they should be throwing in the towel and just surrendering and dropping this case against Tina because those who don’t are going to end up facing a piano wire and a blowtorch before this is over if I have anything to do with it,” Byrne said. “So I know that’s probably another felony, but f— it — threatening them like that — but there we are.”

Byrne, who said he was participating in the event from Azerbaijan, accused law enforcement of committing treason and claimed he had been hacking Venezuela’s government for two years.

“I don’t care how many felonies I’ve committed, and I don’t care that I’m committing felonies by threatening you,” he said of law enforcement. “You folks do your job or when this is over, the folks who are part of this are going to be facing, you know, piano wire and blowtorches before this is over. So you start doing your job and stop worrying about me.”

Byrne said Friday that his comments were “obviously a metaphor.”

“Please be aware that my turns of phrase like that are metaphoric expressions,” he said by text message. “There’s been no one more committed to peaceful resolution of this than I.”

Advertisement

He said his views on peace do not extend to people like former ambassador Manuel Rocha, who pleaded guilty this year to serving as a secret agent for Cuba for decades. “The only exception to peaceful resolution will be for any who turn out of Cuba and Venezuela, such as ambassador Rocha,” Byrne said by text message.

Byrne noted it was 4 a.m. in Azerbaijan when he participated in the event on X, and he may not have spoken as carefully as he otherwise would.

Spokespeople for the Colorado attorney general’s office and Mesa County district attorney’s office did not immediately comment Friday.

Byrne’s comments come three-and-a-half months ahead of the presidential election, as scholars, law enforcement agencies and election administrators raise alarms about the risk of political violence. Election officials have faced an onslaught of threats and harassment since the 2020 election and the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by a mob chanting about Donald Trump’s false election claims.

Two weeks ago, Trump was injured during an assassination attempt that left one of his supporters dead at a rally in Butler, Pa. The violence fueled new warnings of the risk to public officials and ordinary Americans, regardless of their political views.

Advertisement

Before today’s combustible political environment, the phrases Byrne used might have prompted outreach by authorities to advise against using such language, said Paul Charlton, a former U.S. attorney under President George W. Bush. These days, state and federal officials tend to take such talk more seriously. Byrne’s language, he said, “sounds not only like a threat but a confession and an acknowledgment that it could be a felony to make such a threat.”

Words alone can be sufficient to prosecute threats against public officials if authorities can show proof of intent to do harm, he said.

“That is an instance in which, in my mind, it is very much worth law enforcement’s attention,” Charlton said.

Byrne’s repeated references to the Peters trial — and the prosecutors involved in it — are important aspects of his overall comments, said Carol Lam, a former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of California who was also appointed by Bush.

“Because he references a specific trial and he’s talking about the people who are bringing the case, that should be very troubling to law enforcement,” she said. Even if he said he was speaking metaphorically, she added, “What does that matter if someone went out and bought piano wire at his suggestion?”

Advertisement

Two hours after The Washington Post contacted Byrne, he posted a statement on X that reiterated what he told a reporter about meaning his comments metaphorically. He said he wanted people to remain peaceful, but added information would come out that would “test our ability to remain peaceful and my ability to contribute to that cause.”

Byrne used this week’s online forum to argue for dropping the charges against Peters, who is accused of participating in a scheme to allow a purported data expert to secretly copy files from Dominion Voting Systems equipment in 2021. She faces seven felonies and three misdemeanors in a case that is scheduled to go to trial on Wednesday.

He has long championed Peters and others who have questioned the results of the 2020 election. Four days after members of the electoral college voted to give Biden a victory in December 2020, Byrne joined other Trump allies in the Oval Office to argue Trump could use the National Guard to seize voting machines. Also in the meeting were Trump-aligned attorneys Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani and former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

In the years since, Byrne has used his fortune and his nonprofit America Project to bankroll efforts meant to uncover problems with how elections are run, including a partisan review of the 2020 election in Arizona. Byrne and the America Project have helped fund groups like We the People Ariz. Alliance, an Arizona-based political action committee whose co-founder in March said she would “lynch” a Republican official who helps oversee elections in the state’s largest county. She later said her comment was a joke.

Courts and independent agencies have found no evidence of widespread election fraud.

Advertisement

Byrne led Overstock for two decades. He resigned in 2019 after it came to light that he had been romantically involved with Maria Butina, a Russian gun activist who pleaded guilty in 2018 to conspiring with a Russian official to infiltrate conservative politics in the United States. She was deported after serving a 15-month prison sentence. Byrne published a memoir this year that included a preface by Butina.

Dominion, the voting machine company, filed a $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Byrne in 2021. The case is ongoing. Dominion won settlements of $787.5 million with Fox News and $243 million with Newsmax and is seeking $1 billion or more from Giuliani, Powell and MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell.

Spencer S. Hsu and Rachel Weiner contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending